Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Budgets And Targets" in M12550

Matter: To obtain a cost reasonableness review of NS Power - CI C0051815 – $5,959,515 - RTU Replacements Program – Phase 6, as outlined in Section 2.1 of the ACE 2025 decision (M12012)
3 passages 3 documents

Budgets And Targets across all matters →

N-2NSPI (Midgard) RIR 1 to 14 - Redacted 1 passage
NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 86
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 (a) Please clarify whether overtime has been assumed or budgeted for any other activities 2 or job titles involved in the Phase 6 RTU installations. 3 4 (i) If so, identify where this overtime is reflected in the Phase 6...

AI summary The document requests clarification on whether overtime has been assumed or budgeted for any activities or job titles involved in Phase 6 RTU installations and asks for a completed table showing regular and overtime hours per RTU for both Phase 1 and Phase 6.

N-4Midgard (CA) RIR 1 to 9 - Redacted 1 passage
Preamble p. p. 6
- Reference : With respect to Midgard's discussion of the contingency amounts and budget (p. 19, - 25-27): - a) Please provide Midgard's opinion regarding whether NS Power's 10% contingency budget is consistent with NS Power's non-binding...

AI summary The text requests Midgard's opinion on NS Power's contingency budget in relation to the Board's 2020 ACE Plan Decision, including whether the 10% contingency is consistent with non-binding guidelines, potential weaknesses in the guidelines, and whether NS Power's application of the guidelines is appropriate. It also references prior statements about transmission line replacement projects and asks about the applicability of those statements to RTU replacement projects.

101123CA (Midgard) IR 1 to 9 - PDF 1 passage
23 Request IR-5:
23 Request IR-5: 24 With respect to Midgard's discussion of the contingency amounts and budget (p. 19, 25-27): - 25 (a) Please provide Midgard's opinion regarding whether NS Power's 10% contingency budget 26 is consistent with NS Power's n...

AI summary The request asks Midgard to evaluate NS Power's 10% contingency budget in light of the Board's 2020 ACE Plan Decision and NS Power's non-binding contingency guidelines. It also seeks opinions on potential weaknesses in the guidelines, NS Power's application of them, and whether risk register documentation is complete.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →