HomeCapacity CostsM08604Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Capacity Costs" in M08604

Matter: E-ENS-R-18 - EfficiencyOne - 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Plan Application, 2017 Annual Progress Report  and 2017 Evaluation Reports
7 passages 5 documents

Capacity Costs across all matters →

E-4-(i)2019 Plan RBIA Model - Excel Spreadsheet (Electonic Filing Only) 1 passage
Attribution
Attribution Unnamed: 0 Unnamed: 1 Unnamed: 2 Unnamed: 3 Unnamed: 4 Unnamed: 5 Unnamed: 6 Unnamed: 7 Unnamed: 8 Unnamed: 9 Unnamed: 10 Unnamed: 11 Unnamed: 12 Unnamed: 13 Unnamed: 14 Unnamed: 15 Unnamed: 16 Unnamed: 17 Unnamed: 18 Unnamed:...

AI summary The table presents average generation capacity costs avoided through Demand-Side Management (DSM) from 2011 to 2014, based on the 2009 IRP refresh, and from 2015 to 2040, based on the 2014 IRP, Base DSM scenario. The value provided is $195,354.6 per MW.

E-7NSPI (SBA) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-5 - Redacted 1 passage
Section 2
and 2017 Evaluation Reports (NSUARB M08604) NSPI Responses to SBA Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-1: 2 3 Regarding the energy and demand savings target for 2019, 4 5 (a) Does NSP agree with the overall targets of energy...

AI summary NSPI agrees with the 2019 DSM Plan's energy and demand savings targets (127.2 GWh and 20.2 MW) but notes that unmet targets could increase short-term costs for customers due to fixed cost recovery shifts. Long-term, reduced usage may lower overall costs if broadly adopted, though future demand savings would be needed to avoid peaking generators.

E-11E1 (Synapse) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-22 3 passages
Section 22
Avoided Avoided Year Capacity Costs Energy Costs $/kW $/MWh 2015 0 64 2016 0 60 2017 0 58 2018 0 55 2019 418 57 2020 196 60 2021 179 62 2022 190 84 2023 207 85 2024 201 86 2025 215 87 2026 202 89 2027 198 93 2028 195 98 2029 195 102 2030 1...

AI summary The table presents capacity and energy costs from 2015 to 2035, showing avoided capacity costs until 2019, followed by fluctuating values, while energy costs steadily increase annually. This data reflects long-term trends in cost projections for energy and capacity.

Section 360
E1 (Synapse) IR-14 Page 1 of 5 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 • Better intelligence relating to demand reduction and demand re...

AI summary The text discusses trends in capacity-related avoided costs, noting a shift from zero avoided costs for capacity between 2015-2018 to approximately $200 per kW in 2019. The Net Present Value of avoided capacity costs increased significantly from $930 in 2015 to $1,710 in 2019, highlighting improved value for demand reduction activities.

Section 363
Avoided Avoided Year Capacity Costs Energy Costs $/kW $/MWh 2015 0 64 2016 0 60 2017 0 58 2018 0 55 2019 418 57 2020 196 60 2021 179 62 2022 190 84 2023 207 85 2024 201 86 2025 215 87 2026 202 89 2027 198 93 2028 195 98 2029 195 102 2030 1...

AI summary The document presents a table outlining avoided capacity costs and energy costs from 2015 to 2034, showing a gradual increase in both metrics over time with significant jumps starting in 2019. This data may be used to analyze cost trends and planning for future energy needs.

E-16EfficiencyOne - Reply Submission 1 passage
Section 1
EfficiencyOne M08604 IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380, as amended. - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Acti...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's reply submissions discuss demand reduction pilots, including growth in peak demand, increased avoided capacity costs, low-cost investments with long-term savings, and AMI technology benefits. It also addresses an affordable multi-family housing pilot under the 2019 DSM Plan.

E-17NSPI - NSPI Reply Submission 1 passage
Section 3
in the next contract period. The scope of this proceeding is for the approval of the 2019 DSM Plan. A new potential study is required to assess the availability of cost-effective DSM going forward. The CA provided comments on the spending...

AI summary The proceeding seeks approval of the 2019 DSM Plan, with the CA highlighting opportunity costs of the demand reduction pilot. E1 and NS Power assert the pilot will yield real savings and inform future DSM strategies. Synapse recommends prioritizing capacity savings through demand reduction pilots, subject to stakeholder review.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →