064632010 DSM Evaluation Reports 2/28/2011
59 passages
respondents (29%) reported that participation in the SBLS program actions after participating in the SBLS program. The DSM had influenced them to take additional actions on their own. When Administrator should consider expanding program of...
AI summary Respondents participating in the SBLS program reported that it influenced them to take additional energy efficiency actions. However, nearly half of respondents indicated they were unaware of additional measures, highlighting a need for expanded program offerings to help small businesses identify and pursue further energy efficiency opportunities.
areas to partner with the program. Telephone outreach. The telephone calls made by trained representatives generate interest among potential participants. On-site visits. Sufficient training is provided to representatives that visit cu...
AI summary The text outlines the implementation of the Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program, highlighting methods such as telephone outreach, on-site visits, and installation of energy-efficient lighting products like CFLs and LEDs in small businesses across Nova Scotia.
Transfer of understanding. Small business owners will remember the energy and bill savings they realized from participating in the program and consider energy efficient options when making decisions to purchase other energy using equipme...
AI summary The document discusses the DI program's impact on small businesses, highlighting benefits like energy savings and awareness, as well as barriers such as liability concerns, perceptions of quality, and inaccessibility of equipment. It also outlines short-term outcomes, including awareness through marketing and customer participation in installations.
cipate in the NSPI rebate programs? [Probe: Save energy, rebates offered, reduce maintenance costs, protect environment, recommended by utility, concerns with carbon, etc.] 12. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in making...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at understanding the experiences and challenges of participants in NSPI rebate programs, including barriers to participation, issues encountered, and satisfaction levels with various programs and interactions with NSPI staff.
st heard about the program through a contractor, a vendor or word of mouth. Nearly one in four (23%) respondents said they had first heard about the program through a recreation facility association.9 Table 3-2: Source of First Awareness o...
AI summary The text discusses how participants in the C&I Custom Program first became aware of it, with sources including word of mouth, contractors, and recreation facility associations. A table provides data on awareness sources across different years, with a note that the recreation facility association was a curling rink association.
ng the measures. (Table 3-4) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page 20
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on measures outlined in Table 3-4. The text is attributed to NMR, suggesting their involvement in the evaluation process.
building envelope measures responded to the 2010 survey. (Table 3-6) 10 Note that the program makes no distinction between non-profit and for profit companies. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page 22
AI summary The text references a 2010 survey on building envelope measures and mentions that the program does not differentiate between non-profit and for-profit companies. It also references a table and a page number from an evaluation report.
516 56.5 80.7 24.2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A12
AI summary The text provides a brief evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, likely involving metrics or performance data, though the specific details are not elaborated in the provided text.
ans, fan coils, HRVs, etc.). This NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A25
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on its implementation and effectiveness in promoting energy efficiency among commercial and industrial customers.
0 27.0 27.0 0.0 NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A28 Project Overview Table 2 provides a list of the refrigeration equipment by location. These fans, compressors, and door heaters operate with the beverage coolers in the stor...
AI summary The document provides an overview of a project evaluating the 2010 C&I Custom Program, specifically detailing refrigeration equipment in Truro and Bedford. It includes technical specifications such as volts, amps, phase, number of units, and COP for various equipment types.
retrofitted on a 1-for-1 basis. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A41
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on retrofitting on a 1-for-1 basis. It appears to be a part of a larger evaluation process, likely related to energy efficiency or utility programs.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A45 Table 3: Summary of Removed Fixtures
AI summary The document provides a summary of removed fixtures under the 2010 C&I Custom Program, as outlined in Table 3. The table likely details the fixtures that were removed during the evaluation process.
(1) NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A47 where,
AI summary The text references an evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, though no further details or analysis are provided in the excerpt.
tments were made as necessary. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A64
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on its performance and outcomes. Key aspects include program effectiveness, participant feedback, and overall impact on energy efficiency in commercial and industrial sectors.
following three combinations: NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A85
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 C&I Custom Program, focusing on its performance and impact within the Nova Scotia regulatory proceeding context.
person in your company / organization who is most knowledgeable about your experience with the Commercial and Industrial Custom Program? Yes (If YES go to Q5) No 4. We would like to talk to the person who is the most knowledgeable about yo...
AI summary The text includes a questionnaire aimed at identifying the most knowledgeable person in a company about the Commercial and Industrial Custom Program. It also asks about prior participation in Nova Scotia Power energy efficiency programs before the Commercial and Industrial Custom Program.
you installed or pursued through the Commercial and Industrial Custom program? 1. Yes 2. No 3. Don‘t know [IF Q17 = NO / DON‘T KNOW FOR EVERY MEASURE GO TO Q20] IF Q16=YES: Q17. Was equipment of the same level or a higher level of efficien...
AI summary This text is a series of survey questions related to energy efficiency measures, specifically asking whether equipment was purchased and installed independently by the respondent and whether it met or exceeded the efficiency levels of equipment installed through the Commercial and Industrial Custom program.
1. Yes Measure x _ _ _% 2. No 9. Don’t know 20. Has your participation in the Commercial and Industrial Custom Program influenced other energy efficiency actions that your company / organization has taken? 1. Yes. We have implemented addit...
AI summary The text is part of a survey assessing whether participation in the Commercial and Industrial Custom Program influenced additional energy efficiency actions, including measures like energy management systems, insulation, and behavior changes. It lists possible implemented or pursued measures.
ts to your company / organization? [9=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] 29. What percent of your annual operating budget do energy costs account for? [999=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] % 30. Do you have any suggestions on how to improve the Commercial a...
AI summary The text includes survey questions for organizations regarding energy costs and program improvements, with a reference to an evaluation of the 2010 Commercial and Industrial Custom Program by NMR.
9. Don‘t know/Don‘t recall NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page C17
AI summary The text references a section titled 'Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program' on page C17, but the content is minimal and consists of a placeholder response ('Don't know/Don't recall') and the entity 'NMR'.
Theory and Logic Model Review: 9. Is the program theory and logic model included in the C&I program manual still valid? 10. Has the program been expanded to include participants other than larger commercial, industrial and municipal custom...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions regarding the validity and scope of a Commercial and Industrial (C&I) program, its outreach efforts, and its goals, including whether it functions as a Resource Acquisition or Market Transformation program. It also explores short-term and intermediate goals, as well as the program's impact on the market.
21. For the C&I program, how has the involvement of contractors changed since last year? [Probe: Have contractors taken a more active role in program marketing?] [Probe: in the program logic model NSPI has identified that trade allies and...
AI summary The text contains a series of questions directed at Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) regarding the Commercial and Industrial (C&I) energy efficiency program, including contractor involvement, program impacts, customer targeting, program interactions, and gaps in coverage. It also references a review of 2008 recommendations and asks for an assessment of the program's strengths and weaknesses.
eract with at NSPI? a. What types of interactions do you typically have with NSPI staff? [Probe: status calls, meetings, etc.] Could these interactions be improved? How so? 6. Some companies work with a design professional, project archite...
AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at understanding interactions with NSPI, the use of design professionals in project design, and the program delivery process for the C&I Custom and BER programs. It focuses on participation in various stages of the process and identifies potential barriers to program participation.
t pose a barrier to participation in the C&I Custom program? [Probes: Assistance, availability, or interaction with program staff; requirements of any of the four-steps;] The BER program was designed to streamline the rebate process for C&...
AI summary The text discusses the Business Energy Rebate (BER) program and its implementation by C&I customers, highlighting the simplicity of the BER compared to the C&I Custom program. It also explores participant experiences, identifying potential barriers and motivations for participation in energy efficiency programs.
5 9 no extremely DK influence influential Spillover Now I‘d like you to think about any energy efficient equipment or upgrades that your company is currently pursuing or has installed in the past two years on its own. These measures could...
AI summary The text asks respondents to consider energy-efficient equipment and upgrades implemented or pursued by their company in the past two years, including whether they were installed independently or through rebate programs, and the expected electricity savings in 2010.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page III
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on its implementation and outcomes. It provides an overview of the program's goals, strategies, and performance, highlighting key findings and recommendations for improvement.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page IV Findings and Recommendations Finding Recommendation SBLS-F7. SBLS-R7. While nearly all of the 2010 respondents (63 out of 65) said they would Despite the importance o...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program found that while most respondents were likely to purchase energy-efficient equipment in the future, few reported taking additional energy efficiency measures after participating in the program. The main barriers cited were lack of knowledge and information about additional measures.
ved in 2010. In 2009, Delivery Agents were required to box and ship lamps from outlying regions. In 2010, the Recycling Contractor coordinated the pickup of lamps and ballasts throughout the province. 1.1.1 Program Theory Program Backgroun...
AI summary The SBLS program aims to assist small businesses with lighting retrofits by reducing installation costs and offering interest-free financing. The program involves customer screening, outreach, material arrangement, and on-site lighting audits conducted by Delivery Agents.
udits of participants‘ facilities. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 2
AI summary The document discusses the evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on audits of participants' facilities.
achieve improved lighting quality. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 3 Increase in demand for energy efficient lighting equipment. Participants who install energy efficiency lighting recognize its bene...
AI summary The document discusses the long-term outcomes of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, including sustained energy savings, emission reductions, and the adoption of energy-efficient practices by small businesses. It outlines the program's logic model and evaluates its impact.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 5 2 Impact Evaluation
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on its impact. It is part of a broader analysis of energy efficiency initiatives.
34,035 100 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 7
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on its implementation and outcomes. It includes data and analysis related to the program's impact and performance.
al %20Lighting%20Program.pdf NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 8
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on its implementation and outcomes. It includes details on program performance and participant feedback.
ulate savings were the same as those used in 2008. Given this consistency and the similarity in measure mix installed, we believe the transfer of the 2008 realization rate – which was driven primarily by wattage changes due to spot watts –...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program's energy and demand savings are evaluated using realization rates from 2008. The results show installed annual energy savings of 12,052 MWh at the meter and 12,944 MWh at the generator, with connected demand savings of 3,712.7 kW and 3,987.5 kW, respectively.
ce from another DSM program. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 10 participating in the SBLS program, and only four of these respondents said the equipment was of the same efficiency or higher than had be...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program found a very low spillover rate (<1%), with some participants reporting non-like spillover. The spillover rate was calculated based on additional lighting installed and estimated savings from program records. However, without follow-up inspections, the actual efficiency and savings from spillover could not be determined.
8, and Table 2-9) NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 11
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on its implementation and outcomes. It includes a reference to Nova Scotia Power (NMR) and mentions the Small Business Lighting Program (SBLS) as part of the evaluation.
g material disposal and/or recycling NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 19
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on material disposal and recycling practices. It is authored by NMR and discusses program effectiveness and environmental impact.
sentative 10 8 NSPI (unspecified mode of contact) 2 NSPI e-mail 2 NSPI bill insert 2 †ϐ Don‘t know 9 Other 2 13 Throughout this report, the symbol ‗σ‘ is used to indicate that results between 2008 and 2009 participants are significantly di...
AI summary The report evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program, noting that about half of the respondents had previously purchased energy-efficient lighting products, with a majority purchasing CFLs and retrofitting T-12 lighting with T8s or T5s.
ad previously purchased energy efficient products, more than seven out of ten (71%) reported having purchased CFLs and two-fifths (20%) reported retrofitting T-12 lighting with T8s or T5s. (Table 3-4) Table 3-4: Prior Purchases of Efficien...
AI summary The text discusses the purchase of energy-efficient lighting products by respondents in 2008, 2009, and 2010, with a focus on CFLs and retrofitting T-12 lighting with T8s or T5s. It also notes that about two-fifths of 2010 respondents had prior plans for lighting improvements before engaging with the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program.
fic plans to pursue lighting improvements prior to talking with anyone about the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program— similar to 2008 (42%) and significantly more than in 2009 (22%). (Table 3-5) Table 3-5: Prior Plans to Pursue Light...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program shows that only 12% of participants installed additional energy-efficient lighting post-participation, with only four of these installations matching or exceeding the efficiency of the SBLS program. Participation in the program influenced these additional installations.
1 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 24 Respondents were also asked if participation in the SBLS program had influenced them to pursue additional energy efficiency actions other than lighting improvements...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program found that 29% of respondents indicated participation influenced them to take additional energy efficiency actions beyond lighting improvements, including heating system upgrades, behavior changes, and improvements to ceilings and insulation.
88% Yes 10 10 12 Don‘t know 2 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 28
AI summary The document presents a survey result indicating that 88% of respondents answered 'Yes' to a question, with 10 respondents providing the same answer across different columns. The text also references the Evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program by NMR.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 28
AI summary The document evaluates the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on its effectiveness and outcomes. Key aspects include program performance, participant feedback, and impact on energy efficiency in small businesses.
the effort of applying Work not yet 1 completed Timing and scheduling 1 1 of work to be done Finding out point of 1 contact Required to be here at 1 least one year Issues with building 2 tenants Problems with existing 1 wiring Lack of info...
AI summary The text lists various challenges and issues encountered in the implementation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) Program, including incomplete work, scheduling issues, lack of communication, and problems with building tenants and wiring. It also mentions a lack of information for making informed decisions.
l of the participants (93% or greater) reported that they were satisfied with the different aspects of the lighting equipment installed through the SBLS program, similar to 2008 and 2009. (Table 3-15) Table 3-15: Satisfaction with Lighting...
AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program shows high satisfaction with the lighting equipment installed, with over 90% of participants reporting satisfaction across various aspects. Additionally, 63 out of 65 respondents indicated they would likely purchase energy-efficient equipment in the future.
16 12 19 37 or more 19 18 18 Average months 31.8 25.9 27.3 3.12 Firmographics About three out of four 2010 respondents (74%) reported owning their facilities. (Table 3-21) Table 3-21: Ownership Status of Facilities Status 2008 2009 2010 Sa...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program evaluation indicates that about 74% of respondents owned their facilities, while the remaining 25% leased them. The data spans three years (2008, 2009, and 2010) and shows a consistent ownership rate around 74%.
f 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 34 Respondents in the 2008, 2009 and 2010 samples represented a diverse variety of business types. (Table 3-22)
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program included respondents from a diverse range of business types in the 2008, 2009, and 2010 samples, as detailed in Table 3-22.
ucation 2 Construction 2 Public Library 2 Public order and safety 4 2 Wholesaler 2 Animal shelter 2 Equipment rental 2 Publishing 2 Transportation 2 Other 4 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 35 Eight out...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) Program had a high participation rate among small businesses with facilities under 50,000 square feet, with 80% of respondents falling into this category and nearly half having facilities under 10,000 square feet.
14 More than three out of four 2010 respondents (77%) reported having fewer than 20 employees and three out of five respondents (60%) reported having fewer than 10 employees. (Table 3-24) Table 3-24: Full-time Equivalent Workers 2008 2009...
AI summary The 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program evaluation found that most respondents had fewer than 20 employees and operated less than 80 hours per week, with an average of 60 hours per week. This data is presented in Table 3-24 and Table 3-25.
Scotia Power energy efficiency programs before participating in the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program? 1. Yes 2. No (Go to Q7) 9. Don‘t know (Go to Q7) 5. Which programs did your company / organization participate in prior to the S...
AI summary The text contains survey questions related to participation in Scotia Power energy efficiency programs, specifically asking about prior participation in the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program and other programs. It also includes a question about the years of participation in identified programs.
003 6. 2004 7. 2005 8. 2006 9. 2007 10. 2008 11. 2009 12. 2010 99. (Don‘t Know) 7. How did you first learn about the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program? [RANDOMIZE AND READ 1-8, THEN 9] (choose one) 1. From a phone call from a Small...
AI summary The text presents a survey asking respondents how they learned about the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program and the primary reason for their participation. It includes multiple-choice options for both questions.
e energy efficient lighting ‖ and 5 indicates that the program was ―extremely influential to your decision to install the energy efficient lighting.‖ How influential was / were the: NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions...
AI summary The text evaluates the influence of various factors on the installation of energy-efficient lighting through the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program. It asks participants to rate the influence of NSPI incentives, information provided by program representatives, and NSPI-funded lighting audits on their decision to install the lighting.
aced 3. Use lights the same amount as the lights that were replaced 4. Use the lights more, but instead of other less efficient lights 9. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) SPILLOVER 21. Now I'd like you to think of the time since you participated...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about the usage and impact of energy-efficient lighting upgrades installed through the Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program. It asks participants about their lighting usage, additional upgrades, and the influence of the SBLS program on their decisions.
7. (Decision made elsewhere) 8. (Do not own building – have to work through owner) 9. (Other (Specify: _) ) 99. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) 28. In number of years or months, how quickly does your company / organization require energy efficie...
AI summary The text includes survey questions about energy efficiency payback requirements and satisfaction with the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program. It focuses on customer feedback regarding lighting quality, brightness, and energy savings.
) when installing or replacing energy-using products for your business in the future? [9=Don‘t know/Don‘t recall] Section IV. Barriers to Action & Recommendations for Improvements 32. Does your company / organization own or lease the space...
AI summary This section of the document explores barriers to implementing energy efficiency measures, particularly focusing on the Small Business Lighting Solutions Program. It includes questions about ownership of space, permission from building owners, and challenges faced in implementing program measures.
ding – have to work through owner) NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page B9 l. (Other (Specify: _)) 99. (Don‘t know/Don‘t recall) 38. On a scale of 1 to 5, where 1=‗not at all important‘ and 5=‗very importan...
AI summary The document contains survey questions related to the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program, focusing on the importance of energy usage reduction and cost management for businesses, as well as feedback on improving the program.
_ Section V. Firmographics 42. What is the principal building activity where the energy efficiency improvements were implemented? [DO NOT READ—BUT CONFIRM WITH RESPONDENT THAT THE CATEGORY YOU CHOOSE IS CORRECT] 1. Education 2. Food Sales...
AI summary This section asks respondents to identify the principal building activity where energy efficiency improvements were implemented, with multiple categories provided for selection. The document is part of an evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program.
Since participating in the SBLS program, have you implemented any other energy efficiency measures for any of the SBLS participants that you worked with? [IF NO SKIP TO FIRMOGRAPHICS] 36. Did participation in the SBLS program influence the...
AI summary The text includes questions about the impact of the SBLS program on energy efficiency measures, the types of measures implemented by participants, and suggestions for improving the program. It also includes firmographic questions related to company size and structure.
? [PROBE: lighting, motors, etc] 3. What is your current job title? What roles and responsibilities do you have at [Company]? 4. How did you first become aware of the SBLS program? 5. How often do you interact with NSPI SBLS program staff?...
AI summary The document includes a series of questions directed at program participants regarding their experiences with the SBLS program, including awareness, training, interactions with NSPI, and challenges with product availability and delivery.