HomeCapacity CostsM03669Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Capacity Costs" in M03669

Matter: E-ENSC-R-10 - Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation - Electricity Demand Side Management Plan for 2012A request by Efficiency Nova Scotia for approval of a $43.7 million Demand Side Management plan for the 2012 operating year.  (Also see Matter Nos. M04538 and M04539)
4 passages 4 documents

Capacity Costs across all matters →

E-6ENSC (EAC) IR-1 to IR-43 (Revised April 6, 2011) 3/29/2011 1 passage
Context for Responses p. p. 253
NPB Topic PPA – Renewables Suggestions/Comments Use 28-30% for on-shore wind and reduce off-shore wind from 38%. Response NSPI is satisfied that the on-shore wind capacity factor of 32% and the off-shore capacity factor of 38% are reasonab...

AI summary The NPB responds to suggestions regarding the use of capacity factors for on-shore and off-shore wind in PPA renewals, and discusses the inclusion of new technology impacts in the Strategist model. It notes that the model accounts for shutdown times and parasitic power penalties, and acknowledges the speculative nature of capital costs for nascent technologies like carbon capture.

E-10Evidence of George Foote on behalf of CA 4/8/2011 1 passage
2012 DSM PLAN TARGETS AND SPENDING
2012 DSM PLAN TARGETS AND SPENDING - Q. Please summarize your conclusions and recommendations with regard to the proposed - budget, energy savings targets and programs for DSM for the year 2012. - A. While somewhat ambitious, the proposed...

AI summary The 2012 DSM Plan's $43.7M budget is deemed ambitious but aligned with historical ratepayer benefits. Concerns include rising cost-per-MW savings ($352 vs. $264 in 2011) and the need for ENSC to justify increased targets due to capacity/emission constraints. The 2009 Integrated Resource Plan's targets are suggested as a guide, while challenges in integrating multi-fuel DSM programs are highlighted.

IR-1 to IR-31 issued by Mel Whalen, Multeese Consulting Inc. (Board Counsel Consultant)06607 3/17/2011 1 passage
Request IR-5 With respect to Figure 5.1, a) If the annual avoided energy and avoided capacity costs used in the development of the TRC's and PAC's are different from those used to assess the 2011 DSM Plan, Please provide them. Please provide the date of the most recent update. Please confirm that the avoided costs currently being used were derived using the same methodology as was used to develop the avoided costs for the 2011 DSM programs. If not, please provide the new derivation. b) Please confirm that avoided costs are being applied in the same manner as in 2011. c) Please provide the derivation of the TRC and PAC results for two of the measures in the Efficient Products program that have different life expectancies. Request IR-6 With respect to Figure 5.1, Note e, please provide the derivation of the "historic savings" of 10 Gwh associated with the adoption of Codes and Standards. Request IR-7 With respect to page 15, line 17, please provide the basis for concluding that the industrial projects "were not included in the 2009 IRP Update" and reconcile it to the statement in Note 13 that "All DSM is assumed to be included in the projection used in the 2009 IRP". Request IR-8 With respect to page 15, lines 19 - 23, a) Please provide the "preliminary investigation" provided to ENSC by a third-party specialist. b) Please provide the qualifications of the third-party specialist to complete this work. Request IR-9 With respect to page 16, line 25, please provide the basis on which ENSC concludes that
Request IR-5 With respect to Figure 5.1, a) If the annual avoided energy and avoided capacity costs used in the development of the TRC's and PAC's are different from those used to assess the 2011 DSM Plan, Please provide them. Please provi...

AI summary The document contains regulatory requests (IR-5 to IR-10) seeking clarifications on avoided costs methodology, historical savings derivation, IRP inclusion of industrial projects, third-party investigations, and load forecast assumptions. Key topics include demand-side management (DSM), integrated resource planning (IRP), forecasting methodologies, and evidence requirements.

06934EAC Final Submission 5/13/2011 1 passage
Rate Impacts p. pp. 14-15
al years. And it should look at participants and nonparticipants, because that gives an indication of the people who 1 receive the direct benefit versus those who don"t. THE CHAIR: Is context important? In other words, other pressures on r...

AI summary The discussion highlights concerns about rate impacts from renewable generation costs, feed-in tariffs, and energy efficiency expenditures. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive analysis of long-term rate impacts, public perception challenges, and revisiting the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to determine optimal energy efficiency investment levels.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →