Topic:"Cap And Trade" in M10473

9 Q. IS THE VIEW INCLUDING THE COST OF CARBON ("WITH 10 CARBON") THE MOST APPROPRIATE? 11 A. EfficiencyOne calculated the TRC test using avoided costs with and 12 without the avoided environmental compliance cost of carbon. In Matter M0860...

AI summary The response discusses the inclusion of carbon costs in the TRC test, referencing the 2019 DSM Resource Plan and the 2017 Environment Act amendments that established Nova Scotia Power's participation in a Cap-and-Trade Program with a carbon price floor of $22.92 in 2022.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 vii) More than 50% of the electricity supply is from out-of-state with the largest share 2 t...

AI summary The document discusses energy efficiency funding models in Vermont and Massachusetts, highlighting that these programs are not fully funded by ratepayers. Vermont sources EEU funding from the Energy Efficiency Charge, the Forward Capacity Market, and cap-and-trade initiatives. Massachusetts also uses a mix of ratepayer funds and state participation in markets for its efficiency programs.

between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Massachusetts’ utilities derive funding for energy efficiency programming from several 2 sou...

AI summary The document outlines funding sources for energy efficiency programs in Massachusetts and Maine, including ratepayer contributions, cap-and-trade revenues, and settlement funds. It references the System Benefits Charge, RGGI, and other mechanisms used to finance energy efficiency initiatives.

ities between E1 and NS Power (2023-2025 DSM Plan) E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (NSUARB) Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 [Evidence] 2 Request IR-23: 3 4 Page 43 of 65 of the Application: please explain how t...

AI summary E1 explains that the 2023-2025 DSM Plan includes avoided carbon costs, aligned with provincial and federal legislative initiatives. These costs are based on the Nova Scotia Cap and Trade market value, and are considered benefits to ratepayers in the benefit-cost analysis.

lectric and gas IOUs. Over the first five years (2020-2025) targets translate to roughly 1.6% gross electric savings and 0.6% gross gas savings, including codes & standards supportive efforts (link). The most recent budgets for energy effi...

AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs administered by investor-owned utilities (IOUs) and publicly-owned utilities (POUs) in California, with oversight by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). Programs are funded through public benefits, on-bill financing, and AB 32 cap and trade funds. Targets for energy savings are outlined for 2020-2025.

stablishes program funding, energy savings targets, and household treatment/participation goals for each utility through a Decision. Cost-Effectiveness Rules for Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs Currently California applies the Energy...

AI summary The text discusses the coordination of low-income energy efficiency programs in California, including the use of cost-effectiveness tests, funding from AB 32 cap-and-trade revenues, and collaboration between utilities and the California Department of Community Services & Development. It highlights the integration of programs and cost-sharing mechanisms to improve energy savings and reduce GHG emissions.

uld increase each year. California will need a second phase of GHG standards, the Phase 2 GHG standards, in order to offset that projected VMT growth and keep heavy-duty truck CO2 emissions declining. In 2018, CARB adopted the Innovative C...

AI summary California needs to implement Phase 2 GHG standards to offset projected increases in vehicle miles traveled and reduce heavy-duty truck emissions. In 2018, CARB introduced the Innovative Clean Transit Regulation to transition public transit to zero-emission buses. In 2019, SB 210 directed CARB to develop a more comprehensive Heavy-Duty Inspection and Maintenance Program to ensure emissions control systems function properly over time.

icles, heavy?duty vehicles, and off?road equipment. This will ensure that once-deployed, zero?emission technologies are able to meet the reliability and performance expectations for California fleets. Last Reviewed: July 2020 ","Transporta...

AI summary The text discusses California's legislative efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions through transportation and land use integration, including AB32, SB375, and other bills that streamline environmental reviews and promote sustainable development practices.

r transportation impacts assessment. SB 628 (2014) authorized local governments to establish financing districts for capital projects that include brownfield, transit priority, affordable housing etc. SB 1 (2017) included over $800 million...

AI summary The text outlines various legislative and policy initiatives in California aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting sustainable development. Key measures include SB 628 (2014), SB 1 (2017), AB 32 (2006), SB 32 (2016), and SB 743 (2013), which focus on transportation impacts, financing districts, sustainable communities, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT) reduction targets.

allocates funding to a number of initiatives that can help curb VMT, like pedestrian and bicycle lane creation, increasing access to public transit, and boosting non-vehicle mobility across the State. The Land Use 2025 Report recommends an...

AI summary The document discusses initiatives in Rhode Island aimed at reducing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) through infrastructure improvements and public transportation. It highlights the Land Use 2025 Report, the Complete Streets policy, and participation in the Transportation Climate Initiative. The state lacks specific programs to incentivize low-income housing near transit but uses proximity to transit in allocating federal credits. Funding for public transit is outlined in the State Transportation Improvement Plan.

gfully support EVSE deployment and utilization within underserved areas as well as ensure benefits flow to those areas even if direct use is not occurring. Equity in transportation electrification Washington state's HEAL Act (SB 5141) will...

AI summary Washington state's HEAL Act (SB 5141) and other legislative measures require equitable investment in EVSE deployment, ensuring underserved communities benefit. Additional funding opportunities, such as green capital grants and incentives for charging infrastructure, were introduced in recent legislative sessions.