Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Capital Expenditures" in M12619

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan - $284 million
1448 passages 68 documents

Capital Expenditures across all matters →

N-1Application - Redacted 751 passages
Section 1
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Energy Board IN THE MATTER OF Section 35A of The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for Approval...

AI summary This document pertains to Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s application for approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan under Section 35A of The Public Utilities Act. The filing date is December 12, 2025, and the document is marked as confidential with attachments only.

Section 3
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 7 4 2.0 2026 ACE PLAN STRUCTURE ...................................................................

AI summary The document outlines the structure and details of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including stakeholder engagement, deferred or cancelled capital items from the 2025 ACE Plan, and a summary of expenditures and capital items for the 2026 ACE Plan. It also covers generation-related capital spending.

Section 4
ION ................................................................................................................. 40 18 6.1 Generation – Carry-over Capital Spending Summary .......................................... 43 19 6.2 Generatio...

AI summary The text outlines sections of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including carry-over and new capital spending items for Generation, Transmission, Distribution, and General Plant. The document is marked as confidential and contains attachments.

Section 6
1 10.2 Routine Capital Spending Project Breakdown Yr/Yr ........................................... 60 2 10.3 Like-for-Like Routine Replacements ................................................................... 64 3 10.4 2026 Routine Cap...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 routine capital spending project breakdown, including directives related to the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, alignment with the Evergreen Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), and forecasts for ACE Plan expenditures from 2026 to 2030 by functional class and spending program.

Section 9
1 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 3 The Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power, Company) Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) 4 Plan Application provides customers, the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB, Board), and other 5 stakeholders with a comprehe...

AI summary NS Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Application outlines proposed capital investments totaling $702.1 million, with $284.0 million requested for approval from the Nova Scotia Energy Board. The plan aligns with the 2030 Clean Power Plan and Evergreen IRP Action Plan. The establishment of the Independent Electricity System Operator in Nova Scotia (IESO-NS) has impacted project accountability and planning.

Section 12
1 2 In preparing its capital plans, NS Power utilizes its established asset management approach, and 3 considers safety, reliability, climate change adaptation, and affordability, while incorporating the 4 Company’s decarbonization targets...

AI summary NS Power uses an asset management approach to prepare capital plans, focusing on reliability, resiliency, and affordability. The 2026 ACE Plan includes investments in reliability-focused improvements to the T&D system, addressing challenges from severe weather events through vegetation management, storm hardening, and grid modernization.

Section 13
bility. These targeted reliability projects include vegetation 26 management, storm hardening and reliability upgrades, targeted device replacements, and 27 grid modernization. 28 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 8 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CO...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan focuses on safety compliance, environmental compliance, and aligning with the coal phase-out and renewable energy goals. It includes projects such as hydro dam safety upgrades, PCB remediation, and grid modernization, and addresses directives from the 2025 ACE Plan Decision.

Section 16
1 2.0 2026 ACE PLAN STRUCTURE 2 3 The following provides an overview of how the 2026 ACE Plan is organized. 4 5 • Section 3.0 – Introduction – This section provides a high-level summary of the overall 6 expenditures in the 2026 ACE Plan, i...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan is structured into sections that outline expenditures, follow-up on the 2025 ACE Plan, details of the 2026 capital expenditures, and categorization of projects by type such as generation and transmission. It includes information on approval processes and exemptions under the Public Utilities Act.

Section 19
1 electricity from the generation plants to the distribution system throughout the province. 2 Transmission includes assets and equipment operating at 69 kV level or higher, and also 3 includes substation assets. 4 5 • Section 8.0 – Distri...

AI summary This section outlines the different categories of capital projects and expenditures, including transmission, distribution, general plant, and routine capital programs, with a focus on the Company’s ACE Plan and directives issued by the Board.

Section 22
1 The 2026 ACE Plan also includes the following information provided as separate appendices: 2 3 • Confidentiality Matrix (Appendix A) – The confidentiality matrix provides a listing of 4 capital items submitted for approval, their attachm...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan includes appendices such as a confidentiality matrix, project listings, updated capital reports, and revised capital expenditure justification criteria. These materials aim to enhance transparency and provide the Board with detailed information for evaluation.

Section 23
revisions, and updates in track changes for the Detailed and Summary CEJC are provided. 25 In accordance with the Board’s 2016 ACE Plan directive which requires stakeholder 26 engagement of CEJC amendments prior to submission to the Board,...

AI summary The document outlines updates and revisions to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including the Mersey Hydro Redevelopment Project, The Path to 2030 report, and the Five-Year Reliability Plan, all in accordance with directives from the Board's ACE Plans from 2016, 2023-2025, and 2024-2025.

Section 24
with the Board’s 2025 ACE Plan directives, a list of transmission line 17 replacement and upgrade projects that have been approved since the 2021 ACE Plan and 18 completed is provided. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 13 of 782 REDACTED REDACT...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines NS Power's capital budget of $702.1 million, with a request for NSEB approval of $284.0 million for 20 capital work orders and the 2026 capital routine program. The plan includes forecasts for capital spending through 2030, though external funding for these initiatives is expected but not yet quantifiable.

Section 25
.1 $700.0 $589.5 $600.0 $502.2 $500.0 $400.0 $300.0 $200.0 $100.0 $0.0 5 Yr 2025 F as 2026 B 2027 F 2028 F 2029 F 2030 F Average of Q3 2021-2025 19 20 F = Forecast, B = Budget in above figure Date: December 12, 2025 Page 14 of 782 REDACTED...

AI summary The document presents a visual representation of Total Annual Capital Expenditures (ACE) by function over various years, showing actuals, forecasts, and budget figures from 2021 to 2030, with specific emphasis on the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 26
ACE Q3F Budget Generation $157.7 $194.4 $147.0 $142.1 $203.4 $188.1 $178.2 $211.6 $229.8 $207.2 $184.9 Transmission $56.9 $56.2 $97.8 $89.6 $239.9 $256.5 $241.1 $233.1 $216.4 $171.9 $116.8 Distribution $116.1 $209.9 $148.5 $141.7 $179.3 $1...

AI summary The document presents a budget breakdown for various energy sectors including Generation, Transmission, Distribution, and General Plant over a series of financial periods, showing fluctuating costs across these categories.

Section 27
$59.7 $76.5 $65.1 $92.4 $83.7 $125.3 $105.0 $86.5 Total $387.6 $540.2 $451.1 $433.1 $699.1 $692.4 $702.1 $724.3 $772.8 $712.5 $589.5 Note: Totals may be off by $0.1M due to rounding. The 2025 Q3 Forecast includes actuals up to July and for...

AI summary NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan focuses on capital investments to maintain and improve system performance and support the Clean Power Plan. Projects are selected based on Board-approved methodologies to ensure value to customers. Key areas include sustaining capital, customer/load-driven investments, and ECEI – Synchronous Condenser projects.

Section 28
REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 investment types for 2026. NS Power’s investments toward sustaining the Company’s assets, 2 customer driven investments required for load...

AI summary NS Power outlines its 2026 ACE Plan, forecasting capital investments for sustaining assets, load growth, regulatory compliance, and right-of-way widening. The forecast is expected to improve with new information over time.

Section 29
027 2028 2029 2030 10 11 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 16 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 4: Breakdown of Capital Forecast by Investment Type 2 (Millions of...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan provides a capital forecast breakdown by investment type for the years 2026 to 2030, including categories such as sustaining, customer/load driven, regulatory/compliance, and specific projects like energy storage and synchronous condensers.

Section 30
. 3 4 Figure 5: Breakdown of Capital Forecast by Investment Type 5 (Millions of Dollars) Investment Type 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 Generation Reliability 178.2 211.6 229.8 207.2 184.9 T&D Reliability 234.9 247.9 256.0 281.7 244.9 New Custom...

AI summary The document presents a breakdown of capital forecasts by investment type for the years 2026 to 2030, including categories such as Generation Reliability, T&D Reliability, New Customer, Core, and ECEI initiatives. It also introduces NS Power’s Asset Management Mechanism, which is used for risk-informed decision-making as part of the Strategic Asset Management Plan.

Section 31
82 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 mitigation strategies, ensuring alignment with NS Power’s operational mission and delivering the 2 greatest value to customers. 3 4 A c...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines mitigation strategies for high-risk assets based on criticality and condition, emphasizing the importance of aligning with NS Power’s operational mission and delivering value to customers. Mitigation approaches include capital investment, refurbishment, and modifications to maintenance practices, with a focus on affordability and feasibility.

Section 32
tuitive and formalized methods (e.g., FMECA) to assess Date: December 12, 2025 Page 18 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 criticality, particularly for new or complex...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan discusses the evaluation of asset criticality and condition using the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). It outlines a risk-based methodology for assessing asset health and prioritizing investments based on risk ratings and other factors such as customer affordability and regulatory context.

Section 33
ability 23 • Customer affordability and regulatory context 24 25 Figure 6 below provides a visual representation of the AM Mechanism and its role in risk 26 evaluation and mitigation. 27 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 19 of 782 REDACTED REDA...

AI summary NS Power is requesting Board approval for a 2026 ACE Plan, which includes $49.0 million in capital items and $207.3 million in capital routine programs, as well as amendments to the CEJC. The document outlines the context of customer affordability and regulatory considerations.

Section 35
1 4.0 2025 ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE PLAN FOLLOW-UP 2 3 This section addresses items arising from the 2025 ACE Plan. These items include a list of 4 subsequent submittal capital items from the 2025 ACE Plan that are planned to be submitte...

AI summary This section outlines follow-up actions related to the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including updates on the Five-Year Reliability Plan, removal of SAIDI reporting, and initiation of a third-party review process under matter M12558.

Section 36
hrough this process. 24 4. The Board directs NS Power to update the equivalent of Figure 3 in the 2025 ACE Plan 25 application about priority distribution feeders in the 2026 ACE Plan. 5 Please refer to 26 Appendix G. 2 M12012, NS Power 20...

AI summary The NSEB directs NS Power to update information regarding priority distribution feeders in the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, referencing Appendix G and citing previous Board Order M12012.

Section 38
1 5. The Board directs NS Power to provide an update on the Centre for Energy Advancement 2 through Technological Innovation (CEATI) Grid Resiliency working group in the 2026 3 ACE Plan. 6 Please refer to Section 11.1.4. 4 6. The Board dir...

AI summary The Board has directed NS Power to provide updates and analyses related to several projects and plans, including the Centre for Energy Advancement through Technological Innovation (CEATI) Grid Resiliency working group, pole upgrades, The Path to 2030, and the Mersey Hydro System Redevelopment Project, as part of the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 39
next depreciation study with the Board prior to filing the 2026 ACE plan, the Board expects 22 the Company to provide an update on the activities it conducted since the filing of the 2025 23 ACE Plan related to evaluating and costing the M...

AI summary The NSEB requires NS Power to provide an update on activities related to the Mersey Hydro System decommissioning and partial decommissioning options since the 2025 ACE Plan was filed, and to include cost estimates for preliminary engineering, stakeholder engagement, and environmental studies in the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 41
1 engineering design costs, and procurement costs, in its Mersey system update in the 2026 2 ACE Plan. These cost estimates are also to be included in NS Power’s filing of its NPV 3 analysis comparing the Mersey Redevelopment Project to th...

AI summary The NSEB directs NS Power to include engineering, procurement, and design costs in its 2026 ACE Plan and NPV analysis of the Mersey Redevelopment Project. It also mandates a quality control step in the Project Delivery Model (PDM) and requires NS Power to submit capital expenditures over $1 million for Board approval.

Section 42
mit any future capital expenditures that exceed $1 20 million for approval to the Board, regardless of the source of funding. 13 NS Power 21 acknowledges the Board’s directive, and confirms its intention to comply; the first project 22 app...

AI summary NS Power acknowledges the Board's directive to seek approval for any future capital expenditures exceeding $1 million. The first project under this directive is CI C0080252, which has a total below $1 million due to federal funding. The 2026 ACE Plan application is also mentioned, with a directive for NS Power to update its response to CA IR-16c.

Section 44
1 transmission line replacement and upgrade projects completed since filing of the 2025 2 ACE Plan application. 14 Please refer to Appendix I. 3 14. The Board directs that NS Power consult with stakeholders about incorporating a 4 definiti...

AI summary The NSEB directed NS Power to consult stakeholders on updating the CEJC to include a definition of Scope Change for the 2026 ACE Plan. NS Power held an engagement session and received feedback from the Consumer Advocate, Small Business Advocate, and Industrial Group, with the SBA suggesting aligning the Scope Change definition with the definition of Scope.

Section 47
1 • The IG provided comments on the proposed definitions of Scope and Scope Change, noting 2 that they differ from traditional project management terminology and how NS Power has 3 historically defined Scope in capital project applications...

AI summary The Independent Governor (IG) provided feedback on the proposed definitions of 'Scope' and 'Scope Change' within the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC), noting discrepancies with traditional project management terminology and NS Power's historical definitions. NS Power has considered this feedback and clarified that the definition of 'Scope Change' is intentionally limited to changes in stated intent to avoid excessive regulatory filings.

Section 50
1 single ATO or, if the project is complete, a FIN application with explanatory commentary rather 2 than filing a separate Scope Change application. This approach consolidates all known information 3 into one filing, ensuring transparency...

AI summary NS Power proposes consolidating Scope Change applications into a single ATO or FIN application to improve regulatory efficiency. The focus on prudency emphasizes significant changes over routine adjustments. NS Power is open to updating the CEJC to include scope changes when alternatives in the project rationale shift. The Company values stakeholder input and collaboration.

Section 51
continues to believe that the stakeholder engagement process provides an open and 24 collaborative forum to address areas of interest. 25 26 Please refer to Appendix D, which includes the stakeholder engagement materials, the list of CEJC...

AI summary The document discusses the stakeholder engagement process and the submission of the Detailed and Summary CEJC by NS Power, requesting their acceptance and approval. It also references the 2026 ACE Plan, which is marked as confidential.

Section 54
04,683 2,433,081 490,468 568,317 Project less than $1M Refurbishment C0068566 LIN DCS Upgrade 2025 1,300,715 1,440,911 697,061 1,270,573 Approved C0067023 LIN2 2024/25 Capacity 371,610 1,083,800 1,290,724 1,257,127 Approved Requirement

AI summary The text presents a list of projects with their respective costs and statuses. Projects include a LIN DCS Upgrade and a LIN2 2024/25 Capacity Requirement, with details on approved amounts and statuses.

Section 55
,911 697,061 1,270,573 Approved C0067023 LIN2 2024/25 Capacity 371,610 1,083,800 1,290,724 1,257,127 Approved Requirement Transmission C0044391 Eastern Clean Energy 20,641,301 800,229,290 42,563,143 684,624,989 Filed by Wasoqonatl Initiati...

AI summary The document outlines various transmission and infrastructure projects, including the Eastern Clean Energy Initiative (ECEI) and the 2026 ACE Plan, with associated costs and approval statuses. These projects are part of broader efforts to enhance energy infrastructure in Nova Scotia.

Section 56
796,677 1,346,809 - 2,457,629 2026 ACE Plan Upgrades Subsequent Submittal C0041830 Spare Power Production 1,258,324 1,264,622 1,205,613 1,266,552 Approved Unit Transformer Date: December 12, 2025 Page 28 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENT...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 ACE Plan, including project details such as Spare Power Production and Fault Location, Isolation, and Service Restoration (FLISR) Implementation. The FLISR project is awaiting approval with updated budget figures provided.

Section 58
General Plant C0021835 IT - CIS Replacement 2,243,592 77,890,771 1,442,723 84,502,844 2026 ACE Plan Subsequent Submittal C0061284 IT - OT Cyber Security 2,723,682 5,459,313 198,246 6,780,461 Approved Control Implementation C0053699 Renewab...

AI summary The text lists various IT and infrastructure projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including cybersecurity, distributed intelligence applications, and depot improvements, with details on costs and approval statuses.

Section 59
Connectivity Subsequent Submittal Enhancements C0068714 IT - Identity & Access 963,267 1,275,524 1,641,892 4,324,589 2026 ACE Plan Management Subsequent Submittal C0061285 IT - Enterprise 664,056 1,179,857 29,797 848,825 2026 ACE Plan Gove...

AI summary The document outlines deferred and cancelled capital work orders from the 2025 ACE Plan, noting that 21 projects have been cancelled and 39 have been deferred. These decisions are guided by NS Power’s asset management processes. Total forecast investment for these 60 projects was $60.3 million in 2025.

Section 60
he Company’s decisions related to Date: December 12, 2025 Page 29 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 project deferrals to ensure risks are being appropriately managed...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlines NS Power's proposed capital investments totaling approximately $256.3 million. It includes routine capital expenditures and 20 projects, with some items not requiring NSEB approval but included for transparency. The plan also includes carryover projects from previous years.

Section 61
he 2026 ACE Plan budget also includes 10 investment on multi-year projects that were previously approved by the NSEB (Carryover 11 Projects). 12 13 Figure 8: 2026 Capital Investments by Category Capital Items NSEB Previously 2026 NSEB Fore...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan budget includes investments in multi-year projects previously approved by the NSEB, referred to as Carryover Projects. It outlines capital items approved through the 2026 ACE Process, items submitted for later approval, and carryover projects from previous years. The total 2026 ACE Plan is $702.1 million.

Section 62
.1 Note: NS Power is seeking approval of $207.3 million of routine investment in 2026. Note: Figures presented in the ACE Plan document reflect rounding differences on some line items. 14 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 31 of 782 REDACTED RED...

AI summary NS Power is seeking approval for $49.0 million in capital expenditures in 2026, with a total forecast investment of approximately $76.7 million. The 2026 ACE Plan includes seven new capital items related to boiler refurbishments, turbine replacements, and structural improvements.

Section 63
TUC3 IP Turbine Refurbishment 13,621 2,588,734 G07 C0068888 TUC3 Continuous Ash Hauling System 1,192,814 1,359,984 Total New Steam Spending $14,416,111 $21,441,542 Gas Turbine G08 C0080135 CT - BGT2 Engine Refurbishment 2,147,663 2,462,664...

AI summary The document outlines capital expenditure plans for various projects in 2026, including turbine refurbishments, transmission upgrades, and other infrastructure improvements, with detailed budget allocations and project totals.

Section 64
ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) Tab # CI# Project Title 2026 Budget ($) Project Total ($) Distribution D01 C0080266 New Distribution Right of Way Phase 11 18,551,713 20,889,694 D02 C0080104 36V-303 Baxter's Harbour Rd Reconductor...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 budget and project totals for various capital expenditures under the ACE Plan, including new distribution, general plant, and routine capital spending, with a total capital spending request of $256,305,380.

Section 65
Total Routine Capital Spending $207,302,889 $207,302,889 Total Capital Items for which Approval is Sought $256,305,380 $283,999,129 This project total has been reduced below $1M due to federal funding. 1 2 5.3 2026 ACE Plan Capital Items F...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including total routine capital spending and projected capital items for approval. The ACE Plan includes projects expected to be filed for review and approval in 2026, with estimated investments of $174.5 million and total investment of approximately $688.9 million.

Section 67
1 Figure 10: 2026 Capital Items Forecast for Subsequent Submittal CI# Project Title 2026 Budget ($) Project Total ($) Generation Hydro 47649 HYD Salmontail Gate Pedestal and Main Dam Refurbishment 463,325 5,870,708 This project aims to ref...

AI summary The document outlines a 2026 Capital Items Forecast for hydroelectric projects in Nova Scotia, detailing budget and total project costs for various refurbishment and improvement initiatives aimed at managing asset risks and ensuring safe operations.

Section 72
1,102,575 1,353,592 This project is for refurbishment of priority areas of the roof at the Sydney Coal Railway Transportation & Rail Maintenance Centre (Rail Centre). Total New Steam Spending for Subsequent Approval 10,402,603 24,560,654 T...

AI summary The text outlines various capital expenditure projects in Nova Scotia, including roof refurbishment, synchronous condensers, transmission tower rerouting, and network upgrades for wind farms. These projects aim to enhance infrastructure and support renewable energy integration.

Section 73
transmission interconnection of the new Goose Harbour Lake (Port Hawkesbury Paper) Wind Farm in Guysborough County, in the Provincial Rate Base Procurement (RBP) program. C0069534 IR 669 Network Upgrade Higgins Mountain Wind 4,497,188 9,49...

AI summary The text discusses capital expenditures related to wind farm transmission interconnections and substation construction within the Provincial Rate Base Procurement (RBP) program, including the Goose Harbour Lake and Higgins Mountain Wind projects, as well as the Susie Lake Substation. The 2026 ACE Plan is also mentioned, with confidential attachments.

Section 75
CI# Project Title 2026 Budget ($) Project Total ($) C0071888 New Tidewater Substation 4,119,741 4,141,223 This project is to build a new Tidewater Substation to address increased residential electricity demand, improve system reliability,...

AI summary The document outlines several capital projects aimed at improving electricity infrastructure in Nova Scotia, including new substations, transformer replacements, and transmission line upgrades to enhance system reliability and meet growing demand.

Section 76
or the replacement of the 10H-T2 transformer which serves the Victoria General Hospital and the IWK Children’s Hospital in Halifax. C0080108 L-5532 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 908,755 2,490,532 This project is for the replacement of...

AI summary The document outlines several transmission line replacement and upgrade projects, including the replacement of the 10H-T2 transformer serving key hospitals, upgrades to L-5532 and L-6043 transmission lines, and network upgrades for the Benjamin’s Mill Wind Farm. These projects are part of ongoing infrastructure planning and investment in Nova Scotia's power grid.

Section 77
the Provincial Rate Base Procurement (RBP) program. Total New Transmission Spending for Subsequent Approval 121,852,772 473,358,167 Distribution C0080102 92H-331 Double Circuit Peggys Cove Rd 1,704,973 1,882,573 This project will add a sec...

AI summary The text outlines the Provincial Rate Base Procurement (RBP) program, including details on new transmission and distribution spending for subsequent approval, with specific projects and costs listed. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is marked as confidential.

Section 78
f 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only)

AI summary The document contains a 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is marked as confidential and includes attachments. The content is redacted, indicating that sensitive information has been removed.

Section 79
CI# Project Title 2026 Budget ($) Project Total ($) General Plant C0082133 IT - Renew Microsoft Enterprise Agreement 1,800,000 1,800,000 This project funds the on-premises portion of the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement for software assuranc...

AI summary The document outlines several IT and infrastructure projects planned for 2026, including the renewal of Microsoft Enterprise Agreement, implementation of distributed intelligence apps, a DERMS solution, and improvements to the Sydney Depot. Each project includes budget allocations and total project costs.

Section 81
eliver and manage data integrations in a more timely and cost effective manner. C0047278 IT - Oracle MDM Upgrade 4,684,089 7,949,409 The Meter Data Management (MDM) System is nearing end-of-life and requires an upgrade to maintain vendor s...

AI summary The text discusses the need to upgrade the Meter Data Management (MDM) System and the Advanced Distribution Management System (ADMS) to ensure vendor support, cybersecurity, and compatibility with emerging technologies. These upgrades are part of the 2026 ACE Plan and involve significant financial investments.

Section 82
TED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) CI# Project Title 2026 Budget ($) Project Total ($) C0062043 IT - SharePoint Technical Migration 1,990,219 3,134,674 This project will migrate bu...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 ACE Plan, including a project to migrate business records to SharePoint online. It also mentions total capital items for subsequent approval, with a focus on projects with estimated costs of less than $1,000,000.

Section 83
ment reached with stakeholders pursuant to NS Power’s report provided to the Board on 8 September 5, 2017 (2017 stakeholder agreement). 9 10 Figure 11: Historical Value of Projects Less Than $1M (Millions of dollars) Value of Projects Less...

AI summary The text presents historical data on the value and number of projects less than $1M from 2023 to 2026, including categories such as Gas Turbine, Steam, Hydro, Wind, Transmission, Distribution, and General Plant. It references a 2017 stakeholder agreement and includes a 2026 ACE Plan with confidential attachments.

Section 84
N REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 12: Historical Number of Projects Less Than $1M # of Projects Less than $1M Function 2023 2024 2025 2026 Gas Turbine 21 22 11 46 Steam 159 226 263 330 Hydro 13 15 15 15 Wind...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan includes a table showing the number of projects under $1M across various functions, with totals increasing from 2023 to 2026. Appendix B provides a list of these projects for transparency, though they do not require NSEB approval.

Section 85
D REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 6.0 GENERATION 2 3 Generation capital includes replacements, refurbishments and additions to NS Power’s Thermal, 4 Hydro, Wind, Combustion Turbin...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan discusses NS Power's capital investment in generation, highlighting increases due to major thermal outages and hydro dam safety projects, aligning with the updated unit missions of the legacy thermal fleet as outlined in the 10 Year System Outlook filing.

Section 86
ration investment by investment 18 type. 19 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 40 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 14: 2026 Thermal Investment by Investment Type 2...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines NS Power’s investment in generation, including both traditional and renewable sources. Investments are guided by asset management and the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC).

Section 87
f 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only)

AI summary The document contains a 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is marked as confidential and includes attachments. The content is redacted, indicating that sensitive information has been removed.

Section 89
rticular consideration given to the role they play with respect to achieving renewable energy 28 and coal phase-out goals. The approximately $178.2 million generation capital investment plan 29 for 2026 is summarized in Figure 16 below. 30...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines a capital investment plan of approximately $178.2 million, with specific allocations for different categories of projects. This includes new capital spending for projects over $1 million, future projects, and smaller projects not requiring approval.

Section 91
iv Carry-over capital spending. (As provided in Section 6.1) 38.5 v Routine capital spending. (As provided in Section 10) 6.7 Total 2026 Generation Capital Investment Plan 178.2 Request for ACE Approval (Items i and v) 23.3 Note 1: Totals...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Generation Capital Investment Plan, including carry-over and routine capital spending for various hydro generation projects in Nova Scotia. It provides details on project titles, dates, and budget estimates for ongoing and future expenditures.

Section 92
2018/06 2026/05 13,853,095 24,047 - 13,877,142 49756 HYD Marshall Falls Dam Refurbishment 2016/12 2030/09 917,387 641,240 12,291,829 13,850,456 C0050414 HYD Roseway Asset Decommissioning 2022/07 2026/09 4,738,368 47,619 - 4,785,987 C007048...

AI summary The text presents a table of various hydroelectric projects with start and end dates, costs, and other financial details, followed by a reference to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is marked as confidential.

Section 93
2 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) CI# Project Title Start Final Previous 2026 Budget Subsequent Total Date Date Expenditure ($) Spending Estimate ($) ($) ($) C0080112 HYD B...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, detailing various hydroelectric projects with their start and final dates, previous expenditures, and budget estimates. These projects include rotor reinsulation, control upgrades, generator refurbishments, and monitoring enhancements.

Section 94
250,269 41,508 - 291,777 C0068251 HYD WRC D11 Valve and Housing 2024/06 2027/02 52,425 232,209 - 284,634 Replacement Total Hydro Generation Plant 203,567,087 $24,403,993 $74,540,346 $302,511,425

AI summary The text presents data on capital expenditures and replacements for hydro generation plant components, including a valve and housing replacement project with costs and timelines listed.

Section 96
Steam Generation Plant C0060608 TUC6 Turbine Refurbishment 2024/01 2026/07 562,396 1,900,000 - 2,462,396 C0068566 LIN DCS Migration 2024/07 2027/01 697,457 573,116 - 1,270,573 C0055155 TUC2 Stack 1 Platform Replacement 2022/12 2026/12 109,...

AI summary The document outlines various capital projects related to the Steam Generation Plant, including turbine refurbishments, DCS migration, and infrastructure replacements, with associated costs and timelines spanning from 2022 to 2027.

Section 97
2/01 2026/12 3,265 36,251 - 39,516 Total Steam Generation Plant 3,250,145 5,984,853 - 9,234,999 Gas Turbine Generation Plant C0073491 LM6000 191-443 Engine Replacement 2024/08 2025/10 61,326 4,745,151 19,410,812 24,217,289 C0060707 CT BGT1...

AI summary The text presents a table with project details from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including project numbers, titles, start and final dates, budget expenditures, and spending estimates. The information is part of a confidential attachment within a regulatory proceeding document.

Section 98
Date Date Expenditure ($) Spending Estimate ($) ($) ($) Total Gas Turbine Generation Plant 161,767 5,772,407 22,320,812 28,254,986 Wind Generation C0044030 WIN - DIG Haights Brook Crossing 2022/02 2027/03 287,490 1,929,592 - 2,217,082 Repl...

AI summary The text presents a table outlining expenditures and spending estimates for various generation projects in Nova Scotia, including gas turbine generation, wind generation, and carry-over spending. The data includes specific project names, dates, and financial figures.

Section 99
516,995 2,382,805 86,223.00 2,986,023 Total Generation Carry-Over Spending 207,495,994 38,544,059 96,947,381 342,987,433 1 2 6.2 Generation – New 2026 Capital Items for ACE Plan Approval 3 4 Figure 18: Generation – New 2026 Capital Items f...

AI summary The text outlines capital expenditure items for the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan approval, including refurbishment and replacement projects for boiler and turbine systems at the Steam Generation Plant and Gas Turbine Generation Plant.

Section 100
416,111 21,441,542 Gas Turbine Generation Plant G08 C0080135 CT - BGT2 Engine Refurbishment 2,147,663 2,462,664 Total Gas Turbine Generation Plant 2,147,663 2,462,664 Total Generation New Spending 16,563,774 23,904,206 5 Date: December 12,...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, focusing on transmission investments from 2024 to 2028. The increased investment is attributed to Energy Storage and Synchronous Condenser projects. A figure illustrates historical, forecast, and budgeted transmission investments, highlighting a rising trend in spending.

Section 101
$171.9 $150.0 $116.8 $108.1 $100.0 $50.0 $0.0 5 Yr 2025 F as 2026 B 2027 F 2028 F 2029 F 2030 F Average of Q3 2021-2025 13 14 F = Forecast, B = Budget in above figure 15 16 Figure 20 provides a breakdown of the 2026 transmission investment...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines transmission investment allocations, with a focus on sustaining and regulatory/compliance-related expenditures, including ECEI, right-of-way widening, and other initiatives, with figures provided in millions of dollars.

Section 102
Right-of-Way Widening 128.9 ECEI 7.2 3 3.3 4 5 Transmission investment is guided by NS Power’s Asset Management mechanism and the Capital 6 Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). Asset condition and criticality are evaluated using the...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power’s transmission investment strategy, guided by its Asset Management mechanism and Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). It emphasizes reliability, customer growth, and compliance with environmental obligations, including the Clean Power Plan, which aims for 80% renewable electricity by 2030. Investments in the Eastern Clean Energy Initiative (ECEI) and battery storage are highlighted.

Section 103
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 For additional detail on NS Power’s reliability strategy, including metrics and resilience planning, 2 please refer to Section 11.1.4. 3 4 The focu...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines NS Power’s transmission capital investments, totaling approximately $241.1 million, with a focus on system reliability, energy storage, and synchronous condensers. The plan includes spending for projects over $1 million, with some approvals sought after the filing of the ACE Plan.

Section 104
iii 2.7 $1,000,000 for which approval is not sought. (As provided in Appendix B) iv Carry-over capital spending. (As provided in Section 7.1) 83.4 v Routine capital spending. (As provided in Section 10) 22.0 Total 2026 Transmission Capital...

AI summary This section outlines the 2026 Transmission Capital Investment Plan, including carry-over capital spending and routine capital spending. It details specific projects such as energy storage, substation upgrades, and transformer replacements with their respective budgets and expenditures.

Section 107
CI# Project Title Start Final Previous 2026 Budget Subsequent Total Estimate Date Date Expenditure ($) Spending ($) ($) ($) C0031122 L6539 2021 Replacements and Upgrades 2021/01 2026/06 1,547,125 2,780,796 1,172,203 5,500,124 C0061550 L503...

AI summary The document presents a list of capital infrastructure projects with their respective start and final dates, previous expenditures, and total estimated spending. These projects include replacements and upgrades across various sectors, with some projects extending beyond 2026.

Section 109
2 C0052654 L5541 Water Crossing Upgrades 2023/05 2027/03 3,264 305,788 584,906 893,958 C0061046 2024 Merlin Gerin Breaker Replacements 2023/09 2026/06 358,403 423,012 - 781,416 C0041812 L6040 Replacements and Upgrades 2022/07 2027/03 9,532...

AI summary The text presents a table of capital expenditure projects related to infrastructure upgrades, including details such as project numbers, descriptions, start and end dates, and associated costs. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, indicating that the information is confidential and pertains to attachments only.

Section 110
782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 7.2 Transmission – New 2026 Capital Items for ACE Plan Approval 2 3 Figure 23: Transmission – New 2026 Capital Items for ACE Plan Appr...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for transmission projects in Nova Scotia, listing specific capital items with their 2026 budgets and total project costs. These projects include transformer replacements, switch upgrades, and breaker replacements.

Section 111
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 8.0 DISTRIBUTION 2 3 Distribution includes replacement of, and additions to, equipment for delivering electricity from 4 points on the transmission...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines NS Power's distribution investment, including historical, forecast, and budget figures, with a focus on capital spending for delivering electricity at voltages below 69 kV. Figure 25 provides a breakdown of the 2026 distribution investment by investment type.

Section 112
L (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 25: 2026 Distribution Investment by Investment Type 2 (Millions of dollars) Distribution 31.8 8.9 Sustaining 79.2 Customer/Load Driven Regulatory/Compliance Right-of-Way Widening 70.6 3 4 5 Distribution invest...

AI summary The 2026 Distribution investment plan, totaling approximately $190.5 million, is driven by asset management strategies and customer load growth. The investment focuses on sustaining capital, reliability, and regulatory compliance.

Section 113
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 26: Summary of 2026 Distribution Capital Investments 2 (Millions of dollars) New 2026 capital spending for projects with total estimated pro...

AI summary The text outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, detailing distribution capital investments in three categories, with specific figures for each. The summary provides an overview of capital spending for projects with varying levels of approval requirements and estimated spending.

Section 115
iv Carry-over capital spending. (As provided in Section 8.1) 15.5 v Routine capital spending. (As provided in Section 10) 140.5 Total 2026 Distribution Capital Investment Plan 190.5 Request for ACE Approval (Items i and v) 160.7 Note 1: To...

AI summary The text outlines the 2026 Distribution Capital Investment Plan, including carry-over and routine capital spending, with details on specific projects such as Advanced Meter Infrastructure and the D-Cogswell HRM Redevelopment Program, along with their budgets and expenditures.

Section 116
8 1,185,364 2,286,083 Replacement C0071954 87W-312 Dauphiness Mill Lake Rebuild 2024/10 2026/06 5,934 500,000 1,259,111 1,765,045 52184 37N-412-Glooscap Trail Rebuild PH2 2017/09 2026/09 786,166 49,303 337,901 1,173,369 C0070787 91W-411 La...

AI summary The table lists various infrastructure projects with their costs and timelines, including replacements and extensions. The document is part of the 2026 ACE Plan and contains confidential information.

Section 117
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) CI# Project Title Start Final Previous 2026 Budget Subsequent Total Date Date Expenditure ($) Spending ($) Estimate ($) ($) C0053517 9H-221 Universit...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan includes capital projects for distribution infrastructure, such as new right of way development and reconductor phases. The table outlines project details, including start and final dates, previous expenditures, 2026 budget allocations, and total estimated spending for several initiatives.

Section 119
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 9.0 GENERAL PLANT 2 3 General Plant includes information technology (IT), operational technology (OT), computer 4 infrastructure, vehicle replaceme...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlines General Plant investments, which include IT, OT, infrastructure, and communication equipment. These investments support NS Power’s digital transformation, regulatory compliance, and operational resilience, aligning with strategic initiatives like grid modernization and cybersecurity.

Section 120
$83.7 $86.5 $76.5 $80.0 $66.1 $60.0 $40.0 $20.0 $0.0 5 Yr 2025 F as 2026 B 2027 F 2028 F 2029 F 2030 F Average of Q3 2021-2025 21 22 F = Forecast, B = Budget in above figure Date: December 12, 2025 Page 55 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDE...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines general plant capital investment, with a focus on Information Technology and Operational Technology. The total investment is approximately $92.4 million, primarily allocated to sustaining and regulatory/compliance categories.

Section 121
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 31: Summary of 2026 General Plant Capital Investments 2 (Millions of dollars) New 2026 capital spending for projects with total estimated pr...

AI summary The text outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, detailing capital spending for various projects, including new investments, future approvals, and smaller projects not requiring approval.

Section 122
iii 8.8 $1,000,000 for which approval is not sought. (As provided in Appendix B) iv Carry-over capital spending. (As provided in Section 9.1) 16.9 v Routine capital spending. (As provided in Section 10) 38.2 Total 2026 General Plant Invest...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 General Plant Investment Plan, including carry-over capital spending and routine capital spending. It lists several projects with their start and final dates, previous expenditures, 2026 budgets, and total estimates, highlighting the overall investment in infrastructure and technology upgrades.

Section 123
/02 2026/12 245,130 164,874 - 410,004 Total Telecommunications 2,038,491 3,508,360 2,866,859 8,413,711 C0061284 IT - OT Cyber Security Control 2023/11 2026/12 1,957,397 1,917,601 2,905,463 6,780,461 Implementation Phase 1 C0047277 IT - GIS...

AI summary The document outlines various IT projects and their associated costs under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. These projects span cybersecurity, data migration, customer service improvements, and infrastructure upgrades, with detailed cost breakdowns and timelines provided.

Section 124
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) CI# Project Title Start Date Final Date Previous 2026 Budget Subsequent Total Expenditure ($) Spending ($) Estimate ($) ($) C0032664 ECC Optimization...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlines various projects, including ECC Optimization Tools, Renewable to Retail Implementation, and ECC Wind Integration, with their respective budgets, previous expenditures, and total cost estimates.

Section 125
12,296,682 5,885,521 - 18,182,203 Total General Plant Carry-Over Spending 27,398,359 16,901,264 5,772,322 50,071,946 1 2 9.2 General Plant – New 2026 Capital Items for ACE Plan Approval 3 4 Figure 33: General Plant – New 2026 Capital Items...

AI summary The text presents financial figures related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including details on new capital items and spending for General Plant projects. It outlines specific projects such as the RTU Deployment Project and the Intelligent Asset Data Capture & Integration Platform, along with their associated budgets.

Section 126
REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 10.0 ROUTINE CAPITAL PROGRAM 2 3 NS Power’s routine capital program is for recurring annual expenditures of like-for-like 4 replacement of...

AI summary NS Power is seeking NSEB approval for the 2026 routine capital program, which includes expenditures for equipment replacement, system growth, and customer additions, totaling approximately $207.3 million. The document provides a breakdown of capital spending by function for the years 2024 to 2026.

Section 127
ion Other Thermal $563,050 $537,973 $544,902 $495,729 $5,150,911 $7,592,390 $7,703,116 $6,661,024 Transmission Transmission Substation $4,327,200 $4,375,511 $4,370,346 $4,025,131 Replacement, Add'ns/Mod'ns Primary Equipment Spares $91,829...

AI summary The text presents financial data related to various infrastructure and energy projects, including transmission, distribution, and thermal costs, with figures spanning multiple years. The data includes line items such as equipment replacement, right-of-way widening, and meter upgrades. The document is redacted and contains confidential information.

Section 128
$136,149,656 $125,330,493 $140,496,453 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 59 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 2024 2025 2025 2026 Actual Budget Forecast ACE Plan General Pl...

AI summary The document provides a financial breakdown of routine capital spending for the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including actuals, budgets, forecasts, and planned spending across various categories such as work vehicles, tools, telecommunications, and property improvements.

Section 129
ctuals up to July and forecast amounts for the remainder of the year. 1 2 10.2 Routine Capital Spending Project Breakdown Yr/Yr 3 4 Figure 35: Routine Capital Spending Project Breakdown Yr/Yr

AI summary The text references a breakdown of routine capital spending projects on a year-over-year basis, including actuals up to July and forecasts for the remainder of the year.

Section 131
$269,732 $258,741 $122,842 27855 POT - Roofing Routine $145,501 $134,857 $115,073 $132,813 27854 TUC - Roofing Routine $32,082 $50,571 $50,891 $50,709 C0068934 PHB - Roofing Routine $- $125,774 $128,734 $167,434 27857 LIN - Roofing Routine...

AI summary The text presents financial data related to various infrastructure and generation projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including amounts spent on roofing routines, wind equipment replacement, and hydro projects such as oil release risk assessment and dam safety.

Section 132
tine $608,240 $684,627 $660,064 $690,547 Generation Hydro Total $1,202,879 $1,352,219 $1,423,003 $1,390,776 S005 C0068935 PHB - Heat Rate Routine $- $125,023 $131,255 $126,799 33871 TUC - Heat Rate Routine $85,150 $87,482 $81,029 $87,489 3...

AI summary The text presents financial data for various energy-related projects and operations, including generation, transmission, and protection modifications, with detailed cost breakdowns for different years.

Section 133
tion & Replacement $1,006,327 $987,791 $749,316 $862,088 Protection Modification & Replacement Total $1,006,327 $987,791 $749,316 $862,088 T001 23115 Provincial Transmission Line Replace $3,135,399 $3,274,053 $3,251,791 $3,322,385 T011 231...

AI summary The text includes financial figures related to various infrastructure projects, such as transmission line replacements and meter maintenance, and references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is marked as confidential.

Section 134
ge 61 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) Project 2024 2025 2025 2026 CI # Project Title # Actual Budget Forecast ACE Plan D005 23158 Unplanned Replace Deteriorated $26,...

AI summary The text provides a table of projected costs for various projects under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It includes details for different categories of projects, such as unplanned replacements, regulatory replacements, and new customer upgrades. The table outlines actual, budgeted, forecasted, and ACE Plan figures for each project over multiple years.

Section 136
Test Equipment 9,542 127,517 132,940 131,343 Tools and Test Equipment Total $2,148,827 $1,921,927 $1,310,689 $2,728,540 P025 16365 Mobile Radio Routine $234,110 $238,819 $248,243 $224,550 P027 16551 Telecommunication Radio and Fibre $189,8...

AI summary The document presents financial data related to test equipment and telecommunications projects under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including costs for various projects and years. The data includes actuals, budgets, and forecasts, with a focus on capital expenditures.

Section 137
2025 2026 CI # Project Title # Actual Budget Forecast ACE Plan P010 16073 SCADA Improvements Routine $66,249 $50,596 $44,469 $120,428 P031 29114 NS Power IT Infrastructure $280,976 $2,568,500 $918,500 $2,528,500 C0061443 IT - WAM Capital E...

AI summary The document presents a table of capital expenditure projects for 2025 and 2026, including actual costs, budgets, forecasts, and ACE Plan figures for various infrastructure and IT initiatives, such as SCADA improvements and IT infrastructure upgrades.

Section 138
$3,393,573 $4,882,004 $4,932,004 $4,797,200 P030 Property Improvement and Furniture Total $3,393,573 $4,882,004 $4,932,004 $4,797,200 P012/ 20706 Other (HYD - Security Improvement & $528,890 $600,720 $613,565 $590,100 P041 FAC - Land Acqui...

AI summary The text presents financial data related to property improvement, environment equipment replacement, and routine capital spending. It includes figures for various projects and mentions the addition of three new routine categories to enhance regulatory efficiency and transparency.

Section 139
vel of transparency on project costs. 1 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 63 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only)

AI summary The text references the 2026 ACE Plan, indicating a focus on annual capital expenditures. The mention of 'transparency on project costs' suggests a regulatory or financial review process involving cost disclosure.

Section 141
1 10.3 Like-for-Like Routine Replacements 2 3 The Board’s 2013 ACE Plan Order Directive 2 provided as follows: 4 5 The Board directs NSPI, in the next ACE Plan application, to analyze the routine 6 expenditures to determine what are the "l...

AI summary The NSEB directed NSPI in 2013 to analyze routine expenditures in the ACE Plan, specifically focusing on 'like-for-like' spending. The data shows a decrease in total routine spending from 2022 to 2023, but an increase in like-for-like spending by 2024 and 2025. The analysis aims to understand the growth of these costs relative to inflation.

Section 142
completed under the routine is like-for-like replacements, the routine is 17 classified as like-for-like. New Customer routines, System Growth and Performance routines 18 (such as heat rate, system improvement, and right-of-way widening ro...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlines routine capital spending for transmission substation replacements and modifications, including unplanned replacements, lightning arrestor replacements, and other equipment regaskets. Total projected costs for these activities are $3,122,388.

Section 143
y Bank Replacements 150,000 Total T003 Provincial: Transmission Substation Primary Equipment $3,122,388 T004 Provincial: Substation Additions & Replacements Unknown Additions 182,743 Oil Containment Additions 720,000 Total T004 Provincial:...

AI summary The document outlines capital expenditure plans for transmission substation equipment replacements and additions, including costs for primary equipment spares, protection modifications, and transmission line projects under the 2026 ACE Plan Forecast.

Section 144
D) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 2 Figure 40: Transmission Line Replacement, Additions, Modifications 2026 ACE Plan Forecast T001 Provincial Transmission Line Replacement (Unplanned) This routine is budgeted based on hist...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan includes budget allocations for transmission line replacements and modifications, with specific line numbers and descriptions. The plan outlines both unplanned and planned replacements, including costs for various projects across Nova Scotia.

Section 145
11 Provincial - Planned Transmission Line $5,680,154 Replacement T020 Transmission Switch & Breaker Replacements Avg Unit 2026 ACE Asset Quantity Price Plan Forecast Switch (<69 kV) 2 25,721 51,441 Switch (69 kV) 7 33,500 234,500 Switch (1...

AI summary The document outlines planned transmission line replacements and upgrades for 2026, including switch and breaker replacements, as well as tower life extension programs. The total projected cost for these activities is approximately $7.9 million.

Section 146
e Extension Program 20 56,951 1,139,010 $2,266,774 Total Transmission Line Replacement, Additions, $13,595,755 Modifications 1 2 T010 – Provincial: Transmission Right of Way Widening 3 4 In its 2017 ACE Plan Order, the Board directed NS Po...

AI summary The document discusses the 2026 ACE Plan, including cost estimates for vegetation management and right-of-way widening projects based on historical costs. It references a 2017 Board Order (M07745) that directed NS Power to update cost estimates using actual historical data. A figure provides detailed cost breakdowns for specific transmission lines.

Section 147
l Expenditure Plan, Board Order, April 4, 2017. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 67 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only)

AI summary The text references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and a Board Order dated April 4, 2017. It appears to be part of a confidential document related to regulatory proceedings in Nova Scotia, possibly involving capital expenditures and regulatory oversight.

Section 149
1 2 The Board’s 2016 ACE Plan Order provided the following directive: 3 4 The Board directs that the Routine for Transmission widening be treated as a 5 separate project, and not a routine, in future ACE Plan Applications. NSPI is to 6 pro...

AI summary The Board's 2016 ACE Plan Order required NSPI to treat transmission widening as a separate project and provide annual progress reports. The last phase of the 69kV widening program was completed in 2024, and the transmission vegetation management program now includes only two initiatives. The T010 routine for 138kV, 230kV, and 345kV ROWs has increased in budget, reflecting ongoing efforts to improve system resilience.

Section 150
ill 27 continue to improve the transmission system’s ability to withstand significant weather events 28 where tree fall ins from the edge of the ROW can pose a risk to NS Power’s infrastructure. 18 M07176, NS Power 2016 Annual Capital Expe...

AI summary The text discusses NS Power's efforts to improve the transmission system's resilience against weather events, particularly focusing on risks posed by tree falls near the right-of-way. It references the 2016 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan and the 2026 ACE Plan Reliability Directive for details on progress and future plans.

Section 151
f 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only)

AI summary The document contains a 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is marked as confidential and includes attachments. The content is redacted, indicating that sensitive information has been removed.

Section 152
1 Widening these ROWs mitigates the risk of tree fall ins for the vast majority of trees on the edge 2 of the ROW. 3 4 The increased investment in T010 for the widening of 138kV, 230kV, and 345kV rights-of-way 5 remains consistent with the...

AI summary The document discusses the widening of rights-of-way (ROWs) to mitigate tree fall risks and references the 2016 directive on ROW widening for various voltage levels. It also mentions the 2021 Distribution Routines ATO and the requirement for NS Power to report on routine findings in the 2024 ACE Plan, along with forecasting methodologies for distribution routines.

Section 153
nflation D007 Joint Use 3 Year Average Plus Inflation (excluding 2023 actuals) Date: December 12, 2025 Page 69 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) Distribution Routines...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including distribution routines and forecasting methodologies. It mentions various projects and their funding approaches, incorporating inflation adjustments and historical data.

Section 154
FIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 43: Meters - D009 Meter Routine Current Meter 2026 Capital for Item# Prg# Meter Type Description Unit Cost Style Forecast meters ($) ($) 1.0 Element, 120...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan includes details about meter types and their associated costs for the D009 Meter Routine. The table lists specific meter models, quantities, unit costs, and total capital expenditures for the year 2026.

Section 157
Date: December 12, 2025 Page 71 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) Total Meters 11,104 1,609,037 Misc Meters "ION" 6 9,500 57,000 Cellular Meters 12 1,000 12,000 CT and...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which includes details on metering equipment, materials, freight, overhead, and labor costs associated with the plan. The data presented includes the total number of meters, specific types of meters, and associated costs.

Section 158
REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Distribution Upgrades and Replacements 2 3 Figure 44: Distribution Upgrades and Replacements 2026 ACE Plan Forecast D005 Unplanned Replace...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines forecasts for distribution upgrades and replacements, including unplanned equipment replacement, regulatory replacements, and provincial storm-related expenditures. These forecasts are based on historical spending averages, adjusted for inflation, and may vary depending on annual decisions and storm activity.

Section 159
ls with Extreme Event Day storms removed and an annual inflation of 1.8%. There can be $6,927,211 significant variation in this amount based on yearly storm activity. D051 System Performance Improvement 6W-201 - Offload to 50W 82,734 50W-4...

AI summary The document outlines various system performance improvement and distribution equipment replacement projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including costs for storm damage repairs, recloser additions, and targeted equipment replacements. These initiatives aim to enhance grid reliability and address infrastructure needs.

Section 160
le installations.) Conversion Work $940,000 5 year plan feeder level Targeted Equipment Replacement $6,668,263 Total D055 Planned Replacement of Distribution Equipment $15,000,016 D020 Padmount Replacements 2,278,256 Distribution Upgrades...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 ACE Plan and discusses the Board's directives to NS Power regarding the D005 Routine, including improving transparency in forecasting, incorporating historical storm events, and providing details on failed and damaged devices in future filings.

Section 162
1 2 The forecast for D005 for 2026 was developed based on the previous 5-year average for spend 3 from 2021-2025 plus an annual inflation of 1.80 percent. This forecast resulted in an estimated 4 8,446 person days of work at a unit cost of...

AI summary The forecast for D005 in 2026 is based on the previous 5-year average of spend from 2021-2025, factoring in 1.80% annual inflation. The forecast includes overtime labour costs due to unplanned asset failures occurring at any time, including outside normal business hours. Historical data on equipment failures is referenced, with more details to be provided in future ATO filings.

Section 163
2.04 28,066 $ 104.08 2024 51,328 $ 54.16 31,090 $ 108.32 2025 33,869 $ 56.80 30,582 $ 113.60 16 PH = Personhours 17 This value includes Actuals to the end of September 2025 and forecast for the remainder of the year. 18 19 Using the 5-year...

AI summary The text provides a forecast for the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including projected costs and actuals up to September 2025. It references a 5-year average and an annual inflation factor of 1.80 percent to estimate spending in D005 for 2026.

Section 164
REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 46: Forecast 2026 Spend in D005 Year Regular Labour Regular Labour Overtime Overtime (PH) $/PH Labour (PH) Labour $/PH 2026 40,549...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan includes a forecast of labor costs for D005, accounting for impacts from previous years' extreme events. NS Power believes the 5-year budgeting approach is reasonable for addressing cumulative effects from storm activity. The plan also includes forecasting for new customers.

Section 165
Figure 47: New Customers 2026 ACE Plan Forecast D004 New Customer Upgrades This forecast is developed based on forecasted spending levels in $19,283,936 2025 for New Customer Upgrades with an annual inflation of 1.8%. D018 Primary Equipmen...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan forecast outlines expected spending for new customer upgrades, including residential and commercial costs, based on 2025 spending levels adjusted for 1.8% annual inflation. Specific line items include distribution spare equipment and line extensions.

Section 166
unmetered services, line extensions and underground $12,328,071 services. This forecast is developed based on forecasted spending levels in 2025 with an annual inflation of 1.8%. Total New Customers $67,837,497 1 2 Joint Use 3 4 Figure 48:...

AI summary The text provides forecasts for unmetered services, line extensions, and underground services, as well as joint use activities, based on historical spending levels and an annual inflation rate of 1.8%. These forecasts are part of the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 167
am rolled out by the Province of $3,723,004 Nova Scotia. This forecast is developed based on a three-year historical average of prior spending levels with an annual inflation of 1.8%. Distribution Total $127,273,271 5 6 Distribution Right-...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan includes a forecast for Distribution Right-of-Way Widening based on historical costs and known investment levels, consistent with prior years' approaches. This follows a directive from the Board in the 2017 ACE Plan Order to use actual historical costs for vegetation management and right-of-way widening projects.

Section 173
404,118 58,444 462,562 Total Distribution Right-of-Way Widening 13,223,182 Note: Totals may be slightly off due to rounding. 1 2 Pursuant to CI 49611 - New Distribution Rights-of-Way Phase I, submitted to the Board on 3 November 1, 2016, L...

AI summary The document discusses NS Power's response to Post-Tropical Storm Arthur, including recommendations for managing overgrown distribution rights-of-way and the Board's direction to explore innovative financing options. It references a 2016 ACE Plan and a 2015 Board decision.

Section 175
1 2 In response to the Board’s concerns, and in order to further reduce the likelihood of tree contact 3 related outages like those during the PTSA event, NS Power increased the budget for the 2016 4 ACE Plan. NS Power’s 2016 ACE Plan prov...

AI summary NS Power increased the 2016 ACE Plan budget for D010 to address tree contact outages, but the Board reduced the budget to $600,000, aligning it with the 2015 ACE Plan. For the 2026 ACE Plan, New Distribution ROW spending is not included in D010, but the budget was increased to apply the new ROW width standard in existing areas.

Section 176
ribution system that already have defined ROWs. 25 Investment to establish new distribution rights-of-way where none have previously existed remains 26 with the New Distribution ROW program. 27 24 M07176, NS Power 2016 Annual Capital Expen...

AI summary The text discusses the 2026 ACE Plan, detailing capital expenditures for work vehicle replacements and transportation vehicles, including quantities, unit prices, and total forecasts. It references prior decisions and documents related to the Annual Capital Expenditure Plan.

Section 177
400 Salvage (423,000) $6,568,400 P062 Work Vehicle Replacements 27 587,140 15,852,790 Salvage (400,000) $15,452,790 P063 Class 3 Work Vehicle Replacements 4 195,000 780,000 Salvage (40,000) $740,000 Total Work Vehicles $23,178,690 4 5 Figu...

AI summary The text outlines capital expenditures related to work vehicle replacements and tools and test equipment under the 2026 ACE Plan Forecast, including costs and salvage values for various projects.

Section 178
Plan Forecast Meter Shop Tools and Equipment $50,000 Provincial Line Tools & Equipment Western Territory 175,000 North Eastern Territory 175,000 Cape Breton Territory 175,000 Central Territory 175,000 T&D Asset 550,000 System Maintenance 9...

AI summary The text outlines capital expenditure plans for tools and equipment under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including specific line items and amounts allocated for various territories and projects.

Section 179
Plan Forecast P015 Hydro Production Tools & Test Equipment $131,343 P016 Thermal Production Tools & Test Equipment POT Tools & Equipment 53,500 TUC Tools & Equipment 58,750 TRE Tools & Equipment 70,521 LIN Tools & Equipment 75,000 CT Tools...

AI summary The text outlines capital expenditure forecasts for tools and test equipment under the 2026 ACE Plan, including specific line items for Hydro and Thermal Production, as well as Mobile Radio equipment and repairs.

Section 180
23,550 Miscellaneous support for system 52,000 P025 Mobile Radio Total 224,550 P027 Telecommunication Radio & Fibre Ops HVAC & Generator Upgrades 119,000 Radio Site repairs - Miscellaneous 58,300 Add Generator Alarms and Controls 18,700 Mi...

AI summary The text provides a list of miscellaneous expenses and costs associated with various projects and operations, including mobile radio, telecommunication radio, and fibre operations. These costs are part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is marked as confidential.

Section 181
82 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) P028 Telecommunication Systems Replace & Modifications Miscellaneous teleprotection equipment upgrades (as required) 35,000 Upgrade misce...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan includes various telecommunication system upgrades and replacements, such as radio links, fiber optic equipment, network monitoring, and tower lighting, with associated costs ranging from $6,600 to $127,059 for different projects.

Section 182
55,000 Support Services for Nokia/ALU 29,920 Tower Lighting Upgrades 21,900 P028 Telecommunication Systems Replace & Modifications 852,510 Total P814 Telecommunications Spares Alcatel-Lucent MPR9500 Microwave Radio 51,000 Net Guardian Alar...

AI summary The document outlines various telecommunication systems replacement and modification costs, including support services and spare parts, totaling $1,507,721. It references the 2026 ACE Plan, which is marked as confidential and includes attachments.

Section 183
82 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 53: Computing Asset Management 2026 ACE Plan Forecast P010 SCADA Improvements This forecast is developed based on SCADA equipmen...

AI summary The text discusses the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically focusing on SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) improvements under P010, with a forecasted cost of $120,428.

Section 184
ces failures or 120,428 modifications P010 SCADA Improvements Total $120,428

AI summary The text lists a SCADA improvements project with a total cost of $120,428. It appears to be a line item in a budget or capital expenditure plan.

Section 186
30,000 Application enhancements/development 100,000 P031 NS Power IT Infrastructure Total 2,528,500 P040 DCMS Equipment Replacement CT's DCMS Equipment Replacement 21,177 POA DCMS Equipment Replacement 49,785 POT DCMS Equipment Replacement...

AI summary The text provides details on capital expenditures, including IT infrastructure and equipment replacement costs for Nova Scotia Power, and references the 2026 ACE Plan, which is marked as confidential.

Section 188
Property Improvement and Furniture P001 Building Envelope Work 25,000 Roofing & Emergency Repairs 55,000 Grading/Drainage Investigation and Repairs 96,000 Fencing Improvements 114,000 GC Work 320,000 Power Gate Installations 175,000 Asphal...

AI summary The text lists various property improvement and furniture-related expenses with associated costs, including building envelope work, roofing, grading, fencing, and office furniture, among others. These items appear to be part of a capital expenditure or infrastructure project.

Section 189
y Bank Replacements 880,000 Security Improvements 300,000 1H General Refurbishments 370,000 Property Improvement and Furniture Total $4,797,200 2 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 85 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2...

AI summary The document outlines capital expenditure items under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including bank replacements, security improvements, and property improvements, with total costs amounting to $4,797,200 and $1,440,100 respectively. These figures are part of a broader forecast for the ACE Plan.

Section 191
1 11.0 DIRECTIVES AND MISCELLANEOUS 2 3 11.1 Board ACE Plan Directives and Stakeholder Commitments 4 5 NS Power has received a number of Directives from prior ACE Plan Decisions. The Company 6 has also made a number of commitments to stake...

AI summary NS Power is aligning its 2026 ACE Plan with the Evergreen Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and the 2030 Clean Power Plan, focusing on transitioning to renewable energy and phasing out coal generation. The plan outlines sustaining capital investments for the remaining emitting fleet to ensure reliable operations.

Section 192
sions from the emitting fleet. 27 28 Figure 56 compares the capital investment forecast in the 2026 ACE Plan for NS Power’s thermal, 29 natural gas, and biomass generation units to the Evergreen IRP capital investment forecast. When 30 com...

AI summary The text compares the 2026 ACE Plan's capital investment forecast for NS Power's thermal, natural gas, and biomass generation units with the Evergreen IRP capital investment forecast, highlighting differences between a single year or subset of years in the ACE Plan and a long-term planning exercise.

Section 194
Hawkesbury Biomass $60,000,000 Pt. Tupper Pt Aconi $40,000,000 Lingan Unit 4 Lingan Unit 3 $20,000,000 Lingan Unit 2 Lingan Unit 1 $- Gas Turbines IRP ACE 10 11 12 11.1.2 Annual Rating/Prioritization of Capital Projects 13 14 In accordance...

AI summary The document outlines capital project rating criteria for NS Power, referencing the 2011 and 2013 ACE Plan Directives. It includes a visual representation of capital expenditures at various locations, such as Hawkesbury Biomass and Lingan Units, with amounts ranging from $20 million to $60 million. The text is part of the 2026 ACE Plan and is marked as confidential.

Section 195
of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Pursuant to Section 6.1 of the CEJC, NS Power’s generation, transmission and distribution capital 2 projects are rated according to...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines NS Power’s project rating methodology for capital expenditures, emphasizing health and safety, environmental compliance, business sustainability, and technical justification. Projects are rated using a matrix based on criticality and condition, resulting in a risk score from 1 to 25.

Section 198
1 Criticality and Condition values are typically influenced predominantly by the factors discussed 2 previously and assigned accordingly. However, other factors may also influence the rating of a 3 project. 4 5 Multiple influencing factors...

AI summary The document discusses how project ratings are influenced by various factors and the role of professional judgment in evaluating them. It also outlines the forecasted capital expenditures from 2026 to 2030, including sustaining capital and notable investments, while acknowledging that these projections may change due to external factors and regulatory directives.

Section 199
grity of existing assets. Notable capital projections reflect specific projects. 26 Included in these specific projects are transformative multi-year program investments and asset 27 growth. 28 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 90 of 782 REDACT...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines capital expenditures for various energy sectors in Nova Scotia, including thermal generation, hydro, wind, transmission, and distribution, with projections spanning from 2026 to 2030. The plan includes significant investments in infrastructure and general plant upgrades.

Section 200
3.2 17.2 30.1 30.0 - Distribution: Distribution R.O.W Widening 31.8 32.4 33.1 33.7 34.4 Transmission: Transmission R.O.W Widening 3.3 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ECEI - Energy Storage 44.2 (3.3) - - - ECEI - Synchronous Condenser 84.7 115.3 91.3 46.7...

AI summary The text presents capital expenditure figures across various sectors including distribution, transmission, generation, and energy storage as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. These figures highlight investments in infrastructure and energy initiatives, with specific allocations for projects such as Energy Conservation and Efficiency Initiative (ECEI) and the Wreck Cove LEM.

Section 202
1 11.1.4 Impact of Reliability Projects 2 3 The Board’s 2013 ACE Plan Decision provided the following directive: 4 5 …the Board expects NSPI to monitor the impact of the deferral of reliability 6 projects in the original 2013 ACE Plan clos...

AI summary The document outlines the Board's directives related to the impact of reliability projects in the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It emphasizes NSPI's responsibility to monitor deferrals, report on reliability performance, and align capital investments with performance standards.

Section 203
of the information set out in Section 8.1.7 29 of the 2017 ACE Plan will be reproduced in the report required by the Performance 30 Standards Decision remains to be seen. 31 26 M05339, NS Power 2013 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan, Board D...

AI summary The text references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, highlighting the need for reproducing information from the 2017 ACE Plan in a report related to the Performance Standards Decision. It also cites previous Board decisions and orders related to the Annual Capital Expenditure Plan.

Section 205
1 It is not clear such items as, for example, plans for replacement of aging 2 transmission and distribution equipment, and storm performance information, 3 beyond the 48-hour restoration metric, will be fully explored in the context of 4...

AI summary The document discusses uncertainties regarding the inclusion of reliability metrics in the ACE Plan, particularly concerning aging infrastructure and storm performance. NS Power has committed to providing risk ratings for reliability-focused distribution projects over $1 million, with updates over five years post-implementation.

Section 206
criticality and condition inputs. Specifically for distribution feeders, the criticality assessment 28 includes factors such as usage (kWh sales), regulatory consequences, customer count, redundancy, 29 and ease of access. The condition sc...

AI summary The text outlines the methodology for assessing the criticality and condition of distribution feeders, incorporating factors like usage, regulatory consequences, and customer count. It references specific regulatory decisions and documents related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan.

Section 208
1 Within the 2026 ACE Plan, the Distribution projects included for approval (as well as previously 2 identified projects in progress), and associated risk rating inputs are provided in Figure 58 below. 3 4 Figure 58: 2026 ACE Plan Distribu...

AI summary This section outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically focusing on distribution projects for approval, including their risk ratings and condition inputs. The table lists several projects with details such as criticality, load balance, outage frequency, and vegetation conditions. Some projects are still in progress, and updates to condition scores will be provided in future ACE Plans.

Section 209
uts of the condition score for these projects will be provided in subsequent ACE 10 Plans for five years following the in-service date of the project. 11 12 The Board’s Decision pertaining to the 2023 Performance standards provided the fol...

AI summary The Board has directed NS Power to prepare a comprehensive five-year reliability plan to track service improvements and progress against performance goals, to be filed by December 31, 2024. This follows the 2023 Performance Standards Report and relates to the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 211
1 2 In accordance with the Board’s directive, NS Power filed its Five-Year Reliability Plan on 3 December 20, 2024, and it was reviewed and considered as part of the 2025 ACE Plan proceeding. 4 The Board’s 2025 ACE Plan Order provided the...

AI summary NS Power submitted its Five-Year Reliability Plan, which was reviewed as part of the 2025 ACE Plan proceeding. The Board directed NS Power to provide annual updates on the plan's progress, evaluate new reliability metrics, and engage with stakeholders for a third-party review, among other actions.

Section 212
class poles across the Utility’s four operating regions, and to provide a post 24 storm evaluation to determine pole status, survival rate, impact on customer 25 outages, and whether the upgraded class improved the resilience of the 26 woo...

AI summary The document discusses the need for pole upgrades across NS Power's operating regions to enhance resilience against severe weather and climate change. It references the 2026 ACE Plan and Appendix G of the Five-Year Reliability Plan Update, which outlines reliability strategies and directives.

Section 214
1 are necessary. This approach is driven by and aligned with NS Power’s asset management strategy 2 for T&D assets and includes implementation by the Reliability team. In addition to the dedicated 3 areas of scope and responsibilities for...

AI summary The document discusses NS Power's reliability initiatives, including updates on the Reliability Team's progress and alignment with the company's asset management strategy. The Board directed NS Power to provide updates on the Reliability Director's implementation progress as part of the ACE Plan, with a focus on reducing outage frequency and duration in 2025.

Section 215
ity Team is focused on executing the projects included in the Five-Year 29 Reliability Plan with the overall goal of reducing the duration and frequency of outages 30 experienced by customers. 31 33 M11458, NS Power 2024 Annual Capital Exp...

AI summary The document references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by NS Power, which is part of the Five-Year Reliability Plan aimed at reducing outage duration and frequency. A Board Decision from August 13, 2024, is cited in relation to the 2024 ACE Plan.

Section 218
l as a discussion paper on Transmission System Resiliency ahead of a Utility Resiliency 27 Workshop taking place at the 2025 CEATI T&D conference in November 2025 (attended by NS 28 Power). The discussion paper provides the initial finding...

AI summary The text references a discussion paper on Transmission System Resiliency, prepared ahead of a 2025 CEATI T&D conference workshop attended by NS Power. It outlines initial findings, proposed deliverables, and key actions for 2026, including the development of unified definitions for resiliency terms. A related document, 'M12012, NS Power 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan, Board Order, August 19, 2025' is also cited.

Section 221
to look for 30 ways to update its risk-based asset management approach to give consideration to 31 the economic impact of outages. Therefore, the Board directs NS Power to study 32 and report on the potential use of the VoLL metric in the...

AI summary The Board directs NS Power to study and report on the potential use of the VoLL metric in its reliability investment planning and capital approvals process, citing the need to consider the economic impact of outages. References are made to Board Orders related to the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan and Storm Cost Recovery Rider.

Section 237
f 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 2023) as a trend which is expected to continue into the future. However, NS Power’s typical 2 performance compares favourably with t...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan discusses NS Power's performance in terms of outages, noting that tree contacts and failed equipment are the leading causes of customer outages. Continued investment in vegetation clearing and other capital initiatives is expected to improve system reliability and resiliency.

Section 239
2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 2 Figure 67: Annual Tree Contact – Customer Interruptions (Major/Extreme Events 3 Removed) Annual Tree Contact Customer Interruptions (Major/Extreme Removed) 350,000 300,000 250,000 200,000 1...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan includes confidential attachments and figures depicting annual tree contact-related customer interruptions and customer hours of interruption, with data from 2016 to 2025. The figures show trends in customer interruptions and hours of interruption over time, with major and extreme events removed.

Section 241
1 2 Significant amount of customer hours from non-MED days due to adverse weather in certain years, 3 such as 2021 and 2022 are not excluded above and do contribute to the volume of tree contacts 4 experienced. Despite the increased freque...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of severe weather on power outages and NS Power's efforts to improve reliability through vegetation management and equipment upgrades. Despite increased weather challenges, there is a positive trend in reducing customer impact. Investments in transmission and distribution rights-of-way are highlighted as part of the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 244
further look into the 2025 reliability data, outages caused by equipment failure can be 5 classified by device type. This is shown in Figure 71 below. 6 7 Figure 71: Customer Hours of Interruption Customer Hours of Interruption Device Type...

AI summary The document discusses outage data from October 2025, classifying customer hours of interruption by device type, with pin insulators and crossarms being the leading causes. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is marked as confidential.

Section 246
1 All distribution capital projects and routines that replace deteriorated equipment are aimed at 2 sustaining or improving system reliability and contribute to the reduction of customer impacts due 3 to device failures referenced in the t...

AI summary The document discusses NS Power's efforts to improve system reliability through capital projects and storm response, addressing the impacts of changing weather patterns and climate risks. It outlines the use of the 2.5 Beta Method for classifying storm events and highlights the current performance metrics and capital programs for 2026.

Section 247
26 Consistent with prior years, NS Power has the following capital programs for storm response and 27 reactive work for 2026: 28 29 • D008 – Provincial Storm Distribution 30 • T001 – Transmission Line Unplanned Date: December 12, 2025 Page...

AI summary NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan includes capital programs for storm response and reactive work, such as D008 and T001. The plan highlights investments in vegetation management and references routines T010 and D010, as well as work order CI C0080266. The 2025 storm performance data is compared to previous years, showing the frequency and impact of significant weather events on system performance.

Section 249
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 (Oct YTD) Significant Event Major Event Extreme Event 2 3 4 Figure 73: SAIFI- Event Class Contribution SAIFI - Event Class Contribution 4.00 System Average Outage Frequency 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 2...

AI summary The document includes a table and graph showing SAIFI (System Average Interruption Frequency Index) event class contributions from 2015 to 2025, highlighting the impact of significant, major, and extreme events on outage frequency. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is marked as confidential.

Section 250
2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 74: SAIDI – Event Class Contribution SAIDI - Event Class Contribution 80.00 System Average OUtage Duration (Hrs) 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 0.00 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019...

AI summary The text references figures 74 and 75, which provide data on SAIDI (System Average Interruption Duration Index) and details on outage causes for event days in 2025. The figures are part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan).

Section 255
1 T010 and D010 Report 2 3 In the 2016 ACE Plan Order, the Board directed as follows: 4 5 The Board approves the 2016 Routine capital expenditures, with the exception of 6 the Distribution ROW widening (D010) which is reduced to $600,000....

AI summary The document outlines progress on the T010 and D010 projects under the 2016 and 2017 ACE Plan Orders, including cost reductions, completion percentages, and forecasted expenditures. NS Power confirms that cost estimates for 2026 are based on historical data.

Section 256
st for year end 2025 30 • Forecast year end spend is approximately $3,000,000 31 • Substitutions have been made from the original plan, due to revised priorities: 39 M07176, NS Power 2016 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan, Board Order, June...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlines projected year-end spending of approximately $3,000,000, with substitutions made from the original plan due to revised priorities. References to previous ACE Plans and Board Orders are provided for context.

Section 258
1 • L-6511 was substituted by L-6002, L-6503 2 3 The following progress was made on distribution widening under D010: 4 5 • 62 percent of planned 2025 work has been completed as of October 31, 2025 6 • 80 percent completion is forecast for...

AI summary Progress on distribution widening under D010 shows 62% completion as of October 31, 2025, with 80% expected by year-end. Increased vegetation management costs are attributed to higher traffic control, labor, and expanded scope of work, including enhanced fire monitoring and targeting specific tree species to mitigate risks from wind events.

Section 259
e increase 23 in the time required to complete the additional tree removals combined with the cost increases with 24 fuel, labor, and traffic control (compared to previous years used to create the original budget) has 25 increased the aver...

AI summary The text discusses increased costs and time required for tree removal under the D010 project, leading to a reduction in the number of kilometers that can be completed within the 2025 ACE Plan budget. NS Power is exploring efficiencies and collaborating with contractors to control costs.

Section 261
1 Plans for Replacement of Aging Energy Delivery Equipment & Storm Performance 2 3 The 2015 ACE Plan Terms of Consensus included two commitments with respect to reliability: 4 5 (4) As part of the reliability directive in future ACE Plans,...

AI summary The 2015 ACE Plan Terms of Consensus required NS Power to provide more detailed information on its plans for replacing aging transmission and distribution equipment, including asset descriptions, strategic goals, and inspection data, as recommended by the SBA's consultant, Mary Neal.

Section 262
erformance 24 degradation, or other factors, and 25 • Any recent, relevant inspection data” 26 27 (5) As part of the reliability directive in future ACE Plans, NS Power will 28 provide an update on its storm performance and related capital...

AI summary The document references the 2026 ACE Plan and discusses NS Power's commitment to improving storm performance through capital investment strategies. It also mentions the Terms of Consensus approved by the Board in 2015 and NS Power's ongoing asset management practices to monitor and replace aging transmission and distribution equipment.

Section 264
1 level aimed at providing safe and reliable service, while ensuring affordability. To sustain or 2 improve reliability performance, NS Power follows its asset management principles to prioritize 3 investments in Energy Delivery equipment...

AI summary NS Power prioritizes capital investments in Energy Delivery equipment based on asset management principles, risk ratings, and asset condition to ensure safe, reliable, and affordable service. Replacement decisions are guided by asset age, performance degradation, and system reliability.

Section 265
ce is increased, the availability 23 of replacement parts or critical spares is limited, or performance is negatively impacted. This 24 information can be used to inform project prioritization. However, age profiles are used in concert 25...

AI summary The document discusses NS Power's approach to asset replacement, emphasizing the use of age profiles alongside asset condition and performance in investment decisions. It outlines the creation of a framework in 2014 to prioritize Energy Delivery assets for replacement based on risk ratings and criticality.

Section 267
455 45 10 55 8 Substation Transformer 445 50 9 60 7 10 11 Age demographics information is presently not available for all transmission and distribution asset 12 classes. Substation transformers, substation breakers, transmission conductor,...

AI summary The text discusses the lack of age demographics data for certain transmission and distribution asset classes, noting that data is available for substation transformers, substation breakers, transmission conductor, downline reclosers, and padmount transformers. It also references the 2026 ACE Plan, which is marked as confidential.

Section 268
REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 asset information improves for individual asset classes, their age profiles provide a more complete 2 picture of the current state across...

AI summary The document discusses the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, focusing on the replacement and upgrading of aging energy delivery infrastructure, particularly substation transformers. It highlights that asset age is not the sole factor in determining replacement needs, as reliability, condition, and technological advancements also play a role.

Section 270
30 20 10 0 Age Group 2 3 4 • Expected useful life of 50-60 years depending on the transformer type, utilization, and 5 environmental conditions. 6 7 • Age Demographics – 43.8 percent of Transformers are beyond 50 years of service and 28.3...

AI summary The document discusses the aging of transformers in the electrical grid, noting that 43.8% are over 50 years old and 28.3% over 60 years old. It estimates annual replacements at 7-9 units and highlights that proposed 2026 investments will increase the proportion of aging transformers. Proactive replacement strategies and programs like the transformer spares and mobile substation programs are planned.

Section 273
40 30 20 10 0 Age Group 2 3 4 • Expected useful life of 45-55 years depending on the breaker type, operations count, and 5 environmental conditions. 6 7 • Age Demographics – 39.1 percent of breakers are beyond 45 years of service and 15.0...

AI summary The text discusses the expected useful life of substation breakers, ranging from 45 to 55 years, and the current age demographics of these assets. It notes that 39.1% of breakers are beyond 45 years of service and 15.0% are beyond 55 years. The proposed capital investments in 2026 will slightly alter the age profile, with a decrease in the percentage of breakers beyond 45 years and an increase in those beyond 55 years.

Section 274
breaker spares program is planned. Figure 80 illustrates the overall change in asset age 19 profile for Substation Breakers between 2025 and 2026. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 125 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)...

AI summary The document discusses the 2026 ACE Plan, including figures that illustrate the age profile of substation breakers and transmission conductors between 2025 and 2026. It mentions a breaker spares program and provides data on asset aging for infrastructure components.

Section 276
300 200 100 0 Age Group 2 3 4 • Expected useful life of 55-65 years depending on the conductor design and environmental 5 conditions. 6 7 • Age Demographics – 36.6 percent of conductor is beyond 55 years of service and 16.3 8 percent beyon...

AI summary The document discusses the aging of transmission conductor assets, noting that 36.6% of conductor is beyond 55 years of service and 16.3% beyond 65 years. The expected useful life is 55-65 years, with a projected increase in the number of assets beyond these ages due to planned capital investments in 2026.

Section 277
Date: December 12, 2025 Page 127 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 82: Transmission Conductor Age Profile Transmission Conductor Age Profile 1000 Kilometres o...

AI summary The document presents figures related to the 2026 ACE Plan, including the transmission conductor age profile and the downline reclosers age profile, indicating the current state of infrastructure as of December 2025.

Section 278
2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 83: Downline Reclosers Age Profile (Current State) Downline Recloser Age Profile (Current State) 180 160 Number of Reclosers in Age Group 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

AI summary The document presents a figure showing the age distribution of downline reclosers in their current state, with the number of reclosers in each age group plotted on a graph.

Section 279
80 60 40 20 0 Age Group 2 3 4 • Expected useful life of 30-40 years depending on the downline recloser design, loading, 5 and environmental conditions. 6 7 • Age Demographics – 23.9 percent of Downline Reclosers are beyond 30 years of serv...

AI summary The document discusses the expected useful life of downline reclosers, their current age distribution, and the impact of planned capital investments on their age profile. It estimates annual replacement needs and highlights the continuation of a spares program to mitigate risks.

Section 280
Figure 84 below illustrates the overall change in asset age profile for Downline Reclosers 20 between 2025 and 2026. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 129 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (A...

AI summary The text presents figures illustrating the change in the age profile of Downline Reclosers between 2025 and 2026, as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It also mentions a figure showing the current state of Padmount Transformer age profiles.

Section 281
8 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 130 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 85: Padmount Transformers Age Profile (Current State) Padmount Transformer Age Profile (C...

AI summary The document presents a figure showing the age distribution of padmount transformers in their current state, with the number of transformers in each age group displayed in a bar chart. This information is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and is labeled as confidential.

Section 282
400 300 200 100 0 Age Group 2 3 4 • Expected useful life of 35-45 years depending on the padmount design, loading, and 5 environmental conditions. 6 7 • Age Demographics – 11.1 percent of padmounts are beyond 35 years of service and 2.4 8...

AI summary The text discusses the expected useful life of padmount transformers, with 11.1% beyond 35 years and 2.4% beyond 45 years. It also mentions a projected change in asset age demographics due to the 2026 ACE Plan, resulting in a slight decrease in assets over 35 years and an increase in those over 45 years.

Section 283
N REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 Figure 86: Padmount Transformer Age Profile Padmount Transformer Age Profile 900 Number of Padmounts in Age Group 800 700 2025 Age Profile 600 500 2026 Age Profile 400 300 200 100 0

AI summary The document presents a padmount transformer age profile for 2025 and 2026, showing the number of transformers in different age groups. This data is likely used for planning capital expenditures and infrastructure upgrades.

Section 284
400 300 200 100 0 Age Group 2 3 4 11.1.5 Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) 5 6 The Board’s letter dated July 8, 2025 pertaining to its inquiry into NS Power’s Property and Assets 7 provided the following directive: 8 9 The Board direc...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) has directed NS Power to annually confirm and file revisions to its Strategic Asset Management Plan (SAMP) in the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan filings. A minor revision to the SAMP is expected by December 31, 2026, and a formal review is required by December 31, 2029.

Section 286
1 11.1.6 CIS Replacement Project – Status Update 2 3 The Board’s letter dated October 1, 2025 pertaining to a customer DRO appeal provided the 4 following directive: 5 6 NS Power is directed to include specific updates about its Customer I...

AI summary The NSEB has directed NS Power to include updates on the CIS Replacement Project in its Annual Capital Expenditure filings until the project is completed. The current CIS, installed in 1997, is no longer supported and poses significant technological risks despite recent upgrades.

Section 287
delivering customer care, billing and communications 27 to customers. CIS needs to be replaced in order to address the risks associated with 28 the existing software and to continue to deliver bills and serve customers reliably. 29 30 In a...

AI summary NS Power plans to replace the Customer Information System (CIS) to address risks with the current software and support new tariff designs like Time of Use and Critical Peak Pricing. A ransomware attack discovered in April 2025 may influence the project's direction and timeline, which has been temporarily paused. The CIS Replacement project application is planned for 2026, with the new system expected to launch in 2029.

Section 288
e launch of the new CIS system anticipated in 2029. 14 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 134 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 11.2 2026 Capital Spending by Justification...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines capital spending by justification criteria, including health and safety, environment, land and right-of-way, and various energy generation and transmission projects, with specific allocations and carryover amounts.

Section 289
Transmission Plant 233.9 11.1 22.0 1.3 117.3 82.1 Distribution System 185.4 20.2 136.6 11.5 2.8 14.3 Metering Equipment 4.2 - 3.9 - - 0.3 Work Support Facilities 22.5 1.2 9.1 1.6 1.2 9.4 Information Technology Application and 45.0 - 4.3 7....

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan contains confidential information and includes details on capital expenditures across various categories such as transmission, distribution, metering, and information technology. The document outlines financial figures and justifications for these expenditures.

Section 290
TED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 11.3 2026 Capital Spending by Justification Sub-Criteria 2 3 Figure 88 below provides 2026 capital spending by justification sub-criteria. 4 5...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines capital spending by justification sub-criteria, including distribution system requirements, outage performance, joint use agreements, and work support facilities. The table provides details on budget, approval, routine spend, and carryover for each category.

Section 291
4.9 0.9 - - Telecontrol & 6.4 0.9 1.5 0.5 - 3.5 Telecommunications Other Work Support Facilities 10.2 0.3 2.7 0.2 1.2 5.9 Total $22.5 $1.2 $9.1 $1.6 $1.2 $9.4 Note: Figures presented may include $0.1M in rounding differences on some line i...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan uses the Board's approved AFUDC rate of 6.65%, effective April 1, 2025, as directed in the Board’s WACC and AFUDC Order dated March 31, 2025. The document also outlines O/H rates for Generation, Customer Operations, and Shared Services.

Section 292
UDC Application, Board Order, March 31, 2025. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 137 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 1 11.5 2026 Depreciation Rates 2 3 Figure 89: 2026 Dep...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 depreciation rates for various power generation facilities in Nova Scotia, including Lingan, Point Aconi, Point Tupper, and Trenton. These rates are presented in Figure 89 and are part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

Section 294
25 Page 138 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 2026 Hydro Production Plant Avon 3.02% Bear River 1.80% Black River 2.04% Dickie Brook 3.16% Fall River 1.82% Harmony 4.5...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlines the projected contribution of various hydro production plants in Nova Scotia, including specific percentages for each facility and the overall total hydro production contribution.

Section 299
2026 ACE Plan CONFIDENTIAL (Attachments Only) 2026 General Plant Land Rights - General Plant 1.93% Structures & improvements 2.85% Office Furniture & Equipment 9.26% Office Furniture & Equip - Comp Hardware 20.00% Office Furniture & Equip...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines capital expenditures for various projects, including General Plant, Smart Grid, and Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) initiatives. The plan details percentages allocated to different categories such as office furniture, transportation equipment, and solar generation.

Section 300
6.67% Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) Project Battery Storage Systems 5.00% 1 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 141 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0080206 Page 1 of 5 CI Number: C0080206 Title: P...

AI summary The document outlines the refurbishment of the Point Aconi Boiler in 2026, including the replacement of critical components to ensure environmental compliance, safe operation, and efficiency. The project is part of the 2026 ACE Plan and is subject to the Board's directive on the Decarbonization Deferral Account (M11220).

Section 301
fications, and the Nova Scotia Labour and Advanced Education Regulations. The Board provided the following Directive in its Decision pertaining to the Decarbonization Deferral Account (DDA) (M11220): NS Power must provide specific notice t...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) directed NS Power to provide notice to all participants in the Decarbonization Deferral Account (DDA) proceeding upon filing any future capital work order applications involving assets forecasted to be included in the DDA. NS Power complied with this directive by notifying participants on December 3, 2025. The summary also includes related capital investment (CI) projects for steam production plant assets over several years, with depreciation class and estimated asset life provided.

Section 302
oiler Refractory Replacement 2027 - $TBD • 2028 – TBD POA Boiler Refractory Replacement 2028 - $TBD Depreciation Class: Steam Production Plant – Point Aconi Estimated Life of the Asset: 8 Years Retirement Information: • Categorization of R...

AI summary The document outlines the planned refractory replacement projects for boilers at Point Aconi, with estimated costs to be determined, and provides depreciation class and retirement information for the steam production plant. The justification for the 2026 ACE Plan is based on thermal criteria, specifically equipment replacement and refurbishment.

Section 305
t in operational inefficiencies. This refurbishment is supported by detailed inspections, which have identified this work as essential to sustaining reliable boiler performance. Contingency Statement Contingency for this project has been d...

AI summary The text discusses the necessity of a boiler refurbishment project due to operational inefficiencies, supported by detailed inspections. A 10% contingency has been allocated for unforeseen risks such as material price increases and unexpected damage discovered during the refurbishment process.

Section 306
2026 ACE Plan C0080206 Page 3 of 5 Capital Project Detailed Estimate Location: Steam CI# : C0080206 Title: POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 Execution Year: 2026 Cost Support Completed Similar Description Unit Quantity Unit Estimate Total Esti...

AI summary The document provides a detailed estimate for the 2026 ACE Plan, specifically for the POA Boiler Refurbishment project. It lists various labor categories, their quantities, unit estimates, and total estimates, along with references to similar completed projects.

Section 311
e of salaries across a variety of jobs within similar classifications including fringe, and are used solely for budgeting purposes. Note 2: Small differences in totals are attributable to rounding. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 144 of 782 R...

AI summary The document provides a checklist and maturity matrix for estimating project costs related to the POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 project under the 2026 ACE Plan. It outlines the classification of estimates and the maturity level of project definition deliverables.

Section 318
5 33 38 36 33 this Project % Defined/Complete 100% 100% 88% 88% 84% towards Class Estimate Comments: This project is being filed as a Class 3 estimate. The defined deliverables for this project indicate that 88% of Class 3 deliverables are...

AI summary The project is filed as a Class 3 estimate with 88% of deliverables completed. A 10% contingency is included to account for risks such as material cost increases and unforeseen scope changes during refurbishment. The project relates to boiler refractory replacement at the Power Operations Area (POA) in 2026.

Section 320
82 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0080205 Page 2 of 6 The scope of this project includes the staging and preparation of both cyclones for internal inspection thorough visual and thermographic (if possib...

AI summary The text discusses the scope of a project involving refractory material replacement and inspection for cyclones, as well as NS Power's compliance with a Board directive regarding the Decarbonization Deferral Account (DDA) by notifying participants on December 3, 2025.

Section 324
shment; additional scope may be identified during demolition and inspection phases, when previously inaccessible areas of the boiler are exposed and assessed for unforeseen damage or deterioration. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 149 of 782 R...

AI summary The document outlines a capital project for the replacement of refractory materials in a boiler at the Power Operations Area (POA) in 2026, including labor costs and references to similar projects. The project involves engineering, maintenance, and utility work, with detailed cost estimates provided.

Section 335
100% 100% 80% 80% 73% towards Class Estimate Comments: This project is being filed as a Class 3 estimate. The defined deliverables for this project indicate that 80% of Class 3 deliverables are completed. A contingency value of 10% was sel...

AI summary The TUC Shoreline Sheetpile Refurbishment project involves installing an 80-meter sloped rock revetment to address deteriorated steel sheet pile structures at the Tufts Cove Generating Station. The project is part of the 2026 ACE Plan with a forecast cost of $5,691,466, and a contingency of 10% has been included to account for risks such as material cost volatility and potential scope changes.

Section 336
condition of the existing steel sheet pile structures that retain the plant shoreline. An extension will also be required for the unit 3 seawater cooling intake to accommodate the shoreline extension. Summary of Related CIs +/- 2 years: Pu...

AI summary This project is necessary due to the deteriorated condition of the existing sheet pile structures, identified by a third-party engineering consultant. Corrosion in both splash and low water zones has compromised structural integrity, requiring immediate intervention to prevent serious risks to stability and safety.

Section 337
of the cells below the mid- tide zone where capacity is compromised. Without intervention, the continued deterioration poses serious risks to structural stability and safety. Why do this project now? A condition assessment of the existing...

AI summary This project aims to remediate a deteriorating steel sheet pile structure to prevent structural failure, environmental incidents, and damage to adjacent infrastructure. A condition assessment in 2022 confirmed the need for intervention, and detailed design was finalized in mid-2025. Permitting discussions have begun to streamline approvals.

Section 340
option but had the potential to only last 15 to 20 years, requiring either major maintenance or full rehabilitation at that time. Contingency Statement Contingency for this project has been determined using a combination of internal subjec...

AI summary The document discusses a project with a 15-year lifespan, requiring major maintenance or rehabilitation. Contingency planning includes 15% for execution risks, environmental precautions, and regulatory feedback from authorities like the Department of Fisheries and Transport Canada.

Section 349
Project 4 24 20 18 17 % Defined/Complete 100% 100% 80% 72% 68% Percentage towards Class Estimate Comments: This project is being filed as a Class 3 estimate. The defined deliverables for this project indicate that 80% of Class 3 deliverabl...

AI summary This document outlines a Class 3 estimate for a project, indicating that 80% of deliverables are completed. A 15% contingency is included to cover execution risks, market changes, and feedback from governing authorities such as the Department of Fisheries and Transport Canada.

Section 361
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 11 of 34 C. Lebans Page 11 conservative assumptions have been made in the conceptual design. It is recommended to complete a geotechnical investigation pr...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 discusses conservative assumptions in the conceptual design of a project involving steel sheet piles (SSP) and combi-wall structures. It recommends a geotechnical investigation during the detailed design phase to reduce uncertainty and potentially lower costs by adjusting design parameters based on findings.

Section 363
2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 12 of 34 C. Lebans Page 12 Figure 11 - Option 1 TUC3 Intake Extension In summary, this option would provide a brand-new structure that will have a service life of 50 years, with minimal maintenance...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan discusses two options for infrastructure improvements: Option 1 involves a new structure with a 50-year service life but may require additional regulatory steps due to seabed encroachment. Option 2 proposes a concrete retaining wall and partial cell encapsulation to minimize operational disruption.

Section 367
rial and to select durable rock types to meet these requirements. It is expected that the majority of required maintenance may involve “topping up” or replacing displaced rocks following storm events. The TUC3 cold-water intake is extended...

AI summary The document discusses three options for extending the TUC3 cold-water intake, focusing on design differences and associated costs. Option 3, a rock revetment, is the least expensive, while Option 1, a Combi-Wall, is the most costly. The costs include design and construction contingencies.

Section 368
Option 1 – Combi-Wall $6,260,000 Option 2 – Retaining Wall $1,995,000 Option 3 – Rock Revetment $1,730,000 Page 17 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 174 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachme...

AI summary The document presents three options for a project, each with associated costs, and outlines a scoring methodology based on four weighted criteria to evaluate the options. The criteria include meeting design requirements, impact on operations, environmental considerations, and probable costs.

Section 369
option partially meets the criterion requirements. ➢ A score of 1 indicates that the option vaguely meets the criterion requirements. The final scoring tables for each option are detailed below: Table 3 - Option 1 Weighted Scoring Option 1...

AI summary The document evaluates an option (COMBI-WALL) against various criteria, assigning scores and weighted scores. The total weighted score is 195, with a possible maximum of 300, resulting in a total score of 65%. The evaluation includes design, operational impacts, regulatory considerations, and probable costs.

Section 370
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 19 of 34 C. Lebans Page 19 Table 4 - Option 2 Weighted Scoring Option 2 – RETAINING WALL Criterion Score Weight (%) Weighted Score Meet Design Criteria 1...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan evaluates three options for a retaining wall and rock revetment, scoring them based on design criteria, operational impacts, regulatory considerations, and probable costs. Option 2 scored 67%, and Option 3 scored 78%, with Option 1 performing poorly due to high capital costs and large seabed area requirements.

Section 371
core (%) 78 Option 1 scored strongly in “Meets Design Criteria”, however scored poorly in the remaining criteria, primarily due to the large amount of seabed area required and high capital costs. Option 2 scored strongly in all but “Meets...

AI summary Three options were evaluated for a coastal infrastructure project. Option 1 scored well on design criteria but had high capital costs. Option 2 scored well overall but relied on existing infrastructure that may require extensive maintenance. Option 3, a rock revetment, scored highest with low costs and meeting design criteria, and is recommended by CBCL.

Section 372
CTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 20 of 34 C. Lebans Page 20 The next step is to gather information to develop a more detailed understanding of site conditions and to validate design assumptio...

AI summary The document outlines the next steps in the 2026 ACE Plan for the Tufts Cove SSP wall, including geotechnical programs, surveys, regulatory roadmaps, and coastal studies to assess sea level rise impacts. CBCL Limited submits their Options Analysis report and invites further inquiries.

Section 373
r reliance on its content by third parties is the responsibility of the third party. CBCL Limited accepts no responsibility for any damages suffered as a result of third-party use of this document. Page 20 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 177...

AI summary The document provides appendices containing historical and concept drawings related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) under contract C0021608. These documents are redacted and marked as confidential.

Section 374
2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 24 of 34 NORTH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A ISSUED FOR REVIEW MAR 9/23 JEF No. Description Date By NSPI

AI summary The text provides a page reference from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically Attachment 1, Page 24 of 34, with the note 'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION' and a reference to 'NSPI' (Nova Scotia Power Incorporated).

Section 380
2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 25 of 34 NORTH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A ISSUED FOR REVIEW MAR 9/23 JEF No. Description Date By NSPI

AI summary The text references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and includes a contract number (C0021608) with an attachment page reference. It contains a note indicating that the document is not for construction and was issued for review on March 9, 2023, by JEF. The entity 'NSPI' is mentioned, likely referring to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated.

Section 386
CBCL-610x914 TITLE SHEET (ARCH D) Date: December 12, 2025 Page 182 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 26 of 34 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

AI summary The document is a technical attachment from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, referencing contract number C0021608. It includes a title sheet and a page from an attachment, with a note that the content is redacted and not for construction use.

Section 399
Drawing No DRAWING NAME: Y:\HALIFAX\DATA\PROJECTS\2022\220322.00 NSPI TUFTS COVE SSP WALL\44 CAD\03 STRUCT\220322.00-MSK04.DWG LAYOUT NAME: OPTION 2 - NEW RETAINING WALL PLOT DATE: Thursday, March 9, 2023 11:12:16 AM CAD OPERATOR: LULI MSK...

AI summary The text appears to be a technical drawing and related documentation for a construction project, specifically a retaining wall at Tufts Cove, associated with the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) and contract number C0021608. The document is labeled as confidential and partially redacted.

Section 400
2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 28 of 34 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A ISSUED FOR REVIEW MAR 9/23 JEF No. Description Date By NSPI

AI summary This document is an attachment to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically contract C0021608, and is marked 'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION' and 'ISSUED FOR REVIEW.' It includes a page number and date, indicating it is part of a larger document under review.

Section 405
Drawing No DRAWING NAME: Y:\HALIFAX\DATA\PROJECTS\2022\220322.00 NSPI TUFTS COVE SSP WALL\44 CAD\03 STRUCT\220322.00-MSK05.DWG LAYOUT NAME: OPTION 2 - ELEVATION AND SECTIONS PLOT DATE: Thursday, March 9, 2023 11:12:23 AM CAD OPERATOR: LULI...

AI summary The text includes a drawing name and layout details for a project related to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) at Tufts Cove, as well as a reference to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan with attachment details. The content is partially redacted and includes confidential information.

Section 406
2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 29 of 34 NORTH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A ISSUED FOR REVIEW MAR 9/23 JEF No. Description Date By NSPI

AI summary The document references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically Attachment 1, Page 29 of 34, which includes a note indicating that the document is not for construction and was issued for review on March 9, 2023, by JEF. The attachment is associated with Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI).

Section 411
Drawing No DRAWING NAME: Y:\HALIFAX\DATA\PROJECTS\2022\220322.00 NSPI TUFTS COVE SSP WALL\44 CAD\03 STRUCT\220322.00-MSK06.DWG LAYOUT NAME: OPTION 3 - NEW ROCK REVETMENT PLOT DATE: Thursday, March 9, 2023 11:12:25 AM CAD OPERATOR: LULI MSK...

AI summary The text includes a drawing name, layout name, and plot date related to a project involving a new rock revetment at Tufts Cove, as well as a reference to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and a contract number (C0021608). The document appears to be a technical drawing or planning document.

Section 412
2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 30 of 34 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION A ISSUED FOR REVIEW MAR 9/23 JEF No. Description Date By NSPI

AI summary This document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically Attachment 1, page 30 of 34. It is marked 'NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION' and 'ISSUED FOR REVIEW' on March 9, 2023, by JEF. The document is associated with contract number C0021608 and is related to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI).

Section 417
Drawing No DRAWING NAME: Y:\HALIFAX\DATA\PROJECTS\2022\220322.00 NSPI TUFTS COVE SSP WALL\44 CAD\03 STRUCT\220322.00-MSK07.DWG LAYOUT NAME: OPTION 3 - ELEVATION AND SECTIONS PLOT DATE: Thursday, March 9, 2023 11:12:28 AM CAD OPERATOR: LULI...

AI summary The document contains a redacted section of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically Attachment 1, which includes an Opinion of Probable Costs (OPC) related to Contract Number C0021608. The content is confidential and partially redacted.

Section 418
DENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 32 of 34 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST DATE: 03 09 2023 TUFTS COVE SSP WALL REPAIR CBCL FILE No.: 220322.00 Nova Scotia Power PREPARED BY: CE REVIEWED BY: JF / G...

AI summary The document presents an opinion of probable construction cost for the Tufts Cove SSP Wall Repair project, estimating mobilization, insurance, bonds, permits, and pre-construction management costs at $500,000. The project is part of the 2026 ACE Plan and is associated with contract number C0021608.

Section 419
500,000 a. Mobilization, Insurance, Bonds, Permits, Pre-Construction Management LS 1 $ 500,000 $ 500,000 - 2.0 DEMOLITION & TEMPORARY SUPPORTS LS 1 $ 170,000 a. Remove Top of Cells & Temporarily Support Piping LS 1 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 b. T...

AI summary The text outlines costs associated with mobilization, insurance, bonds, permits, and pre-construction management, totaling $500,000. It also includes costs for demolition and temporary supports, such as removing the top of cells and temporarily supporting piping, with a total of $170,000 allocated for these activities.

Section 420
60,000 $ 60,000 c. Temporary Rerouting of Bridge Piping LS Not Included 3.0 COMBI-WALL LS 1 $ 2,890,000 a. Supply of Pipe and Sheet Piles T 190 $ 3,100 $ 589,000 b. Supply of Tie-Rods & Walers T 12 $ 3,000 $ 36,000 c. Install of Combi-Wall...

AI summary The text outlines various line items and costs associated with infrastructure projects, including temporary rerouting of bridge piping, COMBI-WALL installation, and design development contingency allowances. These details are presented in a tabular format with cost breakdowns for each component.

Section 421
5.0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE - Note 1 LS 40% $ 1,500,000 SUB-TOTAL - DIRECT & INDIRECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 5,060,000 6.0 ENGINEERING, INVESTIGATION AND CONSTRUCTION ALLOWANCES a. Engineering, Project Management and Constru...

AI summary The document outlines various cost allowances and contingencies for a project, including a design development contingency allowance, engineering and construction oversight costs, environmental surveys, geotechnical investigations, and a construction contingency. Total direct and indirect construction costs with contingency are estimated at $6,260,000.

Section 422
TOTAL - DIRECT & INDIRECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS with CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY $ 6,260,000 THIS OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS IS PRESENTED ON THE BASIS OF EXPERIENCE, QUALIFICATIONS, AND BEST JUDGEMENT. IT HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCE...

AI summary The document outlines total construction costs, including direct and indirect expenses with a construction contingency of $6,260,000. It explains the basis for the Opinion of Probable Costs and defines various budget classes and contingency allowances, such as Design Development Contingency, Construction Contingency, Escalation/Inflation allowance, and Location Factor.

Section 423
arket conditions. This estimate should be sufficient for making correct investment decisions and obtaining preliminary project approval. Design development is typically in the order of 25% complete. A Class "B" Budget is based on prelimina...

AI summary The text describes three types of project budgets (Class 'B' and 'A') based on design development stages and their use in investment decisions and project approvals. It outlines the level of detail and completeness required for each class of budget.

Section 424
RMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 33 of 34 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST DATE: 03 09 2023 TUFTS COVE SSP WALL REPAIR CBCL FILE No.: 220322.00 Nova Scotia Power PREPARED BY: CE REVIEWED BY: JF / GP EST. DESCR...

AI summary The document provides an opinion of probable construction costs for the Tufts Cove SSP wall repair project under the 2026 ACE Plan. The estimated mobilization, insurance, bonds, permits, and pre-construction management costs are listed at $160,000.

Section 425
a. Mobilization, Insurance, Bonds, Permits, Pre-Construction Management LS 1 $ 160,000 $ 160,000 - 2.0 DEMOLITION & TEMPORARY SUPPORTS LS 1 $ 170,000 a. Remove Top of Cells & Temporarily Support Piping LS 1 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 b. Temporari...

AI summary The document outlines various costs associated with mobilization, demolition, temporary supports, and retaining wall construction, including specific line items and their respective amounts.

Section 426
000 c. Retaining Wall LS 1 $ 400,000 $ 400,000 4.0 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE - Note 1 40% $ 440,000 SUB-TOTAL - DIRECT & INDIRECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS $ 1,540,000 5.0 ENGINEERING, INVESTIGATION AND CONSTRUCTION ALLOWANCES a. E...

AI summary The text outlines construction costs and allowances, including a retaining wall, design development contingency, and various engineering and surveying costs. It provides a breakdown of direct and indirect construction costs and includes percentages and amounts for different categories.

Section 427
000 d. Geotechnical Investigations Ea. 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 6.0 Construction Contingency - Note 2 10% $ 200,000 7.0 Escalation ( Based on 2023 Dollars) - Note 3 0% Not Included 8.0 Location Factor - Note 4 0% Included in Units TOTAL - DIREC...

AI summary The document outlines the estimated costs for geotechnical investigations and includes a construction contingency of 10% amounting to $200,000. The total direct and indirect construction costs with the contingency are estimated at $1,995,000. The opinion of probable costs is based on experience and best judgment, and potential variations due to market trends and unforeseen adjustments are noted.

Section 429
rket conditions. This estimate should be sufficient for making correct investment decisions and obtaining preliminary project approval. Design development is typically in the order of 25% complete. A Class "B" Budget is based on preliminar...

AI summary The text discusses different classes of project budgets (Class 'B' and Class 'A') in the context of investment decisions and project approval stages. It outlines the level of design development and completeness of specifications for each class, as well as the purpose and use of each type of budget.

Section 430
NTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0021608 Attachment 1 Page 34 of 34 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST DATE: 03 09 2023 TUFTS COVE SSP WALL REPAIR CBCL FILE No.: 220322.00 Nova Scotia Power PREPARED BY: CE REVIEWED BY: JF / GP...

AI summary The document provides an opinion of probable construction cost for the Tufts Cove SSP Wall Repair project under the 2026 ACE Plan, with an estimated mobilization, insurance, bonds, and pre-construction management cost of $130,000.

Section 431
130,000 a. Mobilization, Insurance, Bonds, Permits, Pre-Construction Management LS 1 $ 130,000.00 $ 130,000 2.0 DEMOLITION & TEMPORARY SUPPORTS LS 1 $ 170,000 a. Remove Top of Cells & Temporarily Support Piping LS 1 $ 110,000 $ 110,000 b....

AI summary The document outlines various costs associated with a project, including mobilization, demolition, rock revetment, and contingency allowances. It provides detailed line items with quantities and associated costs, such as $130,000 for mobilization and $610,000 for rock revetment.

Section 433
TOTAL - DIRECT & INDIRECT CONSTRUCTION COSTS with CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY $ 1,730,000 THIS OPINION OF PROBABLE COSTS IS PRESENTED ON THE BASIS OF EXPERIENCE, QUALIFICATIONS, AND BEST JUDGEMENT. IT HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCE...

AI summary This document presents an opinion of probable costs for a project, including direct and indirect construction costs with a construction contingency. It outlines the basis for the estimate and defines different budget classes, such as Class 'D' and Class 'C', which are used to screen alternative solutions and make investment decisions.

Section 434
arket conditions. This estimate should be sufficient for making correct investment decisions and obtaining preliminary project approval. Design development is typically in the order of 25% complete. A Class "B" Budget is based on prelimina...

AI summary The text discusses different classes of project budgets (Class B and Class A) and their associated levels of design development. It also references a confidential attachment from the 2026 ACE Plan and a specific project titled 'TUC1 IP LP Last Stage Blade Replacement'.

Section 435
REMOVED) REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0068898 Page 1 of 5 CI Number: C0068898 Title: TUC1 IP LP Last Stage Blade Replacement Start Date: 2025/05 In-Service Date: 2026/06 Final Cost Date: 2026/12 Function: Steam Forecast Amount: $5,215,861 DESCR...

AI summary This project involves the replacement of L-0 blades on the Tufts Cove Unit 1 turbines to ensure safe and reliable operation. The blades are subject to erosion and fatigue, and the project is justified under the Thermal Equipment Refurbishment/Replacement sub-criteria. The estimated cost is $5,215,861, with a projected in-service date of 2026/06.

Section 436
tirement and disposal of Capital Assets • Percentage of Asset Pool: 5.33% JUSTIFICATION: Justification Criteria: Thermal Sub Criteria: Equipment Refurbishment/Replacement Why do this project? During the planned inspection of the Tufts Cove...

AI summary The project involves replacing cracked L-0 blades in the Tufts Cove Unit 1 turbine to prevent catastrophic damage and ensure operational readiness. Replacement blades were ordered in May 2025 and are scheduled for delivery in November 2025, with replacement planned for 2026.

Section 437
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0068898 Page 2 of 5 Why do this project this way? Replacement of the Tufts Cove Unit 1 L-0 blades is the best option for continued reliability of Tufts Cove Unit 1 as the...

AI summary The document discusses the replacement of Tufts Cove Unit 1 L-0 blades due to cracks, emphasizing the need for full replacement over partial refurbishment for long-term reliability. A 10% contingency is applied based on internal expertise and previous projects.

Section 444
Not Applicable (NA) NR NR Instrumentation/Control System Discipline Drawings Not Applicable (NA) NR NR Mechanical Discipline Drawings Not Applicable (NA) NR NR Total # Deliverables for 3 15 13 12 12 this Project % Defined/Complete 100% 100...

AI summary The text discusses a Class 3 estimate for a project, noting that 87% of deliverables are complete, with a 10% contingency selected to account for execution risks such as technical field advisor costs, labor, and contract support. The document is part of the 2026 ACE Plan and includes redacted information.

Section 445
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0068898 Page 5 of 5 Legend: Inclusions Date: December 12, 2025 Page 199 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Date: December 12, 2025 Page 200 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION...

AI summary The document contains a proposal from EthosEnergy Canada, Ltd to Nova Scotia Power for the removal and replacement of blading for LP1, LP2, and LP3 with original design at Tufts Cove Unit 1.

Section 452
ed components o EthosEnergy upgraded steam path in most OEM steam turbines globally o Provide upgrades and performance guarantees o Improvement over existing OEM designs • EthosEnergy Parts are High Quality, Intentionally o ISO 9001 / 1400...

AI summary EthosEnergy proposes to manufacture new L-0 blades for LP1, LP2, and LP3, including installation hardware. The proposal emphasizes high-quality manufacturing processes, compliance with ISO standards, and performance guarantees. EthosEnergy also assumes that NSP has a partial set of L-0 blades for LP1 in inventory.

Section 453
re • EthosEnergy assumes NSP has a ½ set of L-0 blades for LP1 in inventory. EthosEnergy’s scope of supply will include for one L-0 set each for LP2 & LP3, and a ½ set for LP1. • Expedited Manufacturing lead time for two and a half sets is...

AI summary The text outlines the scope of supply, manufacturing lead times, and inspection processes for blade replacements at NSP. EthosEnergy will provide blade sets, installation kits, and perform inspections, with specific timelines and procedures.

Section 457
Total Price Delivery (3.1) Manufacture New L-0 Blades & Hardware 15 – 16 Weeks - LP2 Full Set, LP3 Full Set, LP1 Half Set (3.2) L-0 Blade Installation Kit for Three Rows 10 – 12 Weeks (3.3- 3.4) IP/LP & DFLP Rotor Inspections; Remove & 46...

AI summary The document outlines the timeline and scope for the manufacture and installation of L-0 blades and hardware, as well as inspection and replacement activities. It also includes pricing assumptions and clarifications regarding metal supply volatility and quote validity.

Section 463
6.6 Contracting Entity Purchase order shall be issued to: EthosEnergy Canada, Ltd. 3100 South Sam Houston Parkway East Houston, TX 77047 www.ethosenergy.com 6.7 Terms and Conditions EthosEnergy has attached a copy of our standard terms and...

AI summary The document outlines a contract with EthosEnergy Canada, Ltd. for the TUC2 Stack Coating and Structural Refurbishment project at the Tufts Cove Generating Station. The project involves removing existing coatings, repairing concrete cracks, and applying a two-layer epoxy coating system to extend the asset's life.

Section 464
e external stack column, and the application of a two-layer epoxy coating system to Unit 2 of the Tufts Cove Generating Station (TUC) concrete chimney stack to restore integrity and extend asset life. The stacks at Tufts Cove Generating St...

AI summary This document discusses the refurbishment of the TUC 2 stack column at Tufts Cove Generating Station, including the application of a two-layer epoxy coating system. The project is justified based on findings from a 2024 inspection that revealed extensive cracking in the stack, necessitating repairs to restore integrity and extend asset life. The asset is classified under the Steam Production Plant – Tufts Cove 2 depreciation class with an estimated life of 25 years.

Section 467
re not ideal for coating the stack or completing concrete refurbishment work could also lead to increased costs due to rework. Delays due to weather will also increase the cost of equipment rentals. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 219 of 782...

AI summary The text discusses potential cost increases due to delays in coating the stack and concrete refurbishment work, as well as delays caused by weather, leading to higher equipment rental costs. It also references a 2026 ACE Plan with a contract number and document instructions.

Section 476
100% 100% 72% 72% 61% Percentage towards Class Estimate Comments: This project is being filed as a Class 3 estimate. The defined deliverables for this project indicate that 72% of Class 3 deliverables are completed. A contingency value of...

AI summary The document outlines a Class 3 estimate for a project with 72% of deliverables completed. A 20% contingency was applied to cover contractor cost risks. The text includes a redacted inspection report for Unit #2 at Tufts Cove Generating Station, submitted as part of the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 479
ACE Plan C0080134 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 45 NSPI 4 Tufts Cove Generating station. Unit # 2 Job number 2924 II. DESCRIPTION

AI summary This document is an attachment to the ACE Plan C0080134, related to the Tufts Cove Generating Station, Unit #2, with job number 2924. It provides a description of the project.

Section 481
fety cable from elevation 0’-0” to elevation 492’-0” Platforms: Four (4) interior platforms (annular space) locations. One (1) 360° CEMS platform at elevation 125’-0”; one (1) partial 180° AOL balcony at elevation 240’-0”; One (1) par- tia...

AI summary This document describes the structural and technical specifications of the Tufts Cove Generating Station Unit #2, including platform locations, breeching ducts, LPS cables, AOL obstruction lights, and access doors. It is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) under contract number C0080134.

Section 482
2026 ACE Plan C0080134 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 45 NSPI 5 Tufts Cove Generating station. Unit # 2 Job number 2924 III Inspection Findings & Recommendations: Exterior Concrete Column North, East, Southwest Inspection Drops:

AI summary The text references an inspection of the exterior concrete columns at the Tufts Cove Generating Station, Unit #2, as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It includes job number 2924 and mentions inspection findings and recommendations.

Section 486
Elevation 190’ large spalled area at cold joint. Elevations 334’/338’ exposed reinforcing steel spalls cracks open cold joints, elevation 356’ open cold joint and exposed reinforcing steel. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 227 of 782 REDACTED...

AI summary The text describes inspection findings at the Tufts Cove Generating Station, Unit #2, noting issues such as large spalled areas, exposed reinforcing steel, and open cold joints at various elevations on concrete columns. The findings are part of the 2026 ACE Plan and are detailed in Attachment 1 of document C0080134.

Section 489
430 southwest a core sample was taken with the hole filled with none shrink grout. Elevation 452’ core sample, please note that the sample was cracked throughout its full length. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 228 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (C...

AI summary A core sample from a structure at Tufts Cove Generating Station Unit #2 was analyzed, revealing cracks throughout its full length. Repair recommendations were categorized based on severity, with Category 1 requiring immediate attention, Category 2 needing repairs within two years, and Category 3 requiring long-term repairs within five years.

Section 492
e feel free to contact us at any time. Mark Lambert: Phone (647) 773-3763 [email protected] Trevor Grondin: Phone (250) 213-2834 [email protected] Date: December 12, 2025 Page 230 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED...

AI summary The document contains a redacted section of a 2026 ACE Plan attachment, discussing a major crack identified at the Tufts Cove Generating Station, Unit #2, job number 2924. The crack is located approximately 85' north and is described as a large open crack at a cold joint with hollow concrete along the open joint.

Section 493
2026 ACE Plan C0080134 Attachment 1 Page 11 of 45 NSPI 11 Tufts Cove Generating station. Unit # 2 Job number 2924 3. LED obstruction light only one unit working 4. Major crack continues up the concrete column. The crack has been patched in...

AI summary The text contains pages from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically Attachment 1, related to Tufts Cove Generating Station Unit #2, job number 2924. It includes details such as a malfunctioning LED obstruction light, a major crack in a concrete column, and core sample holes at elevation 230' filled with grout.

Section 494
2026 ACE Plan C0080134 Attachment 1 Page 13 of 45 NSPI 13 Tufts Cove Generating station. Unit # 2 Job number 2924 7. Elevation 247’-6” north, hori- zontal crack at cold joint approx. 14’ in length 8. Elevation 308’ exposed damp concrete at...

AI summary The document provides details on structural issues at the Tufts Cove Generating Station Unit #2, including cracks, spalling, and moisture intrusion at cold joints, with specific elevations and locations noted.

Section 495
and aggregate. 10. Vertical hairline crake runs parallel to the larger crack, horizontal crack follows the cold joint, spalled area at cold joint should be repaired. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 236 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL I...

AI summary The document describes structural issues at the Tufts Cove Generating Station, Unit #2, including hairline cracks, horizontal cracking at cold joints, and hollow-sounding concrete, indicating potential repair needs.

Section 496
2026 ACE Plan C0080134 Attachment 1 Page 16 of 45 NSPI 16 Tufts Cove Generating station. Unit # 2 Job number 2924 13. Elevation 390’ open pocket along the seam at cold joint, likely from original construc- tion, concrete hammer tests hollo...

AI summary This document is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) and includes details about the Tufts Cove Generating Station, Unit #2. It describes structural issues such as cracks, cold joints, and hollow concrete at various elevations along the station.

Section 497
cracks and hollow concrete either side of large, patched crack 16. Elevation 405’ large crack at cold joint exposed loose aggregate and poor mix and adhesion of original construction. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 239 of 782 REDACTED REDACT...

AI summary The document describes structural issues at the Tufts Cove Generating Station, Unit #2, including large cracks, spalled concrete, exposed reinforcing steel, and poor construction quality at various elevations, as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan.

Section 498
2026 ACE Plan C0080134 Attachment 1 Page 19 of 45 NSPI 19 Tufts Cove Generating station. Unit # 2 Job number 2924 19. Elevation 442’ exposed reinforcing steel spalled concrete 20. Elevation 450’ loose spalled concrete removed as a safety p...

AI summary The text provides technical details from a 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically from Job number 2924 at the Tufts Cove Generating Station, Unit #2. It includes descriptions of structural issues such as exposed reinforcing steel, spalled concrete, and cracks, as well as core samples taken for assessment.

Section 499
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0080134 Attachment 1 Page 21 of 45 NSPI 21 Tufts Cove Generating station. Unit # 2 Job number 2924 23. Elevation 465’ horizontal crack and soft spalled concrete. 24. Elevation 465’...

AI summary The document details structural issues at the Tufts Cove Generating Station Unit #2, including cracks, spalled concrete, exposed reinforcing steel, and poor paint conditions on expansion joints. These findings are part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

Section 500
the concrete column 26. 21’ elevation, underside of breeching duct expansion joint fabric was satisfactory lower paint is very poor. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 244 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan...

AI summary This document provides a detailed description of inspection findings at the Tufts Cove Generating Station, Unit #2, including issues with the breeching duct expansion joint fabric, missing connection hardware, broken backer bars, and water pooling due to cracked sealant.

Section 514
anical Engineer – Tufts Cove and CTs Nova Scotia Power Inc. – Tufts Cove Generating Station 315 Windmill Rd. Dartmouth, Nova Scotia B3A 3C5 CDL Proposal #: 25-6026 Dear Mr. Lebans; Further to your verbal request, dated Apr. 17th 2025, Comm...

AI summary This document is a proposal from Commonwealth Dynamics Limited to Nova Scotia Power Inc. for the removal of existing coatings, repair of concrete deficiencies, and application of epoxy paint on a TUC chimney column at the Tufts Cove Generating Station. The work is intended to prevent moisture infiltration and is expected to take place in Spring and Summer of 2026.

Section 515
NTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0080134 Attachment 2 Page 2 of 4 PROPOSED WORK SCOPE: Crew Mobilization/Demobilization A base crew of employees will be required to mobilize tools and equipment at the Tufts Cove Generatin...

AI summary The proposed work scope for the Tufts Cove Generating Station includes crew mobilization, coating removal using a water blast and capture system, and concrete repairs. The process involves environmental training and systematic removal of coatings to expose bare concrete for assessment.

Section 519
the Intermediate Pressure (IP) turbine (such as rotor, casings, steam path, seals, bearings fasteners) on Tufts Cove Unit 3 to allow for the continued safe and reliable operation of the steam turbine. The Tufts Cove Unit 3 turbine includes...

AI summary This document discusses the need to refurbish or replace the Intermediate Pressure (IP) turbine components on Tufts Cove Unit 3 to ensure continued safe and reliable operation. The IP turbine is subject to degradation from solid particle erosion and creep damage. The project is being filed now to allow for ordering long-lead materials in 2026, with delivery expected in 2027. The asset is categorized under the Steam Production Plant depreciation class with an estimated life of 30 years.

Section 520
etirement and Disposal of Capital Assets • Percentage of Asset Pool: 1.42% JUSTIFICATION: Justification Criteria: Thermal Sub Criteria: Equipment Refurbishment/Replacement Why do this project? The TUC3 steam turbine is forecast to accumula...

AI summary The project involves the refurbishment or replacement of the TUC3 steam turbine due to high operational hours and start/stop cycles, aiming to ensure safe and reliable operation and prevent unplanned outages. The project is being filed now to allow ordering of long-lead materials in 2026 for execution in 2027.

Section 523
Document No: XXX-XX-XXXX-XXXX Columns C through G will auto-populate. Project Cost Estimate Input Checklist and Maturity Matrix Process Industries Required fields: Estimate Classification Project Name: TUC3 IP Turbine Refurbishment Started...

AI summary The document outlines a project cost estimate input checklist and maturity matrix for the TUC3 IP Turbine Refurbishment project by Process Industries. It includes fields for project definition deliverables maturity levels and estimate classifications.

Section 530
ber 12, 2025 Page 276 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Date: December 12, 2025 Page 277 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Date: December 12, 2025 Page 278 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFI...

AI summary This document is a confidential communication from Nova Scotia Power Inc. regarding the 2026 TUC3 IP Major project, referencing a Siemens Energy document with the number SF252356064. It includes an email from Neil Gallant, the Capital Projects Manager at Nova Scotia Power Inc., to an unspecified recipient.

Section 531
ril 3, 2025 Neil Gallant Nova Scotia Power Inc. Capital Projects Manager [email protected] Subject: 2026 TUC3 IP Major Siemens Energy Reference Number SF252356064

AI summary An email from Neil Gallant of Nova Scotia Power Inc. regarding the 2026 TUC3 IP Major project, referencing Siemens Energy with a specific reference number.

Section 537
ON REMOVED) REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0068888 Page 1 of 11 CI Number: C0068888 Title: TUC3 Continuous Ash Hauling System Start Date: 2026/01 In-Service Date: 2026/09 Final Cost Date: 2027/03 Function: Steam Forecast Amount: $1,359,984 DESCRI...

AI summary This document outlines the TUC3 Continuous Ash Hauling System project, which involves installing a drag chain conveyor system on the TUC 3 Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) unit to extract oil fly ash continuously. The current system relies on a vacuum truck for daily ash removal, which is inefficient and poses handling risks. The project is justified under equipment replacement/refurbishment criteria.

Section 538
tirement and Disposal of Capital Assets • Percentage of Asset Pool: 0.19% JUSTIFICATION: Justification Criteria: Thermal Sub Criteria: Equipment Replacement /Refurbishment Why do this project? This project is required as the current method...

AI summary This project aims to replace the current method of handling fly ash with a more reliable and cost-effective solution. The existing process poses risks to the precipitator system and incurs high operational and maintenance costs. The project is needed to reduce reliance on contractor services and ensure efficient ash removal, especially with increased use of heavy fuel oil due to natural gas price volatility.

Section 540
low the facility to more efficiently manage the increased ash output by reducing operating cost and reducing safety risks of operation by minimizing exposure to fly ash. Why do this project this way? The alternatives that NS Power consider...

AI summary NS Power is proposing a mechanical drag chain system to manage increased ash output efficiently, reducing operating costs and safety risks. This choice was advised by industry experts due to the system's suitability for damp ash and its reliability compared to alternatives like pneumatic, screw, or belt conveyors. The project has a 15% contingency based on expert judgment and non-binding guidelines.

Section 551
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0068888 Page 6 of 11 TUC3 Continuous Ash Hauling System Summary of Alternatives Division : Date : 4-Dec-25 Department : CI Number: C0068888 Project No. : After Tax PV of Revenue PV of EVA / Rank (based Alternative W...

AI summary The document evaluates two alternatives for managing ash at TUC3: installing a continuous ash hauling system or doing nothing. The analysis shows that the continuous system has a higher net present value (NPV) and is recommended for installation. The project involves installing a drag chain conveyor system on the TUC3 ESP unit to improve ash collection and transportation.

Section 553
CI Number: C0068888 Project No. : After Tax PV of Revenue PV of EVA / Alternative WACC Requirement NPV Rank IRR Disc Pay A Continuous Ash Hauling System 5.77% 3,245,613 -2,528,869 1 #NUM! 0.0 years B Do Nothing 5.77% 4,435,140 -3,419,061 2...

AI summary The text presents financial analysis of two alternatives: Continuous Ash Hauling System and Do Nothing. It includes metrics such as After Tax WACC, PV of Revenue, PV of EVA/NPV, Rank, IRR, and Disc Pay. There is a 30% variance on capital spend for both alternatives, with corresponding changes in PV of Revenue and PV of EVA/NPV.

Section 557
TUC3 Continuous Ash Hauling System Continuous Ash Hauling System Avoided Applicable Year Total Revenue Operating Costs Expenses Capital CCA UCC CFBT Taxes CFAT PV of CF Discount Factor CNPV 2025 - (227,519.0) - - - - (227,519.0) 65,980.5 (...

AI summary The document presents a financial analysis of the TUC3 Continuous Ash Hauling System from 2025 to 2033, including revenue, operating costs, capital expenditures, and net present value (NPV) calculations over time.

Section 563
TUC3 Continuous Ash Hauling System Do Nothing Avoided Applicable Year Total Revenue Operating Costs Expenses Capital CCA UCC CFBT Taxes CFAT PV of CF Discount Factor CNPV 2025 - (287,795.0) - - - - (287,795.0) 83,460.6 (204,334.5) (204,334...

AI summary The table presents a financial analysis of the TUC3 Continuous Ash Hauling System over the years 2025 to 2033, including operating costs, expenses, capital expenditures, taxes, and net present value (NPV) calculations. The analysis shows increasing costs and negative net present values, indicating potential financial challenges.

Section 569
$0 $0 $0 Total Capital Cost of Alternative $1,359,984 Do Nothing Avoided Replacement Energy Costs Avoided Unplanned Repair Costs Total Annual Avoided Costs Year 2026 2027 2026 2027 2026 2027 Replacement Energy Cost ($/MWh) 0.00 0.00 Repair...

AI summary The text presents financial data related to a 'Do Nothing' scenario, showing zero costs for replacement energy, repair costs, and avoided costs across years 2026 and 2027. It also includes a total capital cost of $1 for an alternative, with all other values being zero or not applicable.

Section 571
0 $0 Total Capital Cost of Alternative $0 0 Avoided Replacement Energy Costs Avoided Unplanned Repair Costs Total Annual Avoided Costs Year 2026 2027 2026 2027 2026 2027 Replacement Energy Cost ($/MWh) 0.00 0.00 Repair Cost ($) 0 0 Events/...

AI summary The document presents a table with zero values for various costs and metrics related to a 2026 ACE Plan, including avoided replacement energy costs, avoided unplanned repair costs, and total annual avoided costs. It also includes a date and page reference, indicating it is part of a larger proceeding document.

Section 576
2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 Year Date: December 12, 2025 Page 305 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0068888 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 11

AI summary The text represents a redacted page from a 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submission, likely containing confidential information related to Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSPI) capital spending proposals.

Section 581
25/2025 CQT02974-0005 GAVIN MCINNIS NOVA SCOTIA POWER - TUFT'S COVE Page 2 of 11 For specific questions about line items, please contact the Product Estimator listed on the line. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 307 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (C...

AI summary The document includes a quotation for a Fly Ash Handling System, with personnel details and contact information for a product estimator. It is part of a 2026 ACE Plan and is associated with Nova Scotia Power's Tuft's Cove project.

Section 585
of items quoted herein is excluded from the pricing offered. Equipment will be designed and fabricated in a manner to allow for the most economic shipping method and efficient assembly of equipment. Pricing does NOT include: • Civil Engine...

AI summary The document outlines the pricing exclusions for equipment, specifying that civil engineering, electrical components, installation, and other related costs are not included. It also provides a preliminary delivery schedule, including timelines for approval drawings and equipment readiness.

Section 607
or expiration of this Agreement including, but not limited to, the following provisions: Section 9 (Insurance), Section 20 (Limitation of Liability), Section 23 (Governing Law), Section 28 (Confidential Information) and this Section 31 (Su...

AI summary This document is a budgetary proposal from ProcessBarron – Southern Field Canada Inc. to Nova Scotia Power for the mechanical installation of ash handling equipment at the Tufts Cove Generating Station. The proposal references a specific project and includes details about the scope of work.

Section 608
e installation of ash handling equipment as described in ProcessBarron proposal CQT02974. The scope of work included in our budgetary estimate consists of mechanical installation of the following: The scope of work associated with this pro...

AI summary The document outlines the scope of work for the installation of ash handling equipment as proposed by ProcessBarron in CQT02974. It includes mechanical installation, planning, procurement, and mobilization, but excludes several other services and responsibilities.

Section 641
owned engine. A new engine would be a magnitude of cost higher when compared to this engine refurbishment and still would require the same inspection and maintenance cost going forward. Contingency: Contingency for this project has been de...

AI summary The text discusses the cost implications of refurbishing an engine versus replacing it with a new one, noting that refurbishment is significantly cheaper. It also outlines the contingency plan, which is based on expert judgment, similar projects, and guidelines, with a 15% contingency allocated for risks related to unforeseen costs during disassembly and inspection.

Section 648
Not Applicable (NA) NR NR Instrumentation/Control System Discipline Drawings Not Applicable (NA) NR NR Mechanical Discipline Drawings Not Applicable (NA) NR NR Total # Deliverables for 3 14 15 15 15 this Project % Defined/Complete 100% 100...

AI summary This project is being filed as a Class 3 estimate with a 15% contingency, based on similar past projects. The contingency accounts for risks such as increased fallout and additional costs from disassembly and inspection.

Section 649
inspections. The contingency will also cover costs related to the scope of the refurbishment, which cannot be fully defined and costed until the depot level disassembly and inspection is completed. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 330 of 782 R...

AI summary The text discusses inspection findings and refurbishment contingency costs for a turbine, highlighting issues such as blade looseness, bearing oil leakage, and component wear, which require further disassembly and inspection to fully define and cost.

Section 653
782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0080135 Attachment 1 Page 19 of 21 BGT2 BSI March 25, 2025 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 350 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C...

AI summary This document outlines a transmission line replacement project for L-7012, a 230 kV line built in 1982, requiring upgrades due to deteriorated assets identified through NS Power’s inspection program. The project involves replacing assets on 72 structures and is part of the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 655
ansmission line inspection program results, as well as the criticality of the line to the overall system operation. This project is required to support the reliable operation of the transmission line. This project is deemed in-service when...

AI summary The document discusses a transmission line replacement and upgrade project, emphasizing the need to replace deteriorated assets for reliable system operation. The project is classified as Class 3 with a 15% contingency due to risks such as overtime work, material cost increases, and remote access challenges. The project is expected to be in-service by January 2026, with the final cost date set for January 2028.

Section 656
the NSEB approved project budget which generally used a 10 percent contingency amount. Based on these past similar projects an increased contingency of 15 percent is being applied to this project. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 359 of 782 RE...

AI summary The document discusses the capital project detailed estimate for the L7012 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1, with a 15 percent contingency applied due to increased risk compared to past projects that used a 10 percent contingency.

Section 657
enance PD 34 $ 444 $ 15,000 Sub-Total $ 208,688 Overtime Labour T&D Labour - Site Supervision PD 5 $ 922 $ 4,303 T&D Labour - System Maintenance PD 2 $ 889 $ 2,151 Sub-Total $ 6,454 Materials Wood Poles Lot 1 $ 1,319,018 $ 1,319,018 O/H Co...

AI summary The text presents a detailed breakdown of costs associated with various categories such as labour, materials, contracts, and other goods and services. It includes line items for overtime labour, materials like wood poles and overhead conductor, contracts for wood poles and surveying, and a contingency percentage applied to total costs.

Section 658
% 15% $ 4,265,565 $ 639,835 Sub-Total $ 639,835 Vehicle Overhead Vehicle Labour AO $ 68,190 Sub-Total $ 68,190 Administrative Overhead Labour AO $ 114,396 Contractor AO $ 282,331 Sub-Total $ 396,728 SUB-TOTAL (no AO, AFUDC) $ 4,905,400 TOT...

AI summary The document contains a budget breakdown with various overhead costs and a total cost including AO and AFUDC. It also mentions the 2026 ACE Plan and includes a note about labour figures being used for budgeting purposes.

Section 659
VED) 2026 ACE Plan C0080110 Page 4 of 5 Instructions: Select option in Column B. Document No: XXX-XX-XXXX-XXXX Columns C through G will auto-populate. Project Cost Estimate Input Checklist and Maturity Matrix Transmission Line Infrastructu...

AI summary The document outlines a project cost estimate input checklist and maturity matrix for the L7012 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 transmission line infrastructure project. It includes fields for project maturity levels and estimate classifications.

Section 669
contingency of 15 percent. Risks intended to be covered by this contingency include unforeseen material and contract cost increases, schedule setbacks, and possible complications during execution. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 364 of 782 RE...

AI summary The text discusses a contingency plan with a 15% buffer to address potential risks such as material and contract cost increases, schedule delays, and complications during execution. It also includes a project cost estimate input checklist and maturity matrix for a transformer addition project.

Section 677
pleted. A contingency value of 15% was selected to account for specific risks associated with unforeseen material and contract cost increases, schedule setbacks, and complications during execution. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 366 of 782 R...

AI summary The text discusses a contingency value of 15% selected to address risks related to unforeseen material and contract cost increases, schedule setbacks, and complications during execution. It also references a distribution study addendum for the Bridgewater area, dated November 10, 2025, and part of the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 680
EDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0070909 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 16 Bridgewater Area Planning Study Addendum

AI summary The text references an addendum to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically the Bridgewater Area Planning Study Addendum, attached to document C0070909.

Section 689
ely recommended proceeding with Alternative B-2, establishing a long-term plan for 70W-High Street Substation to transition entirely to 12 kV operation once all remaining 4 kV loads were converted. W-AREA-2025-017 Nov 10, 2025 4 Date: Dece...

AI summary The document discusses the deferred conversion of the 70W-High Street Substation from 4 kV to 12 kV operation, highlighting the need for a long-term plan to complete the transition initiated in the 2006 Bridgewater Area Study. System upgrades since 2006 have not fully resolved the need for additional 12 kV capacity.

Section 692
lternative resolves the immediate Deteriorated Plant Criteria Violation associated with the existing transformer, it retains the 4 kV system in service, requiring ongoing maintenance of aging assets. 5.2 Alternative B – Add T52 (69-12 kV,...

AI summary Alternative B proposes installing a new transformer and converting remaining 4 kV feeders to 12 kV, retiring an aging transformer and eliminating the need for ongoing investment in the 4 kV system. This option aligns with Nova Scotia Power’s voltage standardization strategy and offers long-term operational benefits.

Section 693
removes the need for ongoing investment in the 4 kV system. Alternative B is therefore the recommended solution, offering the lowest cost with significantly higher system and operational benefits. W-AREA-2025-017 Nov 10, 2025 9 Date: Decem...

AI summary The Bridgewater Area Planning Study Addendum concludes that Alternative B is the recommended solution for replacing transformer 70W-T51 and completing voltage conversions at 70W-High Street Substation. The project will retire 4 kV assets, upgrade to 12 kV transformation, and align with Nova Scotia Power’s long-term distribution strategy. The estimated investment is $4.3 million, with completion planned for January 2029.

Section 694
condition and system performance needs while aligning with the company’s long-term distribution strategy. The estimated investment is 4.3 million dollars, with completion planned for January 2029. W-AREA-2025-017 Nov 10, 2025 10 Date: Dece...

AI summary The document discusses a planned investment of 4.3 million dollars for a project aimed at meeting condition and system performance needs, aligning with the company's long-term distribution strategy, with completion planned for January 2029. The text includes a planning study addendum related to the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 695
D) REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0070909 Attachment 1 Page 15 of 16 Bridgewater Area Planning Study Addendum Appendix B Economic Analysis Data W-AREA-2025-017 Nov 10, 2025 14 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 382 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIA...

AI summary This document outlines the L7001 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 project, which involves replacing deteriorated transmission assets on 59 structures of a 230 kV transmission line built in 1979. The project is part of NS Power’s transmission line inspection program and is forecasted to cost $3,063,280.

Section 697
ansmission line inspection program results, as well as the criticality of the line to the overall system operation. This project is required to support the reliable operation of the transmission line. This project is deemed in-service when...

AI summary This document discusses a transmission line replacement and upgrade project, emphasizing the need to replace deteriorated assets as the only technically feasible option. It outlines the project timeline, with the first portion expected to be completed in January 2026 and the final cost date set for January 2028. A contingency of 15% is applied based on past project experiences and risk factors.

Section 698
the NSEB approved project budget which generally used a 10 percent contingency amount. Based on these past similar projects an increased contingency of 15 percent is being applied to this project. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 385 of 782 RE...

AI summary The document discusses the approval of a project budget with a 10 percent contingency, but an increased contingency of 15 percent is being applied due to past similar projects. The text also provides a detailed estimate for the L-7001 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 project, including labor costs and quantities.

Section 700
% 15% $ 2,394,816 $ 359,222 Sub-Total $ 359,222 Vehicle Overhead Vehicle Labour AO $ 44,214 Sub-Total $ 44,214 Administrative Overhead Labour AO $ 74,174 Contractor AO $ 190,854 Sub-Total $ 265,028 SUB-TOTAL (no AO, AFUDC) $ 2,754,038 TOTA...

AI summary The document presents a detailed financial breakdown of costs associated with vehicle and administrative overheads, including labour and contractor expenses, and provides a total cost figure including AO and AFUDC. Notes explain the methodology used for calculating labour figures and note small discrepancies due to rounding.

Section 701
) 2026 ACE Plan C0080109 Page 4 of 5 Instructions: Select option in Column B. Document No: XXX-XX-XXXX-XXXX Columns C through G will auto-populate. Project Cost Estimate Input Checklist and Maturity Matrix Transmission Line Infrastructure...

AI summary The document presents a project cost estimate input checklist and maturity matrix for the L-7001 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 transmission line infrastructure project. It outlines the required fields and estimate classification based on the maturity level of project definition deliverables.

Section 708
required to complete the project within the available outage window, unforeseen material or contract cost increases, or unforeseen costs related to accessing structures in wet or remote locations. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 387 of 782 RE...

AI summary This document outlines the 76W-T1 Transformer Replacement project at Mahone Bay Substation, which involves replacing an aging transformer with a higher capacity unit, upgrading infrastructure, and improving safety standards. The project is part of the 2026 ACE Plan and has a forecasted cost of $2,818,855.

Section 709
The project also includes redesigning and installing new transformer foundation, adding a new transmission structure, improving oil containment, and updating the ground grid to meet modern standards. Summary of Related CIs +/- 2 years: Pur...

AI summary The project involves replacing the 76W-T1 transformer in Mahone Bay due to its end-of-life status, internal overheating signs, and anticipated load growth. The transformer is the sole supply to the town, and replacement is necessary for reliable and safe power delivery.

Section 710
icates that replacing the unit with a new, higher-capacity transformer is the best approach. Overall, this project is crucial to maintain reliable, safe, and efficient power delivery to Mahone Bay. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 389 of 782 R...

AI summary This project involves replacing a transformer (76W-T1) to prevent unplanned failure and ensure reliable power delivery to Mahone Bay. The presence of ethylene in the main tank indicates internal degradation, and delaying replacement increases the risk of sudden failure. The project also aligns with the Town of Mahone Bay’s planned low-voltage infrastructure upgrades and NS Power’s asset management strategy.

Section 711
work within the current capital planning cycle ensures alignment with NS Power’s asset management strategy improving the asset condition rating and overall risk profile. Why do this project this way? This project is designed to deliver a c...

AI summary The project aims to upgrade the 76W – Mahone Bay substation by replacing its transformer to align with NS Power’s asset management strategy. This approach is deemed the most viable and cost-effective solution, ensuring future capacity and reliability improvements while collaborating with the Town of Mahone Bay.

Section 712
uire similar upgrades to another transformer elsewhere on the system to handle the increased load. Therefore, replacing the existing transformer at 76W is the most practical and cost-effective choice. Upgrading the high voltage substation...

AI summary The document discusses the replacement of a transformer at 76W and upgrades to a high voltage substation structure to ensure reliability and alignment with modern design standards. A 15% contingency is applied to project costs, excluding the transformer, to account for potential risks such as overtime work and unexpected service wire deterioration.

Section 713
e: December 12, 2025 Page 390 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0053214 Page 3 of 5 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 391 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) REDACTED 202...

AI summary This document outlines a project cost estimate input checklist and maturity matrix for the 76W-T1 Transformer Replacement project under the 2026 ACE Plan. It includes fields for project maturity levels and estimate classifications.

Section 721
100% 100% 89% 74% 69% towards Class Estimate Comments: The estimate for this project is classified as a Class 3 estimate. A 15% contingency has been used for the estimate for this project. This aligns with AACE recommendations for this lev...

AI summary This document provides an estimate for the replacement of two 138kV in-line transmission switches on the L-6536 transmission line in Amherst, Nova Scotia. The project is classified as a Class 3 estimate with a 15% contingency, and the forecast amount is $2,074,494.

Section 724
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0070586 Page 2 of 5 Why do this project this way? The only method to make switches 22N-603 and 22N-604 live-line operable is to design a new ground grid and install new li...

AI summary The project involves designing a new ground grid and installing live-line operable switches to make switches 22N-603 and 22N-604 safe for operation. The contingency for the project is 20 percent, covering risks such as contractor availability, delays in material delivery, and cost increases due to tariff impacts.

Section 725
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0070586 Page 3 of 5 Capital Project Detailed Estimate Location: Transmission CI#: C0070586 Title: L6536 Switch Replacement Execution Year: 2026 Completed Similar Description Unit Quantity Unit Estimate Total Estimat...

AI summary The document outlines a capital project detailed estimate for the L6536 Switch Replacement under the 2026 ACE Plan. It provides a breakdown of labor costs for various tasks involved in the project, including engineering, project management, design, and site supervision, with a total estimated cost of $118,277.

Section 726
15 $ 444 $ 6,750 Sub-Total $ 118,277 Materials Transmission structure replacement material Lot 1 $ 121,918 $ 121,918 Substation material Lot 1 $ 98,827 $ 98,827 Standard Quick break Whip Assembly Lot 1 Attachment 1, Item 2 Inline 138kV Dis...

AI summary The text presents financial data related to materials and equipment for transmission and substation projects, including costs for replacement materials, switches, and conversion rates. Totals are provided for each category and overall sub-total.

Section 728
Contracts Transmission structure replacement Lot 1 $ 299,304 $ 299,304 Substation Construction Lot 1 $ 457,204 $ 457,204 Vegetation Clearing Lot 1 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Road Access Upgrade Lot 1 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Surveying/AsBuilts of Comissio...

AI summary The text presents a list of contracts and associated costs for various infrastructure projects, including transmission structure replacement, substation construction, vegetation clearing, and others, with a total cost of $977,226.

Section 731
e of salaries across a variety of jobs within similar classifications including fringe, and are used solely for budgeting purposes. Note 2: Small differences in totals are attributable to rounding. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 396 of 782 R...

AI summary The text provides a project cost estimate input checklist and maturity matrix for the L6536 Switch Replacements transmission line infrastructure project, including classification levels and required fields for project definition deliverables.

Section 739
100% 100% 59% 44% 44% towards Class Estimate Comments: This project is being filed as a Class 3 estimate. The defined deliverables for this project indicate that 59% of Class 3 deliverables are completed. A contingency value of 20% was sel...

AI summary The document discusses the filing of a Class 3 estimate for a project, with 59% of deliverables completed. A 20% contingency was included to manage risks such as contractor availability, delays in long-lead material delivery, and material cost increases due to tariff threats.

Section 741
Commercial Notes Delivery is dependent on factory capacity at time of order placement. Delivery is Dependent on Factory Capacity at Time of Order Placement. All Pricing is in US Dollars (USD). Cleaveland/Price Inc. warrants that the produc...

AI summary This document outlines the replacement of a 96H-T1 transformer, including its start date, in-service date, final cost date, function, and forecast amount. It also contains commercial notes regarding delivery, warranty, pricing, and other terms.

Section 742
art Date: 2024/09 In-Service Date: 2026/10 Final Cost Date: 2027/04 Function: Transmission Forecast Amount: $2,056,752 DESCRIPTION: This project is for the replacement of the 96H-T1 transformer, a 7.5/10/12.5 MVA, 6.9–69 kV step-up transfo...

AI summary The project involves replacing a 7.5/10/12.5 MVA, 6.9–69 kV step-up transformer at the Ruth Falls Hydro Generating Station due to significant corrosion and oil leaks. The transformer is critical for stepping up energy to 69kV for local distribution and transmission. The existing transformer requires replacement to reduce maintenance and environmental risks.

Section 743
f Retirement: Accounting Policy 6420 - Retirement and Disposal of Capital Assets • Percentage of Asset Pool: 0.11% JUSTIFICATION: Justification Criteria: Transmission Plant Why do this project? Utilizing NS Power’s Transformer Risk Assessm...

AI summary The 96H-T1 transformer has reached the end of its service life and is experiencing recurring oil leaks due to severe corrosion. Replacement is necessary to avoid operational, financial, and environmental risks, as the transformer is critical for connecting the Ruth Falls Hydro Generating Station to the transmission grid.

Section 745
support is limited as vendor is no longer in business. Replacement is the most reliable and cost-effective solution to ensure long-term performance and environmental protection. Contingency Statement Contingency for this project has been d...

AI summary The document discusses the replacement of a transformer due to the vendor no longer being in business, emphasizing that replacement is the most reliable and cost-effective solution for long-term performance and environmental protection. A contingency of 15 percent has been applied to the project based on internal expert judgment and previous experience.

Section 746
Instructions: Select option in Column B. Columns C through G will auto-populate. Project Cost Estimate Input Checklist and Maturity Matrix Transmission Line Infrastructure Required fields: Estimate Classification Project Name: 96H-T1 Trans...

AI summary This document presents a project cost estimate input checklist and maturity matrix for the 96H-T1 Transformer Replacement project, outlining the required fields and estimate classification based on the maturity level of project definition deliverables.

Section 754
for specific risks associated with additional overtime work that may be required to complete the project within the available outage window, and any unforeseen material or contract cost increases. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 406 of 782 RE...

AI summary This document discusses the replacement of four Pennsylvania circuit breakers on NS Power’s system, including the risks associated with additional overtime work and unforeseen cost increases. The project involves replacing one 69 kV and three 138 kV circuit breakers, which are considered high risk due to reliability concerns.

Section 756
s limited ability to maintain and repair these breakers, combined with their poor operation history, results in an unacceptably high risk associated with continued operation. Why do this project now? These circuit breakers are required to...

AI summary The project aims to replace aging circuit breakers to reduce the risk of failure and ensure reliable transmission system operation. It is part of a multi-year initiative, with the first replacement expected in August 2026 and the final cost date set for June 2029.

Section 757
timated August 2026); therefore, the Final Cost Date (June 2029) is six months after the last circuit breaker is expected to be replaced on this project (December 2028). Why do this project this way? Proactively replacing Pennsylvania circ...

AI summary NS Power is proactively replacing Pennsylvania circuit breakers on the transmission system due to the unavailability of replacement parts and manufacturer support. The project is being staged to reduce risk and ensure achievable annual scopes without excessive outages. A 10% contingency has been allocated for potential overtime and cost increases.

Section 769
82 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0080266 Page 2 of 6 Feeder Geographic Location Kilometers 4N-313 Tatamagouche 15 57C-417 Ogden 2 57C-426 Jordanville 17 62N-413 Thorburn 18 74N-412 Millevale 9 102W-311...

AI summary The document lists distribution feeder projects with their geographic locations and lengths, along with related capital expenditures for new distribution rights-of-way phases from 2024 to 2028, as required under Section 11.2 of the CEJC.

Section 774
ave previously existed. The new rights-of-way will primarily be established adjacent to the road right-of-way edge, where most distribution feeders are currently located and bordered by vegetation. 1 Review of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s (NSP...

AI summary The document discusses the establishment of new distribution rights-of-way adjacent to existing road right-of-way edges, with a focus on the Provincial Distribution System and the 2026 ACE Plan. It includes details on labor costs for a Forestry Coordinator and the overall cost estimate for the project.

Section 777
$216,000 4N-313 Km 15 $43,200 $648,000 57C-417 Km 2 $43,200 $86,400 57C-426 Km 17 $43,200 $734,400 62N-413 Km 18 $43,200 $777,600 74N-412 Km 9 $43,200 $388,800 102W-311 Km 10 $43,200 $432,000 23W-301 Km 5 $43,200 $216,000 25W-302 Km 16 $43...

AI summary The text presents a list of line items with distances, costs per kilometer, and total costs. These entries appear to be related to capital expenditures or infrastructure projects, likely involving transportation or utility services.

Section 779
e of salaries across a variety of jobs within similar classifications including fringe, and are used solely for budgeting purposes. Note 2: Small differences in totals are attributable to rounding. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 416 of 782 R...

AI summary The text includes a checklist and maturity matrix for estimating project costs related to a new distribution right of way infrastructure project, with classifications based on the maturity level of project definition deliverables.

Section 787
Page 418 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0080266 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 2

AI summary The document is a redacted page from a regulatory proceeding, specifically an attachment to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It is part of a larger submission (C0080266) and contains confidential information that has been removed.

Section 792
8 5 3 2 73W-411GB 7 5 3 2 73W-411GCA 8 4 3 1 74N-412 16 3 2 1 74N-412G 18 5 1 4 88H-402G 9 3 2 1 91W-411 9 3 2 1 In some cases, the overall condition average condition (combined vegetation assessment and reliability indicators) for the of...

AI summary This document outlines a capital project to replace deteriorated power lines and infrastructure along 36V-303 in Baxter’s Harbour, Kings County. The project involves replacing 5.28 km of single-phase conductors, 5 transformers, and 9 poles with upgraded materials and additional poles, with a forecasted cost of $1,062,416.

Section 793
n transformers, and 9 poles with 5,280 meters of single-phase 2/0 AASC primary and neutral conductors, 5 distribution transformers, and 11 poles. Associated hardware and framing will also be replaced. Summary of Related CIs +/- 2 years: Pu...

AI summary The document outlines a reconductor project involving transformers, poles, and conductors, with associated costs and depreciation details. It includes related capital items from previous years and discusses the justification for the project based on deteriorated conductor conditions.

Section 794
Retirement and Disposal of Capital Assets • Percentage of Asset Pool: 0.01% JUSTIFICATION: Justification Criteria: Distribution System Sub Criteria: Deteriorated Conductor Why do this project? This project is designed to mitigate the circu...

AI summary This project aims to replace a severely deteriorated conductor and associated overhead components on a distribution line to mitigate circuit risk, improve reliability, and prevent unplanned outages. The conductor has reached the end of its service life and poses increased operational risks.

Section 795
d past outage performance has confirmed that conductor replacement is necessary. Delaying this project increases the likelihood of additional unplanned interruptions for customers served by this line. This project is deemed in service when...

AI summary The document discusses a conductor replacement project necessary to prevent additional unplanned outages. The project is phased, with the first distribution transformer replacement expected in August 2026 and the final cost date set for July 2027. The approach focuses on replacing the most deteriorated sections of the line. A 10% contingency has been applied to cover potential risks such as additional equipment replacement and tree trimming.

Section 796
2026 ACE Plan C0080104 Page 3 of 5 Capital Project Detailed Estimate Location: Distribution CI# : C0080104 Title: 36V-303 Baxter's Harbour Rd Reconductor Phase 1 Execution Year: 2026 Cost Support Completed Similar Description Unit Quantity...

AI summary The document provides a detailed estimate for the 36V-303 Baxter's Harbour Rd Reconductor Phase 1 project under the 2026 ACE Plan. It outlines labor and travel expenses, including costs for project management, scoping, and engineering, along with a total estimate of $93,131.

Section 799
Lot 1 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 Sub-Total $ 1,500 Other Goods & Services Contingency % 10% $ 825,851 $ 82,585 Sub-Total $ 82,585 Vehicle Overhead Vehicle Labour AO $ 27,216 Sub-Total $ 27,216 Interest Capitalized AFUDC $ 11,017 Sub-Total $ 11,017 Ad...

AI summary The text presents a detailed breakdown of costs associated with various categories such as contingency, vehicle overhead, interest capitalized, and administrative overhead. These costs are itemized with specific amounts, and a total is provided including all overhead and capitalized interest.

Section 800
SUB-TOTAL (no AO, AFUDC) $ 908,436 TOTAL (AO, AFUDC included) 1,062,416 Original Cost $ 111,854 Note 1: The labour figures noted above are an average of salaries across a variety of jobs within similar classifications including fringe, and...

AI summary The document includes financial figures such as sub-total and total costs, with notes on labor figures used for budgeting. It also references the 2026 ACE Plan and contains redacted information.

Section 808
ent. The contingency will also provide coverage for further project requirements including the balancing of load for transformers, and any additional tree trimming required along the service lines. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 424 of 782 R...

AI summary The text discusses a contingency plan for a project, including load balancing for transformers and additional tree trimming along service lines. It also includes a description of a capital item related to a reconductor and line extension project with specific dates and a forecasted cost.

Section 809
tart Date: 2025/11 In-Service Date: 2027/06 Final Cost Date: 2028/05 Function: Distribution Forecast Amount: $1,288,474 DESCRIPTION: This project is for the extension of approximately 3.0 kilometers of a 3-phase distribution line along Mel...

AI summary This project involves extending and upgrading a distribution line in Guysborough County to improve reliability. It includes replacing deteriorated conductors with new 336 ACSR primary and 4/0 AASC neutral conductors, installing 73 new poles, and adhering to current standards. Related capital items include past and future projects on the same feeder.

Section 811
782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan C0080612 Page 2 of 5 distribution assets on this feeder section in this manner is imperative, as delaying further upgrades or continuing to operate overhead equipment i...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines a project to reconfigure and upgrade the 57C-426H feeder section between Country Harbour and Indian Harbour Lake, which serves nearly 1,000 customers. The project involves constructing new 3-phase distribution lines and reconductoring existing 1-phase lines. The project is classified as a Class 3 estimate with a 10% contingency to cover risks like equipment replacement and tree trimming.

Section 812
mate with a contingency of 10 percent. Risks intended to be covered by the contingency include the replacement of any additional equipment, rock breaking, and any additional tree trimming required. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 427 of 782 R...

AI summary This document provides a detailed estimate for a capital project related to the reconductoring and line extension phase 1 at location 57C-426H Melrose. It includes labor costs for various roles such as on-site supervisors, engineering designers, and project managers, with a total estimate of $163,724.

Section 814
Lot 1 $ 11,200 $ 11,200 Sub-Total $ 11,200 Meals & Entertainment Meals Lot 1 $ 1,600 $ 1,600 Sub-Total $ 1,600 Other Goods & Services Contingency % 10% $ 953,227 $ 95,323 Sub-Total $ 95,323 Vehicle Overhead Vehicle Labour AO $ 52,787 Sub-T...

AI summary The document outlines various financial line items including meals and entertainment, contingency expenses, vehicle overhead, and interest capitalized. These items are listed with their respective costs and sub-totals.

Section 815
$ - Sub-Total $ 32,456 Administrative Overhead Labour AO $ 88,397 Contractor AO $ 66,284 Sub-Total $ 154,681 SUB-TOTAL (no AO, AFUDC) $ 1,048,550 TOTAL (AO, AFUDC included) $ 1,288,474 Original Cost $ 227,486 Note 1: The labour figures not...

AI summary The document provides a summary of administrative overhead costs, including labour and contractor expenses, and includes a total budget with and without administrative and construction allowances. The original cost and notes on salary averaging and rounding differences are also included.

Section 816
2026 ACE Plan C0080612 Page 4 of 5 Instructions: Select option in Column B. Document No: XXX-XX-XXXX-XXXX Columns C through G will auto-populate. Project Cost Estimate Input Checklist and Maturity Matrix Transmission Line Infrastructure Re...

AI summary The document presents a project cost estimate input checklist and maturity matrix for the 57C-426H Melrose Reconductoring and Line Extension Phase 1 transmission line infrastructure project. It outlines the required fields and estimate classification based on project maturity.

Section 823
NR Instrument Datasheets Not Applicable (NA) NR NR/S Electrical Discipline Drawings Not Applicable (NA) NR NR Instrumentation/Control System Discipline Drawings Not Applicable (NA) NR NR Total # Deliverables for this Project 5 22 20 20 20...

AI summary The document outlines a Class 3 project estimate with 87% of deliverables completed. A 10% contingency was selected to cover risks such as equipment replacement, rock breaking, and additional tree trimming.

Section 827
tomers. This project is an opportunity allowing NS Power to improve situational awareness and ultimately expedite critical operating functionalities during severe weather events and other emergencies. This project is deemed in-service when...

AI summary This project involves installing RTUs at substations to improve situational awareness and operational efficiency during emergencies. The project is classified as a Class 3 Estimate with a 10% contingency for risks like overtime, currency exchange fluctuations, and material costs. The final cost date is set for June 2030.

Section 828
2026 ACE Plan C0080111 Page 3 of 5 Capital Project Detailed Estimate Location: General Plant CI# : C0080111 Title: 2026 RTU Deployment Execution Year: 2026-2029 Completed Similar Projects Description Unit Quantity Unit Estimate Total Estim...

AI summary This document outlines a capital project detailed estimate for the 2026 RTU Deployment under the 2026 ACE Plan, with a focus on the General Plant location and execution years 2026-2029.

Section 833
1 $ 27,600 $ 27,600 Sub-Total $ 27,600 Training & Development Training & Development Lot 1 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 Sub-Total $ 9,000 Other Goods and Services Contingency % 10% $ 6,085,751 $ 608,575 Sub-Total $ 608,575 Vehicle Overhead Vehicle AO %...

AI summary The text presents a summary of expenses categorized into different headings, including Training & Development, Other Goods and Services, Vehicle Overhead, and Interest Capitalized. Each category lists the percentage or amount allocated, with sub-totals provided for each section.

Section 834
$ 121,513 Sub-Total $ 121,513 Administrative Overhead Labour AO % 910,133 Contractor AO % $ 142,245 Sub-Total $ 1,052,378 SUB-TOTAL (no AO, AFUDC) $ 6,694,326 TOTAL (AO, AFUDC included) $ 8,322,655 Original Cost N/A Note 1: The labour figu...

AI summary This document provides a summary of administrative overhead costs, including labour and contractor expenses, as part of the 2026 ACE Plan. It includes a total of $8,322,655 when administrative overhead and AFUDC are included, with notes on salary averages and rounding differences.

Section 837
Project Cost Estimate Input Checklist and Maturity Matrix Equipment Replacement Required fields: Estimate Classification Project Name: 2026 RTU Deployment Started or Preliminary Class 5 Class 4 Class 3 Class 2 Class 1 Maturity Level of Pro...

AI summary This document outlines a project cost estimate input checklist and maturity matrix for the 2026 RTU Deployment project. It includes sections on project scope, capacity, location, requirements, technology selection, strategy, and planning, with defined and preliminary status indicators.

Section 840
re foreign currency fluctuations, additional tariffs or duties due to ongoing uncertainties in international supply chains, resource rate increases and potential overtime work that may be required. Date: December 12, 2025 Page 434 of 782 R...

AI summary The text discusses potential cost factors such as foreign currency fluctuations, additional tariffs, resource rate increases, and potential overtime work. It also references the 2026 ACE Plan and includes a checklist for IT/OT projects developed by NSPI.

Section 841
Date: September 23, 2025 P: 913.451.1880; www.NovaTechAutomation.com Page: 4 of 5 Commercial Unit Price Extended Qty Product & Description Lead Time (USD) (USD) 1 Outdoor Enclosure, Style A3B as described above 14-16 Weeks ARO 59,865.00 59...

AI summary This document outlines a project titled 'Intelligent Asset Data Capture & Integration Platform' for NS Power, aimed at enhancing asset intelligence using AI to improve prioritization of work streams in Energy Delivery. The project is part of the 2026 ACE Plan with a forecast amount of $267,941.

Section 843
vailable to be utilized to enhance a wide variety of current business tasks that may otherwise have required mobilization of different team resources to the field to plan customer or maintenance work. To fully populate and establish this p...

AI summary The document outlines a project to enhance operational efficiency by utilizing AI and machine learning through data collection and integration into NS Power's GIS system, funded by Natural Resources Canada. It also discusses the depreciation class and estimated life of an asset related to the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 844
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0080252 Page 2 of 5 JUSTIFICATION: Justification Criteria: Distribution System Why do this project? This project advances NS Power’s overall asset intelligence in a way that is sustainable through the use of the enh...

AI summary This project aims to enhance NS Power’s asset intelligence by integrating advanced technology into their field resources and GIS system, enabling continuous data updates and streamlining customer request processing. The project is being executed now due to the limited timeframe for federal funding, which covers most costs except administrative overheads and contingency.

Section 845
the work is completed (January 2026); therefore, the Final Cost Date (June 2027) is listed as six months after the last portion of the work is forecast to be completed). Why do this project this way? This project establishes an effective w...

AI summary The project aims to improve data intelligence on distribution assets using technology and machine learning automation, replacing manual and outdated methods. It is fully funded by the federal government except for administrative overheads and is classified as a Class 1 estimate with a 2% contingency applied for unforeseen issues.

Section 846
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan C0080252 Page 3 of 5 Capital Project Detailed Estimate Location: General Plant CI# : C0080252 Title: Intelligent Asset Data Capture & Integration Platform Execution Year: 2025-2026 Cost Support Completed Similar Desc...

AI summary This document outlines a capital project titled 'Intelligent Asset Data Capture & Integration Platform' under the 2026 ACE Plan, with detailed estimates for labor costs across various roles, including GIS Technologists, IT Integration Specialists, and Program Managers, totaling $115,885.

Section 847
PD 153 $ 452 $ 69,010 Sub-Total $ 115,885 Software Data Capture Platform Lot 1 USD to CAD Lot 40% Sub-Total Consulting GIS Consultant Programmer Lot 1 $ 85,470 $ 85,470 Interim Project Manager Lot 1 $ 30,240 $ 30,240 GIS Technical Resource...

AI summary The text provides a summary of costs related to software, consulting, other goods and services, interest capitalized, and administrative overhead, including amounts in USD and CAD, and percentages applied to certain costs.

Section 848
178 Administrative Overhead Labour AO $ 63,306 Sub-Total $ 63,306 SUB-TOTAL (no AO, AFUDC) $ 10,363,978 Federal Funding Offset $ (10,159,521) TOTAL (AO, AFUDC included) $ 267,941 Original Cost N/A Note 1: The labour figures noted above are...

AI summary This document presents an administrative overhead breakdown, including labour costs and federal funding offsets, as part of a 2026 ACE Plan. It outlines budget figures and notes that the data is for budgeting purposes only.

Section 853
100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Class Estimate Comments: This project is being filed as a Class 1 estimate. The defined deliverables for this project indicate that 100% of Class 1 requirements have been met. As procurement is fully complete, this...

AI summary This document provides a Class 1 cost estimate for an Energy Control Centre project, indicating that 100% of Class 1 requirements have been met. A 2% contingency is applied for unforeseen issues during final execution. The project is part of the 2026 ACE Plan and includes a checklist for estimating costs following AACE guidelines.

Section 854
2026 ACE Plan Appendix A Page 1 of 2 CONFIDENTIALITY MATRIX LEGEND Confidential in Entirety (shaded) TS = Technical Support Partially Confidential (Italicized) CS = Cost Support (1) = Commercial/Cost Information (2) = Third Party Proprieta...

AI summary The document presents a confidentiality matrix for the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Appendix A, outlining different levels of confidentiality for information, including technical support, cost support, and system security classifications.

Section 855
prietary Information Includes Description, PowerPlant (PP), Detailed Cost Estimate (DCE), and Economic Analysis Model (EAM) (or Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for IT projects). (3) = System Security

AI summary The text references proprietary information related to power plant details, cost estimates, and economic analysis models. It also mentions system security as a key consideration.

Section 856
Function/Tab Capital Work Order Work Order Attachment 1 Attachment 2 Attachment 3 Main Body Generation Steam Projects Boiler G01 C0080206 - POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 G02 C0080205 - POA Boiler Refractory Refurbishments 2026 Steam Turbin...

AI summary The document outlines capital work orders for various steam generation projects, including boiler and turbine refurbishments, with details on attachments such as detailed cost estimates, condition assessments, and vendor quotes.

Section 857
m DCE (1) Vendor Quote (1,2) Vendor Quote (1,2) Vendor Quote (1,2) Gas Turbine Projects G08 C0080135 - CT-BGT2 Engine Refurbishment DCE (1) Inspection Report Vendor Quote (1) Transmission T01 C0080110 - L7012 Replacements and Upgrades Phas...

AI summary The document outlines various infrastructure projects across gas turbine, transmission, distribution, and general plant categories, including replacements, upgrades, and reconductor phases, with associated documents such as DCEs, vendor quotes, and planning studies.

Section 860
2026 ACE Plan Appendix C Page 1 of 9 NS Power 2025 Capital Spend Detail - As per 2025 ACE Plan 3rd Quarter Overview - as of September 30, 2025 Generation Distribution Transmission General Property Total NS Power 2025 ACE Plan Total 2025 Su...

AI summary The document provides a detailed overview of NS Power's 2025 Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including the total planned and actual spending across various sectors such as generation, distribution, transmission, and general property as of September 30, 2025. It highlights the variance between planned and actual spending and the percentage of the ACE Plan spent.

Section 861
0,337,289) Percentage of ACE Spent as of September 30, 2025 83% 81% 44% 72% 67% Add: ATOs 1,048,240 - 3,256,427 - 4,304,667 U&Us/P&As 6,703,770 1,256,042 - 1,493,832 9,453,644 Changes to ACE Items for Subsequent Approval 17,405,672 (382,50...

AI summary The text presents data on the percentage of Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) spent as of September 30, 2025, and includes figures for ATOs, U&Us/P&As, changes to ACE items, total increases, and decreases due to project cancellations and deferrals.

Section 862
5) Total Decrease (11,596,977) (322,774) (36,518,253) (11,848,193) (60,286,197) 2025 Potential Capital Spend $ 201,683,943 $ 183,119,650 $ 202,212,638 $ 64,296,036 $ 651,312,267 Total YTD Transmission spend includes ($11M) of proceeds rece...

AI summary The text provides an overview of capital spending and project status for NS Power, including a total decrease in spending and details on the 2025 potential capital spend. It also outlines the status of capital items as of September 30, 2025.

Section 864
ACE Plan Reference Submission or Status Category CI Number Title Submission/Date ACE Amount Actual Spend FIN Submission Date FIN Amount Variance (or U&U and P&A) Approved Amount Less than $1M General Plant C0061285 IT - Enterprise Governan...

AI summary The document provides a summary of various capital expenditure plans under the ACE Plan, including their status, category, cost estimates, and actual spending. It outlines projects such as IT governance, hydroelectric redevelopment, and dynamic line rating implementation.

Section 865
d Generation 49634 HYD - Trout River Diversion Structure Replacement 2022 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) Q1 - May 13, 2024 $ 1,822,300 $ 3,402,776 $ 3,309,528 Approved Distribution C0008638 Cogswell HRM Redevelopment Program 2022 ACE P...

AI summary The document lists various approved and awaiting approval capital expenditure projects related to generation, distribution, and transmission in Nova Scotia, with references to different ACE Plans and associated costs.

Section 866
1 $ 2,446,051 $ 2,550,603 Approved Distribution 51493 2018 PCB Pole Top Transformer Replacement 2018 ACE Plan 2018 ACE Plan $ 1,360,354 $ 1,360,354 $ 1,384,292 Approved Transmission 51403 2018 PCB Removal Program 2018 ACE Plan 2018 ACE Pla...

AI summary The text contains a table of approved capital expenditure items related to distribution and transmission projects, including pole top transformer replacement, PCB removal, and steel tower refurbishment, under the 2018 ACE Plan and other related plans.

Section 867
279,271 $ 1,279,271 $ 1,307,910 Approved Transmission 51975 5P Mobile Substation Replacement 2018 ACE Plan 2018 ACE Plan $ 4,829,458 $ 4,829,458 $ 2,970,055 Awaiting Approval Transmission 51956 6P Mobile Substation Rewind U&U U&U Q3 2017 -...

AI summary The document presents a table containing various capital expenditure items related to transmission, distribution, and generation projects, including their approval status, associated costs, and planning details. These items are tied to different ACE Plans and include projects such as mobile substation replacements, advanced metering infrastructure, and facility repairs.

Section 868
2018 ACE Plan $ 1,234,178 $ 1,234,178 $ 914,558 Withdrawn Generation 29807 HYD - Tusket Falls Main Dam 2017 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) OTQ - July 23, 2021 $ 9,940,664 $ 36,826,119 $ 25,568,901 Approved Generation 51234 HYD - WRC HV...

AI summary The text outlines several approved and withdrawn capital expenditure items under various ACE Plans, including details on projects such as HVAC upgrades, safety standards improvements, and automation initiatives. It provides financial figures for each item, including approved amounts and dates of approval or withdrawal.

Section 869
l) Q2 2015 - July 31, 2015 $ 2,379,999 $ 3,802,446 $ 4,026,586 Deferred General Plant 49600 IT - Network Architecture Redesign 2017 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 1,183,826 $ - Approved General Plant 49855 IT Desktop SW Modernization...

AI summary The text presents a table listing various approved and deferred capital expenditure items related to IT and transmission projects, along with associated costs and timelines, referencing the 2016 and 2017 ACE Plans.

Section 870
s 2017 ACE Plan OTQ - April 16, 2018 $ 1,261,920 $ 2,590,269 $ 2,837,177 Approved Transmission 49779 L6537 Replacements and Upgrades 2018 ACE Plan OTQ - March 4, 2019 $ 1,255,220 $ 2,331,474 $ 2,284,616 Approved Transmission 52320 L6549 20...

AI summary The text presents a table of approved capital expenditures under various ACE Plans, including project details, approval dates, and financial figures. It includes line items such as replacements, upgrades, and control system improvements, with associated costs and approvals.

Section 871
em Upgrade 2017 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) OTQ - July 3, 2018 $ 1,018,769 $ 1,275,559 $ 1,070,506 Approved Transmission C0001900 Mount Hope 69-25kV Substation 2018 ACE Plan 2018 ACE Plan $ 2,982,338 $ 2,982,338 $ 2,998,218 Approved...

AI summary This document outlines various capital expenditure projects related to transmission and general plant upgrades, including approvals and disapprovals. It includes details such as project names, costs, and approval statuses, with some items not approved at this time.

Section 872
2 $ 3,693,033 $ 2,691,017 $ 2,691,017 Not Approved at this time Transmission 43324 Replace L6513 / Upgrade Line Terminals 2015 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) OTQ - January 27, 2022 $ 23,429,902 $ 18,626,428 $ 18,625,082 Not Approved at...

AI summary The text presents a list of projects related to transmission and generation, including their approval status, costs, and associated ACE plans. Some projects are approved, while others are not approved at this time. The projects include line terminal upgrades, substation additions, and dam refurbishments.

Section 873
2019 ACE Plan $ 3,099,862 $ 3,099,862 $ 3,244,208 Approved Transmission C0010952 2019/2020 Substation Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Equipment2019 Removal ACE Plan 2019 ACE Plan $ 2,786,245 $ 2,786,245 $ 2,792,347 Approved Transmission C00...

AI summary The text lists various approved transmission projects under the 2019 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including the removal of PCB equipment, steel tower life extension, and replacements and upgrades for transmission switches and breakers, with associated costs and approvals.

Section 874
2019 ACE Plan $ 1,044,148 $ 1,044,148 $ 1,029,498 Approved Transmission C0011243 L5551 - Replacements and Upgrades 2019 ACE Plan 2019 ACE Plan $ 1,014,077 $ 1,014,077 $ 1,115,386 Approved Distribution C0011208 2019 Padmount Replacement Pro...

AI summary The text presents financial details for various projects under the 2019 and 2020 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plans, including approved and partially approved items with associated costs and references to pending submissions and orders.

Section 875
2020 ACE Plan (2019 Pending Submission) OTQ - February 21, 2020 $ 109,691,967 $ 101,787,264 $ 103,396,872 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 446 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix C Page 3 of 9 NS...

AI summary The document provides an overview of the 2020 ACE Plan and includes an update on the status of NS Power capital items as of September 30, 2025, detailing active projects submitted to the NSEB and subsequent submittals.

Section 877
ACE Plan Reference Submission or Status Category CI Number Title Submission/Date ACE Amount Actual Spend FIN Submission Date FIN Amount Variance (or U&U and P&A) Approved Amount Approved Distribution 47794 Heckman's Island Submarine Cable...

AI summary The document presents a table summarizing various capital expenditure (ACE) plans, including their status, category, CI number, title, submission dates, approved amounts, actual spend, and variance. The table includes projects such as the Heckman's Island Submarine Cable Replacement and Route Network Upgrades.

Section 878
proved General Plant C0010838 MCC - HVAC Replacement 2019 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) OTQ - October 4, 2021 $ 1,071,364 $ 1,606,254 $ 1,531,910 Approved General Plant C0002137 ECC - Map Board and Technology Modernization 2019 ACE Pl...

AI summary The document outlines several approved and pending capital expenditure items related to infrastructure upgrades, including HVAC replacement, technology modernization, and power line expansions, with associated costs and approval dates.

Section 879
4,707,040 Approved Transmission C0021123 2020/2021 Substation Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Equipment2020 Removal ACE Plan 2020 ACE Plan $ 5,197,372 $ 5,197,372 $ 5,482,882 Approved Generation 49949 LM6000 TUC4 Control System Replacement...

AI summary The document lists several approved capital expenditures under the 2020 ACE Plan, including PCB equipment removal, control system replacements, and infrastructure upgrades across transmission and distribution systems in Nova Scotia.

Section 880
ransmission C0021122 2020/2021 Transmission Switch & Breaker Replacement 2020 ACE Plan 2020 ACE Plan $ 1,312,643 $ 1,312,643 $ 1,518,310 Approved Distribution C0020834 2020/2021 Inaccessible PCB Transformer Replacements 2020 ACE Plan 2020...

AI summary The document lists various approved capital expenditure projects under the 2020 ACE Plan, including transmission switch and breaker replacements, transformer replacements, and new RTU deployments, with associated costs and approvals.

Section 881
Transmission C0021142 19W-T51 Transformer Replacement 2020 ACE Plan 2020 ACE Plan $ 1,512,336 $ 1,512,336 $ 1,473,279 Approved Distribution C0021182 93V-313-Meteghan Rebuild 2020 ACE Plan 2020 ACE Plan $ 1,075,625 $ 1,075,625 $ 927,225 App...

AI summary The text presents a list of capital expenditure projects approved or under consideration as part of the 2020 and 2021 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plans, including transformer replacement, infrastructure rebuilds, and smart grid initiatives, with associated costs and approval statuses.

Section 882
3 Approved General Plant C0023623 AMO Distribution APM Program 2020 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) OTQ - April 6, 2020 $ 1,708,240 $ 1,721,484 $ 1,817,942 Approved Generation 16374 HYD Gaspereau Dam Safety 2008 ACE Plan OTQ - February...

AI summary The document lists several approved capital expenditure projects, including distribution and transmission initiatives, with associated costs and approval dates, primarily under the 2020 and 2021 ACE Plans.

Section 883
$ 7,055,536 Approved Transmission C0031089 2021/2022 Transmission Right-of-Way Widening 69kV 2021 ACE Plan 2021 ACE Plan $ 5,288,520 $ 5,288,520 $ 5,512,846 Approved Transmission C0031122 L6539 Replacements and Upgrades 2021 ACE Plan OTQ -...

AI summary The text contains a list of approved capital expenditures related to transmission and distribution projects under the 2021 ACE Plan, including line replacements, transformer upgrades, and tower refurbishments, with associated costs and approvals.

Section 884
1,944,005 $ 2,205,105 Approved Distribution C0031145 2021 Padmount Replacement Program 2021 ACE Plan 2021 ACE Plan $ 1,636,153 $ 1,636,153 $ 1,176,604 Approved Transmission C0031262 2020/2021 Transmission Switch and Breaker Replacement 202...

AI summary This document presents a list of approved capital expenditures across various categories such as distribution, transmission, generation, and general plant, with associated costs and references to the 2021 and 2022 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plans. Some entries mention pending submissions or subsequent approvals.

Section 885
$ 1,259,927 $ 1,309,293 Approved Distribution C0041892 New Distribution Rights-of-Way Phase 7 2022 ACE Plan 2022 ACE Plan $ 9,854,291 $ 9,854,291 $ 10,221,584 Approved Transmission C0041893 2022/2023 Transmission Right-of-Way Widening 69kV...

AI summary The document presents a list of approved capital expenditures related to distribution and transmission projects under the 2022 ACE Plan. These include projects such as new distribution rights-of-way, transmission right-of-way widening, PCB equipment removal, and anodes installation, with associated costs and approvals.

Section 886
2,910,451 OTQ - October 10, 2025 $ 2,910,451 $ (272,067) Approved Transmission C0041989 2022/2023 Sacrificial Anode Installation Program 2022 ACE Plan 2022 ACE Plan $ 3,015,107 $ 3,015,107 $ 2,773,423 Deferred Transmission C0041794 L5031 R...

AI summary The document provides a summary of various capital expenditure projects related to transmission, distribution, and generation in Nova Scotia, including approved and awaiting approval items under the 2022 ACE Plan, with associated costs and funding details.

Section 887
$ 1,362,281 $ 1,362,281 $ 1,414,118 Awaiting Approval Transmission C0043010 2022/2023 Wood Pole Retreatment Program 2022 ACE Plan 2022 ACE Plan $ 1,300,037 $ 1,300,037 $ 791,054 OTQ - October 10, 2025 $ 791,054 $ (508,983) Approved Transmi...

AI summary The document outlines various capital expenditure items related to transmission and generation projects under the 2022 ACE Plan, including approved and deferred projects with associated costs and funding details.

Section 889
2022 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) Q4 - February 6, 2023 $ 1,110,293 $ 2,734,313 $ 2,756,903 Approved Transmission C0010956 78W-Martin’s Brook Substation Relocation P&A OTQ - March 3, 2025 $ - $ 5,122,761 $ 4,690,775 Approved Transmis...

AI summary The document outlines the status of capital items under the 2022 and 2026 ACE Plans, providing financial details for various transmission projects. It includes information on approved projects, their costs, and the current status as of September 30, 2025.

Section 891
ACE Plan Reference Submission or Status Category CI Number Title Submission/Date ACE Amount Actual Spend FIN Submission Date FIN Amount Variance (or U&U and P&A) Approved Amount Approved Transmission C0041807 L5534 Replacements and Upgrade...

AI summary The document outlines approved capital expenditures for transmission-related projects in Nova Scotia, including replacements, upgrades, and refurbishments. It provides details on the approved amounts, actual spending, and variances for specific projects submitted under the ACE Plan.

Section 892
7 Approved Transmission C0052055 2023/2024 Transmission Right-of-Way Widening 69kV P&A OTQ - December 5, 2022 $ - $ 5,332,315 $ 4,826,689 Approved Distribution C0052056 New Distribution Rights-of-Way Phase 8 P&A OTQ - December 5, 2022 $ -...

AI summary The document lists several approved capital expenditures related to transmission, distribution, and generation in Nova Scotia, including project names, approval dates, and associated costs. These projects are part of the 2023 ACE Plan and other initiatives, with some costs related to unbundled usage and purchases.

Section 893
13,067,325 Approved Generation C0012838 HYD - Lequille Canal Dyke, Gates and Tailrace Refurbishment 2023 ACE Plan 2023 ACE Plan $ 7,058,816 $ 7,058,816 $ 5,666,283 Approved Generation C0029682 CT VJ2 - Replace Generator Assembly 2023 ACE P...

AI summary The document lists several approved capital expenditure projects under the 2023 ACE Plan, including generation and transmission upgrades, with associated costs and funding details.

Section 894
463 $ 771,268 Approved Transmission C0055796 2023 EHV Breaker Replacements 2023 ACE Plan OTQ - October 2, 2023 $ 2,048,411 $ 3,463,489 $ 489,115 Approved Transmission C0055696 L5031 Replacement and Upgrades Robinson Corner Tap 2023 ACE Pla...

AI summary The text provides a list of approved capital expenditures related to transmission, distribution, and generation projects under the 2023 ACE Plan. These include items such as breaker replacements, padmount replacements, and turbine valve refurbishments, with associated costs and approvals.

Section 895
31,170,675 $ 32,729,208 Approved General Plant C0042166 IT - Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Platform 2023 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) OTQ - June 7, 2023 $ 3,233,905 $ 4,261,239 $ 3,944,010 Approved Generation C0051894 TUC - HFO Tank 3 R...

AI summary The document contains a list of approved capital expenditures under the 2023 ACE Plan, including items such as IT infrastructure upgrades, HFO tank refurbishment, and transformer replacements, with associated costs and approval dates.

Section 896
OTQ - June 7, 2023 $ 1,557,471 $ 2,315,457 $ 2,310,350 Approved Generation C0048591 CT VJ1 Engine P686621 Refurbishment P&A OTQ - March 6, 2023 $ - $ 2,312,509 $ 2,283,878 Approved Generation C0054356 TUC – Roof Replacement U&U U&U OTQ - M...

AI summary This text provides a summary of approved capital expenditures and related costs for various projects, including engine refurbishments, roof replacements, and infrastructure upgrades. It includes references to specific plans such as the 2021 and 2024 ACE Plans, and details associated costs and approvals.

Section 897
2024 ACE Plan $ 15,722,669 $ 15,722,669 $ 9,787,743 Approved General Plant C0047277 IT - GIS Utility Network Upgrade 2024 ACE Plan 2024 ACE Plan $ 6,175,230 $ 6,175,230 $ 3,336,285 Approved Generation C0049013 HYD - Lower Great Brook Log H...

AI summary The text presents a table with financial details related to the 2024 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including approved projects, their respective categories, cost estimates, and other financial figures.

Section 898
CE Plan 2024 ACE Plan $ 4,264,777 $ 5,965,028 $ 5,921,807 Approved Transmission C0056240 2024/2025 Transmission Switch and Breaker Replacements 2024 ACE Plan 2024 ACE Plan $ 3,271,622 $ 3,271,622 $ 3,081,411 Approved Distribution C0057142...

AI summary The document outlines approved capital expenditure items under the 2024 ACE Plan, including transmission and distribution projects, equipment replacements, and turbine refurbishments, with detailed funding allocations.

Section 899
2024 ACE Plan 2024 ACE Plan $ 2,472,311 $ 2,472,311 $ 562,396 Approved Generation C0060707 CT BGT1 Generator Refurbishment 2024 ACE Plan 2024 ACE Plan $ 3,482,602 $ 3,482,602 $ 7,684 Approved Distribution C0060749 2024 Padmount Replacement...

AI summary The text outlines various approved capital expenditure items under the 2024 ACE Plan, including generator refurbishment, padmount replacement, and breaker replacements, along with associated costs and funding sources.

Section 900
lation Program 2024 ACE Plan 2024 ACE Plan $ 2,382,113 $ 2,382,113 $ 2,586,372 Approved Transmission C0061545 L6006 Replacements and Upgrades 2024 ACE Plan 2024 ACE Plan $ 5,032,640 $ 5,032,640 $ 6,015,794 Approved Transmission C0061546 L6...

AI summary The text presents a table of approved capital expenditures under the 2024 ACE Plan, detailing various transmission projects with associated costs and approvals.

Section 901
t 2024 ACE Plan 2024 ACE Plan $ 1,032,911 $ 1,032,911 $ 1,485,549 Approved Transmission C0061883 129H - Kearney Lake Substation Rebuild 2024 ACE Plan 2024 ACE Plan $ 1,017,322 $ 1,017,322 $ 53,949 Approved General Plant C0054755 IT - Conne...

AI summary The text presents a table of capital expenditures under the 2024 ACE Plan, including project approvals, deferrals, and pending approvals, with details on costs and timelines for various infrastructure and IT projects.

Section 902
POT - HFO Tank Refurbishment 2024 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) OTQ - December 17, 2024 $ 2,012,803 $ 3,684,622 $ 3,628,104 Deferred General Plant C0061287 IT - Third Party Risk Management 2024 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 1,4...

AI summary The text presents a list of capital expenditure items related to the 2024 ACE Plan, including refurbishment of HFO tanks, IT risk management, network security design, and rights-of-way for distribution, with associated costs and approval statuses.

Section 903
2023 ACE Plan (Less than $1M) Q1 - May 13, 2024 $ 913,947 $ 1,225,491 $ 1,291,556 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 448 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix C Page 5 of 9 NS Power Capital Item Statu...

AI summary This document provides an overview of the 2023 and 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plans, including funding amounts and project status updates. It highlights the current status of capital items submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as of September 30, 2025.

Section 905
ACE Plan Reference Submission or Status Category CI Number Title Submission/Date ACE Amount Actual Spend FIN Submission Date FIN Amount Variance (or U&U and P&A) Approved Amount Approved Generation C0059283 LIN2 PE 2023/2024 Winter Capacit...

AI summary The table presents information on approved capital expenditures (ACE) in Nova Scotia, including project titles, categories, CI numbers, submission dates, approved amounts, actual spend, and variances. Projects include winter capacity requirements, substation upgrades, and IT infrastructure improvements.

Section 906
Transmission C0031048 91H-T11 Transformer Replacement 2025 ACE Plan 2025 ACE Plan $ 6,914,622 $ 6,914,622 $ 85,570 Approved Generation C0039266 HYD - Gulch Overhaul 2025 ACE Plan 2025 ACE Plan $ 1,371,379 $ 1,371,379 $ 287,049 Approved Gen...

AI summary The document lists several approved and pending capital expenditure projects under the 2025 ACE Plan, including transformer replacements, switchgear upgrades, and RTU replacements, with associated costs and approvals.

Section 907
1,192,508 Approved Transmission C0053295 L5004 Kearney Lake Structure Replacement 2025 ACE Plan 2025 ACE Plan $ 2,478,537 $ 2,478,537 $ 304,281 Approved Transmission C0057682 Spare Transformer Replacement 2025 ACE Plan 2025 ACE Plan $ 2,28...

AI summary This document lists several approved capital expenditures related to transmission, generation, and distribution projects under the 2025 ACE Plan, including costs and other financial details for each project.

Section 908
$ 1,615,312 Approved Distribution C0068952 2025 PCB Poletop Sampling and Replacement 2025 ACE Plan 2025 ACE Plan $ 7,158,974 $ 7,158,974 $ 1,557,845 Approved Distribution C0068953 2025 PCB Light Replacement 2025 ACE Plan 2025 ACE Plan $ 4,...

AI summary The document outlines several approved capital expenditure projects under the 2025 ACE Plan, including PCB sampling and replacement, light replacement, and substation upgrades, with associated costs and funding details.

Section 909
3,093,176 $ 1,223,077 Approved Transmission C0069232 L6021 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 2025 ACE Plan 2025 ACE Plan $ 3,253,068 $ 3,253,068 $ 1,614,847 Approved Transmission C0069238 2025/2026 Steel Tower Refurbishment 2025 ACE Plan 2...

AI summary The text lists several approved capital expenditures under the 2025 ACE Plan, including transmission and distribution upgrades, SCADA/EMS system improvements, and microwave radio replacements. Some projects are deferred, such as the HYD - Tusket Facility Refurbishment.

Section 910
1,572,478 $ 1,572,478 $ - Deferred Generation 48913 HYD - Tusket Facility Refurbishment 2025 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 12,972,226 $ 1,078,895 Deferred Transmission C0011358 New Bridgewater Substation 2025 ACE Plan (for Subsequen...

AI summary The text presents a list of projects under the 2025 ACE Plan, including deferred and approved items related to generation and transmission, with associated costs and approval statuses. Key projects include the Tusket Facility Refurbishment, New Bridgewater Substation, and the Eastern Clean Energy Initiative (ECEI) - Transmission.

Section 911
$ 5,062,652 $ 5,644,468 $ 4,635,351 Approved Generation C0059783 HYD Upper Lake Falls 2 Overhaul 2025 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) OTQ - September 9, 2025 $ 1,678,153 $ 1,582,014 $ 27,269 Approved General Plant C0061284 IT - OT Cyber...

AI summary The text presents a list of approved and awaiting approval capital expenditures, including details such as project names, approval statuses, and associated costs. These expenditures are related to the 2025 ACE Plan and are subject to various approvals and orders.

Section 912
- May 16, 2025 $ 1,440,911 $1,544,190 $ 340,357 Awaiting Approval Generation C0068655 LM6000 191-332 Life Extension 2025 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) Q2 - August 5, 2025 $ 6,013,454 $ 18,948,560 $ 18,457,860 Pending Submission Genera...

AI summary The document outlines various capital expenditure items related to generation and distribution, including pending approvals and submissions, with associated costs and timelines, all under the 2025 ACE Plan for subsequent approval.

Section 913
l) OTQ - July 7, 2025 $ 3,255,440 $ 2,530,405 $ 1,843,307 Approved Generation C0067906 POA Boiler Refurbishment 2025 2025 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) OTQ - July 7, 2025 $ 1,213,152 $ 1,218,254 $ 1,525,527 Approved Generation C006790...

AI summary The text lists various approved capital expenditures, including boiler refurbishments, system upgrades, and infrastructure conversions, with associated costs and approval dates, primarily under the 2025 ACE Plan and other related plans.

Section 914
(Less than $1M) Q1 - May 16, 2025 $ 534,006 $ 1,241,640 $ 1,065,703 Approved Generation C0073348 HYD - WRC Surge Lake Volume Optimization U&U Q1 - May 16, 2025 $ - $ 1,736,278 $ 691,019 Approved Generation C0073965 TRE5 U&U Burner Nest Wat...

AI summary The document presents a list of approved and awaiting approval capital expenditure items, including details such as project names, costs, and approval dates. These items are categorized under different headings such as Generation and General Plant, with associated costs and funding sources.

Section 915
U&U Q2 - August 5, 2025 $ - $ 2,426,669 $ 445,032 Approved Transmission C0074130 Robie Street Underground P&A OTQ - September 9, 2025 $ - $ 4,465,119 $ 1,221,314 Awaiting Approval Generation C0080112 HYD Big Falls Unit 6 Rotor Re-Insulatio...

AI summary The text provides a table listing various projects with their status, costs, and associated dates. These projects include transmission, generation, and general plant initiatives, with some awaiting approval and others already approved. Costs and associated details are provided for each item.

Section 916
2026 ACE Plan 2026 ACE Plan $ 2,818,855 $ 2,818,855 $ 66,043 Awaiting Approval Transmission C0053234 96H-T1 Transformer Replacement 2026 ACE Plan 2026 ACE Plan $ 2,056,752 $ 2,056,752 $ 21,093 Awaiting Approval Generation C0068888 TUC3 Con...

AI summary The text presents a list of capital expenditure items under the 2026 ACE Plan, including transformer replacements, system upgrades, and switch replacements, with associated costs and approval status.

Section 917
2026 ACE Plan 2026 ACE Plan $ 2,074,494 $ 2,074,494 $ 72,103 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 449 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix C Page 6 of 9 NS Power Capital Item Status Update 3rd Quarter...

AI summary This document provides an overview of the 2026 ACE Plan, including a capital item status update as of September 30, 2025. It outlines active projects submitted to the NSEB and explains when projects are removed from the report.

Section 919
ACE Plan Reference Submission or Status Category CI Number Title Submission/Date ACE Amount Actual Spend FIN Submission Date FIN Amount Variance (or U&U and P&A) Approved Amount Awaiting Approval Transmission C0070909 70W-T52 Transformer A...

AI summary The document presents a table outlining several capital items (CIs) under the 2026 ACE Plan, including their status, category, CI numbers, titles, submission dates, ACE amounts, actual spend, and variance. These items are related to infrastructure upgrades in transmission and distribution systems.

Section 920
on C0080110 L7012 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 2026 ACE Plan 2026 ACE Plan $ 5,370,318 $ 5,370,318 $ - Awaiting Approval General Plant C0080111 2026 RTU Deployment 2026 ACE Plan 2026 ACE Plan $ 8,322,655 $ 8,322,655 $ - Awaiting Appro...

AI summary The text presents a list of capital expenditure items under the 2026 ACE Plan, including replacements, upgrades, and refurbishments across various projects, with associated costs listed for each item.

Section 921
C0080206 POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 2026 ACE Plan 2026 ACE Plan $ 1,304,600 $ 1,304,600 $ - Awaiting Approval General Plant C0080252 Intelligent Asset Data Capture & Integration Platform 2026 ACE Plan 2026 ACE Plan $ 267,941 $ 267,941 $...

AI summary The text lists several capital expenditure projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including boiler refurbishments, asset data integration platforms, distribution right of way expansions, and various hydroelectric refurbishment and analysis projects. Some are awaiting approval, while others are pending submission.

Section 922
595 HYD - TUS 1 Overhaul 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 5,649,954 $ 310,075 Pending Submission Transmission 51098 L-6014 Shannon Park Transmission Towers 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 39,471,723 $ 1,476,385 Pending S...

AI summary The text lists various capital expenditure projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including infrastructure overhauls, software implementations, and transmission tower upgrades, with associated costs and approvals pending.

Section 923
02 Sydney Depot Improvements 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 2,700,000 $ - Pending Submission Transmission C0032382 142H - Susie Lake Substation 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 8,256,386 $ 671,904 Pending Submission Gen...

AI summary The document lists several capital expenditure items under the 2026 ACE Plan, including improvements to the Sydney Depot, Susie Lake Substation, and various IT and generation-related projects, with associated costs and approvals pending.

Section 924
HYD ANN Facility Isolation 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 4,083,925 $ 2,778,287 Pending Submission Transmission C0059483 83V L-5017 and L-5046 Rebuild Tap 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 1,207,318 $ 212,714 Pending Sub...

AI summary The document outlines several capital expenditure projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including facility isolation, transmission rebuilds, IT migrations, and environmental upgrades, with varying amounts approved and pending.

Section 925
IT - Managed Detect & Respond 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 2,585,071 $ 140,002 Pending Submission General Plant C0068714 IT - Identity & Access Management 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 4,324,589 $ 914,563 Pending S...

AI summary The text lists several IT and transmission projects with associated costs under the 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval), including IT security, DERMS solutions, ADMS upgrades, and transformer replacements.

Section 926
10H-T2 Transformer Replacement 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 2,878,891 $ 20,582 Pending Submission Transmission C0070327 IR 673 Network Upgrade Benjamins Mill Wind 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 265,000 $ 7,946 Pendi...

AI summary The text lists various capital expenditure projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including transformer replacements, network upgrades, and the construction of a new substation, with associated costs and approvals pending.

Section 927
HYD Malay Falls Rubber Dam 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 2,237,339 $ 42,684 Pending Submission Generation C0076273 Bear Head Ash Management Site - Life Extension 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 10,148,108 $ 18,725 Pen...

AI summary The document outlines several pending submissions related to capital expenditures under the 2026 ACE Plan, including projects such as the Malay Falls Rubber Dam, Bear Head Ash Management Site life extension, and various infrastructure upgrades across generation, distribution, and transmission systems.

Section 928
Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 2,490,532 $ - Pending Submission Generation C0080219 HYD Deep Brook Spillway & Intake Refurbishment 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 3,142,201 $ 4,250 Pen...

AI summary This text outlines various capital expenditure projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including turbine refurbishments, infrastructure upgrades, and other initiatives, with associated costs and pending approvals.

Section 929
se 2 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 13,000,000 $ 2,875,292 Pending Submission General Plant C0082133 IT - Renew Microsoft Enterprise Agreement 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) $ 1,800,000 $ - Pending Submission Generation...

AI summary The text outlines the 2026 ACE Plan (for Subsequent Approval) with specific line items related to IT and generation capacity requirements, along with deferred or cancelled projects from the 2025 ACE Plan. These projects are part of broader planning and capital expenditure processes.

Section 930
9 NS Power 2025 ACE Plan Items – Deferred or Cancelled 3rd Quarter Overview - as of September 30, 2025 This report includes any deferred or cancelled projects that were included in the 2025 ACE Plan. 2025 ACE 2025 ACE Project CI Project Ti...

AI summary The report outlines deferred or cancelled projects from the 2025 ACE Plan, including the HYD - Tusket Facility Refurbishment and TRE5 Stack Expansion Joint Replacement. The Tusket project is deferred to 2027 due to additional engineering requirements, while the TRE5 project is deferred to 2026 with risk mitigation measures.

Section 931
Deferred 2026 Less than $1M Through further scoping it was determined the risk could be mitigated in 2025 with additional monitoring and detection. C0020331 TRE5 Air Heater Expansion Joint Replacement 354,575 385,222 Deferred 2026 Less tha...

AI summary Several projects related to infrastructure upgrades and maintenance have been deferred or cancelled due to risk mitigation strategies, additional monitoring, and updated condition assessments. These decisions aim to optimize resource allocation and ensure that necessary actions are taken based on current evaluations.

Section 932
Cancelled Pt. Aconi This project has been cancelled, as updated condition assessment revealed the risk does not need immediate mitigation. C0060572 TUC1 Secondary Air & Recirculation Damper Replacement 77,424 77,424 Cancelled Less than $1M...

AI summary Several projects related to TUC1 and TUC2 have been cancelled or deferred. The cancellations are due to risks being manageable through 2026 and integration into a major boiler upgrade starting in 2027. One project was deferred to 2027 for further scoping and engineering.

Section 933
Less than $1M This project has been cancelled, as the risk can be managed through 2026 and will also be completed as part of a major boiler upgrade on TUC1 which will begin in 2027. C0068303 LIN Wastewater Lagoon Algae Control 2025 102,074...

AI summary Several projects under the LIN and TRE categories have been either cancelled or deferred to 2026 due to effective risk management practices and updated condition assessments. These include wastewater lagoon algae control, north water wall replacement, air preheater seal refurbishment, and sewage lift station upgrades.

Section 934
2026 Less than $1M This project is being deferred to 2026 outage. The existing approach to management of this asset is expected to address near-term risks. C0061363 TRE5 - Screenwash Pump Replacement 129,989 151,107 Deferred 2026 Less than...

AI summary Several capital projects related to Thermal Recovery Equipment (TRE) have been deferred or cancelled due to updated condition assessments and risk management strategies. These decisions are based on the existing approach to asset management being sufficient to address near-term risks, and some risks being managed through other capital items.

Section 935
Less than $1M Deferred due to U&U capital work utilizing available resources. The existing approach to management of this asset is expected to address near-term risks. C0068691 TRE6 - Boiler Main Stop Valve 148,839 162,539 Deferred 2026 Le...

AI summary Several capital projects under the U&U (Unbundled Usage) program have been deferred or cancelled due to the utilization of available resources and the need to better define project scope. These include boiler valve refurbishments, instrument air dry replacements, and fire protection systems. The existing management approach is expected to address near-term risks.

Section 936
elled Less than $1M This project has been cancelled. Project scope will be completed as part of CI C0069829 TUC - Relay Room Fire Suppression System. C0068906 TUC6 Boiler Feed Pump Refurbishment 2025 302,097 302,097 Deferred 2026 Less than...

AI summary Several projects related to infrastructure upgrades and maintenance have been deferred or cancelled due to reprioritization, budget constraints, or the need for further scoping. These include boiler feed pump refurbishment, facility isolation, penstock recoating, and battery bank replacement. The existing asset management approach is expected to address near-term risks.

Section 937
rred 2027 Less than $1M Deferred due to reprioritization. The existing approach to asset management of this asset is expected to address near-term risks. C0039046 LIN Ash Silo Refurbishment 2024 197,599 214,456 Cancelled Less than $1M This...

AI summary The document outlines several deferred and cancelled projects from the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including the 2027 project deferred due to reprioritization and two projects cancelled based on updated risk assessments. These decisions reflect a revised approach to asset management.

Section 938
9 NS Power 2025 ACE Plan Items – Deferred or Cancelled 3rd Quarter Overview - as of September 30, 2025 This report includes any deferred or cancelled projects that were included in the 2025 ACE Plan. 2025 ACE 2025 ACE Project CI Project Ti...

AI summary The 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for NS Power includes several deferred or cancelled projects, such as the LIN Coal Amenities Trailer Replacement and LIN Coal Stacker Refurbishment 2025. These projects were cancelled due to updated condition assessments indicating that the risks did not require immediate mitigation.

Section 939
Cancelled Less than $1M This project has been cancelled. Project scope will be completed as part of CI C0060819 LIN HFO/LFO Line Refurbishment 2024. C0068186 LIN Kubota Replacement 2025 36,674 43,972 Cancelled Less than $1M Cancelled due t...

AI summary Several projects under the Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) have been cancelled or deferred due to the utilization of available resources for Unbundled Usage (U&U) capital work. The existing approaches are deemed sufficient to address near-term risks, and the projects will be completed as part of other initiatives.

Section 940
Less than $1M Deferred due to U&U capital work utilizing available resources. The existing approach to management of this asset is expected to address near-term risks. C0059533 WIN - DIG Gearbox Replacement WTG19 716,489 761,741 Deferred 2...

AI summary The document outlines several capital projects deferred due to reprioritization or the need for additional engineering. These include gearbox replacements for wind turbines, spare cable replacement, and substation additions, with the expectation that existing asset management approaches will address near-term risks.

Section 941
5,149,415 13,954,518 Deferred 2026 Subsequent Submittal Additional engineering is required before project can progress to construction. C0053214 76W-T1 Transformer Replacement 1,938,848 2,279,295 Deferred 2026 Subsequent Submittal Project...

AI summary The text outlines several deferred and cancelled projects, primarily related to infrastructure and IT upgrades, with reasons including the need for additional engineering, reprioritization, and integration with other projects. These projects are scheduled for future submissions or approvals, notably in 2026.

Section 943
4,353,461 Deferred 2026 Subsequent Submittal This project is delayed due to the cyber event. Resources were required for priority restoration. C0068718 IT - DERMS Solution Project 1,950,047 2,993,200 Deferred 2026 Subsequent Submittal Defe...

AI summary The document lists several IT projects that have been deferred due to a cyber event, requiring resources for priority restoration. These include the IT - DERMS Solution Project, IT - Identity and Access Management, and IT - Managed Detect & Respond. All are part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan and were submitted as Subsequent Submittals.

Section 944
2026 ACE Plan Appendix C Page 9 of 9 NS Power Final Cost Report 3rd Quarter Overview - as of September 30, 2025 This report includes a list of all FIN capital work orders that have fallen outside the timelines under the CEJC. (Within six m...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan Appendix C lists capital work orders that have fallen outside the timelines under the CEJC. Projects such as the 2021 Padmount Replacement Program and the 6P Mobile Substation Rewind are either completed or forecast to be outside the allowed FIN tolerances. Final cost applications are planned for submission in 2026.

Section 945
SEB on December 1, 2025 52314 1C-GT1/UT1 Replacement 11/30/2020 2,032,393 1,678,006 FIN CWO submitted to NSEB on December 1, 2025 This project is now complete; however, the final cost application is being held until the functionality C0042...

AI summary The text provides information on several completed projects with pending final cost applications, including IT security upgrades, wood pole retreatment, and smart grid initiatives. These projects are being processed by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) under various proceedings, with final costs contingent on investigations and asset disposition processes.

Section 946
REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 1 of 179 CEJC Stakeholder Engagement Presentation Date: December 12, 2025 Page 454 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan...

AI summary The document outlines directives from the Board related to the 2025 and 2016 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plans, focusing on stakeholder engagement and the need to amend the Scope Change definition within the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) for the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 947
g proposed amendments in the 2026 ACE Plan. 2016 ACE Plan Directive: The Board’s 2016 ACE Plan (M07176) Order and Decision provided the following directive requiring stakeholder engagement: 4. The Board directs NSPI to discuss any changes...

AI summary The document discusses proposed amendments to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan), referencing the 2016 ACE Plan directive requiring stakeholder engagement before submitting changes to the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). The 2025 ACE Plan amendments were assumed approved, with some requests for clarification on ATO and Scope Change processes. References to UARB were updated to NSEB as per the Board’s request.

Section 948
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 6 of 179 New Updates - Scope Change • As discussed in the 2025 ACE Plan process, there is opportunity to clarify the definition of a Scope Change application in the...

AI summary The document discusses updates to the definition of a Scope Change application in the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) as outlined in the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It emphasizes the importance of clarifying when a project's intent changes, and outlines examples that would trigger a Scope Change application.

Section 949
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 7 of 179 New Updates - Scope Change • Examples that would trigger a Scope Change application: o The refurbishment (component replacement) of an asset is changed to a full asset replacement. (i.e. a Steam Turbi...

AI summary This section outlines the conditions under which a scope change would be required for the 2026 ACE Plan. Examples include changing from component replacement to full asset replacement or altering the technology application. However, changes in quantity of units without altering the project intent are not considered scope changes.

Section 950
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 8 of 179 New Updates – FIN • FINs often take more time to process than other capital applications, due to required final costing activities. • In particular, undersp...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D discusses challenges in processing FINs, particularly underspent ones, due to delays in final costing and unused contingency. It recommends adjusting the underspend threshold and extending the timeline for filing to improve regulatory efficiency.

Section 951
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 9 of 179 New Updates - Other • Removed “Revenue Requirement in ACE Plan” section, in alignment with 2022 ACE Plan Decision (M10366) • Addition of Retirement Informat...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan has been updated to remove the 'Revenue Requirement in ACE Plan' section in alignment with the 2022 ACE Plan Decision (M10366). Additional changes include the addition of Retirement Information and Contingency Information under Capital Application Requirements, in line with Board direction under Revised Accounting Policies (M09229) and the 2022 ACE Plan (M10366). Clarifications have been made regarding Routine ATO applications for sub-routines under $1 million, and minor edits in Thermal and Routines sections.

Section 952
Section Summary CEJC Detailed CEJC Substantive/ Revision Description (Summary/Detailed) Page # Page # Non-Substantive Definitions (1.0) 5-6 of 54 6 of 113 Substantive Modification of FIN definition and addition of Scope and Scope Change de...

AI summary The document outlines modifications to the FIN definition and the addition of Scope and Scope Change definitions in the Definitions section. It also notes the removal of the Revenue Requirement section from the Annual Capital Expenditure Plan, as per the Board's 2022 ACE Plan Decision, with the Board reserving the right to seek this information in future proceedings.

Section 954
This section is therefore outdated, and has been removed. Capital Application Requirements 27-28 of 54 45-46 of 113 Substantive Addition of Retirement Information and Contingency (11.2) Information as required information for capital appli...

AI summary The text outlines updates to capital application requirements, including the addition of retirement information and contingency details in line with accounting policies and the 2022 ACE Plan. It also mentions formatting improvements and clarifications on routine capital ATO applications.

Section 955
and actual spend is less than $1 million threshold, then no Routine ATO application for the specific sub-routine. Final Cost Application (FIN) 33 of 54 51 of 113 Substantive Amended underspend threshold from -5%/-$250,000 to - Requirements...

AI summary The document outlines adjustments to the Final Cost Application (FIN) process, including changes to the underspend threshold and timeline for filing. It also details minor edits to the Thermal section and Appendix A of the Nova Scotia Power Routine Program. These updates are part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

Section 956
TION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 14 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document TABLE OF CONTENTS

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) and includes an appendix related to capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria.

Section 957
Appendix D Page 14 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document TABLE OF CONTENTS

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s approach to capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria, providing a structured overview of the processes and considerations involved in planning and justifying capital expenditures.

Section 958
1.0 Defini ons ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Introduc on .......................................................................................

AI summary The document outlines the capital planning process for NS Power, including budgeting, execution, ranking, and economic analysis. It also discusses financial criteria, parameters, and the types of capital applications submitted for NSEB approval, along with the requirements for such approvals.

Section 959
26 11.1 General Requirements ......................................................................................... 26 11.2 Capital Applica on Requirements ....................................................................... 26 11.3...

AI summary This document outlines requirements related to capital applications, authorization to overspend, final cost applications, and routine expenditures. It includes sections on general requirements, capital cost incurrence, and confidentiality. The content is structured into numbered sections with subtopics detailing specific procedures and classifications.

Section 960
.......................................................................................... 38 16.0 Confiden ality ................................................................................................................. 39 17.0 Cap...

AI summary The document outlines confidentiality considerations and details the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria, including sections on innovation, health and safety, environment, land use, and system design.

Section 961
......................................................... 51 Month DD, YYYY Page 2 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 467 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 15 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Capital Planning and Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria, including sections on metering equipment, work support facilities, information technology, and vehicles. It also defines the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan as a document submitted annually to the NSEB detailing all planned capital projects.

Section 962
s Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan: A document containing details regarding all of NS Power’s capital projects planned for a given calendar year. The ACE Plan is submi ed to the NSEB every year. AuthorizaƟon to Overspend (ATO): A capi...

AI summary The text defines key terms related to capital expenditures and project management for Nova Scotia Power, including the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, Authorization to Overspend (ATO), and Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). These terms outline the planning, approval, and financial management of capital projects.

Section 963
). Discounted Payback Period: This is a measure of economic value. It represents the number of years required to pay back the ini al capital cost of a project. It measures the levered payback period. DiscreƟonary Project: Investments that...

AI summary The text discusses the Economic Analysis Model (EAM) used by Nova Scotia Power Inc. to calculate the present value of revenue requirements and economic value of projects. It also defines terms such as 'Discounted Payback Period' and 'Discretionary Project'.

Section 964
project. The so ware takes capital costs, avoided costs, revenue, expenses, and taxes into considera on to give a Net Present Value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and discounted payback period. Economically JusƟfied Project: A capit...

AI summary The text outlines various types of capital projects, including economically justified, environmental, and essential projects, and explains the use of the Economic Analysis Model (EAM) to assess their benefits. It also defines terms such as 'Final Cost (FIN)' and 'Individual Capital Item' and discusses the Integrated Resource Plan as a long-term planning framework for evaluating utility resources.

Section 965
an: A long-term planning process and framework within which the costs and benefits of both demand and supply side resources are evaluated to develop the least total cost mix of u lity resource op ons. InformaƟon Request (IR): A request fro...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing the evaluation of demand and supply-side resources, the role of the Investment Review Team, and the use of metrics like IRR in decision-making.

Section 966
vestment ini a ves are con nuously monitored and the status of the capital program is communicated to NS Power’s Leadership Team. Leadership Team: Senior Managers, Directors and Execu ve of NS Power. Nova ScoƟa Energy Board (NSEB): On Apri...

AI summary The text discusses the monitoring of capital investments and the transition of regulatory oversight from the Utility and Review Board to the Nova Scotia Energy Board. It also defines key terms such as 'Planned and Advanced' capital items and describes the PowerPlan software used for managing capital projects.

Section 967
m: A capital item containing a number of projects that are high volume, repe ve, like-for-like capital replacements, enhancements, or addi ons that are expected to con nue into the foreseeable future. Safety Project: A project that is jus...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria, including definitions of key terms like 'capital item,' 'safety project,' and 'special protection system.' It provides a framework for evaluating and approving capital projects based on their scope, safety, and long-term viability.

Section 968
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 19 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document NPCC Emergency Opera on Criteria A-3, is not considered a Special Protec on System. Conven onally sw...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria. It defines the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) as the sum of upfront capital costs and operating expenses over an asset's useful life. It also explains Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U) capital items, which are not included in prior or current ACE Plans. The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is used in the Economic Analysis Model (EAM) to assess the Net Present Value (NPV) of capital projects.

Section 969
(WACC) is determined by the Finance Team and incorporated into the Economic Analysis Model (EAM) in order to determine the Net Present Value (NPV) and discounted payback of a capital project Acronyms ACE Annual Capital Expenditure ACHI Avo...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s approach to capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria, including the use of the Economic Analysis Model (EAM) and the determination of the Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) for evaluating capital projects.

Section 970
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 20 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document NERC North American Electric Reliability Corpora on NPCC Northeast Power Coordina ng Council NPV Net...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and includes references to regulatory bodies and financial criteria used for capital planning and expenditure justification. It also references a 1995 ACE Plan decision by the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

Section 971
he U lity, the Company) file evidence rela ng to its 1995 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by January 12, 1995, and set March 6, 1995 as the commencement date for a hearing. In an exchange of correspondence between the Company and the...

AI summary The document outlines the process for NS Power's Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including the submission of evidence, the Board's oversight role, and the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). It also discusses changes to the Public Utilities Act, which raised the capital item approval threshold for large-scale utilities to $1,000,000.

Section 972
wer’s rate base. 1 1995 ACE Plan Board Decision (March 31, 1995) NS Power-P-866-DEC. Month DD, YYYY Page 9 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 474 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 22...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its commitment to managing capital expenditures in accordance with the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). The document will be maintained by NS Power and revised with stakeholder input before being filed with the Board for approval.

Section 973
s of the capital approval process. This begins during the development and submi al of the ACE Plan and con nues un l the project is complete and receives final cost approval. NS Power is commi ed to: • Delivering effec ve and efficient servic...

AI summary The Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) ensures NS Power uses consistent economic, financial, and technical standards to justify capital spending, aiming to maximize customer benefits and minimize rate impacts. The process begins with the submission of the ACE Plan and continues until final cost approval.

Section 974
proval of capital projects in a clear and structured manner; • To provide the assurance NS Power has appropriate levels of accountability regarding the oversight of the capital processes; • To ensure that the jus fica on criteria reflect a...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing accountability, oversight, and the use of consistent practices. The Investment Review Team (IRT) oversees the capital program, ensuring projects are prioritized and monitored effectively.

Section 975
capital projects that may be included in the ACE Plan. This requires coordina on between the genera on, transmission, distribu on and corporate groups, Asset Management, Finance and Regulatory Affairs. In Genera on, Transmission, Distribu o...

AI summary The document outlines the process for compiling and reviewing capital projects for inclusion in the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It involves coordination between various departments and the use of PowerPlan to input project details, including justification and cost profiles. Projects are ranked based on health and safety, environmental compliance, and business sustainability criteria.

Section 976
conomics (based on payback period, and revenue requirement); requirement to serve. Month DD, YYYY Page 13 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 478 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 26 o...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. evaluates technically justified IT projects based on customer impact, financial impact, compliance with regulations, and operational sustainability. The capital program includes essential projects for health, safety, regulatory compliance, service delivery, and risk mitigation. Projects improving customer reliability are assessed based on performance metrics like SAIDI, SAIFI, and CAIDI.

Section 977
rained by a number of factors including the ability to effec vely execute the annual program with the available me and resources, the maintenance cycle of the genera ng facili es and company cash flow. The NS Power Execu ve approval process...

AI summary The document outlines the process for developing and submitting the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by NS Power, including executive approval, project ranking, and submission to the NSEB. It emphasizes the flexibility of the capital program and the criteria used for project ranking.

Section 978
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 27 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document for the capital project are further defined. All ranking...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing the review process by an Investment Review Team. Projects are ranked based on criticality and condition, with colors indicating priority and risk levels. Multiple factors may influence rankings, and red indicates high priority.

Section 979
s represent projects that carry a higher risk than the projects in the green rankings. While the colours provide a visual illustra on of risk, the ranking numbers are the focus of the ranking process. A lower ranking suggests a lower level...

AI summary The document discusses the ranking methodology for projects based on risk levels, with lower rankings indicating lower risk but not necessarily lower priority. Projects may be completed during planned outages if asset conditions require action. The rankings are influenced by multiple factors and professional judgment from NS Power staff and third-party experts.

Section 980
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 28 of 179 ASSET MANAGEMENT CRITICALITY & CONDITION RISK ALIGNMENT MATRIX Criticality (Based on Consequence) CRITICALTY VALUE RISK MATRIX Health & Safety Environment Business Sustainability Consequence • Regula...

AI summary This section of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan Appendix D outlines an Asset Management Criticality & Condition Risk Alignment Matrix. It categorizes risks based on their impact on health and safety, the environment, and business sustainability, with a focus on regulatory requirements, safety incidents, and environmental impacts.

Section 986
per year and 1 in 10 operating years. Failure or occurrence is almost certain (91-100% ). Available data, past Almost Certain 5 experience and or subject matter expert input indicates an expected occurrence rate of greater than once per ye...

AI summary This document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Appendix D for Nova Scotia Power Inc., focusing on General Plant. It includes criteria for capital planning and expenditure justification, with references to risk levels and probabilities of failure or occurrence.

Section 987
EDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 30 of 179 General Plant Projects under General Plant primarily involve informa on technology, communica ons and facili es ini a ves. With the excep on of IT which is...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Appendix D discusses General Plant projects, which focus on information technology, communications, and facilities initiatives. Economic analysis is used to determine project feasibility, with the Economic Analysis Model (EAM) comparing revenue requirements and avoided costs to evaluate alternatives.

Section 988
wing are typical inputs into the model: • Capital investment profile • Opera ng cash flows, including avoided costs The model calculates the following: • Revenue requirement • Income tax associated with the capital expenditures • Discounte...

AI summary The document outlines a model used to evaluate capital investments, including revenue requirements, income tax, discounted net cash flow, and economic indicators like NPV and IRR. Avoided costs are calculated using probabilities of failure, capacity factors, and replacement energy costs, with inflation used as an escalator for future years.

Section 989
infla on as an escalator will be more closely examined and discussed with stakeholders. Month DD, YYYY Page 19 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 484 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page...

AI summary The document discusses the use of an economic analysis model (EAM) for capital expenditure justification, highlighting its simplicity, consistency, and ability to provide immediate economic insights. It also mentions limitations, such as the lack of monthly cash flow entry, and the inclusion of sensitivity analyses to test variances in capital spend and project timing.

Section 990
ty on what is included in the costs comprising each alterna ve. Addi onal clarifying notes, if necessary, can be wri en onto the “Notes/Comments” sec on on the first page/tab of the EAM. Administra ve Overhead (AO) - Project capital cost a...

AI summary The document outlines the inclusion of administrative overhead (AO) in the revenue requirement analysis for capital projects and discusses the potential impact of removing the AO credit on economically justified projects. It emphasizes the need for careful evaluation of AO credits to ensure appropriate project recommendations.

Section 991
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 33 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document

AI summary This document provides an overview of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan, focusing on capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria.

Section 992
Deleted: 6.3.2 Revenue Requirement DirecƟve in 6.3.3 Total Cost of Ownership Annual Capital Expenditure Plan¶ ¶ In the Board’s 2011 ACE Plan decision, the Board provided In the Board’s 2022 ACE Plan decision, the Board provided the followi...

AI summary The document discusses the 2011 and 2022 ACE Plan decisions by the Board, which direct NSPI to use Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for IT projects over $1 million when an Economic Analysis Model (EAM) is not available. It also outlines the requirement for NSPI to provide an approximate calculation of how the ACE Plan affects revenue requirements.

Section 993
ses over its expected useful life. It accounts for all the capital pursuant to the 2016 ACE Plan Terms of Consensus, NS Power also provides a version of the overall revenue and opera ng costs, including the upfront capital costs. In addi o...

AI summary The document discusses the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) as a tool for evaluating capital investments, emphasizing the alignment of the TCO timeframe with the useful life of IT software or hardware. It highlights that when capital expenditures match depreciation expenses, there is minimal impact on the rate base or customer revenue requirement.

Section 994
stment rather than a prescribed in a given year, there is minimal effect on rate base or meline. associated revenue requirement and therefore it is excluded from the calcula on.¶ impact considers the following inputs:¶ ¶ • Capital expenditu...

AI summary The text discusses the minimal impact of capital expenditures on rate base and revenue requirement, considering factors such as capital expenditures compared to depreciation expense and administrative overhead credit. It outlines the inputs used in the analysis.

Section 995
ased on the propor on of capital expenditures in excess of deprecia on expense of all assets in each year.¶ • Incremental interest based on the cost of debt mul plied by the por on of debt to total capital of the incremental rate base¶ • A...

AI summary The text outlines several financial components related to capital expenditures, including incremental interest, AFUDC, income taxes, and net earnings, all calculated based on the proportion of capital expenditures relative to depreciation expenses and the capital structure.

Section 996
eturn mul plied by the por on of equity to total capital of the incremental rate base.¶ • Addi onal fixed cost recovery received from customer growth achieved through capital investment to serve these customers.¶ Deprecia on expense and ad...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of revenue requirements in the context of the 2026 ACE Plan, highlighting depreciation expense and additional fixed cost recoveries. It notes that the method used does not fully account for certain factors, as indicated by the ellipsis.

Section 997
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 34 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document 7.0 Capital Planning Financial Criteria & Policies • NS...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s approach to capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria. It emphasizes the company's responsibility in developing financial criteria, accountability for functional areas, and the central management of capital planning. Policies and procedures are subject to approval by the Nova Scotia Energy Board and the Board through separate or integrated proceedings.

Section 998
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 35 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document 8.0 Financial Parameters The capital program is financed through a combina on of debt and equity. Th...

AI summary This section discusses the financial parameters used by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) in its capital planning, including the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and its use in calculating the Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC). It emphasizes the importance of financial factors such as cost of capital, depreciation, inflation, and investment risk in economic analysis.

Section 999
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 36 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document 9.0 Economic Analysis of AlternaƟves The guiding principle of economic analysis is to seek the most...

AI summary This document outlines the economic analysis of alternatives for capital projects under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan). It emphasizes the need to evaluate alternatives based on cost-effectiveness and value for customers and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI). The document also details the types of capital applications submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) for approval, including planned and unforeseen projects.

Section 1000
separate, or revised capital applica on). • Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U) capital projects. These projects are not included in the ACE Plan and are filed separately for Board approval. • Planned and Advanced (P&A) capital projects. These...

AI summary This document outlines the requirements for Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) to obtain approval from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) for various types of capital projects, including Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U), Planned and Advanced (P&A), Authority to Overspend (ATO), Scope Change, and Final Cost (FIN) applications.

Section 1001
provisions of the Public UƟliƟes Act (the Act). NS Power is subject to general supervisory oversight of the NSEB. Sec on 35 and Sec on 35AA (effec ve October 30, 2019) of the Act provide the following: 35 No public u lity shall proceed with...

AI summary The Public Utilities Act provisions outline capital expenditure thresholds requiring Board approval for NS Power. Section 35 mandates Board approval for projects exceeding $250,000, while Section 35AA exempts large-scale utilities (annual revenue ≥ $100M) from this requirement for projects ≤ $1M. The Board may approve, modify, or reject applications through various review processes, with NS Power retaining discretion to defer/cancel projects based on reassessment.

Section 1002
n in accordance with engineering, business judgment and resource availability. Any projects cancelled or deferred are reported in the Quarterly Capital Reports. 11.2 Capital ApplicaƟon Requirements Suppor ng documenta on is provided with e...

AI summary The document outlines capital application requirements for Nova Scotia Power Inc., specifying supporting documentation for capital work orders, including project dates, utility function, forecast amounts, and depreciation class. Projects cancelled or deferred are reported in Quarterly Capital Reports.

Section 1003
n Criteria Summary Document • Deprecia on Class • Re rement Informa on Deleted: ¶ • Con ngency Informa on Project Descrip on, that clearly defines the intended scope of the project. Moved down [1]: Related Projects approved or having taken...

AI summary The text outlines project criteria, including depreciation, contingency information, and justification requirements. It emphasizes grouping related projects, defining project scope, and evaluating necessity, timing, and methodology. Affiliate involvement in projects is also addressed as part of the criteria.

Section 1004
ied out in the manner proposed (i.e. Why do this project this way?) • Whether the work will be undertaken by an affiliate and reason for affiliate involvement Summary of Related Capital Items • Related Projects approved or having taken place i...

AI summary The text outlines criteria for evaluating project proposals, focusing on rationale, affiliate involvement, and grouping related capital projects by asset type (e.g., turbines, hydro, wind, transmission). It also addresses rement categorization under accounting policies for capital assets.

Section 1005
OR 6350 - Assets Not Used or Useful), and the percentage of the asset pool it represents. Month DD, YYYY Page 27 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 492 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Pa...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power outlines criteria for capital expenditures, emphasizing contingency guidelines, cost support (supplier quotes, contracts), and cost-benefit analyses (engineering reports, business cases) to justify projects. The document details requirements for risk registers, prior experience, and technical reasoning.

Section 1006
to: • Engineering/condi on assessment reports • Independent consultant reports • Planning studies • Business cases Cost Benefit Analysis - This may include but is not limited to: • The Economic Analysis Model; including inputs, assump ons,...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines required documentation for capital expenditure justification, including cost-benefit analyses, technical studies, procurement records, performance data, and stakeholder engagement materials. The process emphasizes comprehensive due diligence and alignment with regulatory criteria.

Section 1007
n - This may include but is not limited to: • Government legisla on • Le ers of project support • Stakeholder engagement communica on 11.3 Capital Costs Incurred Prior to ApplicaƟon NS Power strives to submit all capital applica ons to the...

AI summary NS Power must submit capital applications to the NSEB for approval. Costs incurred before submission may be excluded from rate base if projects are inactive or exceed $1M without timely filing. Preliminary engineering projects over $1M require NSEB approval within six months of exceeding the threshold.

Section 1008
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 42 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document Capital Projects in ATO PosiƟon If a previously approved capital project exceeds the allowable varia...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power outlines criteria for capital projects exceeding approved budgets, requiring ATO applications for variances over 5% or $250,000. Unapproved spending above $1M risks exclusion from rate base until Board approval. Projects not filed within six months face quarterly rate base reductions.

Section 1009
a variance of more than the greater of 5% or $250,000 must be submi ed as ATO applica ons, within 6 months, if NS Power intends to include costs in excess of Board approval in its regulated rate base. The repor ng included with the Quarter...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for submitting ATO applications when capital project costs exceed Board-approved amounts by more than 5% or $250,000. It specifies documentation needed for such applications, including updated approvals, cost support, and economic analyses. Scope changes requiring Board approval are also addressed, with combined submissions required if both cost thresholds and scope changes apply.

Section 1010
changed to a full asset replacement. (i.e. a Steam Turbine Refurbishment project intended to replace / refurbish individual turbine blades is changed to a full turbine replacement). Month DD, YYYY Page 31 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for scope changes in capital projects, defining scenarios where changes constitute a scope change (e.g., full turbine replacement vs. blade refurbishment) and specifying required documentation for the Board, including updated approval sheets and cost support.

Section 1011
Deleted: c • Cost support for the Scope Change request (if applicable); and Deleted: ATO • Updated economic analysis and / or produc on cos ng modelling results (if applicable). 12.3 RouƟne Capital ATO Rou ne capital ATOs are based on the...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for Routine Capital ATO submissions by Nova Scotia Power Inc., including variance thresholds for sub-roune budgets, NSEB approval processes, and documentation requirements. It references the 2026 ACE Plan and capital expenditure justification criteria.

Section 1012
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 45 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document 13.0 Final Cost ApplicaƟon (FIN) Requirements Individual capital item projects that have final costs...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for submitting Final Cost Applications (FIN) to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) when capital projects exceed +5%/$250,000 or -10%/$500,000 cost variances. Projects below $1 million are exempt from FIN requirements. Submissions must include updated approval sheets, revised project descriptions, and variance explanations.

Section 1013
ec ng the Final Cost of the project; • Line by line project account variances explana ons will be provided for those accounts with material variances; and • Project scope variances. All projects should be final costed within twelve months...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for capital asset retirement, including normal wear and tear and inadequacy. The document emphasizes final cost submissions within 12 months of project in-service dates, with exceptions requiring justification. Projects in ATO positions must comply with rate base rules, removing costs from rate base if not filed timely.

Section 1014
al deteriora on of physical plant caused by use over me and usually occurs because of the physical deteriora on of the asset. This type of re rement usually causes an asset to be scrapped. Inadequacy This usually occurs because of such ite...

AI summary The text outlines categories for asset retirement, including physical deterioration, inadequacy, obsolescence, regulatory requirements, and customer demands. It emphasizes that retired assets may be reusable elsewhere. The document also references Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure justification criteria.

Section 1015
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 47 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document Procedures When capital assets reach the end of their useful life and are no longer able to contribu...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines procedures for removing capital assets from rate base upon end-of-life, deferring gains/losses (except land) over remaining asset life, and recognizing land sale gains/losses immediately. Environmental expenditures on land disposals are evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Section 1016
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 48 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document 15.0 RouƟne Expenditures 15.1 Foreword NS Power’s Rou ne Program (the Program) is organized and mana...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its Routine Expenditures Program under the ACE Plan, detailing recurring capital spending for equipment replacement, productivity improvements, and system growth. The program requires NSEB approval annually, with justification based on historical data and project budgets. Expenditures below materiality thresholds are classified as operational costs.

Section 1017
ey are incurred, regardless of the volume purchased. ExcepƟons: Where smaller components are implicit within the scope of a capital project they will be capitalized as part of the overall project. Month DD, YYYY Page 36 of 54 Date: Decembe...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing the capitalization of IT infrastructure components and routine classification into four functional categories (Generation, Transmission, Distribution, General Plant) to ensure operational efficiency and system performance.

Section 1018
Transmission RouƟnes Transmission Substa on Replacements, Addi ons, Modifica ons Primary Equipment Spares Protec on Modifica on & Replacement Transmission Line Replacements, Addi ons, Modifica ons Month DD, YYYY Page 37 of 54 Date: Decembe...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, detailing routines for transmission and distribution upgrades, stakeholder evaluation processes, and Board approval mechanisms through the ACE Plan. Expenditures are tracked annually, with over-expenditure referenced to section 12.2.

Section 1019
g a given year through the ACE Plan process and in the Q4 capital reports provided to the Board. Month DD, YYYY Page 38 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 503 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Append...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines confidentiality requests for sensitive capital expenditure data in its 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D, seeking Board approval under Rule 12 while emphasizing transparency in public decisions. The document establishes criteria for justifying capital expenditures.

Section 1020
179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document 17.0 Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria 17.1 IntroducƟon - General ConsideraƟons The following considera ons are used to evaluate...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power outlines criteria for justifying capital expenditures, emphasizing evaluation of alternatives, technology suitability, cost-effectiveness, compliance with reliability standards, and minimizing operational costs. The approach prioritizes meeting industry performance norms and selecting the least-cost option that satisfies requirements.

Section 1024
regarding the efficacy of innova on technology in reducing upward pressure on revenue requirement. Month DD, YYYY Page 42 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 507 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Append...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for justifying innovative capital projects focused on reliability, environmental compliance, and customer experience. Projects must improve grid stability through proven technologies or testing, support environmental compliance, and enhance customer experience via innovative solutions.

Section 1025
a and learnings, or aid in the development of business cases where applicable, regarding the efficacy of innova on technology in complying with environmental or other policy. Customer Experience Innova on capital projects jus fied under cust...

AI summary The document outlines criteria for justifying capital expenditures by Nova Scotia Power Inc., emphasizing improvements in customer experience through proven technologies and compliance with health and safety laws. Projects must either enhance customer experience or provide data for business cases, while health and safety expenditures must adhere to legal standards and include decommissioning costs.

Section 1026
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 56 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document • Altera ons to a site or physical plant to render it secure against public intrusion in order to li...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing security measures (e.g., fencing, signage) to limit liability and compliance with health/safety standards. Projects may also consider discretionary asset management criteria alongside safety improvements, requiring judgment to align with primary investment drivers.

Section 1027
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 57 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document 17.4 Environment As an industrial enterprise, NS Power is obligated to act in a manner which is resp...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines environmental obligations requiring capital expenditures to meet regulatory, legal, and voluntary environmental standards. Justification criteria include compliance with permits, licenses, regulations, agreements, guidelines, and international standards impacting environmental performance.

Section 1028
erna onal standards developed for various industrial sectors and voluntary ac on that bind the owner/operator to carry out its business in a certain way so as to meet agreed environmental performance. These instruments may be more flexible...

AI summary NS Power's capital expenditure criteria require justification based on specific instruments, including land acquisition through fee simple titles, easements, or leases. This aligns with international environmental performance standards and trade agreements.

Section 1029
can acquire interests which are less than the fee simple interest in land, including rights- of-way or easements for power lines, or u lity corridors and leases or licences for the occupa on of land. Land and Rights owned by NS Power are m...

AI summary NS Power manages land and rights based on operational needs, acquiring land for capital projects and disposing of surplus land while adhering to environmental criteria. Surplus land is sold if compliant with regulations, otherwise retained or redeveloped. Hydro project land is typically retained for system safety.

Section 1030
of capital asset criteria and, depending upon requirements, the land will be retained or sold. Month DD, YYYY Page 46 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 511 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for retaining or releasing abandoned rights-of-way and justifies capital expenditures for hydro, wind, and biomass assets based on safety, legal compliance, economic benefits, reliability, and failure risk. Surplus rights-of-way may be released to property owners.

Section 1031
• When the probability of failure is high enough that: • Making the proposed capital investment reduces the costs compared to con nuing to repair the exis ng asset; • The es mated cost reduc on is of significant magnitude to meet NS Power’...

AI summary NS Power's capital expenditure criteria prioritize economic justification, requiring projects to demonstrate cost reductions compared to repairing existing assets and align with Nova Scotia's Renewable Energy Standards. Thermal asset replacement must balance financial criteria, customer benefits, and renewable energy alternatives.

Section 1032
anned inspec on/performance programs and industry standards. An economic analysis is carried out such that the least cost op on mee ng all the requirements and constraints specified shall be selected. Thermal produc on assets shall be purc...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for capital expenditures, emphasizing economic analysis to select the least-cost option meeting requirements. Assets are replaced if failure risks are high, and investments are justified by cost reductions, financial criteria, and optimized timing. Heat rate improvements and capacity increases are evaluated using system models, with labour impacts calculated annually.

Section 1034
Bulk Electric System is planned, designed, and operated in accordance with single con ngency criteria. NS Power System Design Criteria are applied for all other por ons of the interconnected system. NERC standards and NPCC criteria are con...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power's system design criteria for transmission and distribution systems, emphasizing compliance with evolving NERC and NPCC standards. It details conditions for upgrading, replacing, or modifying transmission plant to ensure safety, reliability, and cost efficiency, while aligning with capital expenditure justification criteria.

Section 1035
nts. Addi onal details pertaining to the condi ons for replacement are provided in the NS Power Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure Jus fica on Criteria Detailed Document. 17.10 DistribuƟon System NS Power's Distribu on System connects...

AI summary NS Power outlines criteria for its distribution system, including requirements to serve, pole strength compliance, voltage standards, and outage performance. The document also addresses pole retreatment principles and conditions, emphasizing infrastructure maintenance and safety standards.

Section 1036
tment The principles set out hereunder shall be used by NS Power in determining the methods used and the ming of retreatment of its transmission and distribu on wood poles. CondiƟons for Retreatment Wood poles originally treated with penta...

AI summary NS Power outlines conditions for retreatment of wood poles treated with specific preservatives and standards for revenue metering equipment, including requirements for Measurement Canada (MC) type approval and periodic verification. Retreatment criteria and capital expenditure justification are referenced in detailed planning documents.

Section 1037
llows selec ve sampling of standard induc on type meters both in verifica on and re-verifica on. Month DD, YYYY Page 51 of 54 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 516 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Append...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for replacing metering equipment and upgrading work support facilities. Replacements occur when meters fail standards or customer rate classes change. Facilities are modified to ensure safety, comply with laws, and maintain asset longevity.

Section 1038
ds to NS Power's personnel or to the general public; • To meet NS Power's obliga ons to third par es or to conform with the provision of applicable laws and regula ons there under; • To protect facility assets by maintaining them in a reas...

AI summary The text outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s obligations to maintain facilities, comply with regulations, and select the least-cost option for capital expenditures. It defines telecontrol and telecommunications infrastructure, referencing the 2026 ACE Plan and a capital expenditure justification document.

Section 1039
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 65 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Summary Document Telecontrol and telecommunica ons are essen al for the protec on and control of the Bulk Power Syste...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. justifies capital expenditures on telecontrol/telecommunications systems for Bulk Power System reliability, compliance with NPCC/NERC standards, and IT investments under technical, economic, and customer experience criteria. These technologies enable system protection, remote monitoring, and alignment with evolving customer needs.

Section 1040
Experience IT capital projects may be jus fied primarily under one of these sub-criteria or under a combina on of them all. These categories and their jus fica ons are expanded upon below. Technical Technical projects are driven by cri cal...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria, categorizing projects into technical, economic, and customer experience. Technical projects address asset risks, economic projects focus on cost efficiency, and customer experience projects aim to improve service interactions. Vehicle replacement processes are governed by lifecycle cost screening.

Section 1041
ta on and work vehicles. Vehicle Replacement Process The first step in the review of any vehicle for poten al replacement is that it meet the life cycle cos ng methodology ini al screening criteria. Vehicles proposed for replacement based...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) outlines its vehicle replacement process based on lifecycle cost methodology, mechanical inspections, and prioritization of economic benefits. The document is part of the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D, detailing capital planning and expenditure justification criteria.

Section 1042
Appendix D Page 68 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document TABLE OF CONTENTS

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, though no detailed content is visible beyond the title and table of contents.

Section 1043
1.0 Defini ons ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 Introduc on .......................................................................................

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power's commitment to capital planning, including expenditure justification categories, economic analysis, and financing processes. It references the ACE Plan Projects, highlighting integration of affordability and clean energy initiatives within regulatory frameworks.

Section 1044
.......................... 25 6.9 Capital Budge ng................................................................................................. 25 6.10 ACE Plan Projects ....................................................................

AI summary The document outlines capital budgeting processes, ACE Plan projects, financial criteria for capital planning, economic analysis of alternatives, and requirements for NSEB approval, focusing on capital application procedures and authorization to overspend policies.

Section 1045
tal Item ATO.................................................................................. 49 12.2 Individual Capital Item Scope Change .................................................................. 49 12.3 Rou ne Capital ATO ........

AI summary The text outlines a document structure covering capital expenditure management, cost application requirements, asset remittance, routine expenditures, and justification criteria. It emphasizes regulatory processes for financial compliance, capital item scope changes, and confidentiality protocols within a regulatory proceeding context.

Section 1046
.......................................................... 58 Month DD, 2025 Page 2 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 521 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 69 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Powe...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria, focusing on processes for evaluating and approving capital expenditures. It is part of the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D, though specific details are redacted.

Section 1047
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 69 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria as part of the 2026 ACE Plan, detailing processes for evaluating and approving capital investments.

Section 1049
al Projects within the NS Power Rou ne Program .......................................... 89 Appendix B: Capital Item Documenta on Policy & Review Requirements .................................. 95 Appendix C: System Design Criteria .........

AI summary The document outlines definitions and criteria for Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure processes, including the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, Authorization to Overspend (ATO), and related terms. It details requirements for submitting capital projects to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB).

Section 1050
ital project that is approved and ini ated in one calendar year, but the investment of capital carries over into the subsequent year(s). Capital Cost: The cost required to complete a capital project. Capital Cost Allowance: A yearly deduc...

AI summary The text defines key terms related to capital expenditures, including Capital Cost, Capital Cost Allowance, and the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). It distinguishes between essential and discretionary capital projects, emphasizing economic rationale and risk implications for NS Power.

Section 1051
nical scenarios, and therefore “doing nothing” results in li le or no risk to NS Power’s system. Month DD, 2025 Page 4 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 523 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Append...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s approach to capital planning and expenditure justification, including the Economic Analysis Model (EAM) for evaluating projects based on economic, environmental, and regulatory criteria.

Section 1052
legal, safety, regulatory or environmental direc ves. ExecuƟve: A member of the NS Power Execu ve Team including General Managers, Vice Presidents, Execu ve Vice Presidents and the President and CEO. Final Cost (FIN): A capital work order...

AI summary The text defines key terms related to capital projects, financial metrics, and regulatory processes, including 'Final Cost (FIN)', 'Integrated Resource Plan (IRP)', and 'Internal Rate of Return (IRR)'. It outlines NS Power's Executive Team and the NSEB's role in reviewing capital projects.

Section 1053
agers who offer exper se and experience from different func onal areas within NS Power. The IRT Month DD, 2025 Page 5 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 524 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing integrated management of capital projects. The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) oversees electric utilities under the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act. Key terms include 'Planned and Advanced (P&A)' projects and the 'PowerPlan' software used for capital project management.

Section 1054
cts including project scope, jus fica on, budget, approvals and actual project informa on. The so ware can be used to research informa on on past projects and forecast project ac vity into the future. ProducƟon CosƟng Model: A system model...

AI summary The text defines key terms related to project management, capital expenditures, and system stability in energy operations. Concepts include routine capital items, safety projects, scope definitions, and the Special Protection System (SPS), which maintains system stability through load adjustments. A Production Costing Model is also described for forecasting energy costs.

Section 1055
ty, acceptable voltages or power flows. Automa c under-frequency load shedding as defined in the Month DD, 2025 Page 6 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 525 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Append...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria, defining Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) as upfront and lifecycle costs of capital assets. Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U) projects are those requiring immediate approval outside prior ACE Plans due to unplanned needs, distinct from planned projects (P&A).

Section 1056
t year, are not U&Us despite not being referenced in prior ACE Plans (these are designated as P&A projects). A U&U is submi ed because the capital item cannot wait un l the next ACE Plan for approval. Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC...

AI summary Defines U&U (Unforeseen and Unbudgeted) items and explains WACC (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) calculation by NS Power's Finance Team for use in EAM (Economic Analysis Model) to assess capital projects.

Section 1057
te of Return IRT Investment Review Team MC Measurement Canada Month DD, 2025 Page 7 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 526 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 74 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Powe...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, referencing the Nova Scotia Energy Board's 1995 ACE Plan Decision. It includes definitions of acronyms related to capital expenditures, reliability standards, and regulatory frameworks.

Section 1058
of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 2.0 IntroducƟon In its 1995 ACE Plan Decision, the Board provided the following: By an Order dated January 5, 1995 the Board directe...

AI summary The 1995 ACE Plan Decision directed Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) to file evidence for its Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by January 12, 1995, with a hearing commencing March 6, 1995. The Board established criteria for capital expenditures, requiring NS Power to present annual ACE Plans and ensure work orders under $1 million meet technical and financial justification standards, subject to periodic audits.

Section 1059
ers to ensure that such criteria had been sa sfied.1 Those technical and financial jus fica on criteria are contained in this document, the Capital Expenditure Jus fica on Criteria (CEJC). NS Power is a public u lity, subject to the provis...

AI summary NS Power, a public utility under the Public Utilities Act, operates under the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). The Board's approval threshold for capital projects increased to $1M for large-scale utilities. Projects under this limit require no Board approval, but the Board may audit and exclude imprudent expenditures from the rate base.

Section 1060
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 76 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 3.0 AdministraƟon This document will be maintained by NS Power. Pursuant to the Board’s 2016 ACE Pl...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its commitment to managing capital expenditures via the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC), aligned with the Board’s 2016 ACE Plan Decision. The document emphasizes stakeholder review, Board filings, and adherence to economic, financial, and regulatory standards for capital project approvals.

Section 1061
apital expenditures; • Effec vely responding to changing environmental, opera onal, technical, safety and financial condi ons in compliance with legisla ve and regulatory requirements; and • Providing complete and mely capital filings for B...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines objectives for its Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC), emphasizing consistent economic and technical standards to ensure capital projects benefit customers while minimizing rate impacts. The CEJC aims to enforce accountability, multidisciplinary oversight, and standardized practices in capital planning.

Section 1062
ancial and technical standards. • To support the use of consistent prac ces within NS Power. Month DD, 2025 Page 12 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 531 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its capital planning process, overseen by the Investment Review Team (IRT), which coordinates across departments to compile project lists for the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. The process involves collaboration between generation, transmission, distribution, and corporate groups, with initial steps beginning annually in each functional area.

Section 1063
istribu on, and Informa on Technology (IT), the process begins at the start of each year with the func onal groups compiling informa on about projects that require considera on for the following year. As this informa on is gathered, each f...

AI summary NS Power compiles project information annually into PowerPlan, a capital management system, with projects ranked using criteria like health and safety, environmental compliance, and system reliability. Projects are evaluated based on metrics such as SAIDI, SAIFI, and CAIDI, alongside regulatory and economic factors.

Section 1064
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 80 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Technically jus fied IT projects are broadly ranked usi...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. evaluates IT projects using criteria including customer impact, financial implications, compliance with regulations (e.g., NERC/CIP), and operational sustainability. Capital programs prioritize health/safety, regulatory compliance, service delivery, and risk mitigation, with economic initiatives assessed via performance metrics (SAIDI, SAIFI, CAIDI). Constraints include resource availability, maintenance cycles, and cash flow. Executive approval involves reviewing the ACE Plan.

Section 1065
Execu ve approval process involves a detailed review of the consolidated ACE Plan. Division management work with the execu ve team to address any comments or concerns which may arise from this review. Following this review and approval, fi...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's capital planning process, including executive approval of the ACE Plan, project revisions, and ranking criteria for Generation, Transmission, Distribution, and IT projects. Projects not ready for NSEB submission are deferred to later in the year.

Section 1066
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 81 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document for the capital project are further defined. All rankings are reviewed by a centralized Investment...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria, emphasizing a centralized Investment Review Team's role in evaluating project rankings for the 2026 ACE Plan. Projects are color-coded (red, orange, yellow, green) to indicate priority and risk, with criticality rankings influenced by factors like health/safety and environmental considerations.

Section 1067
s represent projects that carry a higher risk than the projects in the green rankings. While the colours provide a visual illustra on of risk, the ranking numbers are the focus of the ranking process. A lower ranking suggests a lower level...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power's approach to capital expenditure justification, emphasizing risk-based project rankings and asset management. Lower-ranked projects may still be prioritized if asset conditions deteriorate, with decisions guided by NS Power staff and third-party experts.

Section 1068
Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document ASSET MANAGEMENT CRITICALITY & CONDITION RISK ALIGNMENT MATRIX Criticality (Based on Consequence) CRITICALTY VALUE RISK MATRIX Health & Safety Environment Business Susta...

AI summary The document outlines criteria for justifying capital expenditures, emphasizing asset management risks related to health, safety, environment, and business sustainability. A risk matrix aligns criticality based on consequences like regulatory breaches, safety incidents, and environmental impacts, with criticality values assigned to different risk levels.

Section 1074
per year and 1 in 10 operating years. Failure or occurrence is almost certain (91-100% ). Available data, past Almost Certain 5 experience and or subject matter expert input indicates an expected occurrence rate of greater than once per ye...

AI summary The text discusses reliability risk assessments with high probability (91-100%) of failure events occurring annually. It references the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D and Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria document, focusing on infrastructure reliability and capital expenditure processes.

Section 1075
ova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Month DD, 2025 Page 17 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 536 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan App...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing technical justifications or economic benefits for General Plant projects (excluding IT, which uses a matrix). The document details processes for capital projects and accounting policies.

Section 1076
ital projects follow disciplined capital planning, budge ng and execu on processes. Figure 1.0: Summary of NS Power Capital Planning, Financing & Budge ng 6.4 AccounƟng Policies and Procedures NS Power’s Accoun ng Policies and Procedures a...

AI summary NS Power's accounting policies and procedures require Board approval, with revisions submitted to the NSEB. The company uses USGAAP for external financial reporting and follows capital expenditure justification criteria. The document outlines guidelines for classifying expenditures as capital or operating expenses.

Section 1077
ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document The following Accoun ng Policies and Procedures guide and direct NS Power’s capital expenditure program: • Rate Base (1520) • Materiality (1560)...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines detailed accounting policies and procedures for capital expenditures, emphasizing centralized planning to maximize customer benefits. Key policies include rate base, materiality, depreciation, and capitalization guidelines, with the Corporate Accounting Department overseeing interpretations.

Section 1078
efit to customers while allowing NS Power to meet its objec ves. The capital planning cycle for any given year typically begins early in the preceding year and concludes at the filing of the ACE Plan. Although the oversight and management...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) outlines its capital planning process, emphasizing centralized oversight and annual ranking of projects based on health and safety, regulatory compliance, customer reliability (SAIDI, SAIFI), requirement to serve, and economic factors (NPV, ACHI). Projects are reviewed to align with strategic goals and ensure justification.

Section 1079
I, CAIDI • Requirement to Serve • Economics: Based on Revenue Requirement, Net Present Value of the Project, Levelized Cost Analysis, $/ Avoided Customer Hours of Interrup on (ACHI) Each year, the capital program includes those projects wh...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital expenditure justification categories, emphasizing projects essential for health, safety, regulatory compliance, and service delivery. Economic evaluation methods include revenue requirement analysis, net present value, and levelized cost analysis. Capital decisions are influenced by factors like resource availability, maintenance cycles, and cash flow constraints.

Section 1080
of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document • Health and Safety 6.7 Economic Analysis 6.7.1 Economic Analysis Model The Economic Analysis Model (EAM) is an electronic spreadshe...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. uses the Economic Analysis Model (EAM) to evaluate capital projects by comparing revenue requirements, avoided costs, and financial metrics like NPV and IRR. The model incorporates capital investment profiles, operating cash flows, and tax rates, with annual updates to reflect current economic parameters.

Section 1081
(IRR) and discounted payback period for each alterna ve Each year an updated version of the model is provided to users with current tax rates, deprecia on rates and WACC. With respect to avoided costs, avoided costs are calculated using pr...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) outlines methods for evaluating project economics using avoided costs, including capacity factors, maintenance, and replacement energy forecasts. Projects are deemed economic if avoided costs exceed capital costs, with a payback period defined as when benefits equal avoided costs. Inflation is used as an escalator for year six onward, and NS Power will compare inflation estimates to fuel forecasts for ongoing validation.

Section 1082
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 89 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure justification criteria as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, focusing on detailed processes for evaluating and approving capital investments.

Section 1083
Deleted: 6.7.2 Revenue Requirement DirecƟve in The benefits of the model are that it is rela vely simple to use, promotes consistency of Annual Capital Expenditure Plan¶ capital analysis across the organiza on and provides immediate inform...

AI summary The document discusses the Revenue Requirement Directive in the context of the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, emphasizing a model's simplicity and consistency in capital analysis. It references the Board's 2011 ACE Plan decision, requiring NSPI to assess the ACE Plan's impact on revenue requirements, with adjustments beginning in 2012 and 2017 under the 2016 ACE Plan Terms of Consensus.

Section 1084
pursuant to the 2016 ACE Plan Terms of Consensus, NS Power also provides a version of the overall revenue With respect to various alterna ves considered within an EAM, project developers will requirement table based on stakeholder assump o...

AI summary NS Power's revenue requirement table, based on stakeholder assumptions and EAM, includes administrative overhead. Capital expenditures equaling depreciation do not affect rate base or revenue requirement, as rate base remains stable when capital spending matches depreciation. Developers must clarify alternative cost structures in EAM.

Section 1085
imal effect on rate base or associated revenue requirement and therefore it is examine further those projects where elimina on of the AO credit from the revenue excluded from the calcula on.¶ requirement analysis could affect the recommended...

AI summary The document discusses the impact of removing the Administrative Overhead (AO) credit from revenue requirement analysis on economically justified projects, emphasizing NS Power's need to assess effects on rate base, revenue requirement, and project recommendations. It also references the Production Costing Model for fleet dispatch forecasts.

Section 1086
expenditures in excess of deprecia on expense of all A system modelling tool used by NS Power to provide detailed forecasts of fleet dispatch assets in each year.¶ and produc on cos ng which reflect the increasing complexity of the system....

AI summary NS Power employs a levelized cost methodology to justify capital investments, incorporating factors like depreciation, interest, taxes, and rate of return. The approach calculates present value based on annual revenue requirements and evaluates project costs over their economic life, typically expressed in $/MWh.

Section 1087
por on of equity to total capital of the incremental rate used by NS Power calculates the present value based upon the annual revenue base.¶ requirement for the project throughout the term. The levelized cost analysis is useful Addi onal f...

AI summary The document discusses Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis. It references the Board's 2022 ACE Plan decision, which provided directives on evaluating capital projects based on revenue requirements and cost recovery mechanisms.

Section 1088
.4 Total Cost of Ownership Deleted: 5 In the Board’s 2022 ACE Plan decision, the Board provided the following direc ve: [T]he Board directs NS Power to use a TCO for IT projects over $1 million when an EAM is not provided, whether or not a...

AI summary The Board's 2022 ACE Plan decision mandates NS Power to use Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for IT projects over $1 million when an Economic Analysis Model (EAM) is unavailable. TCO encompasses capital and operating costs over an asset's useful life, aiding value-for-money comparisons. The TCO timeframe must align with the IT asset's expected useful life.

Section 1089
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 91 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 6.8 Capital Financing Capital financing is a centralized func on of NS Power, which deals with the...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s approach to capital financing and budgeting, emphasizing financial parameters like weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and capital cost allowance (CCA), and the importance of capital budgeting in corporate planning to assess future scenarios and allocate resources.

Section 1090
ing process because it is at this stage that NS Power assesses future scenarios and commits the financial and physical resources needed to achieve its objec ves. The process consists of the following: 1. Consolida ng the es mated cost for...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) outlines its Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan process, which involves consolidating project costs, developing the ACE Plan, and re-evaluating projects post-approval. The ACE Plan must align with the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) and is approved by NS Power’s Executive Team and the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). Projects must answer three questions to justify inclusion.

Section 1091
bjec ves. All ACE Plan projects must answer the following ques ons in order to be considered jus fied: 1. Why do this project? 2. Why do this project now? 3. Why do this project this way? A capital expenditure is not jus fied un l the need...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for justifying capital expenditures, requiring projects to answer three questions: purpose, timing, and methodology. Capital is categorized into Generation, Transmission, and Distribution, with specific definitions for each utility function.

Section 1092
nditures for the replacement of and addi ons to equipment for delivering electrical energy from points on the transmission system to customers served at voltages below 69 kV. General Plant: Includes expenditures for computer so ware, compu...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s categorization of capital expenditures into Essential (required by law, safety, or environmental mandates) and Discretionary (non-essential projects). It emphasizes that Essential projects include compliance with regulations, safety initiatives, and environmental efforts, while Discretionary projects are not legally mandated. The text references the 2026 ACE Plan and the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria.

Section 1093
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 94 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 2. Emergency Projects that usually arise as a result of an unforeseen event. These projects must be...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. categorizes capital expenditures into emergency, technical, and discretionary projects. Emergency and technical projects are mandatory for system reliability, while discretionary projects are economically driven with a 'do nothing' alternative. Discretionary projects may reduce revenue requirements but are not essential for safety or reliability.

Section 1094
Not proceeding with such a project, and therefore foregoing increased heat rate efficiency, does not impact the safe and reliable opera on of NS Power’s system. Generally with discre onary investments, NS Power seeks projects that provide re...

AI summary NS Power outlines its approach to capital expenditures, emphasizing discretionary investments that minimize revenue requirements and align with financial or strategic objectives. Essential capital projects are prioritized, while discretionary projects require approval based on economic evaluations. The document is part of the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D.

Section 1095
limi ng spending on discre onary capital projects. 6.11.2 DocumentaƟon Internal NS Power documenta on is prepared and retained for every capital project. Refer to Appendix B. Month DD, 2025 Page 29 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 548 o...

AI summary NS Power is responsible for developing financial criteria for capital projects, with centralized management and accountability for project documentation. Policies must be approved by the NSEB and the Board through proceedings like the Annual Capital Expenditure Plan.

Section 1096
, or can be incorporated within a proceeding, such as the Annual Capital Expenditure Plan. Month DD, 2025 Page 30 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 549 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its capital financing through debt and equity, emphasizing the use of weighted average cost of capital (WACC) to calculate Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC). WACC is approved by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), and capital projects must consider factors like cost of capital, depreciation, inflation, taxes, and investment risk in economic analysis.

Section 1097
ale for each factor and the basis for its use in determining the economics of capital projects is presented below. 8.1.1 Cost of Capital NS Power finances capital expenditures through: • Debt • Preferred shares • Common shares • Retained e...

AI summary The text outlines NS Power's financing methods for capital expenditures, including debt, preferred shares, common shares, and retained earnings. It explains that each financing source has associated costs and risks, and that the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) represents the minimum return required to compensate investors. The NSEB-approved capital structure range is used as a basis for cost calculations.

Section 1098
NS Power Capitaliza on Structure The mid-point of capital structure ranges approved by the NSEB is used as the basis for calcula on of Cost of Capital. Long Term Debt Structure The debt structure is based on the target structure accepted b...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's capital structure, including long-term debt and equity components, and explains the calculation of the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) based on the NSEB-approved mid-point range. It emphasizes the annual revision of WACC, its use in AFUDC rate approvals, and integration into the ACE Plan's economic models.

Section 1099
calcula on as part of the AFUDC rate approval request. Economic Analysis Models for projects included in the ACE Plan will also incorporate NS Power’s proposed WACC. 8.1.2 DepreciaƟon When NS Power acquires financing for its capital progra...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s approach to depreciation calculations for capital expenditures, including life span and mass property methods. It references the 2026 ACE Plan and AFUDC rate approval, emphasizing the use of Iowa Curves for mass property depreciation.

Section 1101
nalyses Income tax is included in the economic analysis of capital projects. Month DD, 2025 Page 33 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 552 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 100 of 17...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s approach to capital expenditure justification, emphasizing the inclusion of income tax in economic analyses. It distinguishes between tax depreciation (capital cost allowance) and rate-making depreciation, noting that the latter is used for revenue requirement calculations while the former affects taxable income.

Section 1102
in the calcula on of taxable income or cash flows. It is recognized in the calcula on of revenue requirement. Capital Cost Allowance CCA is deprecia on for tax purposes. CCA is a deduc on against taxable income. Capital Cost Allowance is b...

AI summary The text explains Capital Cost Allowance (CCA) as a tax depreciation method distinct from plant depreciation. It emphasizes NS Power's need to secure investment capital by maintaining investor confidence and ensuring financial soundness of capital projects through rigorous analysis.

Section 1103
sa sfy NS Power that, in addi on to being economic, it is a financially sound investment. Month DD, 2025 Page 34 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 553 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D P...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital planning priorities, emphasizing essential projects over discretionary ones. It discusses investment risk, noting that uncertainty increases with project duration and inherent risks tied to project-specific unknowns.

Section 1104
roject investment risk: Inherent Risk: varies with the nature of the project and generally relates to unknowns about successful performance. TradiƟonal Risk: results from errors in es mates and assump ons that affect the probable revenue re...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's approach to managing investment risks in capital projects, including inherent, traditional, and corporate strategic risks. It discusses establishing project-level cutoff rates to mitigate inherent risk and acknowledges corporate priorities may override project-specific risk assessments.

Section 1105
ACE Plan Appendix D Page 102 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 9.0 Economic Analysis of AlternaƟves 9.1 IntroducƟon The guiding principle of economic analysis is to s...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its approach to economic analysis of alternatives for capital expenditures, emphasizing cost-effectiveness and value for customers. The analysis includes evaluating traditional and non-traditional options, estimating revenue contributions, and using methods like net present value and sensitivity analysis to identify the least costly alternatives.

Section 1106
d generator capacity factors in the EAMs for a period of five years. NS Power uses an es mate of infla on as an escalator for years six (6) onward to determine future year avoided costs. On an annual basis, NS Power will compare its es mat...

AI summary NS Power uses inflation as an escalator for avoided costs beyond five years, with annual comparisons to fuel forecasts. Financial parameters like AFUDC, book depreciation, and cost of capital are critical for evaluating capital expenditures. Discrepancies between inflation estimates and fuel forecasts may trigger stakeholder discussions.

Section 1107
assessed on the asset. Cost of Capital: The weighted average cost of all capital employed by NS Power. Taxes: The taxes payable by NS Power on its earnings and the capital it employs to finance projects. Capital Cost Allowance: Deprecia on...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria, detailing cost components for economic analysis, including relevant costs, cost estimates, by-product receipts, and unequal lives. It emphasizes evaluating revenue requirements and capital project impacts.

Section 1108
The es mate of the costs and benefits of a capital project should show the difference in revenue requirement as a result of undertaking the project. 9.1.3.2 Cost EsƟmates Reliable es mates and forecasts are vital to the capital investment d...

AI summary The text outlines principles for estimating capital project costs and benefits, emphasizing accurate revenue requirement differences. Guidelines stress focusing on future post-tax revenues, differential costs, and opportunity costs to ensure realistic capital expenditure decisions.

Section 1109
be used more than one way, it has an opportunity cost. In general terms, an opportunity cost is the benefit lost by taking one ac on as opposed to another. It is the revenue requirement generated by an investment project that is of primary...

AI summary The text discusses economic analysis of capital expenditures, emphasizing revenue requirement and accurate payment estimation. It defines opportunity costs, distinguishes between internal and external payments, and outlines criteria for cost allocation in Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning process.

Section 1110
wn from stores or spares do create payments to an outside en ty when they are replaced and must be included in the es mate. 9.1.3.3 Receipts from the sale of by-products A by-product is any physical result of an alterna ve which is not a p...

AI summary The text discusses financial considerations for capital investments, including payments from replacing assets, credits from by-product sales, and methods for comparing projects with unequal lifespans (e.g., chain replacements or terminal values). By-product revenues reduce operating & maintenance costs in revenue requirement calculations.

Section 1111
When an ac ve market exists for a capital asset, such as an automobile, the poten al net receipts from sale of the asset must be used as the terminal value. 2. When no ac ve market exists for a retained asset, such as a distribu on line, t...

AI summary The document outlines methods for determining terminal values of capital assets, distinguishing between active market scenarios (using potential net sale receipts) and non-active market scenarios (using straight-line proration of replacement costs). It provides an example involving a distribution line with 33% remaining service life and $450,000 replacement cost, assigned a $150,000 terminal value. Terminal values are included in economic cost comparisons as receipts.

Section 1112
isons as receipts. 9.1.4 Analysis Period Depending on the nature of the capital investment, the analysis melines will vary. 9.1.4.1 The Planning Horizon - Economic Life The criterion to es mate the life of a project is the con nued ability...

AI summary The text outlines criteria for determining the economic life of capital investments, emphasizing the interplay between physical, technological, and product market lifespans. It defines economic life as the shortest of these periods or when cost differences between alternatives become negligible, highlighting the need for comprehensive analysis of project viability.

Section 1113
e market, its economic life has ended for the organiza on as soon as the manufacturer ceases to produce the product, market the product, or provide spares and services. Month DD, 2025 Page 40 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 559 of 782...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s approach to calculating Net Present Value (NPV) for capital expenditure decisions, emphasizing the time value of money, discounting future costs to the present, and using the cost of capital as the discount rate to ensure investment recovery and return. It highlights the importance of revenue requirements in investment decisions, independent of financing methods.

Section 1115
a minimum to a maximum) based on possible inaccuracies in forecasts and assump ons is evaluated. Those es mates that significantly change the comparison, when varied through this range Month DD, 2025 Page 41 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning process, emphasizing the evaluation of cost estimates for accuracy and the categorization of capital applications requiring NSEB approval, including unforeseen projects and revisions to the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

Section 1116
separate, or revised capital applica on). • Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U) capital projects. These projects are not included in the ACE Plan and are filed separately for Board approval. • Planned and Advanced (P&A) capital projects. These...

AI summary The document outlines categories of capital expenditure applications requiring Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) approval, including Unforeseen and Unbudgeted (U&U), Planned and Advanced (P&A), Authority to Overspend (ATO), Scope Change, and Final Cost (FIN) applications. Each type has specific filing requirements and thresholds for NSEB oversight under the Public Utilities Act.

Section 1117
to the provisions of the Public UƟliƟes Act (the Act). NS Power is subject to general supervisory oversight of the NSEB. Sec on 35 and Sec on 35AA (October 30, 2019) of the Act provide the following: 35 No public u lity shall proceed with...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory requirements under the Public Utilities Act for NS Power's capital projects. Section 35 mandates Board approval for projects over $250,000, while Section 35AA exempts large-scale utilities (annual revenue ≥ $100M) from this requirement for projects ≤ $1M. The Board may approve, adjust, or disallow projects, and NS Power retains discretion to defer or cancel approved projects based on reassessments.

Section 1118
n in accordance with engineering, business judgment and resource availability. Any projects cancelled or deferred are reported in the Quarterly Capital Reports. 11.2 Capital ApplicaƟon Requirements Suppor ng documenta on is provided with e...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure requirements, including project timelines, depreciation class, and contingency information. Projects must be grouped as packages if related to the same asset or initiative, with details reported in Quarterly Capital Reports.

Section 1119
When mul ple projects relate to the same asset, or ini a ve Jus fica on Criteria Including: they should be grouped as a package.¶ • Sub Criteria (when applicable) • Descrip on of why the project is being undertaken (i.e. Why do this projec...

AI summary The text outlines criteria for grouping related capital projects and evaluating their justification, including project necessity, timing, methodology, and affiliate involvement. It specifies parameters for identifying related projects based on asset, unit, or location.

Section 1120
the same Wind Farm site. Transmission & Distribu on – Work completed on the same asset class (Padmount transformers, Breakers, etc.) or in the same loca on (feeder, Transmission Line). General Plant – Work completed on the same asset (appl...

AI summary The document outlines criteria for categorizing capital expenditures, contingency guidelines, and cost support documentation for Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 ACE Plan. It emphasizes structured approaches to asset classification, risk assessment, and justification of capital projects.

Section 1121
tract terms & condi ons • Management’s best es mate based on previous experience or related projects Addi onal Informa on required to jus fy the project - This may include but is not limited to: • Engineering/condi on assessment reports •...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for justifying capital expenditures, requiring engineering reports, economic models, performance data, and technical details. The process emphasizes thorough documentation and analysis to ensure project viability and alignment with strategic goals.

Section 1122
rformance indicators Technical Details - This may include but is not limited to: • Substa on drawings • Line drawings • System Impact Studies • Genera on Interconnec on Agreement Stakeholder Informa on - This may include but is not limited...

AI summary The text outlines NS Power's approach to capital costs incurred before application submission to the NSEB, including rules for preliminary engineering projects and projects exceeding $1,000,000. Costs are subject to removal from rate base if not submitted timely, with specific timelines for approval.

Section 1123
meframe un l these costs are submi ed for approval to the NSEB. Capital Projects in ATO PosiƟon Month DD, 2025 Page 47 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 566 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Append...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria, requiring approval from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) for projects exceeding approved amounts. Unapproved capital spending above $1 million may be excluded from rate base until formal approval is obtained.

Section 1124
f 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 12.0 AuthorizaƟon to Overspend (ATO) Requirements 12.1 Individual Capital Item ATO Approval to Overspend (ATO) applica ons are intend...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines requirements for Authorization to Overspend (ATO) applications, which seek Board approval for expenditures exceeding approved amounts. Projects with cost variances over 5% or $250,000 must submit updated documentation, including revised project details, cost support, and economic analysis.

Section 1125
ect amount; • Cost support for the ATO request; and • Updated economic analysis and / or produc on cos ng modelling results (if applicable). 12.2 Individual Capital Item Scope Change Scope Change applica ons are intended to request Board a...

AI summary The document outlines procedures for handling scope changes in capital projects, requiring Board approval and combining applications if ATO/FIN thresholds are exceeded. It emphasizes cost support for ATO requests and updated economic analysis for capital expenditure justification.

Section 1126
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 116 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document • A technology project that intended to replace / upgrade a system with a specified applica on cha...

AI summary The document outlines criteria for justifying capital expenditures by Nova Scotia Power Inc., including definitions of scope changes, required documentation for scope change applications, and routine capital ATOs tied to the annual ACE Plan budget.

Section 1127
and / or produc on cos ng modelling results (if applicable). 12.3 RouƟne Capital ATO Rou ne capital ATOs are based on the annual budget of individual sub-rou nes noted in the preceding ACE Plan. Those sub-rou nes with variances compared to...

AI summary The document outlines requirements for Routine Capital ATOs based on annual budgets, submission thresholds for NSEB review, and documentation needed for sub-rou nes exceeding 5% or $250,000 variances. It also details Final Cost Application (FIN) requirements under the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 1128
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 117 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 13.0 Final Cost ApplicaƟon (FIN) Requirements Individual capital item projects that have final cos...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines requirements for Final Cost Applications (FIN) when capital projects exceed cost variance thresholds (+5%/$250,000 or -10%/$500,000). Submissions must include updated approvals, revised project descriptions, variance explanations, and scope changes. Projects below $1 million do not require a FIN.

Section 1129
lec ng the Final Cost of the project; • Line by line project account variance explana ons will be provided for those accounts with material variances; and • Project scope variances. All projects should be final costed within twelve months...

AI summary The document outlines requirements for final cost submissions within 12 months of a project's in-service date, exceptions for delays, and rate base rules for projects in ATO positions. It also discusses retirement of capital assets due to normal wear and tear or inadequacy.

Section 1130
al deteriora on of physical plant caused by use over me and usually occurs because of the physical deteriora on of the asset. This type of re rement usually causes an asset to be scrapped. Inadequacy This usually occurs because of such ite...

AI summary The text outlines reasons for asset retirement, including physical deterioration, inadequacy, obsolescence, regulatory requirements, and customer demands. It also references a detailed capital planning document under Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 1131
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 119 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Procedures When capital assets reach the end of their useful life and are no longer able to contri...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s procedures for removing capital assets from the rate base upon reaching the end of their useful life, including depreciation handling and exceptions for land sales. It references the 2026 ACE Plan and discusses routine expenditures, though later sections are redacted.

Section 1132
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 120 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 15.0 RouƟne Expenditures 15.1 Foreword NS Power’s Rou ne Program (the Program) is organized and ma...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its Routine Program for recurring annual capital expenditures, including replacements, improvements, and system growth additions. The program adheres to Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria and requires annual NSEB approval via the ACE Plan, with detailed budgeting and historical data provided for justification.

Section 1133
y are incurred, regardless of the volume purchased. ExcepƟons: Where smaller components are implicit within the scope of a capital project they will be capitalized as part of the overall project. Month DD, 2025 Page 54 of 113 Date: Decembe...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing the capitalization of IT infrastructure components (e.g., servers, software, networks) to ensure operational efficiency. Routine classifications are grouped into generation, transmission, distribution, and general plant categories, reflecting standardized capital expenditure practices.

Section 1134
Transmission RouƟnes Transmission Substa on Replacements, Addi ons, Modifica ons Primary Equipment Spares Protec on Modifica on & Replacement Transmission Line Replacements, Addi ons, Modifica ons Month DD, 2025 Page 55 of 113 Date: Decemb...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its 2026 ACE Plan, detailing capital expenditure routines for transmission, distribution, and general plant upgrades. The plan requires Board approval annually, with stakeholders evaluating proposed routines. Expenditures are tracked individually, and over-expenditure is addressed in Section 12.2. Routine projects are reported quarterly to the Board.

Section 1135
of the individual rou ne projects included in NS Power Rou ne Program are provided in Appendix A. Month DD, 2025 Page 56 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 575 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appe...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines confidentiality requests for sensitive capital expenditure data under Rule 12 of the Board’s Rules, balancing transparency with protection of proprietary information. The document details capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing the Board’s role in ensuring transparent, non-confidential public decisions.

Section 1136
179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 17.0 Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria 17.1 IntroducƟon – General ConsideraƟons The following considera ons are used to evaluate...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing evaluation of alternatives, technology suitability, cost analysis, compliance with reliability standards, and selection of the least-cost option meeting requirements. The Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) is referenced as a framework for decision-making.

Section 1137
ensure compliance with NPCC and, or NERC Reliability Standards. The least cost op on mee ng the requirements and constraints specified above shall be selected. 17.1.1 Integrated Resource Plan An Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) assesses vari...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power's Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), emphasizing its role in assessing supply/demand scenarios, ensuring compliance with emission standards, and maintaining a 20% capacity reserve margin. The IRP serves as a strategic, stakeholder-informed roadmap for long-term electricity planning and capital expenditure justification.

Section 1140
es beyond the deployment and use of the capital assets by providing data and learnings, allowing for tes ng before deploying at scale, or aiding in the development of business cases, where applicable. For greater certainty, this category a...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for justifying capital expenditures on innovation projects, emphasizing customer value, reliability, compliance, and the use of innovative technologies or novel applications of existing ones. Projects must demonstrate potential benefits in reducing revenue requirements, enhancing grid stability, and providing data for future scaling.

Section 1141
data and learnings, or aid in the development of business cases where applicable. Sub-JusƟficaƟon Criteria Innova on capital projects may be jus fied under one or more of the following sub-criteria: • reduce upward pressure on revenue requ...

AI summary The text outlines sub-justification criteria for innovation capital projects, focusing on reducing revenue requirement pressure, enhancing grid reliability, and improving customer experience. It emphasizes deploying proven technologies to lower operational costs, manage renewable integration challenges, and address reliability risks from weather events and power quality issues.

Section 1142
crea ng reliability and grid stability challenges that are difficult to address with tradi onal grid Month DD, 2025 Page 61 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 580 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan App...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure criteria for addressing grid reliability challenges through innovative technologies like grid automation and energy storage. Projects must demonstrate potential to improve system stability or provide data for future deployment of new technologies.

Section 1144
s are driven by the reasonable expecta on they may lead to improvements to customer experience exclusive of other jus fica ons, but may also provide benefits under the other sub-criterion noted above. Innova on capital projects jus fied un...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing innovation-driven projects that enhance customer experience through proven technologies or data collection, and clarifies that health and safety can only be a primary justification for capital projects, not a sub-criterion when other justifications are used.

Section 1146
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 130 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 17.4 Environment As an industrial enterprise, NS Power...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its commitment to environmental sustainability and the necessity of capital expenditures to comply with environmental permits, licenses, and regulations. The document emphasizes that environmental performance requirements, driven by legislation and agreements, justify capital investments to meet regulatory standards.

Section 1147
apital expenditure criteria will include jus fica on based on the type of instrument placing the requirements. Environmental Agreement, Guidelines, InternaƟonal Standards and Voluntary AcƟon Criteria These criteria respond to agreements be...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure criteria influenced by environmental agreements, international standards, and voluntary actions. These criteria ensure compliance with performance expectations under trade agreements, with expenditures justified by specific instruments.

Section 1148
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 131 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document 17.5 Land and Right-Of-Way NS Power needs to occupy and access land to enable the Company’s opera...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for land acquisition and disposal as part of its capital planning process. Land is typically acquired for capital projects within the five-year budget or for future projects if economically viable alternatives are unavailable. Non-operational land is managed to protect adjacent uses or generate revenue.

Section 1149
the open market. In such instances the property may be acquired if no economically prac cal alterna ve property is available to sa sfy the requirements of the future project in ques on. Land Disposal NS Power can dispose of, lease or grant...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's policies for land and asset management, including disposal of surplus land, buildings, and rights-of-way, while emphasizing environmental compliance. It also addresses capital planning and expenditure justification criteria for hydro, wind, and biomass assets.

Section 1150
dro, Wind and Biomass The principles set out hereunder shall be used by NS Power in determining the methods used and ming of purchase and replacement of its hydro, wind and biomass produc on assets. These produc on assets shall be purchase...

AI summary NS Power outlines principles for managing hydro, wind, and biomass production assets, including replacement conditions to address safety, legal compliance, economic benefits, reliability, and optimized investment timing. Economic justification procedures prioritize cost-effective solutions meeting operational and financial criteria.

Section 1151
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 133 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document • Wood stave pipelines shall be replaced when an engin...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for capital expenditures, including replacing wood stave pipelines based on engineering risk assessments, turbine runners due to degradation or efficiency gains, and dams/hydraulic structures failing to meet safety standards. Decisions hinge on formal engineering evaluations and risk analyses.

Section 1152
ed na onal standards of stability and flood management capability for exis ng structures, or where accepted criteria of "due diligence" for public and environmental safety cannot be met. • Generator stators will be rewound when there is a...

AI summary NS Power outlines procedures for generator stator maintenance and thermal asset replacement, emphasizing insulation testing, economic justification for capital expenditures, and compliance with Nova Scotia's Renewable Electricity Standards. Decisions prioritize energy value over costs and align with renewable energy mandates.

Section 1153
at the least cost op on mee ng all the requirements and constraints specified shall be selected. Month DD, 2025 Page 67 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 586 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appen...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for capital expenditures, emphasizing cost reduction, system optimization, and economic analysis. Key factors include failure probability, heat rate improvements, capacity increases, labor impacts, and forced outage rate modeling using system dispatch and economic analysis models.

Section 1154
genera on, o en at a higher cost than the exis ng genera on. These costs are es mated using the probabilis c produc on model and incorporated into the Economic Analysis Model. 17.8 System Design Nova Sco a Power’s transmission system is di...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. estimates generation costs using a probabilistic production model integrated into the Economic Analysis Model. The transmission system is classified into primary, secondary, and electrically remote categories with distinct design criteria. NS Power adheres to NPCC Directory #1 for bulk power system design, ensuring alignment with interconnected grid standards.

Section 1156
nd 6 cycles second zone with permissive signal for both three-phase and line-to-ground faults. Back-up clearance mes are defined to be 12 to 16 cycles for both three-phase and line-to- ground faults. Secondary Transmission System includes...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria, defining technical parameters such as backup clearance times for faults, electrically remote transmission thresholds, and normal system conditions including load expectations, transmission facility status, and voltage stability ranges.

Section 1157
tal or regulatory restric ons. • Stable steady-state opera on of the Interconnected Transmission System. • All system voltages within 95% to 105% of nominal, unless otherwise noted. • All system elements opera ng within their con nuous the...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's criteria for upgrading and replacing transmission plant, emphasizing conditions such as eliminating hazards, meeting legal obligations, reducing operational costs, and maintaining reliability. It details purchase and replacement conditions under capital expenditure planning.

Section 1159
oils are tested every year. • Other insula ons are tested every four to six years. Month DD, 2025 Page 71 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 590 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 138...

AI summary The document outlines testing intervals for equipment like SF6 and oil interrupters, battery inspections, and NPCC protection tests. It details NS Power's procedure for evaluating transmission plant replacement, emphasizing economic justification to select the least-cost option meeting requirements.

Section 1160
ther transmission plant so as to eliminate NS Power’s requirement for the plant in ques on. • Replace the transmission plant as to maintain NS Power’s transmission system. • Any repairs, upgrades or modifica ons will be costed as per the m...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power's approach to transmission and distribution system upgrades, emphasizing cost justification for capital expenditures and adherence to service provision requirements. It details criteria for replacing transmission infrastructure, cost calculation standards, and the integration of distribution systems with customer service needs.

Section 1162
immediately if, in the opinion of NS Power, it cons tutes a hazard to opera ng personnel or the general public. Otherwise, it shall be replaced in a least cost manner. Month DD, 2025 Page 73 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 592 of 782 R...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for capital planning and expenditure justification, emphasizing least-cost replacements when hazards are absent and adherence to CSA voltage standards. Voltage deviations trigger evaluations of alternative solutions to meet standards economically.

Section 1164
lars, and represent the costs to resolve feeder/substa on voltage problems. Overloaded Equipment Month DD, 2025 Page 74 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 593 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appen...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for determining when transformers, cables, and conductors are considered overloaded, referencing specific load thresholds and standards manuals such as DEP 3.03 and the 'Underground Standards Manual' to guide capital expenditure planning and justification.

Section 1165
t feeders has been fully u lized. In addi on, cable ra ngs for normal and emergency condi ons should be determined by reference to the “Underground Standards Manual”. • Conductors Overhead conductors are considered to be overloaded when th...

AI summary The document outlines procedures for identifying and addressing overloaded equipment on Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s distribution system, referencing specific manuals and criteria for conductor loading, equipment ratings, and economic justification of solutions.

Section 1166
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 142 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document For overloading equipment problems the costs are iden fied such that the least cost op on mee ng a...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for addressing overloaded equipment and deteriorated conductor issues. Overloaded equipment solutions prioritize least-cost options, including replacement or system reconfiguration. Conductor replacement is justified by safety risks, outage levels, or economic factors, with failure to meet any criterion sufficient for replacement.

Section 1167
ny one of the criteria outlined below. The criteria that establish the basis for conductor replacement are as follows: • Powerline Technician Safety – Live Line Procedures When safety considera ons for live line procedures as per the NS Po...

AI summary The document outlines criteria for conductor replacement based on safety standards and tensile strength thresholds, as part of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 ACE Plan. It emphasizes safety considerations from the NS Power Safety Manual and CSA standards, linking conductor deterioration to capital expenditure justification.

Section 1168
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 143 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document • Lineworker Safety – General Linework When tests indicate that the torsional duc lity of individu...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for conductor replacement based on safety (torsional ductility testing), economic analysis (energy losses, maintenance costs), and physical deterioration (galvanizing coating loss). Replacements are justified when conductors fail technical standards or economic evaluations show cost-effectiveness over their remaining life.

Section 1169
er a significant por on of the circuit. Conductor replacement will be planned on the basis of predicted remaining life as established from experienced deteriora on rates. Note 1 – A database of conductor test results will be established. T...

AI summary The document outlines conductor replacement planning based on life expectancy analysis and environmental factors, and emphasizes annual outage data analysis to prioritize reliability improvements. It details Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital expenditure justification criteria for infrastructure upgrades.

Section 1170
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 144 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document The protec on of the distribu on plant and public and employee safety is provided in Distribu on E...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for capital expenditures to protect distribution systems, ensuring safety, service continuity, and economic justification. The process evaluates costs for solutions like protective devices, reconductoring, and system upgrades, emphasizing cost-effective measures to prevent transformer/capacitor failures.

Section 1171
rrent year or present worth dollars and represent the costs to resolve distribu on system protec on problems. PrevenƟon of Catastrophic Failure of DistribuƟon Transformers/Capacitors Maximum symmetrical fault levels of 8000 amps at 24.94 k...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital expenditure justification criteria, focusing on distribution system design standards to prevent catastrophic failures and grounding requirements. It specifies fault level thresholds and references the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D for detailed procedures.

Section 1172
6 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 145 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document • Grounding – Economic Jus fica on Procedure To reduce the earth poten al the costs are iden fied suc...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria for grounding, joint use agreements, highway relocation, radio interference voltage, and voltage unbalance. Costs include labor, materials, and compliance with regulations like DEP 5.50 and the Radio Communication Act. Joint use agreements with Bell Aliant aim to reduce costs for both parties.

Section 1173
r other similar methods. Voltage Unbalance Expenditures may be required due to viola on of the criteria outlined in DEP 5.50 "Distribu on Feeder Balancing" on NS Power's system. Alterna ve methods of solving this problem would include phas...

AI summary The text outlines capital expenditure requirements for addressing voltage unbalance, flicker from motor starting, and wood pole retreatment under NS Power's criteria. It references DEP guidelines for distribution feeder balancing and voltage flicker, emphasizes customer responsibility for flicker mitigation, and details conditions for wood pole retreatment using approved preservatives.

Section 1175
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 147 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Pole Retreatment - Economic JusƟficaƟon Procedure The...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines procedures for pole retreatment based on structural integrity studies and sets metering equipment standards requiring Measurement Canada (MC) Type Approval and periodic verification under S-E-02 specifications. The approach emphasizes cost-effective capital expenditures and compliance with regulatory metering requirements.

Section 1176
nd Re-verifica on of Electricity Meters", before being placed in service. Meters are also brought in from ac ve service on a periodic basis for re-verifica on according to this standard. • Meters being purchased at the present me for kWh m...

AI summary The document outlines meter verification standards, replacement conditions, and capital expenditure justification criteria for Nova Scotia Power Inc. It emphasizes economic considerations in selecting standard meters due to re-verification costs and discusses Measurement Canada's testing requirements for accuracy and compliance.

Section 1177
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 148 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document • When meters fail the criteria specified in the Standard, depending upon the economics (i.e. labo...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines procedures for meter replacement and repair based on economic evaluations, including directives from Measurement Canada and cost comparisons between repair and replacement options. Decisions depend on factors like labor/material costs, spare parts availability, and MC orders.

Section 1178
lity, the costs to repair the meter at a manufacturer's facility. Included in these costs are labour, material, expenses, overhead, shipping and any other relevant costs. • Meters which fail re-verifica on according to the document S-E-02,...

AI summary The text outlines cost considerations for repairing failed electricity meters, including labor, materials, and depreciation practices. It also describes NS Power's capital expenditure justification criteria for building facilities, emphasizing safety, asset protection, and cost-effective modifications.

Section 1179
& Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document • To eliminate condi ons which, in NS Power's opinion, cons tute hazards to NS Power's personnel or to the general public; • To meet NS Power's obliga ons to third par es or to c...

AI summary NS Power outlines criteria for capital expenditures, emphasizing hazard elimination, regulatory compliance, asset protection, and facility maintenance. Economic justification procedures evaluate building projects based on lifecycle costs, productivity impacts, and compliance with codes.

Section 1180
ojects will be cost jus fied over the life of the building and all costs taken into account (labour, material, expenses, administra ve overhead, interest and all other relevant costs). • Furniture and equipment will be replaced on an equiv...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for justifying capital expenditures, emphasizing comprehensive cost analysis over a building's lifecycle, including operational, construction, and safety-related expenses. Projects must consider factors like staffing impacts, environmental compliance, and long-term operational costs.

Section 1182
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 151 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document teleprotec on and special protec on systems (SPS). Tel...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines economic justification criteria for telecontrol and telecommunications systems, emphasizing compliance with NPCC and NERC standards. The process involves evaluating alternatives, technologies, and procurement methods to ensure cost-effective, reliable solutions for grid operations.

Section 1183
ng NS Power staff; rent or lease facili es and provide services using NS Power staff; rent or lease facili es and contract to others for services; and variants of the above as appropriate. Each alterna ve will be subject to full life cycle e...

AI summary NS Power evaluates alternatives for replacing facilities and services, prioritizing net present value (NPV), compliance with industry reliability standards (NPCC/NERC), and operational cost efficiency. Alternatives are ranked based on lifecycle economic analysis, including capital, lease, and operational costs.

Section 1184
o provide the lowest overall opera ng costs to NS Power. • Required to ensure compliance with NPCC and, or NERC Reliability Standards. 17.14 InformaƟon Technology ApplicaƟon and Hardware System Informa on Technology (IT) is subject to rapi...

AI summary NS Power's IT capital investments must comply with NPCC and NERC standards. Projects are justified under technical, economic, and customer experience criteria, with economic projects aiming for cost-effective operations. Procedures evaluate IT purchases, replacements, or upgrades.

Section 1185
ate the purchase, replacement or upgrade of Informa on Applica on and Hardware Systems at NS Power: Month DD, 2025 Page 86 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 605 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Ap...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for evaluating the repair, upgrade, or replacement of Information Application and Hardware Systems. Decisions are based on capacity, security, service level requirements, and economic analysis comparing repair, system upgrades, or replacement options to meet business needs.

Section 1186
eliminate NS Power's requirement for the plant in ques on. • Replace the Informa on Applica on and Hardware System as to maintain current business requirements. • Any repairs, upgrades or modifica ons will be costed as per the manufacturer...

AI summary The text outlines requirements for replacing NS Power's information application and hardware system, emphasizing total cost of ownership (TCO) analysis for repairs, upgrades, and new systems. It also classifies vehicles into transport and work categories, noting their roles in service delivery.

Section 1187
a on; transporta on and work vehicles. Transporta on vehicles are primarily used for transporta on of personnel. Vans, cars, sport u lity vehicles and trucks are considered transporta on vehicles. Month DD, 2025 Page 87 of 113 Date: Decemb...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its vehicle replacement process, emphasizing lifecycle costing, mechanical inspections, and the role of the Vehicle Standardization Committee in determining appropriate vehicle types. Fleet Services oversees expenditures and decisions related to maintenance and replacement.

Section 1188
b func ons change and new technologies evolve, a different vehicle may be specified. Vehicle expenditures and decisions on vehicle maintenance and replacement are the responsibility of Fleet Services. The Fleet Services group provides predi...

AI summary NS Power uses lifecycle costing to evaluate vehicle replacement decisions, with Fleet Services managing maintenance and replacements. The approach prioritizes economic efficiency based on predictive maintenance, age, and mileage. Capital expenditures for equipment replacements are categorized under routine programs, varying annually in scope.

Section 1189
t of equipment that are not large enough in scope and magnitude to be jus fied as individual capital projects. The value of the equipment replacement rou nes will vary from year to year. Upon iden fica on of failure or deteriora on in perf...

AI summary The text outlines maintenance routines for equipment replacement in hydro, thermal, and transmission systems, emphasizing immediate replacement of failed components and efficiency-driven projects. It details cost management for environmental risks, land acquisitions, and substation upgrades, with decisions based on condition assessments and cost-effectiveness.

Section 1190
of iden fied system problems following a review of op ons. The least Deleted: These are minor in nature. cost op on mee ng the requirements and constraints specified shall be selected. Month DD, 2025 Page 89 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D outlines capital expenditure routines for maintaining transmission infrastructure, including spare equipment management, protective relay replacements, and planned transmission line improvements. These procedures aim to ensure system reliability through proactive maintenance and upgrades.

Section 1191
opera on of the substa on. Transmission Line Replacements, Addi ons, Modifica ons This rou ne provides for the reac ve and planned replacement / improvement of transmission line components. Poles, structures and insulators which have deter...

AI summary The document outlines routines for transmission line replacements, distribution upgrades, and metering costs, emphasizing capital expenditure justification criteria. It references the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D and Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning processes, focusing on infrastructure maintenance and replacement priorities.

Section 1192
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 157 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Distribu on Upgrades and Replacement This rou ne covers the costs associated with reac ve distribu...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D outlines capital expenditure routines for distribution system upgrades, replacements, and new customer additions. Costs cover reactive/planned asset replacement, system performance improvements, storm damage recovery, regulatory compliance, and new customer infrastructure contributions governed by utility board regulations.

Section 1193
Deleted: an es mated number of new customers and on average per customer cost The vast majority of new customer connec ons result in a request for service. This ini al contact established the ming, cost and complexity of the addi on. Prima...

AI summary The text outlines processes for new customer connections, emphasizing NS Power's role in assessing service requests and associated costs. It details joint use funding components, including work prioritization with Bell Aliant, and references the 2026 ACE Plan's capital expenditure planning and justification criteria, including Right-of-Way Widening initiatives.

Section 1194
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 158 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Right-of-Way Widening This rou ne provides for costs associated with right-of-way widening for bot...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, covering right-of-way widening, work vehicles, tools/test equipment, and telecommunications. It details categories for capital expenditures, including fleet management, tool procurement, and network upgrades, with references to specific justification criteria for vehicles.

Section 1195
ce Network & Systems This includes PBX Cards, disk drives, power supplies, so ware & component upgrades, telephone sets, fax machines, and wiring due to office moves. Month DD, 2025 Page 92 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 611 of 782 REDA...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure justification criteria for telecom systems, including broadband networks, cable systems, voice networks, and network management systems, as part of the 2026 ACE Plan.

Section 1196
s: Includes network management servers and so ware, telecom alarm monitoring devices and site monitoring equipment. • Telecommunica ons Spares Includes: Maintenance Spares for telecommunica on equipment and facili es, broadband networks an...

AI summary The document outlines capital expenditure categories for telecommunications infrastructure, SCADA systems, and computing asset management at Nova Scotia Power Inc., including hardware, software, and network upgrades. It references the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D and detailed capital expenditure justification criteria.

Section 1197
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 160 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document This rou ne includes the purchase of hardware and so ware products required for the con nuing oper...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital expenditure plans for 2026, including IT infrastructure upgrades, property improvements (e.g., environmental compliance, building replacements), and furniture/equipment replacement. It references Appendix B's documentation policy for capital item reviews, though content is redacted.

Section 1198
9 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Appendix B: Capital Item DocumentaƟon Policy & Review Requirements ObjecƟve To specify the documenta on required to provide reasonable as...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines a policy requiring detailed documentation for all capital expenditures to ensure customer benefit, regulatory compliance, and accountability. The policy emphasizes evaluating alternatives, analyzing costs, and maintaining records for transparency and historical reference in capital project management.

Section 1199
port capital decisions, including development, jus fica on, cost analysis and spending. Month DD, 2025 Page 95 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 614 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Pag...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its capital planning process, requiring analysis of alternatives and documentation of infeasible options. A two-tier review process is mandated, with Level 1 involving project managers and departmental approvers evaluating projects against Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria.

Section 1200
ni al approval of the project. Approval is subject to the item mee ng the Capital Expenditure Jus fica on Criteria in place at the me the project is approved. Documenta on Requirements: Sufficient documenta on will be maintained to support t...

AI summary The document outlines requirements for approving capital projects under the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC), emphasizing documentation to ensure compliance with laws and customer benefit. Nova Scotia Power Inc. and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board are involved in final approvals and oversight.

Section 1201
ng that the item meets the technical and financial criteria contained in the Capital Expenditure Jus fica on Criteria at the me the project is approved. Documenta on Requirements: Sufficient documenta on will be maintained to provide reasona...

AI summary The document outlines requirements for capital expenditure justification, emphasizing documentation to ensure compliance with NS Power's financial and technical criteria. It details review levels for processes like ACE Plan approval and capital spending, with oversight by NS Power and the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board.

Section 1202
REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 164 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Records RetenƟon Period All capital files should be ma...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing a six-year retention period for capital files to comply with Taxa on Authori es requirements. Destruction before six years requires prior approval, with longer retention justified by legal, safety, or environmental considerations.

Section 1203
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 165 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document Exhibit A Note: The descrip ons provided are intended to be used as guidelines. The actual file co...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, detailing authorization levels, analysis of alternatives, and capital item detail requirements. It emphasizes structured approval processes, including divisional and corporate approvals, and evaluates spending against the ACE Plan and forecasts.

Section 1204
- Approved spending - Addi onal spending - Forecast - Final cost Online recommenda ons/approvals - Item recommenda on - Item approval - Item ac va on Descrip on - Scope - Project components/costs Month DD, 2025 Page 99 of 113 Date: Decembe...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Capital Planning and Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria, detailing account listings, justification processes, and references to legislation. It emphasizes structured project evaluation, including scope, project components, and criteria for approval.

Section 1205
- Why do the project? - Why now? - Why this way? - References - legisla on, regula ons Reason for over or under expenditure, final cos ng - Descrip on D) Economic Analysis Analysis output including: - Suppor ng documenta on for x x revenue...

AI summary The document outlines capital expenditure justification criteria for Nova Scotia Power Inc., emphasizing economic analysis, technical/financial criteria, and supporting documentation for revenue, costs, and project scope changes. It references the NSEB and other entities, focusing on expenditure reasoning and compliance with regulatory standards.

Section 1206
Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document DescripƟon Contents Level 1 2 Budget es mates x Other relevant informa on - (content will vary) x Examples include: - Regula ons, acts, cod...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing budget estimates, regulatory compliance, engineering studies, permits, and cost control processes. It includes supporting documents like outage reports, engineering assessments, and cost monitoring frameworks for capital planning.

Section 1207
heets and analysis Re rement Informa on x Tenders and bid evalua ons x Financial reports, including x - Power Plant Informa on- General ledger - Purchasing & Accounts Payable - Labour Distribu on - Documenta on to support assump ons, decis...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, including system design standards and a revision record for the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D. It emphasizes detailed financial reporting and project documentation requirements.

Section 1208
026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 169 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document REVISION RECORD Version Approver , Date Date Comments Number Signature 1995/01/12 0 Ini al document...

AI summary This document outlines the revision history of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Capital Planning and Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria, detailing updates to align with NERC/NPCC standards, fault clearing requirements, and the inclusion of policies like Looping Policy and Transient Voltage Criteria.

Section 1209
C. Milligan 10-Apr-24 Updated to include Transient Voltage 2024/02/20 6 Criteria per NERC TPL-001 Month DD, 2025 Page 103 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 622 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan App...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines criteria for capital expenditures on its transmission system, divided into four classifications. Criteria may be superseded by Northeast Power Coordinating Council (NPCC) standards. System studies must use existing protection system characteristics to ensure adequacy and investment requirements.

Section 1213
e the fault described in item (d), the fault contribu on clearing me will be 16 cycles. Breaker failure protecƟon will be applied to all Primary Transmission. The design criteria are: 1. From normal system condiƟons, the Interconnected Tra...

AI summary The document outlines breaker failure protection for Primary Transmission and specifies design criteria ensuring system stability post-faults. It references Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D and a detailed capital expenditure justification document.

Section 1214
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 173 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document No cascade tripping beyond elements cleared by the opera ve back-up protec on shall occur. 4. From...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines capital expenditure justification criteria for system reliability, including no cascade tripping, voltage ranges within 90-110% nominal, fault management ensuring minimum post-fault voltage sags above 70% nominal, and automated tap-changer corrections. These criteria aim to maintain grid stability and reliability under contingency conditions.

Section 1215
of nominal voltage for greater than 250ms during the 10s period following a fault. Month DD, 2025 Page 107 of 113 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 626 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 17...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines fault clearing time requirements for its Secondary Transmission System, specifying 6 cycles for local faults, 14 cycles for local breaker failure, and 16 cycles for remote breaker failure. The system must include redundancy and comply with industry standards.

Section 1216
ill be 14 cycles. c. Where breaker failure protec on is required to trip remote breakers to isolate the fault described in item a), the fault clearing me will be 16 cycles. d. For a three phase or phase to ground fault on any element direc...

AI summary The document outlines technical requirements for breaker failure protection, fault clearing times, and system stability criteria for the Interconnected Transmission System. It references the 2026 ACE Plan and Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing system reliability and dynamic response standards.

Section 1217
2026 ACE Plan Appendix D Page 175 of 179 Nova ScoƟa Power Inc. Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure JusƟficaƟon Criteria Detailed Document line-to-ground fault on any one system element cleared in prime me. No cascade tripping shall occu...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan Appendix D outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s capital planning and expenditure justification criteria, emphasizing system stability, fault clearance, and voltage management. Requirements include preventing cascade tripping, maintaining voltage within 90-110% of nominal, and ensuring load reduction within 10 minutes post-fault. These criteria aim to ensure grid reliability and compliance with operational standards.

Section 1218
on greater than 10% before movement of tap-changers. 6. As far as possible, provision should be made to ensure that no fault is le permanently on the system. 7. From normal system condiƟons, following a fault, the minimum post-fault posi v...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s Capital Planning & Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria outline technical requirements for electrically remote transmission systems, including fault level limits (≤1,000 MVA), post-fault voltage stability (>70% nominal voltage), and thermal limits (≤110% capacity) with operator intervention within 10 minutes.

Section 1219
shall be within 110% of their thermally limited ra ngs under the condi on that the System Operator can take ac on within a 10 minute period to reduce load on the element. 3. From normal system condiƟons, for any single conƟngency, steady-s...

AI summary The document outlines technical requirements for system reliability, including voltage limits (90-110% of nominal), fault management provisions, breaker backup for remote transmission, and transformer capacity standards to meet daily load demands under normal conditions and during generation outages.

Section 1221
ence to “C57.91-1995 IEEE Guide for Loading Mineral-Oil-Immersed Transformers”, it is NS Power prac ce to permit the loading of transformers to exceed the nominal or nameplate value. 3. For distribu on load serving transformers to exceed t...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines transformer loading practices, permitting up to 133% overload for distribution transformers under specific conditions, aligned with IEEE standards. System power transformers have seasonal loading limits (100% in summer, 110% in winter). The document references capital expenditure justification criteria and technical guidelines for transformer management.

Section 1222
where calcula ons are not specifically conducted: a. Under system normal, loading is limited to 100% of the 65°C manufacturer nameplate MVA for summer and 110% for winter; b. Under con ngency, the 15 minute short me ra ng is limited to 110...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. outlines its radial transmission policy, detailing loading limits for transmission lines under normal and contingency conditions. The policy emphasizes the importance of auxiliary equipment ratings and specifies scenarios for overload management to ensure grid reliability.

Section 1225
2026 ACE Plan Appendix E Page 2 of 17 Mersey Hydro Update Non-Confidential 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 3 4 2.0 SUST...

AI summary The document outlines the Mersey Hydro Update as part of the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix E, covering investment sustainability, project development, NPV analysis, and upcoming IRP considerations. Sections include redevelopment, decommissioning costs, and stakeholder engagement, though content is partially redacted.

Section 1227
1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 3 NS Power owns and operates the Mersey Hydro System (MHS), a series of six hydroelectric 4 stations and a lake storage diversion along a 21km reach of the Mersey River. The 2026 ACE Plan 5 focuses on sustaining capita...

AI summary NS Power is updating the 2026 ACE Plan to address sustaining investments for the Mersey Hydro System (MHS) while evaluating long-term options via the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). The Board directed NS Power to include NPV analyses comparing decommissioning, partial decommissioning, and redevelopment options, along with assumptions, in the ACE Plan application following the next depreciation study.

Section 1228
conducted since the filing of the 2025 ACE Plan related to evaluating 26 and costing the MHS decommissioning and partial decommissioning options. 27 28 10. The Board directs NS Power to include cost estimates for further preliminary 29 eng...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) directs Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) to include detailed cost estimates for Mersey system updates in its 2026 ACE Plan, including preliminary engineering, stakeholder engagement, environmental studies, and procurement costs. These estimates must also be incorporated into NS Power’s NPV analysis comparing the Mersey Redevelopment Project to decommissioning options.

Section 1229
2026 ACE Plan Appendix E Page 4 of 17 Mersey Hydro Update Non-Confidential 1 The sections below provide NS Power’s response, including: 2 3 • An update on the incremental sustaining investments that have been incorporated into the 4 Hydro...

AI summary NS Power outlines updates on Mersey Hydro redevelopment, including sustaining investments in the Hydro Interval Plan (HIP), stakeholder engagement with First Nations and government, an NPV analysis comparing redevelopment options, and cost estimates for preliminary engineering and procurement for 2028. The analysis includes assumptions and engagement details.

Section 1231
1 2.0 SUSTAINING INVESTMENT 2 3 The deferral of the Mersey Redevelopment is aligned with NS Power’s asset management 4 methodologies. Deferring projects when safety, environmental and economic risks, as well as 5 social implications associ...

AI summary NS Power defers Mersey Redevelopment due to safety, environmental, and economic risks, opting for sustaining investments to maintain MHS operations. The Hydro Investment Plan (HIP) dynamically updates capital forecasts, with sustaining investments increasing to $172.4 million (NPV $79.2M) by 2065, reflecting revised cost estimates aligned with recent projects.

Section 1232
eased from $68.1 million in Appendix G of the 2025 ACE Plan to 26 the current forecast of $79.2 million. NS Power continues to revise the profile of the investment 27 in accordance with its asset management principles to ensure projects ar...

AI summary NS Power is revising the investment profile in the 2026 ACE Plan, increasing the amount from $68.1 million to $79.2 million, aligning with asset management principles to schedule projects appropriately. The Mersey Hydro Update is part of the non-confidential information discussed.

Section 1234
1 2 The most recent update includes $45.1 million in sustaining investment between the years of 2026– 3 2030, compared to the prior year forecast of $40.6 million over the same period. Attachment 1 4 outlines the current MHS investment pro...

AI summary The document outlines a $45.1 million sustaining investment plan for 2026–2030, increasing from the prior year's $40.6 million. Key projects include turbine and generator refurbishments at Cowie Falls and Big Falls, as well as infrastructure upgrades at Lower Great Brook and Deep Brook, all categorized under 'Safe and Reliable' and 'Management of Water' initiatives.

Section 1242
lization. As with all capital projects, NS Power will continue 21 to evaluate and assess project alternatives based on the most current available information to ensure 22 that the selected project alternative remains the lowest cost option...

AI summary NS Power will evaluate capital project alternatives to ensure the selected option remains the lowest cost for customers, aligning with ongoing commitments to cost-effective infrastructure decisions.

Section 1244
1 4.0 NET PRESENT VALUE (NPV) ANALYSIS 2 3 As directed in the 2025 ACE Plan Order, NS Power has undertaken an NPV analysis of the capital 4 costs that compare redevelopment, partial decommissioning and full decommissioning 5 (renaturalizat...

AI summary NS Power conducted an NPV analysis of the Mersey Hydro System under three scenarios: full decommissioning ($196M), partial decommissioning ($346M), and redevelopment ($164M). Assumptions included historical production data, marginal cost models, and capacity reductions during redevelopment. The analysis reflects capital costs only.

Section 1245
in service during 2031-2050, reducing power production capacity during that 24 period 25 26 The NPV figures presented in this update reflect capital costs only and are not a full economic 27 analysis of the Mersey Redevelopment. They shoul...

AI summary The Mersey Redevelopment's NPV figures are based solely on capital costs and do not represent a full economic analysis. These figures should not be used in isolation to determine the project's overall viability.

Section 1247
1 future of the Mersey Hydro System (MHS). While the analysis includes simplified assumptions 2 for replacement energy and capacity costs, these do not represent a comprehensive system level 3 evaluation. A complete review combining decomm...

AI summary The text discusses the redevelopment costs of the Mersey Hydro System (MHS), noting that current estimates use simplified assumptions and require a comprehensive system-level evaluation. A detailed analysis combining decommissioning, redevelopment capital estimates, and system modeling will be conducted as part of the upcoming Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) process to ensure accurate cost comparisons.

Section 1248
that each phase will take 23 approximately five years to complete, where the first year will focus on preparation and 24 procurement. 25 26 The total combined estimate to redevelop the MHS is $1.2 billion CAD. 27 Page 11 of 17 Date: Decemb...

AI summary The Mersey Hydro Station redevelopment project is estimated at $1.2 billion CAD, with a five-year timeline starting with preparation and procurement in the first year. This update is part of the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix E.

Section 1250
1 4.2 Partial Decommissioning Costs 2 3 The MHS partial decommissioning cost estimate was based on detailed work completed in 2021, 4 leveraging the Big Falls rebuild scenario as a baseline due to significant overlap in scope. Under 5 this...

AI summary The text outlines partial decommissioning costs for the MHS at $512 million CAD, excluding new powerhouse construction and incorporating preparatory activities. It also details 2024 updates to the 2018 Hydro Asset Study by Boreas Heritage Consulting Inc. and Hatch Ltd., reflecting archaeological, environmental, and cost changes.

Section 1253
1 guidance from CCTH, as well as KMK. All Mersey assets were classified as having high 2 archaeological potential, which would trigger reconnaissance shovel testing, and excavation in a 3 decommissioning scenario. Dewatering events, partic...

AI summary The Mersey Hydro Station (MHS) decommissioning costs have increased to $507.8 million, combining archaeological assessments ($352.2M) and updated decommissioning models ($155.6M). Costs exclude NS Power internal expenses and unquantified socioeconomic impacts. Archaeological sensitivities and reservoir drawdown complexities further complicate decommissioning.

Section 1256
1 5.0 UPCOMING IRP CONSIDERATIONS 2 3 NS Power’s 2020 Integrated Resource Plan included a detailed evaluation of the MHS using both 4 the NS Power Decision Analysis (DA) Model and E3’s RESOLVE capacity expansion model. The 5 analysis compa...

AI summary NS Power's 2020 and Evergreen IRP analyses concluded that rebuilding Mersey Hydro Station (MHS) is more economical than decommissioning, citing its role in system reliability and decarbonization. However, NPV values alone omit full replacement costs, necessitating a comprehensive review. The 2025/2026 IRP will update MHS evaluation with refreshed load and emissions assumptions.

Section 1259
1 6.0 CONCLUSION 2 3 NS Power has increased the incremental sustaining investment in the MHS to maintain safe and 4 reliable operation of the system, while deferring a major investment for customers until the future 5 of the MHS is determi...

AI summary NS Power defers major redevelopment of Mersey Hydro Station (MHS) until the next Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to avoid long-term commitments, aligning with Nova Scotia’s Clean Power Plan and prioritizing affordability. Incremental investments maintain safe operations while conducting preliminary studies and stakeholder engagement.

Section 1260
s more information is obtained, and the HIP is 23 continuously updated as forecasts are revised as result. 24 25 NS Power reiterates that it is committed to ensuring the Mi’kmaw, stakeholders, and the Board are 26 actively engaged prior to...

AI summary NS Power emphasizes stakeholder engagement for the Mersey Redevelopment project, relying on the 2025 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) for decision-making. NPV figures exclude full system replacement costs, and a Capital Item (CI) application will be submitted post-IRP completion. Engagement with the Mi’kmaw and DFO is ongoing.

Section 1263
Scenario TOTAL or NPV 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 Partial Decommissioning Total Capital Investment $ 624,440,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 26,080,000 $ 32,590,000 $ 54,850,000 $ 48,1...

AI summary The text presents financial scenarios for partial and full decommissioning, redevelopment, and sustaining CAPEX through redevelopment, showing total capital investments and NPV (Net Present Value) figures from 2026 to 2038. All scenarios report negative NPVs, indicating projected financial losses.

Section 1264
391 $ 994,699 $ 887,769 $ 905,525 NPV (CAPEX) $ (79,222,501) Total Redevelopment and Sustaining $ 1,374,842,402 $ 9,673,500 $ 15,210,000 $ 9,609,750 $ 9,909,750 $ 9,200,000 $ 15,497,877 $ 41,726,783 $ 71,511,131 $ 60,515,523 $ 43,010,391 $...

AI summary The text presents financial data including NPV (Net Present Value) calculations for CAPEX, energy value, avoided capacity costs, and total benefits across multiple years. Assumptions include 2% inflation and 190,000 MWh average Mersey production (2015-2024). Key figures highlight redevelopment costs, energy value, and overall NPV outcomes.

Section 1265
190,000 2015-2024 average Mersey production (MWh) 2% Inflation rate (matches HIP) Marginal cost of elec $ 81.57 $ 84.15 $ 87.07 $ 105.19 $ 107.29 $ 109.44 $ 111.63 $ 113.86 $ 116.14 $ 118.46 $ 120.83 $ 123.25 $ 125.71 Marginal cost of capa...

AI summary The text presents marginal cost data for electricity and capacity from 2015-2024, showing increasing costs over time, and references a 5.08% WACC rate. It also mentions the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix E Attachment 1, indicating financial planning context.

Section 1267
Scenario TOTAL or NPV 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 Partial Decommissioning Total Capital Investment $ 624,440,000 $ 54,850,000 $ 48,140,000 $ 54,850,000 $ 48,140,000 $ 28,770,000 $ 15,550,000 NPV (CAPEX)...

AI summary The text presents financial scenarios for energy infrastructure projects in Nova Scotia, including partial and full decommissioning, redevelopment, and sustaining capital expenditures. It details total capital investments and net present values (NPV) for each scenario across multiple years, highlighting the financial implications of different investment strategies.

Section 1268
lopment and Sustaining $ 1,374,842,402 $ 74,753,635 $ 70,055,868 $ 51,970,950 $ 57,060,362 $ 76,662,597 $ 71,366,579 $ 55,851,568 $ 79,157,599 $ 69,972,186 $ 56,063,829 $ 79,219,406 $ 61,583,091 $ 5,187,596 NPV (CAPEX) $ (639,115,806) Tota...

AI summary The text presents financial data from a redevelopment project, including NPV for CAPEX, energy value, and avoided capacity costs. Assumptions include a 2% rate and marginal electricity costs. The overall NPV is negative, suggesting potential financial challenges.

Section 1269
Marginal cost of elec $ 128.23 $ 130.79 $ 133.41 $ 136.07 $ 138.80 $ 141.57 $ 144.40 $ 147.29 $ 150.24 $ 153.24 $ 156.31 $ 159.43 $ 162.62 Marginal cost of capacity $ 146.00 $ 149.00 $ 152.00 $ 155.00 $ 158.00 $ 161.00 $ 164.00 $ 167.00 $...

AI summary The document presents marginal cost data for electricity and capacity from 2025 to 2026, showing increasing trends. It references the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix E and includes a WACC rate of 5.08%. Portions of the text are redacted as confidential.

Section 1271
Scenario TOTAL or NPV 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 Partial Decommissioning Total Capital Investment $ 624,440,000 NPV (CAPEX) $ (346,011,445) Full Decommissioning Total Capital Investment $ 512,276,250 $...

AI summary The document presents financial scenarios for energy infrastructure projects, including partial and full decommissioning, redevelopment, and sustaining CAPEX through redevelopment, with detailed capital investment figures and NPV (Net Present Value) calculations spanning 2052–2064. Full decommissioning shows lower NPV than partial decommissioning, while redevelopment incurs the highest NPV.

Section 1274
2026 ACE Plan Appendix E Attachment 1 Page 4 of 4 NON-CONFIDENTIAL WACC Rate 5.08%

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Appendix E Attachment 1 specifies a Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) rate of 5.08%, reflecting the financial benchmark for capital project evaluations.

Section 1275
Scenario TOTAL or NPV 2065 Partial Decommissioning Total Capital Investment $ 624,440,000 NPV (CAPEX) $ (346,011,445) Full Decommissioning Total Capital Investment $ 512,276,250 NPV (CAPEX) $ (196,107,720) Redevelopment Total Capital Inves...

AI summary The text presents financial analyses of different scenarios (Partial Decommissioning, Full Decommissioning, Redevelopment, etc.), including total capital investments, NPV (CAPEX), energy value, avoided capacity costs, and total benefits. Assumptions include marginal costs of electricity and capacity, with NPV figures indicating net financial outcomes for each scenario.

Section 1291
2026 ACE Plan Appendix F Page 8 of 55 The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update Non-Confidential 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 3 In its 2023 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Order (M11017) on September 12, 2023, the 4 Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board...

AI summary The document outlines Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s compliance with the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board's (NSUARB) orders to update its 2030 obligations plan. It includes the 2030 Decarbonization Goals, the Province's Clean Power Plan, and the creation of the Independent Energy System Operator of Nova Scotia (IESO-NS). The updates are part of the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

Section 1321
- West Withdrawn Wind Farm 14 1 This is a change from the 2024 update as the EMT analysis for IR 597 was incorporated into the IR 675 15 plant model, which was modified to include both IR 597 and IR 675 as a single plant. 16 2 March 31, 20...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan incorporates EMT analysis for IR 597 into the IR 675 plant model, modifying it to combine both as a single plant. The first 54 MW of Mersey Wind 2 is scheduled for COD on March 31, 2027, reflecting updates to the 2024 IRP analysis.

Section 1328
2026 ACE Plan Appendix F Page 25 of 55 The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update Non-Confidential

AI summary This document is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically Appendix F of the 'Path to 2030 – 2025 Update' section. It outlines capital spending strategies and planning for Nova Scotia's energy sector as part of a multi-year initiative toward 2030 goals.

Section 1340
2026 ACE Plan Appendix F Page 30 of 55 The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The document is an appendix (Appendix F) of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, part of the 2025 Update titled 'The Path to 2030.' It is labeled as non-confidential and appears on page 30 of 55.

Section 1346
2026 ACE Plan Appendix F Page 32 of 55 The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The document is an appendix of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, part of the 'Path to 2030 – 2025 Update' non-confidential section. It outlines capital expenditure planning and long-term energy strategies for Nova Scotia, though specific details are not provided in the excerpt.

Section 1385
2026 ACE Plan Appendix F Page 48 of 55 The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update Non-Confidential

AI summary This document is an appendix from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, titled 'The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update,' and is marked as non-confidential. It outlines capital expenditure strategies as part of a long-term planning cycle.

Section 1388
2026 ACE Plan Appendix F Page 49 of 55 The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Appendix F, titled 'The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update,' outlines a non-confidential roadmap for capital investments and long-term planning in Nova Scotia's energy sector. It reflects strategic priorities and updates to the 2030 vision.

Section 1393
2026 ACE Plan Appendix F Page 51 of 55 The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Appendix F discusses the 2025 update to 'The Path to 2030' initiative, outlining non-confidential details related to Nova Scotia's energy and infrastructure planning.

Section 1396
2026 ACE Plan Appendix F Page 52 of 55 The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, part of the 'Path to 2030' initiative, updated in 2025. It focuses on capital investments and long-term energy strategies.

Section 1397
1 project delays. Talent shortages have the potential to affect NS Power, its partners 2 across the province, and its contractors and suppliers. 3 4 4. Project Approvals 5 • 2025 Trend: No Change 6 • The 2030 Clean Power Plan requires the...

AI summary The text highlights project delays due to talent shortages impacting NS Power and partners, the need for approvals under the 2030 Clean Power Plan, risks in transitioning to fast-acting generation by 2027-28, and the publication of the Clean Electricity Regulations (CER) aligning with Nova Scotia policy. Key issues include environmental and regulatory approvals, procurement challenges, and renewable energy targets.

Section 1399
2026 ACE Plan Appendix F Page 54 of 55 The Path to 2030 – 2025 Update Non-Confidential

AI summary This document is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically Appendix F of the 'Path to 2030 – 2025 Update' report. It outlines non-confidential information related to Nova Scotia's energy planning and capital investment strategies for 2030.

Section 1405
2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 2 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Appendix G outlines NS Power's Five-Year Reliability Plan update, focusing on infrastructure and system reliability measures.

Section 1409
2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 3 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan Appendix G outlines an update to NS Power's Five-Year Reliability Plan, focusing on capital expenditures and system reliability. The document is non-confidential and part of a broader regulatory proceeding related to Nova Scotia's energy infrastructure.

Section 1417
hase Extension Projects by Region .............................. 58 17 Figure 42: Illustration of Targeted NS Power Transmission Projects Planned for 2026 ............. 61 18 Figure 43: 2026 Substation Transformers Planned Replacement/Addi...

AI summary NS Power outlines its commitment to improving grid reliability and resiliency through a $1.3 billion five-year investment plan, with $206 million allocated for 2025. The plan aims to reduce outage duration and frequency while balancing affordability for customers.

Section 1419
2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 7 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan Appendix G outlines NS Power's Five-Year Reliability Plan, focusing on infrastructure and capital expenditures. The document is non-confidential and part of a regulatory proceeding related to energy reliability and planning.

Section 1422
2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 8 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Appendix G, focusing on the Five-Year Reliability Plan update. It highlights efforts to ensure grid reliability through infrastructure investments and operational strategies.

Section 1423
1 October 31, there is a 53 percent reduction in customer interruptions and a 29 percent reduction in 2 customer hours of interruption due to device failure in 2025 over 2023 levels. 3 4 The benefits of the program and the impact on the re...

AI summary NS Power outlines reliability improvements through targeted investments, citing a 53% reduction in customer interruptions by 2025. The Board directed NS Power to update its 2025 ACE Plan (M12012) with progress on its Five-Year Reliability Plan, emphasizing risk-based decision-making and grid-modernization upgrades. NS Power agrees with stakeholders on balancing reliability and affordability.

Section 1432
2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 14 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential

AI summary The document is an update to the NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan, part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It outlines reliability initiatives and capital investments for Nova Scotia's electricity system.

Section 1437
D REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 16 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential Reliability Targeted 2025 Planned 2025 Completed to 2025 Anticipated YE Result Program Progr...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's Five-Year Reliability Plan update, including targeted strategies, 2025 investment plans, completion dates, and program status. It focuses on reliability programs and capital expenditures for system reliability.

Section 1457
NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential 1 Figure 13: Map of 2025 Completed and Planned Establishment of New Rights-of-Way 2 3 4 4.5 Trimming and Removal of Trees Around Existing Power Lines 5 6 2025-2029 Forecast Inve...

AI summary NS Power's 2025 vegetation management efforts include aerial pruning, customer-requested trimming, and corridor maintenance, with $98M forecasted investment. 205 km of trimming completed, exceeding the 55 km year-end target to mitigate reliability risks.

Section 1461
ge 739 of 782 REDACTED REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 32 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential 1 Figure 18: 2025 Targeted Equipment Upgrades Progress Overview Program...

AI summary NS Power outlines its 2025 targeted equipment upgrades, including $81 million in distribution and transmission system investments. Key initiatives focus on replacing aging infrastructure, expanding protective devices, and ensuring environmental compliance to enhance system reliability and customer experience.

Section 1466
standards to align with the current CSA 21 C22.3 overhead line standards. In the Board’s decision on the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure 22 (ACE) Plan (M12012), the Board directed the following: Page 35 of 71 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 7...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board directed NS Power to monitor upgraded pole installations and evaluate their impact on system reliability, aligning with the 2025 ACE Plan (M12012). Appendix C details pole monitoring projects across regions, focusing on resilience improvements and outage reduction.

Section 1468
2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 37 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential 1 Figure 21: 2025 Build to Roadside Projects by Region YTD BTR Project BTR Project Status 2025 Planned Completed Comments Region BTR kms B...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan Appendix G details NS Power's 2025 Build to Roadside (BTR) project progress by region, showing planned vs. completed kilometers and project statuses (e.g., 'On Track – Ongoing' or 'Exceeded – Ongoing') for East, Northeast, Metro, and West regions.

Section 1472
Non-Confidential 1 Figure 24: Transmission System Program - 2025 Overview Category # Transmission Line Upgraded Replacements and Upgrades 29 Line Rebuilds 3 Asset Life Extension Province Wide Water Crossing Upgrades 3 Line Realignment 2 2...

AI summary NS Power outlines its 2025 Transmission System Program, including 29 replacements/upgrades, 3 line rebuilds, province-wide asset life extension, and 3 water crossing upgrades. These investments aim to strengthen transmission reliability through infrastructure management, as detailed in the 2025 ACE Plan and illustrated in Figure 25.

Section 1474
2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 42 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential 1 2 NS Power has purchased and received a spare substation transformer. Replenishing this spare unit 3 supports the overall NS Power Trans...

AI summary NS Power is updating its Five-Year Reliability Plan by acquiring spare transformers, advancing substation projects (Bayers Lake, Stellarton), and completing the Mount Uniacke substation. These actions aim to improve system reliability and capacity while managing inventory costs.

Section 1476
2026 ACE Plan Appendix G Page 44 of 71 NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan - Update Non-Confidential 1 Figure 27: 2025/2026 Advanced Grid Modernization Progress Overview Program Devices Remaining Devices On Track Complete Forecast 2025/202...

AI summary NS Power's 2025-2029 grid modernization plan includes $65M investment, with $21M allocated to Remote Terminal Units (RTUs). As of 2025, six of 11 RTUs are installed, with two more targeted for completion by year-end. The plan emphasizes real-time monitoring and outage response improvements through advanced grid technologies.

Section 1478
Complete West Kingston 63V Complete West Ohio Road 25W Complete West Central Argyle 19W On Track West Wolfville Ridge 83V Complete West Indian Path 80W On Track 7 8 6.1.2 Downline Connectivity 9 10 2025-2029 Forecast Investment: $44 millio...

AI summary The document outlines infrastructure projects with statuses (e.g., 'Complete', 'On Track'), a $44M 2025-2029 investment forecast, and a $5.2M 2025 investment. It references a cost reasonableness review (M12588) for NS Power's RTU Replacements Program and the 2026 ACE Plan Appendix G. The NS Power Five-Year Reliability Plan Update is also mentioned.

Section 1495
mming along approximately 192 kilometers of distribution line in 22 2026. Figure 38 provides a detailed breakdown of the communities and circuits where this work 23 is scheduled to take place 24 Page 55 of 71 Date: December 12, 2025 Page 7...

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's 2026 maintenance plans for 192 km of distribution lines across Central/Metro, East, Northeast, and West regions, with $83.9 million allocated for equipment upgrades under the 2026 ACE Plan. Storm hardening initiatives are forecasted to cost $178.9 million.

Section 1521
45 ft CL3 Quantity: 5 45 ft CL1 Quantity: 8 35 ft CL4 Quantity: 2 Cape 85S-401 Wreck Cove 40 ft CL4 Quantity: 5 50 ft CL2 Quantity: 1 Breton (41817 Cabot Trail) 35 ft CL4 Quantity: 1 45 ft CL1 Quantity: 2 45 ft CL3 Quantity: 3 40 ft CL1 Qu...

AI summary The document outlines the Capital Project Approval Process and the Project Delivery Model (PDM) Documentation Review, emphasizing the importance of proper completion and consideration of relevant PDM documentation during project planning and execution. It specifically mentions the Contingency Assessment as a key component to review if applicable.

Section 1522
DM documentation that is intended to inform project planning and execution. The following lists the relevant PDM documentation, and what should be reviewed: Contingency Assessment (if applicable) Review this document to ensure it’s aligned...

AI summary The text outlines documentation to be reviewed for project planning and execution, including Contingency Assessment, Estimate Maturity Matrix, Economic Analysis Model, Risk Register, and Post Project Review. These documents ensure alignment with guidelines, proper risk management, and accurate cost estimation.

Section 1525
(ii)Approved Budget (iii)Approved CI# Project Long Title (i)Approval Mechanism (iv)Actual Cost (v) (no Contingency) Contingency C0031069 L6020 Replacements and Upgrades ACE 2021 1,681,215 144,085 1,520,929 Under budget. FIN approved by NSE...

AI summary This table lists various capital work orders (CI) with their approved budgets, actual costs, and approval mechanisms. Some projects were under budget, while others exceeded their budgets by less than 5%. The approvals were handled by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), with some requiring additional filings.

Section 1526
y NSEB C0011339 L6549 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 2 ACE 2019 2,041,364 168,543 3,904,481 Over budget. ATO filed and approved by NSEB C0043010 2022-2023 Wood Pole Retreatment Program ACE 2022 1,300,037 98,320 791,054 Under budget. FIN f...

AI summary The text provides information on two capital expenditure projects: 'L6549 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 2' under ACE 2019, which was over budget with an ATO filed and approved by NSEB, and the '2022-2023 Wood Pole Retreatment Program' under ACE 2022, which was under budget with a FIN filed with NSEB.

N-2Proof of Advertisement 2 passages
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING p. pp. 0-1
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) has made an application to the Board for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (ACE) PLAN for 2026 which total...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power has applied for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, totaling $702.1 million, with a request for $284.0 million. A public hearing is scheduled for April 21, 2026, with options for participation including live listening, speaking, written comments, and intervenor status.

NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING p. p. 2
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) has made an application to the Board for approval of ap roximately $284.0 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (ACE) PLAN for 2026 which total...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) has applied for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for 2026, totaling approximately $702.1 million, with a request for $284.0 million. A public hearing will be held on April 21, 2026, with details on participation and submission of comments provided.

N-3NSPI (CA) RIR 1 to 32 - Redacted 30 passages
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests p. pp. 23-69
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests 1 Request IR-1: 2 3 With respect to Section 4.1, please provide the "further language" discussed on p. 27, lines 4 15-20. 5 6...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) includes a response from NSPI to a request for clarification on the definition of a scope change. NSPI suggests adding language to the current definition to clarify that changes in the alternative defended under the 'Why do this Project This Way' section would trigger a scope change filing.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. pp. 23-69
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-2: 2 3 With respect to Appendix D, p. 7 and p. 44, would a scope change be considered to have 4 occurred when a new asset is added to the project? For example, a project involving 5 refurbishment of a dam and...

AI summary The document discusses whether adding a new asset to a project, such as a dyke adjacent to a dam, would constitute a scope change. NS Power argues that such additions are part of the overall dam system and do not require amending the CEJC, though they may trigger an Authorization to Overspend (ATO) application.

Section 3 p. p. 23
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is under review by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of the proceeding M12619.

Section 5 p. p. 23
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate regarding the plan. This document is part of a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act.

Section 7 p. p. 23
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) is being analyzed in response to information requests from the Consumer Advocate. The plan outlines NSPI's capital spending proposals for the year 2026.

Section 13 p. p. 23
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) includes NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate. The document outlines NSPI's capital spending proposals and related justifications.

Section 15 p. p. 23
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is under review by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of proceeding M12619.

2 Below is the 2026 labour forecast for the remaining Distribution routines. p. p. 23
2 Below is the 2026 labour forecast for the remaining Distribution routines. 2026 Forecast ($) Routine Regular & Term Labour Overtime Labour D004 3,363,603 1,033,476 D006 497,226 243,216 D007 449,507 219,870 D008 308,951 1,558,675 D051 400...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 labour forecast for various distribution routines, detailing both regular/term labour and overtime labour costs for each routine, including amounts in Canadian dollars.

Section 27 p. p. 23
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is part of the NSEB proceeding M12619.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. pp. 23-69
NON-CONFIDENTIAL

AI summary The document is marked as non-confidential and provides context for a regulatory proceeding, referencing Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and the Public Utilities Act (PUA). It includes acronyms such as ATO, CEJC, and TGA, which relate to capital expenditures and regulatory oversight.

Risk Reviewers: p. p. 24
Risk Reviewers: Through the use of Emera's Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) Evaluation Scorecard, all identified risks are deemed to be mitigated through standard NSPI SWP's and procedures. Any risks identified through the TPRM Evaluatio...

AI summary NSPI aims to enter into a supply arrangement for the Tufts Cove TUC3 Precipitator Continuous Ash Hauling System with a service provider that is competitive in cost and quality, meets project timelines, and satisfies required specifications. Risks are managed through NSPI's standard procedures and the TPRM Evaluation Scorecard.

Recommendation: p. p. 24
Recommendation: The Evaluation Team recommends NSPI awards the Tufts Cove TUC3 Precipitator Continuous Ash Hauling System via Goods and Services Agreement and Purchase Order to:

AI summary The Evaluation Team recommends that NSPI award a contract for the Tufts Cove TUC3 Precipitator Continuous Ash Hauling System through a Goods and Services Agreement and Purchase Order.

Total CAD expenditure from this Recommendation: p. p. 24
Total CAD expenditure from this Recommendation: PO DETAILS DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NUMBER CURRENCY VALUE Tufts Cove TUC3 Precipitator Continuous Ash Hauling System CAD THIS RECOMMENDATION Capital or Operating? Capital Total Expenditure of this...

AI summary The document outlines a recommendation involving a capital expenditure for the Tufts Cove TUC3 Precipitator Continuous Ash Hauling System. It includes details about the type of expenditure and budgetary considerations, though specific figures are not provided.

REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-13 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 4 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 24-25
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-13 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 4 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) RFP-01/2025-403 - Tufts Cove TUC3 Precipitator Continuous Ash Hauling System Recommendation RFP-01/2025-403 April 2025 On January 7, 2025,...

AI summary A Request for Proposal (RFP) was issued on January 7, 2025, for the Tufts Cove TUC3 Precipitator Continuous Ash Hauling System. The RFP was evaluated based on key selection criteria including pricing, project efficiency, experience, and adherence to requirements, with the evaluation closing on January 28, 2025.

Technical and Commercial Evaluation: p. p. 25
Technical and Commercial Evaluation: Evaluation of all Proposals received based on the defined Key Selection Criteria: The Evaluation Scorecard is a compilation of all scores and associated comments completed by the Evaluation Team. The cr...

AI summary The document outlines the technical and commercial evaluation process for proposals, emphasizing the use of a weighted scorecard to assess and recommend the best proposal based on predefined key selection criteria.

Project Criteria: p. p. 25
Project Criteria: Criteria Points A - Evaluation A-1 - Pricing A-2 - Speed and efficiency of project plan, availability and delivery A-3 - Experience in the industry and relevant and specific expertise and competence of proposed project te...

AI summary The document outlines the evaluation criteria for a project, focusing on pricing, project delivery speed, team experience, solution innovation, adherence to requirements, insurance, safety performance, and regulatory compliance. This is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submission.

Recommendation: p. p. 26
Recommendation: The evaluation team confidently presents this Recommendation and believes the process was both competitive and transparent and requests your approval. 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses...

AI summary The evaluation team recommends approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, asserting that the process was competitive and transparent. The document references NSPI's responses to information requests by the Consumer Advocate.

CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) p. p. 26
CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) 1 Request IR-16: 2 3 With respect to projects C0070909, C0053234 and C0053214: 4 5 (a) Please explain why there is no cost support reference for the cost of the C0070909 and 6 C0053234 transformers in the Cap...

AI summary The document contains a request and response regarding cost support for transformers in specific projects (C0070909 and C0053234) under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. The response indicates that cost support details are provided in confidential attachments and that there is no change to the cost estimate. The transformers are still under construction, and contingency amounts may be affected by design changes.

REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-16 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 26
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-16 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Transformer Outline & BOM Transformer Outline & BOM Weeks ARO Nameplate Nameplate Weeks ARO Schematics Schematics Weeks ARO Diagram of Con...

AI summary This document outlines the details of transformer equipment delivery, including quantities, prices, shipping terms, warranty periods, and payment terms for a 2026 ACE Plan. It includes specifications for spare parts, transformer sub-total, oil filling, and assembly costs.

REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-16 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 26
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-16 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) DATA SHEET Standard Specification SE-38.1-2021 Power Transformers - Distribution Source, Sealed Tank, up to 138kV 96H-T1 Transformer Repla...

AI summary The document provides technical specifications for a 96H-T1 transformer replacement as part of the 2026 ACE Plan. It details parameters such as manufacturer, ratings, cooling methods, voltage, and compliance standards.

REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-16 Attachment 2 Page 3 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 26
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-16 Attachment 2 Page 3 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) 3.0 TRANSFORMER CONSTRUCTION 3.1 Type (i.e. sealed, conservator) Sealed Sealed Accuracy N/A 5.11 Winding Temperature Indicator (On X2 Bush...

AI summary The document contains a technical table detailing transformer construction specifications, including types, quantities, ratios, and accuracy levels for various transformer components. The information appears to be part of a larger 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submission.

REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-16 Attachment 2 Page 7 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 26
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan CA IR-16 Attachment 2 Page 7 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) SE-38.4-2010 Quantities & Prices (Schedule "C") Currency CAD Transformer Duty Freight and Offloading (FOB Destination) TRANFORMER SUB-TOTA...

AI summary The document outlines transformer replacement projects and their associated costs, including approved budgets, contingency amounts, and total spend figures. It references various projects with specific approval mechanisms and statuses, such as 'Partially Complete' or 'Under budget.' The ACE Plan is mentioned, along with the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) and the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619).

REDACTED p. p. 26
REDACTED 1 Request IR-17: 2 3 With respect to project C0070586: 4 5 (a) Please provide support and context for the assertions that "it is not always possible to 6 take an outage to L-6536" and that "Taking an outage to this line negatively...

AI summary The document includes a request for information regarding transmission line outages, switch capabilities, and contingency planning related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It seeks clarification on reliability risks, switch types, replacement timelines, and cost estimates for upgrades.

Section 93 p. p. 26
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) includes NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate. This document is part of a regulatory proceeding related to capital spending and customer advocacy.

2026 ACE Plan CA IR-17 Attachment 2 has been removed due to confidentiality p. p. 26
2026 ACE Plan CA IR-17 Attachment 2 has been removed due to confidentiality 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) has had its Attachment 2 removed due to confidentiality. This document contains NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate under NSEB Matter 12619.

21 p. p. 26
21 Breaker ID CI Number Project Title 43V-615 C0031051 2022 Pennsylvania Breaker 51V-552 C0057882 2024 Pennsylvania Breaker 51V-562 C0057882 2024 Pennsylvania Breaker 51V-601 C0057882 2024 Pennsylvania Breaker 51V-602 C0057882 2024 Pennsyl...

AI summary The document lists breaker projects with their respective IDs and CI numbers, including a 2022 and multiple 2024 Pennsylvania Breakers. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate.

Preamble p. p. 26
2 (b) Please refer to Confidential Attachment 1, page 5, line 16 and Confidential Attachment 2, 3 page 5, line 19 for details on the circuit breaker cost support and purchase agreement. 4 Please note, the prices in the attached are in USD....

AI summary The text references confidential attachments detailing the circuit breaker cost support and purchase agreement, noting that prices are in USD with an estimated exchange rate of 35%. It also mentions the 2025 ACE Plan (M12012) and NS Power's procurement policies for civil works related to breaker replacements.

CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) p. p. 26
CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) 1 Request IR-125: 2 3 C0050834 – Spare EHV Breaker Replacements 4 5 (a) Are both breakers being ordered from the same supplier? 6 7 (b) The project start date is noted as July 2024 and the first breaker is fo...

AI summary The text discusses a request (IR-125) regarding the procurement of spare EHV breakers by NS Power, including questions about supplier lead times, the RFP process, and cost details. The response indicates that both breakers are sourced from the same supplier, with lead times varying due to production slots assigned in different years.

CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) p. p. 26
CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) 1 which 19 were suppliers of circuit breakers. Using a robust evaluation approach, including 2 scorecard criteria selection and weighting, industry standard scoring methodology, and a 3 cross-functional commi...

AI summary NS Power and NB Power selected a vendor for circuit breakers in 2018 through a robust evaluation process. Due to market volatility and supply chain challenges, a new partnered program was proposed in 2024 to guarantee future capacity, with pricing evaluations and an escalation/de-escalation mechanism. The total cost of the breakers is $695,817 USD.

Section 107 p. p. 26
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) is being reviewed in the context of consumer advocate information requests, as part of the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) proceeding M12619.

N-4NSPI (DOE) RIR 1 to 7 5 passages
1 Request IR-1: p. p. 7
2026 ACE Plan NSDoE IR-1 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 1 1 Request IR-1: 6 significant water infiltration issues during execution, an extended construction timeline, 7 additional environmental permitting requirements, and additional archaeology a...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan discusses significant challenges in the Marshall Falls Dam Refurbishment project, including water infiltration, extended timelines, environmental permitting, and Mi'kmaq engagement. The project now requires fish and eel passage due to the 2019 Fisheries Act. NS Power will file Authorization to Overspend applications with detailed cost support.

2026 ACE NSDoE IR-001 Attachment 1 p. p. 7
2026 ACE NSDoE IR-001 Attachment 1 Status CI Number Title First Approval Year Original Approved Project Cost 2026 ACE Project Total Variance ($) Variance % Approved 29807 HYD - Tusket Falls Main Dam 2019 $ 18,157,609 $ 78,974,410 $ 60,816,...

AI summary The document presents a table of capital projects under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) plan, including project statuses, costs, and variances. It requests additional information on projects over $5M, specifically their primary purpose and whether they provide incremental energy or capacity.

Section 10 p. p. 7
acceptable lower-cost connection standard, phasing mechanism, or prioritization criteria that would lower the investment required and still meet the technical requirements. (f) As discussed in part (e), the least cost alternative is select...

AI summary The text discusses NS Power's approach to managing customer connection and upgrade costs, emphasizing the use of least-cost alternatives and regulatory oversight through the Authorization to Overspend (ATO) process. Regulations limit the scope of utility-funded investments, and ATO applications have been approved by the NSEB to justify increased spending.

2026 ACE NSDoE IR-003 Attachment 1 p. p. 7
2026 ACE NSDoE IR-003 Attachment 1 All Events Performance Standards Year Actuals ($Millions) Customer Additions CI CHI SAIFI SAIDI CI CHI SAIFI SAIDI 2016 68.9 4,070 1,721,114 5,988,996 3.42 11.90 1,237,756 2,545,202 2.46 5.06 2017 79.1 4,...

AI summary The table presents data on capital expenditure, customer additions, and performance standards from 2016 to 2025. It includes metrics such as Actuals, Customer Additions, CI, CHI, SAIFI, and SAIDI, providing a detailed overview of trends and performance over time.

\ \ Increase driven by CI 47124 - Advanced Metering Infrastructure project. p. p. 7
\ \ Increase driven by CI 47124 - Advanced Metering Infrastructure project. 1 Request IR-4: 2 3 Reference: Exhibit N-1: Application - Section 9.0 (General Plant) (PDF Page 57) 4 5 (a) General Plant capital for 2026 is forecast at $92.5 M,...

AI summary The text discusses an increase in General Plant capital for 2026, primarily driven by IT investments, deferred work from 2025, and vehicle replacements. NS Power explains the increase is due to resource constraints, shift to Software as a Service, and cybersecurity investments, among other factors.

N-5NSPI (IG) RIR 1 to 25 14 passages
1 (d) The overall coordination of the transition is being supported by the project management p. p. 40
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 (d) The overall coordination of the transition is being supported by the project management 22 (e) Please describe steps taken to coordinate work and avoid duplication of costs for 23 ratepayers between NSPI and IESO NS,...

AI summary The response discusses coordination between NS Power and IESO-NS during the transition, noting no duplication of costs in NS Power's capital planning process. It also references the 2026 ACE Plan and mentions the exclusion of external funding considerations in the 2027–2030 capital forecast.

Section 7 p. p. 40
- 1 Figure 9: Total Routine Capital Spending, page 33, at "Total Capital Items for which Approval is - 2 Sought": Similar to the total included in Figure 8, $256,305,380 (rounded to $256.3 million in - 3 Figure 8) refers to the 2026 foreca...

AI summary The text references Figure 9, which outlines total routine capital spending, specifically mentioning a forecast investment of $256.3 million for the 2026 ACE Plan and related capital work orders.

Date Filed: February 13, 2026 NSPI (IG) IR-4 Page 2 of 2 p. p. 40
Date Filed: February 13, 2026 NSPI (IG) IR-4 Page 2 of 2 1 Request IR-5: 2 3 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 14, Figure 1: NS Power Total Capital Investment: 4 Historical, Budget and Forecast. 5 6 Preamble: In the last two years, 2025...

AI summary NSPI explains the increase in capital spending budgets in 2025 and 2026, driven by initiatives to meet renewable energy targets and the Five-Year Reliability Plan. Key projects include the ECEI – Energy Storage and Synchronous Condenser projects, with significant investments planned over the next few years.

Section 9 p. p. 40
(b-c) When developing the capital program, specific rate impacts are not calculated. The capital program consists of all necessary investments that are required to maintain the safe and reliable operation of NS Power's generating facilitie...

AI summary The capital program includes necessary investments for maintaining and improving the reliability of NS Power's generating facilities, aligning with the Province's Clean Energy Plan. Rate impacts were included in a recent General Rate Application (M12451), with a 5-year plan considered appropriate to balance reliability improvements and rate impacts.

(e) Please refer to NSEB IR-2 for an updated Figure 1 that shows gross capital spending. p. p. 40
(e) Please refer to NSEB IR-2 for an updated Figure 1 that shows gross capital spending. 1 Request IR-6: 2 3 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 15, Figure 2: NS Power Total Capital Investment: 4 Historical, Budget and Forecast. 5 6 (a) Pl...

AI summary The text requests an updated version of Figure 2 from the 2026 ACE Plan, including total actuals for 2025, explanations for variances between forecasted and actual spending, and details on deferred or cancelled projects. It also asks for an explanation of how total capital spending exceeded the forecast despite project deferrals or cancellations.

Section 13 p. p. 40
10 Actuals. (b) The increased investment of $13 million in 2025 from the Q3 Forecast shown in the 2026 ACE Plan is primarily driven by an increased ECEI – Energy Storage investment due to materials originally scheduled not to be delivered...

AI summary The 2025 investment increased by $13 million due to earlier delivery of materials for the ECEI – Energy Storage project and additional work during the Point Aconi planned outage in November 2025. Attachment 1 provides an updated Deferred / Cancelled table reflecting the actual 2025 investment and forecast variance.

22 p. p. 40
22 1 (d) The 2025 actual investment exceeded the amount forecasted in the 2025 ACE Plan, despite C0068675 TRE6 Parallel Slide HP heater isolations 494,861 0 (494,861) Deferred 2026 C0068691 TRE6 - Boiler Main Stop Valve 148,839 0 (148,839)...

AI summary The text discusses the 2025 actual investment exceeding the forecasted amount in the 2025 ACE Plan, with several projects deferred or cancelled, including boiler valve refurbishments, fire protection upgrades, and electrical replacements, with some deferred to 2026 or 2027.

Section 24 p. p. 40
ering a scope change application. Based on NS Power's experience managing these projects, the likelihood of these quantities changing is very high and considers the estimate of 70-80 to be reasonable. (b) NS Power assessed this increase in...

AI summary NS Power argues that an increase in scope change applications would create a significant regulatory burden, requiring more resources and potentially delaying or reducing the quality of filings. They suggest that existing processes like FIN and ATO provide adequate oversight without unnecessary additional filings.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 40
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 2 (c) Yes, NS Power did consider mitigating approaches but found that any potential approaches 9 discussed. This updated language is not in the current proposed CEJC updates as it was not 10 canvassed with all intervenors...

AI summary NS Power acknowledges that updated CEJC criteria for 'scope' and 'scope change' differ from previous uses of the term, which historically included asset quantity. The updated definitions aim to reduce the number of scope change applications required, though they represent a departure from past practices.

15 p. p. 40
15 CI# Project Title Response C0021835 IT - CIS Replacement Resources were re-allocated to focus on priority restoration activities. Project deliverable progression delayed. C0047278 IT - Oracle MDM Upgrade Resources were re-allocated to f...

AI summary Due to a cyber event, IT capital investments for 2025 were reallocated to prioritize restoration efforts. This caused delays in project timelines but not in resource costs. NS Power will address any variances from the Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) plan when projects are filed for approval.

Section 33 p. p. 40
1 (c) Please reconcile the treatment of C0062624 IT - Mobile Field Connectivity 2 Enhancements in Figure 7 as a "2026 ACE Plan Subsequent Submittal" and as 3 "Carry-over Capital Spending" in Figure 32. 4 5 Response IR-12: 6 7 (a) Please re...

AI summary The text requests a reconciliation of the treatment of IT - Mobile Field Connectivity Enhancements in the 2026 ACE Plan Subsequent Submittal and as Carry-over Capital Spending. A response refers to a table for clarification.

3 p. p. 40
3 1 Request IR-13: 2 3 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 38, Figure 11: Historical Value of Projects Less than 4 $1M; and page 39, Figure 12: Historical Number of Projects Less Than $1M. 5 6 Preamble: Within 2026 there is a significant i...

AI summary The response to Request IR-13 explains that the increase in spending and number of projects under $1M in 2026 is due to smaller, more frequent capital investments on NS Power's steam assets as the company defers or avoids major investments, aiming to minimize costs as units approach retirement or conversion by 2030.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 40
NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-17: - Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 62, Figure 35 : Routine Capital Spending Project - Breakdown Yr/Yr; page 70, Figure 42: Summary of Forecasting Methodology for - Distribution Routines; and page 73, Figu...

AI summary The request seeks the 5-year historical dataset used to forecast D008 Provincial Storm spending for 2026, excluding 'Extreme Event Day storms,' and asks for the impact of these exclusions on the forecast. NSPI confirmed the use of a 5-year average excluding extreme events.

1 p. p. 40
1 1 Request IR-19: 2 solely on the difference between outage metrics before and after a project could lead to an 3 approach favouring the selection of projects on a reactive basis for only the worst 4 performing circuits to the detriment o...

AI summary The text discusses concerns about using outage metrics to evaluate project effectiveness, favoring reactive over proactive approaches. NS Power advocates for a risk-based approach incorporating both leading and lagging indicators. It also references the 2026 ACE Plan and requests clarification on how NSPI allocates storm-related costs and how reliability investments affect storm response costs.

N-6NSPI (NSEB) RIR 1 to 202 - Redacted 148 passages
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-1 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 3 p. p. 7
C0061403 2024/2025 Sacrifical Anode Installation 142,517 Equipment Upgrades Asset Life Extension Transmission

AI summary The document outlines a 2024/2025 project titled 'Sacrificial Anode Installation' with a cost of 142,517, categorized under 'Equipment Upgrades' and 'Asset Life Extension' in the 'Transmission' sector.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. pp. 7-72
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 2 3 (f) The trajectory of Figure 1 would only change in the numbers in the 5-year average, 2025 4 F as of Q3 and 2026B would increase. The projects brought forward that include federal 5 funding (Energy Storage, ECC - Wi...

AI summary The trajectory of Figure 1 would only change in the numbers of the 5-year average, 2025 F as of Q3 and 2026B, due to increased project costs from federally funded initiatives. All funding has been approved, ensuring no delays or failure to materialize.

2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests p. pp. 7-168
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests 1 Request IR-3: 2 3 General Inquiries and Follow-Up pages 7 to 30 4 5 In reference to Figure 2 – Total Annual Capital Expenditures by Func...

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlines reasons for changes in forecast spending across various functions. Generation spending is increasing due to Hydro Dam investments, transmission spending is decreasing as the Synchronous Condenser project nears completion, and general plant spending is rising due to infrastructure projects. Synchronous condensers and energy storage are classified under Transmission, though energy storage may be reclassified to Generation for cost-of-service purposes.

20 (c) The amount included under Generation Reliability related to the existing coal fired 21 generating facilities is as follows: p. p. 7
20 (c) The amount included under Generation Reliability related to the existing coal fired 21 generating facilities is as follows: Year Generation Reliability ($M) 2026 69.9 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Res...

AI summary The text provides information on the Generation Reliability amount for existing coal-fired generating facilities in 2026, which is listed as $69.9 million. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI responses to NSEB information requests.

Section 391 p. p. 7
2 (d) The Regulatory / Compliance forecast listed in the 2026 ACE Plan is reduced as it does 3 not include a number of future significant Hydro dam projects that moved to the Sustaining 4 Capital category, as while these investments do mee...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan's regulatory/compliance forecast has been reduced because it does not include future significant Hydro dam projects that have been moved to the Sustaining Capital category. These projects are intended to maintain the current asset in a safe and reliable manner, based on condition data.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-7 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 1 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 7
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-7 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 1 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) CI# Project # Project Long Title Invesment Trigger 29114-P031-026 P031 IT - NSPI Infrastructure Routine Lifecycle / Upgrade C0021835 IT - CIS Repl...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines various IT-related projects and investments for Nova Scotia Power Inc., including infrastructure upgrades, system replacements, and new implementations aimed at enhancing operational efficiency and cybersecurity.

12 Figure 1: 2025 Thermal Risk Profile p. pp. 7-41
12 Figure 1: 2025 Thermal Risk Profile 13 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary This section references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests, indicating ongoing regulatory engagement related to capital planning and information disclosure.

1 Figure 2: 2025 Hydro Risk Profile p. pp. 41-42
1 Figure 2: 2025 Hydro Risk Profile 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The text references a 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and responses by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) to information requests from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), with a mention of Figure 2, which outlines the 2025 Hydro Risk Profile.

1 Figure 3: 2025 Combustion Turbine Fleet Risk Profile p. p. 42
1 Figure 3: 2025 Combustion Turbine Fleet Risk Profile Location Engine Free Turbine Generator Balance of Plant Burnside Gas Turbine Unit 1 (BGT 1) Burnside Gas Turbine Unit 2 (BGT 2) Burnside Gas Turbine Unit 3 (BGT 3) Burnside Gas Turbine...

AI summary The document presents a 2025 Combustion Turbine Fleet Risk Profile, listing various gas turbine units and their locations. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) and NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. pp. 44-72
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 (b) The key elements that inform the 2018 study—including sustaining capital requirements, 2 decommissioning cost estimates, archaeological considerations, and other inputs that 3 underpin long‑term hydro system planning...

AI summary The 2018 study's key elements, including decommissioning cost estimates and archaeological considerations, have been updated and filed with the Board in the 2025 ACE Plan proceeding (M12012) and NS Power's 2026-2027 General Rate Application (M12451). Updated studies include the Hydro Asset Archaeological Costing Study (2024) and the Hydro System Decommissioning Cost Estimate (Hatch 2024).

WACC Rate 5.08% p. p. 50
WACC Rate 5.08% WACC Rate 5.08% System TOTAL or NPV 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 Annapolis Decommissioning Total Capital Investment $ 33,683,000 $ 2,780,000 $ 1,209,000 $ 18,069,...

AI summary The document presents a WACC rate of 5.08% and includes a table detailing capital investments and NPV across various systems and years, indicating long-term financial planning for decommissioning and sustaining projects in Nova Scotia.

WACC Rate 5.08% System TOTAL or NPV Annapolis Decommissioning p. p. 50
WACC Rate 5.08% System TOTAL or NPV Annapolis Decommissioning System TOTAL or NPV 2062 2063 2064 2065 Annapolis Decommissioning Total Capital Investment $ 33,683,000 NPV $ 28,848,416 Avon Sustaining Total Capital Investment $ 38,321,455 $...

AI summary The document presents a table with capital investment and NPV figures for various systems, including Annapolis Decommissioning, Avon, Bear River, Black River, and others, across multiple years from 2062 to 2065. The table outlines total capital investments and their corresponding NPVs for each system, highlighting financial data related to sustaining projects.

CI# Project Title Project Estimate ($) NSEB Approved Amount ($) Variance ($) p. p. 50
CI# Project Title Project Estimate ($) NSEB Approved Amount ($) Variance ($) C0008638 Cogswell HRM Redevelopment Program 8,001,748 6,617,148 1,384,600 C0068954 2025 PCB Downline Sampling and Replacement 2,286,083 1,716,718 569,365 52184 37...

AI summary The document presents a table of capital items with their project estimates, approved amounts by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), and variances. The table includes three projects with significant variances, and a note indicates that the most recent forecast for these projects is within a specified budget range.

Section 520 p. p. 72
\ As figures in the table are rounded , calculations may differ due to rounding. 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary This document references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests. It includes a note about rounding in the table and potential differences in calculations.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. pp. 11-154
NON-CONFIDENTIAL D005 2025 Actuals ($) 2026 Budget ($) Contractor Overhead 610,523 575,473 Vehicle Allocated Costs 1,713,865 1,278,630 Admin Overheads 1,963,834 2,177,285 Salvage (100,990) (81,646) Total 22,101,034 22,846,689 Capital Contr...

AI summary The table presents financial figures for 2025 actuals and 2026 budget projections, including contractor overhead, vehicle allocated costs, admin overheads, salvage, and capital contributions. The overall total for 2025 is $21,501,960, and for 2026, it is projected to be $22,418,590.

Section 522 p. p. 72
2 (d) The final 2025 investment for D005 was $21.5M, which was 1.2% over budget.

AI summary The final 2025 investment for D005 was reported at $21.5M, which exceeded the budget by 1.2%.

12 (c) Please refer to the table below. p. pp. 72-154
12 (c) Please refer to the table below. Cost Category 2026 Budget ($) Regular Labour and Term Labour 2,912,574 Overtime Labour 722,651 Materials 2,295,030 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Info...

AI summary The text references a table outlining the 2026 budget for various cost categories, including labour and materials, and mentions the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is associated with a specific regulatory matter (NSEB M12619) and NSPI's responses to information requests from the NSEB.

5 p. p. 72
5 Customer Connections Cost Category 2025 Total Regular Labour and Term Labour 3,427,133 Overtime Labour 922,344 Materials 4,501,098 Contracts/Consulting 4,272,155 Meals/Travel and Other 87,903 Royalty, Easement,Appraisal 41,735 Contractor...

AI summary The document presents a detailed breakdown of customer connection costs for 2025, including categories such as labour, materials, contracts, and overheads, with a total of $15,726,839 after accounting for capital contributions.

7 Please refer to the table below costs associated with load growth: p. p. 72
7 Please refer to the table below costs associated with load growth: Load Growth-Driven Cost Category 2025 Total Regular Labour and Term Labour 250,155 Overtime Labour 73,588 Materials 558,603 Contracts/Consulting 1,094,835 Meals/Travel an...

AI summary The text references a table outlining costs associated with load growth, including categories like labour, materials, and consulting. It also mentions the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and references a matter (NSEB M12619) related to NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests.

6 p. p. 72
6 Cost Category 2026 Budget ($) Regular Labour and Term Labour 3,363,603 Overtime Labour 1,033,476 Materials 6,139,585 Contracts/Consulting 6,621,457 Meals/Travel and Other 107,488 Royalty, Easement, Appraisal 46,603 Contractor Overhead 69...

AI summary The document presents a 2026 budget breakdown for various cost categories, including labour, materials, contracts, and overheads, with a total of $19,283,936 after accounting for capital contributions. It references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests.

- 7 consistent differences compared to another. Please refer to the table below: p. p. 72
- 7 consistent differences compared to another. Please refer to the table below: Year Region Km Widened Cost ($) 2022 Northeast 47 2,152,199 West 1 65,677 Total 49 2,217,877 2023 Northeast 76 3,445,540 West 1 32,839 Total 77 3,478,379 2024...

AI summary The document outlines the differences in capital expenditures across different regions and years, with data presented in a table. It references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests.

Section 546 p. p. 72
2 (c) While age and kilometers are a factor in determining the replacement timeframe for a 3 specific vehicle, the reason for vehicle replacement is based on overall asset condition and 4 likelihood of failure in the coming year. These veh...

AI summary The replacement timeframe for vehicles is determined by their age, kilometers, and overall asset condition. NS Power is working towards a replacement program aligned with the expected useful life of 8 years for work vehicles, supported by an increased budget in 2026.

9 (a) Please refer to the table below. p. p. 72
9 (a) Please refer to the table below. D004 2025 Cost Category Budget ($) Actuals ($) % Share Budget ($) Regular Labour and Term Labour 2,738,812 3,677,288 20% 3,363,603 Overtime Labour 600,615 995,932 6% 1,033,476 Materials 6,421,323 5,04...

AI summary The text presents budget and actual expenditure data for various cost categories under D004 and D061 for the years 2025 and 2026. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests.

Preamble p. pp. 11-154
5 (ii) Please refer to the table below. Note that the table denotes net change in kilometers 6 of distribution line on the system, not total distance added, as it is derived from a 7 snapshot in time from NS Power's GIS database. Also note...

AI summary The text refers to a table detailing the net change in kilometers of distribution line, derived from a snapshot in NS Power's GIS database. It notes that a cyber incident has temporarily affected NS Power's ability to update as-builts in the GIS database. The document is part of NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

11 (c) Please refer to the table below. Note that NS Power forecasts these projects on financials, 12 not on number of units. p. p. 72
11 (c) Please refer to the table below. Note that NS Power forecasts these projects on financials, 12 not on number of units. D061 Unit Rate per Customer 2025 Actuals ($) Regular Labour and Term Labour 1,169 Overtime Labour 279 Materials 1...

AI summary The text refers to a table showing NS Power's 2025 actual costs per customer and mentions that NS Power forecasts projects based on financials rather than the number of units. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI responses to NSEB information requests.

Section 567 p. p. 72
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It is part of a regulatory proceeding related to capital expenditures and planning.

Section 575 p. p. 72
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The document outlines NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is part of the regulatory proceeding under NSEB M12619.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-50 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 72
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-50 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted attachment from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). It contains confidential information and is part of an information request (IR-50).

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-50 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 72
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-50 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 7 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request (IR) 50. It contains confidential information and is not fully visible.

Programmer Notes: Ask all. Single Response p. p. 72
Programmer Notes: Ask all. Single Response - G2. Would you like to be entered into a draw for one of two $150 gift cards? - 1 Yes [ Please confirm your information: COLLECT NAME AND EMAIL] - 2 No [THANK AND TERMINATE] 2026 Annual Capital E...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) in response to information requests from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). It also includes a voluntary participant draw for gift cards.

15 Please refer to the table below. p. p. 72
15 Please refer to the table below. CI Cost Element Source Materials Purchase Agreement CI C0053214 – 76W-T1 Transformer Replacement Internal Contracts Expertise/Purchase Agreement Consulting External Expertise Materials Purchase Agreement...

AI summary The text references a table outlining cost elements and sources for transformer replacement projects, as well as the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB Information Requests.

11 Response IR-52: p. p. 72
11 Response IR-52: 12 - 13 The proportion of outage events, customer interruptions, and customer hours of interruption from - 14 all events coded as Defective Equipment and Tree Contacts by year are provided in the tables - 15 below. As di...

AI summary The response discusses outage events, customer interruptions, and customer hours of interruption categorized under Defective Equipment and Tree Contacts, referencing the 2026 ACE Plan Reliability Directive and the inclusion of some tree contact-caused outages in the Adverse Weather cause code.

21 2022: p. p. 72
21 2022: CEA Description Events CI CH % Events % CHI % CI Adverse Weather 9,471 1,001,627 21,439,047 35.6 32.4 53.9 Adverse Weather - Trees 3,788 400,651 8,575,619 14.2 13.0 21.6 Defective Equipment 3,391 413,904 1,896,129 12.7 13.4 4.8 Tr...

AI summary The text presents a table summarizing outage events and related metrics for different causes, including Adverse Weather, Defective Equipment, Tree Contacts, and Other Causes. It also mentions the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and responses by NSPI to NSEB Information Requests.

Section 638 p. p. 72
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) in response to information requests from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). It provides details on capital expenditures and related planning.

Section 640 p. p. 72
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and includes NSPI's responses to information requests from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB).

Section 644 p. p. 72
Date Filed: February 13, 2026 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) in response to information requests from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). It provides details on capital expenditures and related planning.

Section 646 p. p. 72
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the NSEB regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It focuses on the capital expenditure planning process and related financial and operational considerations.

Section 648 p. p. 72
3 $2,881,238. 2 ( b) Year-end spending for D010 was $11,944,226. Year end spending for T010 was

AI summary The document outlines year-end spending figures for two projects: D010 with a total of $11,944,226 and T010, although the latter's amount is not fully specified in the provided text.

Section 651 p. p. 72
22 A key risk that could impact the submission is access to resources. Completing the second 23 phase of the RFP process and developing the capital filing require key technology and 24 business resources.

AI summary A key risk identified is the potential lack of access to necessary technology and business resources, which could hinder the completion of the second phase of the RFP process and the development of the capital filing.

Section 660 p. p. 72
5 (d) The expected lead time for most boiler components is typically 12 to 16 weeks, particularly 6 for boiler tubing, which has no standard sizing or metallurgy and therefore requires 7 fabrication to specification. 8 9 (i) Parts such as...

AI summary The document discusses the lead times for boiler components, particularly boiler tubing, which requires custom fabrication. Inventory management strategies are outlined to ensure availability of parts before and during outages. Any substitutions during an outage must be approved by the regulator.

CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) p. p. 72
CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) 1 Request IR-63: 2 3 G01: C0080206 POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 4 5 Please provide a copy of the Point Aconi "Boiler Tube Repair Thermal Maintenance Practice 6 (TMP-004)", as identified in the 2022 ACE Plan....

AI summary The document discusses a request for information regarding the Point Aconi boiler refurbishment project under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. It confirms that boiler tubes will not be replaced unless they reach 50% of their original wall thickness, with exceptions for safety reasons based on inspection data.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 168-169
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 2 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted attachment from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). It includes a figure related to the plan, though the content is confidential and not fully visible.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 169-170
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 3 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) includes a figure illustrating key aspects of the plan. The document is part of a regulatory proceeding with the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB).

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 170-171
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), which includes a redacted figure and is part of an information request (IR-70).

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 8 p. pp. 171-172
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 8

AI summary The document appears to be a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of an information request (IR-70). It includes a figure, but no textual content is provided to analyze further.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 172-173
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). It includes a figure related to the plan, though the content is partially confidential and not fully visible.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 173-174
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document contains a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of an information request (IR-70). The page includes a figure that is partially obscured due to confidentiality restrictions.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 8 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 174
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-70 Attachment 1 Page 8 of 8 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) HARROURSIDE BOREHOLE RECORD Service Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Control of the Cont...

AI summary The document is a redacted attachment related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) Information Request 70. It includes a repeated entry for 'HARROURSIDE BOREHOLE RECORD Service Control' and appears to be incomplete or partially redacted.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 179
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 4 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document refers to an RFP (Request for Proposal) issued by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

8.1 Organizational Capabilities p. pp. 179-180
8.1 Organizational Capabilities

AI summary This section discusses the organizational capabilities of the Nova Scotia Energy Board and Nova Scotia Power Inc. in the context of capital expenditures, reliability, and grid management. It highlights the importance of infrastructure planning and the role of various programs and initiatives in maintaining system reliability.

Brief Overview of Company p. p. 180
Brief Overview of Company Company Name: Dexter Construction Company Limited 927 Rocky Lake Drive, PO Box 48100 Bedford, Nova Scotia B4A 3Z2 Phone: (902) 835-3381 Length of Time in Business: 64 Years Dexter Construction Company Limited (Dex...

AI summary This document provides a brief overview of Dexter Construction Company Limited, highlighting its 64 years in business, areas of expertise, and experience working with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and other industrial clients. It also mentions the use of Connors Diving Services Ltd. as a subcontractor.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 180
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 5 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document refers to an RFP (Request for Proposal) issued by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project. The document is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and is associated with Information Request 71 from the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 181
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 6 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document references a request for proposal (RFP) by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 182
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 7 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary This document references a request for proposal (RFP) by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 8 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 183
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 8 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document references Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's RFP-06/2025-545 for the Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project, part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB).

8.3 Project Plan p. pp. 183-184
8.3 Project Plan

AI summary Section 8.3 of the document outlines the Project Plan, which includes details related to capital expenditures, infrastructure planning, and regulatory compliance. The plan addresses initiatives such as the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It involves various entities and programs aimed at improving grid reliability and energy efficiency.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 9 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 184-185
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 9 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment work will be performed by Dexter.

AI summary The document references a request for proposal (RFP-06/2025-545) by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project, which will be carried out by Dexter.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 10 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 185
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 10 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document references a Request for Proposal (RFP) by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 11 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 186
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 11 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document references Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's RFP-06/2025-545 related to the Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project, indicating a capital expenditure initiative under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 12 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 187
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 12 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary This document references Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's RFP-06/2025-545 for the Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project, which is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB).

8.6 Specialized Services p. pp. 187-188
8.6 Specialized Services

AI summary The section titled '8.6 Specialized Services' introduces various specialized services and initiatives related to energy and utility management in Nova Scotia, including capital expenditure planning, reliability cost efficiency, and customer interruption metrics. It outlines the context and acronyms used in the proceeding.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 13 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 188
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 13 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary This document is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, focusing on the RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project. It is an attachment to an information request (IR-71) from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB).

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 14 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 189
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 14 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document references a request for proposal (RFP) by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

Details and Cost of Extended Warranty Options p. p. 190
Details and Cost of Extended Warranty Options Extended warranty options to be determined upon project specific requests. 2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 15 of 139 Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreli...

AI summary The document discusses extended warranty options for specific projects and references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, along with an RFP from Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 18 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 193
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 18 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document outlines a Request for Proposal (RFP) by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 19 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 194
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 19 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document refers to an RFP (Request for Proposal) issued by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 20 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 195
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 20 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document is an attachment to an information request (IR-71) related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated. It includes a request for proposal (RFP-06/2025-545) for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 22 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 197
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 22 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document references an RFP (Request for Proposal) issued by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 24 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 199
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 24 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document refers to an RFP (Request for Proposal) issued by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for the Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project, which is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB).

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 25 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 0
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 25 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary This document is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, specifically referencing an RFP for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 26 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 1
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 26 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document references an RFP (Request for Proposal) submitted by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 27 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 2
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 27 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary The document references a Request for Proposal (RFP) submitted by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan.

i. Worker's Compensation Letter of Good Standing p. pp. 2-3
i. Worker's Compensation Letter of Good Standing 2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 28 of 139 Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary This document refers to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, specifically Attachment 1 of NSEB IR-71, and mentions a Request for Proposal (RFP-06/2025-545) related to the Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 29 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 4
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 29 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary This document refers to an RFP issued by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project as part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 30 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 5
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 30 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Nova Scotia Power Incorporated RFP-06/2025-545 Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment

AI summary This document is an attachment to an information request related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, specifically addressing a request for proposal (RFP) for a Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment project.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 31 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. p. 6
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 31 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) Appendix A

AI summary The text is a page from an attachment to an information request (IR-71) related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). It includes an appendix but does not provide specific details due to redaction.

Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment p. pp. 10-11
Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheet Pile Rock Revetment Company: Dexter Construction Company Limited Client: Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) RFP #: RFP-06/2025-545 Date Prepared: August 18, 2025 2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 35 o...

AI summary The document is a part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) by Dexter Construction Company Limited on behalf of Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI). It includes an attachment related to Information Request 71 (IR-71) and is part of a larger submission.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 38 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 13-14
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 38 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71. It includes a redacted image, likely containing confidential or sensitive information related to the ACE Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 40 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 15-16
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 40 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It is part of a larger, redacted submission and includes confidential information. The content is not visible due to redaction.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 41 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 16-17
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 41 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71 (IR-71). It includes a page from a technical document, likely related to infrastructure or engineering, but key details have been removed due to confidentiality.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 42 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 17-18
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 42 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It contains confidential information and appears to be part of a larger submission with multiple pages.

3.1 Responsibilities p. p. 18
3.1 Responsibilities

AI summary This section outlines the responsibilities related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including the roles of various entities and the processes involved in managing capital expenditures and infrastructure planning.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 43 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 18-19
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 43 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71 (IR-71). It includes confidential information and is part of a larger submission related to capital expenditures and infrastructure planning.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 44 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 19-20
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 44 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The provided text is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71 (IR-71). Due to redaction, no specific details or content from the page are visible or available for analysis.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 45 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 20-21
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 45 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary This document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1, which is part of a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia. The page is redacted, indicating that confidential information has been removed.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 46 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 21-22
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 46 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The text is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71 (IR-71). The page contains confidential information and is part of a larger document discussing capital expenditures, infrastructure planning, and regulatory compliance.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 47 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 22-23
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 47 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is an attachment to an information request (IR-71) related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). It includes a redacted page from the plan, likely containing confidential or sensitive information.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 48 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 23-24
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 48 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71 (IR-71). It contains a redacted image, likely related to technical or financial details of the ACE Plan, but the content is not visible due to confidentiality.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 49 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 24-25
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 49 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It includes a page from a technical document, likely related to infrastructure or engineering, with a placeholder image indicating redacted confidential information.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 50 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 25-26
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 50 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The text is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), which has been redacted due to the presence of confidential information. The page is part of an attachment to Information Request 71 (IR-71) and is part of a larger document that includes technical and operational details related to energy infrastructure planning and management.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 51 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 26-27
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 51 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The text is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. The page contains confidential information and is part of a larger document discussing capital expenditures related to the electricity sector.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 52 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 27-28
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 52 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It includes a page from an attachment, though the content is confidential and not visible.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 53 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 28-29
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 53 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a confidential attachment from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It includes a redacted page from a larger submission, likely containing technical or financial details related to the ACE Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 54 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 29-30
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 54 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71 (IR-71). It includes a table and image, but the content is partially redacted due to confidentiality.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 55 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 30-31
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 55 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It includes confidential information and is part of a larger submission with 139 pages.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 56 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 31-32
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 56 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The text is from a confidential attachment to an information request related to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NSPI) under the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB). The page number and redaction indicate that the content is part of a larger regulatory proceeding, but specific details are not disclosed.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 59 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 34-35
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 59 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted attachment from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) under Information Request 71. It contains confidential information and is part of a larger proceeding related to capital expenditures and regulatory compliance.

Risk Ranking Clarification Table p. p. 35
Risk Ranking Clarification Table Rating Likelihood of Loss Frequency of Exposure Consequence 1 It is almost impossible; likelihood less than 1% chance. Unlikely an individual will be exposed to the hazard while completing the task (e.g., t...

AI summary The Risk Ranking Clarification Table outlines a five-level risk rating system based on likelihood of loss, frequency of exposure, and consequence. It categorizes risks from 1 (almost impossible) to 5 (almost certain), detailing potential injuries, damage, regulatory actions, and environmental impacts for each level. The table is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and is labeled as confidential.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 61 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 36-37
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 61 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It includes a redacted image, likely containing technical or sensitive information related to the ACE Plan.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 62 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 37-38
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 62 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It appears to be part of a larger submission, with details about capital expenditures and infrastructure planning, though specific content has been removed due to confidentiality.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 64 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 39-40
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 64 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71 (IR-71). It includes a visual element (image) but no textual content due to redaction.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 65 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 40-41
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 65 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The text is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71 (IR-71). It includes a redacted image, suggesting the content is confidential and not publicly accessible.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 66 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 41-42
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 66 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71 (IR-71). It includes a table with data related to capital expenditures, potentially involving infrastructure planning and procurement practices.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 67 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 42-43
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 67 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB), specifically Attachment 1 of Information Request 71. It contains confidential information and appears to be part of a larger regulatory proceeding related to capital expenditures and infrastructure planning.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 68 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 43-44
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 68 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71 (IR-71). The content is redacted, indicating that it contains confidential information. It appears to be part of a larger submission related to capital expenditures and infrastructure planning.

8.2 Site Management & Supervisors p. p. 44
8.2 Site Management & Supervisors Dexter Project Manager TBD Phone: Email: Dexter Project Coordinator TBD Phone: Email: Dexter Superintendent TBD Phone: Email: Dexter Foreman TBD Phone: Email: Dexter Site Safety Representative TBD Phone: E...

AI summary The text outlines roles and contact information for project management and site supervision personnel involved in the Dexter and NSPI projects, with references to the 2026 ACE Plan and an attachment to an information request from the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

9.0 Site Procedures p. p. 45
9.0 Site Procedures

AI summary The section outlines site procedures related to energy infrastructure and operations, including capital expenditures, reliability metrics, and compliance with regulatory standards.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 70 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 45-46
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 70 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The text is a redacted page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71 (IR-71). The page contains confidential information and is part of a larger document related to capital expenditures and infrastructure planning.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 71 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 46-47
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 71 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of an information request (IR-71). This page is redacted due to the presence of confidential information.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 72 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 47-48
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 72 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71. It contains redacted confidential information and appears to be part of a larger attachment.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 73 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 48-49
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 73 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a page from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) as part of Information Request 71. The page is redacted, indicating that confidential information has been removed.

Exposure level (dBA) Exposure duration p. p. 49
Exposure level (dBA) Exposure duration 82 16 hours 83 12 hours and 41minutes 84 10 hours and 4 minutes 85 8 hours 88 4 hours 91 2 hours 2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 74 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The table outlines exposure levels in decibels (dBA) and corresponding exposure durations. The text is part of a confidential attachment to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 76 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 51-52
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 76 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted attachment from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It includes a page from a technical report, though the content is not visible due to redaction.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 77 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) p. pp. 52-53
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 1 Page 77 of 139 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED)

AI summary The document is a redacted attachment from the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) in response to Information Request 71. It contains confidential information and is part of a larger proceeding related to capital expenditures and infrastructure planning.

Project Health & Safety Plan p. pp. 94-99
Project Health & Safety Plan 3 Hazard A ssessment 3.1 Was a s ment available and reviewed with e employees? 0 10 ONO 3.2 Project Hazard Assessment Read acknowledgment 3.3 Compre ehensive Hazard Assessment Read acknowledgment 3.4 Δre the re...

AI summary The text outlines a Project Health & Safety Plan, including hazard assessments and tasks related to project planning. It includes a table with questions regarding the availability of hazard assessments, tasks not captured, and controls. The document is part of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and contains redacted confidential information.

Success: All data is valid! p. p. 111
Success: All data is valid! Numeric Status # Item Quantity Required Unit of Measure Unit Price Total Cost Mobilization and Demobilization Success: All values provided #1-1 Mobilization of all necessary equipment, material and labour force....

AI summary The document outlines a cost breakdown for mobilization, demobilization, and various project components, including labor, materials, and equipment costs, with specific amounts allocated for each item.

2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 2 Page 51 of 53 p. p. 164
2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-71 Attachment 2 Page 51 of 53 Success: All values provided #3-1 Labour (Site Labour) 1 Lump Sum $ 50,000.00 $ 50,000.00 Success: All values provided #3-2 Material 1 Lump Sum $ 200,000.00 $ 200,000.00 Success: All valu...

AI summary The document outlines detailed cost breakdowns for various infrastructure projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including labour, materials, equipment, and surveying costs for tasks such as pre-cast box culvert installation, CIP concrete headwall construction, and rock revetment layers.

Wave Conditions During Design Event 200-year Return Period with 2080 SLR p. p. 6
Wave Conditions During Design Event 200-year Return Period with 2080 SLR \ Model results are based on water levels using the TWL EVA 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The document discusses wave conditions during a 200-year return period with 2080 sea level rise, referencing model results based on water levels using the TWL EVA. It also mentions the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) and NSPI responses to NSEB information requests.

REDACTED p. p. 6
REDACTED 1 Request IR-79: 2 3 G03: C0021608 TUC Shoreline Sheetpile Refurbishment 4 5 Please explain what Attachment 2 is intended to represent. 6 7 (a) Please explain how the cost estimates in Attachment 2 were developed. 8 9 (b) Please e...

AI summary The response to Request IR-79 explains that Attachment 2 is a firm price bid from the preferred proponent of the request for proposal, provided to ensure consistent and detailed pricing among bidders for the Shoreline Sheetpile Refurbishment project. It is part of the 2026 ACE Plan and was included for cost support in the detailed cost estimate.

REDACTED p. p. 6
REDACTED 1 (b) The cost estimate on page 191 was completed after the initial option analysis report, whilst 2 Attachment 2 is a firm price resulting from the request from proposal that was supported 3 by the detailed design. They are not i...

AI summary The text discusses the discrepancy between a high-level cost estimate and a firm price from an RFP, attributing the increase to changes in scope, geotechnical findings requiring dredging, and scheduling constraints during a scheduled outage. These factors led to additional costs and complexities.

3 G08: C0080135 CT-BGT2 Engine Refurbishment p. p. 11
3 G08: C0080135 CT-BGT2 Engine Refurbishment 4 - 5 Please provide the budgeted and actual annual capital cost associated with the CT-BGT2 - 6 unit over the past five years. 7 8 Response IR-105: 9 - 10 Please refer to the below table showin...

AI summary The document requests the budgeted and actual annual capital costs for the CT-BGT2 unit over the past five years. A response refers to a table that provides this information for the years 2021 to 2025.

12 p. p. 11
12 Description 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 BGT2 Annual Capital Actuals $ 80,321 $ 36,107 $ 624 $ 27,211 $ 32,848 BGT2 ACE Budgets $0 $ 26,052 $0 $76,143 $50,892 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB I...

AI summary The text presents a table showing capital actuals and budgets for the BGT2 Annual and BGT2 ACE from 2021 to 2025, with references to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) and NSPI responses to NSEB information requests.

14 p. p. 11
14 Year Forecast Sustaining Capital ($) Notes 2026 $2,462,664 Engine refurbishment 2026 $963,769 Free Turbine refurbishment (noted in Appendix B) 2027 $0 No major planned work 2028 ~$300,000 Generator rotor out inspection 2029 $0 No major...

AI summary The text outlines capital expenditure forecasts for 2026 to 2030, including engine and turbine refurbishments, and references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI responses to NSEB information requests.

13 p. p. 11
13 Description 2021 ($) 2022 ($) 2023 ($) 2024 ($) 2025 ($) BGT2 O&MG Actuals 20,539 28,480 42,672 28,307 13,238 BGT Gas Turbine O&MG Budget 822,975 910,568 1,053,750 1,173,611 1,348,268 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12...

AI summary The text presents a table showing actual and budgeted operating and maintenance (O&MG) costs for the BGT2 Gas Turbine from 2021 to 2025, along with references to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests.

17 p. p. 11
17 Replacement Type C0041805 – L-7005 R&U Phase 2 C0041793 – L-7002 R&U Phase 2 Structure 44 58 Insulator 7 Timber and Insulator 15 13 Bond or Guy Wire 2 Other Deteriorated Assets 3 1 Actuals ($) C0041805 – L-7005 R&U C0041793 – L-7002 R&U...

AI summary The text presents data on replacement types and associated costs for two projects, C0041805 – L-7005 R&U Phase 2 and C0041793 – L-7002 R&U Phase 2, including costs for labor, materials, and contracts. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) and NSPI responses to NSEB information requests.

CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) p. p. 11
CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) 1 Request IR-116: 2 3 T02: C0070909, 70W-T52 Transformer Addition 4 5 The application notes three transformers: 70W-T51, 70W-T53, and 89W-T1. Page 365 that 6 the 2006 Bridgewater Area System Planning Study (2...

AI summary The document includes a request (IR-116) related to transformer additions and system planning in Bridgewater, Nova Scotia. It asks for details about feeders, customer counts, load data, installation dates, conversion progress, load transfer, and a 2006 planning report. The response indicates that data prior to 2022 is unavailable due to legacy limitations and provides data from 2022-2025.

Section 1663 p. p. 11
2 (b) Transformer 70W-T53 was installed in 1990 and transformer 89W-T1 was installed in 3 2008. 4 5 (c) No significant 4 kV to 12 kV feeder conversions have been completed in this area in recent 6 years. However, incremental upgrades have...

AI summary The document discusses the installation dates of two transformers and incremental upgrades to the distribution system to support future conversion from 4 kV to 12 kV. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests.

CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) p. pp. 11-73
CONFIDENTIAL (Attachment Only) 1 (e) Capability to transfer load from 70W to 89W is considered in the available contingency 2 capacity as described above. There are no other distribution feeders capable of supplying 3 load to 70W. Please r...

AI summary The document discusses the limited capability to transfer load from specific distribution feeders in the area north of the substation, highlighting constraints in the electrical grid infrastructure. It also references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is part of a regulatory proceeding (NSEB M12619).

Section 1668 p. p. 73
Appendix A: System Data Summary Appendix B: Economic Analysis Data Appendix C: Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria

AI summary The document includes appendices summarizing system data, economic analysis data, and capital expenditure justification criteria. These appendices likely provide technical and financial details relevant to regulatory proceedings.

4.0 CAPITAL CRITERIA VIOLATIONS AND ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS p. p. 94
4.0 CAPITAL CRITERIA VIOLATIONS AND ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS Refer to Appendix C for relevant sections of the NSPI Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria.

AI summary This section discusses capital criteria violations and alternative solutions, referring to Appendix C for relevant sections of the NSPI Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria.

It involves the following work: p. p. 94
It involves the following work: - Install mobile sub-station at 89W prior to station work in 2004 - Move 89W-T1 to stores in 2004 - Remove the existing concrete pad at 89W in 2004 - Install a new pad complete with oil containment in 2004 -...

AI summary The document outlines a series of infrastructure upgrades and expansions at Sub-station 89W between 2004 and 2010, including transformer installation, pad upgrades, and new circuits to improve capacity and support new developments in Bridgewater.

Economic Analysis p. p. 94
Economic Analysis The relevant financial data, economic analysis calculations, NPV results, and alternative summary sheets have been included in Appendix B of this report. Alternative A-1: Add a new Transformer at 70W and Offload 89W NP Co...

AI summary The economic analysis evaluates three alternatives for transformer upgrades, concluding that replacing the 89W-T1 with a new 15/20/25 MVA transformer (Alternative A-2) is the most cost-effective option, with a net present cost of $1,089,970.

Economic Analysis: p. p. 94
Economic Analysis: The relevant financial data, economic analysis calculations, NPV results, and alternative summary sheets have been included in Appendix B of this report. Alternative B-1: Replace 70W-T1 in 2009 at the end of its Expected...

AI summary The economic analysis compares two alternatives for infrastructure upgrades: replacing 70W-T1 in 2009 at the end of its life and converting 4kV circuits to 12kV in 2009. The analysis concludes that converting to 12kV is the more economical option with a lower net present cost.

Qualitative Analysis p. p. 94
Qualitative Analysis 70W-T51: Replacing 70W-T51 at the end of its expected life is the simplest means of correcting this issue. However, this option goes against current practices within NSPI, which involve the phasing out of 4kV whenever...

AI summary The text discusses the replacement of 70W-T51 lighting and the aging 4kV sub-station transformers on NSPI's system. It notes that replacing 70W-T51 is simple but conflicts with NSPI's practice of phasing out 4kV. The remaining 4kV transformers are aging and may fail by 2010, with replacement perpetuating 4kV use. The High Street sub-station also requires conversion of 4kV circuits to 12kV.

Solution: p. p. 94
Solution: The creation of a new circuit at 89W in 2010 will permit the offloading of circuit 70W-322 by 2-3 MVA, which will defer the need for additional capacity at High Street for an additional 4 years. REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-116...

AI summary A new circuit created in 2010 at 89W allows for the offloading of circuit 70W-322 by 2-3 MVA, delaying the need for additional capacity at High Street for four more years.

Effects on Distribution Work p. p. 105
Effects on Distribution Work As a result of the uncertainty regarding the long term future of the Westhavers Elbow 69kV Sub-transmission System, the replacement transformer for the Bridgewater East Sub-station should be rated for both 69kV...

AI summary The uncertainty surrounding the future of the Westhavers Elbow 69kV Sub-transmission System has led to the recommendation that the replacement transformer for the Bridgewater East Sub-station be rated for both 69kV and 138kV operation.

Sub-transmission System p. p. 105
Sub-transmission System - .1 Proceed with the recommendations of Alternative A-2: Replace 89W-T1 with a New 15/20/25 MVA Transformer in 2004. This option involves the following work: - Install mobile sub-station at 89W prior to station wor...

AI summary The text outlines several recommended actions for upgrading the sub-transmission system, including transformer replacements, line reconduction, and voltage upgrades. Alternative A-2 involves replacing a transformer and expanding the sub-station, while Alternative B-2 focuses on converting 4kV circuits to 12kV. These options are evaluated based on cost differences compared to other alternatives.

Bridgewater Study Summary of Alternatives p. p. 113
Bridgewater Study Summary of Alternatives Budget Year : 2004 Date: 30-Nov-06 Division : CI Number: Department : Project No. : Originator: X Alternative After Tax WACC PV of EVA / NPV Rank IRR Disc Pay Α Add Capacity to 70W and Offload 89W...

AI summary The Bridgewater Study Summary of Alternatives presents four alternatives for a project, each with financial metrics such as After Tax WACC, PV of EVA / NPV, Rank, IRR, and Discounted Payback. Alternative D is ranked first with a PV of EVA / NPV of 0, while the other alternatives have negative values.

Test 4 Not Applicable p. p. 113
REDACTED 2026 ACE Plan NSEB IR-116 Attachment 1 Page 42 of 52 Test 4 Not Applicable (6,756,0) - 43,47.0 1,729,528.0 (6,254,6) - 43,47.0 1,729,528.0 (6,254,6) - 43,47.0 1,729,528.0 (6,254,6) - 43,47.0 1,729,528.0 (6,520.1) - 43,47.0 1,729,5...

AI summary The document contains a section from a 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, specifically Attachment 1 of the NSEB IR-116, which appears to include financial and numerical data related to capital expenditures. However, the content is heavily redacted and lacks detailed explanations or context.

N.S.P.I Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria - System Design p. p. 121
N.S.P.I Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria - System Design The NSPI capital expenditure justification criteria that are applicable to this study are:

AI summary The document outlines the NSPI capital expenditure justification criteria applicable to the study, focusing on system design aspects.

Section 1901 p. p. 121
10 (c) The "oil tank" is the main transformer tank, and it is 60 years old alongside all the 11 internal components. Replacing the main tank only to put a 60-year-old core and coil 12 assembly inside of it would result in significant costs...

AI summary The text discusses the aging transformer at 96H-T1, noting that replacing only the main tank without updating the 60-year-old internal components would be costly and ineffective. Refurbishment would require extended downtime and increased costs. NS Power uses a risk-assessment methodology aligned with the CEJC Risk Matrix to evaluate the transformer's condition and criticality.

Year Avoided OM&G ($) p. p. 154
Year Avoided OM&G ($) 2026 1,878,737 2027 2,123,374 2028 2,247,527 2029 2,281,240 2030 2,315,459 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The table shows the amount of Avoided OM&G costs from 2026 to 2030. It references the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI responses to NSEB information requests.

10 Table 2 p. p. 154
10 Table 2 Consulting Estimate ($) Avg Cost Per Site ($) Tower Analysis/Upgrades Lot 1 $ 200,000 $25,000 Contracts Civil Construction Lot 1 $ 428,750 $20,417 Telecom Construction Lot 1 $ 521,000 $24,810 11

AI summary Table 2 outlines estimated costs for various consulting and construction activities, including tower analysis, civil construction, and telecom construction, with associated average costs per site.

Section 2058 p. p. 154
202,584 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The document refers to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests. It highlights regulatory proceedings related to capital expenditures and information disclosure.

Section 2096 p. p. 69
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The document pertains to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to information requests from the NSEB. It outlines capital expenditure planning and related regulatory responses.

Section 2119 p. p. 69
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan submitted by NSP in response to information requests from the NSEB. It provides details on capital expenditures and related financial planning for the upcoming year.

22 p. p. 69
22 Transformer Location Region Activity Justification 91H-T11 Dartmouth Metro Replacement Please refer to CI C0031048 in 2025 ACE Plan. 10H-T1 Halifax Metro Replacement Please refer to CI C0055539 in 2023 ACE Plan. 10H-T2 Halifax Metro Rep...

AI summary The text provides a table detailing transformer replacement projects in Nova Scotia, referencing the 2025 and 2023 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plans. It includes transformer locations, regions, activities, and justifications, with references to specific CI numbers and regulatory approvals by the NSEB.

Section 2131 p. p. 69
C0031069 L6020 Replacements and 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests

AI summary This document refers to the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and NSPI's responses to NSEB Information Requests, indicating a regulatory proceeding involving capital expenditure planning and information disclosure.

N-7NSPI (SBA) RIR 1 to 29 5 passages
Request IR-1: p. p. 0
Request IR-1: - Refer to M12619, Exhibit N-1, the Application for Approval of NS Power's 2026 Annual - Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (the "Application"), Page 22 of 782, Section 4, Annual - Capital Expenditure Plan Follow Up, and item 4),...

AI summary The Board directs NS Power to update information regarding priority distribution feeders in the 2026 ACE Plan, referencing specific figures and appendices in the application. It also refers to figures showing Right of Way (ROW) investment in the plan.

Figure 33: 2026 Distribution Vegetation Work Plan by Regio[n2](#page-0-1) p. p. 0
Figure 33: 2026 Distribution Vegetation Work Plan by Regio[n2](#page-0-1) Region Distribution Spans Kms Metro 1,770 97 Northeast 2,576 145 East 4,020 224 West 7,125 396 Total 15,491 862 Figure 34: 2026 Distribution Corridor Widening with M...

AI summary The document presents two figures related to the 2026 Distribution Vegetation Work Plan and the 2026 Distribution Corridor Widening with Managed Rights-of-Way (ROW) by region. The data includes the number of spans and kilometers for each region, along with total figures. The text also references an application for approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan by NS Power.

3 M12619, Exhibit N-1, Application, Appendix G, Figure 34, page 53 of 71, line 2. p. p. 0
3 M12619, Exhibit N-1, Application, Appendix G, Figure 34, page 53 of 71, line 2. 1 (a) What is the total amount of investment planned for 2026 for the ROW projects shown 2 in Figure 33 and Figure 34? 3 4 (b) What is the share of this tota...

AI summary The document outlines questions and responses related to the planned investment for ROW projects in 2026, including the share of this investment relative to total distribution and T&D projects, expected improvements in reliability, and the impact on priority feeders and customer classes.

- (ii) Have decreased investment planned for 2026. p. p. 8
- (ii) Have decreased investment planned for 2026. 1 (b) Please explain which of the CEJC rating criteria listed on Page 89 of 782, Lines 4-12 2 were relied on to determine this positive or negative change in investment level for 3 each un...

AI summary The response outlines units with increased and decreased investment planned for 2026, citing criteria such as Health & Safety, Environment/Regulatory Compliance, and Business Sustainability. The 2026 investment plan uses a bottom-up approach and differs from the Evergreen IRP, focusing on risk mitigation rather than long-term planning.

(b) "Regular" refers to Regular Administrative Overhead, also known as Labour AO. NS Power has three types of AO Rates, which are calculated in accordance with Board- p. p. 8
(b) "Regular" refers to Regular Administrative Overhead, also known as Labour AO. NS Power has three types of AO Rates, which are calculated in accordance with Board- 1 approved Accounting Policy 6230 – Application of Administrative and Ve...

AI summary The text discusses the calculation of Administrative Overhead (AO) rates by NS Power, highlighting that AO rates are based on budgeted overhead costs relative to capital labour costs. It explains that increased AO rates may not reflect higher costs but could result from lower capital labour budgets or increased administrative support. Outsourcing efforts may reduce AO rates but could increase overall capital program costs.

N-8NSPI (CA) RIR 19 - Revised 1 passage
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests
2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (NSEB M12619) NSPI Responses to Consumer Advocate Information Requests

AI summary This document outlines NSPI's responses to information requests from the Consumer Advocate regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is part of the NSEB M12619 proceeding.

N-9Evidence of John D. Wilson - CA 16 passages
Q: Please summarize NS Power's application. p. p. 3
Q: Please summarize NS Power's application. A: NS Power is seeking Board approval of 20 capital work orders and the 2026 capital routine program with total project investment of $284 million[.](#page-3-1) 1 Together with capital projects u...

AI summary NS Power is seeking approval for 20 capital work orders and the 2026 capital routine program totaling $284 million. The overall 2026 capital budget, including other projects and carryover spending, is estimated at $702.1 million. Supporting documents include updates to the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria, Mersey Update, Path to 2030, and Five-Year Reliability Plan.

Q: What is the purpose of your testimony? p. p. 3
Q: What is the purpose of your testimony? A: I have reviewed most of the issues identified by the Board as well as the specific projects that NS Power seeks approval in its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for 2025. I have not identified an...

AI summary The testimony aims to review NS Power's 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan, focusing on cost minimization, risk matrices, and reliability projects. It also addresses concerns about the 2026 ACE Plan budget and reviews updates to the CEJC, Mersey Hydro, and Path to 2030 reports.

A. Enhancing cost minimization in capital routines p. p. 5
A. Enhancing cost minimization in capital routines

AI summary The section discusses strategies for enhancing cost minimization in capital routines, focusing on optimizing processes and reducing expenses associated with capital projects.

Q: Is there any further evidence that NS Power lacks internal controls to ensure effective planning of resources to minimize costs? p. pp. 5-7
Q: Is there any further evidence that NS Power lacks internal controls to ensure effective planning of resources to minimize costs? A: Yes, NS Power does not utilize a Basis of Schedule practice, or its equivalent, for its capital routine...

AI summary NS Power does not use a Basis of Schedule practice for its capital routine projects, which may indicate a lack of internal controls for resource planning. However, for some routines, this is reasonable due to their reactive nature. For other routines, an equivalent practice could help avoid delays and costs. NS Power has reported efficiency improvements from implementing new software, resulting in $2.7 million in savings.

Q: What are your recommendations for the Board? p. p. 8
Q: What are your recommendations for the Board? - A: I have three recommendations to enhance cost minimization in capital routines. First, I recommend that the Board revise its reporting requirement for the Work Management and Scheduling &...

AI summary The witness recommends three actions for the Board to enhance cost minimization in capital routines. These include revising reporting requirements, extending reporting timelines, and exploring software capabilities for operational efficiency. The recommendations also suggest expanding the use of software tools and applying these practices beyond distribution routines.

Q: What contingency amount does NS Power use for transmission projects that do not have risk matrices prepared? p. p. 11
Q: What contingency amount does NS Power use for transmission projects that do not have risk matrices prepared? A: NS Power appears to routinely include a 15% contingency in transmission line and transformer project budgets where no risk m...

AI summary NS Power uses a 15% contingency in transmission projects without risk matrices, citing routine nature and controlled costs. Five cases in this proceeding follow this practice, while one project has a 20% contingency with a risk matrix.

Q: If your deduction is correct, is a policy to not utilize a risk matrix or detailed schedule for projects with a 15% contingency reasonable? p. p. 11
Q: If your deduction is correct, is a policy to not utilize a risk matrix or detailed schedule for projects with a 15% contingency reasonable? A: No. If these projects are so well understood and so consistent, then a much smaller contingen...

AI summary The response argues that not using a risk matrix or detailed schedule for projects with a 15% contingency is unreasonable, especially if projects frequently exceed budgets. It emphasizes the importance of proactive risk management to minimize costs for capital projects.

Q: Could a smaller contingency budget increase the number of ATO proceedings? p. pp. 11-13
Q: Could a smaller contingency budget increase the number of ATO proceedings? A: Yes, a possible consequence of the Board adopting my recommendation is that there could be slightly more ATO proceedings. From a cost minimization perspective...

AI summary A smaller contingency budget may lead to more ATO proceedings, as they can identify risks that lead to overspending in capital projects. Examples include the L6549 transmission line project and the 76V-T1 Transformer Replacement, where unexpected costs led to increased ATO budgets. Improved planning and risk management could help mitigate these issues.

Q: Do you have any other comments on NS Power's vegetation management program? p. pp. 15-16
Q: Do you have any other comments on NS Power's vegetation management program? A: Yes. In a response to an information request, NS Power seems to suggest that it was able to "exceed the planned kms" of trimming and removal of trees through...

AI summary The response discusses NS Power's vegetation management program, noting that it shifted resources from capital projects to operating expenses for tree trimming. The responder acknowledges this as an efficient reallocation but hopes the good practices and cost minimization are ongoing.

VI. CEJC Updates p. pp. 18-19
VI. CEJC Updates - Q: Please summarize the scope of the updates to the Capital Expenditure - Justification Criteria (CEJC). - A: NS Power is proposing revisions to the CEJC to address a definition of scope change, - revision to the undersp...

AI summary NS Power is proposing revisions to the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC), including a definition of scope change, revision to the underspend FIN threshold, and updates to the timeline for filing a FIN filing.

Q: Has NS Power suggested any further changes to its definition of scope change? p. pp. 19-20
Q: Has NS Power suggested any further changes to its definition of scope change? A: Yes, in response to an information request, NS Power suggested that the ambiguity in its original proposal could be resolved by adding further language, bo...

AI summary NS Power has suggested adding further language to its definition of scope change to resolve ambiguity. The updated definition clarifies that a scope change occurs when the alternative defended in the 'Why do this Project This Way' section of a capital application changes, aiming to provide more clarity and reduce subjectivity.

Q: What concerns do you have with this remaining ambiguity? p. p. 20
Q: What concerns do you have with this remaining ambiguity? A: In my opinion, this ambiguity has the potential to undermine the intent of Section 35 of the Public Utilities Act . The Act requires each capital item in excess of $1 million t...

AI summary The ambiguity in the capital project approval process may undermine Section 35 of the Public Utilities Act, which requires approval for capital items over $1 million. The process aims to reduce the need for retrospective reviews but shifts oversight from proactive to retrospective proceedings, raising concerns about regulatory risk and stakeholder input.

Q: Do you have a recommendation for the Board to refine NS Power's proposed definition of scope change? p. pp. 20-22
Q: Do you have a recommendation for the Board to refine NS Power's proposed definition of scope change? A: Yes. I recommend that NS Power's clarification be accepted and that the CEJC be further revised to include a two-step process that f...

AI summary The responder recommends refining NS Power's definition of scope change by introducing a two-step process. The first step involves NS Power filing a brief letter with the Board when a potential budget increase is identified. The second step allows the Board to request a more formal evaluation of alternatives if needed, avoiding unnecessary regulatory burdens.

Q: Do you have any further proposed revisions to the CEJC? p. p. 23
Q: Do you have any further proposed revisions to the CEJC? A: Yes, I recommend two further revisions to the CEJC not directly related to any proposals from NS Power. First, I recommend that the introduction be revised to reflect the Board'...

AI summary The respondent recommends revising the CEJC to reflect the Board's decision in M12012, which requires NS Power to submit capital expenditures over $1 million for approval, regardless of funding source. This revision aims to align the CEJC with the Public Utilities Act and the oversight role of the NSEB.

Q: How do the three alternatives discussed in the net present value (NPV) analysis compare? p. p. 24
Q: How do the three alternatives discussed in the net present value (NPV) analysis compare? A: From an investment perspective, redevelopment requires by far the greatest expenditure.[57](#page-24-5) Redevelopment requires a nominal investm...

AI summary The NPV analysis compares three alternatives for a project, with redevelopment requiring the highest investment ($1.2 billion) but offering significant benefits ($475 million in energy and capacity value). Full decommissioning is much cheaper ($512 million), and partial decommissioning is excluded due to its lack of appeal. Redevelopment's NPV is $560 million, while decommissioning is $196 million.

EXPERT TESTIMONY p. p. 28
rid Nova Scotia Project on behalf of the Nova Scotia Consumer Advocate. Cost classification, decommissioning costs, justification for software vendor selection, and suggested changes to project scope. Nova Scotia UARB Matter No. M09499, di...

AI summary Paul Chernick provided expert testimony on various matters related to Nova Scotia Power's capital expenditures, decommissioning costs, and load forecasts, as well as on electric vehicle charging programs in California. The testimony focused on cost justification, project scope, and ensuring alignment with regulatory goals and budget controls.

N-102025 Q4 Capital Reports 10 passages
(3) Spending on projects started prior to 2025, not in the 2025 ACE Plan: Top 10 projects that were included in prior ACE Plans or approved prior to 2025
(3) Spending on projects started prior to 2025, not in the 2025 ACE Plan: Top 10 projects that were included in prior ACE Plans or approved prior to 2025 CI Project Title Functional Class 2025 Generation C0054356 C0053916 CT BGT4 Engine P6...

AI summary The document details spending on top 10 projects initiated prior to 2025, which are not included in the 2025 Affordable Clean Energy (ACE) Plan. These projects span various functional classes, including generation, transmission, and general plant, with associated costs and approvals referenced by Order to Quash (OTQ) and ACE Plan years.

4th Quarter Overview - as of December 31, 2025
4th Quarter Overview - as of December 31, 2025 This report includes a list of all FIN capital work orders that have fallen outside the timelines under the CEJC. (Within six months of in-service.) These projects have either been completed a...

AI summary The 4th Quarter Overview report details FIN capital work orders that have fallen outside the timelines under the CEJC, with projects either completed or forecasted to be outside FIN tolerances of +/- 5% or +/- $250,000.

Projects that have been in-service for 6 months, but have a project forecast within the allowed FIN tolerance, are not included on this list.
Projects that have been in-service for 6 months, but have a project forecast within the allowed FIN tolerance, are not included on this list. Spend to December Project # Project In-service Date NSEB Approval 31, 2025 Comment C0033644 2021-...

AI summary The text outlines that projects in-service for six months with forecasts within allowed FIN tolerance are excluded from the list. It includes a table showing two completed projects with their costs and planned final cost applications in 2026, followed by a section titled 'NS Power Unapproved Spending'.

As of December 31, 2025
As of December 31, 2025 This report includes all projects that have been removed from rate base per the conditions as established and approved in the CEJC and Accounting Policy 1520 - Rate Base, and their associated 2025 Income Statement i...

AI summary This report outlines projects removed from the rate base based on conditions from the CEJC and Accounting Policy 1520. It includes amendments related to 'Forgone Earning Potential' and a new approval threshold of $1,000,000 effective October 30, 2019.

Periods not Included in Approval Unapproved Depreciation Expense on Unapproved Interest Expense on Unapproved AFUDC on Unapprov
(2) Capital Spend above $1,000,000 ($250,000 prior to October 30, 2019) associated with a preliminary engineering project that has been inactive (i.e. no internal or external engineering or scoping work, exceeding $10,000, being carried ou...

AI summary The table outlines a capital spend project titled 'WRC LEM Penstock Intake' under the Hydro Plant functional class, with a threshold of $1,000,000 and a total spend of $1,206,698. The project is expected to impact the 2025 income statement and has a potential 2025 impact of $5,891. The filing date is expected for 2026.

Unapproved Spending Over $1M As of December 31, 2025
Unapproved Spending Over $1M As of December 31, 2025 This report includes all capital projects greater than $1 million that are within the rate base thresholds as established and approved in the CEJC and Accounting Policy 1520 - Rate Base,...

AI summary This report outlines unapproved capital projects exceeding $1 million as of December 31, 2025, which are within the rate base thresholds established by the CEJC and Accounting Policy 1520. It complies with the NSEB's directive from August 30, 2017 (M07568), and differs from prior reports by including projects still within the rate base.

Note 2: This report has been amended to reflect the new Board approval threshold of $1,000,000, effective October 30, 2019.
20472 11506 LIVE AA PE 20.070.004 20.070.440 Preliminary Engineering efforts to determine the scope / cost of the

AI summary The text references a preliminary engineering effort to determine the scope and cost of a project, identified by the reference number 20472 11506. It is part of a regulatory proceeding and includes a note about an amended approval threshold effective October 30, 2019.

2025 Capital Write Offs in Excess of $1,000,000
2025 Capital Write Offs in Excess of $1,000,000 This report includes capital write offs in excess of $1,000,000. A write-off occurs typically when a capital project is no longer feasible and will not proceed. The costs associated with thes...

AI summary This report details capital write-offs exceeding $1,000,000, which occur when projects are no longer feasible. These costs are written off to operating expenses. The report complies with NS Power's 2016 commitment and reflects a 2019 Board-approved threshold.

CI Number Project Title Value Description
CI Number Project Title Value Description There were no write-offs in excess of $1,000,000 in 2025. Routine Capital Reconciliation to 2025 ACE - as of December 31, 2025 2025 ACE Plan Variance Amount (2025) 2025 Spend Actual/ACE Generation...

AI summary The document outlines the 2025 ACE Plan's routine capital reconciliation, detailing spending variances across various categories such as generation, transmission, distribution, and general plant. The total routine capital spending for 2025 was approximately $188.015 million, with a variance of $6.583 million.

2025 ACE Carryover Spending - as of December 31, 2025
2025 ACE Carryover Spending - as of December 31, 2025 Project 2025 ACE Plan 2025 ACE Plan Amount C0063550 ICP Conveyor Take-Up Refurbishment 138,620 521,299 4,883 (133,737) 49036 HYD - Avon 2 Controls Upgrade 391,178 496,293 502,010 110,83...

AI summary The document outlines the 2025 ACE Carryover Spending as of December 31, 2025, listing various projects with their associated costs and financial details. It includes a table with project names, costs, and amounts related to different initiatives.

N-11CA (IG) RIR 1 to 3 6 passages
1 2025 M12619
1 2025 M12619 2 3 4 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 5 6 7 8 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act 9 10 11 12 IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) 13 for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its...

AI summary This document is a response to information requests related to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's (NS Power) 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals approximately $702.1 million. The response is submitted by the Consumer Advocate (CA) and is addressed to legal representatives at Industrial Group and Stewart McKelvey.

15 Response:
15 Response: 16 17 In Exhibit N-10, the 2025 Q4 Capital Reports, several projects include Actual Spend values that 18 are significantly less than the values reported in Exhibit N-1(iii). Since Exhibit N-10 was prepared 19 after Exhibit N-1...

AI summary The document highlights discrepancies between actual spending figures for several capital projects in Exhibit N-1(iii) and Exhibit N-10, particularly noting a significant decline in spending for the ECC Dynamic Line Rating Implementation project and the absence of actual spend for seven projects in Exhibit N-10.

30 31
30 31 Status Category CI Number Title Actual Spend Exh N-1(iii) Actual Spend Exh N-10 Less than $1M General Plant C0061285 IT - Enterprise Governance, Risk and Compliance $256,112 Deferred Approved Transmission 49790 L5505 Replacements and...

AI summary The document outlines various capital expenditures and their statuses, including approved, pending submission, and awaiting approval. It includes details on projects such as generator replacements, transmission upgrades, and IT infrastructure, with actual spend amounts and deferred or not reported figures.

Preamble
3 Preamble: Mr. Wilson observes that NSPI frequently applies a 15% contingency amount to transmission line and transformer project budgets where no risk matrix is prepared and infers that this reflects a de facto company policy. He recomme...

AI summary The document discusses a recommendation by Mr. Wilson to cap contingency amounts at 10% for transmission projects without a risk matrix, currently set at 15% by NSPI. It requests explanations on the impact of this cap, its scope, and whether other jurisdictions have similar policies.

23 (a) See table below.
23 (a) See table below. Proposed (15% Contingency) Recommended (10% Contingency) CI Project Contingency Budget Contingency Budget C0080110 L7012 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 639,635 5,370,318 426,423 5,157,106 C0070909 70W-T52 Transfo...

AI summary The table outlines proposed and recommended budgets for various projects, including transformer replacements and upgrades, with different contingency percentages applied. The total proposed budget is $17,266,333 with a 15% contingency, while the recommended budget is $16,656,845 with a 10% contingency. The net change between the two is a reduction of $609,488.

Request IR-3:
Request IR-3: Reference: Exhibit N-9, Evidence of John D. Wilson, pages 21 – 24. Preamble: Mr. Wilson reviewed NSPI's proposed "scope change", finding that significant ambiguity remains, and expressing concern that the proposed definition...

AI summary Mr. John D. Wilson reviewed NSPI's proposed 'scope change' and expressed concerns about ambiguity and oversight. He proposed a two-step process for NS Power to notify the Board of significant project changes, including a threshold for budget increases and the need for alternative evaluations.

N-12Rebuttal Evidence - NS Power 9 passages
Nova Scotia Energy Board p. p. 2
Nova Scotia Energy Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for Approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (M12619)

AI summary This document pertains to an application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The matter number is M12619.

2026 ACE Plan p. p. 2
2026 ACE Plan

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines Nova Scotia Power's proposed annual capital expenditures for the year 2026, detailing the company's investment strategy and financial commitments.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 2
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 4 2.0 RESPONSE TO CA (WILSON) EVIDENCE 5 5 2.1 Recommendation 1 – Work Management and Scheduling & Dispatch 5 6 2.2 Recommendation 2 – Maximo/Salesforce Capabilities5 7 2.3 Recomm...

AI summary This document outlines Nova Scotia Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which includes capital investments for 2026 and future spending forecasts up to 2030. It discusses responses to evidence from the Consumer Advocate and other stakeholders, as well as recommendations related to work management, project contingency, and reliability planning.

Section 5 p. p. 2
DATE FILED: April 8, 2026 Page 3 of 19 Exhibit N-6 (C), NS Power (NSEB) IRs 1-202, February 13, 2026. Exhibit N-3 (C), NS Power (CA) IRs 1-32, February 13, 2026 Exhibit N-5, NS Power (IG) IRs 1-25, February 13, 2026 Exhibit N-7, NS Power (...

AI summary The document references exhibits submitted by NS Power in a regulatory proceeding, including evidence related to projects that the company seeks approval for from the NSEB. The context suggests ongoing regulatory review of electricity delivery and capital expenditure matters.

DATE FILED: April 8, 2026 Page 4 of 19 p. pp. 4-7
DATE FILED: April 8, 2026 Page 4 of 19 1 2.0 RESPONSE TO CA (WILSON) EVIDENCE 12 beneficial results in 2026. In light of these factors, NS Power believes the existing methodology is 13 appropriate. 14 15 2.5 Recommendation 5 – Monitor Exte...

AI summary NS Power responds to evidence from CA (Wilson) by stating that it already monitors external factors influencing costs in customer-driven routines as part of its capital planning and oversight processes. Examples include advanced procurement of materials and long-term agreements for work vehicles.

Section 12 p. p. 9
maximum thresholds reviewed and adjusted as system conditions, asset risks, and supply chain realities evolve. Further, NS Power notes that the existence of an inventory alone is not determinative of whether pooling is appropriate. The ope...

AI summary NS Power argues that its current spare inventory management practices are sufficient and that pooling arrangements may not align with its restoration obligations. It highlights prior filings and responses to information requests that demonstrate its governance and oversight of spare equipment. NS Power does not support the implication that spare inventory pooling is a more cost-effective or lower-risk alternative to its existing strategy.

DATE FILED: April 8, 2026 Page 11 of 19 p. pp. 9-14
DATE FILED: April 8, 2026 Page 11 of 19 1 2.10 Recommendation 10 – Accept NS Power's Clarification of "Scope Change" 2 3 4 The Wilson Evidence provides the following recommendation: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Accept NS Power's clarification to the de...

AI summary The document discusses a recommendation to accept NS Power's clarification of 'scope change' in the CEJC and to revise it to include a requirement for NS Power to file information when a change may result in a budget increase above a Board-specified threshold. NS Power accepts part of the recommendation and provides an amended definition for 'scope change'.

2.17 Mersey Hydro Update The Wilson Evidence expressed concern that NS Power "does not have a strong plan for protecting customers from excessive costs when dealing with the potential redevelopment or decommissioning of the Mersey Hydro project". Currently, NS Power is continuing to invest significant sums to "ensure the continued safe operation" of Mersey facilities while it has deferred a full application for either redevelopment or decommissioning. While I do not dispute what appear to be necessary projects given the circumstances, it is unfortunate that this project was not more definitively defined years ago. At the same time, the Wilson Evidence does not dispute the prudence of the projects currently being undertaken to maintain the safe operation of the Mersey Hydro System (MHS), acknowledging that such work appears necessary given the circumstances. The concern expressed relates primarily to the fact that the future of the MHS was not "more definitively defined years ago." Notably, the Wilson Evidence does not make a specific recommendation to the Board regarding the Mersey Hydro project. It is important to distinguish the sustaining capital currently being undertaken from the uncertainty surrounding the long-term future of the MHS. NS Power's current sustaining capital investments are not driven by, nor contingent upon, whether the facilities are ultimately redeveloped or decommissioned. To be clear, continuing to invest in sustaining capital investment to support the continued operation of MHS assets in their current state, while deferring long-term investment, is the lowest-cost approach and provides the best value for customers at this time. Further, these expenditures are required to maintain the facilities in a safe and operable condition and would be incurred regardless of the eventual path forward. In other words, the Company would undertake its sustaining capital work in the same manner, regardless of whether redevelopment or decommissioning had already been selected. p. pp. 14-16
2.17 Mersey Hydro Update The Wilson Evidence expressed concern that NS Power "does not have a strong plan for protecting customers from excessive costs when dealing with the potential redevelopment or decommissioning of the Mersey Hydro pr...

AI summary The Wilson Evidence expresses concern that NS Power lacks a strong plan to protect customers from excessive costs related to the potential redevelopment or decommissioning of the Mersey Hydro project. NS Power is currently investing in sustaining capital to maintain safe operations while deferring long-term decisions. These investments are deemed necessary and are not contingent on the eventual path of the Mersey Hydro System.

3.0 CONCLUSION Consistent with prior ACE Plans, NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan reflects the Company's focus on providing customers with safe and reliable electrical service in the most cost-effective manner possible. NS Power appreciates the guidance from the NSEB and input from interested parties on the information provided in the ACE Plan. The 2026 ACE Plan is the product of collaborative engagement with stakeholders regarding the Company's capital investments. NS Power is confident that the responses provided in this Rebuttal Evidence address the matters raised in the Wilson Evidence, and provide the NSEB with the information required to endorse the capital projects and routines submitted for approval. NS Power respectfully requests that the Board approve the 2026 ACE Plan capital projects and routines, as well as the revised Summary CEJC, as filed. p. pp. 16-18
3.0 CONCLUSION Consistent with prior ACE Plans, NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan reflects the Company's focus on providing customers with safe and reliable electrical service in the most cost-effective manner possible. NS Power appreciates the gui...

AI summary NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan emphasizes cost-effective, reliable electrical service and reflects stakeholder collaboration. The company asserts that its Rebuttal Evidence addresses concerns raised in the Wilson Evidence and requests the Board's approval of the plan and revised CEJC.

N-13Letter of Comment 1 passage
Mr. Chair and Board Members:
Mr. Chair and Board Members: I'm writing this because, frankly, the math coming out of ns power financials just doesn't sit right with the people actually paying the bills. We've watched this utility's "Property, Plant, and Machinery" more...

AI summary The writer criticizes Nova Scotia Power's financial practices, highlighting the increase in property, plant, and machinery values and the growth of Emera's equity without new green power investments. They argue that the utility is using public money through debt and depreciation to generate returns that are ultimately paid by ratepayers.

N-14Opening Statement - SBA 1 passage
1 2 BEFORE THE NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
1 2 BEFORE THE NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 3 4 IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended 5 and - - 6 7 IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of its 2026 ANNUAL CAPITAL...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) emphasizes the need for careful evaluation of Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, especially in light of rising energy costs and environmental regulations. The SBA stresses the importance of ensuring that expenditures provide promised benefits and achieve cost savings.

N-15Opening Statement - CA 2 passages
M12619
M12619 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380 -and - IN THE MATTER OF: an application by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS POWER) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its ANNU...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate filed evidence in the proceeding regarding NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, highlighting cost minimization opportunities and issues with risk matrices and reliability projects. John Wilson of Grid Strategies provided recommendations on reporting requirements, contingency caps, and spare equipment inventory.

Section 2
1 Finally, Mr. Wilson provides additional recommendations concerning NS Power's proposed 2 updates to the CEJC, including development of a two-step process to better determine whether NS 3 Power may be proceeding with a sub-optimal alterna...

AI summary Mr. Wilson recommends updating NS Power's CEJC with a two-step process to evaluate project alternatives. NS Power has accepted two of 15 recommendations, while the remaining 13 are under consideration. The Consumer Advocate agrees with the Board's response to a letter from the Minister of Energy but notes it is not directly relevant to current proceedings.

N-16Opening Statement - DOE 5 passages
1 BEFORE THE
1 BEFORE THE 2 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 3 4 5 IN THE MATTER OF Section 35A of the Public Utilities Act, RSNS 1989, c 380, as amended 6 -and - 7 8 IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for Approval of...

AI summary This document is the opening statement in a proceeding before the Nova Scotia Energy Board regarding Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's application for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan). The proceeding is under Section 35A of the Public Utilities Act.

Preamble
- Please accept the following as the opening statement of the Department of Energy, - Government of Nova Scotia (the Department), for the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure - Plan (ACE Plan) hearing. The ACE Plan is intended to provide a comp...

AI summary The Department of Energy, Government of Nova Scotia, presents the opening statement for the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) hearing. It emphasizes public concern over NSPI's capital investments and highlights the transition of responsibilities to IESO-NS, an independent organization, to ensure competitive and prudent spending.

The Asset Inflation Strategy
The Asset Inflation Strategy - This ACE Plan continues a concerning capital trajectory, where capital expenditures have - grown from ~$126M during 2005–2008 to ~$700M for 2026–2030 (a 458% increase). - This growth has occurred across all a...

AI summary The ACE Plan shows a significant increase in capital expenditures from $126M (2005–2008) to $700M (2026–2030), with a CAGR of 10%. However, this investment has not led to proportional growth in energy supply or system resiliency, while NSPI's contribution to energy supply has decreased.

Project Management and Cost Overruns
Project Management and Cost Overruns - The ACE Plan yet again reveals a systemic lack of accountability regarding project - management. NSPI's attempt to limit the definition of a "Scope Change" appears designed - to reduce or avoid oversi...

AI summary The ACE Plan highlights a systemic lack of accountability in project management by NSPI, with efforts to limit the definition of 'Scope Change' to avoid oversight. Cost overruns have occurred, with increased spending on projects like Hydro plants and transportation vehicles raising concerns about ratepayer burden and reliability of original estimates.

Call for Regulatory Rigour and Accountability
Call for Regulatory Rigour and Accountability - The Department requests that the Board scrutinize the 2026 ACE Plan; seeing it not as a - collection of routine repairs, but rather recognizing it as potentially yet another round in - the sy...

AI summary The Department of Energy requests the Board to rigorously scrutinize the 2026 ACE Plan, questioning its potential to inflate asset purchases and urging the cancellation or deferral of expenditures without proper justification. It also calls for disallowing ratepayer funding for projects that would represent a 'double recovery' for system failures already covered by the utility.

N-17Opening Statement - NS Power 1 passage
Section 1
M12619 - 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan Opening Statement of Nova Scotia Power Incorporated Provided by Dave Pickles, Chief Operating Officer, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated Thank you, Chair and Members of the Board, for the opportun...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) proposes $702 million in capital spending, with a focus on improving reliability, safety, and preparing for the future. Investments include vegetation management, infrastructure upgrades, and storm hardening to reduce outages and enhance grid resilience.

N-18Capital Reports R8 - Refiled 3 passages
Section 1
NS Power 2025 Capital Spend Detail - As per ACE Routine Capital Reconciliation to 2025 ACE - as of December 31, 2025

AI summary The document outlines NS Power's 2025 capital spend detail as per the 2025 ACE (Annual Capital Expenditure) plan, including a routine capital reconciliation as of December 31, 2025.

This report includes an overview of routine expenditures showing actual 2025 spending compared to the 2025 ACE Plan.
This report includes an overview of routine expenditures showing actual 2025 spending compared to the 2025 ACE Plan. 2025 ACE Plan Variance Amount (2025) 2025 Spend Actual/ACE Generation Generation Equipment Replacements $5,317,515 $6,128,...

AI summary This report compares actual 2025 routine expenditures to the 2025 ACE Plan, highlighting variances in spending across various categories such as generation, transmission, distribution, and general plant. Some categories show overspending, while others show underspending relative to the plan.

Section 3
\ Any routine actual spending which exceeds the CEJC ATO thresholds will have ATO applications submitted to the NSEB in due course.

AI summary The text indicates that any routine actual spending exceeding the CEJC ATO thresholds will require ATO applications to be submitted to the NSEB.

N-22Responses to Undertakings 1-22 2 passages
Chris Milligan ([email protected]) p. p. 5
Chris Milligan ([email protected]) 1 Undertaking U-5: C0032382 Susie Lake Substation Addition Storm Hardening - Targeted Equipment Replacement and Upgrades Special Capital $ 5,149,415 $ 2,897,753 $ (2,251,662) 624,824 C0021140 2313...

AI summary The document outlines various capital projects undertaken by Nova Scotia Power, including substation additions, equipment replacements, and upgrades aimed at storm hardening. The table details project costs, funding, and financial figures for each initiative.

FOR PETROLEUM IMPACTED SITES IN ATLANTIC CANADA p. p. 173
FOR PETROLEUM IMPACTED SITES IN ATLANTIC CANADA Pha III E SA Rep ort, Se ctio n 5 .4 se S001 10645 POT - Routine Equipment Replacement 202,363 227,451 990,578 223,262 10673 TRE - Routine Equipment Replacement 523,902 385,427 464,408 322,17...

AI summary The document presents a detailed table with various entries related to routine equipment replacement, roofing, and heat rate routines for different sites, including costs and figures for multiple years. The data includes various entities and project codes, indicating ongoing maintenance and replacement activities.

100353Hearing Order 2 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT and – IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (ACE) PLAN for 2026 which totals $7...

AI summary This document outlines an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals approximately $702.1 million, with a requested approval of about $284.0 million.

HEARING ORDER
HEARING ORDER NS Power applied to the Nova Scotia Energy Board on December 12, 2025, for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for 2026 which totals $702.1 million. The Board orders that: - 1. The...

AI summary NS Power has applied for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan, totaling approximately $702.1 million, with a public hearing scheduled for April 2026. The Board has outlined a timetable for the proceeding, including dates for preliminary issues, formal intervention, and information requests.

100508Final Issues list 2 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. p. 0
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) for 2026 (M12619)

AI summary This document pertains to an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) for 2026 under the Public Utilities Act.

FINAL ISSUES LIST p. p. 0
FINAL ISSUES LIST The following issues will be dealt with in the public hearing on NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, scheduled to begin on April 21, 2026, in addition to the usual review of projects for which approval is sought (including the Rout...

AI summary The final issues list outlines key topics for the public hearing on NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, including reliability investments, capital spending criteria, cybersecurity breach impacts, and integration of IESO-NS work into NSPI's capital plans.

102430Board Order 3 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for Approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan BEFORE: Richard J. Melanson, LL.B., Panel Chair Steven M. Murphy,...

AI summary This document pertains to an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding is before a panel consisting of Richard J. Melanson, Steven M. Murphy, and Jennifer L. Nicholson.

ORDER
ORDER Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) filed an application for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan on December 12, 2025. The Board approves all the projects listed in the 2026 ACE Plan, except for CI C00801...

AI summary NS Power submitted its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which the Board approved in part. The project CI C0080111-2026 RTU Deployment was not approved and will be reconsidered after a report from Synapse Energy Consultants in Matter M12558. The approved projects total approximately $68.4 million, while routine capital expenditures amount to $207.3 million.

____________________________ Clerk of the Board
____________________________ Clerk of the Board SCHEDULE "A" 2026 ACE Plan Approved Projects CI Number Title 2026 Budget Project Total Generation C0080206 POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 $1,195,706 $1,304,600 C0080205 POA Boiler Refractory R...

AI summary This document outlines the 2026 ACE Plan Approved Projects, detailing various capital expenditure initiatives across Generation, Transmission, Distribution, and General Plant categories, including project titles, budgets, and totals.

103410Decision 38 passages
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for 2026 p. p. 4
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for 2026 BEFORE: Richard J. Melanson, LL.B., Panel Chair Steven M. Murphy, MBA, P.Eng., Member Jennifer L. Nicholson, CPA...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. has submitted an application for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for 2026. The proceeding involves various intervenors including the Consumer Advocate, Small Business Advocate, Department of Energy, Eastward Energy Incorporated, the Industrial Group, and the Nova Scotia Independent Energy System Operator.

Preamble p. pp. 4-89
- [1] Each year, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated files an Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlining its proposed capital expenditures for the upcoming year. In accordance with ss. 35, 35A and 35AA of the Public Utilities Act, RSNS 198...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated submitted its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for approval, seeking Board approval for projects totaling $76.7 million and Routine Capital Expenditures of $207.3 million. The Board approved the plan, except for the RTU Deployment project, which was deferred pending a Synapse Energy Economics Consultants report. The Board also addressed broader issues related to capital spending and reliability planning.

2.1 Content of the 2026 ACE Plan p. p. 5
2.1 Content of the 2026 ACE Plan - [6] The ACE Plan application presents NS Power's forecasted capital expenditure program for the year, detailing planned investments, project timelines and associated funding requirements. The ACE Plan inc...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines NS Power's capital expenditure program, including $76.7 million in requested approvals for 20 individual projects, with $49.0 million allocated for 2026 and the remainder for subsequent years. The plan includes descriptions of capital projects, routine expenses, and responses to previous directives.

2.1.1 Routine and Capital Work Order Applications p. pp. 5-6
2.1.1 Routine and Capital Work Order Applications [8] For each routine and capital work order application in the ACE Plan, NS Power provided detailed project descriptions, justification for the proposed investment and supporting cost estim...

AI summary NS Power submitted routine and capital work order applications under the ACE Plan, providing project descriptions, justifications, and cost estimates. The Board approved these projects, finding them necessary and prudent, and directed NS Power to update its 2026 ACE Plan with additional transmission line projects completed after the 2026 application.

2.2.2 C0021608 – TUC Shoreline Sheet Pile Refurbishment p. p. 7
2.2.2 C0021608 – TUC Shoreline Sheet Pile Refurbishment [13] This project involves the installation of an approximately 80-meter-long sloped rock revetment along the southwest shoreline of the Tufts Cove Generating Station (TUC). The proje...

AI summary The project involves installing an 80-meter sloped rock revetment and extending the seawater cooling intake at Tufts Cove Generating Station to replace a deteriorated steel sheet pile structure. NS Power evaluated multiple options and selected the rock revetment due to its higher score in design, operational impacts, regulatory considerations, and cost.

2.2.3 C0080135 – Burnside #2 Combustion Turbine (CT-BGT2) Engine Replacement p. pp. 7-12
2.2.3 C0080135 – Burnside #2 Combustion Turbine (CT-BGT2) Engine Replacement [23] CT-BGT2 is a 33 MW combustion turbine located in the Burnside Industrial Park in Dartmouth. It provides black start capability, 10-minute reserve, Volt-Amper...

AI summary The document discusses the need to replace the deteriorated engine of the Burnside #2 Combustion Turbine (CT-BGT2) in Nova Scotia. NS Power has proposed a capital project involving a full tear down and refurbishment of the turbine engine. The Board raised concerns about whether NS Power had thoroughly reviewed alternative options, such as purchasing a previously owned and refurbished engine.

2.3.1 Increase in Recent ACE Plans p. p. 18
2.3.1 Increase in Recent ACE Plans [39] NS Power requested approval of approximately $207.3 million for Routine Capital Expenditures in the 2026 ACE Plan. Reported routine capital expenditures declined from $230 million in 2022 to $153.3 m...

AI summary NS Power requested approval for $207.3 million in routine capital expenditures for the 2026 ACE Plan. Routine capital spending has increased from $153.3 million in 2023 to $176.4 million in 2024 and is forecast to reach $140 million in 2026, driven primarily by distribution upgrades and replacements.

2.3.1.1 Findings p. pp. 18-20
2.3.1.1 Findings [44] The Board accepts that an increase in expenditure does not, in itself, mean that an activity ceases to qualify as routine. Required expenditures may reasonably vary with asset conditions, customer growth, system requi...

AI summary The Board acknowledges that increased expenditure does not automatically disqualify an activity as routine but is concerned that temporary cost increases may become embedded in historical data, influencing future forecasts. NS Power is urged to clearly distinguish between structural and temporary cost drivers in future ACE Plans.

2.3.2.1.1 Findings p. pp. 21-24
2.3.2.1.1 Findings [55] The Board considers that NS Power's existing Work Management systems provide an opportunity to improve the assessment of Routine expenditures without creating an entirely new reporting system. The objective is not a...

AI summary The Board acknowledges NS Power's existing Work Management systems as a basis for improving Routine expenditure assessments without creating a new reporting system. The focus is on evaluating changes in routine capital spending, particularly in relation to labour, contractor rates, and productivity, to ensure transparency and efficiency.

2.3.3 Routines D005 and D055 p. pp. 24-25
2.3.3 Routines D005 and D055 [57] The interplay between D005 and D055 is particularly important. The annual expenditure for D005, representing reactive or unplanned replacement, remains elevated. At the same time, D055, intended to capture...

AI summary The document discusses the interplay between D005 and D055 routines, noting that D005's annual expenditure for reactive replacement remains high, while D055's planned replacement budget increased significantly in 2026. The Board questions whether NS Power has a coherent replacement strategy, as both categories are expanding without clear tradeoff articulation.

2.3.4 Basis of Schedule or Equivalent Process p. pp. 25-26
2.3.4 Basis of Schedule or Equivalent Process [61] Mr. Wilson recommended that NS Power adopt a Basis of Schedule, or an equivalent practice, for routine activities that can be planned in advance. Such a process is intended to identify lab...

AI summary Mr. Wilson recommended that NS Power adopt a Basis of Schedule or equivalent process for routine activities to reduce costs. NS Power disagreed, arguing that routine work is smaller and less complex, and does not require the same level of documentation. The CA clarified that an equivalent and proportionate practice could be used for planned routine work involving significant resources.

2.3.5 New Customer Routines p. p. 27
2.3.5 New Customer Routines [66] New customer routine capital expenditures represent the largest individual distribution routine subcategory with a budget of approximately $67.8 million in 2026. The 2026 budgets for D004 – New Customer Upg...

AI summary New customer routine capital expenditures are the largest distribution routine subcategory with a 2026 budget of $67.8 million. NS Power uses expenditure-based forecasts and notes that factors like customer demand and economic growth do not directly affect the forecast. Mr. Wilson recommended capturing more detailed data for better budgeting and forecasting, but NS Power argues that current methods are sufficient and performed well in 2025.

2.3.6 Spare Inventory Pooling p. pp. 28-29
2.3.6 Spare Inventory Pooling [74] Mr. Wilson examined whether spare inventory pooling could provide a more cost-effective alternative to NS Power independently maintaining certain high-value, longlead-time spare equipment. He recommended...

AI summary The document discusses spare inventory pooling as a potential cost-effective alternative to NS Power maintaining high-value, long-lead-time spare equipment. Mr. Wilson recommended obtaining detailed information on NS Power's existing inventory and suggested focusing on equipment with a minimum two-year holding period and a materiality threshold. NS Power, however, stated that previous investigations found existing arrangements less cost-effective and operationally reliable than its current strategy, citing concerns like availability, compatibility, and transportation.

2.3.7 Routine Program Evolution and Capital Envelopes p. p. 30
2.3.7 Routine Program Evolution and Capital Envelopes [77] The IG raised concerns with respect to what it characterized as "capital envelope filling." It relied on evidence that when an initially contemplated project cannot proceed, NS Pow...

AI summary The IG and DOE raised concerns about NS Power's capital envelope management, citing significant underspending on the 2025 ACE Plan and the reallocation of funds to other projects. NS Power defended its approach, emphasizing a risk-based, flexible capital planning process and noting that expenditures have varied relative to forecasts.

2.3.7.1 Findings p. pp. 30-31
2.3.7.1 Findings - [80] The Board accepts that a fixed capital ceiling is not an appropriate substitute for risk-based asset management, as a ceiling may not adequately address identified risks. The Board also accepts that sometimes it may...

AI summary The Board acknowledges that a fixed capital ceiling is not suitable for risk-based asset management and accepts that capital reallocation may be prudent under certain conditions. However, it emphasizes that capital reallocation and 'capital envelope' justification are distinct issues. The Board is also concerned about baseline ratcheting in the Routine Program and calls for more information to distinguish between permanent and temporary cost pressures.

2.4 Interested Party Review of the CEJC p. pp. 31-32
2.4 Interested Party Review of the CEJC [86] The IG recommended interested party review of the Routine Expenditure provisions of the CEJC, including consideration of a materiality threshold requiring enhanced justification where a Routine...

AI summary The IG recommended an interested party review of the Routine Expenditure provisions of the CEJC, including a materiality threshold for significant year-over-year growth. NS Power opposed a separate process, citing existing transparency and scrutiny through the annual ACE Plan, reporting requirements, and ATO processes.

3.0 CHANGES TO THE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE JUSTIFICATION CRITERIA p. pp. 33-34
3.0 CHANGES TO THE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE JUSTIFICATION CRITERIA [90] NS Power held an engagement session on October 29, 2025, in advance of filing the 2026 ACE Plan. The session reviewed NS Power's proposed changes to the CEJC. Changes were...

AI summary NS Power proposed changes to the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) to clarify when an ATO is required for sub-routines and their expenditure thresholds. Revisions were made to Appendix A, specifically for Transmission and Distribution Routines. These changes were supported by the CA and approved by the Board.

3.1.1.1 Sustaining Versus Transformative Investment p. p. 35
3.1.1.1 Sustaining Versus Transformative Investment [91] Section 15.1 of the CEJC provides that NS Power's Routine Program consists of recurring annual allocations for high-volume, repetitive, like-for-like capital replacements, enhancemen...

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) questions whether NS Power's Routine Program, which has increased in cost by approximately 70% over four years, still aligns with the definition of 'routine' capital expenditures as outlined in the CEJC. The IG argues that the growth is not solely due to inflation and new work categories but suggests a material scope expansion that may require more granular Board scrutiny.

[93] NS Power disagreed: p. p. 35
[93] NS Power disagreed: Respectfully, "like-for-like" is in reference to replacing assets with similar (like) assets that are in need of replacement or refurbishment, and does not indicate that the annual level of investment must remain s...

AI summary NS Power argues that 'like-for-like' replacements refer to substituting similar assets in need of replacement, not maintaining the same annual investment level. They also contend that the CEJC allows for enhancements and additions, and that recurring work does not classify as non-Routine work.

3.1.1.1.1 Findings p. pp. 35-36
3.1.1.1.1 Findings [95] The Board agrees that the CEJC is broader than strict physical like-for-like replacement. In particular, the express references to "improvements" and "enhancements" mean that some change in capability may properly o...

AI summary The Board acknowledges that the CEJC includes improvements and enhancements beyond strict physical replacement. It distinguishes between routine evolution and material transformation of programs. Exhibit N-1 shows that 45% of 2026 Routine Program spending is not like-for-like, indicating growth and performance improvements.

3.2 CEJC Scope Change Amendments and Recommendations p. pp. 36-37
3.2 CEJC Scope Change Amendments and Recommendations [99] Capital project Scope Change applications are currently addressed in Section 12.2 of NS Power's Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria. These are intended to address changes in...

AI summary The document discusses the need to amend the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) to better define 'Scope Change' in capital project applications. The Independent Governor (IG) raised concerns during the 2025 ACE Plan proceeding about the lack of clarity in the CEJC regarding what constitutes a Scope Change. The Board agreed and directed NS Power to consult with interested parties to propose amendments to the CEJC for inclusion in the 2026 ACE Plan.

3.2.1 Findings p. pp. 37-42
3.2.1 Findings [110] NS Power believes that its proposed definition for Scope Change provides an appropriate regulatory balance, recognizing that the ATO and FIN processes would capture project Scope Changes beyond those that would be incl...

AI summary NS Power argues that its proposed definition for Scope Change provides an appropriate regulatory balance, while the IG criticizes it for shifting oversight to after-the-fact financial reviews. NS Power notes that many ATO applications are filed after work has been completed, suggesting that a separate Scope Change process would not change this reality.

Storm Hardening with Targeted Equipment Replacements and Upgrades p. p. 47
Storm Hardening with Targeted Equipment Replacements and Upgrades [124] This involves replacing aging equipment, rebuilding lines, modernizing substations, strengthening transmission infrastructure and installing advanced protective device...

AI summary The text discusses storm hardening initiatives involving equipment replacements, line rebuilding, substation modernization, and installation of advanced protective devices to enhance grid resilience.

[126] NS Power forecasted the following spending over the five-year period in its original plan. This was again provided in the Company's 2026 update. p. p. 47
[126] NS Power forecasted the following spending over the five-year period in its original plan. This was again provided in the Company's 2026 update. Reliability Program 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 Total Plan Storm Hardening - Targeted Equip...

AI summary NS Power provided a five-year spending forecast for its reliability programs, including storm hardening, vegetation management, and grid modernization, with total projected spending of $1,259.3 million.

5.0 CAPITAL SPENDING GROWTH p. pp. 57-60
5.0 CAPITAL SPENDING GROWTH [163] All parties in this proceeding have concerns about NS Power's increase in capital spending over the last several years. Much of this concern was focused on the Five-Year Reliability Plan discussed earlier...

AI summary All parties are concerned about NS Power's increased capital spending, particularly the planned deployment of over half of the total investments made in the last 21 years within the next 60 months. The DOE highlights that this growth rate is significantly higher than provincial inflation and raises concerns about the fiscal capacity of ratepayers to absorb such spending.

6.1 Past Experience with Rate Impact Analysis p. p. 67
6.1 Past Experience with Rate Impact Analysis [175] In its Closing Submissions, the IG made the following request of the Board: The Industrial Group submits that the Board should direct NSPI to provide, with the Year 3 update to the Reliab...

AI summary The Industrial Group requested the Board to direct NSPI to provide a quantitative assessment of the Reliability Plan's impact on rates with the Year 3 update, and to consider the overall impact of the annual capital expenditure plan on ratepayer classes, including affordability analysis.

A Direction for Comprehensive Reporting Is Warranted p. p. 67
A Direction for Comprehensive Reporting Is Warranted The Industrial Group submits that the Board should direct NSPI to file, alongside each future ACE Plan, a ratepayer cost exposure reporting that includes: - NSPI's ACE capital program (a...

AI summary The Industrial Group (IG) urges the Board to require NSPI to provide detailed ratepayer cost exposure reporting in future ACE Plans, including capital program costs, reliability intertie costs, and IESO-NS-related expenses. NS Power argues that such analysis is not feasible due to uncertainties and complexities in estimating revenue requirements. The Board previously questioned the usefulness of this information and may reconsider based on recent developments and the Energy and Regulatory Boards Act.

6.4 NS Power's Position About Rate Affordability and Capital Projects p. pp. 69-70
6.4 NS Power's Position About Rate Affordability and Capital Projects [183] The concept of affordability has been raised in different ways, when addressing concerns about the significant costs of the Five-Year Reliability Plan, and the 202...

AI summary NS Power argues that affordability should be assessed within the GRA framework, emphasizing that capital expenditures are necessary and prudent if they align with performance standards and least cost principles. The Board acknowledges the need for flexibility in capital programs but warns against deferring maintenance, citing risks to rate impacts.

6.5 Need to Consider Rate Impacts and A Potential Framework p. pp. 70-71
6.5 Need to Consider Rate Impacts and A Potential Framework [187] The Board still has some concerns about the utility of a rate impact analysis, where the full set of studies and data available in a GRA are not readily reproduced on an ann...

AI summary The Board acknowledges concerns about the utility of rate impact analysis but emphasizes its importance in the context of increasing capital expenditures for decarbonization and reliability. It directs NS Power to provide a rate impact analysis for the 2027 ACE Plan, focusing on the impact of capital expenditures on rates for 2028-2030. The analysis should be done by rate class and include proposed ACE Plan capital expenditures, excluding the NB Intertie project.

7.1.1 Coordination with the IESO Nova Scotia p. p. 79
boration to support a transparent, efficient, and fair transition to an lESO-administered electricity system. [Emphasis in original] [Letter from the Office of the Minister of Energy, April 15, 2026] [203] The Board notes there were no pro...

AI summary The document discusses NS Power's updated Synchronous Condenser project with a $365 million cost, an increase from the original estimate due to a scope change involving nine condensers instead of four. This change was linked to additional planned wind farms beyond the Rate Based Procurement. The need for coordination between the IESO Nova Scotia, NS Power, and provincial policy directives was emphasized.

8.1 Impacts on Capital Planning p. p. 84
8.1 Impacts on Capital Planning [209] On April 25, 2025, NS Power discovered a cybersecurity breach which impacted certain parts of its information technology network resulting in an inability to access certain systems and data. The Board...

AI summary NS Power experienced a cybersecurity breach in April 2025, leading to delayed capital project filings and reliance on GIS databases for data gaps. The Board is reviewing the incident in two proceedings, with a specific focus on its impact on capital planning.

8.2 Cost Implications in 2026 ACE Plan p. p. 84
8.2 Cost Implications in 2026 ACE Plan [211] While a detailed review was undertaken though the IR process and in questioning at the oral hearing, no additional capital costs were identified in the 2026 ACE Plan that specifically related to...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan did not identify additional capital costs related to cybersecurity incident restoration. NS Power used a coding system to exclude such costs from the rate base. Cybersecurity restoration costs were covered by insurance or shareholders. Inflationary pressures may arise from deferred projects, which could be managed internally or through Board approval.

8.3 Considerations for Subsequent Submittal Items p. pp. 84-85
8.3 Considerations for Subsequent Submittal Items [212] There was discussion about IT or cybersecurity-related projects listed as subsequent submittal items in the 2026 ACE Plan. Two projects, in particular, raised several concerns. The Id...

AI summary The document discusses concerns raised about the increasing costs of IT and cybersecurity-related projects, specifically the Identity and Access Management and Customer Information System (CIS) Replacement projects. The Industrial Group recommends that future submittals include detailed cost explanations related to the 2025 cyber incident. NS Power argues that current processes already provide necessary information, but the Board agrees that specific references to the impact of the cyber incident on cost variances should be included in future submissions.

9.1 Findings p. pp. 87-88
9.1 Findings [219] The Board recognizes the broader concern raised by the CA: whether projects are being properly scoped and whether the associated risks used to estimate contingency are understood before a budget is submitted, in accordan...

AI summary The Board acknowledges concerns about proper project scoping and risk-based contingency estimation. It finds that fixed contingency rates do not ensure proper project definition and urges NS Power to align project scoping with budget-estimation classes and base contingency on identified risks.

10.0 MERSEY UPDATE p. pp. 88-89
10.0 MERSEY UPDATE [221] NS Power owns and operates the Mersey Hydro System (MHS), a series of six hydroelectric stations and a lake storage diversion along a 21 km reach of the Mersey River. The Mersey Hydro System Redevelopment Project (...

AI summary NS Power owns the Mersey Hydro System and is planning a redevelopment project over 20-30 years. The project was included in previous ACE Plans but was deferred until 2031 to evaluate alternatives and align with renewable energy goals and affordability considerations. The Board's 2025 ACE Plan Order provided specific directives related to the project.

10.1 Findings p. pp. 89-96
10.1 Findings [237] The Board accepts NS Power's Mersey Hydro System Update as filed with the 2026 ACE Plan application. [238] The Board directs NS Power to provide another comprehensive update on the Mersey Redevelopment Project in the 20...

AI summary The Board accepts NS Power's Mersey Hydro System Update as part of the 2026 ACE Plan application. It also directs NS Power to provide a comprehensive update on the Mersey Redevelopment Project in the 2027 ACE Plan, including capital sustaining costs, NPV analysis, and updates related to Mersey Hydro System modelling from the IESO's 2026 IRP.

11.0 CONCLUSION p. p. 96
11.0 CONCLUSION [239] The Board has approved NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, except for C0080111 – 2026 RTU Deployment. The approved projects are listed in the attached Schedule "A". [240] The Board has provided comments on specific capital proj...

AI summary The NSEB has approved NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, excluding one project, and provided comments on various aspects including capital projects, decarbonization targets, and reliability planning. The Board has issued directives for future ACE Plan submissions, including updates and detailed financial reporting requirements.

Jennifer L. Nicholson p. p. 96
Jennifer L. Nicholson SCHEDULE "A" 2026 ACE Plan Approved Projects CI Number Title 2026 Budget Project Total Generation C0080206 POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 $1,195,706 $1,304,600 C0080205 POA Boiler Refractory Replacement 2026 $936,645 $...

AI summary The document lists approved projects under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including boiler refurbishments, transmission upgrades, distribution right-of-way expansions, and intelligent asset data integration, with budget figures and total project costs.

103411Board Order 2 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for Approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan BEFORE: Richard J. Melanson, LL.B., Panel Chair Steven M. Murphy,...

AI summary This document outlines an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding is before a panel consisting of Richard J. Melanson, Steven M. Murphy, and Jennifer L. Nicholson.

ORDER
ORDER Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) filed an application for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan on December 12, 2025. The Board issued an Order on June 18, 2026, however, reserved the right to provide a...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) submitted its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which was partially approved by the Board. The Board deferred consideration of one project pending a final report and issued directives for future ACE Plan submissions, including updated appendices and detailed financial reporting requirements.

100295Letter NSPI re: 2026 ACE Plan 2 passages
Section 1 p. p. 0
December 12, 2025 Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Dear Ms. Henwood: Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's (NS Powe...

AI summary NS Power has submitted its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Application to the Nova Scotia Energy Board, requesting approval for various capital projects and routines. Certain information is sought to be held confidential, with a Confidentiality Matrix provided to justify such requests.

Section 2 p. p. 0
rk orders and their supporting documents is identified in the Confidentiality Matrix, and it includes justifications for the confidentiality being claimed. NS Power respectfully requests the NSEB: - 1. Establish a process for review of NS...

AI summary NS Power requests the NSEB to approve a 2026 ACE Plan, including capital items and routine programs, and to accept amendments to CEJC versions. They also seek approval for confidential treatment of certain information.

100296Confidential Undertaking 2 passages
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is considering an application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan under the Public Utilities Act.

Section 3
- 1. NS Power will provide Designated Confidential Information, as defined herein, to the Designated Recipient as defined in the undertaking to which this schedule is attached. - 2. Designated Confidential Information shall consist of mate...

AI summary NS Power outlines the types of information designated as confidential in its 2026 ACE Plan filing, including engineering studies, commercial quotations, and proprietary third-party information, which are confirmed as confidential by the Nova Scotia Energy Board.

100352Board letter re: Confidential Undertaking 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
December 18, 2025 [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) Michael Willett Director, Regulatory Finance Nova Scotia Power Inc. PO Box 910 Halifax, NS B3J 2W5 Dear Mr. Willett: M12619 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. – 2026 A...

AI summary The Board panel has approved the confidential treatment of information in Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) application, as requested by NS Power, in accordance with the Board's Regulatory Rules.

100353Hearing Order 2 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT and – IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (ACE) PLAN for 2026 which totals $7...

AI summary NS Power has applied for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals approximately $702.1 million, with a request for about $284.0 million in approval.

HEARING ORDER
HEARING ORDER NS Power applied to the Nova Scotia Energy Board on December 12, 2025, for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for 2026 which totals $702.1 million. The Board orders that: - 1. The...

AI summary NS Power has applied for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan totaling approximately $702.1 million. The Nova Scotia Energy Board has scheduled a public hearing for April 21-22, 2026, and established a timetable for the proceeding, including preliminary issues, notices of formal intervention, and information requests.

100354Notice of Public Hearing 1 passage
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING p. p. 0
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING _____________________________________________________________________________ NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) has made an application to the Board for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its ANNUA...

AI summary NS Power has applied for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, totaling $702.1 million, with a request for $284.0 million. A public hearing is scheduled for April 21, 2026, with details provided for participation and submission of comments.

100355Preliminary Issues List 2 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. p. 0
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) for 2026 (M12619)

AI summary This proceeding concerns Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's application for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) for 2026 under the Public Utilities Act.

PRELIMINARY ISSUES LIST p. p. 0
PRELIMINARY ISSUES LIST The following issues will be dealt with in the public hearing on NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, scheduled to begin on April 21, 2026, in addition to the usual review of projects for which approval is sought (including th...

AI summary The preliminary issues list outlines topics to be addressed during the public hearing on NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, including reliability investments, capital spending criteria, and updates to various reports and projects.

100361Notice of Intervention - DOE 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act , RSNS 1989, c 380 as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF: An application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Ann...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is considering NS Power's application for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals $701.2 million and includes a requested approval of approximately $284.0 million.

100379Notice if Intervention - IG 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of approximately $283.0 Million of its...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is considering an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals $702.1 million and requests approval for approximately $283.0 million.

100381Notice of Intervention - SBA 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act - and - IN THE MATTER OF: An application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE)...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is considering an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals approximately $702.1 million.

100437Notice of Intervention - NSIESO 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD p. p. 1
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF: An application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Pl...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is considering an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for 2026, which totals $702.1 million.

100465Issues list comments - IG 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
File Reference: SM002557.00245 Nancy G. Rubin, K.C. January 5, 2026 Direct Dial: 902.420.3337 [email protected] Brianne E. Rudderham Direct Dial: 902.420.3323 [email protected] Via Electronic Mail Crystal Henwood Regu...

AI summary The Industrial Group is seeking clarification from the Nova Scotia Energy Board regarding whether the impact of a cybersecurity breach on NSPI's capital planning and the integration of IESO-NS work into NSPI's capital plans are already addressed in the Preliminary Issues List for the 2026 ACE Plan, or if they should be added.

100468Notice of Intervention - PHP 1 passage
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act , R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380 as amended – and – IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual Ca...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated has applied for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, seeking authorization for approximately $284.0 million out of a total plan value of $702.1 million, under the Public Utilities Act.

100481Participant List 1 passage
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT -and- IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (ACE) PLAN for 2026 which totals $7...

AI summary The document outlines an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals $702.1 million, with a request for approximately $284.0 million in approval.

100493Letter SBA re: Preliminary Issues List 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
January 6, 2026 VIA EMAIL Ms. Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: Ml2619 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (A...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate supports the additions to the Preliminary Issues List for Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan), as indicated in Ms. Rubin's letter.

100508Final Issues list 2 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. p. 0
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) for 2026 (M12619)

AI summary This document pertains to an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) for 2026 under the Public Utilities Act.

FINAL ISSUES LIST p. p. 0
FINAL ISSUES LIST The following issues will be dealt with in the public hearing on NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, scheduled to begin on April 21, 2026, in addition to the usual review of projects for which approval is sought (including the Rout...

AI summary The Final Issues List outlines key topics to be addressed during the public hearing on NS Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including reliability investments, capital spending criteria, cybersecurity breach impacts, and integration of IESO-NS work into NSPI's capital plans.

100690NSEB (NSPI) IR 1 to 202 - PDF 88 passages
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF: IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for Approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan - $284 million

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. has applied for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which includes $284 million in capital spending. The application is being considered under the Public Utilities Act.

Request IR-2:
Request IR-2: - Figure 1 Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) Total Capital Investment: Historical, Budget and Forecast. - a) In the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE Plan) M12012, Figure 1 in the application shows a total expected capital expe...

AI summary The document requests explanations regarding changes in Nova Scotia Power's capital expenditure forecasts, including reasons for a decrease in expected spending, constraints applied, and implications of external funding assumptions. It also asks for clarification on whether the capital investment trajectory would remain unchanged if external funding is delayed or reduced.

Request IR-3:
Request IR-3: - In reference to Figure 2 Total Annual Capital Expenditures by Function, on page 15. - a) Please describe the reasons for the significant increase in forecast generation spending in 2027 to 2029 compared to compared to the 2...

AI summary Request IR-3 asks for explanations regarding changes in capital expenditures in various categories between 2026 and 2029, including the classification of synchronous condensers and energy storage, and a request for an Excel version of Figure 2.

Request IR-4:
Request IR-4: - Figure 2: Total Annual Capital Expenditures by Function on page 15 budget for 2026 is lower for - Generation and Transmission but higher for Distribution and General Plant in comparison to - Figure 2 Total Annual Capital Ex...

AI summary The document requests a discussion on changes in the 2026 budget for Generation and Transmission compared to the 2025 ACE Plan, specifically highlighting reductions and potential project changes driving these changes.

Request IR-5:
Request IR-5: - Figures 3 and 4 Breakdown of Capital Forecast by Investment Type on pages 16 and 17. - a) The 2025 ACE Plan application included capital spending in 2026 to 2029 for the NS-NB reliability tie. Please explain why this spendi...

AI summary Request IR-5 seeks clarification on capital spending forecasts in the 2026 ACE Plan, including changes in the NS-NB reliability tie project, coal fleet spending, and regulatory/compliance spending reductions.

Request IR-6:
Request IR-6: - Figure 4: Breakdown of Capital Forecast by Investment Type on page 17 presents the budget estimates for investment in the Eastern Clean Energy Initiative (ECEI) – Synchronous Condenser for 2026 to 2029. The values presented...

AI summary Request IR-6 seeks clarification on capital spending for the ECEI Synchronous Condenser project, including changes in estimated costs, spending in 2025, and the rationale for extending the project timeline from 2027 to 2029.

Request IR-7:
Request IR-7: - a) Please identify, within the 2026 ACE spending forecast, all projects related to Information Technology (IT). For each IT project, please specify whether the project represents a natural lifecycle replacement or upgrade,...

AI summary Request IR-7 asks for the identification of IT projects in the 2026 ACE spending forecast, specifying whether they are lifecycle replacements or upgrades, and whether they were initiated due to a cybersecurity incident. It also requests clarification on the scope of cybersecurity-related projects.

Request IR-8:
Request IR-8: - Section 4.2 2025 ACE Plan Capital Items Deferred/Cancelled, please identify those projects that were deferred or cancelled with a criticality rating of 16 or higher. - a) For those projects with a criticality rate of 16 or...

AI summary Request IR-8 asks Nova Scotia Power (NSP) to identify and explain the status of capital projects deferred or cancelled in the 2025 ACE Plan with criticality ratings of 16 or higher, including budget impacts and mitigation measures.

Request IR-9:
Request IR-9: - In reference to Figure 7 Subsequent Submittal Project Status Update, pages 28-29. The Susie Lake Substation Addition project was included in the 2023 ACE Plan as a subsequent submittal item with a total estimated cost of $6...

AI summary The Susie Lake Substation Addition project's estimated costs have fluctuated significantly across the 2023, 2024, 2025, and 2026 ACE Plans, with the project being deferred in 2026 due to the need for additional engineering. The request asks for an explanation of the delay in completing engineering and the reasons for the cost decrease between the 2025 and 2026 plans.

Request IR-10:
Request IR-10: - In reference to Figure 10 2026 Capital Items Forecast for Subsequent Submittal, pages 34-38. - a) To what AACE Class level have the cost estimates been developed for the 2026 Capital Items Forecast for Subsequent Submittal...

AI summary Request IR-10 seeks clarification on capital item forecasts, contingency levels, and cost estimates for specific projects, including comparisons to previous estimates and the purpose of project phases.

Section 5.0 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan pages 31 to 39
Section 5.0 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan pages 31 to 39

AI summary This section outlines the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for Nova Scotia Power, detailing proposed capital investments and expenditures for the year. It covers various infrastructure and operational initiatives aimed at supporting the company's long-term growth and service reliability.

Request IR-11:
Request IR-11: - Figure 12: Historical Number of Projects Less Than $1M indicates that there are 330 steam - projects in 2026. Please identify the number of projects for each individual steam generation facility. - a) In reference to Appen...

AI summary The document requests clarification on the categorization of multiple small-scale capital projects related to steam generation facilities, including Trenton 5, TUC3, and Lingan 2, and why they are listed as separate projects rather than consolidated efforts.

Request IR-12:
Request IR-12: - Please identify all projects with estimated total project costs of less than $1M in the 2026 ACE - plan that relate to steam or other thermal generation assets. - a) For each project identified, please confirm whether the...

AI summary Request IR-12 asks for identification of projects under the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) plan with costs under $1M related to steam or thermal generation assets, and whether these assets will be retired, decommissioned, or underutilized by 2030.

Request IR-13:
Request IR-13: - Does NS Power apply any internal aggregate cap or approval threshold to the total annual - spending on projects with estimated total project costs of less than $1M?

AI summary The document asks whether Nova Scotia Power applies any internal aggregate cap or approval threshold to the total annual spending on projects with estimated total project costs of less than $1M.

Request IR-14:
Request IR-14: - Board staff note that over the five-year period 2022-2026, NS Power's cumulative budgeted - capital expenditure on generation projects with estimated total project costs of less than $1M total - approximately $295M, of whi...

AI summary The document requests NS Power to provide actual spend data for capital expenditures under $1M from 2020 to 2025, explain consistency with the 2030 plan, and classify these expenditures as life extension, minimum safe operation, or regulatory/safety requirements.

Request IR-16:
Request IR-16: - Figure 17: Generation Carry-over Capital Spending Summary. Have there been any changes to the Final Date for any of the projects listed in Figure 17 since the 2026 ACE Plan has been filed? - a) Please identify each of thes...

AI summary The document contains a series of questions regarding capital spending on various projects listed in Figure 17, including inquiries about changes to final dates, spending overages, project status updates, and reasons for the absence of subsequent spending for certain projects.

Request IR-17:
Request IR-17: - Please provide a copy of NS Power's 2026 Hydro Interval Plan. - a) Please explain the reasons for any significant changes between the 2025 and 2026 Hydro Interval Plan. - b) Has NS Power completed any updates to its 2018 H...

AI summary Request IR-17 seeks information from NS Power regarding its 2026 Hydro Interval Plan, changes from the 2025 plan, updates to the 2018 Hydro Asset Study, and a table of planned capital work on hydro generation assets in 2026 and beyond.

Section 7.0 Transmission pages 46 to 50
Section 7.0 Transmission pages 46 to 50

AI summary The section discusses transmission-related matters, including capital expenditures, infrastructure planning, and regulatory oversight. It touches on the role of Nova Scotia Power and the need for compliance with regulatory processes and standards.

Request IR-19:
Request IR-19: - On page 48 of the application, NS Power states: "The focus for transmission capital investments - in 2026 is on sustaining and improving system reliability and transformational investment in - Energy Storage and Synchronou...

AI summary The document requests clarification on the expected improvements in performance standards metrics from the 2026 ACE Plan T&D projects, specifically how these projects will impact system reliability and the expected net positive impact on each metric.

Request IR-20:
Request IR-20: - Figure 22: Transmission Carry-over Capital Spending Summary. Have there been changes to the - Final Date for any of the projects listed since the ACE Plan has been filed? - a) Please identify each of these carry-over proje...

AI summary The text requests clarification on transmission carry-over capital spending, including projects exceeding approved amounts, negative spending for a specific energy storage project, and subsequent spending for projects with final dates in 2026.

Request IR-21:
Request IR-21: - For the following carry-over projects, please provide an explanation for the increase in total project expenditure from prior submissions/fillings and the 2026 ACE application: - C0021140 138KV-25KV Substation Stellarton....

AI summary Request IR-21 asks for explanations regarding increased expenditures for three carry-over projects compared to prior submissions and the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) application.

Section 8.0 Distribution pages 51 to 54
Section 8.0 Distribution pages 51 to 54 - Request IR-23: - Figure 27: Distribution Carry-over Capital Spending Summary. Have there been changes to the - Final Date for any of the projects listed since the ACE Plan has been filed? - a) Plea...

AI summary The text requests information on changes to carry-over capital spending projects since the ACE Plan was filed, specifically identifying projects that exceed the Board approved amount by the ATO threshold and the related dollar amounts.

Request IR-24:
Request IR-24: Please explain why the following projects list subsequent spending given that their final dates are in 2026: C0068954 2025 PCB Downline Device Sampling and Replacement; C0071954 87W-312 - Dauphiness Mill Lake Rebuild; 52184...

AI summary The text contains several requests (IR-24 to IR-29) directed at explaining discrepancies in project spending, increases in expenditure, and changes to project timelines and budgets, particularly in relation to the 2025 and 2026 ACE Plans and General Plant Investment forecasts.

Request IR-30:
Request IR-30: - Section 10.1 of the 2026 ACE Plan shows that annual routine capital expenditure remains high. - a) Please explain why routine capital expenditures continue to increase or remain elevated notwithstanding the characterizatio...

AI summary Section 10.1 of the 2026 ACE Plan highlights elevated annual routine capital expenditures, prompting questions about the reasons for the increase and whether efficiency gains have been realized in the execution of such work.

Request IR-31:
Request IR-31: - D005 Unplanned Replacement Deteriorated Equipment - Board staff note that routine capital expenditures have been persistently high, with a planned - increase of approximately 18% ($3.3M) in the 2026 ACE Plan. In NS Power's...

AI summary The document requests detailed information on unplanned replacement costs due to deteriorated equipment and routine capital expenditures. It highlights increased capital spending linked to asset failures and asks for data on outages, cost breakdowns, and explanations for budget variances.

Request IR-32:
Request IR-32: - D006 Regulatory Replacements Province - Board staff notes that a 104% increase ($2.2M) is contemplated for this routine. - a) Please provide a detailed explanation for the drivers of this increase. b) Please also explain w...

AI summary The document requests an explanation for a 104% increase in the D006 Regulatory Replacements Province routine, amounting to $2.2M, and also inquires why D006 was under budget in 2025.

Request IR-33:
Request IR-33: - D055 Planned Replacement of Distribution Equipment - a) This routine is set to increase by $5.6M in 2026. Please provide a detailed explanation of the drivers of this increase. - b) For each year from 2022–2025, please pro...

AI summary Request IR-33 seeks detailed information about the D055 routine, including the reasons for a $5.6M increase in 2026, budget vs. actual expenditures from 2022–2025, cost category breakdown for 2026, whether the routine includes new or upgraded devices, average asset age and useful life, and the rationale for using historical data rather than a forward-looking approach.

Request IR-34:
Request IR-34: - D004 New Customers - a) Please provide the calculations used to derive the 2026 ACE Plan budget figures for routine D004 "New Customer Upgrades", routine D061 "New Customers – Residential", and routine D062 "New Customers...

AI summary The document requests detailed calculations and cost breakdowns related to the 2026 ACE Plan budget for new customer upgrades and expenditures in 2025, categorized by project type and including new customer connections, renovations, and load growth-driven projects.

Request IR-36:
Request IR-36: - P062 work vehicles - a) Please provide, for each year from 2022 to 2026, the following information for P062: the total fleet size at year-end, the number of vehicles replaced annually, and the number of vehicles retired an...

AI summary Request IR-36 seeks detailed information on P062 work vehicles, including fleet size, replacement and retirement numbers, salvage values, differences between replacement and retirement, average age and usage at replacement, and assumptions about vehicle useful life from 2022 to 2026.

Request IR-37:
Request IR-37: - a) Please identify which components of P031 relate to routine lifecycle replacement or refresh, cybersecurity risk mitigation or enhancement, and remediation or recovery activities associated with the cybersecurity inciden...

AI summary Request IR-37 asks for an analysis of P031, focusing on components related to routine lifecycle replacement, cybersecurity risk mitigation, and remediation activities, as well as new costs in 2026 and reasons for underspending in 2025.

Request IR-38:
Request IR-38: - Distribution routines: - a) Please explain how the forecasting methodologies illustrated in Figure 42 avoid reliance on historical spending levels as a proxy for future need and instead demonstrate independent evidence of...

AI summary Request IR-38 seeks clarification on NS Power's forecasting methodologies for distribution routines, including their reliance on historical data, efficiency gains, external benchmarks, and the rationale for new routines, as well as the development of forecast volumes and costs.

Request IR-39:
Request IR-39: - D061 and D062 New Customers - a) Please update the attachment provided in M12319 Board IR-7 to include 2025 actual expenditures and the forecast for 2026. - b) Please provide the following for each year from 2022 to 2025:...

AI summary Request IR-39 seeks detailed updates on customer additions, infrastructure installations, and capital cost funding for D061, D062, and D004. It also requests an explanation of the 2026 forecast methodology and the reasons for D061 being under budget in 2025.

Directives & Misc pages 87 to 141
Directives & Misc pages 87 to 141 Section 11.1.2 Annual Rating/Prioritization of Capital Projects pages 88 to 90

AI summary This section outlines the process for the annual rating and prioritization of capital projects, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively based on strategic objectives and operational needs.

Section 11.1.3 2026 to 2030 Forecast ACE Plan Expenditures by Functional Class and
Section 11.1.3 2026 to 2030 Forecast ACE Plan Expenditures by Functional Class and

AI summary This section outlines the forecasted Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan expenditures from 2026 to 2030, categorized by functional class. It provides a detailed breakdown of projected spending across various sectors and initiatives.

Spending Program pages 90 to 91
Spending Program pages 90 to 91

AI summary The document discusses the Spending Program, focusing on capital expenditures and funding mechanisms related to energy efficiency and demand-side management initiatives. It outlines the role of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) in shaping energy programs.

Request IR-42:
Request IR-42: - In reference to Figure 57, please discuss the changes made to the 2026 ACE Plan that are - different from the forecast provided in the 2025 ACE Plan M12012 Figure 59 on page 91, - specifically the change in forecast spendi...

AI summary The text requests a discussion on changes in the 2026 ACE Plan compared to the 2025 ACE Plan, focusing on expenditures for combustion turbines in 2029 and hydro generation in 2028, referencing specific figures and forecasts.

Request IR-51:
Request IR-51: - For each project that NS Power seeks Board approval as part of the 2025 ACE Plan (excluding - the Transmission Replacements and Upgrades projects), and which do not contain any "Cost - Support Reference" or "Completed Simi...

AI summary The document requests Nova Scotia Power (NSP) to provide the specific basis for line-item cost estimates for 'Materials', 'Contracts', and 'Consulting' for projects in the 2025 ACE Plan, excluding Transmission Replacements and Upgrades projects that lack 'Cost Support Reference' or 'Completed Similar Projects' in their detailed estimates.

Request IR-59:
Request IR-59: - NS Power's 2025 ACE Plan filing (Matter M12012) identified Work Order C0021835 IT – - Customer Information System Customer Information System (CIS) Replacement, which is - included in the 2026 ACE Plan as a project for sub...

AI summary The document requests detailed information on NS Power's CIS Replacement project, including spending to date, progress updates, and a Gantt chart with risk factors, as part of the 2025 ACE Plan filing and its inclusion in the 2026 ACE Plan.

INDIVIDUAL CAPITAL INVESTMENTS
INDIVIDUAL CAPITAL INVESTMENTS - Generation Capital Investments - G01: C0080206 POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 - Request IR-60: - What is the current forecasted retirement date for the Point Aconi Generating Facility? - a) Please identify t...

AI summary The document discusses individual capital investments, focusing on the refurbishment of the Point Aconi Generating Facility and related inquiries about its operational life and alternative strategies to extend its operation without the proposed capital project.

Request IR-61:
Request IR-61: - a) Please identify the specific deficiencies that necessitated the proposed boiler refurbishment in 2026, including the measured condition indicators. - b) The application indicates that the final scope will be determined...

AI summary Request IR-61 seeks detailed information on the proposed boiler refurbishment at Point Aconi, including deficiencies, scope assumptions, capacity factors, lead times for parts delivery, and contingency planning for parts not in inventory.

Request IR-63:
Request IR-63: - Please provide a copy of the Point Aconi "Boiler Tube Repair Thermal Maintenance Practice - (TMP-004)", as identified in the 2022 ACE Plan. - a) Please confirm that the proposed capital project meets the requirements of th...

AI summary Request IR-63 seeks a copy of the Point Aconi 'Boiler Tube Repair Thermal Maintenance Practice (TMP-004)' from the 2022 ACE Plan and asks for confirmation that the proposed capital project complies with the practice, particularly regarding the replacement of boiler tubes only when they reach 50% of the original wall thickness.

G02: C0080205 POA Boiler Refractory Replacement 2026
G02: C0080205 POA Boiler Refractory Replacement 2026

AI summary The document pertains to the POA Boiler Refractory Replacement project for 2026, focusing on the replacement of refractory materials in a boiler system. This initiative is likely related to maintenance and upgrade efforts to ensure operational efficiency and safety.

Request IR-65:
Request IR-65: - Please describe any work NS Power has undertaken to assess opportunities to continue - operation of the Point Aconi Generating Facility without requiring the need for the proposed capital - project in advance of facility r...

AI summary The request asks NS Power to describe any work undertaken to assess opportunities for continuing the operation of the Point Aconi Generating Facility without the proposed capital project, ahead of its retirement.

Request IR-69:
Request IR-69: - Page 153, under Description NS Power states: "This work is to mitigate the deteriorated condition of the existing steel sheet pile structures that retain the plant shoreline." Under the heading Why do this project? NS Powe...

AI summary NS Power is requesting an analysis of the net present value and cost-benefit ratio for mitigating corroded steel sheet pile structures at a plant shoreline, including options for new retaining walls and encapsulation. The request also asks for an Economic Assessment Model (EAM) in Excel format and a Net Present Value analysis of the proposed solutions.

Request IR-71:
Request IR-71: - Page 154 states: "The detailed design was used as the basis of the construction Request for - Proposals (RFP) which is currently in the process of being awarded in late 2025." - a) Has the construction RFP been awarded? -...

AI summary The text references a construction RFP based on detailed design, currently in the process of being awarded in late 2025. It asks whether the RFP has been awarded, and if not, the reasons and expected timeline for awarding it.

Request IR-72:
Request IR-72: - The capital application states: "Discussions with regulatory authorities regarding permitting - requirements have been initiated. These permitting considerations are a key factor influencing - the timing of the work, and e...

AI summary The text discusses the status of discussions with regulatory authorities regarding permitting requirements for a capital application by NS Power and inquires about the current permit status and expected timelines for project construction.

Request IR-85:
Request IR-85: - Was cropping of the existing blades considered as an alternative to blade replacement? - a) If not, why not? - b) If so, please explain why this was not considered to be a feasible or cost-effective alternative to the prop...

AI summary The document presents a regulatory inquiry regarding the consideration of blade cropping as an alternative to blade replacement for a proposed project, seeking explanations on why this alternative may not have been feasible or cost-effective.

Request IR-86:
Request IR-86: - In reference to Capital Project Detailed Estimate - a) How long will this project take to complete? - b) Why is the labour for Maintenance Trades Regular Labour the same amount as Overtime Labour? - c) Why has a budget for...

AI summary Request IR-86 includes several questions regarding the Capital Project Detailed Estimate, including project duration, labor cost allocation, budgeting for overtime meals, and office trailer rental details.

G05: C0080134 TUC2 Stack Coating and Structural Refurbishment
G05: C0080134 TUC2 Stack Coating and Structural Refurbishment - Request IR-88: - Under the heading Why do this project , NS Power indicates that the inspection report found "the - freeze-thaw cycling as the dominant root cause of the crack...

AI summary NS Power is requesting information on whether the new two-coat epoxy system will provide greater resistance to freeze-thaw cycling compared to the existing coating, based on an inspection report that identified freeze-thaw cycling as the primary cause of cracking.

Request IR-89:
Request IR-89: - In reference to the contingency of 20% relating to contractor costs due to adverse weather. How - much does the 20% cover for contract costs in terms of work-days lost and the added expense of - equipment rental resulting...

AI summary The document asks about the 20% contingency for contractor costs related to adverse weather, specifically how it covers work-days lost and additional equipment rental expenses due to delays from high winds, rain, and humidity.

Request IR-90:
Request IR-90: - In reference to Capital Project Detailed Estimate - a) Please explain why an electrician is required for regular labour. - b) Do these estimates include items that the contractor has not included and items that NS Power is...

AI summary The document contains two questions related to a capital project detailed estimate. The first asks why an electrician is needed for regular labour, while the second inquires whether the estimates include items not included by the contractor and items required by NS Power as specified in the contractor's quote.

G06: C0080133 TUC3 IP Turbine Refurbishment
G06: C0080133 TUC3 IP Turbine Refurbishment

AI summary The document discusses the TUC3 IP Turbine Refurbishment under the G06: C0080133 matter, likely involving capital expenditures and infrastructure planning related to turbine refurbishment.

Request IR-92:
Request IR-92: - Did NS Power determine the need for replacement based on operating hours alone or has a visual - inspection been carried out as well? - a) If a visual inspection, such as a borescope inspection, has not been performed, why...

AI summary The document contains questions regarding NS Power's methodology for determining the need for equipment replacement, specifically whether visual inspections were conducted and the adequacy of a 15% contingency, as well as whether previous project experience included a specific engine refurbishment project.

a) If not confirmed, please explain.
a) If not confirmed, please explain. G07: C0068888 TUC3 Continuous Ash Hauling System Request IR-96: The application considers that this investment will reduce operational costs. - a) What are the annual forecasted costs of NS Power to per...

AI summary The document contains multiple requests for information regarding the Continuous Ash Hauling System and Engine Refurbishment projects. It asks about costs, maintenance schedules, TCO analysis, and the reasons for selecting specific systems and contractors. It also inquires about the operating history of a turbine unit and the OEM's recommendations for refurbishment.

Request IR-102:
Request IR-102: - Page 325 states: "New FT4 engine designs are no longer being produced and the only other - option available would have been to purchase a previously owned and refurbished engine. Based - on the asset condition of the exis...

AI summary The document requests an analysis and data to support the claim that refurbishing the existing P686632 engine is more cost-effective than purchasing a previously owned and refurbished FT4 engine, given the unavailability of new FT4 engines and the asset condition of the existing engine.

Request IR-103:
Request IR-103: - Please describe any work NS Power has undertaken to assess opportunities to continue - operation of the Engine without requiring the need for the proposed capital project in advance of - completion of the IESO Nova Scotia...

AI summary The document requests NS Power to describe any efforts made to assess the possibility of continuing the operation of the Engine without the need for a proposed capital project, prior to the completion of the IESO Nova Scotia's 300W combustion turbine facility.

Request IR-104:
Request IR-104: - Are materials being sourced from the US? - a) If so, why is NS Power not using a Canadian supplier? - b) If not, why did NS Power include a line item for converting from USD to CAD in the Capital Project Detailed Estimate...

AI summary The text raises questions regarding NS Power's sourcing practices and the inclusion of a USD to CAD conversion line item in a capital project estimate, specifically inquiring about the use of US materials and the 40% application rate.

Request IR-105:
Request IR-105: Please provide the budgeted and actual annual capital cost associated with the CT-BGT2 unit over the past five years.

AI summary The document requests the budgeted and actual annual capital costs for the CT-BGT2 unit over the past five years.

Request IR-106:
Request IR-106: Please provide the forecast annual sustaining capital cost associated with the CT-BGT2 unit for each year from 2026 up to and including 2030.

AI summary The document requests the forecast annual sustaining capital cost for the CT-BGT2 unit from 2026 to 2030, focusing on financial planning and infrastructure management.

Request IR-107:
Request IR-107: - Please provide the budgeted and actual annual operations and maintenance cost associated with - the CT-BGT2 unit over the past five years.

AI summary The document requests the budgeted and actual annual operations and maintenance costs for the CT-BGT2 unit over the past five years.

Transmission Capital Investments
Transmission Capital Investments

AI summary The section titled 'Transmission Capital Investments' introduces the topic of capital expenditures related to transmission infrastructure. It likely discusses the need for investment in transmission systems, associated costs, and potential impacts on the electricity grid.

T01: C0080110 L7012 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1
T01: C0080110 L7012 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1

AI summary The document outlines Phase 1 of replacements and upgrades for the L7012 project, likely related to infrastructure or equipment at the Burnside Unit #2 (BGT2) facility. Specific details are not provided in the text, but the context suggests it involves capital expenditures and operational improvements.

Request IR-115:
Request IR-115: - With regards to the project's detailed cost estimate on page 3 of 5: Please identify the estimated - unit materials and contract costs for wood poles, insulators and O/H conductors, and compare - these unit costs to those...

AI summary The request pertains to identifying and comparing unit material and contract costs for wood poles, insulators, and overhead conductors in the project's detailed cost estimate with those used in the 2025 ACE Plan application.

Request IR-118:
Request IR-118: Please provide cost support references from similar projects recently completed and update the detailed project estimates for each project.

AI summary The request asks for cost support references from similar recently completed projects and updated detailed project estimates for each project.

Request IR-119:
Request IR-119: - Please provide specific details on the criteria used and the work completed to estimate which - assets require replacement.

AI summary The request seeks specific details on the criteria used and the work completed to estimate which assets require replacement.

Request IR-122:
Request IR-122: - With regards to the project's detailed cost estimate on page 3 of 5: Please identify the estimated - unit materials and contract costs for wood poles, insulators and O/H conductors, and compare - these unit costs to those...

AI summary The request asks for a comparison of unit material and contract costs for wood poles, insulators, and overhead conductors from the current project's detailed cost estimate to those used in the 2025 ACE Plan application.

Request IR-133:
Request IR-133: - Please provide a status and cost update of C0061521 New Distribution Rights-of-Way Phase 10. - a) How many kilometers of New Distribution Rights-of-Way work have been completed to date for Phase 10? - b) How many kilomete...

AI summary The request seeks a status and cost update on Phase 10 of the New Distribution Rights-of-Way project, including completed and projected kilometers, discrepancies with previous capital applications, and the expected final unit cost per kilometer for contracts.

Request IR-134:
Request IR-134: - The estimated unit cost estimate for C0061521 New Distribution Rights-of-Way Phase 10 was - $34,200 per km (page 6 of 8 of NS Power's capital application in M11921). In the current - application for Phase 11, the unit est...

AI summary The document requests an explanation for a 26% increase in the unit cost estimate for Phase 11 of the New Distribution Rights-of-Way project, from $34,200 per km in Phase 10 to $43,200 per km, with supporting information.

Request IR-135:
Request IR-135: - Please provide NS Power's estimated annual reduction of long-term operational costs resulting - from completion of the widening program.

AI summary The document requests Nova Scotia Power to provide an estimate of the annual reduction in long-term operational costs resulting from the completion of the widening program.

Request IR-139:
Request IR-139: - Please explain why this project cost significantly more than CI C0075168 16W-301G-Short Beach - Reconductor $672,641, CI C0043230 65V-301- Nictaux West Reconductor $286,340 and CI - C0031107 55V-314G- Aylesford East Recon...

AI summary The request seeks an explanation for why the current project's cost is significantly higher compared to several previously completed reconductor projects, including those in Short Beach, Nictaux West, and Aylesford East.

D03: C0080612 57C-426H Melrose Reconductor and Line Extension Phase 1
D03: C0080612 57C-426H Melrose Reconductor and Line Extension Phase 1

AI summary The document outlines the Melrose Reconductor and Line Extension Phase 1 project, focusing on infrastructure upgrades for the electricity grid. It discusses the need for reconductoring and line extensions to enhance reliability and capacity, with considerations for cost, performance, and regulatory compliance.

Request IR-141:
Request IR-141: - Please explain why the estimated costs of this project is about 50% more than CI C0070646 57C- - 425H Stillwater Phase Extension.

AI summary The request seeks an explanation for the estimated costs of the project being approximately 50% higher than those of the Stillwater Phase Extension project (CI C0070646 57C-425H).

Request IR-142:
Request IR-142: - In reference to the Capital Plan Detailed Estimates: - a) Why does NS Power consider that easements will be required for this project, but not for CI C0080266 New Distribution Right of Way Phase 11? b) Why is vegetation m...

AI summary The document contains two questions regarding NS Power's Capital Plan Detailed Estimates. The first asks why easements are required for one project but not another, and the second inquires why vegetation management is included in one capital project rather than being assigned to other capital expenditures.

General Plant Capital Investments
General Plant Capital Investments

AI summary The section discusses General Plant Capital Investments, focusing on infrastructure and capital expenditures related to energy generation and distribution. It highlights the importance of strategic planning and investment in power generation facilities.

Request IR-143:
Request IR-143: - a) Is this project a continuation of C0051815, Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) Replacements Program, Phase 6 mentioned in ACE 2025, which involves replacing 14 of the 74 RTUs that will have been replaced? - b) Please provide a...

AI summary Request IR-143 seeks detailed information about the RTU replacements project, including its relation to previous phases, labor breakdowns, substation details, communication systems, use of test equipment, and whether the project will be handled internally or by contractors.

Request IR-146:
Request IR-146: - a) What are the expected annual operations and maintenance costs associated with the proposed project? - i. What will be the sustaining costs for this project over the next 10 years? - b) Does NS Power expect to hire addi...

AI summary The document requests detailed financial and operational information regarding a proposed project, including annual operations and maintenance costs, staffing requirements, total cost of ownership analysis, and expected annual cost benefits or savings over the next 10 years.

Request IR-148:
Request IR-148: - Please confirm, or explain, otherwise, that summing the amounts in Appendix B Less than $1M, the total budget for Trenton 5 is $5.4M. - a) Overall, how much is NS Power planning to spend on Trenton 5 in 2026, including ot...

AI summary The text requests clarification on NS Power's capital expenditure plans for Trenton 5, including budget figures, criticality ratings, and justification for low-risk investments in a unit nearing retirement. It also asks for total spending on Trenton 5 and the whole Trenton station in 2026, as well as expenditures in 2025.

Request IR-151:
Request IR-151: - In Appendix D on page 455, the proposed change to the requirements directing when to apply for a FIN is an increase of the underspent threshold from -5%/ $250,000 to -10%/ $500,000 in order to exclude contingency. - a) Pl...

AI summary The text discusses proposed changes to the financial incentive (FIN) application requirements, including increasing the underspent threshold and excluding contingency. It asks for stakeholder feedback, whether NS Power considered excluding contingency in the threshold calculation, and if NS Power will notify the Board of significant underspending below the $1M approval threshold.

Request IR-152:
Request IR-152: - Page 465 of the ACE Plan application provides the definition of "scope" as contained in the CEJC Summary Document as follows: " Scope: A project's stated goals (overall objectives the project aims to achieve), deliverable...

AI summary The document requests clarification on how NS Power's definition of project scope, as outlined in the CEJC Summary Document, aligns with industry-standard definitions such as those from PMBOK. It also asks for examples of project scope statements and an explanation of how the definition supports project management practices.

Request IR-153:
Request IR-153: Page 465 of the ACE Plan application provides the definition of "scope change" as contained in the CEJC Summary Document as follows: "A project is considered to have had a scope change when the stated intent from the origin...

AI summary The document requests an explanation of how the CEJC's definition of a project scope change aligns with the PMBOK definition, highlighting differences in terminology and context.

Request IR-154:
Request IR-154: - Page 632 states: "The most recent update includes $45.1 million in sustaining investment - between the years of 2026–2030, compared to the prior year forecast of $40.6 million over the - same period. Attachment 1 outlines...

AI summary The text discusses requests for information on sustaining capital spending for the Mersey hydro system in 2025, comparing actual spending to forecasts, and inquires about the forecast dates for the next major refurbishment of the Cowie Falls Unit 12 turbine and generator.

Request IR-159:
Request IR-159: - Page 636: in compiling NS Power's Mersey NPV analysis, the Company used an annual average - MHS production of 190,000 MWh based on 2015 to 2024 data. - a) Please provide the annual MHS annual production for each year from...

AI summary The request asks NS Power to provide annual MHS production data from 2015 to 2024 and to explain why a 10-year average was used in the NPV analysis instead of more recent data from 2022 to 2024.

Request IR-160:
Request IR-160: - Redevelopment Costs: on page 637, NS Power states: "This year, the estimate has been updated to include preparatory work leading up to construction. The cost of this work is roughly estimated to be $8.5 million. Activitie...

AI summary NS Power has updated the redevelopment cost estimate to include preparatory work, estimated at $8.5 million, to be spent between 2028 and 2030. Questions are raised about why this work is not planned for 2026 and 2027 and whether Mi'kmaq and stakeholder engagement is included in the costs.

Request IR-161:
Request IR-161: - Partial Decommissioning Costs: - a) On page 638, NS Power states: "The MHS partial decommissioning cost estimate was based on detailed work completed in 2021, leveraging the Big Falls rebuild scenario as a baseline due to...

AI summary NS Power provided details on the partial decommissioning costs for the Mersey Hydro Station (MHS), including the basis for the estimate and the inclusion of concrete water control and retaining structures. A discrepancy between the stated cost of $512 million and an attachment estimate of $624 million is noted and requires explanation.

Request IR-162:
Request IR-162: - Attachment 1: - a) Please provide a copy of Attachment 1 in electronic format, complete with all formulae intact. - b) Please explain why the estimated cost for partial decommissioning is higher than that for full decommi...

AI summary The document contains a request (IR-162) with several questions regarding the decommissioning costs and capital sustaining cost estimates for NS Power. The questions focus on the discrepancy between partial and full decommissioning costs, the exclusion of sustaining capital costs in partial decommissioning, and the inflation allowance applied to capital sustaining costs.

Request IR-173:
Request IR-173: - According to Exhibit N-7, page 655 in matter M12415, Point Aconi will be retired on 12-2029. Is this the current date for Point Aconi's retirement? If not, please provide the current expected date of retirement. - a) In t...

AI summary The document requests clarification on the retirement date of Point Aconi, the financial commitments for its maintenance and upgrades in 2026, and the benefits of continued investment in the plant despite its planned retirement by the end of the decade.

Request IR-175:
Request IR-175: - Page 678, NS Power states "…Decision Gate 3 (DG3) governance milestone is planned for - December 2025. Advancement of the project through DG3 enables project sanction, with kickoff - of the construction contract in Q1 202...

AI summary NS Power outlines the planned timeline for the project, stating that the Decision Gate 3 (DG3) governance milestone is scheduled for December 2025, enabling project sanction and the kickoff of the construction contract in Q1 2026. The Board has been informed about DG3 after the application was filed.

Request IR-202:
Request IR-202: - In response to one of the 2025 ACE Plan Board directives, the utility provided a list of transmission - line replacement and upgrade projects that have been approved and completed since the 2021 - ACE Plan. If the cost of...

AI summary The document requests confirmation of the total actual cost of nine transmission line replacement and upgrade projects after excluding C0043010, along with details on the original commissioning dates, kilometers refurbished, and the utility's assessment of the effectiveness of these upgrades in reducing failure probability and cost per kilometer.

100691NSEB (NSPI) IR 1 to 202 - Word 39 passages
Section 1
M12619 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF: IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for Approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan - $284 mi...

AI summary This document is a non-confidential information request from the Nova Scotia Energy Board to Nova Scotia Power Inc. regarding the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan of $284 million. The request includes inquiries about targeted reliability projects and references a figure showing total capital investment.

Section 2
hose in the individual Capital Investments (Generation, Transmission, Distribution and General Plant). Figure 1 Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) Total Capital Investment: Historical, Budget and Forecast. 1. In the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditu...

AI summary The document presents a series of questions concerning Nova Scotia Power's capital investment plans, particularly focusing on the reasons for changes in expected expenditures, constraints applied, and assumptions regarding external funding and depreciation rates.

Section 3
hese funding assumptions. 6. Please confirm whether the capital investment trajectory shown in Figure 1 would remain unchanged if assumed external funding is delayed, reduced, or does not materialize. In reference to Figure 2 – Total Annua...

AI summary The text requests clarification on capital investment assumptions, changes in forecast spending for various functions, and the categorization of specific infrastructure items. It also asks for an Excel version of a figure and compares budget figures between different plans.

Section 4
Generation and Transmission and please detail if there were changes to specific projects driving these reductions. Figures 3 and 4 Breakdown of Capital Forecast by Investment Type on pages 16 and 17. 1. The 2025 ACE Plan application includ...

AI summary The text requests clarification on changes in capital spending forecasts for the NS-NB reliability tie project and coal-fired generation fleet, as well as the decrease in regulatory/compliance spending. It references figures and the 2025 ACE Plan application, highlighting discrepancies in budget estimates for the ECEI – Synchronous Condenser project.

Section 5
Condenser for 2026 to 2029. The values presented in the application are lower for 2026, 2028 and 2029, albeit higher for 2027 compared to the budget estimates presented in the 2025 ACE Plan in M12012. 1. In its 2025 ACE Plan application, N...

AI summary The text discusses capital spending estimates for the ECEI – Synchronous Condenser project from 2026 to 2029, noting an increase compared to the 2025 ACE Plan. It also requests explanations for the extension of the project timeline, spending changes, and IT-related cybersecurity projects. Additionally, it asks for deferred or cancelled projects with a criticality rating of 16 or higher from the 2025 ACE Plan.

Section 7
ns for the significant decrease in the total estimated project cost between the 2025 and 2026 ACE Plans. In reference to Figure 10 – 2026 Capital Items Forecast for Subsequent Submittal, pages 34-38. 1. To what AACE Class level have the co...

AI summary The text discusses questions related to cost estimates for capital projects, specifically the 2026 Capital Items Forecast, the Tusket Powerhouse Tidal Pool Fish Passage project, and the Michelin DVR Phase 2 project. It also requests information on the number of steam generation projects under $1M in the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan.

Section 8
$1M Figure 12: Historical Number of Projects Less Than $1M indicates that there are 330 steam projects in 2026. Please identify the number of projects for each individual steam generation facility. 1. In reference to Appendix B, tab Less t...

AI summary The text requests clarification on the number of steam generation projects under $1M in the 2026 ACE plan, specifically for Trenton 5, TUC3, and Lingan 2. It also asks for explanations on why certain projects are listed separately and whether NS Power has internal spending thresholds for such projects.

Section 9
NS Power apply any internal aggregate cap or approval threshold to the total annual spending on projects with estimated total project costs of less than $1M? Section 6.0 Generation pages 40 to 46 Board staff note that over the five-year pe...

AI summary The document contains a series of questions directed at NS Power regarding its capital expenditures on generation projects with costs under $1M, including budgeted and actual spending, alignment with the 2030 plan, and categorization of expenditures. It also requests confirmation of project inclusions in the 2026 ACE Plan and details on forecast utilization rates and health and risk profiling for generating units.

Section 10
acilities. Figure 17: Generation Carry-over Capital Spending Summary. Have there been any changes to the Final Date for any of the projects listed in Figure 17 since the 2026 ACE Plan has been filed? 1. Please identify each of these carry-...

AI summary The text consists of a series of questions directed at NS Power regarding capital spending, project timelines, and updates to hydro generation plans. It seeks clarification on budget overruns, project statuses, and changes in planning between the 2025 and 2026 Hydro Interval Plans.

Section 11
Please provide a table listing the capital work NS Power plans to complete on its hydro generation assets in 2026 and beyond, similar to the one provided in the response to 2025 ACE Plan NSUARB IR-13. Section 7.0 Transmission pages 46 to 5...

AI summary The document requests information on NS Power's planned capital work on hydro generation assets and asks for explanations regarding the proposed decrease in transmission investment. It also inquires about the expected improvements in performance standards metrics from the 2026 ACE Plan T&D projects and whether distribution capital investments will improve system reliability.

Section 12
2. If so, please explain how. Figure 22: Transmission Carry-over Capital Spending Summary. Have there been changes to the Final Date for any of the projects listed since the ACE Plan has been filed? 1. Please identify each of these carry-o...

AI summary The text requests explanations regarding changes to the final dates of transmission and distribution projects, identifies carry-over projects exceeding the Board approved amounts, and seeks justifications for negative subsequent spending and early capital commitments. It also asks for explanations of increased expenditures and projects advanced ahead of confirmed requirements.

Section 13
of these carry-over projects that has a current total estimate amount that exceeds the Board approved amount by the ATO threshold and identify the related dollar amount over the Board approved amount. Please explain why the following proje...

AI summary The text requests explanations for increases in project expenditures and changes in project timelines related to carry-over projects and the 2026 ACE application. It also asks for reasons behind proposed increases in general plant investment for 2028 and 2029 compared to the 2025 ACE Plan.

Section 14
1 C0062043 IT Sharepoint Technical Migration Section 10.0 Routine Capital Program pages 59 to 86 In reference to Figure 34 – Routine Capital Spending Project Breakdown Yr/Yr on page 59 to 60. Please describe the reasons for the significant...

AI summary The document requests explanations for increased 2026 spending on transmission line replacements, distribution upgrades, and work vehicles. It notes that routine capital expenditures remain high despite being labeled as 'like for like' replacements, and questions whether NS Power has achieved efficiency gains. The increase is attributed to higher-than-expected reactive outages due to asset failures.

Section 15
r’s response to Board IR-1 in M12319, it was indicated that the sustained increase is a result of a higher-than-expected volume of reactive power outages due to asset failures and deteriorated assets. 1. Please provide the number of outage...

AI summary The document outlines requests for information related to outages, capital expenditures, and budget variances. It also includes a request for an explanation of a budget increase for regulatory replacements and planned equipment replacements.

Section 16
his routine. 1. Please provide a detailed explanation for the drivers of this increase. 2. Please also explain why D006 was under budget in 2025. D055 - Planned Replacement of Distribution Equipment 1. This routine is set to increase by $5...

AI summary The text outlines several requests for detailed explanations and cost breakdowns related to various routines, including planned equipment replacement, new customer upgrades, and provincial widening. Questions focus on budget variances, cost drivers, and the methodology used for budgeting.

Section 19
underspent in 2025, including any key drivers, changes in scope, timing of projects, or other factors that contributed to the variance between budgeted and actual expenditures. Distribution routines: 1. Please explain how the forecasting m...

AI summary The text requests an explanation of forecasting methodologies used for capital expenditures, focusing on avoiding reliance on historical spending, incorporating external benchmarks, and clarifying the scope and justification for new routines. It also asks for details on how forecast volumes and costs were developed for each routine and actual expenditures for 2022-2025.

Section 20
in how forecast volumes and costs were developed for each routine. Provide actual expenditure for projects that would be classified under each new routine for 2022-2025. D061 and D062 – New Customers 1. Please update the attachment provide...

AI summary The document requests updated financial and operational data for new customer routines, including actual expenditures and forecasts from 2022 to 2026, and a comparison of capital project funding sources and forecasting methodologies. It also asks for an explanation of budget variances and a table comparing IRP and ACE Plan spending per unit.

Section 25
lysis of the results of this survey is underway with a draft report expected for NS Power’s review in late 2025.” 1. What is the status of this report? 2. What are the summary findings of the report? Page 100 of the application discusses t...

AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to the status of a customer survey report, reliability cost efficiency (RCE) metrics, outage causes, and the use of resilient equipment by NS Power. These questions pertain to the 2025 ACE Plan and the evaluation of capital project cost estimates.

Section 28
or this project, along with any risks that could affect the project submission. INDIVIDUAL CAPITAL INVESTMENTS Generation Capital Investments G01: C0080206 POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 What is the current forecasted retirement date for th...

AI summary The document outlines a series of questions regarding the refurbishment of the Point Aconi Generating Facility's boiler in 2026, including the expected operational life extension, assessment of alternatives to the project, deficiencies requiring refurbishment, and logistics of parts procurement and inspection.

Section 29
on reveals that some parts and/or components do not need to be replaced, can already purchased replacement parts be returned for no additional cost to the project? Please explain. 1. If not, why not? Please provide a copy of the Point Acon...

AI summary The text contains a series of questions regarding capital projects, including boiler refractory replacement and shoreline sheetpile refurbishment, focusing on cost efficiency, timing, inventory management, and compliance with documented practices such as the Point Aconi 'Boiler Tube Repair Thermal Maintenance Practice (TMP-004)' from the 2022 ACE Plan.

Section 31
severe, and the remainder of the cells below the midtide zone where capacity is compromised. Without intervention, the continued deterioration poses serious risks to structural stability and safety.” 1. What are the net present value and t...

AI summary The text discusses concerns about the structural integrity of corroded steel sheet pile structures and requests for cost-benefit analyses, design drawings, RFP status, and permitting progress for a project. It highlights the need for economic assessments and regulatory engagement.

Section 36
a level rise will be incorporated into the project design. 2. Please describe how this aligns with NS Power’s Climate Adaptation Plan. Please explain what Attachment 2 is intended to represent. 1. Please explain how the cost estimates in A...

AI summary The text includes questions regarding project design alignment with NS Power’s Climate Adaptation Plan, cost estimates in Attachment 2, blade replacement in a turbine project, and the forecast capacity and utilization factors for TUC1. It also asks about blade inspection results and spare blade procurement.

Section 37
is conclusion was reached. How many blades were found to have cracks during the inspection in March 2025? 1. How many blades will be replaced through this project? 2. Will spare blades be purchased? Is the manufacturer of the blades based...

AI summary The document contains questions regarding a project involving blade replacement and coating refurbishment. Issues include the number of cracked blades, replacement plans, manufacturer location, budget justification, alternative solutions, and project timelines and costs. Questions also focus on procurement processes and the effectiveness of the new coating against freeze-thaw cycling.

Section 38
t found “the freeze-thaw cycling as the dominant root cause of the cracking.” Will the new two-coat epoxy system provide greater resistance to the freeze-thaw cycling compared to the existing coating? In reference to the contingency of 20%...

AI summary The text includes technical and procedural questions about infrastructure projects, including coating resistance to freeze-thaw cycles, contingency costs for adverse weather, turbine material sourcing, inspection practices, and procurement processes. Questions are directed at NS Power regarding project planning, cost estimation, and compliance with procedures.

Section 39
r no additional cost to the project? Please explain. 1. If not, why not? In reference to Attachments 1 and 2, please confirm the noted pricing was obtained through a competitive procurement process. 1. If not confirmed, please explain. G07...

AI summary The text includes a series of questions related to the cost and procurement process of a fly ash hauling system and engine refurbishment project. It requests confirmation of competitive procurement, cost details, and evaluation of alternative systems. The questions also cover maintenance, cost savings, and Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) analysis.

Section 40
sts between 2025 and 2049. G08: C0080135 CT-BGT2 Engine Refurbishment Please provide a high-level summary and dates of any refurbishment work conducted on the Burnside Combustion Turbine Unit 2. 1. How many operating hours has the unit run...

AI summary The document requests information about the refurbishment history of the Burnside Combustion Turbine Unit 2, including operating hours, OEM recommendations, and the number of operations in 2024 and 2025. It also asks about third-party reviews of inspection findings and the ability of remaining CT units and battery storage systems to maintain system reliability if CT-BGT2 is out of operation. Cost-effectiveness analysis for refurbishment versus purchasing a new engine is requested.

Section 41
ned to be more cost effective to refurbish the existing engine rather than purchasing a previously owned engine.” Please provide the analysis/data to support that refurbishment is more cost effective. Please describe any work NS Power has...

AI summary The text contains a series of questions directed at Nova Scotia Power (NS Power) regarding the cost-effectiveness of refurbishing an existing engine, sourcing materials, capital and operational costs of the CT-BGT2 unit, and the basis for project estimates related to transmission upgrades.

Section 42
eering process. 1. If not confirmed, please explain why. Please provide cost support references from similar projects recently completed and update the detailed project estimates for each project. Please provide specific details on the cri...

AI summary The text outlines a series of requests for detailed project cost estimates, asset replacement criteria, and specific project-related information. It includes questions about NS Power's transformer additions and replacements, as well as requests for supporting documentation and GIS maps.

Section 43
the load on either 89W‑T1 or 70W‑T53? Please include a GIS map drawing to support the explanation. 6. Please submit the 2006 planning report. T03: C0080109 L7001 Replacements and Upgrades Phase 1 1. Please provide the inspection results an...

AI summary The text contains a series of requests for information related to infrastructure replacement and upgrades, including GIS maps, inspection results, cost estimates, and transformer replacement details. The focus is on verifying the need for replacements, incorporating LiDAR data, and comparing unit costs to previous plans.

Section 49
e explain any discrepancy with this amount and the amount identified in NS Power’s capital application under Matter M11921. 3. What is the expected final unit cost per km for “contracts” for Phase 10? The estimated unit cost estimate for C...

AI summary The text contains a series of questions directed at NS Power regarding capital applications, cost estimates for distribution rights-of-way, long-term operational cost reductions, and the effectiveness of vegetation management and reliability plans. The questions seek clarification on discrepancies in costs, the use of automation technologies, and the Board's role in assessing future investments.

Section 50
ive-Year Reliability Plan is being reviewed in Matter M12558. Should the Board await the results of this review before approving further large-scale vegetation management investments? If not, why not? The application notes that Phase 11 wi...

AI summary The document raises questions about the costs and justification for several infrastructure projects, including the use of satellite imagery and AI in vegetation management, cost differences between projects, and the budgeting of travel expenses. It also questions the inclusion of vegetation management under certain capital expenditures.

Section 51
ase 11? 2. Why is vegetation management listed under this capital project and not assigned to other capital expenditures? General Plant Capital Investments GP01 C0080111, 2026 RTU Deployment 1. Is this project a continuation of C0051815, R...

AI summary The text includes questions about capital projects, specifically vegetation management, RTU deployment, and an intelligent asset data capture platform. Questions focus on project continuity, labor breakdowns, substation details, communication systems, equipment lifespan, contractor use, and emergency power disconnection capabilities.

Section 52
drawing to explain this statement in terms of the existing configuration and the changes that will occur after this project. GP02: C0080252, Intelligent Asset Data Capture & Integration Platform 1. Please provide a report outlining the bus...

AI summary The text outlines a series of questions related to the business case, costs, and risk ratings for various projects under the 2026 ACE Plan, including the Intelligent Asset Data Capture & Integration Platform and IT projects. It also requests confirmation of budget figures for the Trenton 5 project.

Section 53
ase explain the rating of 25 for the ECEI Synchronous Condensers. Please confirm, or explain, otherwise, that summing the amounts in Appendix B Less than $1M, the total budget for Trenton 5 is $5.4M. 1. Overall, how much is NS Power planni...

AI summary The text raises questions about NS Power's capital expenditures for Trenton 5, including the rationale for low-risk-rated projects, budget figures, and stakeholder engagement related to the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). It also references Appendix D of the CEJC document, which discusses scope changes and stakeholder discussions.

Section 57
Power project scope statements for two capital projects (greater in value than $1M) initiated by the Company in 2025. 3. Please explain how NS Power’s definition of project scope adequately serves as: A benchmark for measuring and controll...

AI summary The text discusses the scope definitions and management practices for capital projects by NS Power, including the alignment of the CEJC definition of scope change with PMBOK standards. It also requests information on sustaining capital spending for the Mersey hydro system in 2025 and compares it to forecasts from the 2025 ACE Plan.

Section 60
027. 3. Please confirm that this work, and the related cost estimates, also includes Mi’kmaq and stakeholder engagement activities. 4. If not confirmed, please explain. Partial Decommissioning Costs: 1. On page 638, NS Power states: “The M...

AI summary The document requests clarification on the inclusion of Mi’kmaq and stakeholder engagement in cost estimates and questions discrepancies in the partial decommissioning cost of the MHS. It highlights differences between the stated cost and an attachment, and seeks explanation on the scope of decommissioning activities.

Section 61
decommission the MHS is $512 million CAD.” Board staff notes that Attachment 1 of Appendix E denotes an estimate partial decommissioning cost of $624M. Please explain this discrepancy. Attachment 1: 1. Please provide a copy of Attachment 1...

AI summary The document raises questions about discrepancies in decommissioning cost estimates for MHS, retirement dates for Trenton generating units, and the strategic benefits of holding generating units in cold reserve. It also requests clarification on the value for money of these decisions and the inflation allowance incorporated into capital sustaining cost estimates.

Section 65
o Exhibit N-7, page 655 in matter M12415, Point Aconi will be retired on 12-2029. Is this the current date for Point Aconi’s retirement? If not, please provide the current expected date of retirement. 1. In total, how much will NS Power sp...

AI summary The document includes questions regarding the retirement date and 2026 costs for the Point Aconi generation plant, as well as inquiries about control system parameters for new inverter-based resources (IBRs) and project governance milestones. NS Power has outlined plans for capital projects and project sanction timelines.

Section 72
e the locations for the Trip Saver Installations chosen? 2. Can the Trip Savers be operated remotely? Can NS Power provide a breakdown of the anticipated 2025 investments by the following categories: Recloser Installations Trip save Instal...

AI summary The text outlines a series of questions regarding NS Power's 2025 and 2026 investment plans, including the selection of locations for various infrastructure projects and the confirmation of the total actual cost of completed transmission line replacement and upgrade projects since 2021.

100696SBA (NSPI) IR 1 to 29 - PDF 7 passages
1 M12619 p. p. 1
1 M12619 2 3 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 4 5 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended 6 7 8 9 10 11 IN THE MATTER OF: An application by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of approximatel...

AI summary This document is an information request from the Small Business Advocate to Nova Scotia Power, Inc. (NS Power), regarding its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals $702.1 million. The request is part of a regulatory proceeding under the Public Utilities Act.

Section 2 p. p. 1
Refer to M12619, Exhibit N-1, the Application for Approval of NS Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (the "Application"), Page 22 of 782, Section 4, Annual Capital Expenditure Plan Follow Up, and item 4), which states: The B...

AI summary The Board has directed NS Power to update information regarding priority distribution feeders in the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, referencing specific figures and appendices in the application. The text also refers to figures showing Right of Way (ROW) investment in the ACE Plan.

Preamble p. p. 1
b) What is the share of this total amount of planned investment requested in a) above as a percent of: i) Total Distribution capital projects in this Application? ii) Total Transmission and Distribution projects in this Application? M12619...

AI summary The text outlines questions related to the distribution and transmission projects in NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, focusing on investment percentages, reliability improvements, impacted feeders, customer classes, capacity upgrades, and growth support. These questions are part of a regulatory proceeding.

Risk Register p. pp. 1-2
Risk Register Review this document against the Project Description, including the contingency statement to ensure that all risks are properly considered when applying a contingency percentage. Discuss with project manager to confirm that a...

AI summary The document outlines a risk register for a capital project approval process, asking for examples of projects with risks managed via contingency, high-risk projects, and those affected by changes in the project delivery model. It also inquires about excluded projects and past projects that may not meet new risk assessment standards.

8 Request IR-5: p. p. 3
8 Request IR-5: 9 Refer to the Application, Appendix D, Section 13, Page 570 of 782, Final Cost Application (FIN) 10 Requirements, which states: 11 13.0 Final Cost Application (FIN) Requirements 12 Individual capital item projects that hav...

AI summary The document raises questions about the interpretation of variance thresholds in the Final Cost Application (FIN) requirements. Specifically, it asks whether NS Power intended the -10% variance to be compared to the positive variance threshold and if the wording should be revised for clarity.

Request IR-9: p. pp. 4-6
Request IR-9: - Refer to the Application, Appendix G, Page 751 of 782, Lines 1-20, Section 6.0 Advanced Grid - Modernization Programs. - a) Please explain whether and how the investments in the Grid Modernization Programs, including FLISR,...

AI summary The document contains several regulatory requests (IR-9 through IR-12) related to grid modernization, capital spending, and energy storage projects by NS Power. The requests seek clarification on how investments impact grid capacity, the status of new ROW projects, the meaning of figures in capital spending summaries, and the approval status of a working group related to grid resiliency.

Request IR-14: p. p. 6
Request IR-14: - Please refer to the Application Page 34 of 782, Figure 10: 2026 Capital Items Forecast for Subsequent Submittal, CI# 49595 HYD – TUS 1 Overhaul. - a) How does this project connect or interact with the ongoing Tusket projec...

AI summary The text references a request (IR-14) asking how the Tusket 1 Overhaul project connects with the ongoing Tusket project, which is under review by the Board as an Application to Overspend in M10197.

100697SBA (NSPI) IR 1 to 29 - Word 6 passages
Section 1
M12619 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended IN THE MATTER OF: An application by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 Million of its...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board has requested NS Power to update information regarding priority distribution feeders in its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, referencing specific figures and appendices in the application.

Section 2
n Work Plan by Region[[2]](#footnote-3) Figure 34: 2026 Distribution Corridor Widening with Managed Rights-of-Way (ROW)[[3]](#footnote-4) 1. What is the total amount of investment planned for 2026 for the ROW projects shown in Figure 33 an...

AI summary The text presents a series of questions related to NS Power's 2026 investment plans for distribution corridor widening and managed rights-of-way (ROW), including the share of investment relative to total capital projects, reliability improvements, customer classes impacted, and methodology for forecasting customer changes.

Section 4
ol and risk assessment. 5. Were any projects included in NS Power’s request for approval in the past two ACE Plans that would not meet this improved PDM test? If so, please identify and explain why. Refer the Application Section 11.1.1 Sus...

AI summary The text refers to questions and figures from NS Power’s application regarding capital investment planning, cost variances, and regulatory requirements. It asks whether past projects meet an improved PDM test, compares investment levels in the 2026 ACE Plan with the Evergreen IRP, and seeks clarification on cost variance thresholds and their interpretation.

Section 6
vent scheduled for February 3, 2026, as described in this event link below: 1. Please confirm whether the DLR Deployment project that NS Power will present at Distributech, described as the largest undertaken in North America, is included...

AI summary The text includes questions regarding NS Power's upcoming presentation on the DLR Deployment project, the benefits of the Dynamic Line Rating upgrade, oversight under IESO Nova Scotia, and grid modernization programs. It also references specific sections of the Application and asks about the impact of these investments on customer demand and system capacity.

Section 7
plication, Page 68 of 782, Lines 9 – 26, Section 10.4, 2026 Routine Capital Spending Project Details, which refers to the status of NS Power’s Right-of-Way (ROW) transmission and distribution projects 1. Does any of the ROW widening projec...

AI summary The text contains a series of questions raised in a regulatory proceeding regarding NS Power's 2026 capital spending projects, including ROW widening, energy storage, grid resiliency, and the Country Harbour Cell Tower. It also references the Tusket project and its interaction with an ongoing overspend application.

Section 11
re 42: Illustration of Targeted NS Power Transmission Projects Planned for 2026 1. L-6536 appears to extend into New Brunswick. Please confirm if that is the case and, if it is, what is the reason. 1. M12619, Exhibit N-1, NS Power’s Applic...

AI summary The document references a request regarding the L-6536 transmission line extending into New Brunswick and provides several citations to NS Power’s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan application, including sections related to project approvals and cost justification criteria.

100699IG (NSPI) IR 1 to 25 - PDF 13 passages
Section 3
- 3 Preamble: NSPI states that the 2027–2030 capital forecast "does not include considerations - 4 for external funding that is not already in place" and that while external funding is "expected, the - 5 amount cannot be forecast at this t...

AI summary NSPI's 2027–2030 capital forecast excludes external funding not already in place. The request asks for details on existing external funding sources, their associated projects, and anticipated funding amounts. Discrepancies in approval requests are highlighted, and the significant increase in capital spending budgets for 2025 and 2026 is noted.

- 26 million.
- 26 million. 1 2 3 4 5 (a) Please explain the principal drivers of the increase in capital spending budgets in 2025 and 2026, and going forward, with specific reference to projects, capital investment required, and the portion attributabl...

AI summary The text outlines a regulatory inquiry into the principal drivers of increased capital spending budgets for 2025 and 2026, including the impact on customer rates, affordability considerations, and the inclusion of external funding in capital investment figures. References are made to the 2026 ACE Plan and specific figures and appendices.

29 (i) the name and CI number;
29 (i) the name and CI number; 1 2 (ii) the 2025 budget/forecast originally anticipated in the 2025 ACE Plan; 3 (iii) 2025 actual spend (if any); 4 (iv) variance between budget vs actual; and 5 6 (v) disposition (deferred/cancelled) with t...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory requests related to NSPI's 2025 capital spending, including budget variances, project deferrals, and cost tracking for Right-of-Way (ROW) acquisitions and maintenance. It also requests clarification on the inclusion of Reliability Tie costs in the 2026 ACE Plan.

3 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 24, lines 19-25.
3 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 24, lines 19-25. 4 The Board directs NS Power to submit any future capital expenditures that exceed 5 $1 million for approval to the Board, regardless of the source of funding. NS Power acknowledges th...

AI summary The Board has directed NS Power to seek approval for any future capital expenditures exceeding $1 million, regardless of funding source. NS Power acknowledges the directive and notes that the first applicable project, C0080252, has a total below $1 million due to federal funding. Questions are raised about whether this is the only applicable project and about providing detailed cost and funding information for applicable projects.

1 And Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, pages 28-29 Figure 7: Subsequent Submittal Project
1 And Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, pages 28-29 Figure 7: Subsequent Submittal Project 2 Status Update; and Appendix C – Updated Q3 Capital Reports. - 3 (a) Please confirm that, although these projects were not included in the 2025 4 ACE...

AI summary The document requests confirmation on whether certain projects not included in the 2025 ACE Plan were included in NSPI's overall 2025 capital spending forecast total of $692.4 million.

Preamble
- 6 (b) Please elaborate on how the cybersecurity breach in 2025 impacted the 7 decision to defer or cancel any of the listed capital projects in 2025, as 8 referenced in Appendix C, including specifically the nine IT projects 9 deferred t...

AI summary The text includes questions about the impact of a 2025 cybersecurity breach on capital project decisions, the meaning of 'Resources were required for priority restoration,' and the cybersecurity implications of deferring IT projects. It also asks about updated risk assessments and mitigation plans.

21 Request IR-12:
21 Request IR-12: - 22 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 29, Figure 7: Subsequent Submittal Project Status - 23 Update; page 57, Figure 35: Routine Capital Spending Project Breakdown Yr/Yr; and - 24 Appendix C Updated Q3 Capital Reports....

AI summary NSPI has deferred nine IT General Plan projects from 2025 and 2026, now anticipating them as 2026 Subsequent Submittals. Additionally, IT projects with carry-over capital spending from 2025 or earlier are listed.

- 28 (a) Please explain the variance in forecasted total expense between the 2025 29 ACE Plan and the 2026 ACE Plan for each of the following projects,
- 28 (a) Please explain the variance in forecasted total expense between the 2025 29 ACE Plan and the 2026 ACE Plan for each of the following projects, 1 2 including key drivers (scope, schedule, vendor costs, resourcing, cyber related req...

AI summary The document requests an explanation of the variance in forecasted total expense between the 2025 and 2026 ACE Plans for specific IT projects, including the impact of the 2025 cybersecurity breach, reconciliation of project treatment, and an explanation of the significant increase in spending and number of under-£1M projects in 2026.

9 Request IR-15:
9 Request IR-15: - 10 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 57, Figure 32: General Plant Carry-over Capital - 11 Spending Summary, "C0061284 IT OT Cyber Security Control Implementation Phase 1". - 12 (a) Please confirm this project was origi...

AI summary Request IR-15 focuses on the C0061284 IT OT Cyber Security Control Implementation Phase 1 project, its deferral from the 2024 ACE Plan to 2025, and its impact on NSPI's cybersecurity risk profile. The request also asks about any broader cybersecurity implementation plans by NSPI.

1 Request IR-16:
1 Request IR-16: - 2 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 62, Figure 35: Routine Capital Spending Project - 3 Breakdown Yr/Yr "P063 CI: 39304, Class 3 Work Vehicle Replacements". - 4 NSPI requests an increase of approximately $4 million in...

AI summary NSPI is requesting a $4 million increase in Class 3 Work Vehicle Replacements for 2026, up from an $11 million expense in 2025, which itself had increased by $9 million from 2024. The request seeks an explanation for this significant increase.

7 Request IR-17:
7 Request IR-17: - 8 Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 62, Figure 35 : Routine Capital Spending Project - 9 Breakdown Yr/Yr; page 70, Figure 42: Summary of Forecasting Methodology for - 10 Distribution Routines; and page 73, Figure 44: D...

AI summary The document requests the 5-year historical dataset used for forecasting D008 Provincial Storm spending in 2026, excluding 'Extreme Event Day storms,' and seeks clarification on which storms were excluded and their quantitative impact on the forecast.

- 29 (ii) its interfaces with the "broader Energy Delivery team" and 30 "Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) team"; and
- 29 (ii) its interfaces with the "broader Energy Delivery team" and 30 "Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) team"; and 1 (iii) accountability (role/title) for vegetation management, feeder 2 inspection, transmission line inspection, capital...

AI summary The document outlines requests for information related to accountability roles in vegetation management, reliability-based project evaluation metrics, and storm performance updates. It references the 2026 ACE Plan and seeks details on reliability metrics used by other utilities.

25 Year Reliability Plan for 2026.
25 Year Reliability Plan for 2026. 1 2 organized by section, and including rationale for each change. Please identify changes to: 3 (i) Program design or scope; 4 (ii) Prioritization approach or criteria; 5 (iii) Assumptions (cost, timelin...

AI summary The document requests clarification on the 2026 25-Year Reliability Plan, including changes to program design, assumptions, and investment forecasts. It also asks for details on the retirement of Lingan 2 and the impact of IESO-NS procurement efforts on its timeline.

100700IG (NSPI) IR 1 to 25 - Word 14 passages
Section 1
2025 M12619 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual Capital Expenditure (A...

AI summary This document outlines an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for 2026, which totals $702.1 million under the Public Utilities Act.

Section 4
on of or forecasting within the 2026 ACE Plan, Five-Year Reliability Plan Update or the Updated Path to 2030? In relation to the transition to the IESO-NS, and work of the Joint Transition Committee: 1. Please provide: 1. the Terms of Refe...

AI summary The text requests information on the Joint Transition Committee's structure and activities related to the IESO-NS transition, as well as details on external funding for the 2026-2030 ACE Plan. It also notes that the 2027–2030 capital forecast excludes expected but unconfirmed external funding.

Section 5
nd the total amount anticipated (or at least order of magnitude). Reference:N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, pages 14, 31, and 33. Preamble: The Application provides different total approval requests sought. Please reconcile the figures within the 2026...

AI summary The document requests clarification on the discrepancies in the 2026 ACE Plan's total approval requests and asks NSPI to explain the significant increase in capital spending budgets from 2025 and 2026, including the drivers, impact on customer rates, and consideration of affordability. It also asks whether Figure 1 includes external funding and requests an updated figure if not.

Section 6
ss total capital investment, and outline specifically what funding was added. Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 15, Figure 2: NS Power Total Capital Investment: Historical, Budget and Forecast. 1. Please provide an updated version of Fig...

AI summary The text requests an updated version of a capital investment figure, an explanation of variances between forecasts and actuals, and details on deferred or cancelled projects, including their impact on total capital spending in 2025.

Section 7
variance; and 2. the qualitative factors influencing project‑level reallocation decisions. Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 17, Figure 4: Breakdown of Capital Forecast by Investment Type. 1. Please explain how NSPI tracks and recovers c...

AI summary The document outlines questions regarding NSPI's tracking and recovery of Right-of-Way costs, including capital vs O&M treatment, and increasing expenditures for ROW widening. It also references the Board's directive for NS Power to seek approval for future capital expenditures exceeding $1 million, with an example project included for approval.

Section 8
ta Capture & Integration Platform, which due to federal funding has a project total below $1 million. Please refer to Section 5.2, and the attached capital work order documentation for further detail. 1. Where NSPI notes that this is the “...

AI summary The text discusses a project under the 2026 ACE Plan and requests clarification on whether it is the only applicable project. It also addresses the proposed Scope Change definition, arguing that expanding it would increase regulatory filings and create unnecessary complexity.

Section 9
ubstantial regulatory burden on the Company, the Board, and stakeholders, requiring projects to be reviewed multiple times before completion without delivering any meaningful improvement in oversight. 1. Using historical ACE data (for at l...

AI summary The text discusses the regulatory burden caused by frequent scope change filings and the need for mitigation strategies. It also references updated criteria for defining 'scope change' and asks for clarification on their application in future filings.

Section 10
If NSPI does not agree, please explain. 3. Please confirm whether NSPI intends to apply the updated definitions in future CI filings and scope change determinations in 2026. If not, please explain. Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 29, l...

AI summary The document requests clarification from NSPI regarding the application of updated definitions in future filings, the status of capital projects deferred or cancelled in 2025, the impact of a 2025 cybersecurity breach on capital decisions, and the implications for NSPI's cybersecurity risk profile.

Section 11
PI’s cybersecurity risk profile, as assessed internally and/or by third‑party advisors, including any updated risk assessments, audit findings, or mitigation plans (provide documents where available). Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 29...

AI summary The document requests an explanation of the variance in forecasted total expenses for several IT projects between the 2025 and 2026 ACE Plans, including the impact of a 2025 cybersecurity breach. It also asks for reconciliation of the treatment of one project that appears in both 'Subsequent Submittal' and 'Carry-over Capital Spending' categories.

Section 12
nificant increase in forecasted spending for projects less than $1M – approximately $39 million higher than in 2025 – and a notable increase in the number of projects – 122 more projects than in 2025. 1. Please explain the drivers for the...

AI summary The text discusses a significant increase in spending and the number of projects under $1M in 2026, as well as a decrease in renewable generation investment. It requests explanations for these changes, including affordability considerations and compliance with renewable energy standards.

Section 13
h NSPI’s 2030 Clean Power Plan? Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, page 57, Figure 32: General Plant Carry-over Capital Spending Summary, “C0061284 IT - OT Cyber Security Control Implementation Phase 1”. 1. Please confirm this project was orig...

AI summary The text raises questions about NSPI’s 2030 Clean Power Plan, specifically regarding the deferral of a cybersecurity project and the increase in funding for Class 3 Work Vehicle Replacements. It also references forecasting methodologies for distribution routine spending, derived from a 5-year historical average excluding extreme weather events.

Section 15
s reporting, and stakeholder engagement. Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, pages 97-98, “Centre for Energy Advancement through Technological Innovation (CEATI) Grid Resiliency Working Group Update”. 1. Please provide a copy of the final terms...

AI summary The document requests information on the CEATI Grid Resiliency Working Group's terms of reference and outcomes of a resiliency benchmarking survey. It also inquires about metrics for evaluating reliability-based projects and NSPI's review of other utilities' reliability metrics. NSPI has identified capital programs for storm response in 2026.

Section 16
E Plan, pages 112-113, “Update on storm performance and related capital investments”. Preamble: NSPI identifies capital programs for storm response/reactive work for 2026 including D008 and T001. 1. Please describe how NSPI allocates storm...

AI summary NSPI outlines capital programs for storm response in 2026, including D008 and T001, and discusses the allocation of storm-related costs between capital and operating expenses. The document also references the CIS Replacement project and its potential scope changes due to a ransomware attack and new tariff design requirements.

Section 17
impact to the “direction” and “timeline” for this project, does NSPI anticipate filing a scope change application for the C0021835 - IT – CIS Replacement project? If so, when? If not, please explain. Reference: N-1, 2026 ACE Plan, Appendix...

AI summary The document requests NSPI to clarify if it plans to file a scope change application for the IT – CIS Replacement project and to identify projects in the 2026 ACE Plan that correspond to investments in the 5-Year Reliability Plan Update. It also asks if NSPI has conducted affordability, rate impact, or cost-benefit analyses related to the updated reliability spending.

100701DOE (NSPI) Ir 1 to 7 - PDF 5 passages
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act - and - IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (ACE)...

AI summary NS Power has applied for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, totaling $702.1 million, with a request for approximately $284.0 million in funding.

Request IR-1:
Request IR-1: For each of the projects listed below: - C0014218 HYD WRC LEM Balance of Plant - 29807 HYD Tusket Falls Main Dam - C0021140 New 138KV-25KV Substation Stellarton - C0045132 Eastern Clean Energy Initiative (ECEI) Energy Storage...

AI summary Request IR-1 asks for detailed cost and impact information on various energy projects, including initial approval costs, changes in cost, rate impacts, and mitigation actions taken by NS Power. The request focuses on projects with a cost change of 30% or more from their original approval.

Request IR-2:
Request IR-2: For each generation project included in the ACE 2026 having project total $5M and above, please provide: a) The primary purpose of the project (e.g., life-extension, reliability, compliance, capacity, energy, operational flex...

AI summary Request IR-2 asks for detailed information on generation projects in the ACE 2026 with a total cost of $5M or more, including their purpose, impact on asset life, LCOE, comparison with alternatives, planning framework assessment, and effects on rate base and revenue requirements.

Reference: Exhibit N-1: Application - Section 8.0 Distribution
Reference: Exhibit N-1: Application - Section 8.0 Distribution a) Please explain how Distribution capital planning is explicitly linked to historical and forecast customer additions, specifically addressing any deviations from the historic...

AI summary The document contains a series of questions aimed at understanding NS Power's distribution capital planning, spending, cost justification, benchmarking, connection standards, and cost-containment measures. The focus is on linking capital planning to customer growth, cost drivers, and ensuring investments align with forecast benefits.

Reference: Exhibit N-1: Application - Section 9.0 (General Plant) (PDF Page 57)
Reference: Exhibit N-1: Application - Section 9.0 (General Plant) (PDF Page 57) a) General Plant capital for 2026 is forecast at $92.5 M, a significant increase from the 2025 budget of $65M. Please justify this elevated spending relative t...

AI summary The document requests justification for a significant increase in General Plant capital spending in 2026 compared to the 2025 budget, distinguishing between mandatory and discretionary projects. It also asks NS Power to explain the $22M vehicle replacement budget, evaluate deferral or extended asset life scenarios, and justify the prudence of this investment relative to historical averages.

100702DOE (NSPI) Ir 1 to 7 - Word 5 passages
Section 1
M12619 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act - and - IN THE MATTER OF: AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board has issued an information request to Nova Scotia Power Inc. regarding its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals $702.1 million. The request asks for responses by February 13, 2026, and includes a list of specific projects for review.

Section 2
ment C0047278 - IT - Oracle MDM Upgrade Any additional projects reflected in ACE 2026 with a percentage change from the original approved project cost (first approval) greater than or equal to 30% 1. Please provide the initially approved p...

AI summary This document requests detailed information regarding the Oracle MDM Upgrade project and other projects with a cost change of 30% or more in ACE 2026. It asks for baseline costs, current costs, rate impacts, reasons for cost changes, and mitigation actions taken by NS Power.

Section 3
Power to contain costs and mitigate the increase in project costs and associated rate impacts. For each generation project included in the ACE 2026 having project total $5M and above, please provide: 1. The primary purpose of the project (...

AI summary The document requests detailed information on generation projects included in the ACE 2026 with a total cost of $5M or more, focusing on their purpose, cost, impact on rate base, and alignment with least-cost planning. It emphasizes the need for transparency in project evaluation and cost containment.

Section 4
6. The expected impact of the project on rate base and annual revenue requirement over the remaining and extended life of the asset. Reference: Exhibit N-1: Application - Section 8.0 Distribution 1. Please explain how Distribution capital...

AI summary The document requests detailed explanations and justifications related to NS Power's distribution capital planning, spending, and cost-containment measures. It focuses on linking capital planning to customer additions, benchmarking with other utilities, and implementing cost controls to manage rate base and revenue requirements.

Section 5
upgrades to ensure actual expenditures align with forecast benefits and least-cost obligations. Request IR-4: Reference: Exhibit N-1: Application - Section 9.0 (General Plant) (PDF Page 57) 1. General Plant capital for 2026 is forecast at...

AI summary The document outlines several requests for information regarding capital expenditures, cybersecurity, grid services, and hydro system investments. It asks for justifications for increased spending, confirms no ratepayer impact from a cyber attack, explains grid services and alternatives to synchronous condensers, and requests data on hydro system investments over the last ten years.

100705CA (NSPI) IR 1 to 32 - PDF 6 passages
1 M12619
1 M12619 2 3 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 4 5 6 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act 7 8 – and – 9 10 IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for approval of its 11 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan 12 13 14 1...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is handling an application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. The Consumer Advocate has requested information from NS Power, with responses due by February 13, 2026.

13 Request IR-3:
13 Request IR-3: 14 15 With respect to Appendix D, p. 21, does NS Power view it as necessary or helpful to revise the 16 summary of the capital work budget thresholds to reflect the Board's decision in M12417 that, 17 "NS Power is directed...

AI summary The document requests NS Power to consider revising the summary of capital work budget thresholds in Appendix D to align with the Board's decision in M12417, which requires NS Power to submit any future capital expenditures exceeding $1 million for Board approval, regardless of funding source.

22 Request IR-4:
22 Request IR-4: 23 24 With respect to Appendix D, p. 39, please provide NS Power's view on a revision to the definition 25 of a related project that would include CIs for like assets at a Steam/Gas Turbine or Hydro unit, 26 where like wou...

AI summary The document requests NS Power's perspective on revising the definition of a related project to include capital improvements (CIs) for like assets at Steam/Gas Turbine or Hydro units, where 'like' refers to units that can be substituted in normal business operations. The request includes a request for proposed language edits if NS Power finds the revision reasonable.

1 Request IR-8:
1 Request IR-8: 2 3 With respect to Section 10, please explain how the Project Delivery Model (PDM) is applied to 4 capital routine projects. If the PDM is not applied to capital routine projects, please provide a table 5 with the followin...

AI summary Request IR-8 asks for an explanation of how the Project Delivery Model (PDM) is applied to capital routine projects by NS Power, and if not, to provide a comparative table outlining equivalent practices and processes used for managing these projects.

26 Request IR-16:
26 Request IR-16: 29 27 28 With respect to projects C0070909, C0053234 and C0053214: 32 30 a) Please explain why there is no cost support reference for the cost of the C0070909 and 31 C0053234 transformers in the Capital Project Detailed E...

AI summary The document requests explanations and additional information regarding transformer costs and project details for three specific projects, including cost support references, firm quotes, contingency considerations, project schedules, risk matrices, and historical transformer data.

12 Request IR-20:
12 Request IR-20: 13 14 With respect to project C0080252 (Intelligent Asset Data Capture & Integration Platform): 15 16 a) Please provide a forecast of future costs to maintain and develop this platform. If no such 17 forecast is available...

AI summary The document requests Nova Scotia Power to provide details on the Intelligent Asset Data Capture & Integration Platform, including future costs, the federal funding agreement, potential risks, and clarification on a reference to 'ECC Renewable Dispatch Data.'

100706CA (NSPI) IR 1 to 32 - Word 8 passages
Section 1
M12619 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act – and – IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan INFORMATION REQUESTS To: Michael W...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate has submitted four information requests to Nova Scotia Power Inc. regarding its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, focusing on language clarification, scope changes, and alignment with Board decisions on capital expenditure thresholds.

Section 4
ing documentation. 5. If no decision has been made, please explain the process by which such a decision will be made, including dates for key milestones. Request IR-7: With respect to Figure 35: 1. Please provide actual (or forecast, for 2...

AI summary The document includes several requests for information regarding labor practices, overtime scheduling, and project management models. It asks for details on person-hours, overtime justification, contractor use, and the application of the Project Delivery Model (PDM) to capital routine projects.

Section 6
contracts (Attachments 1 and 2). If the contracts were competitively bid, please provide documentation of the selection process. If not, please explain how NS Power minimized cost. Request IR-12: With respect to C0080134 (TUC2 Stack), the...

AI summary The document contains several requests for information regarding procurement processes and cost considerations for various projects, including TUC2 Stack, TUC3 Ash Hauling, and CT-BGT2 Engine Refurbishment. Requests focus on competitive bidding, cost minimization, and evaluation documentation.

Section 7
how NS Power minimized cost. Request IR-15: With respect to Appendix I, CIs for transmission replacement and upgrade projects C0080110 and C0080109, and 2024 ACE Plan Rebuttal Evidence (p. 22):

AI summary The text refers to a request (IR-15) regarding how NS Power minimized cost, specifically in relation to transmission replacement and upgrade projects and the 2024 ACE Plan Rebuttal Evidence.

Section 9
decision in M12417, it stated that, “the Board remains concerned about the amount of contingency included in transmission line replacement and upgrade projects submitted for Board approval.” Please explain why it would be unreasonable for...

AI summary The Board has expressed concerns about the contingency amounts in transmission line projects and is requesting explanations and additional information regarding specific projects, including cost support references, firm quotes, and project schedules.

Section 11
1. Please provide support and context for the assertions that “it is not always possible to take an outage to L-6536” and that “Taking an outage to this line negatively impacts customer reliability in the area.” In your response, please ex...

AI summary The text consists of a series of questions directed at NS Power regarding transmission line outages, switch capabilities, replacement planning, contingency amounts, and cost justifications. It focuses on reliability impacts, switch types, replacement timelines, and cost estimation practices.

Section 12
. Please explain why the cost of the switches identified in Attachments 1 and 2 is not excluded from the 20 percent contingency amount, similar to the approach taken for C0053214. 8. Please explain why the transmission structure replacemen...

AI summary The text contains a series of requests for explanations and justifications regarding various projects, including cost support, procurement processes, outage data, and future costs. These requests focus on transparency, accountability, and the reasoning behind specific decisions and expenditures.

Section 20
1. Please provide a list of all post-project reviews conducted over the past 18 months and identify any that have previously been filed (e.g., in an ATO or in the 2024 ACE Plan proceeding). Please provide a copy of a sample comprising at l...

AI summary The request asks for a list of post-project reviews conducted by NS Power over the past 18 months, with a focus on those not previously filed, and how these reviews have contributed to continuous improvement. It also asks for examples of actionable findings from the reviews, including insights into project coordination, risk management, and staff response to challenges.

101094Letter SBA re: Not filing evidence 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
March 2, 2026 VIA EMAIL Ms. Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: M12619 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) has reviewed Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) and will not file evidence but will participate in the hearing. The SBA has also reviewed responses to information requests.

101193Letter NSPI re: Fourth Quarter 2025 Capital Reports 3 passages
Section 1 p. p. 0
March 11, 2026 Crystal Henwood Clerk of the Board Nova Scotia Energy Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: Fourth Quarter 2025 Capital Reports Dear Ms. Henwood: Capital Reports In this package are the 4th Quarter...

AI summary The document contains the Fourth Quarter 2025 capital reports submitted to the Nova Scotia Energy Board, detailing capital expenditures, active projects, deferred and cancelled projects, FIN reports, and unapproved spending. These reports are submitted in accordance with the 2016 ACE Plan and prior Board orders.

Section 2 p. p. 0
the 2016 ACE Plan stakeholder engagement process.) - Report 5 Q4 Requirement Only Unapproved Spending Report. This report includes all projects that have been removed from rate base per the conditions established and approved in the CEJC a...

AI summary The document discusses the 2016 ACE Plan's stakeholder engagement process and the requirement for an unapproved spending report. It outlines the conditions for removing projects from the rate base and includes the 2025 income statement impact. The report has been updated based on the Board's directives and reflects a new approval threshold of $1,000,000, effective October 30, 2019.

Section 3 p. p. 0
ided in M08013 – IR‐9 has been broken out into separate Report 6, described below. This report has been amended to reflect the new Board approval threshold of $1,000,000, effective October 30, 2019.) - Report 6 Q4 Requirement Only Unapprov...

AI summary The document outlines several reports related to capital expenditures and regulatory compliance, including unapproved spending over $1,000,000, capital write-offs, routine expenditures, carryover expenditures, and retirements. These reports are required under specific Board directives and updated thresholds effective October 30, 2019.

101260IG (Wilson-CA) IR-1 to IR-3 - PDF 3 passages
Preamble
1 2025 M12619 2 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 3 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act 4 IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) 5 for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual 6 Capital Ex...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is handling a proceeding involving an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan. A request has been made to John D. Wilson, the Consumer Advocate, regarding whether information in the 2025 Q4 Capital Report has altered his previous opinions on the matter.

Request IR-2:
Request IR-2: - Reference: Exhibit N-9, Evidence of John D. Wilson, page 11-12 - Preamble: Mr. Wilson observes that NSPI frequently applies a 15% contingency amount to - transmission line and transformer project budgets where no risk matri...

AI summary John D. Wilson suggests that NSPI should cap contingency amounts at 10% for transmission projects without a risk matrix. The Board is asked to assess the impact of this cap on the 2026 ACE Plan and whether other jurisdictions impose similar caps.

1 2 3 4 3. Whether or not NS Power has identified any new alternatives to the proposed project as a result of the information which led to the identified change; and, i
1 2 3 4 3. Whether or not NS Power has identified any new alternatives to the proposed project as a result of the information which led to the identified change; and, if so, a brief description of the alternative and a general statement as...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory questions regarding NS Power's identification of new project alternatives, potential revised applications, and the proposed two-step process for scope change notifications. It also seeks clarification on trigger thresholds and the uniform application of the process.

101261IG (Wilson-CA) IR-1 to IR-3 - Word 3 passages
Section 1
2025 M12619 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act IN THE MATTER OF: An Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its Annual Capital Expenditure (A...

AI summary This document pertains to an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284.0 million of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals $702.1 million, under the Public Utilities Act.

Section 3
Reference: Exhibit N-10, 2025 Q4 Capital Report Please advise whether any information contained in the filed 2025 Q4 Capital Report alters or affects Mr. Wilson’s opinions as previously expressed in this proceeding. If so, please: 1. Ident...

AI summary The document requests clarification on whether the 2025 Q4 Capital Report affects Mr. Wilson’s prior opinions and seeks his views on capping contingency amounts at 10% for NSPI projects lacking risk matrices, including its impact on the 2026 ACE Plan and whether other jurisdictions impose similar caps.

Section 5
was not selected. 4. Whether or not NS Power intends to file a revised capital project application or ATO application prior to proceeding with project construction or implementation (as applicable). Second, the Board, on its own or in resp...

AI summary The document outlines questions for NS Power regarding its intentions to file revised applications and the specifics of a proposed two-step process for scope changes in the CEJC. It also asks for clarification on trigger thresholds, certainty of budget increases, and the uniform application of the process.

101609Letter from the Office of the Minister of Energy 1 passage
Section 2 p. p. 0
best value for ratepayers. In summary, the Minister asks the Board to uphold competitive procurements as default for any new energy or capacity resources, as well as transmission ancillary services. The Board should consider this interim g...

AI summary The Minister requests the Board to uphold competitive procurements as the default for new energy or capacity resources and transmission ancillary services, ensuring consistency with the IESO's responsibilities and protecting ratepayers.

101633Email from NSPI re refiled 2025 Q4 R8 Capital Reports 2 passages
Section 1 p. p. 0
From: [Sofia Reiner](mailto:[email protected]) To: [Henwood, Crystal D](mailto:[email protected]) Cc: [Carley Freeman;](mailto:[email protected]) [Henwood, Crystal D](mailto:[email protected]); [Currie...

AI summary An email from Sofia Reiner of NS Power to Crystal Henwood of Nova Scotia, informing her that NS Power has uploaded revised documents related to the 2025 Q4 Capital Report for the referenced matter via the Board's secure file transfer service.

Section 2 p. p. 0
èce jointe ou cliquez sur un lien Ms. Henwood: Please note that NS Power has uploaded the following documents in relation to the matter referenced above via the Board's secure file transfer service: - 2025 Q4 R8 Refile PDF - 2025 Q4 R8 Ref...

AI summary NS Power has uploaded corrected versions of its 2025 Q4 Capital Reports via the Board's secure file transfer service. The correction includes the addition of actuals for the WAM Enhancement Routine in the Computing Asset Management section. The contact for this matter is Lana Myatt.

101714Undertaking List 1 passage
Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan - $284 million p. p. 0
Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan - $284 million DATE: UND# DESCRIPTION REQUESTED OF BY DATE DUE April 21, 2026 U-1 To advise what the phrase, "Transactions per labour hour" refers to in the report on the...

AI summary The document outlines five requests for information related to Nova Scotia Power Inc.'s 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, including queries about terminology, cost allocation, service availability, project updates, and directives from the Minister.

102198Closing Submissions - CA 5 passages
1 2 p. pp. 0-1
1 2 M12619 3 4 5 6 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 7 8 9 IN THE MATTER OF: The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c. 380 10 -and - 11 12 13 14 15 16 IN THE MATTER OF: an application by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS POWER) for approval of a...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate submits closing remarks regarding NS Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan, noting no objections to specific projects but highlighting cost minimization opportunities in distribution routines and reliability plan projects, as identified by expert John Wilson.

Preamble p. p. 1
- NS Power does not adequately track person-hours and overtime across many routines;[4](#page-1-0) and - NS Power does not use a Basis of Schedule (or equivalent) for many routine projects that are not reactive in nature[.](#page-1-2) 5 Mr...

AI summary The text highlights deficiencies in NS Power's tracking of person-hours and overtime, and its lack of a Basis of Schedule for non-reactive projects. Mr. Wilson suggests these deficiencies may result in increased costs and inefficiencies and recommends improvements in reporting and scheduling practices.

Projects Without Risk Matrices p. pp. 4-5
Projects Without Risk Matrices In his report, Mr. Wilson notes that NS Power routinely includes a 15% contingency in transmission line and transformer project budgets where no risk matrix is prepared. He recommends the following: I recomme...

AI summary Mr. Wilson recommends reducing the contingency amount for projects without a risk matrix from 15% to 10%, and requiring a risk matrix for any contingency over 10%. NS Power argues that the routine nature of the projects and known risks justify the current contingency level.

CEJC p. p. 7
CEJC Mr. Wilson's report addresses a number of issues concerning the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). In this regard, Mr. Wilson recommends the following: - Accept NS Power's clarification to the definition of "scope chan...

AI summary The document discusses recommendations for revising the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC), including clarifying 'scope change' and applying the $1 million threshold regardless of funding source. NS Power agrees with some revisions but opposes others, citing existing legislation. The Consumer Advocate supports the recommendations, arguing they align with the Board's prior decisions.

Conclusion p. p. 8
Conclusion In summary, the Consumer Advocate does not oppose approval of NS Power's proposed 2026 capital projects, but supports the various recommendations made by Mr. Wilson as described above. The Consumer Advocate would further reitera...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate supports the approval of NS Power's 2026 capital projects but emphasizes concerns regarding the reliability plan and cost-effectiveness of distribution routines, intending to explore these further in a third-party study.

102201Closing Submissions - SBA 1 passage
BEFORE THE NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
BEFORE THE NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380 as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of its 2026 ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (A...

AI summary The Small Business Advocate (SBA) provides closing submissions regarding Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, emphasizing the need for investments in resiliency and reliability while considering the impact on ratepayers. The SBA highlights the importance of vegetation management and its increasing cost.

102208Closing Submissions - DOE 19 passages
1 BEFORE THE p. p. 2
1 BEFORE THE 2 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 3 4 5 IN THE MATTER OF Section 35A of the Public Utilities Act, RSNS 1989, c 380, as amended 6 -and - 7 8 IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for Approval of...

AI summary This document is the closing statement by the Department of Energy, Government of Nova Scotia, in the matter of NS Power's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan (ACE Plan) application. It is part of a regulatory proceeding under Section 35A of the Public Utilities Act.

Preamble p. p. 2
- These are the closing submissions of the Department of Energy, Government of Nova Scotia (the - "Department") regarding Nova Scotia Power Incorporated's ("NS Power", "NSP" or the "Utility") - 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan Ap...

AI summary The Department of Energy supports NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan but emphasizes the need for ratepayer affordability and cost-containment. Concerns are raised about the growing capital intensity and the need for comprehensive least-cost planning to ensure expenditures align with customer benefits and asset prudency.

Standard of Review p. p. 2
Standard of Review - Under Section 35A of the Public Utilities Act , the legal burden of proof rests with the public utility. - NS Power is required to establish that its proposed expenditures are prudent, necessary, and - aligned with Lea...

AI summary The standard of review under the Public Utilities Act places the burden of proof on NS Power to justify expenditures as prudent, necessary, and aligned with Least-Cost Utility Planning. The Board must apply heightened scrutiny due to affordability concerns, ensuring investments are justified with verifiable evidence and avoid cost overruns.

Historic Capital Investment Trend vs. Physical System Contribution p. p. 2
Historic Capital Investment Trend vs. Physical System Contribution - An empirical review of NS Power's historical capital spending from 2005 through the 2030 forecast - illustrates a significant, compounding upward trajectory. The historic...

AI summary The document examines Nova Scotia Power's historical capital spending from 2005 to the 2030 forecast, highlighting a significant upward trend in investment that has outpaced provincial economic indicators.

A. The Acceleration of Capital Spending p. p. 2
A. The Acceleration of Capital Spending - Based on historical ACE Plans from 2005 to 2024[1](#page-2-0) and forecasts up to 2030, NSPI has engaged in a sustained acceleration of capital deployment. During the 2005–2008 period, the annual a...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power has significantly increased its capital spending from $126M annually in 2005–2008 to a projected $700M annually by 2026–2030. This acceleration raises concerns about the long-term sustainability of the rate base and the ability of ratepayers to absorb the financial burden of these investments.

B. Asset Growth vs. Declining Generation & Stagnant Capacity p. pp. 2-5
B. Asset Growth vs. Declining Generation & Stagnant Capacity The most significant concern regarding NS Power's long-term capital strategy is the apparent divergence between growth in the utility's asset base and the underlying evolution of...

AI summary The document highlights a growing mismatch between NS Power's asset growth and declining generation capacity and stagnant energy sales. Key indicators show a significant drop in internal generation contribution and capacity utilization, while total assets have grown steadily. This raises concerns about whether ratepayers are receiving value for these investments and suggests the need for better alignment between capital expenditures and actual system needs.

14 Audit of the Fixed Asset Register p. p. 5
14 Audit of the Fixed Asset Register 5 13 Pursuant to the Board's mandate under the Public Utilities Act to exercise general supervision over public utilities, and its responsibility to ensure that the approved rate base reflects assets th...

AI summary The Department recommends an independent audit of NSPI's Fixed Asset Register to ensure alignment between financial records and physical assets, under the Public Utilities Act . This follows concerns about discrepancies between capital investment growth and system indicators, and to ensure rate base accuracy and prudence of expenditures.

13 Reliability Investment vs. Performance Achievements p. pp. 5-6
13 Reliability Investment vs. Performance Achievements NSPI has consistently identified system reliability as a key driver supporting significant capital investment requirements, including forecast expenditures of approximately $1.3 billio...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) has invested heavily in grid reliability, yet has not consistently met performance targets. The document highlights a 'Reliability Gap' where capital expenditures have not directly translated into improved system performance, suggesting a need for better performance monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.

Cumulative Ratepayer Impact p. pp. 6-7
Cumulative Ratepayer Impact A key consideration in assessing long-term regulatory prudence is the cumulative impact of utility investment decisions on customer affordability. Over the past two decades, NSPI's capital investment program has...

AI summary The document discusses the cumulative impact of NSPI's capital investments on electricity rates and affordability over the past 20 years. Despite limited growth in transmission infrastructure and generation capacity, average customer rates have increased significantly. The Department urges the Board to evaluate the affordability and value of future capital expenditures.

Review of High-Escalation Capital Projects p. p. 7
Review of High-Escalation Capital Projects - The Department has reviewed all ACE 2026 projects with escalation levels of 50% or greater - compared to historical ACE project costs (see Appendix A ) for the analysis in the following - sectio...

AI summary The Department has reviewed all ACE 2026 projects with escalation levels of 50% or greater compared to historical ACE project costs, as detailed in Appendix A.

Capital Escalation Trends Across the Portfolio p. pp. 7-8
Capital Escalation Trends Across the Portfolio - The evidence demonstrates that material project escalation is not limited to isolated projects or - unique operational circumstances but instead reflects a broader and recurring pattern acro...

AI summary The analysis highlights systemic capital project cost escalations across Nova Scotia Power's portfolio, exceeding normal inflation and supply-chain impacts. These increases are attributed to expanded project scopes, evolving definitions, and immature cost estimates, raising prudence concerns about governance, cost estimation, and the value of incremental spending.

Portfolio-Wide Findings p. p. 8
Portfolio-Wide Findings - A review covering indicative projects with escalation levels of 50% or greater relative to prior approved or historical project values reveals several recurring themes: - Systemic Escalation: Cost growth is system...

AI summary A review of projects with cost escalations of 50% or more reveals systemic cost growth across Distribution, Generation, Transmission, Hydro, and General Plant portfolios. Projects show divergence from baseline cost drivers and have evolved into broader resiliency and modernization programs. Software and technology initiatives, along with large capital projects, require closer scrutiny.

Distribution p. p. 8
Distribution The Distribution portfolio demonstrates some of the most significant cumulative escalation levels within the reviewed sample. Of particular concern is the extent to which routine and recurring - programs have expanded into ver...

AI summary The Distribution portfolio shows significant capital expenditure increases without clear justification related to customer growth or reliability outcomes. Items such as Provincial Distribution ROW and New Customers Residential Routine have seen massive escalations, raising concerns about prudence, forecasting assumptions, and the classification of expenses as capital versus operating costs.

Generation Projects p. p. 8
Generation Projects - The Generation portfolio demonstrates repeated instances where projects originally scoped as - component replacement or targeted refurbishment initiatives evolved into materially larger capital - programs. - TUC Shore...

AI summary The Generation Projects section highlights significant cost escalations in several Nova Scotia Power initiatives, indicating major scope changes from initial plans. Projects such as TUC Shoreline Sheetpile Refurbishment and HYD Marshall Falls Dam Refurbishment saw increases of over 1490% and 114%, respectively, raising concerns about project management and initial cost forecasting.

General Plant Projects p. p. 8
General Plant Projects - The General Plant portfolio demonstrates significant escalation within enterprise technology, operational systems, cybersecurity, and fleet-related investments. Several projects suggest a transition from discrete s...

AI summary The General Plant portfolio shows substantial increases in enterprise technology, cybersecurity, and fleet investments. Projects like work vehicle replacement, IT upgrades, and cybersecurity initiatives have seen significant escalations, raising concerns about justification, governance, and the alignment of these expenditures with rate-base considerations.

Cyber Security Incident related costs p. p. 8
Cyber Security Incident related costs - The 2026 ACE Plan includes significant capital requests for enterprise systems, Customer - Information System (CIS) replacement and the IT-OT Cyber Security Control implementation. As - established d...

AI summary The 2025 ransomware incident exposed vulnerabilities in Nova Scotia Power's legacy systems, leading to billing inaccuracies and data compromises. The 2026 ACE Plan includes capital requests for system replacements, but the Department argues these costs should not be recovered from ratepayers, as they were already funded through existing rates, and should instead be covered by insurance or absorbed by shareholders.

Request to the Board p. p. 8
Request to the Board - The review of projects contained in Appendix A representing projects with escalation levels of - 50% or greater indicates significant increases across Generation, Transmission, Distribution, - Hydro, and General Plan...

AI summary The document requests the Board to conduct enhanced scrutiny of projects with significant cost escalations across various categories. It argues that these increases are not solely due to external factors but reflect broader issues like scope expansion and misclassification of expenses. The Department recommends procedural reviews to ensure proper governance and ratepayer protection.

Conclusion & Requested Board Actions p. pp. 8-15
Conclusion & Requested Board Actions - At a time when affordability pressures facing Nova Scotian households remain significant, the Board's oversight role becomes increasingly important. The Department therefore respectfully submits that...

AI summary The Department requests the Board to implement structural measures for the 2026 ACE Plan, including capping the ACE envelope, auditing the Fixed Asset Register, enforcing reliability performance accountability, and applying prudence reviews. These actions aim to ensure affordability, prudence, and alignment with public interest.

Appendix A: 2026 ACE Projects with escalation 50% or greater and Project Total >=1 Million p. p. 15
Appendix A: 2026 ACE Projects with escalation 50% or greater and Project Total >=1 Million CI# Project # Project Long Title ACE Category 2026 ACE Project Total ACE Year Past Project Total % Escalation 39766 D061 New Customers Residential R...

AI summary Appendix A lists 2026 ACE Projects with escalation rates of 50% or greater and project totals of at least $1 million. These projects include distribution, generation, and transmission upgrades, with significant cost escalations compared to past project totals.

102213Closing Submissions - IG 20 passages
Delivered by E-mail p. p. 0
Delivered by E-mail Crystal Henwood Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Energy Board 3rd Floor, 1601 Lower Water Street PO Box 1692, Unit "M" Halifax NS B3J 3S3 Dear Ms. Henwood: Re: M12619 – NSPI – 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure...

AI summary The Industrial Group has submitted closing comments on NSPI's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, expressing concerns about the increasing capital spending and the need for greater transparency and regulatory oversight. They highlight the need for updated reliability plans, improvements to capital expenditure justification criteria, and enhanced reporting on routine capital spending.

1. Five-Year Reliability Plan: Year 2 Updates p. pp. 0-2
1. Five-Year Reliability Plan: Year 2 Updates Within the last ACE Plan proceeding, the Board directed NSPI to provide annual updates on the progress of its Reliability Plan[.](#page-1-0) 4 Accordingly, NSPI has filed its Reliability Plan -...

AI summary The document discusses the lack of updates or changes to NSPI's Five-Year Reliability Plan, despite the Board's directive for annual progress reports. NSPI claims no new information necessitated changes, but critics argue that no robust evaluation was conducted to assess the Plan's effectiveness or justify its static investment approach.

The Actual 2025 Spend confirmed in Undertaking U-5 p. pp. 2-3
The Actual 2025 Spend confirmed in Undertaking U-5 In 2025, the first year of the Reliability Plan, the investment level was $206 million. NSPI confirmed that it did, in fact, invest the $206 million both within the Update,[11](#page-2-8)...

AI summary In 2025, NSPI confirmed it invested $206 million as part of the Reliability Plan, but the actual spend was $179.4 million, an underspend of over $17.2 million and a total variance of about $26.6 million from the planned amount. This discrepancy is discussed in the context of the 2025 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan and the response to Undertaking U-5.

2. CEJC "Scope Change" Definition Must Allow for Meaningful Board Oversight Background p. pp. 3-5
2. CEJC "Scope Change" Definition Must Allow for Meaningful Board Oversight Background Scope Change applications were separated from Authorization to Overspend (" ATO" ) applications as part of the 2017 ACE Plan proceeding, Matter M08278,...

AI summary The document discusses the separation of Scope Change applications from Authorization to Overspend (ATO) applications within the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) as part of the 2017 ACE Plan proceeding. The Board emphasized the need for distinct oversight of Scope Change applications, which can occur independently of overspend, and provided an example of a project approved without associated overspend.

Meaning of "Scope" and "Scope Change" p. pp. 5-6
Meaning of "Scope" and "Scope Change" Quite simply, the Industrial Group states that NSPI ought to be guided by the project scope definition or scope statement created at the beginning of a project, to determine when or if a Scope Change a...

AI summary The Industrial Group argues that NSPI should use the initial project scope definition to determine if a Scope Change application is needed. The document references the PMBOK definition of project scope and notes that NSPI has historically included asset quantity in its scope definition, which differs from the PMBOK approach. NSPI, however, uses PMBOK as a guide for project management and cost minimization.

The Proposed Definition Renders the Provision Meaningless p. pp. 6-8
The Proposed Definition Renders the Provision Meaningless NSPI itself testified that changes in "intent" that would trigger a scope change application would be "quite rare"[23](#page-7-0) and that NSPI "very, very rarely"[24](#page-7-2) de...

AI summary The proposed definition of scope change in the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC) is criticized for being too broad, potentially eliminating meaningful oversight. NSPI testified that scope changes are rare and that it rarely deviates from project intent once filed, suggesting the new definition may render the provision ineffective.

The Definition Should Be Consistent with NSPI's Established Practice p. pp. 8-10
The Definition Should Be Consistent with NSPI's Established Practice The Industrial Group submits that an artificial definition and application of "scope" and "scope change" should be avoided. The CEJC should be reflective of the overall p...

AI summary The Industrial Group argues that the definition of 'scope' and 'scope change' in the CEJC should align with NSPI's current project management practices. They reference examples from the ACE Plan and CI applications, including the Point Aconi Boiler Refurbishment 2026, to demonstrate NSPI's established approach to project scope descriptions.

3. A 70% Increase in Routine Capital Spending is Inconsistent with "Routine" p. p. 10
3. A 70% Increase in Routine Capital Spending is Inconsistent with "Routine"

AI summary This section argues that a 70% increase in routine capital spending is inconsistent with the term 'routine,' suggesting that such a significant increase may not align with standard or typical capital expenditure practices.

Routine Expenditures p. pp. 10-11
Routine Expenditures The CEJC defines Routines at s. 15.2 as including: - Replacement of worn out or technologically deficient stand-alone equipment. - Additions/improvements to existing capital assets to raise or improve productivity leve...

AI summary The Routine Expenditures Program provides annual funding for recurring, like-for-like capital replacements and enhancements. Routine capital is defined as expenditures to sustain NS Power's equipment and accommodate system growth and customer additions. This aligns with the CEJC and has been accepted by NSPI.

The Trend of Increased Spending p. pp. 11-12
The Trend of Increased Spending Against the CEJC definition of Routine Expenditures, the trend of significant increase in spending is problematic. As outlined in N-20, Routine Spending 2023-2026-IG, NSPI has increased its Program spending...

AI summary The document highlights a significant increase in Program spending by Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI), rising by $90 million, or 70%, over the last four years. NSPI attributes this increase to factors such as right-of-way widening, new customer routines, utility-specific inflation, and the addition of new routines. This spending trend is being evaluated against the Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC).

No Robust Routine Program-Level Review p. pp. 12-13
No Robust Routine Program-Level Review There is no distinct "routine review process" separate from NSPI's general capital scrutiny.[47](#page-13-0) NSPI relies on the same review process of any capital expenditure, and relies on the ACE pr...

AI summary The text discusses the lack of a distinct routine program-level review process for capital expenditures by NSPI, highlighting concerns about cost minimization, lack of monitoring for cost creep, and insufficient oversight of routine capital programs. It suggests that the Board should require NSPI to file detailed program-by-program reviews and establish a CEJC materiality trigger for routine capital growth.

4. Capital Spending Is Significantly Higher with no review of Rate Impacts p. p. 13
4. Capital Spending Is Significantly Higher with no review of Rate Impacts

AI summary This section highlights that capital spending is significantly higher without a review of its impact on rates, raising concerns about the financial implications for customers and the regulatory process.

The Sustained Increase p. pp. 13-14
The Sustained Increase The 2026 capital budget of $702.1 million represents a sustained annual increase of $200 million over the five-year average. As the Department of Energy observed in its opening statement, capital expenditures have gr...

AI summary The 2026 capital budget of $702.1 million reflects a sustained annual increase of $200 million over the five-year average, growing from approximately $126 million between 2005–2008 to $700 million, a 458% increase. The Department of Energy questions whether this trajectory delivers proportional benefits for ratepayers, while the Industrial Group calls for a holistic rate-impact analysis.

No Rate Impact or Affordability Analysis p. pp. 14-16
No Rate Impact or Affordability Analysis NSPI confirmed that when developing its capital program, "specific rate impacts are not calculated" at the program level.[57](#page-15-0) Instead, rate impacts related to the capital program are sai...

AI summary NSPI stated that rate impacts are not calculated at the program level but included in the GRA. Affordability considerations are addressed at the individual asset level and through the GRA process. However, there is no evidence of a rate impact assessment or affordability analysis for the Reliability Plan or its Year 2 implementation.

A Direction for Comprehensive Reporting Is Warranted p. p. 16
A Direction for Comprehensive Reporting Is Warranted The Industrial Group submits that the Board should direct NSPI to file, alongside each future ACE Plan, a ratepayer cost exposure reporting that includes: - NSPI's ACE capital program (a...

AI summary The Industrial Group recommends that the Board require NSPI to provide detailed ratepayer cost exposure reports with each future ACE Plan, including capital programs, reliability intertie costs, and anticipated costs from IESO-NS, along with plain-language summaries of bill impacts.

The Identity and Access Management Project Illustrates the Problem p. pp. 16-17
The Identity and Access Management Project Illustrates the Problem NSPI confirmed that the Identity and Access Management (" IAM ") project was delayed following the cyber incident.[68](#page-17-0) The 2025 ACE Plan estimated this project...

AI summary The Identity and Access Management (IAM) project, initially estimated at $1.2 million in the 2025 ACE Plan, has seen its cost increase to $6.7 million due to delays caused by a cyber incident. NSPI claims the incident did not impact the cost increase, but the Industrial Group argues this position is not adequately supported.

Recommended Direction p. pp. 17-18
Recommended Direction The Industrial Group submits that the Board should direct NSPI to include, in every subsequent submittal for IT or cybersecurity-related projects that were deferred or delayed as a result of the 2025 cyber incident: t...

AI summary The Industrial Group recommends that NSPI include detailed cost information in future submittals for IT or cybersecurity projects affected by the 2025 cyber incident. NSPI claims no restoration costs were captured in capital projects, but the Industrial Group argues that this information would help the Board ensure prudence and transparency in cost recovery.

6. The IESO-NS Transition Should include Coordination on Capital Planning p. p. 18
6. The IESO-NS Transition Should include Coordination on Capital Planning

AI summary This section emphasizes the need for coordination on capital planning during the transition to the Independent Electricity System Operator - Nova Scotia (IESO-NS). It highlights the importance of aligning capital expenditure strategies with regulatory frameworks and oversight mechanisms.

The Risk of Duplication and Misalignment p. pp. 19-20
The Risk of Duplication and Misalignment If IESO-NS is now leading, or expected to lead, system planning through the IRP process, capital planning decisions should logically depend on those system planning outcomes. Without consultation or...

AI summary The text highlights concerns about duplication and misalignment in capital planning between NSPI and IESO-NS, especially regarding the 2026 ACE Plan and the Synchronous Condensers project. It emphasizes the need for coordination and integrated planning to avoid unnecessary costs and ensure alignment with updated IRP outcomes.

CONCLUSION p. p. 20
CONCLUSION The Industrial Group respectfully requests that the Board: - 1. Direct NSPI to provide a more complete Year 3 update to the Five-Year Reliability Plan, including a reconciliation of planned versus actual spending, an explanation...

AI summary The Industrial Group requests the Board to direct NSPI to provide more detailed updates to the Five-Year Reliability Plan, revise the Scope Change definition, enhance cost-variance disclosure, and improve stakeholder engagement and coordination with IESO-NS in future filings.

102222Closing Submissions - NSPI 10 passages
Nova Scotia Energy Board p. p. 2
Nova Scotia Energy Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for Approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (M12619)...

AI summary This document is the closing submission by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for the approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, filed under the Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended.

Preamble p. pp. 2-20
- Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power, Company) seeks approval from the Nova Scotia - Energy Board (NSEB, Board) of the Company's 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan - filed with the Board on December 12, 2025 pursuant to secti...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) is seeking approval from the Nova Scotia Energy Board (NSEB) for its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which includes investments of $284 million to improve grid reliability and reduce outages through vegetation management, infrastructure upgrades, and storm hardening.

2.0 CAPITAL PLANNING NS Power employs a centralized capital planning governance structure that reviews and approves project proposals to ensure all ACE Plan investments are fully justified, strategically aligned, and deliver maximum customer benefit. This annual planning cycle typically begins early in the preceding year and culminates in the ACE Plan filing with the NSEB. NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan is designed to fulfill the Company's statutory obligation under the Public Utilities Act to provide safe and adequate service. The Plan is the product of a comprehensive capital planning framework anchored in the NSEB-approved Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC). The CEJC establishes a structured rating system under which each project is assessed across Justification Criteria, and a numeric Risk Rating derived from multiplying asset Criticality (1-5) by Condition (1-5), yielding priority scores ranging from 1-25. This framework provides thorough oversight, ensuring that all investment decisions are grounded in evidence and aligned with the Company's obligation to deliver safe, adequate, and reliable service. NS Power's bottom-up risk-based planning approach directly supports this obligation by ensuring that capital investment decisions are driven by asset condition and risk, rather than predetermined spending targets. As stated in NS Power's response to NSEB IR-2(c): The multi-year forecast was developed, similar to all current year forecasts, utilizing a bottom up approach, based on the asset management mechanism […] No constraints are put on this process during the development of the plan to ensure NS Power is solely focusing on a risk based approach to asset investment. [10](#page-4-1) The 2026 ACE Plan forecasts were developed from asset-specific risk assessments considering both criticality and condition to determine the overall risk rating. This bottom-up approach ensures that investment flows to areas of genuine need, and addresses concerns about simply "filling an p. pp. 3-5
2.0 CAPITAL PLANNING NS Power employs a centralized capital planning governance structure that reviews and approves project proposals to ensure all ACE Plan investments are fully justified, strategically aligned, and deliver maximum custom...

AI summary NS Power uses a centralized capital planning process to ensure ACE Plan investments are justified and aligned with customer needs. The 2026 ACE Plan is developed using a risk-based approach, guided by the NSEB-approved Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria (CEJC), which evaluates projects based on asset criticality and condition to determine investment priorities.

3.0 CAPITAL PROJECTS NS Power wishes to address the following specific topics / projects directly that generated important discussion at the hearing: 1. Maximo Salesforce and WAM Reporting; 2. CI C0021608 TUC Shoreline Sheetpile Refurbishment; 3. CI C0080135 – CT-BGT2 Engine Refurbishment; and 4. CI C0080266 – New Distribution Right of Way Phase 11 Each are addressed in turn below. 3.1 Maximo Salesforce and WAM CI 46075 – IT – T&D WAM Phase 2: Work Management and Scheduling & Dispatch was approved by the Board on July 4, 2022 (M10400), with a directive to provide annual reporting to the Board and stakeholders on the realization of project benefits following completion, as well as a final report in late 2027 or early 2028. In accordance with this directive, NS Power submitted its first annual benefits report on May 2, 2025 (M12253) and is currently preparing its second annual report. With respect to Recommendations 1 and 2 of the Wilson Evidence, the activities contemplated are already addressed through the Company's existing WAM benefits reporting and ongoing operational practices. For Recommendation 1, which proposes that NS Power estimate how quantified benefits apply to specific capital projects and operating expense categories, the current annual reporting for the Work Management and Scheduling and Dispatch project already quantifies the benefits associated with the in-scope work types. These benefits arise at a system and program level rather than being p. pp. 5-7
3.0 CAPITAL PROJECTS NS Power wishes to address the following specific topics / projects directly that generated important discussion at the hearing: 1. Maximo Salesforce and WAM Reporting; 2. CI C0021608 TUC Shoreline Sheetpile Refurbishm...

AI summary NS Power is addressing several capital projects, including the Maximo Salesforce and WAM reporting, and the Tufts Cove Shoreline Sheetpile Refurbishment. The WAM project was approved with requirements for annual reporting, and NS Power has submitted its first report. The Tufts Cove project involves refurbishing a deteriorated sheetpile structure to prevent coastal erosion and protect the shoreline.

Condition Assessment and Engineering Review A condition assessment conducted by CBCL in October 2022 confirmed that remediation was required to maintain the structural integrity of the shoreline sheetpile. CBCL recommended that remediation be undertaken as soon as feasible to avoid potential shoreline failure and to mitigate the risk of an environmental incident, particularly given the presence of fuel lines located on top of the existing structures. In early 2023, CBCL completed a preliminary design options analysis and identified three potential approaches: (1) combi-wall (2) concrete retaining wall and partial cell encapsulation, and (3) rock revetment.[13](#page-8-0) Ultimately, CBCL ranked the rock revetment option highest based on design criteria, operational impacts, regulatory considerations, and cost. This option is also comparatively simple from a constructability perspective, as it avoids the need to drill king piles into bedrock and minimizes disruption to the existing shoreline and seabed. In addition, the rock revetment has an estimated 50-year service life and lower ongoing maintenance requirements. Assessment of Alternatives NS Power conducted its own review of CBCL's analysis with internal subject matter experts. Through this process, it was determined that the viable options were limited to the combi-wall and rock revetment alternatives. The concrete retaining wall and partial encapsulation option was effectively ruled out immediately as it would rely on the current structural integrity of the existing cells and would not provide any structural capacity to resist lateral loads. [14](#page-8-1) In essence, this option would primarily serve to slow further corrosion of the already deteriorated shoreline sheet pile cells. Given that the majority of p. pp. 7-9
. Given that the majority of the existing wall is in critical condition, with thickness losses of up to 60% and areas of complete DATE FILED: May 29, 2026 Page 9 of 23 Exhibit N-1, NS Power 2026 ACE Plan, G03 C0021608, PDF page 153 of 782....

AI summary A condition assessment identified critical damage to a shoreline sheetpile requiring remediation to prevent failure. Three options were evaluated, with rock revetment being the preferred choice. However, a geotechnical survey revealed less favorable conditions than initially assumed, increasing the complexity and cost of the combi-wall option, leading to its rejection.

3.4 CI C0080266 New Distribution Right of Way Phase 11 p. pp. 12-13
3.4 CI C0080266 New Distribution Right of Way Phase 11 The New Distribution Right of Way program establishes new rights-of-way, providing 6 meters of clearance, wherever feasible, for distribution feeders where rights-of-way had not previo...

AI summary The New Distribution Right of Way program establishes new rights-of-way with 6 meters of clearance for distribution feeders where they previously did not exist, targeting circuits with ineffective vegetation management. Once established, these rights-of-way become long-lived assets managed through ongoing tree-trimming programs. The classification of this work as capital has been reviewed and aligns with standard accounting practices.

Project Justification and Cost p. p. 13
Project Justification and Cost Phase 11 continues the New Distribution Right of Way program, which has been consistently approved by the Board and remains a cornerstone of the Five-Year Reliability Plan's vegetation management strategy. Th...

AI summary Phase 11 of the New Distribution Right of Way program is part of the Five-Year Reliability Plan's vegetation management strategy. The unit cost of $43,200 per kilometer reflects NS Power's forecast, influenced by higher contractor operating costs and an expanded scope of work, including the removal of hazard trees outside the defined right-of-way edge.

4.0 REPORTING ON TREE CONTACTS p. p. 15
% estimate reflects the collective judgment of experienced field operations and vegetation - management professionals, based on their knowledge of how these events present in practice.[33](#page-15-3) - Second, the record provides importan...

AI summary The text discusses the interpretation of vegetation proxy data in the context of the 2026 ACE Plan, noting that Tree Contacts are excluded from certain figures and that the 40% proxy is used separately in Appendix G, Figure 2. It references NS Power's Rebuttal Evidence and hearing transcripts.

5.0 EFFECTIVENESS OF RELIABILITY INVESTMENTS p. pp. 16-18
5.0 EFFECTIVENESS OF RELIABILITY INVESTMENTS Consistent with the 2026 ACE Plan proceeding, it is important to emphasize that NS Power's reliability investments are effective and are delivering measurable reliability improvements for custom...

AI summary NS Power emphasizes the effectiveness of its reliability investments, citing measurable improvements in reliability metrics and the use of a robust evaluation framework. The Company highlights the importance of using both lagging and leading indicators to assess performance and manage risks proactively. It also notes the potential for changes to performance standards and how the Five-Year Reliability Plan may need to be adjusted accordingly.

7.0 CONCLUSION p. pp. 20-22
7.0 CONCLUSION - Consistent with prior ACE Plans, NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan reflects the Company's focus on - providing customers with safe and reliable electrical service in the most cost-effective manner - possible. NS Power is confident...

AI summary NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan aligns with prior plans and emphasizes cost-effective, reliable service. The company asserts that its responses to information requests, rebuttal evidence, and hearing inputs address the Wilson Evidence and provide the NSEB with necessary information to approve the plan. NS Power requests the Board's approval of the plan and revised CEJC.

102294Reply to Closing Submissions - NSPI 19 passages
Nova Scotia Energy Board p. p. 2
Nova Scotia Energy Board IN THE MATTER OF The Public Utilities Act, R.S.N.S. 1989, c.380, as amended - and - IN THE MATTER OF an Application by Nova Scotia Power Inc. for Approval of the 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan (M12619)...

AI summary This document is a non-confidential reply by Nova Scotia Power Inc. to closing submissions regarding its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which is under review by the Nova Scotia Energy Board under the Public Utilities Act.

Preamble p. pp. 3-11
The IG does not take a position on any of the individual capital projects but requests that the Board: 1. Direct NSPI to provide a more complete Year 3 update to the Five-Year Reliability Plan; 2. Decline to approve NSPI's proposed Scope C...

AI summary The IG requests several actions from the Board regarding NSPI's capital projects, including updates to the Reliability Plan, revised definitions for Scope Change, and enhanced stakeholder engagement. NS Power opposes these requests, arguing they are unnecessary under the current regulatory framework.

2.1.1 Actual 2025 Spend p. p. 4
2.1.1 Actual 2025 Spend The IG points to Undertaking U-5 and submits that there is a contradiction to the claim that NS Power invested $206 million in Year 1, as actual expenditures were approximately $179.4 million, about $26.6 million be...

AI summary The Intervenor Group (IG) challenges NS Power's claim that $206 million was invested in 2025, citing actual expenditures of $179.4 million. NS Power explains the discrepancy by pointing to project delays, unplanned work, and regulatory changes, arguing that adjustments are normal and necessary for effective asset management and reliability planning.

2.2.1 Application Timing p. p. 6
2.2.1 Application Timing The IG states at page 10: More to the point, NSPI seeks approval to overspend only after the funds are committed and the size of the overrun is known. A Scope Change application is prospective so the Board has some...

AI summary The IG argues that NSPI's approach to filing ATO applications after overspending occurs lacks advance oversight. NS Power explains that timely filing is crucial to avoid financial consequences, such as costs being removed from rate base until regulatory approval is obtained, which limits cost recovery during delays.

2.2.2 Scope & Scope Change Definition p. pp. 6-9
2.2.2 Scope & Scope Change Definition The IG states: A change in scope could be to deliverables, methods, boundaries and/or objectives in the project. However, the trigger for when a formal application is required can, and should, be more...

AI summary The IG argues that changes in project scope, such as deliverables, methods, boundaries, or objectives, should trigger formal applications. NS Power disagrees, asserting that only changes to deliverables can be objectively measured and that existing processes like ATO and Final Cost reviews provide sufficient oversight without creating new administrative burdens.

2.2.3 Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment Project p. pp. 9-10
2.2.3 Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment Project The IG effectively suggests that the Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment Project ATO proceeding proves that NS Power can materially change how a project is built without calling it a scope change, whic...

AI summary The Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment Project highlights the regulatory process and oversight by the NSEB regarding cost overruns and the use of contingency funds. NS Power argues that the ATO framework provides sufficient oversight without requiring a scope change application, as the Board reviews cost increases triggered by unforeseen circumstances.

M08162, NS Power CI 29807 – Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment, Board Order, March 12, 2019. p. pp. 10-11
M08162, NS Power CI 29807 – Tusket Main Dam Refurbishment, Board Order, March 12, 2019. that experience significant cost increases without requiring a separate and inherently subjective determination of whether additional execution activit...

AI summary The document discusses NS Power's routine capital spending in the 2026 ACE Plan, noting that the increase in investment is due to the need to connect new customers and perform infrastructure upgrades, rather than a change in the nature of the work. The IG argues that a 70% increase over four years does not reflect a 'like-for-like' program as defined by the CEJC.

2.5 Rate Impacts p. pp. 12-16
2.5 Rate Impacts - The IG requests that the Board direct NS Power to file, alongside each future ACE Plan, a - consolidated ratepayer cost exposure report setting out the utility's ACE capital program, - Reliability Tie costs, known or rea...

AI summary The Intervenor Group (IG) requests that NS Power provide detailed ratepayer cost exposure reports with future ACE Plans and suggests that spending should be scrutinized for affordability and necessity. The IG also asks for a quantitative assessment of the Reliability Plan's impact on rates and overall affordability analysis for ratepayer classes.

DATE FILED: June 5, 2026 Page 17 of 36 p. pp. 16-17
DATE FILED: June 5, 2026 Page 17 of 36 IG Closing Submissions, page 21. 1 2.7 IESO-NS Transition – Capital Coordination 2 3 The IG calls for evidence that NS Power is coordinating its capital planning decisions with the 4 IESO-NS to reduce...

AI summary The IG raises concerns about potential duplication of costs during the IESO-NS transition and calls for evidence of coordination between NS Power and IESO-NS. NS Power acknowledges the importance of collaboration but argues that current capital investments in the 2026 ACE Plan are not duplicative. The IG supports the Board Chair's suggestion of a joint panel with IESO-NS to discuss the Path to 2030.

3.0 REPLY TO CA SUBMISSIONS The Consumer Advocate (CA) does not oppose approval of NS Power's proposed 2026 ACE Plan, but supports the recommendations made by the CA's consultant, John Wilson. The CA further noted concern regarding the cost effectiveness of NS Power's Five-Year Reliability Plan including the distribution routine program. NS Power has reviewed the Consumer Advocate's recommendations and maintains its position on the Wilson recommendations as outlined in NS Power's Rebuttal submission and evidence provided during the hearing. NS Power makes the following brief comments on the key themes identified in the CA's closing submission. 3.1 Distribution Routines The CA, relying on Mr. Wilson's evidence, submits that NS Power should enhance its tracking and reporting of labour hours, overtime, and scheduling practices in distribution routines. It further recommends adoption of a Basis of Schedule (or equivalent) for non-reactive routine work to improve efficiency, reduce overtime, and strengthen planning practices. NS Power's Work Management and Scheduling (WAM) systems already provide detailed tracking of labour, materials, and work order performance, and are actively used to support planning, execution, and efficiency monitoring across capital and operating programs. NS Power is continuously evaluating opportunities to enhance these tools where cost-effective and operationally beneficial. NS Power did not disregard Mr. Wilson's recommendation for an "equivalent" system. As noted at the hearing, even an "equivalent" Basis of Schedule approach could not be down scaled to be appropriate for routine work as the work is very repetitive in nature and managed by a small group of people on each individual initiative that are already aligned on key elements of the project, p. pp. 19-21
o be appropriate for routine work as the work is very repetitive in nature and managed by a small group of people on each individual initiative that are already aligned on key elements of the project, issues, risks and opportunities, and t...

AI summary The Consumer Advocate (CA) supports NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan but raises concerns about the cost-effectiveness of NS Power's Five-Year Reliability Plan. NS Power maintains its position on recommendations from John Wilson and argues that existing systems like WAM, Maximo, and Salesforce are already optimized for efficiency and that additional reporting would provide limited value.

3.7 CEJC Amendments The CA supports several of Mr. Wilson's proposed amendments to the CEJC, including clarifications around scope change, capital thresholds, and definitions of related projects, and recommends enhanced informational filings. NS Power submits that the existing CEJC framework, combined with ATO oversight and General Rate Application review, already provides a robust capital governance structure. The Company has indicated areas where it agrees with Mr. Wilson's recommendations, particularly regarding clarification of the scope change definition. NS Power has also addressed the notion of a two-step process in responding to the IG's Closing submissions at Section 2.2 above. Where NS Power has not agreed with additional procedural requirements, this is primarily because these measures reflect existing practices and would therefore add administrative burden without changing outcomes or enhancing oversight. p. pp. 22-23
3.7 CEJC Amendments The CA supports several of Mr. Wilson's proposed amendments to the CEJC, including clarifications around scope change, capital thresholds, and definitions of related projects, and recommends enhanced informational filin...

AI summary The CA supports certain amendments to the CEJC, including clarifications on scope change and capital thresholds. NS Power argues that the current CEJC framework, along with ATO oversight and General Rate Application review, is already sufficient for capital governance. The company agrees on some clarifications but opposes additional procedural requirements due to potential administrative burden.

5.0 REPLY TO NS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUBMISSIONS NS Power notes that the Department of Energy's (DOE, Department) closing submissions contain a number of broad assertions that are not fully supported on the evidentiary record regarding the Company's capital planning and investment decisions. The Board's role is adjudicative. Its findings must be grounded in the evidentiary record, tested through the hearing process, and applied in accordance with the Public Utilities Act and established principles of utility regulation. Assertions or assumptions that are not supported by evidence before the Board cannot, on their own, establish that a proposed investment is imprudent or unreasonable. The Department did not file evidence in this proceeding. NS Power has therefore responded to selected assertions in the Department's closing submissions and explains why they are not supported by the evidentiary record. To the extent NS Power does not address every statement contained in DOE's closing submissions, that omission should not be taken as agreement. Rather, NS Power relies on its evidence, the hearing record, and the general submissions set out above. At a high level, the Department's closing submissions are built on the following core assumptions: • Capital spending is growing too quickly; • Capital spending is not producing corresponding growth in customers, assets, sales, or reliability; • Project cost escalation reflects poor forecasting, scope creep, and weak governance; and • The Board should respond with structural restrictions, including potentially capping the ACE Plan by up to 50%. NS Power will address these assumptions in turn. p. pp. 24-25
5.0 REPLY TO NS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY SUBMISSIONS NS Power notes that the Department of Energy's (DOE, Department) closing submissions contain a number of broad assertions that are not fully supported on the evidentiary record regarding the...

AI summary NS Power responds to the Department of Energy's closing submissions, noting that the assertions made are not supported by the evidentiary record. The Board's findings must be grounded in evidence and tested through the hearing process. The Department did not file evidence in this proceeding, and NS Power explains why certain assumptions about capital spending and governance are not supported.

5.1 Capital Spending Growth p. pp. 25-26
5.1 Capital Spending Growth DOE submits that capital spending has increased from historical levels, representing a dramatic acceleration that exceeds inflation and economic growth. This is presented as evidence of excessive "asset loading....

AI summary The DOE argues that Nova Scotia Power's capital spending has increased dramatically, exceeding inflation and economic growth, and raises concerns about ratepayer capacity to absorb this spending. NS Power counters that this growth is due to system transformation, aging infrastructure, and decarbonization requirements, and emphasizes that capital investment is driven by operational needs rather than economic indicators.

5.2 Capital Growth versus Physical System Growth p. pp. 26-27
5.2 Capital Growth versus Physical System Growth The DOE states that its most "significant concern regarding NS Power's long-term capital strategy is the apparent divergence between growth in the utility's asset base and the underlying evo...

AI summary The DOE expresses concern about the divergence between NS Power's capital growth and physical system expansion. The submission argues that capital investments are necessary for maintaining infrastructure and reliability, not for expanding the system, and that such investments are essential for service safety and reducing asset failure risks.

5.2.1 Capacity Underutilization p. pp. 27-29
5.2.1 Capacity Underutilization DOE submits that the Annual Capacity Factor of NS Power-owned thermal facilities has dropped from an operational peak of 85% (2008) to below 50% (2023), indicating lower utilization levels over time. Effecti...

AI summary The DOE argues that the capacity factor of NS Power's thermal plants has decreased significantly, but NS Power clarifies that utilization is measured using a more comprehensive Unit Utilization Factor, which accounts for operating hours, starts, and flexibility. This factor shows that utilization has not dropped significantly, and sustained capital investment is needed to maintain grid reliability.

5.4 Reliability Spending and Improvements in Reliability p. pp. 29-30
5.4 Reliability Spending and Improvements in Reliability - The Department argues that reliability performance has not improved in proportion to capital - spending and therefore questions the effectiveness of reliability investments. In NS...

AI summary The Department of Energy argues that reliability performance has not improved proportionally with capital spending, questioning the effectiveness of reliability investments. NS Power counters that factors beyond utility investment, such as severe weather and aging infrastructure, impact reliability. The Company emphasizes that reliability investments are preventative and that the existing Performance Standards framework already ensures accountability for reliability outcomes.

5.5 Project Cost Escalation p. pp. 30-31
5.5 Project Cost Escalation DOE submits: The evidence demonstrates that material project escalation is not limited to isolated projects or unique operational circumstances but instead reflects a broader and recurring pattern across the uti...

AI summary DOE argues that project cost escalation across multiple categories indicates a recurring pattern, not just isolated issues. They note that the ACE Plan is a planning process, not a fixed-price commitment, and emphasize that budget changes over time do not necessarily imply imprudence. The regulatory framework, including ATOs, provides accountability for significant variances.

5.7 DOE's Requests of the Board Imposing caps or ceilings on capital expenditures would fundamentally conflict with NS Power's statutory obligation to provide safe and adequate service. Such limits would represent a departure from evidence-based and risk-driven asset management, potentially exposing NS Power's customers to unacceptable reliability and safety risks. Defined expenditure limits bear no relationship to the physical condition of assets or the pace of deterioration. Instead, they would force the Company to make arbitrary decisions about which risks to accept and which customers to leave vulnerable. The appropriate safeguard is not a cap or ceiling, but rather evidence-based scrutiny at the project- level, which is precisely what the ACE Plan process is designed to provide. This framework allows the NSEB to rigorously assess whether each proposed investment is necessary for safe and adequate service and whether the associated costs are just and reasonable. p. pp. 33-34
5.7 DOE's Requests of the Board Imposing caps or ceilings on capital expenditures would fundamentally conflict with NS Power's statutory obligation to provide safe and adequate service. Such limits would represent a departure from evidence...

AI summary The Department of Energy argues that imposing caps on capital expenditures would conflict with NS Power's obligation to provide safe and adequate service, as such limits would not align with evidence-based asset management and could expose customers to reliability and safety risks. Instead, the ACE Plan process is presented as the appropriate safeguard for project-level scrutiny.

6.0 CONCLUSION In this proceeding, NS Power has demonstrated that the investments proposed in the 2026 ACE Plan are prudent, necessary, and aligned with the Company's statutory obligation to provide safe and adequate service to customers. The evidentiary record shows that these investments have been appropriately developed, assessed pursuant to the CEJC, and are responsive to the evolving operating conditions facing the system, including aging infrastructure, increasing electrification, and legislated policy requirements. The concerns raised by intervenors do not identify any material gaps in the existing regulatory framework or evidentiary record that would justify the imposition of additional reporting requirements or structural constraints. Further, introducing caps, duplicative reporting, or additional approval layers would not enhance oversight, but would instead risk delaying necessary investments and increase costs and operational risks. In terms of affordability and consciousness of the cost impact to customers, this is a serious issue for customers and one that NS Power is focused on addressing through solutions that maintain a safe and reliable energy supply for Nova Scotians while keeping rates low. At the project level, NS Power is required to pursue the least cost means of addressing identified risks. At the system level, overall capital spending and its impact on rates are assessed through the GRA process. Together, these processes ensure that customer impacts are considered alongside the need to maintain safe, reliable, and resilient service. For these reasons, NS Power respectfully submits that the Board should approve the 2026 ACE Plan capital projects and routines as filed, the revised Summary CEJC as amended in NS Power's Rebuttal Evidence, and decline the additional directives proposed by intervenors. p. pp. 34-35
6.0 CONCLUSION In this proceeding, NS Power has demonstrated that the investments proposed in the 2026 ACE Plan are prudent, necessary, and aligned with the Company's statutory obligation to provide safe and adequate service to customers....

AI summary NS Power argues that the 2026 ACE Plan investments are prudent and necessary, aligning with statutory obligations. They claim the investments are appropriately developed and assessed, with no material gaps in the regulatory framework. NS Power emphasizes affordability and the need to maintain safe, reliable service while keeping rates low. They recommend the Board approve the plan and reject additional directives.

102429Board Letter enclosing Order / CI C0080111 not approved at this time 1 passage
Section 1 p. p. 0
June 18, 2026 M12619 Participants Dear Parties: M12619 – Nova Scotia Power Inc. - 2026 ACE Plan Application The annual ACE Plan allows the Board to consider NS Power's capital expenditure program for 2026. To allow for a meaningful hearing...

AI summary The Board has decided not to approve the CI C0080111 2026 RTU Deployment at this time, deferring further consideration pending a report from Synapse Energy Economics on NS Power's Five-Year Reliability Plan. The 2026 ACE Plan Application is under review with a decision expected before the year is half over.

102430Board Order 3 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for Approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan BEFORE: Richard J. Melanson, LL.B., Panel Chair Steven M. Murphy,...

AI summary This document outlines an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding is before a panel consisting of Richard J. Melanson, Steven M. Murphy, and Jennifer L. Nicholson.

ORDER
ORDER Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) filed an application for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan on December 12, 2025. The Board approves all the projects listed in the 2026 ACE Plan, except for CI C00801...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) submitted its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which the Board approved in part. The Board deferred approval of one project pending a final report from Synapse Energy Consultants in Matter M12558. The approved projects total approximately $68.4 million, while routine capital expenditures amount to about $207.3 million.

____________________________ Clerk of the Board
____________________________ Clerk of the Board SCHEDULE "A" 2026 ACE Plan Approved Projects CI Number Title 2026 Budget Project Total Generation C0080206 POA Boiler Refurbishment 2026 $1,195,706 $1,304,600 C0080205 POA Boiler Refractory R...

AI summary The document outlines the 2026 ACE Plan Approved Projects, detailing various capital expenditure initiatives across Generation, Transmission, Distribution, and General Plant categories, with specific projects and their associated budget and total costs.

103410Decision 34 passages
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for 2026 p. p. 4
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for 2026 BEFORE: Richard J. Melanson, LL.B., Panel Chair Steven M. Murphy, MBA, P.Eng., Member Jennifer L. Nicholson, CPA...

AI summary This document outlines an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for approval of its Annual Capital Expenditure Plan for 2026. It lists the panel members, the applicant, and various intervenors involved in the proceeding.

Preamble p. pp. 4-89
- [1] Each year, Nova Scotia Power Incorporated files an Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan outlining its proposed capital expenditures for the upcoming year. In accordance with ss. 35, 35A and 35AA of the Public Utilities Act, RSNS 198...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Incorporated submitted its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan for approval, seeking authorization for projects totaling $76.7 million and routine expenditures of $207.3 million. The Board approved the plan, except for the RTU Deployment project, which was deferred pending the final report from Synapse Energy Economics Consultants in Matter M12558. The Board also addressed several general issues related to capital spending and project approvals.

2.1 Content of the 2026 ACE Plan p. p. 5
2.1 Content of the 2026 ACE Plan - [6] The ACE Plan application presents NS Power's forecasted capital expenditure program for the year, detailing planned investments, project timelines and associated funding requirements. The ACE Plan inc...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan outlines NS Power's forecasted capital expenditure program, including $76.7 million in requested projects, with $49.0 million planned for 2026 and the remainder in subsequent years. The plan details project timelines, funding requirements, and responses to previous directives.

2.1.1 Routine and Capital Work Order Applications p. pp. 5-6
2.1.1 Routine and Capital Work Order Applications [8] For each routine and capital work order application in the ACE Plan, NS Power provided detailed project descriptions, justification for the proposed investment and supporting cost estim...

AI summary NS Power submitted routine and capital work order applications under the ACE Plan, providing detailed project descriptions and cost estimates. The Board found these projects necessary and prudent, approving them and directing NS Power to update its 2026 ACE Plan with additional transmission line projects completed since filing.

2.2.2 C0021608 – TUC Shoreline Sheet Pile Refurbishment p. p. 7
2.2.2 C0021608 – TUC Shoreline Sheet Pile Refurbishment [13] This project involves the installation of an approximately 80-meter-long sloped rock revetment along the southwest shoreline of the Tufts Cove Generating Station (TUC). The proje...

AI summary This project involves the installation of an 80-meter sloped rock revetment at Tufts Cove Generating Station to replace a deteriorating steel sheet pile structure. NS Power evaluated multiple options and chose the rock revetment due to its cost-effectiveness and performance in weighted criteria such as design, operational impacts, and regulatory considerations.

2.2.3 C0080135 – Burnside #2 Combustion Turbine (CT-BGT2) Engine Replacement p. pp. 7-12
2.2.3 C0080135 – Burnside #2 Combustion Turbine (CT-BGT2) Engine Replacement [23] CT-BGT2 is a 33 MW combustion turbine located in the Burnside Industrial Park in Dartmouth. It provides black start capability, 10-minute reserve, Volt-Amper...

AI summary The document discusses the replacement of the Burnside #2 Combustion Turbine (CT-BGT2) engine due to damage observed during an inspection. NS Power plans to refurbish or replace the turbine engine following OEM guidelines, but the Board expressed concerns about whether alternative options, such as purchasing a used engine, were thoroughly evaluated.

2.3.1 Increase in Recent ACE Plans p. p. 18
2.3.1 Increase in Recent ACE Plans [39] NS Power requested approval of approximately $207.3 million for Routine Capital Expenditures in the 2026 ACE Plan. Reported routine capital expenditures declined from $230 million in 2022 to $153.3 m...

AI summary NS Power requested approval for $207.3 million in Routine Capital Expenditures for the 2026 ACE Plan. Routine capital expenditures have increased from $153.3 million in 2023 to $176.4 million in 2024 and further to $189.2 million in 2025, with a 9.6% increase forecast for 2026. The majority of these expenditures are focused on distribution upgrades and replacement.

2.3.1.1 Findings p. pp. 18-20
2.3.1.1 Findings [44] The Board accepts that an increase in expenditure does not, in itself, mean that an activity ceases to qualify as routine. Required expenditures may reasonably vary with asset conditions, customer growth, system requi...

AI summary The Board acknowledges that increases in routine expenditures do not automatically disqualify activities as routine but is concerned that temporary cost increases may become embedded in historical data, influencing future forecasts. NS Power is urged to distinguish between structural and temporary cost drivers in future ACE Plans.

2.3.2 Enhanced Tracking and Cost Minimization p. p. 21
h as D005 (Unplanned Replacements of Deteriorated Equipment) but considered that overtime should nevertheless be tracked and that different considerations apply to work that can be planned in advance: For example, the forecast overtime lab...

AI summary The document discusses the tracking of overtime labour in distribution routines and regulatory replacements, noting that NS Power has detailed data on labour efficiency through systems like Maximo/Salesforce. It highlights opportunities to optimize staffing and reduce costs by scheduling alternative shifts and improving work management practices.

2.3.2.1.1 Findings p. pp. 21-24
2.3.2.1.1 Findings [55] The Board considers that NS Power's existing Work Management systems provide an opportunity to improve the assessment of Routine expenditures without creating an entirely new reporting system. The objective is not a...

AI summary The Board acknowledges NS Power's existing Work Management systems as a tool to improve the assessment of routine expenditures without creating a new reporting system. The focus is on evaluating whether the cost of recurring work is increasing or decreasing over time, particularly for routine capital spending, due to its materiality and labor and contractor use.

2.3.3 Routines D005 and D055 p. pp. 24-25
2.3.3 Routines D005 and D055 [57] The interplay between D005 and D055 is particularly important. The annual expenditure for D005, representing reactive or unplanned replacement, remains elevated. At the same time, D055, intended to capture...

AI summary The document discusses the interplay between D005 and D055, noting that D005's annual expenditure for reactive replacement remains high, while D055's planned replacement budget increased significantly in 2026. The Board questions whether the Utility has a coherent replacement strategy, and NS Power acknowledged that planned replacement could reduce unplanned replacement costs over time.

2.3.4 Basis of Schedule or Equivalent Process p. pp. 25-26
2.3.4 Basis of Schedule or Equivalent Process [61] Mr. Wilson recommended that NS Power adopt a Basis of Schedule, or an equivalent practice, for routine activities that can be planned in advance. Such a process is intended to identify lab...

AI summary Mr. Wilson recommended that NS Power adopt a Basis of Schedule or equivalent process for routine activities to improve planning and reduce costs. NS Power disagreed, arguing that routine work is smaller and less complex than capital projects and does not require the same level of documentation. The CA clarified that an equivalent and proportionate practice could be used for routine work where significant costs are involved.

2.3.5 New Customer Routines p. p. 27
2.3.5 New Customer Routines [66] New customer routine capital expenditures represent the largest individual distribution routine subcategory with a budget of approximately $67.8 million in 2026. The 2026 budgets for D004 – New Customer Upg...

AI summary New customer routine capital expenditures are a significant part of the distribution budget, with a 2026 allocation of $67.8 million. NS Power uses expenditure-based forecasts, and Mr. Wilson suggests capturing more detailed customer data to improve forecasting and planning. NS Power argues that current forecasting methods have been effective, as no ATO was required for new customer routines in several years.

2.3.6 Spare Inventory Pooling p. pp. 28-29
2.3.6 Spare Inventory Pooling [74] Mr. Wilson examined whether spare inventory pooling could provide a more cost-effective alternative to NS Power independently maintaining certain high-value, longlead-time spare equipment. He recommended...

AI summary The document discusses spare inventory pooling as a potential cost-effective alternative for NS Power. Mr. Wilson recommends the Board obtain detailed information on NS Power's existing spare inventory. NS Power, however, has previously investigated spare inventory pooling and found it less effective and reliable than its current risk-based strategy, citing concerns with availability, compatibility, and transportation.

2.3.7 Routine Program Evolution and Capital Envelopes p. p. 30
2.3.7 Routine Program Evolution and Capital Envelopes [77] The IG raised concerns with respect to what it characterized as "capital envelope filling." It relied on evidence that when an initially contemplated project cannot proceed, NS Pow...

AI summary The IG and DOE raised concerns about NS Power's capital spending practices, including underspending on the ACE Plan and the expansion of capital envelopes for routine distribution projects. NS Power defended its approach, stating that its capital plan is risk-based and flexible, with expenditures varying from forecasts.

2.3.7.1 Findings p. pp. 30-31
2.3.7.1 Findings - [80] The Board accepts that a fixed capital ceiling is not an appropriate substitute for risk-based asset management, as a ceiling may not adequately address identified risks. The Board also accepts that sometimes it may...

AI summary The Board acknowledges that a fixed capital ceiling is not suitable for risk-based asset management. It emphasizes that capital reallocation and 'capital envelope' justification are separate issues. The Board is concerned about baseline ratcheting in the Routine Program and calls for more information to determine if increased expenditures reflect permanent investment needs or temporary cost pressures.

2.4 Interested Party Review of the CEJC p. pp. 31-32
2.4 Interested Party Review of the CEJC [86] The IG recommended interested party review of the Routine Expenditure provisions of the CEJC, including consideration of a materiality threshold requiring enhanced justification where a Routine...

AI summary The IG recommended an interested party review of the Routine Expenditure provisions of the CEJC, including a materiality threshold for significant year-over-year growth. NS Power opposed a separate process, arguing that the annual ACE Plan, reporting requirements, and ATO processes already ensure adequate transparency and scrutiny.

3.0 CHANGES TO THE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE JUSTIFICATION CRITERIA p. pp. 33-34
3.0 CHANGES TO THE CAPITAL EXPENDITURE JUSTIFICATION CRITERIA [90] NS Power held an engagement session on October 29, 2025, in advance of filing the 2026 ACE Plan. The session reviewed NS Power's proposed changes to the CEJC. Changes were...

AI summary NS Power held an engagement session on October 29, 2025, to discuss proposed changes to the CEJC in advance of filing the 2026 ACE Plan. The changes clarify when an ATO is required for a sub-routine and its associated expenditure threshold, and include additional language in Appendix A for Transmission and Distribution Routines. These changes were supported by the CA and approved by the Board.

3.1.1.1 Sustaining Versus Transformative Investment p. p. 35
3.1.1.1 Sustaining Versus Transformative Investment [91] Section 15.1 of the CEJC provides that NS Power's Routine Program consists of recurring annual allocations for high-volume, repetitive, like-for-like capital replacements, enhancemen...

AI summary The document discusses the growth of NS Power's Routine Program, noting a 70% increase over four years and questioning whether the program remains 'routine' as defined by the CEJC. The Industrial Group argues that this growth, even excluding new routines, suggests a shift from sustaining to transformative investment, raising concerns about alignment with regulatory criteria.

[93] NS Power disagreed: p. p. 35
[93] NS Power disagreed: Respectfully, "like-for-like" is in reference to replacing assets with similar (like) assets that are in need of replacement or refurbishment, and does not indicate that the annual level of investment must remain s...

AI summary NS Power argues that 'like-for-like' replacements refer to substituting assets with similar ones requiring replacement or refurbishment, not maintaining a constant annual investment level. They also state that the CEJC allows for enhancements and additions, and that recurring work does not classify as non-routine.

3.1.1.1.1 Findings p. pp. 35-36
3.1.1.1.1 Findings [95] The Board agrees that the CEJC is broader than strict physical like-for-like replacement. In particular, the express references to "improvements" and "enhancements" mean that some change in capability may properly o...

AI summary The Board acknowledges that the CEJC includes improvements and enhancements beyond strict replacement, but distinguishes between routine evolution and material transformation. Exhibit N-1 shows that 45% of 2026 Routine Program spending is not like-for-like, indicating growth and performance improvements.

3.2 CEJC Scope Change Amendments and Recommendations p. pp. 36-37
3.2 CEJC Scope Change Amendments and Recommendations [99] Capital project Scope Change applications are currently addressed in Section 12.2 of NS Power's Capital Expenditure Justification Criteria. These are intended to address changes in...

AI summary The document discusses the need to define 'Scope Change' in the CEJC, as raised by the IG during the 2025 ACE Plan proceeding. The Board agreed and directed NS Power to consult on incorporating a definition into the CEJC for the 2026 ACE Plan.

3.2.1 Findings p. p. 42
are filed after work has been committed or completed. The Company then argued that the existence of a separate Scope Change application process would not alter this practical reality. NS Power stated: … Many scope changes arise during proj...

AI summary NS Power argues that many scope change applications are filed after work has already been committed or completed due to unforeseen circumstances during project execution. They claim that delaying work for a Board review process would increase costs and pose operational risks, making many applications an 'after the fact' review.

4.1 Findings p. pp. 47-55
4.1 Findings [150] The Board agrees that vegetation management, system hardening and grid modernization are recognized tools for reliability improvements. It is on this basis, and an assessment of the individual merits of each project subm...

AI summary The Board has substantially approved the Five-Year Reliability Plan projects in the 2026 ACE Plan but expresses concerns about the value for ratepayers from significant vegetation management spending and the lack of measurable improvements in reliability despite increased expenditures. The Board emphasizes the need for a clearer connection between spending and improved reliability outcomes.

5.0 CAPITAL SPENDING GROWTH p. pp. 57-60
5.0 CAPITAL SPENDING GROWTH [163] All parties in this proceeding have concerns about NS Power's increase in capital spending over the last several years. Much of this concern was focused on the Five-Year Reliability Plan discussed earlier...

AI summary The document highlights concerns about Nova Scotia Power's significant increase in capital spending, particularly the deployment of over half of the total investments made in the last 21 years within the next 60 months. This rapid growth in capital expenditures raises concerns about ratepayer capacity to absorb these costs.

6.1 Past Experience with Rate Impact Analysis p. p. 67
6.1 Past Experience with Rate Impact Analysis [175] In its Closing Submissions, the IG made the following request of the Board: The Industrial Group submits that the Board should direct NSPI to provide, with the Year 3 update to the Reliab...

AI summary The Industrial Group requests the Board to direct NSPI to provide a quantitative assessment of the Reliability Plan's impact on rates with the Year 3 update. It also asks for consideration of the annual capital expenditure plan's impact on ratepayer classes through bill impact or affordability analysis.

6.4 NS Power's Position About Rate Affordability and Capital Projects p. pp. 69-70
6.4 NS Power's Position About Rate Affordability and Capital Projects [183] The concept of affordability has been raised in different ways, when addressing concerns about the significant costs of the Five-Year Reliability Plan, and the 202...

AI summary NS Power argues that affordability should be assessed in the GRA forum, emphasizing that capital expenditures are prudent and necessary if they meet performance standards and least cost principles. The Board acknowledges the need for flexibility in capital programs but warns against deferring maintenance to avoid rate impacts.

6.5 Need to Consider Rate Impacts and A Potential Framework p. pp. 70-71
6.5 Need to Consider Rate Impacts and A Potential Framework [187] The Board still has some concerns about the utility of a rate impact analysis, where the full set of studies and data available in a GRA are not readily reproduced on an ann...

AI summary The Board acknowledges concerns about the utility of rate impact analysis but believes it could provide useful context for the Five-Year Reliability Plan and annual ACE Plans. It directs NS Power to provide a rate impact analysis for the 2027 ACE Plan, focusing on the projected impact of capital expenditures on rates for 2028–2030. The analysis should address proposed ACE Plan capital expenditures, excluding the NB Intertie project, which is already approved.

8.1 Impacts on Capital Planning p. p. 84
8.1 Impacts on Capital Planning [209] On April 25, 2025, NS Power discovered a cybersecurity breach which impacted certain parts of its information technology network resulting in an inability to access certain systems and data. The Board...

AI summary NS Power experienced a cybersecurity breach in April 2025, leading to system and data access issues. This has caused delays in capital project filings and increased reliance on the GIS database for data gaps. The Board is reviewing the incident in two proceedings, with a specific focus on capital planning impacts.

8.2 Cost Implications in 2026 ACE Plan p. p. 84
8.2 Cost Implications in 2026 ACE Plan [211] While a detailed review was undertaken though the IR process and in questioning at the oral hearing, no additional capital costs were identified in the 2026 ACE Plan that specifically related to...

AI summary The 2026 ACE Plan did not identify additional capital costs related to the cybersecurity incident. NS Power used a coding system to exclude restoration costs from the rate base and addressed deferred projects through internal measures or Board approval.

8.3 Considerations for Subsequent Submittal Items p. pp. 84-85
8.3 Considerations for Subsequent Submittal Items [212] There was discussion about IT or cybersecurity-related projects listed as subsequent submittal items in the 2026 ACE Plan. Two projects, in particular, raised several concerns. The Id...

AI summary The document discusses concerns raised about the increasing costs of IT and cybersecurity-related projects in the 2026 ACE Plan, particularly the Identity and Access Management and Customer Information System Replacement projects. The Industrial Group recommends that future submittals include detailed explanations of cost variances, especially those related to the 2025 cyber incident. NS Power argues that existing processes already cover necessary information, but the Board agrees that specific references to cyber incident impacts are needed.

10.0 MERSEY UPDATE p. p. 89
ject. As such, NS Power is continuing conversations with Department of Fisheries and Oceans in order to understand requirements associated with fish passage that may not have been in place previously. [227] Mersey Redevelopment Project cap...

AI summary NS Power is deferring Mersey Redevelopment Project activities until the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) provides clarity on the long-term approach for the Mersey Hydro System. In the interim, NS Power is implementing incremental sustaining investments through the Hydro Investment Plan (HIP) to ensure safe and reliable operation of the MHS.

10.1 Findings p. pp. 89-96
10.1 Findings [237] The Board accepts NS Power's Mersey Hydro System Update as filed with the 2026 ACE Plan application. [238] The Board directs NS Power to provide another comprehensive update on the Mersey Redevelopment Project in the 20...

AI summary The Board accepts NS Power's Mersey Hydro System Update as part of the 2026 ACE Plan application and requires a more comprehensive update on the Mersey Redevelopment Project for the 2027 ACE Plan, including capital sustaining costs, NPV analysis, and updates related to the Mersey Hydro System modelling from the 2026 IRP.

11.0 CONCLUSION p. p. 96
11.0 CONCLUSION [239] The Board has approved NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, except for C0080111 – 2026 RTU Deployment. The approved projects are listed in the attached Schedule "A". [240] The Board has provided comments on specific capital proj...

AI summary The Board has approved NS Power's 2026 ACE Plan, except for C0080111 – 2026 RTU Deployment. The Board provided comments on various aspects including capital projects, decarbonization targets, and the Mersey Hydro System refurbishment. It also issued directives for future ACE Plan applications, requiring updates and detailed financial reporting.

103411Board Order 2 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED for Approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan BEFORE: Richard J. Melanson, LL.B., Panel Chair Steven M. Murphy,...

AI summary This document pertains to an application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated for the approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure Plan under the Public Utilities Act. The proceeding is before a panel consisting of Richard J. Melanson, Steven M. Murphy, and Jennifer L. Nicholson.

ORDER
ORDER Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) filed an application for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan on December 12, 2025. The Board issued an Order on June 18, 2026, however, reserved the right to provide a...

AI summary NS Power submitted its 2026 ACE Plan, which was mostly approved by the Board, except for CI C0080111-2026 RTU Deployment. The Board deferred further consideration of that project pending a final report from Synapse Energy Consultants. The Board also issued directives for future ACE Plans, including updates and additional reporting requirements.

20260421-1Hearing Transcript — 04/21/2026 (Revised Transcript - Refiled May 20, 2026) 31 passages
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF: OF A GENERAL RATE APPLICATION BY NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPEN...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is considering a general rate application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) seeking approval for its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals approximately $702.1 million.

I N D E X O F P R O C E E D I N G S
I N D E X O F P R O C E E D I N G S April 21, 2026 PAGE NO. 8 With me are my colleagues, Steve 9 Murphy and Jennifer Nicholson. 10 We also have in front Rob Norwood, 11 who's sitting to my right, who is acting as the public 12 proceedings...

AI summary This document is an index of proceedings related to the approval of Nova Scotia Power's Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Program. The hearing is the 16th annual public forum for the ACE Plan, with stakeholder participation. Notices of the hearing were advertised in local newspapers, and the Board received several requests for formal Intervenor status.

OPENING STATEMENT 27 NS DEPT. OF ENERGY
OPENING STATEMENT 27 NS DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 the burden of those overruns falls onto ratepayers. 2 For example, some of the hydro plants 3 produce minimal energy and yet work on them has often 4 proceeded in the face of significant cost overr...

AI summary The Department of Energy highlights concerns over cost overruns in hydro plant projects and calls for regulatory scrutiny of the 2026 ACE Plan, emphasizing the need for accountability and alignment with the IESO mandate. It also requests the Board to disallow ratepayer funding for certain projects, arguing that financial consequences should be borne by shareholders, not ratepayers.

NS POWER PANEL 43 In-ch, (Power)
NS POWER PANEL 43 In-ch, (Power) 1 integrity programs. Since then, I've held several roles 2 in the company with increasing responsibility in the field 3 of asset management. My primary focus has been on 4 advancing and standardizing asset...

AI summary The document includes testimony from individuals with extensive experience in asset management and power production at Nova Scotia Power. The individuals discussed their roles and backgrounds, focusing on asset management methodologies and capital projects outlined in the ACE Plan.

OPENING STATEMENT 51 NOVA SCOTIA POWER
OPENING STATEMENT 51 NOVA SCOTIA POWER 1 periods of high demand, such as the extreme cold snap Nova 12 service and carrying out complex infrastructure projects 13 safely and efficiently. 14 And finally, I want to highlight the 15 importanc...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power presents its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, emphasizing investments in infrastructure to ensure reliability and affordability while aligning with the province's 2030 climate goals. The plan includes risk-based strategies to maintain aging assets and integrate new resources.

1 yes.
NS POWER PANEL 65 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 yes. 20 In this case, we certainly wouldn't 21 have had all that information, some of it due to the cyber 22 event that we had last year. We did lose certain 23 information. But our accounting software d...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of a cyber event on data tracking at Nova Scotia Power, particularly in relation to labour hours and capital projects. It highlights the use of PowerPlan software for tracking labour and the challenges faced due to data loss.

NS POWER PANEL 69 Cr-ex, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 69 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 groups are involved to fully understand all the necessary 2 scheduling components of the capital project. 3 The routine programs, even the non 4 reactive ones, are all typically very repetitive in 5 natu...

AI summary The discussion focuses on the repetitive nature of routine capital projects and the limited need for additional documentation. Nova Scotia Power argues that existing systems like IBM Maximo/Salesforce are continuously improved annually and that additional reporting requirements may not add value. The rebuttal suggests that while improvements are made, there is no need to report on them specifically.

NS POWER PANEL 81 Cr-ex, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 81 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 efficiency, would you not agree that being able to 2 pinpoint different capital programs and the level of 3 efficiency that you're getting out of each of them might 4 be useful information to, you know,...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the efficiency of capital programs and the use of internal resources in Nova Scotia Power's operations. The witness explains that while benefits from an application are broadly applied across programs, the distribution of savings may vary based on the use of internal versus external resources. Nova Scotia Power's rebuttal is also referenced.

NS POWER PANEL 83 Cr-ex, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 83 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 programs and come up with a figure, but how does that 13 would then be tracked back to capital programs and 14 projects and different expense accounts, right? 15 (Beaton) Yes. Yeah, as I said, A. 16 ever...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the tracking of capital programs and expense accounts, with a focus on how work orders are tied to GL accounts and capital budgets. There is also a mention of the WAM Project and an extension of its reporting period.

NS POWER PANEL 93 Cr-ex, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 93 Cr-ex, (Murphy) 1 2 3 4 5 routinely include a 15% contingency in transmission line and 8 transformer project budgets where no risk matrix is prepared. And I understand five out of seven of 6 the projects in this Applicati...

AI summary The discussion centers on Nova Scotia Power's use of a 15% contingency in project budgets for transmission lines and transformers without a risk matrix. The concern raised is that if risks are well understood, the contingency may be unnecessarily high. Nova Scotia Power defends the 15% contingency as necessary to account for risks such as outage schedules, terrain, and material costs.

NS POWER PANEL 125 Cr-ex, (Powell)
NS POWER PANEL 125 Cr-ex, (Powell) 1 gets there, they don't see the tree any more, but there 16 Mr. Beaton and Ms. MacMullin so they're not looking behind 17 them. 18 MS. MacMULLIN: May I ask you to 19 repeat the question, just to make sur...

AI summary The text discusses the reasons for increased spending in D055 in 2025, primarily due to reliability projects in Glace Bay, including rebuilding efforts driven by conditions and outages. The 2025 forecast is noted as lower than expected.

Section 87
1 referenced, up to the end of July with actuals, and then 2 the remaining forecast, we were still largely working off 3 of manual processes with forecasts last year. We didn't 4 have PowerPlan, our capital which is the software we 5 compl...

AI summary The discussion highlights challenges with capital forecasting processes, particularly the reliance on manual methods and the lack of software like PowerPlan. The 2026 ACE Plan is considered accurate, with confidence in the $15 million figure. The 2025 budget overrun is attributed to work originally planned for later years but accelerated due to performance and outage issues.

NS POWER PANEL 131 Cr-ex, (Powell)
NS POWER PANEL 131 Cr-ex, (Powell) 1 timing required for that work and we would have then 2 proceeded with it in 2025. 3 MEMBER MURPHY: So if it was 4 originally planned for a future year, wouldn't that 5 suggest that your budget for 2026...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the timing of work planned for 2025 and its implications for the 2026 budget. It also touches on the basis for the 15 million figure, which includes both historical data and planned elements from the ACE Plan. The conversation references an exhibit and specific lines within it, including the Momentary Average Interruption Frequency Index (MAIFI).

NS POWER PANEL 155 Cr-ex, (Powell)
NS POWER PANEL 155 Cr-ex, (Powell) 410, there's a long chart and they all say 43,200. So we've got different numbers there. So can you walk me through that? Are they for different things? A. (Beaton) No, they would be for the same thing. S...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the unit cost figures presented in an application, with a discrepancy between 43,200 and 46,800 per kilometre. The speaker emphasizes reliance on the number included in the application itself for Phase 11 costs.

NS POWER PANEL 161 Cr-ex, (Powell)
NS POWER PANEL 161 Cr-ex, (Powell) 1 present there. They may not all be eligible to become 3 Rudderham and I'm going to be asking some questions on 4 behalf of the Industrial Group. 5 As has been indicated by my friends, 6 I'll ask questio...

AI summary The text outlines a proceeding where the Industrial Group's representative, Rudderham, is questioning panel members about the 2026 ACE Plan's routine capital expenditures, which are defined as recurring annual allocations for sustaining the current asset base, not transformative projects.

NS POWER PANEL 171 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 171 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 frequent basis for the foreseeable future, we thought it 2 best to include them in the routine program for approval 3 on a go-forward, starting this year. 4 We've seen significant increases 5 related...

AI summary The discussion addresses rising costs in routine programs, particularly due to inflation and increased vehicle and transformer costs since the onset of the pandemic. The speaker mentions a significant increase in costs from $10 million in 2023 to an estimated $70 million, with ongoing inflationary pressures impacting the utility sector.

NS POWER PANEL 173 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 173 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 We added the Dam Safety Routine a 2 number of years ago. 3 So without going through the list line 4 by line, it's not I'm not solely attributing that to 5 the three new ones this year. 6 Okay. So tha...

AI summary The discussion centers on the Dam Safety Routine costs and NSP's review process for routine capital programs. The witness indicates that while there is no specific routine review process, all capital expenditures, including routines, follow the same procurement and scrutiny processes as other capital costs.

NS POWER PANEL 175 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 175 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 [12:30:15] Q. Where you've indicated that 2 perhaps the unit prices are going up, has NSPI considered 3 reducing the number of units for some of those items per 4 year in order to reduce the overall...

AI summary The discussion centers on NSPI's approach to routine capital expenditures, emphasizing that decisions are based on risk mitigation and least cost methods. Affordability is addressed through a GRA process rather than during the preparation of the ACE Plan. NSPI argues that not proceeding with necessary work would be more costly or impactful.

NS POWER PANEL 177 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 177 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 routine, keep these trucks on the road longer, that's 2 going to have an impact on the operating expenses. The 3 maintenance costs on those trucks near the end of their 4 life increases significantly...

AI summary The discussion focuses on the impact of delaying vehicle replacements on operating expenses and safety, as well as the development of the ACE Plan, which prioritizes affordability and least-cost methods for customers. The conversation also touches on capital expenditure decisions and their internal considerations.

NS POWER PANEL 179 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 179 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 capital routine program? 2 The yearly increase either by the Q. 3 specific routine or as a whole. Is there a cap for 4 either? 5 A. (Beaton) No, we don't necessarily 6 put a cap on it. Again, we dete...

AI summary The discussion revolves around NSP's capital routine program, including how they determine necessary mitigation methods and monitor cost creep year over year. The response highlights the use of asset strategy committees and strategic asset planning groups to ensure cost-effective risk mitigation.

NS POWER PANEL 183 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 183 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 (SHORT PAUSE) 2 BY MS. RUDDERHAM: 3 Q. And sorry, I didn't give you the 4 specific figure. Just in the range of $100 million. 5 [12:40:15] A. (Peachey) Subject to check, we 6 would agree. However, we...

AI summary The discussion centers on a capital increase related to the installation of synchronous condensers, which was influenced by government directives from the Minister of Natural Resources and Renewables. There was a mention of a letter in January 2024 and a second letter in October 2024, with the number of condensers increasing from four to nine.

NS POWER PANEL 241 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 241 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) potential cost savings on a go-forward on this Reliability Plan, we would certainly look at it. [2:49:56] Q. Could they do it on a could you do it on, like, a forecasting basis? Like, if you're saying,...

AI summary The discussion addresses potential cost savings from a Reliability Plan and the feasibility of forecasting avoided costs for future years. The speaker suggests that while forecasting is possible, it may not provide accurate or valuable insights for ongoing plan reviews. The conversation then shifts to the 2026 capital budget, with uncertainty about who to address the questions to.

NS POWER PANEL 245 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 245 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 building the ACE Plan as a whole, all starts at the bottom 2 level, where individual project managers are tasked to 3 mitigate risks in the least-cost method. And when those 4 when that least-cost me...

AI summary The discussion centers on the Affordability Clean Energy (ACE) Plan and its alignment with Nova Scotia Power's Capital Plan, emphasizing bottom-up risk mitigation and affordability considerations. The ACE Plan provides more detailed capital investment planning compared to the General Rate Application (GRA), and large projects require Board approval.

NS POWER PANEL 247 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 247 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 correct? 2 (Beaton) Yes, it is. A. 3 Q. Okay. 4 MS. RUDDERHAM: So Mr. Norwood, if you 5 don't mind scrolling down a little bit further to page 18 6 there? I'm looking at lines 15 to 17. Right there....

AI summary The discussion focuses on the consideration of affordability in the context of capital expenditures for high-risk assets. The application emphasizes the use of SME knowledge to determine the most cost-effective mitigation approach, taking into account customer affordability and execution feasibility.

NS POWER PANEL 249 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 249 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 investment decision, it would consider customer 5 Q. And then "P&A" means "Planned in 6 Advance"? 7 A. (Beaton) Also correct. 8 Q. So when I added up the total of 9 those three, it looks like those t...

AI summary The text discusses a question regarding the total investment of approximately $93 million in three categories, with the respondent confirming that the top 10 most expensive projects are listed in Tab R-1(b). The questioner notes a discrepancy between the total of $34 million in tables and the remaining $59 million, and the respondent explains that a full project list is not included in the Q4 report.

Section 161
recorded as capital costs? - A. (Beaton) No, they weren't. Part of the work we did last year was to ensure that no costs related to the restoration due to the cyber event were captured in any capital project. So those all would have been b...

AI summary The discussion confirms that cybersecurity-related restoration costs were not included in capital projects and were instead handled separately by the utility or through insurance. A monthly review process ensures that such costs are excluded from the rate base, with quarterly adjustments made accordingly.

NS POWER PANEL 261 Cr-ex, (Rudderham)
NS POWER PANEL 261 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 It's just an updated forecast based on 2 learnings that we've had, whether that is through our work 3 with industry sources or a whole host of opportunities to 4 find learnings. 5 Okay. So the origin...

AI summary The text discusses an updated forecast and cost increase for a project related to Identity and Access Management, with a reference to a capital application filed on March 17, 2026, and a comparison to previous estimates in the 2026 ACE Plan.

1 A. (Beaton) Absolutely. If we were
1 A. (Beaton) Absolutely. If we were 2 to have a very granular definition of scope to include 3 asset quantity and very project-specific details, the 4 expectation is that there would be a large increase in the 5 number of filings for proj...

AI summary The discussion focuses on the definition and implementation of a 'Project Scope' section in capital applications, emphasizing that the level of detail in projects remains unchanged, and that scope change applications have been rare, with only one example cited.

1 And it's also important that a large
NS POWER PANEL 277 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 And it's also important that a large 3 from the intent of the durational filing of a capital 4 project. 5 Q. When you say very, very rarely, 6 in the last 10 years are you able to tell me whether NSP...

AI summary The discussion centers on whether NSPI has varied from the intent of capital project applications in the past 10 years, with the witness acknowledging the possibility but unable to recall specific instances. An undertaking is proposed to review past filings for scope changes.

NS POWER PANEL 353 Cr-ex, (Mahody)
NS POWER PANEL 353 Cr-ex, (Mahody) 1 units. 2 In terms of the specific criteria that 3 were used to select these, I wouldn't have the specifics, 4 but I could say that it does definitely include looking at 5 the ability to reduce that outa...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the selection criteria for outage response improvements and the need to update a capital spending forecast figure for 2025. The importance of RTU functionality in reducing response times and the need for updated financial data are highlighted.

NS POWER PANEL 355 Cr-ex, (Mahody)
NS POWER PANEL 355 Cr-ex, (Mahody) 1 produce? 1 13.6 million that you'll see here, is 126 percent higher 2 than that 6 million spent in 2025. 3 A. (Beaton) Correct. I'd have to 4 dig in to see what the variance of obviously the 6 5 million...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the comparison of spending figures between 2025 and a previous forecast, highlighting a discrepancy between the reported $6 million and the forecasted $9.5 million. The parties involved are examining the reasons for the variance, with a specific focus on transmission line replacements and modifications.

20260422-1Hearing Transcript — 04/22/2026 (Revised Transcript - Refiled May 20, 2026) 19 passages
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD
NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF: THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF: OF A GENERAL RATE APPLICATION BY NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED (NS Power) for approval of approximately $284 million of its ANNUAL CAPITAL EXPEN...

AI summary The Nova Scotia Energy Board is considering a general rate application by Nova Scotia Power Incorporated (NS Power) for approval of its 2026 Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan, which totals approximately $702.1 million.

I N D E X O F P R O C E E D I N G S
I N D E X O F P R O C E E D I N G S PAGE NO. 17 18 19 20 21 Energy storage is included in the transmission function for the purposes of capital tracking. However, from a cost-of service perspective, these assets have been proposed to be re...

AI summary The text discusses the classification of energy storage assets for capital tracking purposes, with a question raised about why they are not functionalized to generation. The response explains that energy storage sites are managed under long-term service agreements similar to wind farms and will remain classified under transmission for capital tracking.

Section 20
1 go to PDF page 166, then. 2 And Ms. Drover, in this this is 3 Board IR-69 I may have the wrong page there, Rob. It's 4 Board IR-69(a). 5 Sorry; it's in Exhibit N-6, Rob. PDF 6 page 166. 7 BY MEMBER MURPHY: 8 [9:10:03] Q. So in that Board...

AI summary Member Murphy refers to Board IR-69(a)(i), where the Board requested Nova Scotia Power to provide an EAM and a Net Present Value analysis for three options: combi-wall, retaining wall, and a selected rock revetment option. The EAM would include capital and operating costs for these options.

NS POWER PANEL 403 Questions, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 403 Questions, (Murphy) 1 particular report, the Options Analysis Report, didn't 2 look at any work scheduling. And perhaps I don't know 3 perhaps Option 2, again notwithstanding your contention 4 about its viability, perhap...

AI summary The discussion focuses on the Options Analysis Report and the lack of consideration of work scheduling, particularly regarding Option 2 and the need for cooling water intake extension. There is a mention of increased costs due to work during an outage and the potential for re-evaluation of options using collected data.

NS POWER PANEL 411 Questions, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 411 Questions, (Murphy) 1 MEMBER MURPHY: Rob, can you call up 2 Exhibit N-3? That's Response to CA IRs, PDF page 21. And 3 it's response to 11(a). Right there. 4 BY MEMBER MURPHY: 5 It says: Q. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Manu...

AI summary Member Murphy is questioning the timeline for the delivery of replacement blades for a project, citing discrepancies between the response to 11(a) and the ACE Plan Application. The response indicates that blades were ordered in May 2025 and delivered in time for work to start, though the exact delivery date is not specified.

1 A. (Drover) In this case we did not
1 A. (Drover) In this case we did not 2 receive a quote on a previously refurbished engine. 3 However, in recent years we have purchased a previous 4 refurbished engine, and we are aware of the cost of those 5 engines on the market and reg...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the decision to refurbish an engine rather than purchase a previously refurbished one, citing cost considerations and risks associated with incomplete records and maintenance history of used engines. The speaker references industry experience and variability in prices from IR-102.

NS POWER PANEL 425 Questions, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 425 Questions, (Murphy) 1 we still really need all of that additional capacity 2 that's still currently on the system, which would include 3 those diesel CTs. 4 How quickly could you get this Q. 5 leased engine? How quickly...

AI summary Member Murphy questions the status and delays of the Marshall Falls Project, which was approved in 2020 but has seen minimal spending over five years. He references capital spending data from the ACE Plan and asks for an explanation of the project's progress.

NS POWER PANEL 429 Questions, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 429 Questions, (Murphy) 1 estimated cost was 13.8 million. And now we're in 2 February of 2026 and the cost has gone up, let's call it, 3 two million. 4 What's the reason for that increase in 5 less than two months? 6 (Drove...

AI summary The text discusses a cost increase in the Tailrace Rock Bolting Project, attributing the increase to ongoing work in 2025 and reforecasting efforts. The discussion also touches on the timing of cost projections, noting that estimates were based on earlier forecasts from the summer rather than updated ones from December.

NS POWER PANEL 433 Questions, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 433 Questions, (Murphy) 1 and we are creating a new right-of-way anywhere from 10 to 2 15 to 20 feet on the forest side of the line. 3 And then all future work in that space 4 will be maintained through our Tree Trimming Pro...

AI summary The discussion focuses on the creation of a new right-of-way for Nova Scotia Power, which is considered a capital expenditure and involves multiyear benefits for customers. The right-of-way is not owned by Nova Scotia Power but is maintained through the Tree Trimming Program. The topic also touches on accounting practices and the handling of outage events by year.

NS POWER PANEL 437 Questions, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 437 Questions, (Murphy) 1 So as a part of this capital 2 initiative in the new right-of-way program, we're showing 3 the condition improvement on work completed under this 4 program in 2024. It's the last full year we would...

AI summary The text discusses a capital initiative under the new right-of-way program, focusing on condition improvements completed in 2024 and the need to provide information on tree contacts and outage events for feeders where vegetation management was conducted. It references the Annual Capital Expenditure (ACE) Plan and the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP).

NS POWER PANEL 455 Questions, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 455 Questions, (Murphy) 1 (Beaton) Just for a point of A. 9 to the response, Rob. Right there. 10 BY MEMBER MURPHY: 11 It says: Q. 12 13 14 15 The total kilometres completed in 2024 on the capital program is 940 [kilometres]...

AI summary The text discusses a proceeding involving NS Power and the submission of data related to capital expenditures in 2024, including the total kilometres completed and associated costs. It also references an undertaking to provide a table in response to a question from the IR-132, as well as a previous discussion about wind speed data.

NS POWER PANEL 497 Questions, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 497 Questions, (Murphy) 1 Q. Okay. Thank you. 2 Okay. Just a few more questions. I 3 think we'll be done shortly, at least from my end. 4 I have some questions, probably again 5 for you, Ms. Drover, on hydro and I maybe have...

AI summary The proceeding discusses changes in the estimated costs of the Wreck Cove T1 Tunnel Remediation Project from $40.7 million to $17.2 million between last year's ACE Plan and this year's ACE Plan. The witness explains that the change is based on updated understanding of the tunnel's condition and the scope of work. The project is expected to be submitted for approval in 2028 at the earliest.

NS POWER PANEL 503 Questions, (Murphy)
NS POWER PANEL 503 Questions, (Murphy) 1 engagement and stakeholder process to really understand 15 Okay. When you do that initial 16 assessment, you're going to compare the refurbishment 17 costs which have, you know, been developed prett...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the accuracy of cost estimates for decommissioning, with a comparison between Class 5 estimates and those with lower uncertainty. Concerns are raised about the fairness of comparing estimates with significantly different ranges of uncertainty.

Section 120
INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS 1 with various proponents, so I would expect that the filing 2 would happen in Q3, into Q4 potentially. So our plan was 3 to file in 2026. 4 Q. And I just want to make sure I 5 heard t...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the timing of a filing related to a capital project, with an estimated $1 million already spent. The conversation also touches on the remaining coal plant conversion plans by Nova Scotia Power.

NS POWER PANEL 547 Questions, (Chair)
NS POWER PANEL 547 Questions, (Chair) 1 So while we certainly have, you know, 16 That's correct. A. 17 And you've given evidence, by my Q. 18 count, in over 25 matters before this Board and its 19 predecessor on behalf of the Consumer Advo...

AI summary The text discusses a regulatory proceeding involving Nova Scotia Power and the qualification of Mr. Wilson, who has appeared before the Board multiple times. It references his involvement in over 25 matters before the Board and its predecessor, including testimony on Annual Capital Expenditure Plans.

Section 137
recommend reducing the default contingency from 15 percent to 10 percent for projects without a risk matrix. Would allowing a 15 percent blanket contingency across several capital projects without specific risk justification contribute to...

AI summary The discussion centers on the impact of setting a 15 percent blanket contingency for capital projects without specific risk justification, particularly concerning asset inflation and mitigation strategies. The response suggests that increasing contingency does not directly lead to more assets in the rate base and explains the advantages of setting an appropriate contingency level.

Section 145
INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS Could you name any other areas where aspects of Nova Scotia Power's operations that you don't feel achieve this? A. Another area that I continue to have concerns with is the civil aspe...

AI summary The witness expresses concerns about cost overruns in Nova Scotia Power's civil aspects of hydroelectric projects, citing examples such as Tusket, Marshall Falls, and Gaspereau. These projects have experienced significant budget overruns, prompting ongoing scrutiny.

Section 151
d that would trigger ATOs, and so I think the Board might look at those projects and think about which of those kind of represents scope changes and which of those represent more just incremental cost WILSON Cr-ex, (Kayter) INTERNATIONAL R...

AI summary The discussion focuses on Nova Scotia Power's tracking of labor hours for capital projects and its potential impact on cost per new customer. The witness highlights a discrepancy in the information provided regarding Nova Scotia Power's tracking practices.

Section 163
sort of say that there's a single percent that one can say is the amount of cost escalation for a specific approved capital project that can be expected to be reasonable and then, Cr-ex, (Kayter) INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COUR...

AI summary The discussion revolves around cost escalation for approved capital projects and the need for cost containment measures to mitigate overruns. The witness suggests that cost containment strategies and third-party reviews of reliability plans could help address the issue.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →