Topic:"Appliance Standards" in M09096

Appliance Replacements Appliance Retirement will place an increased focus on appliance replacements by offering a new turn-key service. Currently, Appliance Retirement replaces fridges, freezers and dehumidifiers for low-income qualified N...

AI summary Appliance Retirement expands focus to appliance replacements, including new services for low-income Nova Scotians via HomeWarming and First Nations programs. ENS introduces a cost-based appliance replacement package under the Preferred Plan, offering full-service removal, recycling, and installation of efficient appliances.

Marketing Strategy The marketing strategy for Appliance Retirement will focus on enhancing a customer's quality of life through non-energy benefits (convenient, hassle-free pick up and recycling) with the rebate promoted as a secondary mes...

AI summary The marketing strategy for Appliance Retirement emphasizes non-energy benefits (convenience, recycling) with rebates as a secondary message, using digital, social media, and out-of-home campaigns. Instant Savings aims to boost energy-efficient product purchases via in-store promotions, media, and cross-program outreach. Both strategies target increased participation across Nova Scotia.

6.3.2 Codes & Standards In 2020-2022, EfficiencyOne will continue to work with government colleagues to promote and advance the development of evidence-based and meaningful changes to energy efficiency related codes and standards in collab...

AI summary EfficiencyOne plans to collaborate with provincial and federal governments, stakeholders, and the Canadian Standards Association to advance energy efficiency codes and standards. They will support strategic electrification, demand response, and DSM through technical and policy assistance, while participating in relevant committees and task forces.

12 Q: Can you discuss whether the lighting transition is dependent on changes in standards? A: The potential for changing standards is a clear indicator of the increasing prevalence of efficient lighting. However, just as this testimony is...

AI summary The lighting transition is influenced by regulatory standards, but the DOE's decision not to implement a 2017 standard (which would have required LED performance criteria) may hinder progress. This highlights the dependency of lighting transitions on evolving standards.

ll%20EE%20Savings%20Come%20From%20Next_508.pdf) 2 Figure 26. Potential distribution of net cumulative residential savings for cool climates in United 3 States. 4 Smart building controls also offer the potential for increased savings from H...

AI summary The text discusses the potential of smart building technologies to increase energy savings in residential and commercial settings, citing a study showing 18-33% savings in offices. It highlights the 'midstream' program approach for non-lighting technologies, which could boost net savings by 20% by 2028, as supported by ENERGY STAR analysis.

Description An ENERGY STAR Integrated Screw Based SSL (LED) Lamp (specification effective August 2010) is purchased in place of an incandescent lamp. This measure is broken down in to Omnidirectional (e.g. A-Type lamps), Decorative (e.g. G...

AI summary The document describes replacing incandescent lamps with ENERGY STAR-certified LED lamps, categorized by type (Omnidirectional, Decorative, Directional) and wattage ranges. The specification details are linked to an ENERGY STAR resource.

since the program, pilot and barriers analysis determined that biggest barrier to appliance retirement was lack of convenience. Appliance Residential Retirement The program ended in 2015 due to successful removal of the majority of old, pr...

AI summary The appliance retirement program, which ended in 2015, aimed to remove inefficient pre-1994 appliances. The main barrier was lack of convenience. The program offered rebates for high-efficiency heating and cooling equipment through HVAC contractors.

ement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between E1 and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (DSM 2020- 2022) M09096 (E-ENS-R-19) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Response IR-21: 2 3 a) Please refe...

AI summary EfficiencyOne provides responses to Nova Scotia Power Inc. regarding the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, including details on appliance retirement and instant savings programs. It references specific appendices and tables for cost data and notes that participation in these programs is voluntary.

) Paragraph 4(3)(a) of the Regulations is replaced by the following: (a) a laboratory that is accredited to test the energy performance of lighting products by either the Standards Council of http://gazette.gc.ca/rp­pr/p2/2018/2018­10­31/h...

AI summary This text discusses amendments to the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, specifically focusing on changes to paragraph 4(3)(a), subparagraph 4(3)(b)(i), and subsection 5(1). The amendments involve requirements for laboratory accreditation, verification of product performance data, and the use of mathematical models in reporting.

) was used to generate any of the information provided under paragraph (f). (2) Section 5 of the Regulations is amended by adding the following after subsection (2): Mathematical model (3) Despite any provision in these Regulations requiri...

AI summary The document outlines amendments to regulations, including the addition of a mathematical model provision, exceptions for certain energy-using products, and updates to energy efficiency standards, specifically referencing CSA C361-16.

On or after October 1, 2007 and 07 before October 1, 2012 3 Dehumidifiers CSA C749­ CSA C749­07, Table 1B On or after October 1, 2012 and 07 before June 13, 2019 4 Portable 10 C.F.R. Minimum integrated energy factor applicable, based on pr...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory amendments to energy efficiency standards for dehumidifiers, specifying different compliance dates and standards, including references to CSA and CFR regulations.

(2) The table to section 64 of the Regulations is amended by adding the following in numerical order: Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Item Energy­using Product Standard Information 3 Dehumidifiers manufactured on or after 10 C.F.R. (a) if produ...

AI summary This text amends section 64 of the Regulations by adding a new item for dehumidifiers manufactured on or after June 13, 2019. It specifies the standards and information required for portable and whole-home dehumidifiers, including water removal capacity, case volume, integrated energy factor, and standby power.

standard CAN/CSA­C368.1­14 entitled Energy performance of room air conditioners. (CSA C368.1­14) 19 Section 112 of the Regulations is replaced by the following: Energy efficiency standards 112 (1) The energy efficiency standards set out in...

AI summary The text discusses amendments to energy efficiency regulations, specifically replacing the standard for room air conditioners with the CAN/CSA-C368.1-14 standard and updating the periods of manufacture for compliance.

ratio ≥ 11.2 IEER ≥ 12.9 4 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 40 kW and CSA C746­98 Energy On or after December 31, < 70 kW and either without a heating section or with an electric efficiency 1998 and before January 1...

AI summary This text outlines energy efficiency regulations for large air conditioners, specifying minimum energy efficiency ratios (EER and IEER) based on cooling capacity and the applicable standards (CSA C746-98, CSA C746-06, and AHRI 340/360). The regulations are effective on specific dates, indicating a phased implementation.

ratio ≥ 10.0 IEER ≥ 11.6 9 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 19 kW and < CSA C746­98 Energy On or after December 31, 40 kW and a heating section other than an electric heating section efficiency 1998 and before Janua...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for large air conditioners with cooling capacities between 19 kW and 40 kW and non-electric heating sections, specifying different standards and dates for implementation.

ratio ≥ 11.0 IEER ≥ 12.7 12 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 40 kW and < CSA C746­98 Energy On or after December 31, 70 kW and a heating section other than an electric heating section efficiency 1998 and before Janu...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for large air conditioners with cooling capacities between 40 kW and 70 kW, specifying different standards and efficiency ratios based on the model year and heating section type.

ratio ≥ 10.8 IEER ≥ 12.2 15 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 70 kW and < CSA C746­06 for Energy On or after January 1, 2010 223 kW and a heating section other than an electric heating section energy efficiency effic...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency requirements for large air conditioners with specific cooling capacities and heating sections, referencing standards such as CSA C746-06 and AHRI 340/360, and sets minimum energy efficiency ratios (EER and IEER) for different time periods.

IEER ≥ 11.4 TABLE 2 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Item Energy­using Product Standard Energy Period of Manufacture Efficiency Standard 1 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 19 kW and < CSA C746­98 Energy On or aft...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency standards for large air conditioners with cooling capacities between 19 kW and 40 kW. It specifies different standards and periods of manufacture, including CSA C746-98 and CSA C746-06, along with AHRI 340/360, and sets minimum energy efficiency ratios.

efficiency 1998 and before January 1, ratio ≥ 10.8 2010 11 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 40 kW and < CSA C746­06 for Energy On or after January 1, 2010 70 kW and a heating section other than an electric heating s...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency requirements for large air conditioners based on cooling capacity and dates, referencing standards such as CSA C746-06 and AHRI 340/360, with specific efficiency ratios and IEER values applicable from 2010 to 2018.

ratio ≥ 12.2 IEER ≥ 10.9 TABLE 3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Item Energy­using Product Standard Energy Period of Manufacture Efficiency Standard 1 Large air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of ≥ 19 kW and < CSA C746­98 Ene...

AI summary The table outlines energy efficiency standards for large air conditioners with specific cooling capacities, detailing the applicable standards, energy efficiency ratios, and periods of manufacture. Different standards apply depending on the manufacturing date and cooling capacity.

ratio ≥ 11.7 IEER ≥ 10.9 23 (1) The portion of item 1 of the table to section 119 of the Regulations in column 3 is amended by striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (b), by adding “and” at the end of paragraph (c) and by adding the fo...

AI summary The text amends regulations related to energy-using products, specifically large air conditioners, by updating classification standards and information requirements. It introduces new items and modifies existing ones to include details about heating sections and compliance with CSA standards.

umn 3 Column 4 Item Energy­using Product Standard Energy Efficiency Standard Period of Manufacture 1 Large heat pumps that have a CSA C746­98 Energy efficiency ratio ≥ 10.1 On or after cooling capacity of ≥ 19 kW December 31, 1998 and Heat...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency standards for large heat pumps with cooling capacities between 19 kW and 40 kW, specifying different standards and periods of manufacture. It references CSA C746-98 and CSA C746-06, along with AHRI 340/360, and sets minimum efficiency ratios and performance metrics for different timeframes.

n or after January 1, 2010 and before January 1, 2018 (3) Paragraph 2(g) of the table to section 198 of the Regulations is replaced by the following: Column 3 Item Information 2 (g) information that indicates whether the product has a heat...

AI summary The text amends regulations related to energy-using products, specifically updating requirements for large heat pumps manufactured on or after January 1, 2018. It introduces new standards, including energy efficiency ratios, heating capacities, and performance metrics.

C.F.R. §430.32(y)) 34 The definition CSA P.2 in section 257 of the Regulations is repealed. 35 (1) Items 2 and 3 of the table to section 259 of the Regulations are replaced by the following: Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Item Energy­...

AI summary The document repeals CSA P.2 in section 257 of the Regulations and replaces items 2 and 3 in the table to section 259 with updated energy efficiency standards for gas furnaces, specifying an annual fuel utilization efficiency of at least 90% and a period of manufacture from December 31, 2009, to July 3, 2019.

2009 and before July 3, 2019 2.1 Gas furnaces that have an input rate of ≤ 65.92 kW CSA P.2, for Annual fuel utilization efficiency ≥ 90% On or after July 3, (225,000 Btu/h), use single­phase electric current and annual fuel 2019 FER ≤ FER...

AI summary The document outlines efficiency standards for gas furnaces, specifying requirements for annual fuel utilization efficiency and compliance with CSA P.2 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix AA. These standards apply to different types of furnaces and have specific effective dates.

2009 and before component July 3, 2019 3.1 Gas furnaces that are outdoor furnaces, have an input CSA P.2, for Annual fuel utilization efficiency ≥ 78% On or after July 3, rate of ≤ 65.92 kW (225,000 Btu/h), use single­phase annual fuel 201...

AI summary This document outlines regulatory updates for gas furnaces, specifying efficiency standards and compliance periods, referencing Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) guidelines.

260 of the Regulations is replaced by the following: Column 3 Item Information 2 (a) maximum heat input and output nominal capacities, in kW (Btu/h); (3) The table to section 260 of the Regulations is amended by adding the following in num...

AI summary The document updates section 260 of the Regulations by replacing column 3 item 2 and amending the table to include gas furnaces with specific input rates and standards, including requirements for heat input, output, and efficiency.

8 Attachment 1 Page 19 of 80 3/15/2019 Canada Gazette, Part 2, Volume 152, Number 22: Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016 Energy efficiency standards 263 (1) The energy efficiency standards set out in column 2 of t...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency standards for oil-fired furnaces, specifying different standards and periods of manufacture. These standards are based on testing procedures established by various organizations such as the Canadian Standards Association and the Code of Federal Regulations.

ds set out in column 3 of the table to this section apply to gas­fired storage water heaters described in column 1 that are manufactured during the periods set out in column 4. Testing standard (2) A gas­fired storage water heater complies...

AI summary This section outlines energy efficiency standards for gas-fired storage water heaters, specifying testing procedures and compliance requirements based on the CSA P.3-04 standard. Different energy efficiency thresholds apply depending on the period of manufacture.

≥ 0.675 – 0.00039 Vr 2016 and before January 1, 2018 3 Gas­fired storage water heaters that have a first­hour CSA P.3­04 for Must have at least one of On or after January 1, 2018 rating of < 68 L (18 US gallons) energy factor the following...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency regulations for gas-fired storage water heaters, specifying minimum energy factor requirements based on their first-hour rating, effective from January 1, 2018. Standards from CSA P.3-04 and CSA P.3-15 are referenced for compliance.

factor of ≥ 0.6483 – 0.00045 Vs. 6 Gas­fired storage water heaters that have a first­hour CSA P.3­04 for Must have at least one of On or after January 1, 2018 rating of > 284 L (75 US gallons) energy factor the following: CSA P.3­15 for (a...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for gas-fired storage water heaters, specifying minimum energy factor requirements and the information that must be provided to the Minister under the Act.

Energy factor of On or after December 31, 2016 ≥ 0.68 – 0.0005 Vr and before January 1, 2018 3 Oil­fired water heaters that have a first­hour rating of CSA B211­00 for Must have at least On or after January 1, 2018 < 68 L (18 US gallons) e...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency standards for oil-fired water heaters, specifying minimum energy factor requirements that took effect on December 31, 2016, and further updated on January 1, 2018, with specific thresholds defined by CSA standards.

of ≥ 0.2509 – 0.00032 Vs. 4 Oil­fired water heaters that have a first­hour rating of CSA B211­00 for Must have at least On or after January 1, 2018 ≥ 68 L (18 US gallons) but < 193 L (51 US gallons) energy one of the following: factor (a)...

AI summary The text outlines minimum energy efficiency requirements for oil-fired water heaters based on their first-hour rating and energy factor, referencing specific Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standards and compliance dates.

mme lampe pour appareils domestiques, qui a une puissance nominale maximale de 40 W et qui est conçue pour être utilisée à une température ambiante pouvant aller jusqu’à 315 °C. (appliance lamp) 43 (1) The definition general service incand...

AI summary The text updates definitions related to general service incandescent reflector lamps and replaces references to CSA standards in regulatory sections. It specifies bulb shapes, voltage ranges, and excludes certain types of lamps from the definition.

A­C654­14 entitled Fluorescent lamp ballast efficacy measurements. (CSA C654­14) fluorescent lamp ballast means a ballast that is (a) designed to start and operate fluorescent lamps by (i) providing the necessary voltage and current, (ii)...

AI summary The text defines terms related to fluorescent lamp ballasts, including their design, functionality, and exclusion criteria, referencing standards such as CSA C654-14 and 10 C.F.R. §430.32(m)(2)(ii)(B). It outlines specific classifications such as high-frequency and low-frequency ballasts and excludes certain types based on design and use.

Part 430 of Title 10 to the United States Code of Federal Regulations, as amended from time to time. (10 C.F. R. §430.32(m)(2)(ii)(B)) T12 dimming ballast means a fluorescent lamp ballast that (a) is designed for a nominal voltage of at le...

AI summary The text outlines regulations related to T12 dimming ballasts under the United States Code of Federal Regulations and references standards from the Canadian Standards Association. It defines T12 dimming ballasts and specifies conditions under which they are not considered energy-using products.

CSA C654­10, Table 2 for ballast efficacy factor November 14, 2014 2 Fluorescent lamp ballasts, other than T12 CSA CSA C654­14, clause 4 for power factor On or after November 14, dimming ballasts C654­14 2014 CSA C654­14, clause 5.2 for ba...

AI summary The document outlines requirements for fluorescent lamp ballasts, referencing CSA standards and federal regulations. It specifies efficacy and power factor requirements for different types of ballasts, effective from November 14, 2014.

that specified for ballast in table to 10 C.F.R. §430.32(m)(2)(ii)(B) 5 T12 dimming ballasts that are low­frequency CSA CSA C654­14, clause 4 for power factor On or after November 14, and designed to operate two F34T12 lamps C654­14 2014 M...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for T12 dimming ballasts, specifying compliance with CSA C654-14 standards and minimum luminous efficiency as defined in 10 C.F.R. §430.32(m)(2)(ii)(B), effective from November 14, 2014.

that specified for ballast in table to 10 C.F.R. §430.32(m)(2)(ii)(B) 7 T12 dimming ballasts that are low­frequency CSA CSA C654­14, clause 4 for power factor On or after November 14, and designed to operate two F96T12/ES C654­14 2014 Must...

AI summary The text outlines regulations for T12 dimming ballasts, specifying compliance requirements with CSA C654-14 and minimum luminous efficiency standards, effective from November 14, 2014.

that specified for ballast in table to 10 C.F.R. §430.32(m)(2)(ii)(B) 9 T12 dimming ballasts that are low­frequency CSA CSA C654­14, clause 4 for power factor On or after November 14, and designed to operate two F96T12HO/ES C654­14 2014 Mu...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory requirements for T12 dimming ballasts under various standards, including CSA C654-14, and references compliance with 10 C.F.R. §430.32(m)(2)(ii)(B). It also includes a regulatory amendment related to the nominal voltage in the Regulations.

(c) nominal voltage. (2) The portion of item 2 of the table to section 452 of the Regulations in column 1 is replaced by the following: Column 1 Item Energy­using Product 2 Fluorescent lamp ballasts manufactured on or after November 14, 20...

AI summary The text outlines amendments to the table in section 452 of the Regulations, specifically updating entries related to fluorescent lamp ballasts and adding new requirements for T12 dimming ballasts manufactured on or after November 14, 2014, including specifications such as nominal voltage, power factor, and input power.

y standards set out in column 3 of the table to this section apply to ceiling fan light kits described in column 1 that are manufactured during the periods set out in column 4. Testing standard (2) A ceiling fan light kit complies with the...

AI summary This text outlines energy efficiency standards for ceiling fan light kits, specifying that they must comply with the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standard C22.2 No. 250.0, with a total power for lighting of ≤ 190 W, applicable to products manufactured between January 1, 2010, and January 7, 2019.

≤ 190 W 2010 and before 250.0 January 7, 2019 2 Ceiling fan light kits that have at least one socket, that are not CSA Total power for lighting On or after January 7, packaged with a lamp for each socket and that do not have C22.2 No. ≤ 70...

AI summary The text outlines regulations for ceiling fan light kits, specifying power limits, compliance with standards like CSA and 10 C.F.R., and information requirements under the Act. It includes details on socket types, lighting efficacy, and packaging requirements.

ernal power supply; (b) for each voltage output, its nominal output voltage at the highest and lowest settings and information that indicates whether that voltage is AC or DC; (c) its nominal output power, expressed in watts, at the highes...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for labeling external power supplies, including voltage, power settings, efficiency, and verification marks. It also specifies that information must be collected according to a standard set out in a table, which references CSA C381.1 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix Z.

ies, that are manufactured on or CSA C381.1 or 10 C.F.R. after July 1, 2010 and before July 1, 2017 Appendix Z http://gazette.gc.ca/rp­pr/p2/2018/2018­10­31/html/sor­dors201­eng.html 34/80 Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-28 Attachme...

AI summary The text outlines regulations related to external power supplies and battery chargers, referencing specific standards such as CSA C381.1 and 10 C.F.R., with different requirements based on the manufacturing dates of the devices.

se of subsection 5(1) of the Act, the following information must be collected in accordance with CSA C381.2­ 17 or 10 C.F.R. Appendix Y and provided to the Minister in respect of a battery charger: (a) its product class; (b) its rated batt...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for collecting specific information on battery chargers under subsection 5(1) of the Act, referencing CSA C381.2-17 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix Y. It also revises definitions for commercial freezers and refrigerators in the Regulations.

he energy efficiency standards set out in column 3 of the table to this section apply to commercial refrigerators described in column 1 that are manufactured during the periods set out in column 4. Testing standard http://gazette.gc.ca/rp­...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency standards for commercial refrigerators, specifying that they must meet certain criteria based on testing procedures established by CSA C657, Test Procedure A. These standards apply to refrigerators manufactured during specific periods.

2007 and before Procedure A January 1, 2008 2 Commercial refrigerators that are self­contained, closed and not CSA C657, Edaily ≤ 0.00441 V + 2.76 On or after transparent Test January 1, 2008 Procedure A and before January 1, 2010 3 Commer...

AI summary This document outlines energy efficiency standards for commercial refrigerators, specifying different testing procedures and compliance dates. It references CSA C657, Test Procedure A, and sets daily energy consumption limits based on voltage and dates.

2007 and before Procedure A January 1, 2008 5 Commercial refrigerators that are self­contained and transparent CSA C657, Edaily ≤ 0.00607 V + 4.77 On or after Test January 1, 2008 Procedure A and before January 1, 2010 6 Commercial refrige...

AI summary This document outlines energy efficiency standards for commercial refrigerators, specifying different testing procedures and compliance dates. It references CSA C657, Test Procedure A, and sets daily energy consumption limits based on voltage.

Procedure A and before March 27, 2017 8 Commercial refrigerators that are self­contained and open CSA C657, CSA C657, Table 5 On or after Test January 1, 2012 Procedure A and before March 27, 2017 9 Commercial refrigerators that are remote...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory requirements for commercial refrigerators, specifying compliance dates and testing procedures under CSA C657. It also references a renumbering and amendment to a regulation subsection.

07, (ii) it is self­contained, is open or transparent and is manufactured on or after January 1, 2012, or (iii) it is remote­condensing and is manufactured on or after January 1, 2012. 72 Sections 641 and 642 of the Regulations are replace...

AI summary The text outlines revised energy efficiency standards for commercial refrigerator-freezers under sections 641 and 642 of the Regulations. It specifies compliance criteria based on testing procedures established by the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) and sets different energy efficiency standards depending on the period of manufacture.

st Edaily ≤ 0.00964 On or after January 1, 2008 and contained, closed and not transparent Procedure A AV + 1.65 before January 1, 2010 3 Commercial refrigerator­freezers that are self­ CSA C657, Test Edaily ≤ the greater On or after Januar...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency regulations for commercial refrigerator-freezers, specifying standards and testing procedures from 2008 to 2017, referencing CSA C657 and applicable dates for compliance.

setting, the integrated average temperature, expressed in degrees Celsius, at the lowest temperature setting. 2 Commercial refrigerator­freezers that are self­ CSA (a) Edaily; contained, transparent and manufactured on or after C657, (b) A...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for commercial refrigerator-freezers, specifying that self-contained, transparent units manufactured between April 1, 2007, and January 1, 2012, must meet certain temperature performance standards as tested by the Canadian Standards Association.

setting, the integrated average temperature, expressed in degrees Celsius, at the lowest temperature setting. 3 Commercial refrigerator­freezers that are self­ CSA (a) Edaily; contained, open or transparent and manufactured on or C657, (b)...

AI summary The text discusses the temperature settings and testing procedures for commercial refrigerator-freezers, specifying requirements for integrated average temperature and equipment class designation.

(c) for each compartment, its equipment class designation and TDA. 4 Commercial refrigerator­freezers that are remote­ CSA (a) Edaily; condensing and manufactured on or after January 1, C657, (b) for each compartment tested at the lowest t...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for commercial refrigerator-freezers, including equipment class designation, TDA, and temperature testing procedures as per CSA standards.

(c) for each compartment, its equipment class designation and TDA. 5 Commercial refrigerator­freezers that are manufactured CSA (a) Edaily; on or after March 27, 2017 C657, (b) for each compartment tested at the lowest temperature Test set...

AI summary This text outlines requirements for commercial refrigerator-freezers manufactured on or after March 27, 2017, including testing procedures, temperature measurements, and equipment classification under CSA standards.

o a commercial freezer as defined in section 636. TABLE Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Column 4 Item Energy­using Product Standard Energy Efficiency Period of Manufacture Standard 1 Commercial freezers that are self­contained and open, other C...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for commercial freezers, referencing specific Canadian Standards Association (CSA) standards and detailing the periods of manufacture for which these standards apply.

ure A 2008 and before January 1, 2010 4 Commercial freezers that are self­contained, closed and not CSA C657, Test Edaily ≤ 0.0141 V + 2.83 On or after April 1, 2007 transparent and have a volume of ≥ 340 L Procedure A and before January 1...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for commercial freezers, specifying different volume thresholds and compliance dates, along with corresponding test procedures and energy consumption limits.

rocedure A 2012 and before March 27, 2017 8 Commercial freezers that are self­contained and transparent CSA C657, Test Edaily ≤ 0.0332 V + 5.10 On or after April 1, 2007 Procedure A and before January 1, 2010 9 Commercial freezers that are...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency regulations for commercial freezers, specifying standards and testing procedures from 2007 to 2012, referencing CSA C657, Test Procedure A, and daily energy consumption limits.

278.71 m2 (3,000 square feet) and is designed to be cooled to temperatures at or above 0° C and to allow a person to enter. (réfrigérateur­chambre) walk­in door assembly means an assembly that (a) is installed, or is designed to be install...

AI summary The text defines several terms related to refrigeration systems and storage spaces, including walk-in coolers, freezers, door assemblies, and process cooling systems, with specific measurements and design criteria provided.

ct. Limit (2) However, for the purposes of sections 4, 5 and 660, a walk­in door assembly is not considered to be an energy­using product unless it is manufactured on or after June 5, 2017. Energy efficiency standards 660 (1) The energy ef...

AI summary This text outlines energy efficiency standards for walk-in door assemblies manufactured after June 5, 2017. It specifies testing procedures and sets energy efficiency thresholds based on standards from 10 C.F.R. Appendix A and B.

the product is a freight door assembly or passage door assembly, its R­value. Walk­in Panels Energy­using product 662 (1) A walk­in panel is prescribed as an energy­using product. Limit (2) However, for the purposes of sections 4, 5 and 66...

AI summary This document outlines energy efficiency standards for walk-in panels, specifying R-values for structural and floor panels manufactured on or after June 5, 2017. Testing procedures are based on 10 C.F.R. Appendix B, and the standards apply to energy-using products as defined in section 657.

fter January 1, 2020. Energy efficiency standards 666 (1) The following energy efficiency standards apply to a walk­in refrigeration system that is manufactured on or after January 1, 2020: (a) if its condenser is designed and marketed onl...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency standards for walk-in refrigeration systems manufactured after January 1, 2020, specifying minimum annual walk-in energy factors based on the condenser's intended use. It also references testing procedures from 10 C.F.R. Appendix C and mandates the collection and reporting of specific information to the Minister. Additionally, it updates the definition of CSA C802.2-12 to reflect a new standard for dry-type transformers.

, 2016. 80 Sections 749 to 797 of the Regulations are replaced by the following: SUBDIVISION A Electric Motors Definitions 749 The following definitions apply in this Subdivision. CSA C390­10 means the CSA standard CSA C390­10 entitled Tes...

AI summary This text defines 'electric motor' and 'explosion-proof motor' under Subdivision A of the Regulations, specifying criteria such as power range, design, and operational parameters, while excluding certain types of motors.

(a) it was manufactured before February 3, 1995; (b) it was manufactured before November 27, 1999 and is an explosion­proof motor or is part of an integral gear assembly; (c) it was manufactured before January 1, 2011 and it (i) has an eig...

AI summary The text outlines specific criteria for motors that are subject to energy efficiency standards, based on their manufacturing dates and design specifications. These criteria include various motor types and frame dimensions, with different cutoff dates for compliance.

haft that is not a standard shaft, R­shaft or S­shaft, as specified in NEMA MG­1; or (e) it was manufactured before June 1, 2017 and is a medical­imaging motor. Energy efficiency standards 751 (1) The energy efficiency standards set out in...

AI summary The document outlines energy efficiency standards for electric motors, specifying that motors manufactured after June 1, 2017, must meet certain efficiency standards. The standards are based on testing procedures defined by specific standards, such as NEMA MG-1-.

Standard Efficiency Standard 1 Electric motors that are fire­pump motors CSA CSA C390­10, On or after February 3, 1995 C390­10 Table 2 2 Electric motors that are medical­imaging motors CSA NEMA MG­1, On or after June 1, 2017 C390­10 Table...

AI summary The document outlines standards for electric motors based on specific dates and regulations, referencing CSA, NEMA, IEEE, and IEC standards. It includes details on different motor types and the applicable standards and dates for compliance.

A CSA C390­10, On or after January 1, 2011 and motors C390­10 Table 2 before June 1, 2016 6 Electric motors that CSA CSA C390­10, On or after January 1, 2011 and C390­10 Table 2 before June 1, 2016 (a) have an eight­pole construction; (b)...

AI summary The text outlines regulations related to electric motors, specifying standards and compliance dates based on different motor classifications and industry standards such as CSA C390-10, NEMA MG-1, and IEEE 112-2004. It also references information requirements under the Act.

(b) NEMA or IEC design of motor; June 1, 2016 (c) frame type; (d) motor configuration, namely, close­coupled pump motor, vertically mounted solid shaft normal thrust motor, fire­pump motor or motor that is part of an integral gear assembly...

AI summary The text outlines specifications for electric motors, including design standards, configurations, and efficiency testing methods, referencing standards from NEMA, IEC, CSA, and IEEE. It provides details on motor types and testing procedures for compliance.

al pre­rinse spray valve as defined in section 800. TABLE Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Item Energy­using Product Energy Efficiency Standard Period of Manufacture 1 Commercial pre­rinse spray valves Maximum water flow rate ≤ 6.1 L/min (1.6 ga...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for commercial pre-rinse spray valves, specifying maximum water flow rates based on spray force and periods of manufacture. These standards are defined in section 800 and include requirements from 10 C.F.R. §431.266.

m in a commercial dishwasher. Imposing a maximum flow rate would limit the quantity of hot water passing through the product, thereby lowering the energy used by the associated hot water heater. For products manufactured on or after June 2...

AI summary The text discusses amendments to energy performance standards (MEPS) and test procedures for commercial dishwashers, metal halide lamp ballasts, and microwave ovens, aligning them with U.S. standards at specific dates. These changes aim to improve energy efficiency by limiting hot water flow in dishwashers and updating ballast and microwave standards.

y means of microwave energy. For products manufactured on or after March 31, 2019, the Amendment will align the MEPS and test procedures with those applied in the United States on June 17, 2016. Small electric motors Small electric motors...

AI summary The text outlines amendments to Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) and test procedures for microwave energy products, small electric motors, and walk-in coolers and freezers. These amendments align Canadian standards with those of the United States, effective from specific dates starting in 2015 through 2020.

sale in Canada, but the Amendment will provide an equivalent degree of energy efficiency to that provided by the U.S. requirements. Commercial refrigerators, refrigerator­freezers and freezers Commercial refrigerators, refrigerator­freezer...

AI summary The text discusses amendments to energy efficiency standards in Canada, specifically for commercial refrigeration equipment and dehumidifiers. The changes align with U.S. requirements and include expanded scope and more stringent MEPS for products manufactured after specific dates.

n the United States on that same date. This will include expanding the scope to include whole­home dehumidifiers that are designed to be installed with a ducted system. Dry­type transformers Dry­type transformers are used in commercial app...

AI summary The text discusses amendments to energy efficiency standards in Canada, aligning them with U.S. standards for various products including whole-home dehumidifiers, dry-type transformers, external power supplies, and fluorescent lamp ballasts. These amendments will take effect from specific dates and involve changes in scope, MEPS, and test procedures.

nd commercial spaces. For products manufactured on or after November 14, 2014, the Amendment will expand the scope of the category to align Canada’s requirements with the current U.S. requirements. Gas furnaces Gas furnaces are used in res...

AI summary This text discusses amendments to Canada's Energy Efficiency Regulations, 2016, focusing on aligning minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) and test procedures for gas furnaces and large air conditioners with U.S. requirements, effective from specific dates.

or after July 3, 2019, the Amendment will align Canada’s MEPS and test procedures with those that will be applied in the United States for furnace fan energy consumption on that same date. (C) Make minor changes to the scope of standards,...

AI summary The document outlines amendments to energy efficiency standards in Canada, aligning MEPS and test procedures with those in the United States for furnace fans, adding water consumption limits for household appliances, adjusting the scope of chillers, and clarifying standby mode definitions for electronics.

istent with existing U.S. calculations. General service incandescent reflector lamps The Amendment modifies the exclusions to Canada’s scope to ensure alignment with that of the United States. Large condensing units Large condensing units...

AI summary The document discusses amendments to regulatory standards for various products, including large condensing units, electric motors, and traffic signal modules, to align with U.S. standards and update incorporated standards to newer versions.

$−0.3 $64 $64 Commercial refrigeration Remote $72 $251 $178 Self­contained $101 $1,188 $1,087 Dehumidifiers $12 $30 $18 Dry­type transformers $13 $45 $33 External power supplies $97 $187 $89 Fluorescent lamp ballasts $8 $180 $172 Gas furna...

AI summary The text presents a table with various categories and associated costs, including commercial refrigeration, dehumidifiers, dry-type transformers, and others, along with their respective cost values. The data appears to be related to energy efficiency or appliance standards.

den. In general, stakeholders were supportive of the approach to achieve alignment with U.S. regulations across these product categories, which includes the alignment of reporting requirements. Small business lens While the small business...

AI summary Stakeholders support aligning with U.S. regulations for energy-using products, which reduces reporting requirements and benefits small businesses. Natural Resources Canada consulted with the Canadian Federation of Independent Business to estimate impacts and plans outreach to address awareness gaps.

association recommended aligning the period of manufacture with Ontario. Natural Resources has changed the date from February 10, 2016, to July 1, 2017, to align with Ontario. 29 Gas furnaces One manufacturer suggested that because Canada...

AI summary The text discusses the alignment of appliance standards with Ontario, particularly for gas furnaces. A manufacturer argues that aligning with U.S. MEPS for fan energy rating (FER) will increase costs and reduce consumer choice, while Natural Resources Canada disagrees, stating that incremental costs will not lead to significant changes in consumer behavior.

Gas­fired storage water heaters Stakeholders support the Amendment to allow testing and reporting of water heaters to the new UEF rating metric (see previous “Coming into force upon publication — water heaters, import reporting for incorpo...

AI summary Stakeholders support an amendment allowing testing and reporting of water heaters using the new UEF rating metric. Industry associations and manufacturers have requested guidance and clarification from Natural Resources Canada on various aspects of the amendment, including volume tolerance limits, metric conversions, and the accuracy of the UEF MEPS equation for larger models.

y associations and one manufacturer recommended that the Amendment allow EF ratings to continue only for existing models, and that all new models entering the market be required to rate with UEF. The Amendment provides flexibility to repor...

AI summary Industry associations and manufacturers recommend changes to appliance efficiency ratings, such as using UEF instead of EF and retaining EER for large air conditioners and heat pumps. Natural Resources Canada opposes these changes, arguing that EER is useful for understanding peak load requirements and that aligning with U.S. standards may not be appropriate.

es Canada issued a letter of clarification in January 2018 where they clarified the regulatory requirements for make­up air­conditioners and direct expansion dedicated outdoor air systems. Metal halide lamp ballasts One industry associatio...

AI summary Natural Resources Canada has made several regulatory adjustments to appliance standards, including extending the manufacturing period for metal halide lamp ballasts and adjusting requirements for microwave ovens. These changes were made in response to industry requests and aim to align with international standards and facilitate compliance.

tests products in the context of monitoring compliance outcomes with product­specific compliance audits. Depending on the product, in­store audits and/or testing of products are also conducted. Natural Resources Canada also conducts produc...

AI summary The text discusses compliance monitoring through product-specific audits and testing, as well as performance measurement under the Energy Efficiency Regulations. It highlights the role of Natural Resources Canada and the competitive market context, along with the existence of challenge procedures for performance claims.

urnaces are those with an input capacity of not more than 65.92 kW (225 000 Btu/h) and use electricity as the primary heat source to provide heated air to a home through a home’s built­in ductwork. For electric furnaces manufactured on or...

AI summary The document outlines amendments to energy efficiency standards for electric furnaces, commercial gas boilers, and gas-fired instantaneous water heaters. It specifies minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) aligned with U.S. testing standards and sets condensing technology levels for certain appliances, effective from specific dates.

endment would set the MEPS at levels that are currently in place in the United States. Performance would be measured in accordance with testing standards aligned with those of the United States. Gas­fired storage water heaters (commercial)...

AI summary The amendment introduces MEPS levels aligned with U.S. standards for commercial gas-fired and oil-fired water heaters, with more stringent requirements for replacement units and condensing technology. Performance is measured using U.S. testing standards.

States. Performance would be measured in accordance with testing standards aligned with those of the United States. (B) Introduce more stringent MEPS for currently regulated product categories Gas boilers (household) Household gas boilers...

AI summary The text discusses proposed amendments to minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for household gas boilers and gas fireplaces, aligning with U.S. testing standards and introducing more stringent requirements, particularly for heating and decorative gas fireplaces, with some differences compared to British Columbia's standards.

differences resulting from the proposed use of more prescriptive requirements for decorative gas fireplaces than those in British Columbia. 8 The existing testing standard is not being changed. Gas furnaces Gas furnaces use propane or natu...

AI summary The document discusses proposed amendments to energy efficiency regulations, focusing on gas furnaces and oil-fired boilers. It highlights changes to performance standards, including the removal of exclusions for mobile homes and the alignment of testing standards with those in the United States.

ent would set the MEPS at levels that will apply on that same date in the United States. The existing testing standards are being updated but will remain aligned with those of the United States. (C) Introduce labelling and reporting requir...

AI summary The text discusses proposed amendments to energy efficiency standards for heat recovery ventilators and energy-recovery ventilators, aligning with U.S. standards. It highlights the importance of reducing GHG emissions from buildings and the potential benefits of updating regulations to achieve energy efficiency goals.

inclusion but recommended adopting the U.S. Department of Energy revisions to AHRI 1500­2015 as well. Natural Resources Canada agrees, and has directly incorporated the U.S. testing standard. 25 The U.S. Department of Energy prepublished a...

AI summary The document discusses the adoption of U.S. Department of Energy revisions to AHRI 1500-2015 for space heating equipment standards. Natural Resources Canada supports aligning with the highest efficiency standards, while some manufacturers and industry groups advocate delaying alignment until the U.S. rule becomes law. Stakeholders generally support the proposed standards but differ on the timeline for implementation.

nization with the U.S. Department of Energy’s prepublished final rule and welcomes the submission of detailed information regarding problematic installations and their associated impacts and costs. Five manufacturers, three associations, a...

AI summary The text discusses the proposed Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) for gas boilers, with stakeholders suggesting applying the standards to new construction only. Natural Resources Canada acknowledges concerns but believes the industry can manage the transition to condensing technology, emphasizing proper installation and venting.

n condensing technology levels for gas hot water boilers and welcomes the submission of information and data from interested parties regarding the potential impacts of implementing these levels. Five manufacturers and three associations st...

AI summary The document discusses proposed energy efficiency standards for gas hot water boilers and commercial water heaters, with stakeholders providing feedback on their potential impacts. Some stakeholders argue that the proposed standards may not deliver expected energy savings in certain systems, while others support the standards and suggest adjustments to service life and implementation timelines.

ndards in the United States. Market data suggests that all manufacturers have products available at the higher standards. Natural Resources Canada is therefore not considering a change to the date. One manufacturer requested clarification...

AI summary Natural Resources Canada is updating energy efficiency standards for water heaters based on industry feedback and U.S. standards. Modifications include aligning with U.S. levels for replacement units and adjusting equations for metric conversions. Industry associations and manufacturers provided input on MEPS levels and compliance strategies.

ources Canada’s compliance policy for the marking of units for replacement use only. Natural Resources Canada provided clarification on the language and expectations about the marking provision. One manufacturer raised a concern regarding...

AI summary Natural Resources Canada provided clarification on compliance policies for appliance marking and addressed concerns from manufacturers regarding MEPS levels for gas-fired products. Industry groups recommended lowering MEPS for commercial water heaters, but Natural Resources Canada disagreed, citing market data. Definitions were aligned with the U.S., and certain products were excluded due to limited market presence.

s water heaters from the scope. Market data suggests that this type of product has very limited market share in Canada; therefore, Natural Resources Canada did not include it. Gas fireplaces One industry association requested that the Amen...

AI summary The document discusses the exclusion of certain water heaters from regulatory scope due to limited market share in Canada. It also addresses gas fireplaces, including stakeholder input on implementation timelines, mandatory labelling, pilot light limits, and testing requirements. Natural Resources Canada has adjusted some proposals based on industry feedback.

certain replacement scenarios for mobile homes. Natural Resources Canada disagrees with this, as drop­in replacement furnaces for mobile homes that are compliant with the proposal are available. Natural Resources Canada pre­consulted on ch...

AI summary Natural Resources Canada has addressed concerns regarding furnace efficiency standards for mobile homes and relocatable buildings, creating a new category with specific MEPS and marking requirements. Stakeholders raised issues with condensate freezing in relocatable buildings, leading to revised standards for heat/energy recovery ventilators and fan efficacy reporting.

rate at low outdoor temperatures. Natural Resources Canada agrees and will not require testing and reporting at −25 °C for products that are marked for installation in regions with mild winters. One manufacturer recommended that the Amendm...

AI summary Natural Resources Canada discusses amendments to energy performance standards for heating products, including considerations on testing at low temperatures, product labelling, and the use of airflow ratings. They also address the incompatibility of the Passive House Institute testing standard with current regulations.

2 930 kW (10,000,000 Btu/h). 15 Subsection 316(2) of the Regulations is replaced by the following: Limits (2) However, a gas boiler is not considered to be an energy­using product (a) for the purpose of section 4 unless (i) it is a househo...

AI summary This text outlines changes to regulations regarding gas boilers, including revised definitions and energy efficiency standards for both household and commercial boilers, with specific dates and testing procedures.

and before September 1, 2010 2 Household gas boilers that are intended CSA P.2 for annual fuel Annual fuel utilization efficiency On or after for low pressure steam systems utilization efficiency ≥ 80% September 1, 2010 and before No conti...

AI summary The text outlines efficiency requirements for household gas boilers intended for low-pressure steam systems, specifying minimum annual fuel utilization efficiency and restrictions on pilot lights and standby/off-mode power consumption.

No continuously burning pilot light September 1, 2012 5 Household gas boilers that are intended CSA P.2 for annual fuel Annual fuel utilization efficiency On or after for hot water systems and have tankless utilization efficiency ≥ 82% Sep...

AI summary The text outlines regulations for household gas boilers with tankless domestic water heating coils, specifying minimum annual fuel utilization efficiency and requirements for eliminating continuously burning pilot lights, effective from September 1, 2012, and further updated to January 15, 2021, with additional standby and off-mode power limits.

Standby power ≤ 9 W Off­mode power ≤ 9 W 6 Household gas boilers that are intended CSA P.2 for annual fuel Annual fuel utilization efficiency On or after for hot water systems and do not have utilization efficiency ≥ 82% September 1, 2012...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for household gas boilers, specifying requirements for annual fuel utilization efficiency and standby/off-mode power consumption, with different compliance dates for various standards.

adding the following after item 2: Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Item Energy­using Product Standard Information 3 Household gas boilers CSA P.2 for (a) type of fuel used; manufactured on or after information set out in (b) type of central hea...

AI summary This section outlines requirements for household gas boilers manufactured on or after January 15, 2021, specifying information that must be included in product standards, such as fuel type, heating system type, efficiency ratings, and power consumption details.

with testing procedures established by the standard set out in column 2 of Table 1 that are applicable to an oil­fired boiler as defined in section 319. Energy­efficiency standards — commercial (3) The energy efficiency standards set out i...

AI summary This document outlines energy efficiency standards for commercial oil-fired boilers, specifying that they must meet standards set in column 2 of Table 2, applicable to boilers manufactured on or after January 1, 2021, and tested in accordance with procedures from 10 C.F.R. Appendix A.

Standby power ≤ 11 W Off­mode power ≤ 11 W 5 Household oil­fired boilers that are ASHRAE 103 for annual Annual fuel utilization On or after intended for hot water systems and do not fuel utilization efficiency efficiency​ ≥ 84% September 1...

AI summary The text outlines specifications for household oil-fired boilers, focusing on standby and off-mode power consumption, annual fuel utilization efficiency, and the requirement for automatic water temperature adjustment devices. These standards are effective from September 1, 2012, and updated to January 15, 2021.

ired boilers manufactured on or after December 31, 1998 and before September 1, 2010 2 Household oil­fired boilers manufactured on or after September 1, 2010 and before January 15, 2021 (2) The table to section 322 of the Regulation is ame...

AI summary The document amends regulations related to household oil-fired boilers, specifying new standards for boilers manufactured after January 15, 2021. It outlines additional information requirements, including efficiency metrics, power consumption, and water heating features.

or (b) it is a commercial electric water heater that is manufactured on or after January 1, 2020. 27 Subsection 372(2) of the Regulations is replaced by the following: Testing standard (2) An electric water heater described in column 1 com...

AI summary The text outlines updated energy efficiency standards for electric water heaters, specifying compliance requirements based on their type, inlet location, and volume rating, with testing procedures defined by CSA C191-04 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix B.

Column 2 Column 3 Item Energy­using Product Standard Information 1 CSA P.3­04 (a) its input rate, in kW (Btu/h); (b) its recovery efficiency; http://www.gazette.gc.ca/rp­pr/p1/2018/2018­10­20/html/reg3­eng.html 36/44 Date Filed: March 29,...

AI summary This document lists energy-using products and their associated standards, including household gas-fired storage water heaters manufactured between February 3, 1995, and January 1, 2018, and the specific information required for each, such as input rate, recovery efficiency, and energy factor.

(f) its Vr; and (g) its energy factor.

AI summary The text references two metrics: Vr- and energy factor, likely related to appliance performance or efficiency standards.

2 Household gas­fired storage water heaters that are CSA P.3­04, if a certification body (a) its input rate, in kW (Btu/h); manufactured on or after January 1, 2018 has verified that the product is in (b) its recovery efficiency; complianc...

AI summary The text discusses requirements for household gas-fired storage water heaters manufactured after January 1, 2018, specifying the need for compliance with energy efficiency standards set by CSA P.3-04 and CSA P.3-15, and the information that must be provided, such as input rate, recovery efficiency, and annual energy consumption.

5(b) and 6(b) of Table 1 to section 376. 3 Commercial gas­fired storage water heaters, that have CSA P.3­15 (a) its uniform energy factor; an input rate of > 21.97 kW (75,000 Btu/h) but ≤ 30.5 (b) its Vr; kW (105,000 Btu/h), have a Vr of ≤...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for commercial gas-fired storage water heaters with specific input rates, energy factors, and manufacturing dates, including criteria for uniform energy factor, volume rating, and fuel type.

(f) information that indicates whether it is a replacement unit. 4 Commercial gas­fired storage water heaters, other 10 C.F.R. Appendix A (a) its thermal efficiency; than those described in item 3, that are manufactured (b) its standby los...

AI summary This text outlines requirements for commercial gas-fired storage water heaters manufactured on or after January 1, 2020, including specifications such as thermal efficiency, standby loss, and fuel type. It also revises the definition of oil-fired water heaters, specifying a minimum Vr of 76 L and categorizing them as household or commercial based on input rate.

ce with testing procedures established by the standard set out in column 2 that are applicable to a oil­fired water heater as defined in section 378. Energy efficiency standards — commercial (3) The energy efficiency standards set out in c...

AI summary This text outlines energy efficiency standards for commercial oil-fired water heaters, specifying testing procedures from 10 C.F.R. Appendix A and reorganizing table items under section 380 of the Regulations.

Column 2 Column 3 Item Energy­using Product Standard Information 1 Household oil­fired water heaters that are CSA B211­00 (a) its input rate, in kW (Btu/h); manufactured on or after February 3, 1995 and (b) its recovery efficiency; before...

AI summary The document lists household oil-fired water heaters manufactured between February 3, 1995, and January 1, 2018, and specifies the standards (CSA B211-00) and information required for these products, including input rate, recovery efficiency, annual energy consumption, first-hour rating, volume rating, and energy factor.

(e) its Vr; and (f) its energy factor.

AI summary The text references 'Vr-' and 'energy factor' as parameters related to appliance performance, likely in the context of efficiency standards or regulations.

2 Household oil­fired water heaters that are CSA B211­00, if a certification body (a) its input rate, kW (Btu/h); manufactured on or after January 1, 2018 has verified that the product is in (b) its recovery efficiency; compliance with the...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for household oil-fired water heaters manufactured after January 1, 2018, specifying compliance with energy efficiency standards set by CSA B211-00 and CSA P.3-15, including metrics such as input rate, recovery efficiency, and energy factor.

ndards set out in column 3 of the table to this section apply to gas­fired instantaneous water heaters described in column 1 that are manufactured on or after January 1, 2020. Testing standards (2) A gas­fired instantaneous water heater co...

AI summary This text outlines energy efficiency standards for gas-fired instantaneous water heaters with a maximum flow rate of less than 6.4 L/min, manufactured on or after January 1, 2020. It refers to testing procedures established by CSA P.3-15 and requires a uniform energy factor of at least 0.86.

Column 2 Column 3 Item Energy­using Product Standard Information 1 Household gas­fired instantaneous water heaters manufactured on or after CSA P.3­15 (a) its uniform energy factor; January 1, 2020 (b) its Vr; (c) the fuel it uses; (d) its...

AI summary This document outlines energy efficiency standards for gas-fired instantaneous water heaters, specifying requirements for household and commercial units manufactured on or after January 1, 2020. It includes details such as uniform energy factor, volume rating, fuel type, input rate, and maximum flow rate.

th a cooling capacity <19 kW (<65 000 Btu/h) manufactured on or after September 23, 2019, the Amendment would set the MEPS to levels that will apply on that same date in the United States. For SPVACs and SPVHPs with a cooling capacity ≥19...

AI summary The text outlines amendments to Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) for specific cooling and refrigeration equipment, aligning them with U.S. standards based on manufacturing dates. It also introduces reporting requirements for portable air conditioners.

­ energy benefits related to energy efficiency, such as increased occupant comfort, better indoor air quality and minimizing risks of depressurization in new constructions with better envelopes. The analysis has quantified costs and benefi...

AI summary The text discusses the benefits of an amendment to energy efficiency standards, including improved occupant comfort and indoor air quality, and the prevention of low-efficiency products entering the market. It also outlines the administrative burden associated with the amendment and the benefits of making energy efficiency data publicly available.

at of the United States to ensure thermoelectric products are included. Natural Resources Canada confirms that thermoelectric miscellaneous refrigeration products would be included in the scope. Clean water pumps One manufacturer suggested...

AI summary Natural Resources Canada is considering aligning Canadian efficiency standards with those of the United States for thermoelectric products and clean water pumps. Manufacturers have raised concerns about third-party verification, but Natural Resources Canada maintains that it is essential for ensuring compliance and fairness.

g is already required to demonstrate compliance with the U.S. requirements. Natural Resources Canada is proposing to maintain its third­ party verification requirement for this product category. Walk­in coolers and freezers Two industry as...

AI summary Natural Resources Canada is proposing to maintain third-party verification requirements for certain products, including walk-in coolers and freezers. Industry stakeholders have raised concerns about the availability of certification bodies and the feasibility of testing standards. The proposal aligns with U.S. standards and includes new product marking requirements.

that all products are treated with the same level of scrutiny and are assessed the same way. Natural Resources Canada is proposing to maintain third­party verification for this product category. Central air conditioners and heat pumps Natu...

AI summary The document discusses proposals and industry feedback on energy efficiency standards for air conditioners and heat pumps, including third-party verification and off-mode power consumption requirements. Natural Resources Canada is considering excluding three-phase equipment from off-mode power requirements due to the need for further research. Industry associations have raised concerns about verification requirements for portable air conditioners to maintain a common North American market.

ator that uses an absorption refrigeration system; or (b) a miscellaneous refrigeration product. (réfrigérateur) 4 Paragraphs 40(a) to (p) of the Regulations are replaced by the following: (a) less than 70 L (2.5 cubic feet); (b) 70 to 126...

AI summary The text outlines changes to regulations regarding refrigerator and combination refrigerator-freezer product types and energy efficiency standards, including updated capacity classifications and references to CSA C300-15 standards.

ction apply to single­phase single package central air conditioners described in column 1 that are manufactured during the periods set out in column 4. Energy efficiency standards — three­phase (1.1) The energy efficiency standards set out...

AI summary This text outlines energy efficiency standards for single-phase and three-phase single package central air conditioners, specifying applicable standards and periods of manufacture. It references specific standards such as CSA C656-05 and CSA C656-14 and sets minimum seasonal energy efficiency ratios.

efficiency ratio 2010 and before January 1, ≥ 12.0 2017 5 Single package central air conditioners that are CSA C656­05 for Seasonal energy On or after January 1, 2017 through­the­wall seasonal energy efficiency efficiency ratio ≥ ratio 12....

AI summary The document outlines minimum seasonal energy efficiency ratio (SEER) requirements for single package central air conditioners, including specific standards and dates for compliance. It references CSA C656-05 and CSA C656-14 standards, as well as 10 C.F.R. Appendix M for off mode power consumption limits.

Column 2 Column 3 Item Energy­using Product Standard Information 1 Single package central air conditioners, other than those that are CSA C656­05 (a) product classification set through­the­wall, manufactured on or after February 3, 1995 an...

AI summary The document outlines standards for single package central air conditioners, specifying product classification, cooling capacity, and seasonal energy efficiency ratio as defined by CSA C656-05.

efficiency ratio; and (d) phase of electric current. 4 Single package central air conditioners that are CSA C656­05 (a) product classification set through­the­wall, manufactured on or after February 3, 1995 and out in column II of Table 1...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for single package central air conditioners, specifying product classification, cooling capacity, and seasonal energy efficiency ratio as defined by CSA C656-05.

(c) seasonal energy efficiency ratio. 5 Single package central air conditioners that are CSA C656­05 for (a) product classification set single­phase and information set out in out in column II of Table 1 to through­the­wall, paragraphs (a)...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for single package central air conditioners, including product classification, cooling capacity, seasonal energy efficiency ratio, and off mode power consumption, referencing CSA C656-05 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix M.

consumption; and (e) phase of electric current. 6 Single package central air conditioners that are CSA C656­05 for (a) product classification set three­phase and information set out in out in column II of Table 1 to through­the­wall, parag...

AI summary The text outlines updated regulations for single package central air conditioners, specifying requirements such as product classification, cooling capacity, and energy efficiency standards. It also modifies subsections related to energy-using products and their eligibility under the regulations.

f Energy efficiency On or after January 1, 2011 and < 19 kW (65,000 Btu/h) ratio ≥ 9.0 before September 23, 2019 2 Single package vertical air conditioners that have a cooling capacity of Energy efficiency On or after September 23, 2019 <...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency requirements for single package vertical air conditioners with varying cooling capacities, specifying different efficiency ratios effective from different dates. It also references the replacement of a section of the Regulations with new requirements for information collection in accordance with CSA C746-17.

consumption ≤ 30 W 3 Split­system central air conditioners that are CSA C656­05 Seasonal energy On or after February 3, 1995 small­duct and high­velocity efficiency ratio and before January 1, 2017 ≥ 11.0 4 Split­system central air conditi...

AI summary This text outlines updated efficiency standards for split-system central air conditioners, specifying seasonal energy efficiency ratios and off-mode power consumption limits. It also references regulatory changes under section 135 of the Regulations, which require the collection and submission of specific information to the Minister.

riods set out in column 4. (2) The heading of the table to section 205 is replaced by the following: TABLE 2 (3) Section 205 is amended by adding the following before Table 2: TABLE 1 Column 3 Column 1 Column 2 Column 4 Energy Efficiency I...

AI summary The document amends section 205 by replacing the table heading and adding a new table with columns for energy-using products, standards, and periods of manufacture, focusing on energy efficiency requirements for heat pumps.

2 Single package heat pumps CSA C656­14 for information (a) product classification set out that are single­phase, other set out in paragraphs (a) in column II of Table 1 to than those that are to (e) CSA C656­14; through­the­wall, manufact...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for single package heat pumps manufactured on or after January 1, 2017, referencing CSA C656-14 and 10 C.F.R. Appendix M for product classification, cooling and heating capacities, and energy efficiency metrics.

n vending Edaily ≤ 0.00392 � V + 2.04 On or after January 8, 2019 machines 45 Section 649 of the Regulations is replaced by the following: Information 649 For the purpose of subsection 5(1) of the Act, the information set out in column 3 o...

AI summary Section 649 of the Regulations is updated to require the collection of specific information regarding refrigerated beverage vending machines, including daily energy consumption, vendible capacity, and classification details, in accordance with ASHRAE 32.1 standards.

of ASHRAE 32.1 (b) if the product is Class A or Class B; and (c) V. 3 Refrigerated beverage vending machines manufactured on or CSA C804 (a) Edaily; after January 8, 2019 (b) if the product is Class A, Class B, Combination A, or Combinatio...

AI summary The text outlines specific standards and requirements for refrigerated beverage vending machines, referencing ASHRAE 32.1 and CSA C804, including classifications, daily energy consumption, and surface area transparency.

≥ 9.091 x 10­5 x qnet + 0.530 4 Walk­in freezer dedicated condensing refrigeration systems for use indoors with a net Annual walk­in energy On or after refrigeration capacity of ≥1900 W (6,500 Btu/h) factor ≥ 0.703 July 10, 2020 5 Walk­in...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency standards for walk-in freezer and cooler units, specifying minimum annual energy factors and effective dates starting from July 10, 2020, based on refrigeration capacity.

Annual walk­in energy On or after factor ≥ 2.638 July 10, 2020 8 Walk­in freezer unit coolers with a net refrigeration capacity of <4540 W (15,500 Btu/h) Annual walk­in energy On or after factor July 10, 2020 ≥ 1.575x 10­5 x qnet + 1.146 9...

AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency regulations for walk-in cooler and freezer units, specifying annual walk-in energy factors and effective dates. It references an amendment to Section 667 of the Regulations and cites a link to the Canada Gazette for further details.

r pump as defined in section 804. Information 807 For the purpose of subsection 5(1) of the Act, the following information must be provided to the Minister in respect of a clean water pump: (a) its nominal power, in kilowatts; (b) the impe...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for providing specific information about clean water pumps under a regulatory framework, including details such as power, impeller diameter, type, speed of rotation, mode of operation, and energy index. It also includes provisions on when the regulations come into force and footnotes referencing energy efficiency standards.

to retire; this is supported by historical uptake 27 of this measure. Conversely, there are relatively high number of opportunities for 28 freezer retirements. EfficiencyOne updated the measure mix to reflect this insight, 29 informed by h...

AI summary The text discusses the retirement of appliances, noting historical uptake of this measure and a high number of opportunities for freezer retirements. EfficiencyOne updated the measure mix based on historical trends from the Appliance Retirement program.

Exit Signs (CFL hardwire kit, LED, or EL(=15 [5]; 16 [4] [6] [8]) & MP(persistence value not specified, however sources referenced CALMAC electroluminescent) 15; 16 included numerous persistence and retention studies) EL(=0.6 [4] [8]) & MP...

AI summary The text provides data on the rated lifetimes and persistence values of various types of lighting technologies, including exit signs, halogen lamps, and HID fixtures, citing sources such as CALMAC and the VT TRM. It also references persistence and retention studies.

] Integral CFL (Health/Medical - DEER Hospital) 0.9 EL(=0.9) [33] [35] Integral CFL (Health/Medical - Nursing DEER Home) 0.9 EL(=0.9) [33] [35] Integral CFL (Lodging - Hotel) DEER 0.9 EL(=0.9) [33] [35] Integral CFL (Lodging - Motel) DEER...

AI summary The text lists various applications of Integral CFL (Compact Fluorescent Lamp) across different sectors, including health/medical, lodging, manufacturing, office, restaurant, and retail, with corresponding energy efficiency values and references to DEER and other citations.

information of ozone depletingby NRCan to substances efficiencyPEI (refrigerants) mustasbewell as to other completed provincial, by an individual territorial certified or municipal as a “registered organizations handler” as specifiedor uti...

AI summary The text references regulations related to ozone-depleting substances and the need for certified handlers, as well as incentive programs and environmental protection acts. It mentions the Cap. E-9 (Ozone Layer Protection Regulations) and Efficiency PEI, but lacks a clear narrative or argument.

Attachment 1, Page 15 of 30 Recommendation Text Source Status Comments Expected Period of Completion Improve the process for tracking appliances retired through the pilot. This year, the savings of those appliances retired through the ARet...

AI summary The document recommends improving the tracking process for appliances retired through the ARet pilot by using established unitary savings values and clearly identifying these appliances. This recommendation was implemented in 2018 and agreed to by ENS.

2.5 Unitary Savings Review For those program components whose savings were established on a unitary basis, the Evaluator reviewed the savings presented in the tracking sheet. First, consistency with the savings results of the previous eval...

AI summary The Evaluator reviewed unitary savings for programs like Efficient Product Installation and Business Energy Rebates, ensuring consistency with prior evaluations. Methods included using technical reference manuals, product specifications, and sampling popular products to calculate average characteristics. Savings from the 2017 evaluation were reapplied in 2018 for certain measures.

2.8 Metering Analysis For Appliance Retirement, the Evaluator ensured that the appliances retired in 2018 were adequately metered by developing a sampling plan and conducting a site visit to the appliance recycling facility to observe the...

AI summary The Evaluator assessed metering adequacy for 2018 appliance retirements by sampling and visiting a recycling facility. Due to temperature deviations in the metering room exceeding protocol ranges, 2018 data was deemed unusable, leading to the application of 2017 metering results for evaluation purposes.

Appliance Retirement A total of 5,595 appliances were retired or replaced through ARet in 2018, generating 2.657 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.378 MW in net peak demand savings. The total number of appliances retired in 2018 w...

AI summary In 2018, 5,595 appliances were retired or replaced through ARet, resulting in 2.657 GWh of net electrical energy savings and 0.378 MW of net peak demand savings. Savings were 4% lower than in 2017 due to a decrease in retired freezers and differences in refrigerator age distribution and part-use factors.

Table 16: Recommendations on Residential Program Components No. Recommendation ARet-R2. Develop and implement a protocol on the heat gun usage process. The Evaluator recommends that ENS formalize the heat gun usage process by developing a...

AI summary The text recommends developing a protocol for heat gun usage in appliance evaluation to ensure non-working appliances are properly identified and excluded from metering samples and program results.

6.2 Fo llow-up on 2017 Evaluation Report Recommendations 33 Table 3: Comparison of ARet Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator xiv Table 4: Instant Savings Net-to-gross Ratio xvii Table 5: Comparison of Instant Savings Tracked and...

AI summary The text presents a table of contents with various tables related to the evaluation of energy efficiency programs, including appliance retirement (ARET), instant savings, and the implementation status of recommendations from a 2017 evaluation report. The tables cover tracked and evaluated savings, survey sample sizes, energy consumption values, and rebate listings.

Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) promotes the retirement of inefficient household appliances, including fullsized and small refrigerators, full-sized and small freezers, and room air conditioners. ARet is designed to educate Nova Scotians abou...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) promotes the retirement of inefficient household appliances by offering cash incentives and free pick-ups. The program provides specific financial rewards for retiring various types of appliances, such as refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners.

Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2018 DSM Evaluation Report In addition, the replacement of inefficient dehumidifiers, refrigerators and freezers paid by DSM funds through HomeWarming are claimed under A...

AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program, including the replacement of inefficient appliances in schools through ARet and the evaluation methods used, such as documentation reviews, interviews, and participant surveys.

ARet Performance ARet aimed to achieve 3.1 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.4 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018. The Evaluator determined that ARet achieved 2.657 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.37...

AI summary ARet achieved 2.657 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.378 MW in net peak demand savings in 2018, with a total of 5,595 inefficient appliances retired or replaced. Savings decreased slightly compared to 2017 due to a reduction in the number of retired freezers.

ARet Market Evaluation Highlights Overall, ARet achieved a very high level of satisfaction among participants, who provided an average satisfaction rating of 9.6 on a 10-point scale. The convenience of the pick-up service, mentioned as the...

AI summary ARet achieved high satisfaction with an average rating of 9.6. Convenience of the pick-up service was the main reason for satisfaction. In 2016, ENS reintroduced a 10-year-old eligibility criterion for appliance disposal after previously requiring appliances over 15 years old.

Table 2: ARet Equivalent Net-to-gross Ratios Gross Savings Effe ects Net Unitary Savings (kWh) Appliance Type Number of Units Consumption of Retired Appliances (kWh) Free- ridership (kWh) Secondary Market Impact (kWh) Participant Spillover...

AI summary The table presents the Net-to-Gross Ratios (NTGR) for various appliance types replaced through the HomeWarming program, showing the relationship between gross savings and net unitary savings. A NTGR of 1 was assumed for HomeWarming due to its direct replacement nature and participant demographics.

The impact evaluation revealed that ARet generated 2.657 GWh in net electricity savings and 0.378 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018, as summarized in Table 3.

AI summary The impact evaluation showed that the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program achieved 2.657 GWh in net electricity savings and 0.378 MW in net peak demand savings at the generator in 2018, as detailed in Table 3.

1.1 Description Through ARet, ENS promotes the retirement of old, inefficient household appliances such as refrigerators, freezers, room air conditioners, and small refrigerators or freezers. ARet educates Nova Scotians about the cost of m...

AI summary ARet is a program by Energy Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) that promotes the retirement of old, inefficient household appliances. It offers financial incentives and free pick-up services, managed by a delivery agent. The program also includes appliance recycling and collaborates with other initiatives like HomeWarming and DSM funds. In 2018, it aimed for 3.1 GWh in electricity savings and 0.4 MW in peak demand savings.

1.2 Follow-up on 2017 Evaluation Report Recommendations ARet was evaluated in 2017 and recommendations were made by the Evaluator for its improvement. Table 7 below provides a brief summary of the implementation status of each recommendati...

AI summary The 2017 evaluation report on the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program outlined recommendations for improvement, and Table 7 summarizes the implementation status of these recommendations.

Table 7: Implementation Status of the 2017 Recommendations for ARet 2017 Recommendations Status 2017 ARet-R1. Continue to perform the metering activity to increase sample sizes. Implemented 2017 ARet-R2. Improve the process for tracking ap...

AI summary Table 7 outlines the implementation status of 2017 recommendations for ARet. ENS implemented R1 by conducting new metering in 2018, improving the metering protocol, and measuring power factor and appliance internal temperature. R2 was also implemented by improving the process for tracking retired appliances.

1.3 Participation History In 2018, 5,275 appliances were retired through ARet, including 3,874 refrigerators, 1,166 freezers, 114 air conditioning units and 121 small refrigerators or freezers.3 Additionally, 60 refrigerators, 165 freezers...

AI summary In 2018, 5,595 appliances were retired or replaced through ARet and HomeWarming, resulting in 4.568 GWh of gross energy savings and 0.640 MW of gross peak demand savings. Since 2012, 46,436 inefficient appliances have been retired and recycled. The number of retired appliances has remained fairly constant since 2015, suggesting ARet remains effective.

2 ARET EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND METHODOLOGY The main objectives of the ARet evaluation are as follows: - › Reporting on participant perspectives - › Calculating program results, namely electrical first-year and lifetime energy savings, pe...

AI summary The ARet evaluation aims to report on participant perspectives and calculate program results such as energy savings and GHG emissions. The methodology includes reviewing program documentation, meeting with the program manager, and preparing data-collection instruments based on the findings.

Type of Appliance Population Sample Size (n) Sampling Error at 90% Confidence Level Refrigerators 3,664 80 ±9.2% Freezers 1,106 78 ±9.1% Air conditioners 84 22 ±15.5% Small refrigerators and freezers 111 20 ±17.1% Total participants 4,6337...

AI summary The document includes a table summarizing the population and sampling error for various appliance types, followed by a section discussing an on-site visit at a recycling facility.

Unitary Savings Review For ARet, the Evaluator reviewed the unitary savings of the retired refrigerators, freezers, air conditioners and small appliances based on the metering data collected by ENS and information found in the literature o...

AI summary The Unitary Savings Review assesses energy savings from appliance retirements through data collected by ENS and ARet. It considers factors like free-ridership and secondary market impacts, and uses survey data to calculate net energy savings per unit. The review includes data from 4,633 participants who retired at least one appliance.

3 ARET MARKET EVALUATION A survey was conducted as part of the ARet evaluation. In addition to the questions designed for impact evaluation purposes, the 200 survey participants were asked questions regarding their motivations for particip...

AI summary A survey of ARet participants found that convenience of pick-up service was the main reason for participation, with high satisfaction levels reported. Most participants recycled or disposed of hazardous materials from their appliances, and most replaced refrigerators or freezers with energy-efficient models.

4.1 Metering Review As recommended in the 2017 Evaluation Report, ENS continued to meter retired appliances in 2018. The Evaluator validated that the appliances were metered adequately by: (1) developing an appliance sampling plan; (2) ass...

AI summary In 2018, ENS continued metering retired appliances as recommended in the 2017 Evaluation Report. The Evaluator validated adequacy by developing a sampling plan, assisting with new metering equipment, visiting the recycling facility, and analyzing raw data to calculate average energy consumption. The metering targeted full-sized fridges and freezers by manufacture-year class, with a recommended sample size of 140 appliances.

Table 9: ARet Metering Sample Size by Appliance Manufacture-year and Type Appliance Type and Manufacture-year Class Sample Target Metered Sample9 Refrigerators 1994 and earlier 30 31 1995-2001 30 23 2002 and later 40 33 Freezers 1994 and e...

AI summary Table 9 provides sample sizes for ARet metering by appliance type and manufacture-year. In 2017, new metering equipment improved data quality, but power factor (PF) measurements were still based on instantaneous values. ENS was recommended to conduct continuous PF measurements in 2018, leading to the purchase of new loggers.

Appliance Retirement 11 9 The metered sample presented in Table 9 includes only the number of appliances for which all the necessary information was available to allow the Evaluator to complete the analysis. Four appliances were excluded o...

AI summary The 2018 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the metering process for appliance retirement, noting that ENS successfully implemented new metering equipment but faced challenges with room temperature control. The metering room's relocation near a loading bay door led to temperature fluctuations, affecting consumption data compared to 2017.

Table 10: Retired Unit Average Energy Consumption by Appliance Manufacture-year and Type Manufacture-year Class Average Energy Consumption 2017 Final Sample Size Margin of Error Refrigerators 1994 and earlier 58.9 kWh/cu. ft 13 23.9% 1995-...

AI summary Table 10 shows the average energy consumption of retired appliances by manufacture-year and type. The Evaluator recommends continuing metering activities in 2019 and relocating the metering room to ensure a controlled temperature due to insufficient data from 2017 and 2018.

4.3 Refrigerator Unitary Savings This subsection summarizes the main parameters used to determine the unitary savings of full-sized refrigerators retired through ARet in 2018. The Evaluator revised the gross unitary savings value by updati...

AI summary This section discusses the calculation of unitary savings for full-sized refrigerators retired through the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program in 2018. Key parameters revised include average energy consumption of retired and replacement refrigerators and part-use factors, resulting in adjusted annual energy consumption values of 687 kWh and 265 kWh, respectively.

Table 12: Final Energy Consumption Values for Refrigerators Measured Consumption (kWh/year) Part-use Factor Final Consumption (kWh/year) Retired Refrigerators 982 0.70 687 Replacement Refrigerators 378 0.70 265 Two effects were considered...

AI summary Table 12 shows energy consumption values for retired and replacement refrigerators, with 687 kWh/year and 265 kWh/year respectively. Net unitary savings of 389 kWh per retired refrigerator were calculated, considering free-ridership and secondary market impacts.

Table 13: Net Savings per Refrigerator Would Have Kept % % % Discard Scenario % Would-be Acquirer Finds an % Alternative · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · % Overall Energy Consumption (kWh/year) Savings the Unit Scenario Alternative Un...

