Topic:"Affiliate Transactions" in M03416

REDACTED 1 Request IR-1: 9 (b) Please explain how this project meets the Board's requirements for affiliate 10 transactions. 11 12 Response IR-2: 13 14 (a-b) Please refer to Confidential Attachment 1 for a copy of a presentation which desc...

AI summary The text includes requests and responses related to a project's compliance with the Board's requirements for affiliate transactions and an upgrade project under the 2009 ACE Plan. It asks for updates on the project's progress, a comparison of planned and actual work, and an explanation of why the project is not being completed in 2010 despite budget allocations.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Response IR-T11: (cont'd) 2 3 The Current PLT Contract 4 5 In the Board's June 2008 Decision in respect of the review of affiliate transactions, NSPI was 6 directed not to make any modifications or extensions to existing...

AI summary The document discusses the current PLT contract between NSPI and EUS, referencing the Board's 2008 decision on affiliate transactions and the subsequent revisions to the Code of Conduct effective June 1, 2009. The contract is set to expire on December 31, 2010, and any future agreement with an affiliate will be subject to the updated Code of Conduct.

ORDER WHEREAS Nova Scotia Power Incorporated ("NSPI") filed applications on July 27, 2010, with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (the "Board") for approval of Work Orders CI# 38819 - 51V Tremont Circuit Breaker & Bus in the amount...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) submitted applications for the approval of three construction projects. The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (the Board) conducted a review, including public input and information requests. The Consumer Advocate initially intended to intervene but later opted out. The Board approved the applications, finding the projects necessary and the affiliate transaction with Emera Utility Services justified.

CI# 38819 - 51V Tremont Circuit Breaker & Bus $7,452,511 CI# 33525 - Canaan Road 43V to Tremont 51V Line $8,016,435 CI# 11004 - Canaan Road Circuit Breaker Additions $1,990,631 In view of the cost of the project and the decision of NSPI to...

AI summary The document lists several capital infrastructure projects with associated costs and notes that NSPI plans to have some work done by its affiliate, EUS. The Board is considering public review for this request due to the project's cost and the involvement of an affiliate.

CI# 38819 - 51V Tremont Circuit Breaker & Bus $7,452,511 CI# 33525 - Canaan Road 43V to Tremont 51V Line $8,016,435 CI# 11004 - Canaan Road Circuit Breaker Additions $1,990,631 NSPI has determined that a portion of the work on these capita...

AI summary NSPI has determined that a portion of the work on several capital projects will be carried out by Emera Utility Services, an affiliated company. The projects include the Tremont Circuit Breaker & Bus, Canaan Road 43V to Tremont 51V Line, and Canaan Road Circuit Breaker Additions, with associated costs totaling over $17 million.

The following IRs are for CI#33525 Canaan Road 43V to Tremont 51V line IR-1: - Reference estimate for Contracts. - a) Please provide details on the derivation of the capital cost estimate for Contracts. Include in your response a breakdown...

AI summary The document contains three information requests (IRs) related to a capital project (CI#33525) involving the Canaan Road 43V to Tremont 51V line. The requests address capital cost estimates, workforce planning models, and the implications of an expiring contract with EUS. The Board is seeking clarification on how the project aligns with regulatory requirements and the impact of potential contract changes.

ORDER WHEREAS Nova Scotia Power Incorporated ("NSPI") filed applications on July 27, 2010, with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (the "Board") for approval of Work Orders CI# 38819 - 51V Tremont Circuit Breaker & Bus in the amount...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board approved NSPI's applications for three work orders related to electrical infrastructure improvements. The Board considered the project costs and the involvement of the affiliate Emera Utility Services, but found no evidence of unjustifiable costs. The Consumer Advocate initially intended to intervene but later opted not to take an active role in the proceeding.