Topic:"Affordability" in M03097

3.1.1.25. Division A NBC and NPC 3.2 Functional Statements Add the following functional statement to Division A Sentence 3.2.1.1.(1) F 130 To limit excessive water consumption. F 131 To limit excessive energy consumption.

AI summary The text adds two functional statements to Division A Sentence 3.2.1.1.(1): F 130 to limit excessive water consumption and F 131 to limit excessive energy consumption.

Request IR-19: 2 3 1 Reference Capital Cost Breakdown Table 4 5 Insurance, AFUDC, Duty and A/O 6 7 a) Please provide the cost estimate of each of the above items. Provide the amount included in the original estimate, the ATO, and the amoun...

AI summary The document requests a breakdown of capital costs, including insurance, AFUDC, duty, and A/O, and an explanation of how delayed spending affects AFUDC. The response refers to a table for detailed cost estimates.

James A. MacDuff Direct 902.444.8619 [email protected] Purdy's Wharf Tower II 1300-1969 Upper Water Street PO Box 730 Halifax NS Canada B3J 2V1 Tel 902.425.6500 Fax 902.425.6350 Our File: G-2907 July 22, 2010 Ms. Nancy McN...

AI summary NPB submits concerns regarding NSPI's ATO application for the Tufts Cove 6 project, citing prior economic concerns and rising equipment costs. The Board's 2008 approval was conditional on completing the project at or below $84.296 million.

General All of the decisions for this Project were made with the technical information available at the time and were considered by teams consisting of design engineers, operating engineers, maintenance staff, and suppliers' technical supp...

AI summary NSPI defended project decisions that preserved a 2010 in-service date, arguing they minimized delays, maintained customer savings, and ensured prudence in cost recovery. Avon challenged cost exceedances, but NSPI cited prudence and customer benefits. Fuel savings and operational cost reductions were central to the dispute.

VI CONCLUSION - [71] Consequently, the Board approves this ATO request in the amount of $8,699,864, for a total Project cost of $92,996,628. - [72] An Order will issue accordingly. DATED at Halifax, Nova Scotia, this 22nd day of November,...

AI summary The Board approves an ATO request of $8,699,864, bringing the total project cost to $92,996,628. An Order will be issued to formalize this approval, dated November 22, 2010.

By Email Dear Participants: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - TUC6 Waste Heat Recovery Project - CI# 28098 - Authority to Overspend (ATO) - P-128.07 On May 3, 2010, Nova Scotia Power Inc. ("NSPI") submitted to the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Boa...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. submitted an ATO application for the TUC6 Waste Heat Recovery Project in 2010. The Board established a timetable for reviewing the application, including deadlines for information requests, responses, and written submissions from participants.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 Please provide an estimate of the benefits to NSPI customers 2010 that have been iost due in 3 to NSPI's failure to achieve the commercial operation date for the project that was forecast in 4 the original Application...

AI summary The document requests an estimate of the benefits to NSPI customers in 2010 that have been lost due to NSPI's failure to achieve the commercial operation date for a project forecasted in the original Application dated September 2007 (i.e., June 2010).

IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and- I"'~ THE MATTER OF A"'~ APPLICATION by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for Authority to Overspend (ATO) - TUC6 Waste Heat Recovery Project - CI#28098 BEFORE: Roberta J. Clarke, a.c., Member C...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated applied for authority to overspend on the TUC6 Waste Heat Recovery Project. The application was approved by the board on November 22, 2010, following a hearing on October 22, 2010.