E-3ENSC 2011 DSM Evaluation Report prepared by Econoler
141 passages
for each of the programs. Note that the numbering of the recommendations corresponds to the numbering presented in the individual reports. 4.1 RESIDENTIAL 4.1.1 Appliance Retirement Program The 2011 evaluation of the ARet program demonstra...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program showed high participation and significant energy savings. However, participants and the DA suggested improvements in marketing and outreach, citing challenges with the third-party marketing agency's lack of expertise and understanding of program goals.
the following recommendations that aim at optimizing specific aspects of the program: Table 13: Recommendations for the Appliance Retirement Program No. Recommendations
AI summary The text introduces a table outlining recommendations for the Appliance Retirement Program, aiming to optimize specific aspects of the program.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation ECONOL:R Overall Executive Summary ARet-R4 Conduct on-site metering for dehumidifiers and room air conditioners: The metering conducted at the recycling facility included the consumption measurement of 29...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of an appliance retirement program (ARET) and an appliance replacement program (ARep) in Nova Scotia. It highlights the limitations of metering data collected at a recycling facility and recommends on-site metering during the summer in homes. The ARep program achieved energy and demand savings in 2011 through refrigerator and freezer replacements.
viewed the unitary savings estimates, using the metering data from the ARet program and the theoretical energy consumption of the new models installed, based on the ENERGY STAR-qualified product list. As for the process evaluation of the A...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Replacement Program (ARep) highlights the importance of offering financing options to overcome barriers to purchasing large quantities of appliances. Retailers expressed high satisfaction with the program, but noted that upfront payment requirements limited participation. Recommendations include improving access to upfront capital for landlords.
a DA, Summerhill Group. An external call center, a transportation service and a recycler also acted as program partners in 2011 since the units were sent to be recycled once removed from the premises. The program aimed at achieving net ele...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program showed high participation and significant energy savings, with 8,211 units retired and 7.175 GWh of net energy savings. Awareness through advertising was a key factor in program success, though participants suggested improvements in marketing.
gram success in 2011. However, participants still believe that improvements are possible. Indeed, when asked on recommendations to improve the program, participants first mentioned better advertising. Despite the DA’s involvement in progra...
AI summary Participants in the ARet program expressed high satisfaction, with 96% satisfied and 98% willing to recommend it. However, improvements were suggested, particularly in advertising and marketing, as well as providing more information on appliance recycling. Collaboration with a third-party marketing agency was cited as a challenge.
ir satisfaction with the program. Moreover, almost all participants (98%) reported that they would recommend the ARet program to a friend or family member, which is a strong indicator of satisfaction. The program partners interviewed were...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement (ARet) program received high satisfaction ratings from participants, with 98% willing to recommend it. Program partners were also satisfied, though a transport contractor suggested improving the tracking system for appliance units. The program's net savings were calculated by Econoler, taking into account free-ridership and internal spillover effects, resulting in a 22% free-ridership level.
: Distortion Effects and Net-to-Gross Ratio 2011 Free-Ridership Level 22% Spillover Level 1% Net-to-Gross Ratio 0.79 The evaluation revealed that the ARet program had generated net energy savings of 7.175 GWh and demand savings of 1.144 MW...
AI summary The ARet program achieved net energy savings of 7.175 GWh and demand savings of 1.144 MW in 2011. These savings exceeded the tracked savings by ENSC by 71%, largely due to revised unitary savings values based on metering data and studies from Ontario.
ir degradation over the time. For dehumidifiers and room air conditioners, Econoler used the results from a metering study conducted in Ontario for the evaluation of the Every Kilowatt Counts program. The net-to-gross ratio was evaluated a...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Retirement Program found that it works well overall. The net-to-gross ratio was evaluated at 0.79, slightly higher than what was used in the tracking sheet. Econoler used results from an Ontario metering study for the evaluation.
ng. Moreover, marketing and advertising should be oriented towards the main program barrier identified, which is the reluctance to dispose of an appliance that still works. ARet-R2. Ensure that all information necessary for evaluation purp...
AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of marketing strategies targeting the reluctance to dispose of functional appliances and outlines the need for comprehensive data collection in tracking sheets for program evaluation, including specific appliance details like capacity and energy consumption metrics.
least the capacity, in litres per day, for dehumidifiers and in Btu per hour for room air conditioners, which is a key determinant of energy consumption for those appliances. ARet-R3. Pursue the metering of refrigerators and freezers at th...
AI summary The document discusses the importance of metering energy consumption for retired appliances, specifically refrigerators, freezers, dehumidifiers, and room air conditioners, to accurately calculate energy savings. It recommends continuing this approach for future evaluations.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report the results obtained from this metering study could not be used in this evaluation. Econoler suspected that the environment conditions at the recycling facility were not representat...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the Appliance Retirement Program, which expanded from Halifax and Cape Breton to all of Nova Scotia in 2011. The program allows the retirement of old appliances, including room air conditioners, provided they are in working order and over 10 years old. However, the report notes that results from a metering study were not usable due to environmental differences between recycling facilities and homes.
refrigerators, freezers and dehumidifiers, participants can now retire room air conditioner units. In order to be eligible, all appliances must be plugged in, in working order and older than 10 years. Participants can register to have thei...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement Program (ARET) allows participants to retire old appliances, offering rebates and free recycling. The program exceeded its 2010 target and achieved significant electricity and demand savings. It involves a delivery agent and sub-contractors for appliance pickup and recycling.
am logic model below shows the causal links between program activities and the changes expected in the market. Figure 1: Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Logic Model Ref.: 5725 2 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement P...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology used in the 2011 evaluation of the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program. It includes a logic model showing causal links between program activities and market changes, as well as a methodological model with research tools and data sources such as the ENSC website, previous evaluation reports, and program manuals.
obtained from the following four sources: > ENSC website; > 2010 evaluation report; > program manual; and > tracking sheet. 2.2.2 In-Depth Interview with Program Manager Econoler staff conducted one interview in September with the Program...
AI summary The document outlines the data collection methods used in the evaluation of a program, including sources such as the ENSC website, evaluation reports, and interviews with the Program Manager and program partners. On-site visits were also conducted to gather information on appliance retirements through the ARet program.
thodology used for the on-site visits for the ARet program is further explained in the program impact evaluation section of this report. A copy of the site visit protocol is included in Appendix VII. Ref.: 5725 4 Efficient Products – Appli...
AI summary The report discusses the methodology used for on-site visits in the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program and mentions a participant survey conducted by Econoler’s subcontractor, Corporate Research Associates, Inc. (CRA), in 2011. The survey aimed to understand participant experiences and program impact.
lephone surveys. Table 3: Sample Size and Sampling Error 2010 2011 Sampling Error at Sampling Error at Sample Sample Population 90% Confidence Population 90% Confidence Size (n) Size (n) Interval Interval Refrigerators 2,341 36 +13.6% 4,02...
AI summary The table presents sample sizes and sampling errors for refrigerator, freezer, and dehumidifier participants in an appliance retirement program in 2010 and 2011. It notes that appliance categories are not mutually exclusive and that the total population includes 6,596 participants across all appliance types.
y on the three most important appliances: refrigerators, freezers and room air conditioners. Considering all appliance types, the total population of participants in the program amounts to 6,596. Ref.: 5725 5 Efficient Products – Appliance...
AI summary The document outlines the process evaluation of the Appliance Retirement Program (ARet) conducted by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), focusing on assessing the program's design and delivery effectiveness through interviews and surveys. It also discusses the content of the ARet program manual used by program staff and evaluators.
nt process flow chart Program forms Information included in the program manual Information partially included in the program manual No information Econoler has analyzed the ARet program manual. It contains relevant information useful for b...
AI summary Econoler has reviewed the ARet program manual and found it to be useful but recommends improvements, such as providing a 'base case' for savings calculations and documenting parameters used to estimate program objectives. These changes would enhance validation and updating of the program's assumptions.
Furthermore, the content of all program manuals should be standardized based on the same template so that it is easier to locate specific sections or subjects. 3.3 PROGRAM TRACKING SHEET Econoler reviewed the content of the tracking sheet...
AI summary The document discusses the need for standardizing program manuals and reviews the appliance retirement program tracking sheet. Econoler finds the tracking sheet useful but notes areas for improvement, including inconsistent data entry and the presence of appliances under the age limit.
corrected by the recycler once it is at the plant. Therefore, since it remains relatively low, Econoler accepts the fact that a few appliances under the age limitation of the program can slip through. Estimated annual energy consumptions a...
AI summary The document outlines the methodology used by the recycler to estimate annual energy consumption for retired appliances, including the use of EnerGuide ratings, historical data, and extrapolation for older models. It also notes that some appliances may slip through the program's age limitations.
difiers and room air conditioners, the average energy consumption value used in the tracking sheet was obtained through a two-hour consumption test conducted on dehumidifiers during the pilot project. The program tracking sheet was also ev...
AI summary The program tracking sheet for appliance retirement was evaluated and found to be user-friendly. However, adjustments are recommended to improve consistency and evaluation accuracy. Unitary savings values derived from a 2011 metering study should be used and periodically adjusted to monitor energy savings effectively.
f months the appliance is used could also be useful in order to estimate the partial use factor for refrigerators and freezers and the annual usage of dehumidifiers and air conditioners. > Standardize the entries and fix limitations: To av...
AI summary The text discusses improving data entry processes for the Appliance Retirement Program by standardizing entries, using drop-down lists to reduce errors, and implementing validation processes to flag inconsistencies. It references a 2011 evaluation report by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 3.7.2 Participant Motivations and Concerns Four in 10 respondents (43%) decided to get rid of their appliance through the ARet program because the old unit was not working well. One...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses participant motivations for disposing of appliances through the ARET program, with 43% citing appliance malfunction, 32% no longer needing the appliance, and 21% aiming to reduce energy costs.
liance (12%), because of the rebate or incentive (12%) or because it was easy or convenient to turn it in (10%). Table 9: Why Participants Decided to Dispose of Appliance through the Program
AI summary The table outlines the reasons why participants disposed of appliances through the program, with the most common reasons being convenience, rebates, and ease of participation.
2010 2011 Reasons for Appliance Disposal Refrigerators Freezers Dehumidifiers Overall (%) (%) (#) (%) Sample Size 36 28 15 90 Old unit was not working well 6% 14% 3 43% Didn’t need it any more 3% 11% 1 32% Reduce energy/electricity costs 3...
AI summary The data presents the reasons for appliance disposal in 2010 and 2011, highlighting that the most common reasons were buying a new appliance and receiving a rebate or incentive. Other factors include convenience, environmental concerns, and cost considerations.
6% 3 Reduce maintenance costs/appliance 4% needed repairs Other 8% 1% Don’t know/refused 3% 2% Multiple responses Ref.: 5725 15 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Jus...
AI summary The evaluation report indicates that 53% of respondents believe retired appliances are recycled, 20% believe hazardous materials are eliminated, and 22% do not know what happens to the appliances after collection. The program should improve communication about appliance disposal.
gram are recycled. However, the program should communicate the information related to appliance disposal since a significant proportion of participants still do not know about this program component. Table 10: Appliance Disposal Appliance...
AI summary The program's appliance disposal component has low awareness, with many participants not knowing about it. Only 2% of respondents had concerns prior to participation, and survey results suggest no significant barriers to participation, though reluctance to dispose of functional devices remains a challenge.
ated that participants found it easy to participate. As mentioned in the program manual, the main program barrier among consumers is related to the reluctance to dispose of a device that still works. Table 11: Concerns prior to Taking part...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses concerns and participation barriers in the Appliance Retirement Program, noting that only 2% of participants had concerns, while 97% did not. It also highlights that over half of those who had a refrigerator removed had a second refrigerator, and 4% had a non-functional one.
spondents, removed a refrigerator that was neither being used at all nor plugged in. This result will be taken into consideration in the partial use factor presented in the impact evaluation section. Table 12: Use of Removed Refrigerators...
AI summary The text discusses the use of removed refrigerators and the amount of time appliances were plugged in, based on data from 2010 and 2011. It notes that most removed refrigerators were either used as primary or secondary appliances, and that most respondents had their appliances plugged in all the time or occasionally.
had the appliance plugged in all the time while the majority of those with a dehumidifier had it plugged in occasionally. Table 13: Amount of Time Appliance was Plugged In 2010 2011 Time Plugged In Refrigerators Freezers Dehumidifiers Refr...
AI summary The text discusses the usage patterns of appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, and dehumidifiers, noting that most refrigerators were plugged in all the time, while dehumidifiers were used occasionally. It also mentions that most appliances were in working condition when participants decided to retire them through the Appliance Retirement Program.
eport The majority of appliances were in working condition when participants decided to have them picked up through the program. Table 14: Condition of Appliances 2010 2011 Refrigerators Freezers Dehumidifiers Refrigerators Freezers Dehumi...
AI summary The report indicates that most appliances were in working condition when participants opted to retire them through the program. A significant portion of participants who retired appliances have since replaced them, highlighting potential trends in appliance replacement behaviors.
ho retired a dehumidifier also ended up acquiring a new unit. It is to be noted that 23 percent of participants who retired a refrigerator that was not a primary refrigerator have since replaced it. Table 15: Replacement of Appliances 2010...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses appliance replacement rates among participants in the Appliance Retirement Program. It notes that 23% of participants who retired a non-primary refrigerator replaced it, and 33% of those who replaced a refrigerator used a second-hand model. Most replaced appliances were new models.
). The proportion of respondents who replaced their refrigerators with a new appliance is the same among participants who have replaced their main refrigerator (67%) or secondary refrigerator (67%). Table 16: Replacement Appliance – New or...
AI summary The report discusses the replacement of refrigerators and freezers under the Appliance Retirement Program, noting that 67% of participants replaced their appliances with new ones. Sears is the most commonly mentioned retailer for purchases, with other sources including friends, relatives, Costco, and online platforms.
Table 17: Where Replacement Appliance was Purchased Replacement 2010 2011 Purchased Refrigerators Freezers Dehumidifiers Refrigerators Freezers Dehumidifiers (%) (#) (#) (%) (%) (#) Sample Size 20 14 7 24 23 7 Sears 50% 5 3 46% 30% 3 Frien...
AI summary Table 17 presents data on where replacement appliances were purchased in 2010 and 2011, showing the percentage and number of respondents who bought refrigerators, freezers, and dehumidifiers from various sources such as Sears, friends/relatives, Costco, and others.
13% 4% Don’t know/ 1 refused Base: Respondents that replaced appliances retired through the program Ref.: 5725 20 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Among respondents...
AI summary The report discusses appliance replacement under the Appliance Retirement Program, noting that most respondents who replaced retired appliances selected ENERGY STAR®-qualified products. The data shows high adoption rates of energy-efficient appliances in 2010 and 2011.
18% 13% 1 Base: Respondents who replaced appliances retired through the program Don’t know removed from calculations 3.7.5 Importance of Secondary Appliance Respondents who removed a secondary refrigerator or freezer through the program we...
AI summary The importance of secondary appliances, such as refrigerators and freezers, was assessed among respondents. While secondary refrigerators were considered less important (mean of 2.2 out of 5), freezers were seen as more important (mean of 3.8 out of 5). These findings suggest that secondary appliances play a significant role in consumer behavior and may explain reluctance to replace working appliances.
ppliance retired through the program (see Section 3.7.4), indicate the importance of secondary appliances for consumers. It could also explain consumer reluctance to get rid of a working appliance. Table 19: Importance of Secondary Refrige...
AI summary The table highlights the importance consumers place on secondary refrigerators and freezers, with a significant percentage considering them 'absolutely necessary.' This insight helps explain consumer reluctance to retire working appliances through the Appliance Retirement Program.
7% years old Don’t know/ 2% 1 1 refused Ref.: 5725 22 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report For respondents with freezers remaining, the freezer is generally less than f...
AI summary The report indicates that 81% of freezers remaining with respondents are less than five years old, suggesting a relatively new appliance base. This data may be relevant to appliance retirement programs and efficiency initiatives.
This result indicates that the participation process flow chart developed by ENSC in late 2011 was a good initiative as it will potentially simplify the participation of future program participants. Table 30: Diagram Illustrating Steps of...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for the Appliance Retirement Program (ARet) by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) assesses the program's impact on energy and demand savings. The report includes a flowchart developed in 2011 to improve future participant engagement and evaluates factors such as adjusted unitary savings, energy-to-demand ratio, and free-ridership.
on. To do so, Econoler reviewed the following parameters: > adjusted unitary savings; > energy-to-demand ratio; > interactive effects; > free-ridership; and > spillover. The review of the unitary savings calculations is mainly based on the...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program in 2011, focusing on parameters like unitary savings, free-ridership, and spillover effects. It also describes the sampling methodology for on-site visits and the types of appliances retired, with refrigerators being the most common.
ts. Econoler’s analysis revealed that refrigerators were the most frequently retired appliance followed by freezers. Table 31: Total Quantity and Energy Savings for Each Appliance Type Number of Units Evaluated Energy Savings Appliance Typ...
AI summary Econoler's analysis found that refrigerators and freezers were the most frequently retired appliances under the program, accounting for 88% of energy savings. A sampling method was used to ensure representation, selecting projects with at least one refrigerator or freezer in Halifax or Dartmouth. All retired appliances were surveyed, and new appliances were checked for ENERGY STAR compliance.
used appliance replaced the unit retired, specifications of this appliance were collected by the Evaluator to, among other things, determine whether the new appliance met ENERGY STAR specifications. Ref.: 5725 29 Efficient Products – Appli...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, noting that estimated savings for appliances are not tracked in the tracking sheet. Instead, the annual energy consumption of retired appliances is recorded, and a metering activity was conducted at the recycling facility to measure energy consumption using a protocol based on the New York Technical Resource Manual.
metering test of 26 hours. The table below presents the number of units tested for each appliance retired through the program. Table 32: Number of Appliances Metered Number of Units Number of Units Appliance Retired Tested Refrigerators 4,...
AI summary The document discusses the appliance retirement program, focusing on the number of units tested for each appliance type and the calculation of unitary savings values for refrigerators. It references a technical resource manual and outlines parameters considered in the evaluation process.
conoler reviewed the savings estimations used to monitor the gross savings generated by the refrigerators retired through the program. To do so, the following parameters were taken into consideration: > average consumption of refrigerators...
AI summary Econoler analyzed the average energy consumption of retired refrigerators using metering data, factoring in manufacture year and proportion of refrigerators in the tracking sheet to calculate an average annual consumption of 78.1 kWh per cubic foot.
ased on the manufacture year of the retired refrigerators monitored in the 2011 tracking sheet, these average values were weighted to establish an average consumption value of 78.1 kWh per cubic foot. The average size of the retired refrig...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report calculates the average annual energy consumption of retired refrigerators as 1,226 kWh based on their size and efficiency. It notes that metering data already account for efficiency degradation, eliminating the need for a degradation factor this year.
icipant survey was used to establish a replacement ratio. As mentioned in Section 3.7.4, from the participants who had secondary refrigerators retired through the program, 23 percent replaced them. Ref.: 5725 32 Efficient Products – Applia...
AI summary The report evaluates the replacement ratio of retired refrigerators under the Appliance Retirement Program. Primary refrigerators had a 100% replacement rate, while secondary refrigerators had a 23% replacement rate. Of those who replaced refrigerators, 67% opted for new models and 33% for used ones.
US et al., Residential Retrofit High Impact Measure Evaluation Report, February 8, 2010. 4 ENERGY STAR, Refrigerators Qualified Product List, www.energystar.gov, list posted on January 17, 2012. Ref.: 5725 33 Efficient Products – Appliance...
AI summary The document evaluates the energy consumption of replacement refrigerators under the Appliance Retirement Program. It references data from Natural Resources Canada and assumes that used refrigerators 5 to 10 years old still have market value and energy consumption levels similar to 2003 estimates.
ENERGY STAR 2008 NRCan 2003 NRCan Energy Consumption (kWh/yr) 363 479 487 By applying the percentages of refrigerators replaced by ENERGY STAR models and standard models, the average energy consumption for new refrigerators is equal to the...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of average energy consumption for new refrigerators, using ENERGY STAR and standard models, and the use of partial use factors for secondary refrigerators. It references data from Natural Resources Canada and outlines how Econoler estimated plug-in patterns for secondary refrigerators.
20% Never - 0 10% Partial Use Factor 1.00 0.85 0.74 Ref.: 5725 35 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Lab-to-on-Site Factor Energy consumption estimates from manufactu...
AI summary The document discusses the use of a lab-to-on-site factor to adjust energy consumption estimates for replacement refrigerators, based on manufacturer data. This factor accounts for real-world variables such as door openings and indoor temperature, with a value of 0.82 established in the 2010 evaluation of the California Appliance Retirement program.
nual consumption of the freezers retired through the program, Econoler used the data from the metering activity. In total, the annual energy consumption of 46 freezers was tested during this activity. In order to estimate an average consum...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Retirement Program analyzed the annual energy consumption of 46 retired freezers. The average consumption was calculated based on the freezers' manufacture years, resulting in an average of 82.6 kWh per cubic foot.
t Based on the manufacture year of the retired freezers monitored in the 2011 tracking sheet, these average values were weighted to establish an average consumption value of 82.6 kWh per cubic foot. The average size of the retired freezers...
AI summary The document calculates average energy consumption of retired freezers based on size and age, using a weighted average of 82.6 kWh per cubic foot and 13.6 cubic feet, resulting in 1,123 kWh/year. A 58% replacement rate was observed, with 82% of replacements being new freezers and 18% used models.
ulations. Average Consumption of Replacement Freezers According to the participant survey, when freezers were replaced, 82 percent were replaced with a new freezer and 18 percent with a used model. The same approach as with refrigerators w...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the average energy consumption of replacement freezers, noting that 82% of replacements were new freezers, with 87% of those being ENERGY STAR-qualified. Used freezers had higher energy consumption compared to new models. Energy consumption estimates were based on data from Natural Resources Canada.
ed Product List, www.energystar.gov, list posted on January 17, 2012. 12 Natural Resources Canada, Energy Consumption of Major Household Appliances Shipped in Canada, Trends from 1990- 2008, p.71. Ref.: 5725 40 Efficient Products – Applian...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of partial use factors for secondary freezers in the Appliance Retirement Program, using a sample size of 39 freezers. It also mentions the application of a lab-to-on-site factor of 0.82 for freezers, similar to the approach used for refrigerators.
n-Site Factor As with refrigerators, a lab-to-on-site factor must be applied to the consumption values estimated for replacement freezers. The same lab-to-on-site factor of 0.82 is used for freezers. For the retired freezers, no lab-to-on-...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings values for retired freezers under the Appliance Retirement Program. It outlines the application of lab-to-on-site factors and adjustments for metered consumption, similar to methods used for refrigerators.
or secondary – not replaced – freezers. Using the proportion of each category resulting from the participant survey, the average unitary savings value for freezers is estimated at 1,117 kWh per year. Ref.: 5725 42 Efficient Products – Appl...
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of energy savings from the Appliance Retirement Program, specifically focusing on freezers and dehumidifiers. Savings estimates are based on survey data and comparisons with new ENERGY STAR-qualified models.
he Ontario Power Authority’s 2008 Every Kilowatt Counts Power Savings Event, Keep Cool Pilot and Rewards for Recycling Programs, Final Report, Prepared for the Ontario Power Authority, July 9, 2009. Ref.: 5725 43 Efficient Products – Appli...
AI summary The document references an evaluation report on appliance retirement programs, comparing energy consumption estimates from different regions, including Wisconsin and Nova Scotia. It discusses the use of 1,114 annual operating hours for dehumidifiers in Nova Scotia, leading to an average annual consumption of 1,224 kWh for old dehumidifiers retired.
9, 2009. 16 Efficiency Vermont, Technical Reference User Manual (TRM), p. 305, 12/30/2008. 17 ENERGY STAR, Dehumidifier energy savings calculator, www.energystar.gov, assumption from EPA 2006. Ref.: 5725 44 Efficient Products – Appliance R...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Retirement Program estimates the average annual energy consumption of replacement dehumidifiers, assuming they were replaced with ENERGY STAR-qualified units. Based on ENERGY STAR eligibility criteria, the average consumption is estimated at 538 kWh per year.
880 kWh/yr 18 ENERGY STAR, Program Requirements for Dehumidifiers – Eligibility Criteria – version 3.0, http://www.energystar.gov/specifications. Ref.: 5725 45 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpor...
AI summary The document discusses the average annual energy savings of 880 kWh for dehumidifiers and the inclusion of room air conditioners in the Appliance Retirement Program. Due to distorted metering data, savings estimates for room air conditioners were based on a similar program's results.
tary savings value for room air conditioners using the evaluation results from a similar program: the OPA’s Every Kilowatt Counts program.19 Average Consumption of Retired Room Air Conditioner Units Based on the evaluation of the OPA’s 200...
AI summary This text discusses the evaluation of energy savings from retiring old room air conditioners, using data from the OPA’s Every Kilowatt Counts program. It outlines the average annual consumption of retired units and notes the challenge of determining replacement ratios due to limited survey data for room air conditioners.
average unitary savings value for room air conditioners based on the proportion of each category of participants. Table 44: Unitary Savings Value for Retired Room Air Conditioner Units Room Air Conditioner Unit Replaced Not Replaced Averag...
AI summary The document discusses the average unitary savings value for retired room air conditioners in Nova Scotia, estimated at 197 kWh per year. It also mentions the energy-to-demand ratio used for calculating demand savings in the ARET program, which is 6.27 GWh/MW.
1.1050 1.1050 1.1050 1.1050 Total Gross Demand Savings – at Generator (MW) 0.757 0.510 0.160 0.011 Ref.: 5725 49 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 4.3 INTERACTIVE EF...
AI summary The document discusses the interactive effects of replacing old appliances with energy-efficient ones in Nova Scotia, noting that while such replacements may increase heating loads in winter and decrease cooling loads in summer, the overall impact is considered insignificant by Econoler due to various factors.
ctors that affect interactive effects, Econoler concludes that the interactive effects for the ARet program are insignificant. Indeed, Econoler took into account the following factors in its analysis: > As part of this evaluation, the focu...
AI summary The analysis of the ARet program concludes that interactive effects are insignificant due to factors such as the limited impact on heating loads and the presence of air conditioning in some households. The net-to-gross ratio (NTGR) is calculated using a self-report approach and considers free-ridership and spillover effects to assess program participation.
2011 Evaluation Report the appliances retired through the in-store weekend events conducted during retail markdown campaigns, a free-ridership level of 0 percent will be used. The approach used by Econoler was consistent with evaluation, m...
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report discusses the methodology used to assess free-ridership and internal spillover effects of an appliance retirement program. Econoler's approach considers various factors influencing customer decision-making and uses participant surveys to measure internal spillover effects.
nergy and demand savings amount to 6.493 GWh and 1.036 MW at the meter, and 7.175 GWh and 1.144 MW at the generator. Table 47: Evaluation Results – Net Energy and Demand Savings Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) At the At the At the...
AI summary The text provides evaluation results showing energy and demand savings from appliance retirement programs, with 6.493 GWh and 1.036 MW saved at the meter, and 7.175 GWh and 1.144 MW saved at the generator. It also compares these savings to those from the 2011 tracking sheet.
Initial Gross NTGR Net Savings Savings Energy Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 5.661 GWh 0.74 4.189 GWh Evaluation Results 9.020 GWh 0.80 7.175 GWh Demand Savings Tracked Savings from ENSC 0.903 MW 0.74 0.668 MW Evaluation Results 1.439 M...
AI summary This report evaluates the Energy Savings and Demand Savings from the Appliance Retirement Program (ARET) and other efficiency initiatives by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) in 2011. Tracked and evaluated savings are presented, with a note on the NTGR used for different retirement methods.
rmation on the model, such as the capacity and the age of manufacture, and information on usage patterns by asking the participants during which seasons they operate their appliances and for how long. The NTGR was evaluated at 0.79 for the...
AI summary The evaluation of the Appliance Retirement Program discusses the Net Total Gross Replacement (NTGR) rates for appliances retired through the program and in-store events, as well as the assessment of free-ridership and interactive effects on home energy consumption. The NTGR was slightly higher than previously used, and free-ridership was estimated at 1 percent.
tified is the customers’ resistance to get rid of a working Implementation appliance. Econoler recommends that the marketing strategy be oriented towards that specific barrier. Ref.: 5725 56 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Progra...
AI summary The text discusses customer resistance to retiring functional appliances and suggests that the marketing strategy should address this specific barrier. It references an evaluation report on the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Program 9. Develop an evaluation plan in parallel with program design and Design and development: This program has no evaluation plan. Econoler strongly Implementation recommends that for each new program, an evaluation plan be prepared in...
AI summary The text highlights the need for an evaluation plan for a program, the importance of strengthening marketing strategies, communication about appliance disposal, and the pursuit of metering for refrigerators and freezers at the recycling facility to improve program effectiveness and participant engagement.
cling facility: Evaluation For refrigerators and freezers, the unitary savings calculation was based on metering data, which allowed taking into account the actual condition of the old appliances retired and their degradation over time. Fo...
AI summary The evaluation of appliance retirement programs suggests using metering data for refrigerators and freezers to calculate unitary savings, while recommending on-site metering for dehumidifiers and room air conditioners in homes during the summer to ensure accurate results.
arried out next summer in homes that operate old dehumidifiers and room air conditioners and that have manifested their desire to retire their old appliances Ref.: 5725 57 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova S...
AI summary The text discusses the demographics of participants in the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program, noting that most live in single-family detached homes, with a smaller number in other housing types.
000 to $79,999 7 4 $80,000 or more 24 23 Don’t know/refused 27 22 Six in 10 respondents are female (62%), while four in 10 are male (38%). Table 58: Gender Gender 2010 2011 Sample Size 70 90 Female 56% 62% Male 44 38 Ref.: 5725 61 Efficien...
AI summary The text includes demographic data on respondents, a table showing gender distribution in 2010 and 2011, and excerpts from an interview guide related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Questions focus on cost-effectiveness, municipal electrical distributors, and savings calculations when appliances are replaced.
he other program or calculate the net savings in this program? Q: If it is replaced by another unit not part of any other of your program do you still calculate the savings as if it was not replaced? C: Saturation - The cream skimming phen...
AI summary The text discusses questions and responses related to the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including eligibility criteria, verification methods, program separation, and issues like free ridership and cream skimming. It also references evaluation reports and program logic models.
s there a process flow chart for that program? The web site explains all the steps but there is no illustration. Q: was there an evaluation plan associated to that program when it was first designed? Q: Nowhere do we see the role of the de...
AI summary The document includes a series of questions and comments related to the evaluation and implementation of the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Questions focus on program design, evaluation plans, delivery processes, and barriers to customer participation.
evaluation? And if not why? Q: was there an evaluation plan when this program was first designed? Q: Is there a written marketing and outreach strategy for that program with performance indicators? Q: How would you rate the facility or dif...
AI summary The document includes a series of evaluation questions for the Appliance Retirement Program operated by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC), as well as an interview guide for program partners. The questions focus on program evaluation, marketing strategy, and ease of use of a centralized database.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Q4 – How would you qualify your participation process in this program? Simple or easy Complex Q4a - If you checked the Complex box, please elaborate. No comment / no opinion Q5- On...
AI summary The text presents a series of survey questions related to the efficiency program and appliance retirement program managed by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions about participation process, satisfaction ratings, suggestions for improvement, and outreach activities.
ou answered Yes to Q8, we would like your opinion on the frequency of these evaluations. Too frequent Adequate No opinion Part II: Questions Specific to the Appliance Retirement Program Q9 – We would like your opinion on the number of thir...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on stakeholder opinions regarding program frequency, number of third parties involved, market confusion, relationships with partners, and program name changes. It also includes evaluation scales and open-ended response opportunities.
n regard to the program name that has changed from ‘’Pull the Plug’’ to Appliance Retirement and Replacement Program (ARR) and to Appliance Retirement Program (ARet) since its first implementation? Q14- What is your opinion in regard to pr...
AI summary The text discusses the renaming of a program from 'Pull the Plug' to the Appliance Retirement and Replacement Program (ARR) and Appliance Retirement Program (ARet), and asks about program modifications, complaints from partners, and barriers to implementation. The document is an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
d we hope that they will contribute to improving program performance. If we need to clarify some of your answers, we might call you back. Your name Date Phone number with area code E-mail Ref.: 5725 71 Efficient Products – Appliance Retire...
AI summary This document is an interview guide for contractors involved in the Appliance Retirement Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It outlines the process for completing a questionnaire to evaluate program performance and includes instructions for submission.
re it changed status and name from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, how was this transition perceived in the market? Not applicable Unnoticed Some confusion A lot of confusion Don’t know Ref.: 5725 72 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the transition of the program from Conserve Nova Scotia to ENSC, the impact on relationships with the Program Administrator, participant satisfaction, and the complexity of the participation process in the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program.
our opinion on the number of third parties involved in this program other than you (delivery agent, transport contractor, call center). Are they? Too few Adequate Too many No opinion Q9a- If you answered Too Few or Too Many, please comment...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking about the number of third parties involved, market confusion, relationship ratings with program partners, lead sources, and opinions on program name changes and modifications.
m name (new territory, additional equipment, etc.)? Easy to adjust to the way you work Requires minor changes to the way you work Requires major changes to the way you work No opinion Ref.: 5725 76 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement...
AI summary This document contains a survey questionnaire from the 2011 Evaluation Report of the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions about program implementation barriers, complaints from partners, and participant feedback.
Y QUESTIONNAIRE Participant Survey ENSC 2011 Appliance Retirement Program Nov 2, 2011 SCREENING QUESTIONS Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] 2. No [SAY “Perhaps you can help me anyway.” GO TO INTRODUCTION] Hello,...
AI summary This document is a participant survey for the ENSC 2011 Appliance Retirement Program. It aims to gather feedback from participants who had old appliances removed and recycled in 2011. The survey is conducted by CRA on behalf of Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation and emphasizes confidentiality.
: _] In the past, the Appliance Retirement Program was known as “Pull the Plug”. Throughout the questionnaire, I will refer to it as the “Appliance Retirement Program”. You may know Nova Scotia Power as the sponsor of this program. However...
AI summary The document discusses the Appliance Retirement Program, formerly known as 'Pull the Plug', which was sponsored by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation starting in 2011. It includes a questionnaire verifying participation and the number of appliances retired in 2011.
y. Someone would have come to your home and picked up your old appliance. You would have received a $10 or $35 rebate also.”] IF PERSIST AS NO, THANK, TERMINATE AND RECORD. V2. [ASK IF V1=3] Let me clarify, I am talking about the Efficienc...
AI summary The text discusses the Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Appliance Retirement program, which involved removing and recycling refrigerators, freezers, and dehumidifiers from homes and providing rebates for participation. The text includes questions about the number of appliances picked up through the program.
98=Don’t Know, 99=Refused] V5. [IF V2c. = YES] How many dehumidifiers were picked up through the Appliance Retirement Program? [Record number, 98=Don’t Know, 99=Refused] Ref.: 5725 80 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Effic...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking about participation numbers and reasons for appliance disposal. It also references an evaluation report from 2011 and lists sources through which participants learned about the program.
– MULTIPLE RESPONSE) Age/Need 1. (Old unit was not working well) 2. (Didn’t need/use it any more) Replacing unit 3. (Bought new appliance) Ref.: 5725 81 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2...
AI summary The text outlines reasons for replacing appliances under the Appliance Retirement Program, including age, housing changes, financial incentives, logistical convenience, and environmental concerns. It also asks about concerns participants had before joining the program.
(Refused) P3. Before participating, did you have any concerns about taking part in the program? 1. (Yes) 2. (No) 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 82 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporat...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about participation concerns in the Appliance Retirement Program and what happens to retired appliances. It outlines responses such as concerns about appliance replacement, rebate amounts, and process complexity, as well as perceptions about appliance recycling and disposal.
move all environmentally hazardous materials, such as capacitors, mercury switches and refrigerants. Ninety-five percent of the unit is recycled including the metal, rubber, plastic and coolants.”] Ref.: 5725 83 Efficient Products – Applia...
AI summary The text outlines a survey conducted on the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, evaluating participant satisfaction and reasons for dissatisfaction, including issues with eligibility, sign-up process, and rebate timing.
READ. PROBE FOR SPECIFIC REASONS. ACCEPT MULTIPLE] S4. How did you initially sign up for the program? Did you sign up over the phone with a toll free number or did you sign up online? 1. (Over the phone) 2. (Signed up online) 3. (Both) 98....
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on how participants signed up, their experience with online and phone sign-up processes, and difficulties encountered. It also asks for recommendations to improve the program.
of your appliance(s). [MULTIPLE RESPONSE – RECORD VERBATIM] S7. Do you have any recommendations for improving the Appliance Retirement Program? PROBE: Anything else? 1. (Offer more products/measures eligible to rebates) 2. (Offer more info...
AI summary The document includes survey questions about the Appliance Retirement Program, asking for recommendations to improve it and whether a visual guide would have helped participants. It also references an evaluation report from Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation from 2011.
99. (Refused) [PROGRAMMER: EACH RESPONDENT WILL BE ASKED ABOUT ONE TO TWO APPLIANCES – NOT ALL THREE. NO RESPONDENT WILL BE ASKED ABOUT TWO OF A SAME APPLIANCE (E.G., NOT TWO REFRIGERATORS)]. Ref.: 5725 86 Efficient Products – Appliance Re...
AI summary The text outlines survey instructions for respondents in the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on refrigerator removals. It specifies that respondents will be asked about one or two appliances, not all three, and ensures no respondent is asked about two of the same appliance. It also provides clarification on how to classify the removed refrigerator as main, secondary, or unused.
.” [NOTE: If respondent recently bought a new refrigerator and was just waiting for the previously used one to be picked up by the program, it should be classified as “Main/Primary”] 1. Used as Main/Primary 2. Used as a Spare/Secondary at...
AI summary This text outlines a survey related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on the status and age of removed refrigerators, including whether they were primary, secondary, or unused.
USED AS A SECONDARY REFRIGERATOR?’ RECORD] 99. (Refused) RF4. [IF RF1 = 3] Approximately how long had the refrigerator been unused when you decided to get rid of it? [RECORD] 1. Months [RECORD 1 to 11 months] 2. Years [RECORD 1 to 50 years...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to the retirement of a refrigerator under an appliance retirement program, focusing on how long the appliance was unused, its condition, and its usage prior to retirement.
2011 Evaluation Report RF8. Where in the house was the refrigerator most recently located? [RANDOMIZE AND READ 1- 5, THEN 96 – CHECK ONLY ONE] 1. Basement 2. Kitchen 3. Garage 4. Porch 5. Laundry room 96. Some other place [SPECIFY _] 98. (...
AI summary The text contains survey questions from a 2011 evaluation report regarding the location of refrigerators and participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Appliance Retirement Program. It includes questions about disposal methods and considerations prior to the program.
g to read a list of alternative ways that you could have disposed of this appliance. For each, tell me if this is a method you had considered using or doing. [RANDOMIZE] Did you consider … a. Selling it 1.Yes - Considered 2. No – Did not c...
AI summary The text presents a list of alternative methods for disposing of an appliance, asking respondents whether they considered each method. It includes options such as selling, recycling, donating, and storing the appliance.
d 2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99.Refused j. Postponing getting rid of it. 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99.Refused Ref.: 5725 90 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Sco...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program, asking respondents how they would have disposed of an old refrigerator if the program had not been available and how long they would have postponed disposal.
Responses a. The $35 incentive provided _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused by Efficiency Nova Scotia b. Information or advice _ Response _98 Don’t Know _99 Refused received from the program c. Removal and recycling services provided for...
AI summary The text discusses responses to questions about the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program, including incentives, information received, and removal and recycling services. It also asks about willingness to pay for refrigerator removal and includes questions about replacing the retired appliance.
e replacement refrigerator new or used when you started using it as the replacement refrigerator? 1. New 2. Used 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) RE3. Where did you get the replacement refrigerator? [DON’T READ] 1. (Sears) 2. (Home Depot) 3....
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to refrigerator replacement, including whether the refrigerator is new or used, where it was purchased, and if it has the ENERGY STAR label. It also includes a section about remaining refrigerators in use after program participation.
refrigerator through the program? [RECORD NUMBER] _ [98 Don’t know, 99 Refused] [IF 0 GO TO FZ1 (Freezer Series)]. IF ‘DON’T KNOW’ OR ‘REFUSED’ TO RRF1, SKIP TO FZ SERIES RRF2a through RRF2c. [FOR EACH REFRIGERATOR IN RRF1, ASK “Approximat...
AI summary The text outlines a survey process for participants in the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on refrigerator and freezer removals. It includes instructions for data collection, such as determining the age of refrigerators and selecting one freezer for detailed questioning.
alone freezer removed through the program. For purposes of this survey, pick just one of the freezers removed and keep just that one freezer clearly in your mind as you answer the next few questions. FZ1. In the year prior to getting rid o...
AI summary This text contains survey questions from an appliance retirement program evaluation, specifically focusing on freezer removal. It asks participants about the usage frequency, age, and condition of the freezer prior to removal.
99. (Refused) FZ8. Is the space where the freezer was located heated in the winter? 1. Yes 2. No 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) Ref.: 5725 96 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluat...
AI summary The text includes survey questions related to the location of a freezer and its disposal, focusing on whether the freezer was located in a heated or cooled space and whether the respondent had considered disposing of it prior to learning about the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99. Refused c. Taking it to a recycling center 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Consider 98. Don’t Know _ 99.Refused d. Hiring someone to take it for recycling 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Cons...
AI summary This text presents a survey question about disposal options for an appliance and asks respondents to indicate which alternative they would have most likely used if the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program was not available.
this freezer had not been available. Which one of these other alternatives that we’ve just discussed would you have been most likely to do? (DO NOT READ; INDICATE ONE RESPONSE ONLY) IF NEEDED: Your best estimate is okay. 1. (Sold it) 2. (G...
AI summary This text is a survey question related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, asking respondents about their disposal plans for an old freezer if the program had not been available, and how soon they would have disposed of it if the program had taken it.
Program took it or more than a year later? 1. Within a year of when the program took it 2. More than a year later 98. (Don’t Know) 99. (Refused) FFR5. Efficiency Nova Scotia paid for the freezer to be removed from your home and recycled. T...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on participant experiences with freezer removal and recycling, including timing, cost perception, and the importance of various program factors.
w old is your freezer.” [IF MORE THAN ONE FREEZER, ASK ABOUT UP TO THREE FREEZERS INSERTING “first”, “second,” or “third” BEFORE “freezer” AS APPROPRIATE, BASED ON RFZ1 RESPONSE.] 1. 0 to 5 years old 2. 6 to 10 years old 3. 11 to 15 years...
AI summary The text is part of a survey related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes questions about the age and usage frequency of freezers and dehumidifiers removed through the program.
4. Never 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) DH2. Approximately how old was the dehumidifier you had removed through the program? Was it [READ, CHECK ONE]: 1. 0 to 5 years old 2. 6 to 10 years old 3. 11 to 15 years old 4. 16 to 20 years old 5....
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks about the age, usage, and condition of dehumidifiers removed through the program.
ong had you been using the dehumidifier when you decided to get rid of it? 1. Months [RECORD 1 to 11 months] 2. Years [RECORD 1 to 50 years, round to the nearest year (Don’t know) [PROBE: ‘CAN YOU GIVE AN APPROXIMATE LENGTH OF TIME THAT TH...
AI summary The text is part of a survey related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, focusing on dehumidifier free-ridership. It asks participants about the duration of use, location, and whether they had considered disposing of the dehumidifier before learning about the program.
tive ways that you could have disposed of this appliance. For each, tell me if this is a method you had considered using or doing. [RANDOMIZE] Did you consider … a. Selling it 1.Yes - Considered 2. No – Did not consider 98. Don’t Know _ 99...
AI summary This text is part of an evaluation report for Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Retirement Program. It asks respondents about methods they considered for disposing of an appliance, including selling, recycling, and storing it.
on’t Know _ 99.Refused i. Storing it unplugged 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99.Refused j. Postponing getting rid of it. 1.Yes - Considered 2.No – Did not Consider 98.Don’t Know _ 99.Refused DFR3. Now suppose t...
AI summary The text discusses a survey question about appliance disposal alternatives, specifically focusing on the Efficiency Nova Scotia Appliance Retirement Program and how respondents would have handled their old dehumidifier if the program had not been available. It also asks about the timing of disposal if they had postponed getting rid of the appliance.
ting rid of your dehumidifier. How soon would you have disposed of your old dehumidifier? Would you have disposed if it within a year of when the Program took it or more than a year later? 1. Within a year of when the program took it 2. Mo...
AI summary The text presents survey questions about the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on customer behavior regarding the disposal of dehumidifiers, likelihood of paying for recycling, and the importance of program incentives and information in decision-making.
as the replacement dehumidifier? 1. New 2. Used 98. (Don’t know) 99. (Refused) DHE3. Where did you get the replacement dehumidifier? [DON’T READ] 1. (Sears) 2. (Home Depot) 3. (Best Buy) 4. (Lowe’s) 5. (Wal-Mart) 6. (Target) 7. (Sam’s Club...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to dehumidifier replacement and usage, including where respondents obtained their replacement dehumidifier and whether it has an ENERGY STAR label. It also includes a question about the number of stand-alone dehumidifiers currently in use.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report [GO TO IM1 IF SO1=2 OR 98 OR 99] SO2. What other appliance(s) have you disposed of WITHOUT RECEIVING A REBATE since participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia’s Appliance retirement pr...
AI summary The text presents survey questions from Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2011 Evaluation Report, asking participants about additional appliances disposed of without a rebate and the influence of the Appliance Retirement Program on their decision.
ram was “extremely influential to your decision to dispose of this or these additional appliance(s).” [RECORD RESPONSE 0-10, 98 = Don’t know, 99 = REFUSED] [DO NOT ACCEPT A RANGE] Ref.: 5725 110 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Pr...
AI summary The text outlines survey questions from an evaluation report on the Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It asks participants about changes in energy costs, knowledge, and negative consequences of appliance removal, as well as whether they would recommend the program to others.
contact: Appliance Number of Units Retired Date of Retirement Database Info Validation Database Info Validation Refrigerators: To be competed To be competed Stand-Alone Freezers: To be competed To be competed Dehumidifiers: To be competed...
AI summary The text provides a template for reporting the retirement of various appliances, including refrigerators, freezers, dehumidifiers, and room air conditioners, along with details about their replacement and usage patterns. It is part of an evaluation report for an appliance retirement program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation.
Occasionally Never Time For a secondary refrigerator replaced: For a secondary refrigerator not replaced: Ref.: 5725 116 Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report New Refrig...
AI summary This document contains forms and information related to the Efficient Products – Appliance Retirement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation, including details about refrigerator and freezer replacements, energy consumption, and program evaluation.
2011 Evaluation Report 2.2 FREEZERS (IF APPLICABLE) Replacement Information (site contact declaration) Number of stand-alone freezers retired: Number replaced with a new freezer: Number replaced with a used freezer: Number not replaced at...
AI summary The text outlines forms and data collection procedures for appliance retirement programs, specifically focusing on freezers and dehumidifiers. It includes fields for replacement information, secondary freezer usage, and dehumidifier usage, indicating a structured evaluation process.
rning about the program, had you already considered IF 1. Yes: FR1 = 100% disposing of the refrigerator? IF 2 OR 9 : FR1 = 0% FR3. In the absence of the program, which alternative would you have been most likely to do? IF 1. : FR3 = 0% 1....
AI summary The text presents a survey question about refrigerator disposal, asking respondents whether they had considered disposing of the refrigerator before a program and what alternative they would have taken in its absence. It includes conditional scoring based on the responses.
IF 10. : FR3 = 0% 99. (Don’t Know / Refused) PA1 Score: FR3 FR5. ENSC paid for your appliance to be removed from your home and recycled. If you had not received these services for free, how likely is it FR5 = Answer x 10% that you would ha...
AI summary The text outlines a survey with questions related to appliance recycling, including willingness to pay for recycling services and the influence of the program on participants' decisions. It includes scoring mechanisms for responses and factors influencing program participation.
ogic Model ........................................ 2 Figure 2: Methodological Model .............................................................................................................. 3 Ref.: 5725 iii Efficient Products – Appli...
AI summary The 2011 evaluation of the Appliance Replacement (ARep) program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) found that the rebate structure was simplified from a sliding scale to a flat $200 rebate. The program allowed multi-unit residential building owners to replace old refrigerators with ENERGY STAR®-qualified units, with Gallery 1 acting as the preferred retailer offering additional rebates.
the addition of a field to validate the ENERGY STAR criterion and to identify the energy consumption of the appliance would ensure that savings are calculated correctly. Ref.: 5725 vi Efficient Products – Appliance Replacement Program Effi...
AI summary The Appliance Replacement Program, launched in 2011, aimed to replace old refrigerators in multi-unit residential buildings with ENERGY STAR®-qualified units. Incentives were initially based on a sliding scale but were later changed to a flat $200 rebate. The program also partnered with a retailer, transportation service, and recycler to facilitate the replacement and disposal of old appliances.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report 2.2.4 On-Site Visits In November, two on-site visits were conducted at multi-unit residential buildings in which appliances had been replaced through the ARep program. In each multi...
AI summary This section of the 2011 Evaluation Report discusses on-site visits conducted in November at multi-unit residential buildings where appliances were replaced through the Appliance Replacement Program (AREP). The visits aimed to validate the installation and characteristics of new refrigerators and were conducted by a subcontractor of Econoler.
ormation, was useful and complete. Except for a few missing postal codes, all the customer information necessary for conducting field activities (surveys and on-site visits) was present in this sheet. The second sheet, which provided infor...
AI summary The document describes the tracking sheet used for the appliance replacement program, highlighting the completeness of customer information and technical data on refrigerators, with some missing details affecting the verification of ENERGY STAR compliance.
eet also contains a field that refers to the age of the unit retired. This field is essential to validate that the refrigerators replaced under the program are older than ten years, which is one of Ref.: 5725 8 Efficient Products – Applian...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses the Appliance Replacement Program's tracking sheet, noting that while it meets basic monitoring needs, it lacks energy savings monitoring. The report recommends adding a field for average unitary savings values to improve evaluation accuracy.
g sheet. The gross savings calculation is made by using an average unitary savings value for each refrigerator replaced. ENSC estimates this value at 437 kWh, based on the 2010 ARep evaluation report. In 2011, an important project was held...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of unitary savings for refrigerator replacements under the Appliance Replacement Program. ENSC uses an average unitary savings value of 437 kWh, based on a 2010 evaluation report. Adjustments were made using a lab-to-on-site factor of 0.79 derived from the California Appliance Retirement Program.
cture year. Based on the manufacture year of the old refrigerators in the ARep program tracking sheet, Econoler calculated an average annual consumption value of 58.7 kWh/cu ft for old refrigerators. Table 3: Metering Data for Retired Refr...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of average annual energy consumption for old refrigerators in the Appliance Replacement Program (AREP) based on data from the ARep program tracking sheet. Econoler calculated an average annual consumption of 986 kWh for old refrigerators, which is used for unitary savings calculations in the program.
usie University, Econoler calculated an average annual consumption value of 64.4 kWh/cu ft for old freezers. Table 5: Metering Data for Retired Freezers from the Appliance Recycling Facility Average Annual Consumption Proportion in the ARe...
AI summary Econoler calculated the average annual consumption of old freezers based on data from the Appliance Recycling Facility, finding an average of 64.4 kWh/cu ft. This data was used to evaluate the Low Income Appliance Replacement Program and assess energy efficiency improvements.
per Freezer 637 kWh As a result, Econoler applied the average unitary savings value of 637 kWh to the freezers replaced through the program. Mini-Fridges A total of 86 mini-fridges were replaced through the special project in Dalhousie Uni...
AI summary The document discusses energy savings calculations for appliance replacements, specifically freezers and mini-fridges, using the ENERGY STAR federal standard. Econoler applied average unitary savings values to estimate energy consumption differences between old and new units, with a focus on efficiency improvements.
rs. The on-site visits revealed that all new refrigerators had been installed in accordance with the data found in the tracking sheet. Hence, the installation rate for the ARep program is 100 percent. The on-site visits were also used to v...
AI summary The on-site visits confirmed 100% installation rate for the ARep program, but found that some refrigerators did not meet ENERGY STAR qualifications. ENSC explained this was an isolated case due to a language barrier, and adjusted savings calculations accordingly. The energy-to-demand ratio for the program was calculated as 8.49 GWh/MW.
ied. For one particular case, the nonconformity could be explained through an on-site visit. It was due to a misunderstanding from the participant, because of a language barrier. ENSC had already addressed this issue and had not claimed th...
AI summary The text discusses a case where a misunderstanding due to a language barrier led to a nonconformity in an appliance replacement program. ENSC addressed the issue and proceeded with the rebate to satisfy the customer. Econoler agreed but recommended adding a field to validate the ENERGY STAR criterion. Additionally, Econoler suggests including a field for the annual energy use of new appliances to aid in evaluation.
rocess Evaluation Program Name: Appliance Replacement Program Telephone Interview with the Program Manager Date: List of questions (Q) and comments (C) discussed Source: Program Manual Page 24 Q: Are you tracking the participants who recei...
AI summary The document outlines a telephone interview with the Program Manager of the Appliance Replacement Program, discussing program implementation, participant tracking, delivery agents, partnership roles, barriers related to landlord-tenant relationships and upfront capital, and performance indicators. It also references an evaluation report and questions about energy consumption data.
2011 Evaluation Report Q4 – How would you qualify your participation process in this program? Simple or easy Complex Q4a - If you checked the Complex box, please elaborate. No comment / no opinion Q5- On a scale from 1 to 10 (where 1 is ve...
AI summary The document is a 2011 evaluation report for the Appliance Replacement Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes survey questions about participant satisfaction, program complexity, and suggestions for improvement, as well as inquiries about the number of parties involved in the program.
SIT PROTOCOL 1 GENERAL INFORMATION Date of visit: Order ID: Site contact name: Telephone: Address: 2 APPLIANCE INFORMATION Validate the database information with the site contact: Appliance Total Number of Units Replaced Date of Replacemen...
AI summary This document outlines a protocol for verifying appliance replacement information as part of an appliance replacement program administered by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. It includes fields for recording appliance details such as brand, model, energy consumption, and ENERGY STAR ratings.
2011 Evaluation Report Table 14: Customers’ Reasons for Purchasing CFLs (2008 to 2010)
AI summary The 2011 Evaluation Report includes Table 14, which outlines customers' reasons for purchasing Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) between 2008 and 2010.
Table 24: Likelihood of Purchasing CFLs in the Next Year (2008 to 2010) 2008 2009 2010 Non- Total Non- Total Non- Total Participants Participants (weighted) Participants Participants (weighted) Participants Participants (weighted) Sample 5...
AI summary Table 24 presents data on the likelihood of purchasing Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) from 2008 to 2010, showing trends in consumer behavior over time with weighted percentages and sample sizes for each year.
re were discounted bulbs, while the four non-participants who were dissatisfied mentioned that they did not like the light, that the light was beginning to dim or that the bulb was not bright enough. Table 27: Satisfaction with CFLs (2011)...
AI summary The text discusses customer satisfaction with Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFLs) in 2011, noting that 38% of participants and non-participants were very satisfied, while some non-participants expressed dissatisfaction with the light quality and brightness.
culate the total number of CFLs. if yes, go to MP2 series. MP2T. Record Number of CFL Bulbs— October 1st – day of interview 2011 Purchases by pack size October 1st -Day of interview 2011: MP2a. Number of single CFL bulb packs MP2b. Number...
AI summary The document provides a form to record the number of compact fluorescent light bulb (CFL) packs purchased by customers during a specific period. It includes fields for different pack sizes and instructs to calculate the total number of individual CFL bulbs from these purchases.
Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report MP4. [ASK IF AP1>0 OR AP2T>0] Now, I’d like you to think about the purchase of CFLs that your household could have made in May or June 2011. Between May 1st to June 30th, approximat...
AI summary The document presents a survey question related to the purchase of compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs) by households in May and June 2011, focusing on the number of bulbs purchased and how they were packaged.
Proportion 40.3% 15.7% 19.4% 24.6% Average Wattage 38.1 W 28 W 60 W 28 W Old Operating Time 9 h/day 14 h/day 6 h/day 11 h/day New Operating Time – with Timer 5 h/day 8 h/day 3 h/day 4 h/day Operating Season 12 months 12 months 8.5 months 8...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings from power bars with integrated timers installed through the MURR program, based on assumptions and on-site visits. It also mentions the MURR program's appliance retirement component, which targeted room air conditioners and dehumidifiers, and notes the installation rate and potential for product removal.
va Scotia Corporation 2011 Evaluation Report Dimmable CFLs Indicate the corresponding cooling system number for this section (Site validation/Contact declaration): Percent of the time when both lighting and heating are ON in this section (...
AI summary This document is a 2011 evaluation report for a facility that includes sections for validating the installation and status of dimmable and candelabra (chandelier) CFLs. It includes fields for logging installation dates, verifying lamp status, and noting any missing or burnt lamps.
2011 Evaluation Report New equipment installed Baseline equipment Number Wattage Number Wattage Additional Additional Type From Site From Site Type From Contact From Contact information information database validation database validation d...
AI summary The text presents a table comparing new equipment installed with baseline equipment, focusing on details such as type, number, wattage, and specific product features like hard-wiring with electronic ballasts and use for exit signs or retrofit kits.
120102012 DSM Evaluation Reports
125 passages
Table 3: 2012 On-Site Visits On-Site Visits Completed in 2012 Program Participant Sites Retailer Stores Recycler Appliance Retirement (ARet) 3 1 Instant Savings 20 Home Energy Assessment (HEA) 2 Fuel Substitution 8 Low Income Homeowner Ser...
AI summary Table 3 presents the number of on-site visits completed in 2012 across various energy efficiency and appliance retirement programs in Nova Scotia, including details on participant sites, retailer stores, and recyclers involved in these initiatives.
Table 15: Recommendations for Appliance Retirement No. Recommendations ARet-R3. Collect information on the manufacture year of refrigerators and freezers, as well as the capacity of room air conditioners: Where available, the Evaluator rec...
AI summary The document outlines recommendations for the Appliance Retirement program, focusing on collecting data such as the manufacture year of refrigerators and freezers, and the capacity of room air conditioners to improve the accuracy of unitary savings calculations.
APPENDIX I – BIBLIOGRAPHY Programs Bibliographic References Appliance Retirement (ARet) New York Department of Public Service, "Technical Resource Manual for Multifamily Replacement Refrigerators," September 29, 2010. Statistics Canada (CA...
AI summary The bibliography in Appendix I lists references for various energy efficiency programs, including appliance retirement initiatives and evaluations of energy-saving measures. It includes reports from organizations such as The Cadmus Group, Efficiency Vermont, and Econoler, and references standards and tools like the RETScreen simulation tool and the International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol.
Programs Bibliographic References Codes and Navigant Consulting, "Evaluation of Updating Regulations for Bulge Reflector Lamps and Elliptical Reflector Lamps," March 31, 2007. Standards (C&S) Navigant Consulting, "Market Analysis for Dry-t...
AI summary The document lists references to programs and standards related to energy efficiency, including evaluations and bulletins from the Office of Energy Efficiency and other consulting firms, focusing on regulations for lighting and transformers.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2012 process and impact evaluation of Appliance Retirement (ARet), which is a component of the Efficient Products program. The 2012 evaluation was based on in-depth interviews with...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2012 Appliance Retirement (ARet) program, a component of the Efficient Products program. The evaluation included interviews with the Program Manager and delivery agents, on-site visits, and a telephone survey of participants to assess the process and impact of the program.
PROGRAM COMPONENT OVERVIEW ARet began as a pilot in 2010 in the Halifax and Cape Breton Regional Municipalities. It was designed to encourage the retirement of old household appliances, such as refrigerators, freezers and room air conditio...
AI summary The Appliance Retirement (ARet) program, initiated in 2010, encourages Nova Scotians to retire old appliances by offering incentives and free pickup services. The program expanded to all of Nova Scotia in 2011 and later changed in 2012, including the exclusion of dehumidifiers and the reorganization of delivery agents. The program aimed to achieve net electricity savings of 5.4 GWh and demand savings of 0.8 MW in 2012.
KEY FINDINGS The 2012 evaluation of ARet demonstrated that the program is well designed and has an important level of participation. Indeed, the program achieved the retirement of 7,976 units for the year 2012. In terms of net energy savin...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program showed it was well designed and had significant participation, retiring 7,976 units. The program achieved 6.795 GWh in net energy savings in 2012, compared to 7.175 GWh in 2011 and 2.14 GWh in 2010.
Awareness To ensure program continuity in the years to come, program awareness constitutes an important aspect of the overall strategy. Similar to the survey results of 2011, this year's evaluation revealed that the main source of awarenes...
AI summary The evaluation highlights the effectiveness of ENSC's advertising in raising awareness of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program, with word of mouth also playing a key role. DAs expressed satisfaction with outreach efforts but suggested targeting rural areas and increasing retailer and municipality participation. Awareness of recycling services has improved, which is a key factor in customer participation.
Satisfaction Satisfaction with the program was very high among participants. Indeed, almost all participants (95%) expressed their satisfaction with the program. In particular, enrolling in the program was considered easy by nearly all par...
AI summary The program received high satisfaction ratings from participants, with 95% expressing satisfaction and 99% willing to recommend it. Participants found enrollment and scheduling easy, and program partners also reported satisfaction, though one Distributor Agent noted challenges working with AIR MILES due to timeline issues.
2.2.4 On-Site Visits In November 2012, three on-site visits were conducted at households that had retired an appliance through the ARet program. They were conducted by Econoler's subcontractor, Equilibrium Engineering. These visits were us...
AI summary In November 2012, three on-site visits were conducted at households that retired appliances through the ARet program, and one visit was conducted at a recycling facility to ensure proper recycling processes. The visits were carried out by Econoler's subcontractor, Equilibrium Engineering, and were used to gather data on appliance retirement and recycling procedures.
Table 3: Sample Size and Sampling Error 2011 2012 Population Sample Size (n) Sampling Error at 90% Confidence Level Population Sample Size (n) Sampling Error at 90% Confidence Level Refrigerators 4,022 45 +12.1% 2,630 80 +9.1% Freezers 2,5...
AI summary Table 3 presents sample sizes and sampling errors for various appliances across 2011 and 2012, with data showing the number of units sampled and the associated sampling error at a 90% confidence level for each year.
1 It is to be noted that categories of household appliances were not mutually exclusive. As a result, the total number of participants in the appliance groups was not equal to the total number of participants (both in terms of population a...
AI summary The text notes that categories of household appliances were not mutually exclusive, leading to discrepancies in the total number of participants in the appliance groups compared to the overall participant count in terms of population and sampling.
3.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE PROCESS EVALUATION In 2011, Econoler performed a comprehensive process evaluation of ARet. The 2010 evaluation report and recommendations, the program manual and website, the logic model and the program th...
AI summary This section outlines the 2012 process evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program, which builds on the 2011 evaluation. It includes follow-up on previous recommendations, updated documentation, program tracking sheets, and perspectives from partners and participants.
Table 4: Program Manual Content – ARet Program Manual Content 2011 2012 Document revisions Program description (including nature or type of program) Program justification Program objectives Incentives Eligibility criteria Program partners...
AI summary Table 4 outlines the content of the Program Manual for the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program, listing various sections such as program description, objectives, incentives, eligibility criteria, and evaluation plans. The table shows that some sections are not included in the manual, while others are partially included.
3.2.3 Evaluation Plan ENSC has adopted the Evaluator's recommended template for an evaluation plan, which is included as an Appendix of the ARet program manual. The PM provided positive feedback on this important tool that complements the...
AI summary ENSC has adopted an evaluation plan template to improve the ARet program. The plan includes feedback on the call centre's role, specifying appliance unit numbers, and defining program targets and realization rates over specific periods.
3.3 TRACKING SHEET Econoler reviewed the content of the ARet tracking sheet. It is to be noted that the tracking sheet reviewed by Econoler is an extract of the DA's online data management system. This specific form of the tracking sheet i...
AI summary Econoler reviewed the ARet tracking sheet, which is an extract from the DA's online data management system. The tracking sheet contains detailed information about participants and retired appliances, including contact details, appliance specifics, pickup dates, and data relevant for impact evaluation. It is noted that this form is not used by the PM for program monitoring.
3.5.2 Motivations and Barriers to Participation There were a number of reasons participants chose to retire their appliances through the program. Four in ten people (41%) indicated that the unit was not working well, while three in ten (31...
AI summary Participants in the appliance retirement program retired their appliances for various reasons, including the appliance not working well, rebate incentives, convenient pickup options, and a desire to reduce energy costs. Approximately 41% cited appliance malfunction, 31% were motivated by rebates, and 17% aimed to lower their energy costs.
Table 9: Why Participants Decided to Retire Their Appliances Through the Program 2011 2012 Reasons for Appliance Disposal Overall Overall (%) (%) Sample Size 90 201 Old unit was not working well 43% 41% Rebate/incentive 12% 31% They would...
AI summary Table 9 outlines the reasons participants retired their appliances through the program in 2011 and 2012, with the most common reason being that the old unit was not working well. Other factors included rebate incentives, convenience, and energy cost reduction.
Participants were asked if they know what happens to the appliance after it is picked up by the program. Two-thirds believed the appliance is recycled (65%), while one-quarter (24%) indicated that the hazardous material such as CFCs, refri...
AI summary Participants were asked about the fate of appliances after being picked up by the program. Most believed the appliances are recycled, while others thought hazardous materials are disposed of or the appliances are thrown out or sold for reuse.
Table 10: Appliance Disposal Beliefs Appliance Disposal Beliefs 2011 2012 Sample Size 90 201 Appliance is recycled 53% 65% Hazardous materials (CFCs, refrigerants, Freon) within appliance are disposed of 20% 24% Appliance is trashed 17% 13...
AI summary Table 10 presents data on appliance disposal beliefs in 2011 and 2012, showing increasing percentages of appliances being recycled and decreasing percentages being trashed. Very few participants (1%) expressed concerns about the rebate program, specifically fearing they would not qualify.
3.5.3 Old Appliances Refrigerators retired through the program were either primary or secondary refrigerators. That is, 53 percent of participants who retired a refrigerator noted that it was their primary refrigerator, while 48 percent re...
AI summary The program for retiring old appliances found that 53% of participants retired their primary refrigerator, while 48% retired a secondary or spare refrigerator.
Table 12: Use of Retired Refrigerators Use of Retired Refrigerators 2011 2012 Sample Size 45 80 Used as primary/main 42% 53% Used as secondary/spare 57% 48% Base: Respondents who retired a refrigerator Most of those who retired a secondary...
AI summary Table 12 presents data on the use of retired refrigerators, showing that a significant portion were used as primary or secondary appliances. Most secondary refrigerators remained plugged in, with some not in use, which is relevant for calculating the partial use factor in the Impact Evaluation.
As for the participants who retired a freezer through the program, the majority had the appliance plugged in all of the time (81%).
AI summary The majority of participants who retired a freezer through the program had the appliance plugged in all of the time (81%).
Most participants who retired an air conditioner through the program only ran the unit when necessary (78%).
AI summary Most participants in the appliance retirement program only used their retired air conditioners when necessary, with 78% of participants reporting this behavior.
Table 15: Condition of Appliances 2011 2012 Appliance Was Working Refrigerators (%) Freezers (%) Refrigerators (%) Freezers (%) Air Conditioners (%) Sample Size 45 40 80 81 40 Yes 87% 93% 88% 95% 88% Yes, but not that well 13% 8% 11% 2% 8%...
AI summary Table 15 presents data on the condition of appliances in 2011 and 2012, including refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners. It shows the percentage of appliances that were working, working but not well, not working, or refused by respondents, along with sample sizes for each year.
Table 17: Replacement Appliance – New or Used 2011 2012 Replacement Refrigerators (%) Freezers (%) Refrigerators (%) Freezers (%) Air Conditioners (#) Sample Size 24 22 60 54 15 New 67% 82% 77% 89% 14 Used 33% 18% 23% 11% 1 \ Base: Respond...
AI summary Table 17 presents data on appliance replacement, showing the percentage of refrigerators and freezers replaced with new or used units, as well as the number of air conditioners replaced, across the years 2011 and 2012.
3.5.5 Importance of Secondary Appliance Respondents who retired a secondary refrigerator or freezer through the program were asked how important it was to have a spare refrigerator or freezer for household food storage. The results exhibit...
AI summary Respondents who retired a secondary refrigerator or freezer through the program had differing views on the importance of having a spare appliance for food storage. A secondary refrigerator was seen as moderately important, while a freezer was considered very important. These findings, along with replacement rates, highlight the significance of secondary appliances to consumers and may explain their reluctance to discard functional appliances.
3.5.6 Appliances Remaining in Home Those who had a refrigerator retired through the program generally have just one refrigerator remaining (69%), while three in 10 (28%) have two refrigerators remaining. In terms of those who had a freezer...
AI summary The text discusses the number of appliances remaining in homes after retirement through a program. Most participants have one or two refrigerators, one freezer, or no air conditioners left. Refrigerators remaining are generally new, with most being less than five years old.
Table 20: Age of Remaining Refrigerators Age of 2011 2012 Remaining Refrigerators First Refrige rator (%) Second Refrige rator (#) Third Refrige rator (#) First Refrige rator (%) Second Refrige rator (%) Third Refrige rator (#) Sample size...
AI summary Table 20 presents data on the age distribution of remaining refrigerators in homes after an appliance retirement program. The data spans 2011 and 2012, showing percentages and counts of refrigerators in different age brackets, along with sample sizes and responses indicating refusal or lack of knowledge.
Table 21: Age of Remaining Freezers 2011 2012 Age of Remaining Freezers First Freezer (%) Second Freezer (#) Third Freezer (#) First Freezer (%) Second Freezer (#) Third Freezer (#) Sample Size 27 4 2 62 5 0 to 5 years old 81% 3 1 90% 1 6...
AI summary Table 21 provides data on the age distribution of remaining freezers in respondents' homes after a program. Most freezers are five years old or less, with the majority being under six years old. The data highlights the age distribution across different categories, with sample sizes and percentages provided for each age range.
Table 22: Age of Remaining Air Conditioners 2012 First Air Second Third Age of Remaining Air Conditioner Air Conditioner Air Conditioner Conditioners (#) (#) (#) Sample Size 19 2 1 0 to 5 years old 16 1 6 to 10 years old 2 1 1 11 to 15 yea...
AI summary Table 22 presents data on the age distribution of remaining air conditioners in homes after a program. The sample size is small, with 19 respondents having one air conditioner, 2 having two, and 1 having three. The majority (16) of air conditioners are 0 to 5 years old, followed by a few in the 6 to 10 years old range.
3.5.7 Program Influence Participants were asked to rate the importance of various factors in their decision to retire an appliance through the program on a scale of '1' to '10', where '10' is extremely important. The removal and recycling...
AI summary Participants rated the importance of factors influencing appliance retirement through a program. Removal and recycling services were most valued, followed by information/advice and monetary incentives. The Evaluator suggests that the rebate amount could be reconsidered in future evaluations.
Table 23: Importance of Program in Influencing Decision to Retire Appliances Importance of Brogram in 2012 Importance of Program in Influencing Decision to Retire Refri gerators Fre Freezers nditioners Appliances Sample Size Average Sample...
AI summary Table 23 presents data on the importance of various program factors in influencing appliance retirement decisions. Factors such as removal and recycling services, information provided, and financial incentives are evaluated across different appliance types, with scores ranging from 0 to 10.
The vast majority (93%) of participants did not experience any negative consequences as a result of having their appliance retired through the program. Of those that felt there were drawbacks, one percent mentioned the loss of food storage...
AI summary The appliance retirement program had minimal negative consequences, with 93% of participants not experiencing any drawbacks. Only 1% mentioned the loss of food storage space as a drawback.
4.1.1 On-Site Visit Sampling and Protocol Four on-site visits were conducted under the 2012 evaluation of ARet: one at the recycling facility and three at households that had retired old appliances in 2012. For the participating households...
AI summary The 2012 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program involved four on-site visits, including one at a recycling facility and three at households. Sampling was based on a tracking sheet with 4,500 participants who retired 5,119 appliances, mostly refrigerators. The selection aimed to cover various appliance types and quantities, with visits limited to the Halifax region.
Average Consumption of Retired Refrigerators Econoler revised the annual consumption of the refrigerators retired through the program using the data from the 2011 metering activity. In total, the annual energy consumption of 38 refrigerato...
AI summary Econoler updated the annual energy consumption of refrigerators retired through the program using data from the 2011 metering activity, testing 38 refrigerators. The analysis considered cubic foot size and age of the refrigerators retired in 2012 to estimate an average consumption.
Table 30: Average Metered Consumption Values for Retired Refrigerators Age of the Refrigerator Average Annual Consumption per Cubic Foot Proportion of Refrigerators in the 2012 Tracking Sheet 10 to 19 Years Old 58.9 kWh/cu. ft. 54% 20 to 2...
AI summary Table 30 presents average annual electricity consumption values for retired refrigerators categorized by age. The data shows increasing consumption with age, with an overall average of 67.9 kWh per cubic foot, calculated from weighted values based on the 2012 tracking sheet.
Table 31: Partial Use Factor for Retired Refrigerators 8 Refrigerator Category Primary Secondary All the Time 100% 54.1% Most of the Time - 13.5% Occasionally - 18.9% Never - 13.5% Partial Use Factor 1.00 0.71 \ Survey results presented in...
AI summary Table 31 presents the Partial Use Factor for retired refrigerators, categorizing usage into All the Time, Most of the Time, Occasionally, and Never, with corresponding percentages for Primary and Secondary factors. The table highlights how usage patterns affect energy efficiency calculations, with a note on rounding and decimal precision in evaluations.
Average Consumption of Retired Freezers To revise the annual consumption of the freezers retired through the program, Econoler used the data from the 2011 metering activity. In order to estimate an average consumption representative of the...
AI summary Econoler revised the annual consumption of retired freezers using 2011 metering data, analyzing energy consumption per cubic foot and manufacture year for 46 freezers to estimate an average representative of the program's retired freezers.
Table 33: Average Metered Consumption Values for Retired Freezers Age of the Freezer Average Annual Consumption per Cubic Foot Proportion of Freezers in the 2012 Tracking Sheet 10 to 19 Years Old 55.2 kWh/cu. ft. 39% 20 to 29 Years Old 84....
AI summary Table 33 presents average annual energy consumption values for retired freezers based on their age. The data shows that older freezers consume more energy, with the average consumption calculated as 73.4 kWh per cubic foot after weighting.
Table 34: Partial Use Factor for Retired Freezers 10 Freezer Category Secondary All the Time 81.3% Most of the Time 3.7% Occasionally 3.7% Never 11.3% Partial Use Factor 0.85 \ Survey results presented in the Process Evaluation section wer...
AI summary Table 34 presents the partial use factor for retired freezers, categorizing their usage frequency and providing a weighted percentage for each category. The partial use factor is calculated as 0.85, based on survey results and impact evaluations.
4.2.1 On-Site Visit Results The three on-site visits conducted at participating households during this evaluation demonstrated the smooth operation of the program. All the information on the retired appliances collected in the tracking she...
AI summary The on-site visits conducted at participating households confirmed the smooth operation of the program, with homeowners verifying the information on retired appliances. A visit to the recycling facility also validated the retirement and recycling processes of the appliances.
4.2.3 Revised Gross Savings Gross energy savings for the program were recalculated by the Evaluator to include the revised unitary savings values estimated for all types of appliances retired through the program. These adjusted unitary sav...
AI summary The Evaluator recalculated gross energy savings for the program by incorporating revised unitary savings values that consider appliance retirement proportions, occupant adjustment factors, and partial use factors. Demand savings were calculated using a 0.147 MW/GWh ratio, leading to total gross energy and demand savings of 7.354 GWh and 1.081 MW at the meter, and 8.089 GWh and 1.189 MW at the generator, using a line loss factor provided by Nova Scotia Power.
4.4.2 Internal Spillover The internal spillover effects were measured through the participant survey. For ARet, internal spillover can occur when participants decide to retire or replace other appliances on their own following their previo...
AI summary The internal spillover effects of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program were measured through a participant survey. Two participants reported retiring additional appliances after program participation, with the program's influence estimated at 100%. This resulted in an internal spillover level of 1%.
APPENDIX I - RECOMMENDATIONS Sections Recommendations 2. Explore the possibility of lowering the rebate: Participants' survey responses revealed that the money incentive is the third factor influencing the decision to retire an appliance t...
AI summary The appendix recommends exploring the possibility of lowering rebate amounts in the appliance retirement program, based on survey findings that suggest incentives are the third most important factor in appliance retirement, following removal and recycling services and information provided.
Q3. On a scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is very poor and 10 is excellent, please rate your satisfaction in regard to the: Aspects of the program Score 1 = very poor 10 = excellent NA = Not applicable Reason If you answered 8 or less, please s...
AI summary The document presents a survey with questions about satisfaction with various aspects of a program, including overall program satisfaction, marketing and outreach, and relationships with ENSC staff and the Call Centre. It also includes specific questions about the Appliance Retirement Program, modifications to the program, barriers to delivery, and complaints received.
APPENDIX III – ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOL 1 General Information Date of visit: ATONum: Participant name: Telephone: Address: Type of household: 2 Appliance information Validate tracking sheet information with participant: Appliance Number of U...
AI summary Appendix III outlines an on-site visit protocol, including general information and appliance details to be validated during visits. It includes fields for date, participant information, and tracking of retired appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners.
2.1 Refrigerators (if applicable) Replacement Information (Participant declaration and on-site observations) Number of primary refrigerators retired: Number replaced with a new refrigerator: - ENERGY STAR or not? - Smaller, Bigger or Same...
AI summary The document contains a table for reporting refrigerator replacement information, including the number of refrigerators retired, replaced with new or used units, and details such as ENERGY STAR compliance and size changes. It also includes a section for reporting secondary refrigerator usage patterns.
2.3 Room Air Conditionner Units (if applicable) Replacement Information (Participant declaration and on-site observations) Number of AC units retired: Number replaced with a new AC unit: - ENERGY STAR or not? - Smaller, Bigger or Same Size...
AI summary This section provides a template for recording information related to the replacement and usage of room air conditioners, including the number of units retired, replaced, and not replaced, along with details about their size and capacity. It also includes information on the frequency of use.
INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is _________ and I am with CRA (Corporate Research Associates), and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation. Our records indicate that you or...
AI summary CRA is conducting a survey to evaluate Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation's Appliance Retirement Program, seeking feedback from participants who had appliances removed and recycled in 2012. The survey aims to improve the program and will take approximately 15 minutes, with responses kept confidential.
Verification and Recall (V Series) V1. Our records indicate that your household participated in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program, which removed and recycled [INSERT NUMBER FROM VARIABLE "RF" IN THE SAMPLE] refrigerator...
AI summary This section of the document verifies participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program, asking respondents to confirm the number of appliances (refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners) removed and recycled from their homes in 2012, and provides clarification about the program's details, including rebates and Air Miles rewards.
Other Sources - 9. (Co-worker, family, or friend) - 10. (Other participants) - 11. (Internet—unspecified) - 96. (Other [SPECIFY__________________]) - 98. (Don't know) - 99. (Refused) P2. Why did you decide to get rid of the appliance(s) th...
AI summary The text presents a list of response categories for a survey question about reasons for retiring appliances through Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program. It includes options such as co-workers, family, friends, other participants, the internet, and unspecified responses.
Replacing unit 3. (Bought new appliance)
AI summary This section discusses the replacement of a unit with a new appliance, indicating a process related to appliance replacement or upgrade.
P3. Before participating, did you have any concerns about taking part in the program? 1. 2. 98. 99. (Yes) (No) (Don't know) (Refused) P4. [IF P3 = 1] What were those concerns? PROBE: Anything else? [DO NOT READ. ACCEPT ALL RESPONSES] 1. 2....
AI summary The text contains survey questions about participant concerns and perceptions regarding an appliance retirement program, including concerns about appliance removal and what happens to appliances after pickup. It also includes a probe about the recycling process.
Program Satisfaction [S Series] S1. Using a scale from 1 to 5 where 1 is "extremely dissatisfied" and 5 is "extremely satisfied" how would you rate your satisfaction with the program overall? [RECORD NUMBER, 98=Don't know, 99 Refused] [DO...
AI summary The text outlines a survey related to program satisfaction, specifically focusing on the Appliance Retirement Program. It includes questions on overall satisfaction, reasons for dissatisfaction, sign-up methods, and recommendations for improvement. The survey aims to gather feedback on program accessibility, eligibility, and customer experience.
[PROGRAMMER: EACH RESPONDENT WILL BE ASKED ABOUT ONE APPLIANCE]. APPLIANCE QUOTA REFRIGERATOR (RF) n=80 FREEZER (FZ) n=80 AIR CONDITIONNER (AC) n=40 TOTAL n=200
AI summary The document outlines a program where each respondent is asked about one appliance, with quotas specified for different types of appliances, including refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners, totaling 200 units.
Refrigerators [RF Series] [IF V1 = 1 and RF = 0 OR IF V3=0 GO TO FZ1 (FREEZERS)] [READ IF V1 = 1 AND RF = 1 OR IF V3=1], Now, I'd like you to think about the refrigerator you had removed through the program. [READ IF V1 = 1 AND RF > 1 OR I...
AI summary This section of the document contains survey questions related to refrigerators removed through a program, focusing on their usage, age, condition, and location. It includes branching logic and response options for data collection purposes.
Response 98. (Don't know) 99. (Refused) RFR6. Next, I'm going to ask you to rate the importance of the Appliance Retirement Program as well as other factors that might have influenced your decision to remove your refrigerator. Using a scal...
AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents to rate the importance of various factors influencing their decision to remove a refrigerator, including incentives, information, and free removal services. It also asks how likely they would have participated in the Appliance Retirement Program without the financial incentive.
Replacement Refrigerator (RE Series) - RE1. Did you replace the refrigerator that you turned in through Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program? - 1. Yes - 2. No [GO TO RRF1] - 98. (Don't know) [GO TO RRF1] - 99. (Refused) [G...
AI summary This section of the document asks respondents whether they replaced a refrigerator through Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program and whether the replacement refrigerator was new or used.
Freezer Free-Ridership [FFR Series] Please continue thinking about just that one freezer. - FFR1. Had you already considered disposing of the freezer before you heard about Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program? By dispose...
AI summary This section of the Freezer Free-Ridership [FFR Series] asks respondents about their prior intentions to dispose of a freezer before learning about the Appliance Retirement Program, what they would have done without the program, and how likely they would have paid for recycling services. It also asks about the importance of the program and other factors in their decision to remove the freezer.
Factor (READ AND RANDOMIZE) Responses a. The $35 incentive provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused b. Information or advice received from the program Response 98 Don't Know 99 Refused c. Removal and recycling s...
AI summary The text presents a survey question asking respondents how likely they would have disposed of a freezer through the Appliance Retirement Program if only free removal and recycling services were provided, without the $35 incentive. It focuses on program participation and the impact of financial incentives.
Replacement Freezer Questions (FE Series) - FE1. Did you get another freezer to replace the one you turned in through Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program? - 1. Yes - 2. No [GO TO RFZ1] - 98. (Don't know) [GO TO RFZ1] - 99...
AI summary The document presents a series of questions related to the replacement of freezers under Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program. It asks whether a freezer was received as a replacement and whether the replacement was new or used.
Replacement Air Conditioner Unit Questions (ACU Series) - ACU1. Did you get another air conditioner unit to replace the one you turned in through Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program? - 1. Yes - 2. No [GO TO ACZ1] - 98. (D...
AI summary The document contains questions about whether respondents received a replacement air conditioner unit through Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program and whether the replacement unit was new or used.
Spillover [SO Series] - SO1. Since participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program, have you disposed of other appliances WITHOUT RECEIVING A REBATE? - 1. Yes - 2. No - 98. (Don't know) - 99. (Refused)
AI summary This question asks participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program if they have disposed of other appliances without receiving a rebate, with response options including yes, no, don't know, or refused.
[GO TO IM1 IF SO1=2 OR 98 OR 99] - SO2. What other appliance(s) have you disposed of WITHOUT RECEIVING A REBATE since participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance retirement program? [READ IN ORDER – CODE ONE ONLY PER STATEMENT] - a...
AI summary This section of the regulatory proceeding document asks respondents to indicate if they have disposed of any other appliances without receiving a rebate since participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement program. The options include refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners, with responses coded as yes, no, don't know, or refused.
[GO TO IM1 IF 2 OR 98 OR 99 TO ALL OF SO2a - d] - SO3. How did you dispose of [this/these] appliance(s)? Did you… [READ, CHECK ALL THAT APPLY] - 1. Sell it/ them - 2. Give it/them away for free - 3. Take it/them to a recycling center or hi...
AI summary The text presents survey questions related to appliance disposal methods and the influence of the Appliance Retirement Program on disposal decisions without receiving a rebate. It includes multiple response options and a rating scale for assessing program influence.
Impact of Measures [IM Series] - IM1. Please indicate how each of the following has changed since participating in the Appliance Retirement Program? On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 means "no improvement" and 5 means a "considerable improveme...
AI summary The document outlines a survey (Impact of Measures [IM Series]) assessing the effects of the Appliance Retirement Program. It asks participants about improvements in energy costs, knowledge, and interest in energy efficiency, as well as any negative consequences experienced from the program and whether they would recommend it to others.
PA2 Score: FR4. [Ask if FR3 = 10] How soon would you have disposed of your old appliance? - 1. Within a year of when the program took it - 2. More than a year later - 99. (Don't Know / Refused) (10 - FR6 P) x 10% IF 1. : FR4 = EMPTY IF 2....
AI summary The text presents a survey question (FR4) asking respondents how soon they would have disposed of their old appliance, with options for within a year or more than a year later. It also includes a calculation formula involving FR3 and FR6, suggesting it is part of a scoring or evaluation process.
SECTION W – CEE TIER III CLOTHES WASHERS W1. I now have a few questions about your sales of CEE Tier III clothes washers. We would like to know your approximate sales volume for CEE Tier III clothes washers for the spring and fall 2012 cam...
AI summary The section asks about the sales volume of CEE Tier III clothes washers during the spring and fall 2012 campaigns, including estimates of sales trends and the impact of the Instant Savings rebate program on sales.
APPENDIX IV – ON-SITE VISIT PROTOCOL 1 Visit Report Store Name: Address: Date of Visit: Eligible Products Energy Star Regular CFLs (multipacks of 2 or more) Energy Star Specialty CFLs (single or double packs) Energy Star Specialty CFLs (mu...
AI summary Appendix IV outlines an on-site visit protocol, including a table listing eligible products for inspection, such as Energy Star certified light bulbs, thermostats, and appliances. The document includes a placeholder for a store name, address, and visit date.
PR2. What are those products? Any others? [DO NOT READ RESPONSES – CODE AS MANY AS APPLY] - 1. (Regular or specialty CFLs)
AI summary The document asks about the types of products, specifically regular or specialty compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs), and whether there are any others. It instructs not to read responses and to code as many as applicable.
ACRONYMS ARep Appliance Replacement ARet Appliance Retirement CFL Compact Fluorescent Lamp DA Delivery Agent DCS Department of Community Services EA Energy Advisor EEH EnerGuide for Existing Houses ENSC Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation H...
AI summary The text provides a list of acronyms and their corresponding full forms, including terms related to energy efficiency, appliance programs, and government departments. It includes references to organizations, programs, and regulatory bodies involved in energy and utility management.
2.1 OBJECTIVE AND APPROACH OF THE IMPACT EVALUATION The purpose of the evaluation is to quantify, in terms of energy and demand savings, the impact of the introduction of eight new C&S in the Nova Scotia market in 2012. To achieve this, th...
AI summary The impact evaluation aims to quantify energy and demand savings from eight new C&S introduced in Nova Scotia in 2012. It focuses on market size, the portion of the market affected by C&S, and unitary savings values.
Table 5: Electric Motors – Minimum Nominal Efficiency Standard (Premium) 22 Energy Efficiency Standard (Percentage) Item Power in HP Power in kW Open Enclosed 2 Pole 4 Pole 6 Pole 2 Pole 4 Pole 6 Pole 1. 1 0.75 77.0 85.5 82.5 77.0 85.5 82....
AI summary Table 5 outlines the minimum nominal efficiency standards for electric motors, categorized by horsepower and kilowatt ratings, with separate standards for open and enclosed motors. The data reflects efficiency percentages for different pole configurations.
3.1.3 Products Covered by the Introduction of the New Standard The new regulations require the majority of electric motors that were already regulated (2-, 4- and 6 pole motors sized 1 to 200 HP) to meet or exceed higher MEPS (premium effi...
AI summary The new regulations expand efficiency requirements to include more electric motors, requiring previously regulated motors to meet higher MEPS standards and newly covered motors to meet the efficiency levels of former regulations, affecting most three-phase electric motors of 1 to 500 HP.
Product Class Shipments to Canada in 2012 Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Three-phase electric motors sized 1 to 5 HP 50,526 shipments 1,389 shipments Three-phase electric motors sized 6 to 25 HP 43,850 shipments 1,206 shipments Three-pha...
AI summary The table presents shipments of three-phase electric motors of various sizes to Canada and Nova Scotia in 2012. The data highlights the distribution of motor shipments across different horsepower ranges, with the majority of shipments directed to Canada rather than Nova Scotia.
24 Office of Energy Efficiency, Electric Motors – Updated Bulletin on Amending the Standards - June 2010 (as pre-published) , http://oee.nrcan.gc.ca/regulations/bulletins/17333, January 20, 2011. Statistics Canada's Canadian International...
AI summary This text references a bulletin from the Office of Energy Efficiency regarding updated standards for electric motors and mentions Statistics Canada's data on electric motor imports and exports. It notes that data for three-phase electric motors is not available and provides an estimated market size for 2012.
Product Class Canada: Importations – (Re exportations + Exportations) in 2012 Nova Scotia: Importations - Exportations in 2012 Electric motors sized 1 to 100 312,965 152 HP shipments shipments Electric motors sized 101 to 500 3,839 0 HP sh...
AI summary The document presents importation and exportation data for electric motors in Canada and Nova Scotia in 2012. It discusses discrepancies in data and the challenges in obtaining accurate market size and non-compliance rate information from manufacturers and distributors, with initial estimates from the Nielsen Engineering report being accepted by most interviewees.
3.1.5 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Standard In the report prepared by Nielsen Engineering, the ratio of NEMA Premium efficiency motors sales is provided for 2003 to 2007. This data comes from both a survey of motor manufacturers,...
AI summary The text discusses the impact of efficiency standards on the electric motor market in Canada, referencing data from Nielsen Engineering on NEMA Premium efficiency motor sales from 2003 to 2007. It highlights the challenges in estimating non-compliant motor ratios, especially for motors sized 201 to 500 HP due to less stringent MEPS standards and the lack of provincial data.
Product Class Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2012 Three-phase electric motors sized 1 to 5 HP 71.2% Three-phase electric motors sized 6 to 25 HP 56.1% Three-phase electric motors sized 26 to 100 HP...
AI summary The document presents data on the percentage of shipments of three-phase electric motors to Nova Scotia affected by energy efficiency standards in 2012. Participants struggled to estimate market impact, but Nielsen Engineering's non-compliance rates were accepted by Econoler due to the larger survey size.
Table 11: Energy Savings from the Introduction of the Electric Motors Standard in the Nova Scotian Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2012 Annual E...
AI summary Table 11 presents energy savings from the introduction of electric motors standards in Nova Scotia. It details shipments, percentage affected by the standard, and annual energy savings for different motor sizes. Total energy savings at the meter for 2012 are reported as 1.146 GWh.
Table 12: Demand Savings from the Introduction of the Electric Motors Standard in the Nova Scotian Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2012 Peak Dem...
AI summary Table 12 presents demand savings from the introduction of the Electric Motors Standard in the Nova Scotian market, detailing shipments, percentage of shipments affected by the standard, peak demand savings, diversity factor, and total demand savings for various motor sizes.
Table 13: Former Minimum Efficacy Levels for PAR, R, BR Lamps and ER Lamps 32 Rated Wattage (W) Minimum Average Efficacy (lm/W) 40–50 10.5 51–59 11.0 60–85 12.5 86–115 14.0 116–155 14.5 156–205 15.0 Table 14: Former Minimum Efficacy Levels...
AI summary The text provides tables showing former minimum efficacy levels for various types of lamps, including PAR, R, BR, and ER lamps, with specific wattage ranges and corresponding minimum average efficacy in lumens per watt.
New Regulations With Amendment 11, NRCan has applied the current MEPS for PAR, R and BR lamps (see [Table 15)](#page-87-0) to all regulated general service incandescent reflector lamps, with the exception of certain ER lamps (ER30 and ER40...
AI summary Amendment 11 applies current MEPS for PAR, R, and BR lamps to general service incandescent reflector lamps, excluding certain ER lamps. Additional exemptions include specific R, BR, silver bowl, and heat-sensitive lamps. Exempted lamps must still meet pre-amendment efficiency levels.
3.2.3 Products Covered by the Introduction of the New Standard The following types of lamps were previously not required to meet current MEPS for PAR, R and BR lamps but are required to do so from now on: - > BR18 to BR30 lamps of 65 watts...
AI summary The new standard now requires certain types of BR, ER, and PAR lamps to meet MEPS, with specific exceptions for lower wattage models. This update affects lamps such as BR18 to BR30, BR38 to BR40, and ER lamps.
39 Navigant Consulting, Evaluation of Updating Regulations for Bulge Reflector Lamps and Elliptical Reflector Lamps, March 31, 2007, pp. 22-24. Interviews were conducted with 2 manufacturers and 4 distributors. During the interviews, most...
AI summary The document references a study by Navigant Consulting on updating regulations for Bulge Reflector (BR) and Elliptical Reflector (ER) lamps, noting that certain lamp categories have very low sales in Nova Scotia and were excluded from the analysis. Interviews with manufacturers and distributors supported initial market size estimates.
In its report, Navigant Consulting does not provide data regarding the percentage of shipments that would be affected by Amendment 11 (i.e. ratio of non-compliant lamps shipments). Therefore, only an average of the data collected from the...
AI summary Navigant Consulting's report does not provide data on the percentage of shipments affected by Amendment 11. Instead, an average of interview data is used to estimate the market impact of the standard.
Product Class Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2012 60–85 W BR – residential 82.5% 86–155 W BR – residential 81.3% 60–85 W BR – commercial 77.0% 86–155 W BR – commercial 77.0% 75 W ER30 – commercial...
AI summary The table presents data on the percentage of total shipments to Nova Scotia affected by energy efficiency standards in 2012, categorized by product class and wattage. The data shows that a significant portion of shipments were impacted by these standards, particularly in the residential and commercial sectors.
Table 21: Energy Savings from the Introduction of the General Service Incandescent Reflector Lamps Standard in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by t...
AI summary Table 21 presents energy savings from the introduction of the General Service Incandescent Reflector Lamps Standard in Nova Scotia. The table shows the number of shipments, percentage affected by the standard, annual energy savings per unit, and total energy savings at the meter for 2012 across different product classes and sectors.
Table 22: Demand Savings from the Introduction of the General Service Incandescent Reflector Lamps Standard in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by t...
AI summary Table 22 outlines the demand savings achieved in Nova Scotia from the introduction of the General Service Incandescent Reflector Lamps Standard in 2012, including data on shipments, percentage of shipments affected, annual demand savings, diversity factor, and total demand savings at the meter for various product classes.
3.3.1 Product Description The definition for dry-type transformers was amended in the last revision of the regulations. 41 Since April 12, 2012, a dry-type transformer, according to the new standard, is defined as: A transformer in which t...
AI summary The definition of dry-type transformers was updated in the regulations, specifying criteria such as power ratings, frequency, and voltage limits for both single-phase and three-phase transformers.
Previous Regulations The first regulation of dry-type transformers was introduced on April 23, 2003 with an effective date of January 1, 2005. After being made aware by manufacturers of the presence of some loopholes in the Regulations tha...
AI summary This section discusses the history and amendments to regulations on dry-type transformers, including the introduction of MEPS in 2003, amendments in 2006 to address loopholes, and changes to BIL groupings. It also outlines the coverage of transformers before Amendment 11.
New Regulation Amendment 11 introduces more stringent minimum efficiency levels solely for dry-type transformers with a BIL greater than 1.2kV. Those with a BIL of 1.2 kV are required to meet the same MEPS as before (see [Table 24)](#page-...
AI summary Amendment 11 introduces stricter minimum efficiency standards for dry-type transformers with a BIL greater than 1.2kV, aligning Canadian regulations with U.S. DOE standards from 2010. The amendment also updates the classification of transformers to include efficiency levels for products previously unregulated in the U.S.
3.3.3 Products Covered by the Introduction of the New Standard Only dry-type transformers with a BIL greater than 1.2 kV are targeted by the new, more stringent MEPS. Dry-type transformers of 1.2 kV are not affected by this revision and ar...
AI summary The new MEPS applies only to dry-type transformers with a BIL greater than 1.2 kV. Transformers with a BIL of 1.2 kV are not affected and must still meet the same efficiency levels.
Previous Regulations In November 2006, an amendment to the Regulations introduced minimum efficiency levels for the self-contained commercial refrigeration market for the first time. 57 From April to December 2007, products whose manufactu...
AI summary In 2006, regulations introduced minimum efficiency levels for self-contained commercial refrigeration products. These levels were updated in 2007 and 2008, with more stringent requirements implemented in 2008. The products covered are the same as those under Amendment 11.
Table 27: Former Minimum Efficacy Levels for Self-contained Refrigerators and Freezers 59 Product Maximum E daily (kWh/day) Door or Drawer Type April 1, 2007 - December 31, 2007 on or after January 1, 2008 Opaque doors or drawers 0.00441 V...
AI summary Table 27 outlines former minimum efficacy levels for self-contained refrigerators and freezers, detailing maximum energy consumption (in kWh/day) based on product type and door/drawer characteristics, with different standards applying before and after January 1, 2008.
Table 28: Current Minimum Efficacy Levels for Self-contained Refrigerators and Freezers 62 Product Door or Drawer Type Maximum Daily Energy Consumption Solid 0.00353V + 2.04 Refrigerators Transparent not designed for pull-down temperature...
AI summary Table 28 outlines the current minimum efficacy levels for self-contained refrigerators and freezers, specifying maximum daily energy consumption based on product type and volume. These standards are set to ensure energy efficiency in appliances.
3.4.3 Products Covered by the Introduction of the New Standard The new standard for self-contained commercial refrigerators and freezers does not widen the scope of previous regulations; it actually increases the stringency of former MEPS....
AI summary The new standard for self-contained commercial refrigerators and freezers increases the stringency of previous MEPS regulations, requiring these products to meet stricter efficiency levels. The standard applies to specific types of refrigeration units used for food and merchandise storage.
Table 29: Estimated 2012 Market Size of Self-contained Commercial Ice Cream-type Freezers in Canada and in Nova Scotia 66 Product Class Shipments to Canada in 2012 Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Opaque ice cream-type freezers 72 shipment...
AI summary The document presents Table 29, which estimates the 2012 market size of self-contained commercial ice cream-type freezers in Canada and Nova Scotia. Due to the lack of import/export data from Statistics Canada, manufacturers and distributors were interviewed to provide shipment numbers and market share estimates for these products.
3.5.1 Product Description The products that are subject to the current regulations are factory-assembled unitary air conditioners and heat pumps ranging in capacity from 19 kilowatts (kW) (65,000 Btu/h) to 223 kW (760,000 Btu/h), and facto...
AI summary The current regulations apply to factory-assembled unitary air conditioners and heat pumps with capacities ranging from 19 kW to 223 kW, as well as large air-conditioning condensing units with capacities between 19 kW and 70 kW. Single package vertical air conditioners are excluded and covered in a separate section.
Table 30: Former Minimum Efficiency Levels for Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps 69 Product Class (ARI type classification) Product Description Cooling Capacity Range – kW (1000Btu/h) Cooling Minimum Efficiency – Electric or No Heating...
AI summary Table 30 outlines former minimum efficiency levels for large air conditioners and heat pumps, including cooling and heating efficiency metrics for different product classes and capacity ranges. The data is sourced from a 2005 bulletin by the Office of Energy Efficiency.
With Amendment 11, NRCan opted for more stringent MEPS for already covered large air conditioners and heat pumps (cooling capacities between 65,000 Btu/h and 240,000 Btu/h).71 However, "minimum efficiency levels for large condensing units...
AI summary Amendment 11 to the regulations introduced more stringent MEPS for large air conditioners and heat pumps with cooling capacities between 65,000 Btu/h and 240,000 Btu/h, while minimum efficiency levels for large condensing units remained unchanged. The regulations were also extended to cover larger equipment with cooling capacities up to 223 kW. These changes align with ASHRAE 90.1-2007 standards.
Table 32: Minimum Efficiency Levels for Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps 75 Product Class HRAI Type Classification Product Description Cooling Capacity Range kW (1000 Btu/h) Cooling Min. Effic. – Electric or No Heating Section EER and...
AI summary Table 32 outlines the minimum efficiency levels for large air conditioners and heat pumps, specifying cooling and heating performance metrics across different product classes and capacity ranges. The table includes efficiency standards such as EER (Energy Efficiency Ratio) and COP (Coefficient of Performance) for various classifications.
3.5.3 Products Covered by the Introduction of the New Standard With Amendment 11 , large air conditioners and heat pumps ranging in capacity from 19 kW (65,000 Btu/h) to 70 kW (240,000 Btu/h) are now required to meet stricter efficiency le...
AI summary Amendment 11 introduces stricter efficiency requirements for large air conditioners and heat pumps with capacities between 19 kW and 223 kW, while air-conditioning condensing units remain unaffected by the new standard.
Table 35: Portion of the Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Market Impacted by the Standard Product Class Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2012 Medium air conditioners (≥ 19.0 kW and < 39.6 kW (≥...
AI summary Table 35 outlines the percentage of large air conditioners and heat pumps shipped to Nova Scotia that are impacted by energy efficiency standards in 2012. All product classes listed have 90% of their shipments affected by the standard.
Table 38: Demand Savings from the Introduction of the Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Standard in the Nova Scotian Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Sta...
AI summary Table 38 outlines demand savings from the introduction of the Large Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps Standard in Nova Scotia. The table details shipments, percentage of shipments affected by the standard, annual demand savings, diversity factor, and total demand savings at the meter for various product classes in 2012.
3.6.1 Product Description As defined by NRCan, single package vertical air conditioners (SPVAC) and SPVHP are "air-cooled single packaged equipment with components arranged vertically [...] This equipment can be mounted on the exterior or...
AI summary The document defines single package vertical air conditioners (SPVAC) and SPVHP as air-cooled, vertically arranged equipment, often used in schools and modular buildings. These units may be powered by single-phase or three-phase electricity and are not necessarily equipped with fossil-fired heating.
Table 39: Minimum Efficiency Levels for Single Package Vertical Air Conditioners and Heat Pumps (SPVAC and SPVHP) 91 Туре Mode Size Minimum Efficiency Requirement SPVAC and SPVHP Cooling < 65,000 Btu/h EER = 9.0 ≥ 65,000 Btu/h to < 135,000...
AI summary Table 39 outlines the minimum efficiency levels for single package vertical air conditioners and heat pumps based on size and mode of operation, including specific EER and COP values for different capacity ranges.
Product Type Off Mode Limit Standby Mode Limit Compact audio products 1 W 3 W Televisions 1 W 4 W Video products 1 W 3 W Table 42 shows the more stringent MEPS that will be "applied to products manufactured as of January 1. 2013."104 This...
AI summary Table 42 outlines Tier 2 Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) for standby and off mode power limits, effective January 1, 2011. These standards apply to various product types, including compact audio products, televisions, and video products. The table also notes that more stringent MEPS will be applied to products manufactured as of January 1, 2013, but for the study period, only Tier 1 MEPS will be required.
3.7.3 Products Covered by the Introduction of the New Standard Compact audio products, televisions and video products using off mode and/or standby power are covered by this new standard (see Section 3.7.1 Product Description ). 107
AI summary This section outlines the products affected by the new standard, including compact audio products, televisions, and video products that use off mode and/or standby power, referencing Section 3.7.1 for further details.
Product Class Shipments to Canada in 2012 Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Integrated stereo 357,905 shipments 9,842 shipments Portable audio 596,992 shipments 16,417 shipments Televisions 3,527,905 shipments 97,017 shipments Non-recording...
AI summary The document presents shipment data for various electronic products to Canada and Nova Scotia in 2012. Due to the lack of similar data in Statistics Canada's database, sales figures from Ecos' report were extrapolated and used during interviews.
3.7.5 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Standard Non-compliance rate for standby power products was also provided by Ecos, but only for 2007. In the absence of more recent data, that information was assumed to still be valid for the im...
AI summary The non-compliance rate for standby power products in Nova Scotia was estimated using data from 2007, assuming it remained valid for 2012 and that Nova Scotia's rate matched Canada's due to lack of provincial statistics. Table 44 provides an estimate of the market portion impacted by the standard.
Product Class Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2012 Integrated stereo 51% Portable audio 5% Televisions 7% Non-recording video players 17% Recording video players 48% Because of the inability of inte...
AI summary The table shows the percentage of total shipments to Nova Scotia affected by appliance efficiency standards in 2012, with integrated stereos and recording video players having the highest impact. No changes were made to the estimate due to the inability of interviewees to comment on non-compliance rates.
The Evaluator estimates that the introduction of new MEPS for standby power products resulted in a total saving of 2.961 GWh in Nova Scotia in 2012.
AI summary The Evaluator estimates that the introduction of new MEPS for standby power products resulted in a total saving of 2.961 GWh in Nova Scotia in 2012.
Table 46: Energy Savings from the Introduction of the Standby Power Products Standard in the Nova Scotian Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2012 A...
AI summary Table 46 presents energy savings from the introduction of the Standby Power Products Standard in Nova Scotia, showing the number of shipments, percentage affected by the standard, and annual energy savings for various product classes in 2012. Total energy savings at the meter for 2012 amounted to 2.961 GWh.
Table 51: Energy Savings from the Introduction of the External Power Supplies Standard in the Nova Scotian Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2012 Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2012...
AI summary Table 51 presents energy savings data from the introduction of the External Power Supplies Standard in the Nova Scotian market in 2012. It shows the number of shipments, the percentage affected by the standard, and the annual and total energy savings for different product classes.
BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES Canadian Standards Association, Minimum efficiency for dry-type transformers , http://www.hammondpowersolutions.com/upload_files/csa_c802%202-2006.pdf, January 23, 2007, p. 6. Caneta Research, Commercial Refrigera...
AI summary The bibliography and references section lists various documents and studies related to energy efficiency, appliance standards, and transformer regulations. These include reports from organizations such as Caneta Research, Ecos, Navigant Consulting, and the Office of Energy Efficiency, covering topics like standby power use, market analysis, and regulatory amendments.
[Note: If the term "shipment" isn't understood, use the expression "units sold"] According to our research, there would be approximately […] in 2012. Products Number of Shipments to Canada Number of Shipments to Nova Scotia Electric motors...
AI summary The text presents data on the number of electric motor shipments to Canada and Nova Scotia in 2012, categorized by horsepower ranges. The table includes total shipments for motors ranging from 1 to 500 HP.
PROBE: The Office of Energy Efficiency has estimated that […] would be impacted for the whole Canadian market. Do those proportions seem appropriate to you? Provide an explanation. Products Proportion Impacted by the New Standard Electric...
AI summary The Office of Energy Efficiency has estimated that a significant proportion of electric motors in Canada would be impacted by new energy efficiency standards. The percentages range from 47.5% to 77.1% across different motor sizes, with the total for motors up to 500 HP being 60.7%. The question raised is whether these proportions are appropriate.
3. What percentage of total shipments of commercial refrigerators and freezers to Canada do you think the sales of these products represent? Products Percentage of Total Commercial Refrigerator and Freezer shipments Opaque self-contained r...
AI summary The document asks for the percentage of total shipments of commercial refrigerators and freezers to Canada that are sold in Nova Scotia, as well as the proportion of these products impacted by new minimum energy efficiency standards in 2012. It also references an estimate from the Office of Energy Efficiency regarding the impact of these standards on the Canadian market.
INTRODUCTION (2 minutes) - Thank the interviewee - The interviewer introduces himself/herself - The interviewer introduces the ENSC study Goal: The objective consists in quantifying, in terms of savings, the impact of the introduction of 9...
AI summary The interview aims to validate estimations of market size for large air conditioners and heat pumps in Nova Scotia following the introduction of 9 new energy efficiency standards. The focus is on quantifying the impact of these standards in terms of energy savings.
[NOTE: EVEN IF THE PARTICIPANT CAN'T PROVIDE QUANTITATIVE DATA, MAKE SURE TO COLLECT ALL RELEVANT QUALITATIVE INFORMATION] 1. To your knowledge, since 2006, have shipments of large air conditioners and heat pumps and single package vertica...
AI summary The text asks whether shipments of large air conditioners, heat pumps, and single package vertical air conditioners to Canada have increased, decreased, or remained the same since 2006, and to what extent, emphasizing the collection of qualitative data even without quantitative figures.
Products Percentage of All Canadian Shipments Being Shipped to Nova Scotia (2012) Medium air conditioners (between 19.0 kW and 39.6 kW (between 65 kBtu/h and 135 kBtu/h)) % Large air conditioners (between 39.6 kW and 70.3 kW (between 135 k...
AI summary The document presents a table listing various air conditioning and heat pump products along with their respective capacities and the percentage of Canadian shipments sent to Nova Scotia in 2012. However, the specific percentages are not provided in the text.
4. To your knowledge, in 2012, approximately which proportion of large air conditioners and heat pumps and single package vertical air conditioners and heat pumps shipped to Nova Scotia was impacted by the new minimum energy efficiency sta...
AI summary The question asks for the proportion of large air conditioners, heat pumps, and single package vertical air conditioners and heat pumps shipped to Nova Scotia in 2012 that were impacted by new minimum energy efficiency standards.
Products Proportion Impacted by the New Standard Medium air conditioners (between 19.0 kW and 39.6 kW (between 65 kBtu/h and 135 kBtu/h)) % Large air conditioners (between 39.6 kW and 70.3 kW (between 135 kBtu/h and 240 kBtu/h)) % Very lar...
AI summary The document presents a table showing the proportion of various air conditioning and heat pump products impacted by new energy efficiency standards. It asks for feedback on whether the estimated proportions seem appropriate and inquires about the sources of market data used for air conditioners and heat pumps.