E-1Application
1 passage
2.2 Comments from the Industrial Group On page 1 of its letter of comment, the Industrial Group (the "IG") provides comments relating to the effects of quantifying NEBs on incentive levels, insofar as further customer benefits have been id...
AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) recommends explicitly quantifying Non-Energy Benefits (NEBs) to set appropriate incentives. EfficiencyOne clarifies their method already accounts for NEBs in customer research but focuses on quantifying them for the Total Resource Cost (TRC) test. CLEAResult's recommendations also consider Program Administrator Cost (PAC) and customer simple payback, with the Custom program under Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) incorporating NEBs since inception.
75686IG (E1) IR-1 to IR14
1 passage
Request IR-5: - At Attachment 1 (Page 14 of 27), E1 states that the "Custom Program is the sole ENS Program - that uses customer simple back [sic payback] as a metric to modify incentives". - (a) Why is the custom program the sole program...
AI summary The document questions why the Custom Program is the only ENS Program using customer simple payback as an incentive metric and whether this metric is relevant for other measures. It seeks clarification on the relevance of the metric across different programs.
Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →