1 customers, and to the extent that they believe an 2 agreement is in their customers' best interests, then I 3 think the Board can attribute weight to that; as we've 4 discussed, it's ultimately up to the Board to determine 5 how much wei...
AI summary The discussion centers on the weight the Board should give to a Settlement Agreement reached before the Application was filed. The focus is on whether the timing of the Settlement Agreement affects its consideration, with the argument that the Board should consider the nature of the agreement rather than the timing.
narrative that would assist with our views, in terms of what our views on what that impact may be and what it may mean. I mean, I think going back to the discussion we had prior earlier this morning, Mr. Mahody, about the precarious nature...
AI summary The discussion centers on the potential impact of trimming the revenue requirement on credit metrics and credit ratings, with concerns raised about adverse effects on customers' best interests. The speaker references Morrison Park's evidence suggesting there may be room to trim the revenue requirement to maintain credit metrics, but expresses reservations about this approach.
1 there's some valuable aspects of it, and they talk about 2 the consequences of a downgrade, and those are dire; those 3 are very significant consequences. And so anything that 4 is moving us closer to that line, or keeping us in that 5 p...
AI summary The speaker expresses concern over the potential negative impact on credit metrics and customer interests if a proposed action is taken, emphasizing that it could lead to a downgrade and adverse financial consequences. They also indicate that they are not opposed to providing a narrative but are against the action due to its negative implications.