Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Budgets And Targets" in M10473

Matter: E-ENS-R-22 EfficiencyOne 2023-2025 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan Application
15 passages 7 documents

Budgets And Targets across all matters →

E-32021 DSM Annual Progress Report 1 passage
2.1 Progress towards Three-Year Performance Targets p. pp. 6-8
2.1 Progress towards Three-Year Performance Targets - The 2021 savings results mark progress towards the achievement of E1's three-year NSUARB - approved Performance Targets. - 1 [Figure 1](#page-8-1) outlines the progress E1 has made in 2...

AI summary E1 reports progress toward achieving its three-year NSUARB-approved Performance Targets, with 2020 and 2021 savings results detailed in Figure 1. The data illustrates E1's performance relative to contractual targets, highlighting advancements in energy efficiency outcomes.

E-12E1(NSUARB) RIR-1 to RIR-41 3 passages
Section 376
r Plans Order, at 35; 2016-2018 Three-Year Plans Order, at 30; 2013-2015 Three-Year Plans Order, at 58; 2010-2012 Electric Three-Year Plans Order, at 125; 2010-2012 Gas Three-Year Energy Efficiency Plans, D.P.U. 09-110 through D.P.U. 09-11...

AI summary The Program Administrators propose a $57.6 million budget for statewide EM&V activities during the Three-Year Plans term, including specific research areas and study types to evaluate energy efficiency programs, with oversight from the Evaluation Management Committee.

Section 485
Three-Year Plans are significant and material. Notably, these Three-Year Plans are one of several statutory policy initiatives that the Department has overseen in recent years to further 138 Pursuant to Guidelines § 3.8.2(c), a Program Adm...

AI summary The text discusses budgeting procedures for Program Administrators under the Three-Year Plans, allowing a 10% overspend without prior approval but requiring review by the Council and Department for larger budget changes. The process includes submitting justification and supporting documentation if the Council opposes the change.

Section 505
ressly charged with reviewing the reasonableness of the budget and expenditures, and may modify the budget. St. 1980, c. 465 § 7(b). The Program Administrators must include a description of the activities that support the requested budget....

AI summary The Department of Energy and Resources (DOER) is reviewing the reasonableness of the Residential Conservation Standards (RCS) budgets proposed by Program Administrators. It approves most of the budgets but notes that the portion allocated to home energy scorecards lacks supporting proposals and documentation, raising concerns about the justification for these expenditures.

E-20Direct Evidence of Theodore Love, on behalf of CA 1 passage
11 Q. HOW WILL EFFICIENCYONE RAMP UP TO MEET THESE TARGETS? p. p. 8
11 Q. HOW WILL EFFICIENCYONE RAMP UP TO MEET THESE TARGETS? 12 A. E1 directly addresses this question in their response to CA IR-01 (Exh. TML-2), where 13 they describe how projections assume no periods of isolation, as during the COVID-19...

AI summary E1 plans to ramp up by increasing marketing, expanding measures, and updating incentives, but faces challenges in scaling up quickly, especially with workforce shortages in retrofit programs. They aim to reach $8 million annually for the Single-Family Homes Program starting in 2022 using their HomeWarming experience.

E-25Evidence of A. Napoleon and K. Takahashi, on behalf of BCC Synapse 6 passages
14 Q. Please describe E1's proposed budget for the Settlement Plan. p. p. 10
14 Q. Please describe E1's proposed budget for the Settlement Plan. 15 A. As shown in [Table 5,](#page-11-0) E1's proposed budget for the Preferred Plan is $173 million 16 over the three years of the plan. Of that budget, half is dedicated...

AI summary E1's proposed budget for the Settlement Plan is $173 million over three years, with half allocated to Business, Non-Profit, and Institutional (BNI) programs and half to residential programs, as outlined in E1 Evidence (p. 13).

1 Table 5. Proposed budget for the Settlement Plan p. pp. 10-11
1 Table 5. Proposed budget for the Settlement Plan Year Budget ($ million) 2023 53.1 2024 57.5 2025 62.5 Total 173.0 2

AI summary Table 5 outlines the proposed budget for the Settlement Plan from 2023 to 2025, totaling $173 million.

