Topic:"Capacity Market Participation" in M10569

Demand Forecast (2022 Load Forecast Report) (NSUARB M10569) NSPI Responses to EfficiencyOne Information Requests NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-10: 2 3 Reference: NS Power 2022 Load Forecast, page 43, lines 12-13 4 5 “The peak impact assume...

AI summary NSPI responds to EfficiencyOne's questions about EV charging management, acknowledging demand response programs and CPP rate structures as potential tools. NSPI emphasizes the need for detailed program specifics and studies on rate impacts, while addressing concerns about double-counting capacity savings from overlapping initiatives.

ysis of project-specific costs and benefits (including location and technology considerations), and methods for calculating dependable capacity credit for renewable resources.

AI summary The text discusses the analysis of project-specific costs and benefits, including considerations related to location and technology, as well as methods for calculating dependable capacity credit for renewable resources.

dvance California goal for electric vehicles. Budget controls. Reporting requirements. Evaluation, monitoring and verification processes. Outreach to small business customers. John D. Wilson • Resource Insight, Incorporated Page 8 Californ...

AI summary The text discusses John D. Wilson's involvement in regulatory proceedings in California and Georgia, including testimony on electric vehicle goals, budget controls, and the reasonableness of software costs. It also covers avoided cost reviews and capacity need forecasts in Georgia.

Control Centre has the capability to ensure interruptible 4 customers are not contributing to peak demand during emergency conditions, over 5 long durations if necessary”. 28 6 7 E1 does not believe ELCC should be excluded entirely given N...

AI summary E1 argues against excluding ELCC entirely, citing NS Power's 2020 IRP analysis that omitted response time in capacity value modeling. NS Power differentiates curtailing interruptible customers from demand response, but E1 contends ELCC calculations should account for such differences. The debate centers on reliability and definitions of demand response programs.

n process, as well as a scenario analysis for ETS to moderate peak load. It will monitor growth in heating load for commercial customers and work with EOne on possible firm peak mitigation strategies. NS Power confirmed that the model used...

AI summary NS Power discusses heat pump COP assumptions, DSM allocation between commercial and industrial classes, and rejects intervenor requests on line loss modeling and ELCC factors for LIIR. It also denies a request for commercial electrification analysis and plans to address EV load shapes with ELCC adjustments.

2022 M10569 NOVA SCOTIA UTILITY AND REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act IN THE MATTER OF: Nova Scotia Power Incorporated’s 2022 Load Forecast Report NOTICE OF INTERVENTION OF: K + S Windsor Salt Ltd. CKF Inc. Crown Fibr...

AI summary The Industrial Group, comprising multiple large and medium industrial customers of Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI), intervenes in the proceeding regarding NSPI’s 2022 Load Forecast Report under the Public Utilities Act. Their costs are directly impacted by the application, and they seek to address issues established by the Utility and Review Board.

Peak Pricing” and “Business, Non-Profit & Industrial Curtailment” separately for Figure 38 54. 39 c) Is response time a factor considered while computing these ELCC values? 40 41

AI summary The text discusses the separate consideration of 'Peak Pricing' and a curtailment program for businesses, non-profits, and industry in Figure 38, 54, and inquires whether response time affects the computation of Effective Load-Carrying Capacity (ELCC) values.