Topic:"Capacity Costs" in M12588

Active Submissions Total A - Technical Evaluation A-1 - Adherence to RFP requirements A-2 - Ongoing support availability and service levels A-3 - Speed and efficiency of implementation (or project) plan, availability, and delivery the indu...

AI summary The text outlines the structure of an evaluation matrix for submissions, focusing on technical evaluation criteria such as adherence to RFP requirements, ongoing support, implementation speed, and industry expertise. It also includes sections related to corporate risk, including cybersecurity, insurance, and third-party attestation.

1 Request IR-3: 18 been appended as Attachment 1 for ease of reference. 19 20 (e) a Board directive to file by November 7th The AAR application has of each year for the 21 following year. For the 2027 test year, the AAR application would b...

AI summary The text discusses the filing of an AAR application by NS Power, referencing the anticipated 2027 test year and the uncertainty surrounding the implementation costs of the IESO-NS. It also notes that the 2026 AAR filing did not include recovery for certain deferred amounts or capital and financing costs.

Date Filed: March 3, 2026 NSPI (REI) IR-13 Page 3 of 3 1 Request IR-14: D.27 Business Process & Procedure Development Team has finalized process and procedure documentation from a Role Based perspective. Business Leads have all signed off...

AI summary The document outlines several tasks related to the final stages of a project, including the completion of business process documentation, technical development, and testing. These tasks are currently at various stages of completion, with some already finalized and others not yet started.

rements (Phase 2) to meet [Renewall's] expected commercial operation date of November 2024, their expected customer volume, and the potential for additional [licensed retail suppliers] in the market." [34] In response to CA IR-4 [Exhibit N...

AI summary NS Power engaged with Renewall to address project requirements for commercial operation in 2024, including scope changes related to the Fuel Adjustment Mechanism, billing systems, and licensed retail suppliers. NS Power also noted that costs from a recent Board decision are not included in the current application but will be addressed through a change request process if they affect the project.

3.2.5 Scalability and Future Market Costs [81] Renewall expressed concern that the project included costs for potential future requirements if the renewable to retail market expands, rather than being limited to the immediate market develo...

AI summary Renewall raised concerns about NS Power including scalability costs for future renewable to retail market expansion in its project, arguing that no specific evidence was provided to support these claims. Renewall requested a 'Scalability Costing Protocol' to ensure it is not held responsible for future market entrant costs. NS Power countered that its work was limited to initial operations and did not expand system capacity.

a) Reporting and Business Intelligence Development Costs NSPI states that its reporting tools are not, in themselves, insufficient, but that "the current reporting catalog needs to be enhanced to accommodate the anticipated transactional r...

AI summary NSPI argues that its current reporting tools are insufficient for new tariffs and settlement processes, requiring enhancements. REI acknowledges the need but criticizes the lack of defined outputs and cost alternatives. NSPI plans to deliver encrypted files monthly via SFTP. REI recommends deferring non-essential reporting costs.

3.2.5 Scalability and Future Market Costs [81] Renewall expressed concern that the project included costs for potential future requirements if the renewable to retail market expands, rather than being limited to the immediate market develo...

AI summary Renewall raised concerns about NS Power's inclusion of scalability costs for future market expansion in its project, arguing that no specific evidence was provided to support these claims. Renewall suggested that NS Power should file a Scalability Costing Protocol to address future market entrants. NS Power countered that its work was limited to initial renewable to retail operations and did not expand system capacity.