AI summary Table 13 presents net savings per refrigerator based on different discard scenarios, including the proportion of units that would have been kept, discarded, or transferred, and the associated energy consumption and savings. The data highlights the impact of appliance retirement on energy efficiency.

This subsection summarizes the main parameters used to evaluate the unitary savings of full-sized freezers retired in 2018 and how both gross and net unitary savings were determined. The Evaluator revised the gross unitary savings value tr...

AI summary This subsection outlines the evaluation of unitary savings for full-sized freezers retired in 2018, focusing on the calculation of gross and net unitary savings using updated parameters such as average energy consumption and part-use factors.

4.5 Room Air Conditioner Unitary Savings This subsection summarizes the main parameters used to evaluate the unitary savings of room air conditioners retired in 2018. To revise the unitary savings value for air conditioners, the Evaluator...

AI summary This subsection evaluates the unitary savings of room air conditioners retired in 2018. The Evaluator revised parameters such as retired capacity, hours of operation, and SEER. The average annual energy consumption for retired units was 218 kWh, and for replacement units, it was 156 kWh. Net savings were calculated considering free-ridership and secondary market impacts, resulting in an overall savings of 115 kWh per unit retired.

4.6 Small Appliance Retirement This subsection summarizes the main parameters used to determine the unitary savings of small refrigerators and small freezers retired through ARet in 2018. 12 NRCan's Office of Energy Efficiency. Air Conditi...

AI summary This subsection discusses the parameters used to determine the unitary savings of small refrigerators and freezers retired through ARet in 2018. The Evaluator updated key parameters, including a part-use factor of 0.42, based on participant responses about appliance usage patterns.

Table 18 and Table 19 summarize the unitary savings calculations for the small appliances retired through ARet.

AI summary Table 18 and Table 19 present unitary savings calculations for small appliances retired through the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program.

Table 18: Net Savings per Small Refrigerator Would Have Kept Have % % Discard Scenario % Would-be Acquirer Finds an % Alternative % Overall Proportion Ener Consum (kWh/) nption Savings the Unit Scenario Alternative Unit ~ Type rioportion W...

AI summary Table 18 presents net savings per small refrigerator under different scenarios, including appliance retirement (ARET) and the acquisition of new or old units. The data highlights the impact of discarding units and the energy consumption differences between scenarios.

Would Have Kept % Discard % Would-be Acquirer Finds an % Alternative % Overall Ener Consum (kWh/y ption Savings the Unit Scenario Alternative Unit Туре Proportion Without ARet With ARet Net Reduction Yes 60 60% 316 0 316 Yes 50 Old Unit 50...

AI summary The table presents net savings per small freezer under different scenarios, including the retention or disposal of units and the impact of appliance retirement (ARET) on energy consumption. It outlines percentages of units retained, discarded, and transferred, along with energy consumption figures in kWh/year and net reductions in energy use.

4.8 Summary of Unitary Savings Values Table 20 below presents the tracked and revised savings values for each appliance type retired through ARet or replaced under HomeWarming in 2018. As previously mentioned, the same unitary savings as t...

AI summary Table 20 shows the tracked and revised savings values for appliances retired through ARet or replaced under HomeWarming in 2018. The same unitary savings values applied to appliances retired through ARet were also used for four appliances retired from HRCE schools.

Appliance Type Gross Unitary Savings (kWh/yr) Net Unitary Savings (kWh/yr) Tracked Revised Tracked Revised Refrigerator (ARet) 751 687 410 389 Freezer (ARet) 863 945 465 450 Room Air Conditioner (ARet) 215 218 66 115 Small Refrigerator (AR...

AI summary The table presents gross and net unitary savings for various appliances retired through ARet and HomeWarming programs. The gross unitary savings for refrigerators retired through ARet was revised downward due to a lower part-use factor from 2018 survey results.

4.10 Interactive Effects Interactive effects occur in a conditioned space when an implemented energy-efficiency measure has an impact on the energy consumption of other elements in the system, such as heating and cooling equipment. In the...

AI summary The document discusses interactive effects of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program in Nova Scotia, where retiring inefficient appliances can impact heating and cooling loads. While some negative effects are expected during heating periods, these are partially offset by positive effects during cooling periods. The Evaluator concluded that these interactive effects are negligible and set the factor at 0 percent.

Table 22: ARet Equivalent Effective Useful Life Values Appliance Tracked Equivalent EUL (years) Revised Equivalent EUL (years) Revised Gross Lifetime Unitary Savings (kWh) Refrigerator Retirement (ARet) 8 No change 5,496 Freezer Retirement...

AI summary Table 22 presents equivalent effective useful life values for various appliance retirement and replacement programs, including refrigerators, freezers, air conditioners, and dehumidifiers. The table shows no changes in the equivalent effective useful life for most appliances, with specific values provided for each category.

The gross energy and peak demand savings resulting from the retirement of old appliances through ARet (including appliances retired in HRCE schools) and the appliance replacements through HomeWarming are listed in Table 23 below. The total...

AI summary The text discusses energy and peak demand savings from appliance retirements through ARet and HomeWarming programs, providing specific figures and line loss factors applied. It also mentions the contribution of Nova Scotia Power in providing line loss data and calculation methods.

Table 23: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Appliance Type Ap l ia Re ire t t p nc e m en Ho fr ig Re to er a rs Fr ee ze rs Ro A ir om Co d i io t n ne rs Sm l l a Re fr ig to er a rs l Fr Sm l a ee ze rs fr ig Re to er a rs...

AI summary Table 23 provides data on revised gross energy and peak demand savings by appliance type, including the number of units retired, energy savings in kilowatt-hours, and total gross energy savings in gigawatt-hours. The table includes various appliance categories such as refrigerators, freezers, and room air conditioners.

4.13 Participant Spillover For ARet, participant spillover occurs when participants decide to retire or replace other appliances pursuant to participating in the program component and due to its influence. During the telephone survey, part...

AI summary The document discusses participant spillover in the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program, where participants retired additional appliances outside the program due to its influence. Savings from these additional retirements were calculated based on disposal methods and influenced by the program. The spillover level was found to be 0 percent in the current survey, compared to 1, 3, and 4 percent in previous years.

Appliance Retirement A total of 5,595 appliances were retired or replaced through ARet in 2018, generating 2.657 GWh in net electrical energy savings and 0.378 MW in net peak demand savings. The total number of appliances retired in 2018 w...

AI summary In 2018, 5,595 appliances were retired through ARet, resulting in 2.657 GWh and 0.378 MW in savings, slightly lower than 2017 due to fewer freezers retired. Satisfaction with ARet was high, and a new online booking portal was successfully launched. However, data variability affected savings calculations, leading to lower energy savings than planned.

SCREENING QUESTIONS Could I speak with [INSERT NAME]? - 1. Yes [GO TO INTRODUCTION] - 2. No [SAY "Perhaps you can help me anyway." GO TO INTRODUCTION] Hello, my name is _________ from Corporate Research Associates, a Halifax-based survey r...

AI summary This text outlines a screening questionnaire for participants in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program from 2018. The survey aims to evaluate and improve the program by gathering feedback from participants. It includes prompts to confirm participation and ensure the correct individual is being contacted.

Verification and Recall (V Series) V1. Our records indicate that your household participated in Appliance Retirement Program, which removed and recycled [INSERT NUMBER FROM VARIABLE "RF" IN THE SAMPLE] full-sized fridge(s) [INSERT NUMBER F...

AI summary This section of the document is part of a verification and recall process related to the Appliance Retirement Program, asking participants to confirm the number of appliances removed from their homes in 2018. It includes options for confirming, denying, or correcting the quantities of appliances removed, such as full-sized fridges, freezers, and air conditioners.

2018 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report V6. [IF V2d. = YES] How many small stand-alone freezers were picked up in 2018 through the Appliance Retirement Program? [Record number, 98=Don't Know, 99=Refused] V7. [IF V2e. = YES] How many air cond...

AI summary The text contains two questions related to the Appliance Retirement Program in 2018, asking about the number of small stand-alone freezers and air conditioners collected through the program.

ONE APPLIANCE [READ IF V1 = 1 and RF/FZ/SMF/SMZ/AC = 1 OR IF V3/V4/V5/V6/V7=1], Now, I'd like you to think about the [full-sized fridge/full-sized stand-alone freezer/ small fridge/small stand-alone freezer/ air conditioner] you had remove...

AI summary The text prompts the reader to consider a specific appliance removed through a program in 2018, likely related to energy efficiency or appliance retirement initiatives.

[ASK U1 FOR FULL-SIZED FRIDGES (RF) ONLY)] U1. Was the fridge removed through the program the main one used in the home, a second fridge used at least part of the time, or a fridge not used at all? [IF NECESSARY: "A main or primary fridge...

AI summary The document asks whether a removed fridge was the main/primary one used in the home, a secondary/backup fridge, or not used at all, providing definitions and classification options for respondents.

Free-Ridership Section (FR Series) - FR1. Had you already planned to dispose of this [full-sized fridge/full-sized stand-alone freezer/small fridge/small stand-alone freezer/air conditioner] before you heard about Efficiency Nova Scotia's...

AI summary This section of the Free-Ridership Section (FR Series) asks respondents whether they had already planned to dispose of specific appliances before learning about Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program, with options to confirm, proceed to the replacement section, or indicate uncertainty or refusal.

(READ LIST IN RANDOM ORDER) - 1. Have sold it or given it to a private party [example: friend, family member, kijiji] - 2. Have left it on the curb with a "free" sign - 3. Have it removed by the dealer supplying your new appliance - 4. Hav...

AI summary The text outlines various methods for disposing of appliances and asks respondents to indicate the main reason they chose the Efficiency Nova Scotia program for disposal. It includes options for disposal methods and reasons for selecting the program.

- 99. (Refused) [GO TO SO5] SO2. [ASK IF SO1=1] What other appliances were picked up? [DON'T READ, allow multiple responses] - 1. (Dehumidifier)

AI summary The proceeding document includes a section where the respondent is asked to provide information on other appliances picked up, with a dehumidifier listed as one example. This appears to be part of a broader regulatory process involving appliance-related matters.

[ASK TO ALL] - SO5 Since participating in Appliance Retirement Program, have you disposed of other appliances without receiving an incentive? - 1. Yes - 2. No [GO TO SATISFACTION SECTION] - 98. (Don't know) [GO TO SATISFACTION SECTION] - 9...

AI summary The text presents survey questions related to the Appliance Retirement Program, asking participants if they have disposed of other appliances without receiving an incentive and how many such appliances they have disposed of.

[RECORD NUMBER OF EACH APPLIANCE. RANGE: 0-10] - a. Other full-sized fridges - b. Other full-sized stand-alone freezers - c. Other small fridges - d. Other small stand-alone freezers - e. Other air conditioners - f. Dehumidifiers

AI summary The text lists categories of appliances for which the number of each type should be recorded, ranging from 0 to 10. These include various types of fridges, freezers, air conditioners, and dehumidifiers.

[ASK SO7 FOR EACH OF SO6a-f > 0] - SO7. How did you dispose of this/these [INSERT RESPONSE FROM SO6] ? Did you… [READ IN RANDOM ORDER 1-5, ALWAYS READ 96 LAST AND CODE SEPARATELY FOR EACH TYPE OF APPLIANCE AS IN SO6] - 1. Sell it or give i...

AI summary This section asks respondents how they disposed of specific appliances, providing several options such as selling, leaving on the curb, having it removed by a dealer, taking it to a dump or recycling center, or having it picked up by waste management. Respondents may also specify other disposal methods or indicate they don't know.

[ASK SO8 FOR EACH OF SO6a-f > 0 AND SO7=3, 4 or 5] - SO8. Was this/these [INSERT RESPONSE FROM SO6] still in working order at the moment of its disposal? [CODE SEPARATELY FOR EACH TYPE OF APPLIANCE AS IN SO6] - 1. Yes - 2. No - 98. (Don't...

AI summary The text contains survey questions related to appliance disposal and usage, specifically asking whether appliances were still functional at the time of disposal and what respondents would have done with them if they had not participated in the 2018 Appliance Retirement program.

Program Satisfaction (S Series) And now a few questions about the Appliance Retirement Program overall. - S1. What do you think happens to appliances after they are picked up by the program? PROBE: Anything else? [DON'T READ; MULTIPLE RESP...

AI summary The text presents survey questions about the Appliance Retirement Program, focusing on what happens to appliances after pickup and overall program satisfaction. Respondents are asked to rate their satisfaction on a scale from 1 to 10.

APPENDIX II ARET: PARTICIPANT SURVEY RESULTS The participant survey results are presented in the following tables. Responses sum to more than 100% due to rounding U1. Was the refrigerator removed through the program the main one used in th...

AI summary The survey asks participants about the usage status of refrigerators removed through the program, with responses potentially summing to more than 100% due to rounding.

Use of Retired Refrigerators 2018 Sample Size 80 Used as primary/main 79% Used as secondary/spare 18% Not being used 4% Base: Respondents who retired a full-sized refrigerator Responses sum to more than 100% due to rounding U2. Approximate...

AI summary The document provides data on the use of retired refrigerators in 2018, showing that 79% were used as primary/main appliances, 18% as secondary/spare, and 4% were not used. It also includes statistics on the age of retired appliances, with an average age of 16.6 years for refrigerators.

U3. Which of the following describes the condition of the [full-sized fridge/full-sized stand-alone freezer/small fridge/small stand-alone freezer/air conditioner] when you decided to have it picked up by the program?

AI summary The question asks about the condition of a specific appliance when it was decided to have it picked up by the program.

2018 Condition of Appliance Refrigerators (%) Stand-alone Freezers (%) Air Conditioners (%) Small Refrigerators (#) Small Freezers (#) Sample Size 80 78 22 10 10 Worked well 44% 58% 59% 3 8 Worked okay, but had some problems 56% 38% 27% 5...

AI summary The text presents survey data from 2018 on the condition of various appliances, including refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners. It includes percentages of appliances that worked well, had some problems, or did not work, along with sample sizes and responses to a question about how many months appliances were plugged in and running.

U5. You told me that you used to turn on your air conditioner for [INSERT U4] months. On what basis did you decide to turn on your air conditioner? Decision to Turn on Air Conditioner 2018 Sample Size 10 According to the temperature/When i...

AI summary The text discusses a respondent's decision to turn on their air conditioner and their prior plans to dispose of an appliance before learning about Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement program. It includes survey data on the basis for turning on air conditioners and appliance disposal intentions.

FR3. If you had kept the [fridge], would you have placed it in the kitchen or somewhere else? Location Refrigerator would be Placed if Kept 2018 Sample Size 4 (#) Somewhere else (other than kitchen) 4 Base: Respondents who would not have d...

AI summary This section asks respondents where they would have placed a fridge if they had kept it and how they would have disposed of various appliances if a program had not been available. The data shows that 25% would have taken it to a dump or recycling center, and 25% would have had it picked up by waste management.

RE3a. Was the replacement [full-sized fridge/full-sized stand-alone freezer/small fridge/small standalone freezer/air conditioner] new or used? 2018 Replacement Refrigerators (%) Stand-alone Freezers (%) Air Conditioners (#) Small Refriger...

AI summary The text presents data on appliance replacements in 2018, including the percentage of new versus used appliances replaced and the sources from which these replacements were obtained. It includes statistics on refrigerators, freezers, and air conditioners.

RE4. Was the replacement [full-sized fridge/full-sized stand-alone freezer/small fridge/small standalone freezer/air conditioner] an ENERGY STAR or high efficiency model? The Replacement 2018 Appliance Was an ENERGY STAR certified or High...

AI summary The text discusses the replacement of various appliances (refrigerators, freezers, air conditioners) with ENERGY STAR or high efficiency models, providing statistics on the percentage of replacements that met these criteria. It also asks whether other ineligible appliances were collected during the process and lists examples of such appliances.

SO3. Was this [INSERT RESPONSE FROM SO2] in working order? Were Other Appliances in Working Order Sample Size 3 Yes 3 No 1 Base: Respondents who had other appliances picked up that did not qualify for an incentive Multiple response SO4. Wh...

AI summary The text discusses survey results regarding appliance disposal and participation in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement program. Respondents indicated that most appliances were in working order, and if not picked up by ENS, they would have sold or given them away. A small percentage of participants disposed of other appliances without receiving a rebate.

SO6. How many [READ OPTIONS IN ORDER] have you disposed of without receiving an incentive since participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program? Average Number of Appliances Disposed of Without Receiving 2018 a Rebat...

AI summary The document asks how many appliances have been disposed of without receiving an incentive since participating in Efficiency Nova Scotia's Appliance Retirement Program. It includes a table showing the average number of appliances disposed of without receiving a rebate for various categories.

SO7. How did you dispose of this/these [INSERT RESPONSE FROM SO6]? Did you… 2018 How Disposed of Appliances That Did Not Receive Incentive Other Full sized Refrigerators (#) Other Full-sized Stand-Alone Freezers (#) Other Air Conditioners...

AI summary The table shows how respondents disposed of appliances that did not receive incentives under the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program. Most appliances were picked up by waste management companies during collection days, while some were taken to dumps or recycling centers, and a few were left on the curb with a 'free' sign.

SO8. Was this/these [INSERT RESPONSE FROM SO6] still in working order at the moment of its disposal? Appliance in 2018 Working Order When Disposed Other Full-sized Refrigerators (#) Other Full-sized Stand Alone Freezers (#) Other Air Other...

AI summary The document asks whether appliances were still in working order at the time of disposal. It includes a table with data on different appliance types and their working condition upon disposal, based on a sample of respondents who disposed of appliances without receiving an incentive.

SO9. What would you have done with this [INSERT RESPONSE FROM SO6] if you had not participated in the Appliance Retirement program 2018? Would you have…? 2018 What Would Have Done With Appliances if Not Participated in ARet Other Full-size...

AI summary The question asks respondents what they would have done with their appliances if they had not participated in the Appliance Retirement program in 2018. The table shows that most respondents would have recycled or taken their appliances to the dump.

S1. What do you think happens to appliances after they are picked up by the program? What Happens to Appliances 2015 2016 2018 Sample Size 200 198 200 Appliance is properly recycled 74% 66% 66% Appliance is recycled 67% 54% 61% Hazardous m...

AI summary The table shows the outcomes of appliances after being picked up by the program from 2015 to 2018. Most appliances were either properly recycled or trashed, with some being sold for reuse or given to others. The data indicates a decline in proper recycling rates over time.

S6. What was the most important reason you were not more satisfied with the online booking portal? Reason for being Less Satisfied with Online Booking Portal 2018 Sample Size 5 Too difficult or long to book 3 Too many questions/asked for a...

AI summary The online booking portal was criticized for being too difficult or lengthy to use, with some users also finding it burdensome due to the number of questions asked. The Appliance Retirement Program received mixed feedback, with recommendations focusing on better advertising, a wider variety of accepted products, and improved scheduling and communication.

« Would have kept the unit » scenarios Proportions of: Yes = [FR1=2 + FR2a=2] No = [FR1=1] FR4. How would you have disposed of your appliance if the program had not been available? - 1. Sold it or given it to a private party - 2. Left it o...

AI summary This section presents survey responses regarding how participants would have disposed of appliances if a program had not been available. It categorizes responses into 'Transferred' and 'Disposed' based on the selected disposal method.

Refrigerator Unitary Savings This section presents the methodology and calculations used to determine the unitary savings of fullsized refrigerators retired through ARet in 2018. The calculations of the gross unitary savings are first desc...

AI summary This section outlines the methodology and calculations for determining the unitary savings of full-sized refrigerators retired through ARET in 2018, covering both gross and net unitary savings.

Manufacture-year Class Average Per-cubic-foot Annual Consumption (kWh/cu. ft) Proportion of Refrigerators in the 2018 Tracking Sheet 2002 and later 49.2 50% 1995-2001 41.1 17% 1994 and earlier 58.9 34% Average Annual Consumption 51.6 kWh/c...

AI summary The table presents average annual energy consumption for retired refrigerators categorized by their manufacture years, highlighting the energy efficiency differences between older and newer models.

Average Energy Consumption of Replacement Refrigerators The average annual energy consumption of replacement refrigerators was used to take into account the effects of the secondary market. To do so, refrigerators were divided into new and...

AI summary The average annual energy consumption of replacement refrigerators was analyzed, dividing them into new and used categories with high and standard efficiencies. Three energy consumption levels were assigned based on the Uniform Methods Project methodology, assuming new standard-efficiency refrigerators consume similar energy to high-efficiency ones.

Replacement Appliance Category High Efficiency Standard Efficiency New New - Efficient New - Standard Used New - Standard Used - Standard 6 New York Department of Public Service, New York Standard Approach for Estimating Energy Savings fro...

AI summary The table outlines categories of replacement appliances based on efficiency levels, distinguishing between new and used appliances under high and standard efficiency classifications. A citation is provided to a 2010 document from the New York Department of Public Service regarding energy savings estimation methods.

Replacement Refrigerator Category High Efficiency (kWh/year) Standard Efficiency (kWh/year) New 359 400 Used 400 937 The 2018 participant survey results were used to establish the types of refrigerators used to replace the retired units (n...

AI summary The document discusses the replacement of refrigerators, distinguishing between new and used units with varying energy efficiencies. Survey results from 2018 were used to determine the average annual energy consumption of replacement refrigerators, which was calculated as 378 kWh per year.

Table 4: Average Annual Consumption for Refrigerator Replacement Type of Replacement Annual Energy Consumption (kWh/year) Proportion New High-efficiency Refrigerator 359 81% Used High-efficiency Refrigerator 400 14% New Standard-efficiency...

AI summary Table 4 presents the average annual energy consumption for different types of refrigerator replacements, highlighting the energy efficiency differences between new and used high-efficiency and standard-efficiency refrigerators. The data shows that new high-efficiency refrigerators consume significantly less energy compared to used standard-efficiency models.

Part-use Factor Part-use factors 8 are applied to adjust the savings calculations to account for the fact that not all refrigerators are plugged in year-round. The secondary refrigerator in a principal residence or the primary refrigerator...

AI summary The document discusses the use of part-use factors to adjust savings calculations for refrigerators in the Appliance Retirement program. The 2018 survey data is used to determine how often refrigerators are in use, influencing the part-use factor applied. The overall part-use factor in 2018 was 0.82, similar to 2016. The use of non-recycled refrigerators is also considered in the calculation.

Table 6: Likely Use of Refrigerators and Corresponding Part-use Factors Use Prior to Recycling Likely Use If Not Recycled Part-use Factor Proportion Primary Kept (as a primary unit) 0.91 0% Kept (as a secondary unit) 0.52 31% Discarded 0.8...

AI summary Table 6 presents the likely use of refrigerators and corresponding part-use factors, with an overall part-use factor of 0.70. Using this factor, the annual energy consumption of retired and replacement refrigerators is calculated as 687 kWh and 265 kWh, respectively.

Table 7: Final Energy Consumption Values for Refrigerators Measured Consumption (kWh/year) Part-use Factor Final Consumption (kWh/year) Retired Refrigerator 982 0.70 687 Replacement Refrigerator 378 0.70 265 Net Unitary Savings

AI summary Table 7 presents the final energy consumption values for retired and replacement refrigerators, highlighting the energy savings achieved through appliance retirement. The retired refrigerator has a final consumption of 687 kWh/year, while the replacement model consumes 265 kWh/year, resulting in significant net unitary savings.

Free-ridership Free-ridership corresponds to the energy consumption of appliances that would have been disposed of in the absence of ARet. It does not include the consumption of those appliances that would have been transferred to other ow...

AI summary Free-ridership refers to energy consumption from appliances that would have been disposed of without the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program. The Evaluator surveyed participants to determine their disposal actions, such as selling, donating, or recycling, to assess free-ridership. A table summarizes these scenarios and identifies free-riders.

Table 8: Discarding Scenarios and Refrigerator Proportions Would Have Kept the Unit Proportion Discard Scenario Proportion Total Proportion Yes 41% 41% No Transferred 41% 24% 59% Disposed 59% 35% Secondary Market Impacts

AI summary Table 8 outlines scenarios for refrigerator discarding, showing proportions of units that would have been kept versus discarded. The table indicates that 41% of units would have been kept, while 59% were discarded. The secondary market impacts section suggests further analysis on how these discarding scenarios affect the market.

Scenario 1 Would-be acquirers would have found another appliance if they had not received a second-hand appliance. Consequently, the total number of appliances connected to the grid is unchanged by ARet. There are two possibilities in this...

AI summary Scenario 1 discusses the impact of appliance retirement (ARET) on the total number of appliances connected to the grid, considering two possibilities: another used appliance being purchased or a new standard-efficiency appliance being purchased due to reduced availability on the secondary market.

Scenario 2 Would-be acquirer in the secondary market would not have acquired another unit. The appliance is therefore used as a secondary unit by the acquirer who normally would not have sought the secondary unit. This means that there wou...

AI summary Scenario 2 discusses the secondary market impact of appliance acquisition, where a would-be acquirer purchases an appliance they otherwise would not have, leading to an additional appliance on the grid. No secondary market impact on energy consumption is removed from gross savings in this scenario. The table summarizes various scenarios and their energy impacts, using default values from the UMP.

Table 9: Proportions of Secondary Market Impacts for Refrigerators Would-be Acquirer Finds an Alternative Unit Proportion Alternative Type Proportion Second Market Impact Value Old Unit 50% Consumption value of retired appliances Yes 50% N...

AI summary Table 9 outlines the proportions of secondary market impacts for refrigerators, considering scenarios where a would-be acquirer finds an alternative unit. It differentiates between old and new units, their respective proportions, and associated consumption values. The table also includes a net unitary savings calculation.

Table 10 below presents the unitary savings value calculated for refrigerators retired through ARet. This unitary savings value was obtained by calculating a weighted average of all the scenarios and their corresponding savings. This resul...

AI summary Table 10 presents the unitary savings value of 389 kWh per unit for refrigerators retired through ARET, calculated as a weighted average of various scenarios and their corresponding savings.

Table 10: Net Savings per Refrigerator Would Have Kept % Discard Scenario % Would-be Acquirer Finds an % % Alternative % % Overall Ener Consun (kWh/ nption Savings the Unit Scenario , Alternative Unit туре туре Proportion Without ARet With...

AI summary Table 10 presents net savings per refrigerator based on different scenarios, including the percentage of units that would have been kept, discarded, or transferred, and the corresponding energy consumption and savings. The data indicates the impact of appliance retirement on energy savings.

Average Energy Consumption of Retired Freezers As with refrigerators, the Evaluator revised the annual energy consumption value of retired freezers using the data from the 2017 metering activity. The Evaluator also categorized the metered...

AI summary The Evaluator revised the annual energy consumption value of retired freezers using 2017 metering data and categorized freezers by manufacturing year based on energy efficiency regulations introduced in 1994 and 2001. The average annual per-cubic-foot energy consumption was calculated as 90.1 kWh.

Table 11: Average Metered Annual Consumption for Retired Refrigerators Manufacture-year Class Average Per-cubic-foot Annual Consumption (kWh/cu. ft) Proportion of Refrigerators in the 2018 Tracking Sheet 1995 and later 56.2 45% 1994 and ea...

AI summary Table 11 presents the average annual energy consumption of retired refrigerators in Nova Scotia, categorized by their manufacture year. The average annual consumption is calculated based on the size of the refrigerators and their proportion in the 2018 tracking sheet.

Average Energy Consumption of Replacement Freezers Three energy consumption levels are assigned to freezer replacement categories based on the same principles as discussed in the previous subsection on refrigerators. 10 U.S. Department of...

AI summary The document discusses the methodology used to determine the average energy consumption of replacement freezers, based on Canadian and U.S. energy efficiency standards. It calculates a revised standard-efficiency freezer consumption value of 321 kWh and a high-efficiency freezer value of 289 kWh, applying a 10% efficiency improvement for ENERGY STAR certification.

Table 12: Average Annual Energy Consumption by Replacement Freezer Category Replacement Freezer Category High Efficiency (kWh/year) Standard Efficiency (kWh/year) New 289 321 Used 321 818 Project No. 6194 41

AI summary Table 12 presents average annual energy consumption for new and used freezers categorized by efficiency levels, highlighting the energy savings associated with high-efficiency models.

13 Natural Resources Canada, Freezers - Energy Efficiency Regulations , http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/regulations-codesstandards/products/6941 (Last accessed January 9, 2019). As with refrigerators, the 2018 participant survey results were...

AI summary The 2018 participant survey results were used to determine the types of freezers used to replace retired units, leading to the establishment of an average annual energy consumption value of 300 kWh for replacement freezers.

Table 14: Calculation of Part-use Factors for Freezers Level of Use Proportion Part-use Factor Not in use 17% 0.00 Used part-time 23% 0.50 Used full-time 60% 1.00 Total 100% 0.72 As outlined in Table 15 below, the part-use factor for freez...

AI summary Table 14 outlines the part-use factors for freezers based on their level of use, with a total part-use factor of 0.72. This factor is used to calculate the average annual energy consumption for both retired and replacement freezers, resulting in 945 kWh and 216 kWh, respectively.

Table 15: Final Energy Consumption Values for Freezers Measured Consumption (kWh/year) Part-use Factor Final Consumption (kWh/year) Retired Freezers 1,312 0.72 945 Replacement Freezers 300 0.72 216

AI summary Table 15 presents final energy consumption values for retired and replacement freezers, showing measured consumption, part-use factor, and calculated final consumption in kWh/year.

Free-ridership Table 16 presents the different discarding scenarios and the proportion of participants who would have disposed of their freezers without ARet and who are therefore identified as free-riders.

AI summary Table 16 outlines various discarding scenarios and identifies free-riders as participants who would have disposed of their freezers without the Appliance Retirement (ARET) program.

Table 16: Discarding Scenarios and Proportions for Freezers Would Have Kept the Unit Proportion Discard Scenario Proportion Total Proportion Yes 31% 31% No 600/ Transferred 35% 24% No 69% Disposed 65% 45% Secondary Market Impacts

AI summary Table 16 outlines scenarios for freezer discarding, showing that 31% of units would have been kept, while 69% were discarded, with 35% transferred and 65% disposed. The secondary market impacts are discussed in the context of appliance retirement and efficiency programs.

The secondary market impacts were calculated in a manner similar to that used for refrigerators. Table 17 presents all the possible scenarios in which appliances would have been transferred to the secondary market and their corresponding e...

AI summary The secondary market impacts of appliances were calculated similarly to refrigerators, with Table 17 outlining various scenarios and their corresponding energy impacts.

Table 17: Proportions of Secondary Market Impacts for Freezers Would-be Acquirer Finds an Alternative Unit Proportion Alternative Type Proportion Second Market Impact Value Old Unit 50% Consumption value of retired appliances Yes 50% New U...

AI summary Table 17 presents the proportions of secondary market impacts for freezers, showing that 50% of would-be acquirers find an alternative unit, either an old unit or a new standard-efficiency unit, while the other 50% do not find an alternative, resulting in no secondary market impact.

Net Unitary Savings Calculation Table 18 below presents the unitary savings value calculated for freezers retired through ARet. This unitary savings value was obtained by calculating a weighted average of all the scenarios and their corres...

AI summary Table 18 presents the net unitary savings value of 450 kWh per unit for freezers retired through ARet, calculated as a weighted average of various scenarios and their corresponding savings.

Table 18: Net Savings per Freeze Would Have % Discard Scenario % Would-be Acquirer Finds an % Alternative % Overall Ener Consun (kWh/ nption Savings Kept the Unit Scenario Alternative Unit Туре Proportion Without ARet With ARet Net Reducti...

AI summary The table presents net savings per freeze related to room air conditioner unitary savings, showing the impact of appliance retirement (ARET) on energy consumption. It includes scenarios where units are kept, transferred, or disposed of, and compares energy consumption with and without ARET.

Average Consumption of Retired Room Air Conditioners The Evaluator reviewed the assumptions used by ENS for the calculation of the average energy consumption of replaced room air conditioners.

AI summary The Evaluator examined the assumptions made by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) in calculating the average energy consumption of retired room air conditioners.

SEER The 2018 ARet tracking sheet indicated that 96 percent of retired room air conditioners were manufactured after 1995. Therefore, the assumption that most air conditioners retired through ARet met the efficiency level of 8 (in effect s...

AI summary The 2018 ARet tracking sheet showed that 96% of retired room air conditioners were manufactured after 1995, supporting the assumption that most met the 1995 efficiency level of 8. To account for seasonal variations, the Evaluator used SEER instead of EER, calculating a SEER of 8.9. This led to an average annual energy consumption of 218 kWh for retired units.

Table 19: Discarding Scenarios and Proportions for Room Air-conditioners Would Have Kept the Unit Proportion Discard Scenario Proportion Total Proportion Yes 45% 45% No. Transferred 25% 14% No 55% Disposed 75% 41% Secondary Market Impacts

AI summary Table 19 outlines the discarding scenarios and proportions for room air-conditioners, showing that 45% of units would have been kept, while 55% were discarded, with 25% transferred to the secondary market and 75% disposed of. This data is used to analyze secondary market impacts.

Room air conditioner secondary market impacts were calculated in a manner similar to the calculations for refrigerators and freezers. Table 20 presents all the possible scenarios for room air conditioners that would have been transferred t...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of room air conditioner secondary market impacts, similar to those for refrigerators and freezers, with Table 20 presenting various scenarios and their corresponding energy impacts.

Table 20: Proportions of Secondary Market Impacts for Room Air Conditioners Would-be Acquirer Finds an Alternative Unit Proportion Alternative Type Proportion Secondary Market Impacts Value Old Unit 50% Consumption value of retired applian...

AI summary Table 20 outlines the proportions of secondary market impacts for room air conditioners, showing that 50% of would-be acquirers find an alternative unit, with 50% opting for a new unit and 50% for an old unit. The table also notes that the same assumptions apply to refrigerators and freezers.

Table 21: Net Savings per Room Air Conditioning Unit Would Have % Discard % Would-be Acquirer Finds an % Alternative % Overall Energy Consumption (kWh/year) Savings Kept the Unit Scenario Alternative Unit Type Proportion19 Without ARet Wit...

AI summary Table 21 presents net savings per room air conditioning unit under different scenarios, including keeping, transferring, or discarding units. It highlights energy consumption and savings associated with appliance retirement (ARET) initiatives. The weighted average energy consumption per unit is 115 kWh/year.

Average Energy Consumption of Small Appliances Retired The Evaluator used the same methodology as in the 2017 evaluation to establish the unitary savings of small appliances. This methodology involves using the average of the full-sized ap...

AI summary The Evaluator used the same methodology as in the 2017 evaluation to determine the unitary savings of small appliances by using the average of full-sized appliance metered annual per-cubic-foot consumption values to revise the small appliance annual energy consumption value.

Small Refrigerators For small refrigerators, the average consumption values of each manufacture-year class were assigned a weight based on their proportion accounted for by retired small refrigerators in the 2018 tracking sheet. As a resul...

AI summary The average consumption value for small refrigerators was calculated based on weights derived from retired units in the 2018 tracking sheet, resulting in an average of 50.0 kWh/cu. ft.

Manufacture-year Class Average per-cubic-foot Annual Consumption (kWh/cu. ft) Proportion of Small Refrigerators 2002 and later 49.2 73% 1995-2001 41.1 10% 1994 and earlier 58.9 17% Average Annual Consumption 50.0 kWh/cu. ft Table 22: Avera...

AI summary Table 22 provides data on the average annual consumption of retired small refrigerators, categorized by their manufacture-year class. The table shows that refrigerators manufactured in 2002 and later have the highest average consumption, followed by those manufactured in 1994 and earlier.

Small Freezers For small freezers, the average consumption values of each manufacture-year class were assigned a weight based on their proportion accounted for by the retired small freezers in the 2018 tracking sheet. As a result, the aver...

AI summary The average consumption value for small freezers was calculated based on the proportion of retired freezers from 2018, resulting in an average of 83.9 kWh per cubic foot.

Table 23: Average Annual Consumption of Retired Small Freezers Manufacture-year Class Average per-cubic-foot Annual Consumption (kWh/cu. ft) Proportion of Small Freezers 1995 and later 56.2 55% 1994 and earlier 117.8 45% Average Annual Con...

AI summary This table presents the average annual consumption of retired small freezers based on their manufacturing year. Freezers made in 1995 or later have an average consumption of 56.2 kWh/cu. ft, while those made before 1994 consume 117.8 kWh/cu. ft. The overall average is 83.9 kWh/cu. ft, with an average freezer size of eight cubic feet.

Table 25: Average Annual Consumption for Small Appliance Replacements Type of Replacement Annual Energy Consumption (kWh/year) Proportion Small Refrigerator Small Freezer New High Efficiency 169 178 80% Used High Efficiency 188 198 20% Ave...

AI summary Table 25 presents average annual energy consumption for small appliance replacements, specifically comparing new and used high efficiency refrigerators and freezers, with proportions indicating their contribution to total consumption.

The energy consumption values established for retired and replacement appliances were adjusted by multiplying the part-use factor by the measured consumption levels. The final annual energy consumption values are summarized in Table 27.

AI summary The energy consumption values for retired and replacement appliances were adjusted using a part-use factor multiplied by measured consumption levels, with the results summarized in Table 27.

Table 27: Final Energy Consumption Values for Small Appliances Measured Consumption (kWh/year) Part-use Factor Final Consumption (kWh/year) Retired Small Refrigerators 448 0.42 188 Replacement Small Refrigerators 173 0.42 73 Retired Small...

AI summary Table 27 presents final energy consumption values for retired and replacement small appliances, including refrigerators and freezers, based on measured consumption and part-use factors. The table calculates final consumption by applying part-use factors to measured values.

Table 28: Discarding Scenarios and Proportions of Small Appliances Would Have Kept the Unit Proportion Discard Scenario Proportion Total Proportion Yes 60% 60% No 40% Transferred 33% 13% INU Disposed 67% 27% Secondary Market Impacts

AI summary Table 28 presents scenarios and proportions of small appliance discarding, with 60% of units being kept, 13% transferred, and 27% disposed. The section also introduces a discussion on secondary market impacts.

The small appliance secondary market impacts were calculated in a manner similar to that used for refrigerators and freezers. Table 29 presents all the possible scenarios in which appliances would have been transferred to the secondary mar...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of energy impacts from small appliance transfers to the secondary market, using a method similar to that applied for refrigerators and freezers. Table 29 outlines various scenarios and their corresponding energy impacts.

Table 29: Proportions of Secondary Market Impacts for Small Appliances Would-be Acquirer Finds an Alternative Unit Proportion Alternative Type Proportion Secondary Market Impact Value Old Unit 50% Consumption value of retired appliances Ye...

AI summary Table 29 outlines the proportions of secondary market impacts for small appliances, showing that 50% of would-be acquirers find an alternative unit, either an old unit (50%) or a new unit (50%). The table also notes the consumption value of retired and new standard-efficiency appliances, with nil impact if no alternative is found.

APPENDIX VI ARET: 2018 RECOMMENDATIONS This appendix summarizes all the recommendations made by the Evaluator as part of the 2018 evaluation of the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program component. There were no incomplete 2017 recommendation...

AI summary This appendix outlines the 2018 evaluation recommendations for the Appliance Retirement (ARet) program component. The evaluation found no incomplete 2017 recommendations at the time of assessment.

- 99. (Refused) To replace an To replace a To replace an To replace an efficient L-E-D bulb CFL bulb incandescent bulb incandescent bulb Typically have wattages of 40 W, 60 W or 100 W Typically have wattages of 29 W, 43 W or 72 W P3b. [IF...

AI summary This text includes a table comparing different types of light bulbs and wattages, and a question regarding the installation of an L-E-D bulb. The context suggests a regulatory or program-related proceeding, possibly concerning energy efficiency or appliance standards.

Table 33: Wattage Calculations for the Early Replacement Baseline Purchased LED lamps Replaced Lamps LED Product Average Standard Efficient Incandescent Incandescent CFL Halogen LED Category Wattage Average Wattage % Average Wattage % Aver...

AI summary Table 33 provides wattage calculations for different types of LED lamps in an early replacement baseline scenario, establishing baseline wattages for LED A-type, R, BR, and decorative lamps, as well as other LED non-A-type lamps.

Replace On Burn-out Baseline: For the 41 percent of LED lamps that replaced burned out lamps, it was assumed that participants would have purchased lamps meeting the current Canadian federal energy efficiency regulation on general service...

AI summary The analysis assumes that 41% of LED lamps replacing burned-out lamps meet current Canadian federal energy efficiency regulations. The Evaluator used the wattage of the minimal efficiency lamp to calculate weighted average equivalent wattage for each lamp category, noting that the regulation does not cover LED non-A-type lamps.

Old Incandescent Lamps (W) ENERGY STAR Certified Lamp Light Output (Lumens) 40 450 60 800 75 1,100 100 1,600 150 2,600 For fixtures replacing halogen lamps, which is the case for one of the ten selected models, information on equivalent wa...

AI summary The table compares the wattage of old incandescent lamps with the lumens output of ENERGY STAR certified lamps. It also notes that for fixtures replacing halogen lamps, equivalent wattage information was available in manufacturer product descriptions.

For clothes washers using a domestic hot water (DHW) tank as heating source, the proportion of electrical DHW tanks in Nova Scotia was used to calculate the overall proportion of electrically heated water for both standard and efficient cl...

AI summary The proportion of electrical domestic hot water (DHW) tanks in Nova Scotia was used to calculate the overall proportion of electrically heated water for both standard and efficient clothes washers. This data, provided by NRCan, was used but has not yet been published.

67 As imposed by U.S. federal legislation. Incandescent Equivalent 2nd Tier EISA 2007. 68 As imposed by U.S. federal legislation. Incandescent Equivalent 2nd Tier EISA 2007.

AI summary The text references U.S. federal legislation, specifically EISA 2007, which imposes regulations on incandescent equivalent lighting products, highlighting the second tier of compliance.

SO4e. How many [INSERT RESPONSE IN SO4d] have you retired on your own? 2018 Number of Appliances Retired Outside of a Rebate or Assistance from Other Service, after Participating in EPI owners Mean Refrigerators 2 1.5 Freezers 1 1.0 Base:...

AI summary The document provides data on the number of appliances retired outside of rebate or assistance programs after participants engaged in the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. Refrigerators and freezers are highlighted, with averages provided for 2018.

Reflector Lamps A similar analysis was conducted for reflector lamps (GU10, PAR20 and PAR38 lamps), the results of which are outlined in Table 24. While reflector lamps are not impacted by current Canadian regulations, they will be affecte...

AI summary The analysis of reflector lamps (GU10, PAR20, and PAR38) shows that while they are not currently affected by Canadian regulations, they will be impacted by Amendment 17 starting in 2024. The baseline wattage for these lamps is increasing to meet a minimum efficiency level of 45 lumens/watt. As there is no intermediate technology between halogen and LED, it is recommended to cap the equivalent EUL of reflector lamps before 2024.

Table 26: Analysis of Key Factors in Program Planning Factor Results Market share of LEDs for BNI sector LED shipments targeted at the commercial and industrial sectors in Atlantic Canada attained 56 percent in 2017. Linear LED lamps make...

AI summary The table discusses the market share, price trends, and readiness of LED technology in the BNI sector. LEDs have achieved significant market penetration, with prices declining, and are expected to meet updated efficiency standards in Canada. No more efficient substitute technology is currently available.

Table 5: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of for Downlight Fixtures Typical Replaced Typical Efficient Halogen Incandescent and Incandescent Baseline Baseline 5 Years (2019-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline American Legislat...

AI summary Table 5 outlines the baseline evolution during the effective useful life of downlight fixtures, comparing typical replaced lamps with efficient alternatives. It includes wattage data for halogen incandescent, incandescent, and CFL equivalents, and references legislation in the context of baseline wattage and displaced wattage.

LED recessed downlight fixtures typically replace fixtures housing reflector lamps for which the baseline technology is halogen lamps. The EUL of LED recessed downlight fixtures is established at 11.3 years based on a rated life of 50,000...

AI summary The Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) of LED recessed downlight fixtures is calculated based on the replacement of halogen lamps with LED and CFL lamps. The EUL is initially 11.3 years, but changes in Canadian regulations are expected to shift the baseline from halogen to CFL lamps by 2024, resulting in a recalculated EUL of 7.4 years.

Table 6: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Reflector Lamps in Downlight Fixtures Typical Replaced Lamp Typical Efficient Halogen 6 Years (2 CFL Equivalent Baseline American Legislation 6 5.3 Years (2024-2029) (W) L...

AI summary Table 6 outlines the evolution of baseline energy usage for LED reflector lamps in downlight fixtures during their effective useful life, comparing halogen and CFL equivalents. It includes wattage data and legislative influences on baseline standards.

Table 10: Recommended Values for Linear LED Lamps Subcategory Baseline Wattage (W) HOU 4-foot Replacement Lamps 32 4,410 2-foot Replacement Lamps 17 4,410 U-bend Replacement Lamps 31 4,410 4-foot High Output Replacement Lamps 49 4,410 8 Du...

AI summary Table 10 outlines recommended wattage values for various linear LED lamps, including 4-foot, 2-foot, U-bend, and 4-foot high output replacement lamps, along with their Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) values. The data is sourced from Duke Energy Progress.

Subcategory Lumens (lm) Baseline Wattage (W) Hours of Use 220 25 4,410 LED Decorative (chandelier) 314 40 4,410 506 60 4,410 < 750 29 4,410 LED Omnidirectional ≥ 750 and < 1,050 43 4,410 (A-lamp and globe) ≥ 1,050 and < 1,490 53 4,410 ≥ 1,...

AI summary The table outlines baseline and efficient wattages for different types of LED lighting products, including decorative chandeliers and omnidirectional lamps, with corresponding lumens and hours of use. This data is relevant for energy efficiency programs and regulations.

Table 13: Recommended Values for LED Downlight Fixtures Subcategory Lumens Baseline Wattage (W) Annual Hours of Use ≥ 400 and < 1,000 45 4,410 LED Recessed ≥ 1,000 and < 3,000 90 4,410 ≥ 3,000 250 4,410 < 750 29 4,410 LED Ceiling Mount, LE...

AI summary Table 13 outlines recommended wattage values for various LED downlight fixtures based on lumens and subcategory. The data includes baseline wattage and annual hours of use, which may be relevant for energy efficiency programs and regulations.

Table 14: Recommended Wattages per Lumens Output for Outdoor Wall-mounted Area Luminaires Lumens Range MH Baseline Fixture Wattage (W) HPS Baseline Fixture Wattage (W) Weighted Average Baseline Wattage (W) Annual Hours of Use ≥ 300 and < 2...

AI summary Table 14 provides recommended wattages per lumens output for outdoor wall-mounted area luminaires, grouped into different lumens ranges. The data is based on baseline technologies from the Duke Energy Fixture Wattage table and assumes 4,380 annual hours of use for these fixtures.

Lumens Range of Efficient Luminaires Baseline Fixture Baseline Wattage (W) Annual Hours of Use ≥ 250 and < 1,000 Halogen 37 4,380 ≥ 1,000 and < 5,000 MH (70 W) 95 4,380 ≥ 5,000 and < 15,000 MH (250 W) 295 4,380 ≥ 15,000 and < 30,000 MH (25...

AI summary The table outlines the baseline fixtures and their corresponding wattages for different lumens ranges, providing a reference for efficient luminaires. This information is relevant for energy efficiency programs and regulations.

Table 20: Baseline Evolution During the Effective Useful Life of LED Non-recessed Fixtures Replaced Lamp Typical Efficient Halogen Incandescent Baseline 6 Years (2018-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline American Legislation 5.3 Years (2024-2029)...

AI summary Table 20 outlines the baseline evolution of LED non-recessed fixtures over their effective useful life, comparing displaced wattage from halogen incandescent and CFL equivalent baselines. It notes that for certain lighting measures, regulations are unlikely to change over the lifetime of these measures due to their already efficient baseline products.

Commercial Washing Machines Installed CEE Tier 2 commercial washing machine Quantity Installed: Manufacturer: Model number: Size [cubic feet]: Is the equipment used for commercial purpose? Is the equipment still used? If not, why and since...

AI summary The document contains a table requesting information about the installation and usage of CEE Tier 2 and Tier 3 commercial washing machines, including details such as quantity, manufacturer, model, size, usage, and operation frequency.

Non-recessed downlight fixtures Because non-recessed LED downlight fixtures replace fixtures using A-type lamps, the methodology for establishing their equivalent EUL is similar to what was described for A-type lamps. Once again, the equiv...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of equivalent EUL (Energy Use Life) for non-recessed LED downlight fixtures. It explains that the method is similar to A-type lamps, but with adjustments due to a longer rated life and a 2024 regulation change, which affects baseline calculations and results in an equivalent EUL of 6.3 years.

Table 5: Baseline Evolution during the Effective Useful Life of LED A-type Lamps for Downlight Fixtures Typical Replaced Typical Efficient Halogen Incandescent and Incandescent Baseline 1 year (2018) Halogen Incandescent Baseline 5 years (...

AI summary Table 5 outlines the baseline evolution of LED A-type lamps for downlight fixtures, comparing typical replaced lamps with efficient alternatives over different time periods, highlighting wattage differences and displaced wattage for various baseline scenarios.

LED recessed downlight fixtures typically replace fixtures housing reflector lamps, for which the baseline technology is halogen lamps. The EUL of LED recessed downlight fixtures has been established at 11.3 years based on a rated life of...

AI summary The Equivalent Useful Life (EUL) of LED recessed downlight fixtures is calculated as 7.4 years, considering a transition from 43 W halogen lamps to 20 W CFL equivalent lamps over a seven-year period. This calculation accounts for the change in baseline technology expected under Canadian regulations starting in 2024.

Table 6: Baseline Evolution during the Effective Useful Life of LED Reflector Lamps in Downlight Fixtures Typical Replaced Lamp Typical Efficient Lamp Halogen Baseline 6 years (2018-2023) CFL Equivalent Baseline American Legislation4 5.3 y...

AI summary Table 6 outlines the baseline evolution of LED reflector lamps in downlight fixtures over their effective useful life. It compares typical replaced lamps with efficient lamps, showing wattage differences and displaced wattage for halogen and CFL equivalent baselines under U.S. federal legislation.

Table 45: Energy Savings Associated with Standards for Fluorescent Lamps in the Nova Scotia Market 40 Table 46: Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios for Commercial and Industrial Lamps 41 Table 47: Adjusted Peak Demand-to-energy Ratios for General...

AI summary The text presents a series of tables and figures related to energy savings from fluorescent lamp standards in Nova Scotia, including peak demand-to-energy ratios, market size estimates, and savings values associated with the regulation of fluorescent lamp ballasts.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the 2018 demand-side management (DSM) impact evaluation of Codes & Standards (C&S). The 2018 evaluation was based on secondary data research and a number of interviews and exchanges wit...

AI summary This report evaluates the 2018 demand-side management (DSM) impact of Codes & Standards (C&S) using secondary data and interviews with industry associations, government representatives, and retailers.

3.1.2 Regulation Description Amendment 10 to the Regulations Amending the Energy Efficiency Regulations was developed and put into effect on January 1, 2012 to enable a phased-in introduction of lighting standards. The regulation was inten...

AI summary Amendments 10 and 12B to the Energy Efficiency Regulations were introduced in 2012 and 2014 to phase out incandescent lamps and promote energy-efficient lighting. Amendment 12B delayed the phase-out to allow more time for consumer education, technological advances, and addressing concerns about CFLs. The regulation aimed to improve lighting efficiency by 30% and align with American standards.

Traditional Incandescent Light Lamp Light Lamp New Standards Type of Light Lamp Effective Date Maximum Wattage Maximum Wattage Standard Spectrum (Lumens Range) Modified Spectrum (Lumens Range) Manufactured on or After 100 W 72 W 1,490 – 2,...

AI summary The table outlines the compliance schedules for general service light lamps with new standards, including wattage reductions and effective dates for different types of light lamps.

Product Class Projected Nova Scotia Market in 2018 (lamps) Actual Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2018 (lamps) 100 W 159,050 - 75 W 13,254 - 60 W 430,761 100,614 40 W 59,644 13,931 3.1.4 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Regulation

AI summary The table shows projected and actual shipments of various lamp products in Nova Scotia for 2018, highlighting the gap between projections and actual shipments for different wattage classes. The section discusses the portion of the market impacted by the regulation.

The difference between the projected 2018 market and actual shipments represents the impact achieved by the standard, as summarized in Table 7.

AI summary The difference between the projected 2018 market and actual shipments illustrates the impact of the standard, as detailed in Table 7.

Table 7: Estimate of the Portion of the Incandescent Lamp Market Impacted by the Regulation Product Class Percentage of Total Projected Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Regulation in 2018 Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the St...

AI summary Table 7 provides an estimate of the portion of the incandescent lamp market impacted by the regulation in 2018, including the percentage of total projected shipments affected and the number of lamps affected by the standard. The table covers different product classes such as 100 W, 75 W, 60 W, and 40 W lamps.

3.4.1 Product Description Residential clothes washers are common household appliances. They are classified in Canada according to size (standard over 45 L or compact under 45 L) and loading axis (top-loading or frontloading). According to...

AI summary Residential clothes washers are common household appliances in Canada, classified by size and loading axis. Approximately 90% are standard size, and top-loading types are more common. These appliances use electricity, oil, or natural gas for water heating, and their energy savings analysis considers the water heating source.

Table 26: Clothes Washer Market Size Estimates for Nova Scotia, 2018 Product Class Atlantic Market in 2018 Nova Scotia Market in 2018 Tier I - Front-loading 12,418 4,917 Tier II - Top-loading 42,276 16,741 Total 54,694 21,659 3.4.4 Portion...

AI summary Table 26 provides estimates of the clothes washer market size in Nova Scotia for 2018, including front-loading and top-loading models. Section 3.4.4 discusses the portion of the market impacted by the regulation.

The NRCan cost-benefit analysis report on the standards covered by Amendment 13 provided the noncompliance rate for Tier I and Tier II clothes washers in Canada prior to the application of the new MEPS. Since no province-specific statistic...

AI summary The NRCan cost-benefit analysis report on Amendment 13 provided noncompliance rates for Tier I and Tier II clothes washers in Canada, assuming Nova Scotia's rate is the same as the national rate. Table 27 estimates the market impact of the regulation on these washers.

Table 27: Estimate of the Portion of Clothes Washers Market Impacted by the Regulation Product Class Percentage of Total Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Regulation in 2018 Tier I - Front-loading 5% Tier II - Top-loading 54% 3.4.5...

AI summary Table 27 estimates the portion of the clothes washers market in Nova Scotia impacted by a regulation in 2018, showing 5% for Tier I front-loading washers and 54% for Tier II top-loading washers. The section also introduces 'Unitary Savings Values' as a topic for further discussion.

3.5.1 Product Description General service incandescent reflector lamps are used in residential track and pot lighting and are often used in retail store display lighting systems. The products regulated in Canada are of certain shapes with...

AI summary This section describes general service incandescent reflector lamps used in residential and retail lighting, specifying voltage, wattage, and exceptions to regulation in Canada.

Table 32: Incandescent Reflector Lamp Market Size Estimates for Nova Scotia, 2018 Product Class NRCan Estimates of Class Shipments in 2017 Projected Nova Scotia Market in 2018 (lamps) Actual Shipments to Nova Scotia in 2018 (lamps) Residen...

AI summary Table 32 provides estimates of incandescent reflector lamp market sizes in Nova Scotia for 2018, including projected and actual shipments for residential and commercial products. The data highlights discrepancies between estimates and actual shipments, indicating potential impacts from regulatory actions.

Table 33: Estimated Portion of the Incandescent Reflector Lamp Market Impacted by the Regulation61 Product Class Percentage of Total Projected Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Regulation in 2018 Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by...

AI summary Table 33 outlines the estimated portion of the incandescent reflector lamp market in Nova Scotia impacted by a regulation in 2018, detailing the percentage of shipments affected and the total number of units impacted for various product classes and uses.

Table 40: Schedules for Fluorescent Lamp Compliance with New Standards63 Lamp Type Correlated Colour Temperature (K) Minimum average efficacy (lm/W) Manufactured on or After ≤ 4,500 89 July 15, 2012 1,200 mm (48 in) medium bi-pin base, rap...

AI summary Table 40 outlines compliance schedules for fluorescent lamps with new efficiency standards, specifying minimum average efficacy requirements and effective dates for different lamp types and correlated colour temperatures.

3.6.4 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Regulation According to NRCan, a portion of each product class already met the requirements due to U.S. standards, and only the affected portion of the 2018 actual shipments represents the impact...

AI summary According to Natural Resources Canada, a portion of each product class already met the requirements due to U.S. standards, and only the affected portion of the 2018 actual shipments represents the impact achieved by the standard, as summarized in Table 42.

Table 45: Energy Savings Associated with Standards for Fluorescent Lamps in the Nova Scotia Market Product Class Shipments to Nova Scotia Affected by the Standard in 2018 (lamps) Annual Energy Savings (kWh/yr/lamp) Interactive Effects Fact...

AI summary Table 45 presents energy savings associated with fluorescent lamp standards in Nova Scotia. The table shows that only T12 lamps in residential and commercial/industrial sectors had non-zero shipments and energy savings, while other lamp types had zero shipments affected by the standard. Total energy savings in 2018 were 2.878 GWh.

3.7.4 Portion of the Market Impacted by the Regulation According to NRCan, a portion of each product class already met the requirements due to U.S. standards, and only the affected portion of the 2018 actual shipments represents the impact...

AI summary According to NRCan, a portion of each product class already met the requirements due to U.S. standards, and only the affected portion of the 2018 actual shipments represents the impact achieved by the standard, as summarized in Table 50.

Table 6: List of Individual Evaluations. DSM Portfolio Program Components 1 Appliance Retirement Program 2 Instant Savings 3 Home Energy Assessment 4 Green Heat 5 Residential Efficient Product Installation 6 New Home Construction 7 BNI Ene...

AI summary The Appliance Retirement Program offers incentives for removing old, energy-inefficient appliances and ensures their proper disposal and recycling. It also educates customers about the energy consumption of older appliances.

6. New Residential Program The New Residential Program includes New Home Construction and a Passive House pilot. There were 682 completions in 2018 in the New Home Construction Program including 7 in the Passive House pilot. The program is...

AI summary The New Residential Program in Nova Scotia promotes energy-efficient new home construction and a Passive House pilot. It uses HOT2000 simulations, inspections, and certifications (Energy Star, R-2000, Passive House). Evaluations by Econoler identified data issues and recommended improving savings verification methods, including addressing overestimation ratios and extending useful life calculations for energy savings.

12.Codes and Standards Energy savings and demand reduction impacts of Codes and Standards are evaluated by Econoler but are accounted outside the DSM Administrator's DSM portfolio. Savings from Codes and Standards do not overlap with savin...

AI summary Econoler evaluates energy savings from Codes and Standards outside Efficiency Nova Scotia's DSM portfolio. Federal regulations like Canada's Energy Efficiency Regulations and Nova Scotia's MEPS for street lights drive efficiency. The 2018 evaluation used secondary data from NRCan, AHAM Canada, and others. Econoler recommends excluding houses/small buildings and incandescent lamps from 2019 evaluations due to negligible impact and outdated baselines.

3.1.2 APPLIANCE RETIREMENT

AI summary Section 3.1.2 discusses appliance retirement programs under Nova Scotia's regulatory proceeding. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) and EfficiencyOne (E1), with topics focusing on appliance retirement policies and their implications for demand-side management (DSM) and integrated resource planning (IRP).

Assumptions When tracking savings and expenditures, ENS includes appliance replacements (which are delivered through the HomeWarming service) within the Appliance Retirement program component, however the low income participation is calcul...

AI summary ENS includes appliance replacements (via HomeWarming) in the Appliance Retirement program but calculates low-income participation differently. Replacements are exclusively low-income, while retirements assume low-income Nova Scotians participate at 10% the rate of the general population, per a local expert estimate.

Appliance Retirement • Incremental measure costs in Appliance Retirement reflect EfficiencyOne's costs to pick- up retired appliances and recycle them (via a contracted party). Incentive costs are modelled as the sum of the aforementioned...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's Appliance Retirement program models incremental measure costs as the sum of appliance pickup and recycling expenses plus participant incentives, resulting in modeled incentives exceeding measure costs. The ratio reflects this modeling approach, as outlined in E1's response to the Industrial Group.

Measure Lifetimes For measure lifetimes, a combination of resources was used, including manufacturer data, standard economic depreciation assumptions, NRCan, the ENERGY STAR® Website, industry trade organizations, various Technical Referen...

AI summary Measure lifetimes were determined using multiple sources including manufacturer data, NRCan, ENERGY STAR, U.S. DOE, industry reports, and studies. Data was reconciled through engineering judgment where discrepancies arose.

2.10 Appliance Recycling Appliance recycling measures need special treatment because of the unique characteristics of the base population. Unlike other base technologies, the used appliance stock available for recycling is constantly being...

AI summary Appliance recycling requires special consideration due to the dynamic nature of the appliance stock. Continuous refreshment of appliances, driven by efficiency improvements from codes and standards, results in a population of appliances that becomes more efficient over time, reducing annual energy savings. The rate of savings per unit declines despite stable appliance populations.

6.2.2 Ceiling or Attic Insulation The percent of homes with various levels of ceiling or attic insulation in terms of R‐value is shown in Figure 50. According to ENERGY STAR® standards, the proper level of insulation for the upper Northeas...

AI summary Figure 50 shows that 97% of homes in the upper Northeast have insufficient ceiling/attic insulation (R49–R60 per ENERGY STAR® standards). The data highlights a significant gap between current insulation levels and recommended standards.

6.2.3 Windows It should be noted, that due to the relatively small sample size of the on‐site surveys and wide margin of error, these results should be used in a qualitative manner. The majority of windows are single pane in 5 percent of h...

AI summary The analysis notes the limited sample size and wide margin of error in on-site window surveys, recommending qualitative interpretation. In Atlantic Canada, 5% of homes have single-pane windows, and 11% have Low-E windows. A citation to the ENERGY STAR® website is provided for insulation information.

7.8 BNI Refrigeration

AI summary Section 7.8 of the regulatory proceeding document focuses on BNI Refrigeration, though no further details or arguments are provided in the text. The section likely pertains to energy efficiency, refrigeration technologies, or related regulatory considerations under Nova Scotia's energy framework.

7.9 BNI Motors and Compressed Air

AI summary Section 7.9 discusses BNI Motors and Compressed Air within a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding. The context includes numerous acronyms related to energy efficiency, regulation, and organizations involved in energy management and policy.

7.10.2 Water Heater Capacity

AI summary Section 7.10.2 of the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding document addresses water heater capacity, likely involving energy efficiency and regulatory considerations. The context includes acronyms related to energy programs, regulatory bodies, and efficiency standards.

Figure 72 shows the freezer types by primary and secondary freezers. As the table illustrates, eighteen percent of freezers are Energy Star, all of which are primary freezers.

AI summary Figure 72 categorizes freezers into primary and secondary types, noting that 18% of freezers are Energy Star-rated, and all of these are primary freezers.

8.9 BNI Motors and Compressed Air

AI summary Section 8.9 discusses BNI Motors and Compressed Air, focusing on energy efficiency and regulatory considerations. Key entities include Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) and Nova Scotia Power (NSP), with topics related to demand-side management (DSM) and technical standards.

Motor/Fan/Pump Efficiency Conversion Table Where ever there is a motor efficiency value that is given in Nominal%, use th1s table to convert that percentage into a ''Standard" or "Premium'' efficiency label. If the percentage lies between...

AI summary A conversion table is provided to translate motor efficiency percentages (Nominal%) into 'Standard' or 'Premium' efficiency labels. If a percentage falls between table values, the motor is classified as 'High' efficiency. This is part of a Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding related to energy efficiency standards.

Form 20 Std = Standard Water Heater I = Instantaneous (Tankless) PS = Purchased Steam AHP = Heat Pump Water Heater - Air Source GHP = Heat Pump Water Heater - Ground Source PHW = Purchased Hot Water B = Boiler DK = Don't Know 254. Fuel typ...

AI summary The document contains a form with fields related to water heating systems, including fuel types, equipment details, and efficiency metrics. It appears to be a data collection tool for regulatory purposes.

Appliance Retirement Appliance retirement direct install costs were based on actual direct install costs for the program, adjusted for inflation in each year at a rate of 1.8% with an additional 5% increase in the first year to account for...

AI summary The document outlines adjustments to direct install costs for appliance retirement, including a 1.8% annual inflation rate and a 5% first-year increase due to U.S. tariffs. EfficiencyOne identified an error in applying inflation rates using 2017 instead of 2018 costs, leading to slightly higher estimates, with a corrected analysis provided in an attachment.

First Nations Home Energy Efficiency The costs for refrigerator, freezer, and dehumidifiers used a slightly different cost estimate than Appliance Retirement and did not escalate over time. Since refrigerator, freezer, and dehumidifier rep...

AI summary The document discusses the cost estimates for refrigerator, freezer, and dehumidifier replacement measures in the First Nations pilot program, noting that they are similar to those in the Appliance Retirement program. EfficiencyOne has included these measures in its assessment for the Integrated Resource (IR) response.

E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate (SBA) 1 refrigerator, freezer, and dehumidifier replacements in Appliance Retirement and First 2 Nations is a total of $4k over the 2020-2022 period. 3 4 There are six remaining First Nations measure...

AI summary The document outlines the costs associated with appliance replacements in First Nations communities under the Appliance Retirement and First Nations program. It notes that six measures, including clothes dryers and heat pump water heaters, have no historical costs and are estimated based on program manager assessments.

Appliance Replacements Appliance Retirement will place an increased focus on appliance replacements by offering a new turn-key service. Currently, Appliance Retirement replaces fridges, freezers and dehumidifiers for low-income qualified N...

AI summary Appliance Retirement expands appliance replacement services, including new appliances for low-income Nova Scotians via HomeWarming and Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency programs. ENS will offer appliance replacement packages under the DSM Resource Plan, involving removal of old appliances and installation of efficient replacements.

Program History Residential Efficient Product Rebates is a well-established program in Nova Scotia and has been operating as part of the ENS portfolio since 2010. Instant Savings on energyefficient products has been operating since 2009[10...

AI summary Residential Efficient Product Rebates and Appliance Retirement programs have evolved since 2009 under Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS). Instant Savings, initially focused on CFLs, shifted to LEDs and expanded rebate availability. Appliance Retirement expanded province-wide and introduced incentives for new appliance categories. Both programs adapted rebate structures and product eligibility over time to align with market changes and energy efficiency goals.

Measures Promoted - Assistance will be provided to retire the following old, inefficient products: - refrigerators; - freezers; and - window air conditioning. - Assistance will be provided to replace the following old, inefficient products...

AI summary The document outlines measures to retire inefficient appliances (refrigerators, freezers, air conditioners) and replace them with high-efficiency alternatives, including LED lighting, smart thermostats, and energy-efficient household devices. The focus is on promoting consumer products that reduce energy consumption through efficiency upgrades.

Program Delivery The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program uses both a self-serve and turn-key delivery approach to help residential customers make smart energy choices through the retirement and/or replacement of inefficient appli...

AI summary The document outlines three program delivery models under Nova Scotia's energy efficiency initiatives: self-serve/turn-key approaches for residential rebates, delivery agent models for appliance retirement, and retailer engagement strategies for instant savings. These methods aim to promote energy-efficient appliance adoption and retailer participation.

Marketing Strategy The marketing strategy for Appliance Retirement will focus on enhancing a customer's quality of life through non-energy benefits (convenient, hassle-free pick up and recycling) with the rebate promoted as a secondary mes...

AI summary The marketing strategy for Appliance Retirement emphasizes non-energy benefits (convenience, recycling) with rebates as a secondary message, using digital, social media, and out-of-home campaigns. Instant Savings aims to drive in-store purchases of energy-efficient products through point-of-purchase materials, media promotions, and cross-program outreach to reduce price barriers and improve home efficiency.

Domestic Hot Water Support In Nova Scotia, energy used to heat potable water accounts for approximately 16 percent of household energy use. EfficiencyOne estimates that of the approximately 400,000 households in Nova Scotia, 55 percent use...

AI summary In Nova Scotia, domestic hot water heating accounts for 16% of household energy use, with 55% of households relying on electricity. EfficiencyOne has achieved 8-10% residential energy savings through water heating measures. Enhancements to the Existing Residential program under the DSM Resource Plan aim to reduce electricity use for domestic water heating.

6 4.1.1 Overview 3 5 7 The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program provides residential customers access to financial incentives for consumer products through retail channels and to retire and/or replace old inefficient appliances. T...

AI summary The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program offers financial incentives for energy-efficient appliances through two components: Appliance Retirement (removing old appliances and providing replacements for low-income customers) and Instant Savings (point-of-sale rebates at retail stores). The program partners with retailers and uses in-store events to promote energy efficiency.

1. Modification of Baseline Definition EfficiencyOne will modify the requirements of the Custom Incentives New Construction service to redefine the baseline Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) system operation for a proposed V...

AI summary EfficiencyOne proposes modifying the baseline definition for VRF heat pump systems under the Custom Incentives New Construction program, using ASHRAE 90.1-2013 and NECB-2015 standards. Key metrics include EER 9.3, COP 3.2, and part-load performance curves from NECB 8.4.4.21-E, operating between -10°C and -18°C.

2.3 – Summary The jurisdictional scan aimed at answering the following question: How is this issue addressed in other relevant jurisdictions? In summary, the relevant jurisdictions use the modeling specifications in their building energy c...

AI summary The jurisdictional scan reviewed how other jurisdictions address the issue using NECB or ASHRAE 90.1 building energy codes. Both codes use packaged terminal heat pumps with electric auxiliary heating as the baseline for VRF systems, with ASHRAE 90.1 also setting minimum efficiency standards for VRF systems in prescriptive programs.

3.1.2.4 – Standard VRF System The standard version of the VRF heat pump system is an air-source VRF that reflects the prescriptive minimum efficiencies in ASHRAE 90.1-2013. The indoor units in each apartment use an electric resistance as a...

AI summary The standard VRF heat pump system is air-source and complies with ASHRAE 90.1-2013. It uses electric resistance heating in indoor units, heat-recovery ventilators (HRVs), gas-fired make-up air units for corridors, and gas-fired domestic hot water systems.

4.1.1 Overview The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program provides residential customers access to financial incentives for consumer products through retail channels and to retire and/or replace old inefficient appliances. The Resid...

AI summary The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program offers financial incentives for retiring inefficient appliances and purchasing energy-efficient products. It includes Appliance Retirement (removing old appliances and providing replacements for low-income customers) and Instant Savings (point-of-sale rebates via retailers). EfficiencyOne partners with retailers to promote energy efficiency through in-store events and product demonstrations.

Appliance Replacements Appliance Retirement will place an increased focus on appliance replacements by

AI summary Appliance Retirement will place an increased focus on appliance replacements, indicating a potential shift in strategy or policy related to replacing outdated appliances.

Program Delivery The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program uses both a self-serve and turn-key delivery approach to help residential customers make smart energy choices through the retirement and/or replacement of inefficient appli...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power (NSP) employs multiple delivery models for its energy efficiency programs. The Residential Efficient Product Rebates program uses self-serve and turn-key approaches. The Appliance Retirement program utilizes delivery agents for appliance management, while the Instant Savings program engages delivery agents to recruit retailers and provide training on energy-efficient products.

Marketing Strategy The marketing strategy for Appliance Retirement will focus on enhancing a customer's quality of life through non-energy benefits (convenient, hassle-free pick up and recycling) with the rebate promoted as a secondary mes...

AI summary The marketing strategy for Appliance Retirement emphasizes non-energy benefits and targeted advertising to increase appliance retirements. Instant Savings aims to drive customer engagement with energy-efficient products through in-store promotions and media campaigns. Both programs use digital, social media, and traditional channels to boost participation across Nova Scotia.