3 Q. How does this budget compare to the cost of the Preferred Plan from the 4 Round 3 Modeling? p. p. 11
3 Q. How does this budget compare to the cost of the Preferred Plan from the 4 Round 3 Modeling? 5 A. We show the budget for the Settlement Plan and the Round 3 Modeling Preferred 6 Plan in [Table 6,](#page-11-1) below.

AI summary The response directs to Table 6 for a comparison between the Settlement Plan budget and the Round 3 Modeling Preferred Plan's cost, indicating the analysis focuses on budgetary alignment with modeled preferred resource planning scenarios.

9 Q. How does this budget compare to the savings of the prior three-year plan? p. p. 11
9 Q. How does this budget compare to the savings of the prior three-year plan? 10 A. We show the budget for the Settlement Plan and the 2020–2022 Plan in [Table 7,](#page-11-2) 11 below.

AI summary The response directs to Table 7 for comparing the Settlement Plan's budget with the 2020–2022 Plan's savings, highlighting budgetary allocations across two distinct planning periods.

12 Table 7. Settlement Plan vs. 2020–2022 Plan budget p. p. 11
12 Table 7. Settlement Plan vs. 2020–2022 Plan budget Budget ($ million) Settlement Plan (2023-2025) 173.0 Prior Three-Year Plan (2020-2022) 110 % Change 57% 13

AI summary Table 7 compares the Settlement Plan (2023–2025) budget of $173 million to the Prior Three-Year Plan (2020–2022) budget of $110 million, showing a 57% increase. This highlights significant budgetary differences between the two plans.

Q. What do you recommend? p. p. 30
Q. What do you recommend? A. The Board should require E1 to develop a framework, as described above, as a condition of approving the proposed budget for development and research. - Q. Does this conclude your evidence at this time?

AI summary The Board is recommended to require E1 to develop a framework as a condition for approving the proposed budget for development and research.

E-25-(i)Resume of A. Napoleon 1 passage
PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE p. p. 0
d cash flow, expense, and income data; created budgets; devised and implemented procedures to increase administrative efficiency; implemented new accounting system with minimal disruption to workflow. As Project Administrator, coordinated...

AI summary The text outlines professional responsibilities in financial and project management, including budget creation, administrative efficiency improvements, accounting system implementation, software feature coordination, user manual development, and technical proposal editing. No specific claims or regulatory arguments are presented.

E-25-(ii)Resume of K. Takahashi 1 passage
PUBLICATIONS p. p. 0
Efficiency and Building Electrification Portfolios Through 2025: A Brief on the New York Public Service Commission's Recent Order. Synapse Energy Economics for the Natural Resources Defense Council. Hopkins, A. S., K. Takahashi, Nadel, S....

AI summary The document lists publications on energy efficiency, building electrification, and related studies by Synapse Energy Economics for organizations like NRDC and Bloom Energy. Topics include heat pump technology, low-income programs, energy efficiency budgets, and stakeholder collaboration in New York and Vermont. Case 18-M-0084 is cited regarding energy efficiency initiatives.

E-30E1 Compliance Filing 2023-2025 with Appendix A-D FINAL 2 passages
Section 7 p. p. 4
Table 2 below presents investment budgets and targets for the 2023-2025 portfolio as related to the 4 spending levels contained in the Settlement Plan and has been updated to reflect the removal of non- 5 energy impacts in cost effectivene...

AI summary The text discusses investment budgets and targets for the 2023-2025 portfolio, updated to reflect the removal of non-energy impacts in cost effectiveness testing results as directed by the NSUARB.

Preamble p. p. 4
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 25 Currency is expressed in nominal dollars. Currency in the total row is a straight sum of 3 years of nominal values. Columns may not add correctly, due to rounding. Annual avoided costs of energy...

AI summary The document discusses avoided costs and benefits of energy efficiency (EE) and demand response (DR) programs, using data from NS Power's 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and 2021 updates. It outlines investment budgets and targets for 2023-2025, reflecting changes in cost-effectiveness testing as directed by the NSUARB.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →