Topic:"Climate Adaptation" in M09096

Selected Publications - 2018 Pennsylvania's Solar Future Plan: Strategies to Increase Electricity Generation from In-state Solar Energy. Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, November. Led the VEIC team that conducted the sc...

AI summary Selected publications focus on energy efficiency, solar energy, and policy initiatives from 2000 to 2018. Key contributors include the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), and Vermont Energy Investment Corporation (VEIC). Topics include solar market development, renewable energy assessments, and climate policy recommendations.

Leadership 2017 – present Energy Coop of Vermont, Board Member and Treasurer. 2013 Solar 2013, "Power Forward, Baltimore Maryland." Chair of Conference Advisory Committee responsible for recruiting and coordinating four main conference ple...

AI summary The document outlines an individual's leadership roles in renewable energy and policy from 2000 to 2017, including positions at Energy Coop of Vermont, Solar 2013, American Solar Energy Society (ASES), World Renewable Energy Forum, Vermont Governor's Climate Change Committee, and Renewable Energy Vermont. Key contributions include chairing conferences, policy committees, and advisory groups focused on solar energy and climate initiatives.

number, the last day of that sixth month. On publication (2) Sections 3, 4 and 38 to 41 come into force on the day on which these Regulations are published in the Canada Gazette, Part II. REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT (This statemen...

AI summary The regulatory impact analysis statement outlines the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, particularly from Canada's building sector. It highlights national policies and strategies aimed at improving energy efficiency and aligning regulations with the U.S. to reduce regulatory burden, leading to energy cost savings and environmental benefits for Canadians.

ttps://www.canada.ca/en/treasury­board­ secretariat/corporate/transparency/acts­regulations/canada­us­regulatory­cooperation­council/joint­forward­plan­ august­2014.html) 5 Canada’s 7th National Communication and 3rd Biennial Report to the...

AI summary The text references Canada’s climate change reports and regulatory cooperation initiatives, including appliance energy efficiency standards and metrics like IEER and EER. It cites regulations and studies on the impact of energy efficiency programs and GHG emissions reductions.

tatutory authority Energy Efficiency Act Sponsoring department Department of Natural Resources REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT (This statement is not part of the Regulations.) Executive summary Issues: Greenhouse gases are primary con...

AI summary The document outlines the importance of reducing greenhouse gas emissions through energy efficiency, particularly in the building sector. It references national policies such as the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change and highlights the need for improved energy efficiency standards to achieve Canada’s emissions reduction targets by 2030.

approach, the federal government committed to set new standards for heating equipment and other key technologies to the highest level of efficiency that is economically and technically achievable. This commitment builds on the August 2016...

AI summary The federal government committed to setting new energy efficiency standards for heating equipment and other technologies to the highest economically and technically achievable levels. This aligns with the Energy and Mines Ministers’ Conference and the Canadian Energy Strategy, aiming to reduce building sector energy consumption and GHG emissions. A 2018 report by the Generation Energy Council emphasized energy efficiency's role in meeting Canada's emission reduction targets.

f these goals. It would also lead to missed opportunities to reduce energy consumption, leaving consumers and businesses with higher energy costs for heating associated with the building sector. The status quo option would not deliver on t...

AI summary The status quo and voluntary approach options fail to meet federal and provincial goals for energy efficiency, including the 2025 target for heating equipment. The status quo does not align with the Pan-Canadian Framework on Clean Growth and Climate Change, while the voluntary approach would not sufficiently reduce GHG emissions or energy consumption.

lue of avoided climate change damages at the global level — for current and future generations — as a result of reducing GHG emissions. Assumptions Key assumptions include the following: Analysis covers shipments impacted by the proposed R...

AI summary The analysis estimates the value of avoided climate change damages globally due to reduced GHG emissions. It uses assumptions such as a 3% real discount rate, Canadian energy prices from 2017, and the social cost of carbon. It also assumes that incremental costs of efficient technology remain constant, despite potential cost reductions from economies of scale.

S and labelling programs are among the most cost­effective GHG emissions reduction policies and are the cornerstone of energy efficiency and climate change programs in more than 80 countries. 2 Policy context Canada committed to reduce its...

AI summary Energy efficiency and labelling programs are key GHG reduction strategies, supported by international efforts and Canadian commitments under the Paris Agreement. The Pan-Canadian Framework outlines actions for the building sector, including improving new and existing buildings, supporting Indigenous communities, and enhancing appliance efficiency.

xisting buildings, as well as fuel switching; (3) supporting building codes and energy­efficient housing in Indigenous communities; and (4) improving energy efficiency for appliances and equipment. In June 2018, the Generation Energy Counc...

AI summary The text discusses the role of energy efficiency in reducing GHG emissions, particularly in the building sector. It highlights the importance of energy efficiency in meeting Canada's emission reduction targets and improving economic competitiveness. The building sector is identified as a significant contributor to GHG emissions, with specific attention to residential and commercial buildings.

l energy use, a lack of capacity within organizations to understand and manage energy use, and split incentives (e.g. landlords may not purchase efficient equipment if tenants pay the energy bill). In 2011, the Canada–United States Regulat...

AI summary The document discusses the need for regulatory action to address energy inefficiency, split incentives, and regulatory differences between Canada and the U.S. The objectives of the Amendment include reducing GHG emissions, energy consumption, and unnecessary regulatory differences to support cross-border trade.

of this goal. It would also lead to missed opportunities to reduce energy consumption, leaving households and businesses with higher energy costs for heating associated with the building sector. Since 2011, the U.S. Department of Energy ha...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of maintaining energy efficiency regulations to reduce energy consumption and GHG emissions, noting that the U.S. has updated its standards while Canada has not. It also outlines the consequences of repealing the Regulations, including missed opportunities for emission reductions and higher energy costs.

al_reports/application/pdf/4623051_canada­ br3­nc7­1­5108_eccc_can7thncomm3rdbi­report_en_04_web.pdf)to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, p. 145. 8 https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury­board­secretariat/corporate/tran...

AI summary The text references various regulatory and environmental documents, including reports to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Canada-US Regulatory Cooperation Council's joint action plan, and regulations related to greenhouse gas emissions. It also cites a study on appliance energy efficiency standards and their global impact.

Table 1 Update on Implementation of 2013-2016 Evaluation Recommendations Year Evaluation/ Verification Recommendation Text Source Status Comments Expected Period of Completion 2016 Verification ENS and the Advisory Group should consider in...

AI summary In 2016, a recommendation was made to consider discussions between ENS and the Advisory Group on the intersection of DSM and climate adaptation in new construction. However, EfficiencyOne (E1) believes this is beyond the scope of the UARB-approved Supply Agreement and would act upon further direction from the UARB.

Vision Statement To be a world leader in developing truthful measurement and useful results; to support development of efficient, ethical, and effective practices, sustained economically; to advance human development. To improve the qualit...

AI summary The Vision Statement outlines goals to lead in truthful measurement and impactful results, promote efficient and ethical practices, advance human development, and enhance quality of life amid climate change. It emphasizes sustainability, economic viability, and climate resilience as core priorities.

F. Addressing Climate Mitigation & Climate Adaptation Evaluation of climate change aspects of DSM has two parts. First, evaluation of the role of program components in climate mitigation. Second, evaluation of the role of program component...

AI summary The document evaluates DSM programs' climate mitigation and adaptation roles. Econoler's 2018 analysis quantifies GHG emission reductions but notes climate adaptation wasn't scoped in 2018. Climate adaptation is framed as an intergenerational value stream, distinct from DSM's short-term focus. Passive House is highlighted as a model integrating energy efficiency and resilience. DSM measures (except new construction) avoid long-term 'lock-in' issues.

G. Highlighted Evaluation Standards In this section we highlight five guidelines or standards for evaluation: independence, avoiding the risk of circularity in using automated evaluation, 20 P a g e 15 The "look-ahead" for a DSM Integrated...

AI summary The document outlines five evaluation standards, emphasizing independence, transparency, and long-term planning. It contrasts DSM's 20-30 year planning horizon with climate adaptation's 220-600 year timeframe, warning against short-term 'low-hanging fruit' strategies that may lock in suboptimal solutions. An example highlights a US utility's shift to oil-fired generation due to short-term cost considerations, leading to long-term inefficiencies.

III. General Findings There is one general finding for this Savings Verification study: SVF-1: All 2018 evaluations conducted by Econoler are within accepted industry frameworks and evaluation standards. - Each program evaluation is compre...

AI summary The 2018 Savings Verification study by Econoler is deemed compliant with industry standards, featuring comprehensive evaluations with transparent methodologies. Key strengths include independent analysis, market evolution insights for LEDs, climate mitigation assessments, and avoidance of circularity in results through critical eTRM usage.

13. FORCE MAJEURE - 13.1 Neither Party shall be in breach of its obligations under this Agreement where failure to perform or delay in performance of any obligation is due, wholly or in part, to a Force Majeure Event. - 13.2 Each Party sha...

AI summary The section outlines Force Majeure provisions, stating that neither party is in breach if performance is hindered by such events. Parties must notify each other, mitigate impacts, and resume performance. EfficiencyOne's failures or negligence are excluded from Force Majeure considerations.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-16: Referring to rows 20 through 27 on page 81 and rows 1-15 on page 82 of Appendix A, for each of the following new initiatives, please indicate when more information will be available regarding the roll out, w...

AI summary The document requests details on eight initiatives, including AMI testing, net-zero options, and DSM programs. EfficiencyOne responds to one initiative, outlining plans to research service delivery approaches for commercial buildings. The response highlights dynamic energy management goals but lacks full details on timelines, success criteria, or plan differences.

ommended in the 2014 IRP. The Board considered that this met the test of affordability "...while at the same time recognizing the overarching principle of what is in the best interests of ratepayers." [26] The Consensus Agreement maintains...

AI summary The document discusses DSM spending levels for 2020-2022, comparing the Consensus Agreement and Preferred Plan. The Board found the Consensus Agreement affordable but noted concerns about insufficient spending for climate-resilient energy efficiency. E1 supported the Preferred Plan, aligning with the 2014 IRP, while EAC and AEC argued for higher funding due to climate change impacts. The Board acknowledged stakeholder support for increased spending.

Request IR-13 What would be the greenhouse gas reductions achieved from full implementation of the economic DSM potential identified? What would be the reductions from a full implementation of the technical potential?

AI summary Request IR-13 seeks quantification of greenhouse gas reductions achievable through full implementation of economic and technical DSM potential. The inquiry focuses on Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power) and EfficiencyOne (E1), with DSM (Demand Side Management) as the central program under evaluation.

ommended in the 2014 IRP. The Board considered that this met the test of affordability "...while at the same time recognizing the overarching principle of what is in the best interests of ratepayers." [26] The Consensus Agreement maintains...

AI summary The Board evaluated DSM spending levels for 2020-2022, noting the Consensus Agreement's spending aligns with past underspending but faces criticism for being insufficient. E1 supported the Preferred Plan due to future program challenges, while EAC and AEC argued higher spending is needed for climate resilience. The Board observed mixed support, with some stakeholders emphasizing the need for updated IRP guidance.