Topic:"Compliance Legislation" in M11927

Section 158 of the Environment Act to provide false mation provided in this form and supporting docum nment Act and Regulations. 20 MT - 3 M TRANSPORTER (HEALTH CONTRACTOR FOR MEDICAL PROPERTY CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR CO...

AI summary The text references Section 158 of the Environment Act, which pertains to the provision of false information in documents. However, the content is incomplete and contains repeated, unclear terms such as 'CONTRACTOR' and 'HEALTH CONTRACTOR,' making it difficult to determine the full context or implications of the section being discussed.

Wetlands and Watercourses in Nova Scotia Wetlands in Nova Scotia are regulated by NSE under Section 105 of the Environment Act . Under the Act, wetlands are: Land referred to as a marsh, swamp, fen, or bog that either periodically or perma...

AI summary The document defines wetlands and watercourses in Nova Scotia under the Environment Act. Wetlands are characterized by saturated soil and hydrophytic vegetation, while watercourses include natural bodies of water and groundwater. Definitions also appear in HRM land use by-laws.

Note: A legend must be supplied for all mapping describing symbols used, scale and north orientation. Description Submitted Waiver requested Reason for Waiver 6A - Attach for all applicable Water Applications Proof of Ownership/Agreement/L...

AI summary The document outlines the required submissions for different types of water applications, including proof of ownership, site plans, and environmental assessments. It emphasizes the importance of complete and high-quality documentation to avoid delays or rejections in the application process.

3. General - a. The Approval Holder(s) shall conduct the Designated Activity in accordance with the following provisions: - i. The Act, as amended from time to time; - ii. Any standard adopted by the Department, as amended from time to tim...

AI summary This section outlines the responsibilities and conditions for the Approval Holder(s) in conducting the Designated Activity, emphasizing compliance with legislation, obtaining necessary permits, and adherence to terms and conditions of the Approval. It also details procedures for renewal, amendment, and notification of non-compliance.

3. General - a. The Approval Holder(s) shall conduct the Designated Activity in accordance with the following provisions: - i. The Act, as amended from time to time; - ii. Any standard adopted by the Department, as amended from time to tim...

AI summary This section outlines the responsibilities and conditions for the Approval Holder(s) in conducting the Designated Activity, emphasizing compliance with legislation, obtaining necessary permits, and adherence to terms and conditions of the Approval. It also details procedures for renewal, amendment, and notification of non-compliance.

APPROVAL Province of Nova Scotia Environment Act, S.N.S. 1994-95, c.1 s.1 APPROVAL HOLDER: NOVA SCOTIA POWER INCORPORATED SITE PID: 40221673 APPROVAL NO: 2019-2638165-00 EXPIRY DATE: May 31, 2028 Pursuant to Part V of the Environment Act,...

AI summary The Province of Nova Scotia has granted approval to Nova Scotia Power Incorporated under the Environment Act for the refurbishment of Ruth Falls Dam. The approval is subject to terms and conditions and is valid until May 31, 2028. Kevin G Garroway has been delegated authority to act on behalf of the Minister regarding this approval.

CI 50518 CA IR-5 Attachment 22 Page 4 of 11 REDACTED (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED) - d. If there is a discrepancy between the reference documents and the terms and conditions of this Approval, the terms and conditions of this Approval...

AI summary This document outlines the terms and conditions of an approval, emphasizing compliance, notification requirements, and responsibilities of the Approval Holder. It includes obligations for environmental monitoring, laboratory analysis, construction oversight, and certification by a qualified professional engineer.

4.0 Construction Monitoring NS Power requires that the main civil contractor (or general contractor) develop a site-specific water management and erosion and sedimentation control plan that must align with NS Power's established water mana...

AI summary NS Power requires contractors to develop site-specific environmental plans, including water management and erosion control, which are reviewed by project managers and environmental leads. NS Power also implements its own Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) with regular inspections to ensure compliance. A summary report confirming compliance will be submitted to DFO by December 31, 2025.

6.3.2 Mi'kmaq Engagement - Midgard concludes that the "Additional KMKNO Capacity Payments" increased costs are reasonable, as NS - Power was required to continue consultation with KMKNO as the Project changed. - With respect to the Mi'kmaq...

AI summary Midgard concludes that the Additional KMKNO Capacity Payments are reasonable given NS Power's requirement to continue consultation with KMKNO due to project changes. The costs for Mi'kmaq observers during archaeological work are considered reasonable, though their magnitude is unlikely to have significantly impacted the original decision.

- Response IR-12: - a) Midgard revised its conclusion to clarify the relationship between regulatory changes and project costs. - Midgard determined that while regulatory changes influenced project execution, the associated costs - were mo...

AI summary Midgard revised its conclusion regarding the relationship between regulatory changes and project costs, stating that NS Power acted prudently in response to evolving requirements. The costs were deemed necessary and primarily driven by DFO requirements.

to the potential changes to the Fisheries Act and that the Board and stakeholders should have similarly been made aware of these impending changes and their implications for the project application. [44] The Industrial Group also submitted...

AI summary The Industrial Group submitted that NS Power did not act diligently in advancing project permit applications, leading to a 4.5-year delay in obtaining NSECC approval. The group cited incomplete submissions, failure to anticipate issues, and a phased approach by NS Power as contributing factors. An FAA was submitted over a year after the Board's approval, and an updated package was submitted to DFO in February 2025.

31 1 Request IR-6: 2 Reference: Attachment 1, page 1, row 3. 3 4 5 July 8, 2021 - DFO indicated that due to a change in scope of the project, they will not be providing comments on NS Power's May 8, 2021 submission until an updated constru...

AI summary The text discusses delays in the Ruth Falls project due to a 2021 scope change, and clarifications regarding the project's details, including the replacement of a concrete deck with a steel walkway and increased discharge capacity. It references previous regulatory approvals and submissions.

- 3 Preamble: Midgard has quoted the DFO's letter from July 8, 2021 referencing NSPI's - 4 communication on July 6, 2021. - 5 (a) Has Midgard had an opportunity to review the communication noted from 6 NSPI to the DFO on July 6, 2021 confi...

AI summary The document references a communication from NSPI to the DFO on July 6, 2021, regarding a change in scope and timeline of a project. It asks whether Midgard had the opportunity to review this communication and whether NSPI should have applied to the Board under the CEJC due to the scope change.

4 Request IR-12: 5 Reference: N-8, Original Report, page 13, lines 26-27, and page 14, lines 1-3. Ultimately, Midgard concludes that the changing context of the Fisheries Act and resulting consequences on NS Power's Project execution proce...

AI summary Midgard's report discusses the significant costs imposed on NS Power due to changes in the Fisheries Act and evolving regulatory requirements. The report initially stated that these changes were the primary driver of costs but later revised this to a 'necessary response'. The report also highlights that NS Power acted 'generally prudent' in responding to DFO's requests, though it does not address whether NSPI acted prudently or how it responded to NSECC's requests.

The Fisheries Act amendments were, or ought to have been, contemplated Based on the evidence included in the record of this proceeding, along with concurrent hydro applications of NSPI, NSPI knew or ought to have known about the legislativ...

AI summary The document discusses NSPI's awareness of amendments to the Fisheries Act, particularly the need for a Fisheries Act Authorization (FAA) for the Ruth Falls refurbishment project. It argues that NSPI should have anticipated these legislative changes, even before they received Royal Assent, and incorporated them into its risk assessment and application process.

ge-11-10"> [ 55 ](#page-11-11) Exhibit N-3, NSPI (CA) RIR – 5 Attachment 4. [ 56 ](#page-11-13) Exhibit N-6, NSPI (NSUARB) RIR – 12, Attachment 2. - NSECC requested finalized design drawings and contractor documentation for the project mul...

AI summary NSPI faced delays in obtaining necessary permits from NSECC and DFO due to late submission of documentation, failure to address permitting issues early, and a prolonged phased approach. These delays significantly extended the permitting process, taking years instead of months.

The FAA and Compliance Filing On June 17th, the day before the Board rendered its Decision, NSPI received its FAA.[6](#page-1-4) Two and a half weeks later, on July 4th, NSPI submitted the FAA with a "Compliance Filing" requesting approval...

AI summary On June 17, NSPI received its FAA the day before the Board's decision. On July 4, NSPI submitted the FAA with a Compliance Filing requesting an amended ATO and expedited approval for in-water construction between July 2025 and March 2026. The filing included an economic analysis model and updated approval sheet with a revised ATO amount.

estimated cost of decommissioning the entire Sheet Harbour system, even accounting for inflation. This is suggestive of a much broader issue with the potential for dam decommissioning in Nova Scotia. The Industrial Group expressed similar...

AI summary The document discusses concerns raised by the Industrial Group regarding the estimated costs of decommissioning the Sheet Harbour system and the lack of justification for offsetting unit cost rates used by NS Power. The Industrial Group recommends using the original cost estimate and suggests cost management and reporting requirements.

Board will not consider any requests for additional costs associated with not meeting the March 31, 2026, completion date resulting from claimed delays in receiving Board approval for the current ATO. Both the SBA and Industrial Group subm...

AI summary The Board will not consider additional costs from delays in meeting the March 31, 2026, completion date due to delays in receiving ATO approval. Both the SBA and Industrial Group recommended regular project updates from NS Power, while NS Power believes existing reporting tools are sufficient. The Board agrees that semiannual reporting would be beneficial without creating a regulatory burden.