Q: What is your opinion of the other proposed revisions to the CEJC? A: I support the other revisions as proposed.
AI summary The respondent supports the other proposed revisions to the Cost Estimation and Justification Criteria (CEJC).
Request IR-148: - Please confirm, or explain, otherwise, that summing the amounts in Appendix B Less than $1M, the total budget for Trenton 5 is $5.4M. - a) Overall, how much is NS Power planning to spend on Trenton 5 in 2026, including ot...
AI summary The text requests clarification on NS Power's capital expenditure plans for Trenton 5, including budget figures, criticality ratings, and justification for low-risk investments in a unit nearing retirement. It also asks for total spending on Trenton 5 and the whole Trenton station in 2026, as well as expenditures in 2025.
ase explain the rating of 25 for the ECEI Synchronous Condensers. Please confirm, or explain, otherwise, that summing the amounts in Appendix B Less than $1M, the total budget for Trenton 5 is $5.4M. 1. Overall, how much is NS Power planni...
AI summary The text raises questions about NS Power's capital expenditures for Trenton 5, including the rationale for low-risk-rated projects, budget figures, and stakeholder engagement related to the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). It also references Appendix D of the CEJC document, which discusses scope changes and stakeholder discussions.
Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →