N-2Responses to Information Requests
1 passage
1 Request IR-1: 2 - 3 This project was identified on page 255 of the 2010 ACE Plan for the amount of $1,151,049. - 4 NSPI's request is asking for approval of $1,063,981 to cover the purchase of 10 light work - 5 vehicles. NSPI advised in i...
AI summary The document discusses a request for approval of funds related to the purchase of light work vehicles, referencing the 2010 ACE Plan. A variance of $87,068 is explained as the result of removing interest charges for 2011 due to an input error in the original calculation.
05761NSPI's Response to Board Directive
2 passages
November 16, 2010 Nancy McNeil Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3 rd Floor PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: CI 38852 – Work Vehicle Replacement NSPI Responses to Bo...
AI summary NSPI is directed to explain the delay in purchasing vehicles as noted by the Board during its review of the 2010 ACE Plan work orders. The number of vehicles acquired in 2009 was lower than the number approved by the Board.
Transportation Vehicles Board Approval Year Forecast # of Vehicles Cost per Unit 2009 2010 $596,221 $663,747 $1,259,968 23 27 $25,923 $24,583 Actual Year Actuals # of Vehicles Cost per Unit 2009 $710,914 25 $28,437 2010 To be finalized $71...
AI summary The original ACE forecast for purchasing 60 transportation vehicles in 2009 was revised to 50 vehicles, split between 2009 and 2010. NSPI purchased 25 vehicles in 2009, with actual costs exceeding the forecast.
05769Letter from the Board requesting additional information
1 passage
Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board Mailing address PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 353 [email protected] Web \1i..,JV\,l\A/~nsuarb.ca Office 3rd Floor 1601 LowerWater Street Halifax, Nova Scotia B3J 3P6 902 424-4448 t 9...
AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board requests a cost-benefit comparison of vehicle life cycle costs for 16 work vehicles leased in 2009 by Nova Scotia Power Inc. due to cash flow issues, seeking evidence that leasing provided savings for customers.
Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →