Home›Confidentiality›M04265›Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Confidentiality" in M04265

Matter: P-871 - Nova Scotia Power Inc. - Application for a Load Retention Rate (2000)
14 passages 11 documents

Confidentiality across all matters →

P-1Application 1 passage
DIRECT EVIDENCE OF CHRISTOPHER HUSKILSON
rant Nova Scotia economy, and allow NSPI to provide more stable - 4 rates to other customers. - 5 To ensure that load retention rates are offered only in circumstances where they are justified, NSPI - 6 proposes that such rates be based on...

AI summary NSPI proposes a two-stage process to implement load retention rates that ensure fairness and confidentiality for customers. The process aims to satisfy the UARB's approval requirements while addressing customer concerns about data privacy.

P-2NSPI (UARB) IR-1 to IR-33; NSPI (Irving Oil) IR-1 to IR-7; NSPI (CBRM) IR-1 to IR-17 - Responses 3 passages
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST
RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST TO: NSUARB FROM: NSPI Question IR-9: In Attachment A, Paragraph ( 6) it is stated that none of the data or analysis used in the implementation of these procedures or the associated results shall be publicly...

AI summary NSPI confirms that the regulatory hearing process for Load Retention Rate contracts is generally closed, and contract terms are not publicly disclosed, as noted in Table A of Mr. Whalen's evidence.

Property of information
Property of information 167 Subject to all applicable legislation, Hydro-Québec undertakes to keep confidential all information provided by the customer related to the present Rate and identified as confidential by said customer.

AI summary Hydro-Québec agrees to keep confidential all information provided by customers related to the present rate and identified as confidential by the customer, in accordance with applicable legislation.

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY RIDER (EER)
nditions of the customer's contract. Contract expiration shall not affect the applicability of any statutory rate cap or any rate cap ccntained in the Joint Petition for Full Settlemerttien in effect. For contracts first effective after De...

AI summary The document outlines the conditions of customer contracts under the Economic Efficiency Rider (EER), including confidentiality requirements and consequences for breaches, such as a 10% increase in the customer's bill for 12 months. It also mentions statutory rate caps that remain applicable even after contract expiration.

P-14Direct Evidence of Jatinder Kumar [Board Consultant] 1 passage
Confidentiality Provision
Confidentiality Provision Q. WHAT ARE YOUR COMMENTS RELATED TO THE NSPI'S PROPOSED ~- CONFIDENTIALITY PROVISION? A. Although it has been my position that knowledge is a prerequisite to competition, I am not opposed to the confidentiality p...

AI summary The respondent supports NSPI's proposed confidentiality provision but emphasizes that customers requesting LR rates must provide all relevant data to NSPI, which should then make that data available to the UARB.

07373Board Decision 1 passage
CONFIDENTIALITY
CONFIDENTIALITY NSPI proposes that item 6 of the procedures set forth under Attachment A to the Load Retention Rate would read as follows: (6) To protect confidential NSPI and customer data, none of the data or analysis used in the impleme...

AI summary NSPI proposes confidentiality for data and analysis used in implementing the Load Retention Rate, citing concerns from customers about public disclosure of sensitive information. Stora Enso supports this, and Dr. Rosenberg's testimony is referenced. NSPI suggests a closed approval process involving only NSPI, the customer, and the DARB.

07373Board Decision 1 passage
CONFIDENTIALITY
CONFIDENTIALITY NSPI proposes that item 6 of the procedures set forth under Attachment A to the Load Retention Rate would read as follows: (6) To protect confidential NSPI and customer data, none of the data or analysis used in the impleme...

AI summary NSPI proposes confidentiality for data and analysis used in implementing a rate, arguing that customers fear public disclosure of sensitive information. Stora Enso supports this, and Dr. Rosenberg's testimony is referenced. NSPI suggests a closed approval process involving only NSPI, the customer, and the DARB.

07380Post-Hearing Brief - NSPI 2 passages
CONFIDENTIALITY
CONFIDENTIALITY Mr. Huskilson states in his evidence8 : "The big concern that customers have, however, relates to the implementation of this principle, particularly with respect to confidentiality of data. Establishing that the fundamental...

AI summary The document discusses concerns and positions regarding the confidentiality of customer data in the context of rate implementation. Witnesses express concerns about public disclosure of sensitive information, while NSPI emphasizes the need for confidentiality to ensure fair negotiations and customer participation.

Confidential Information
Confidential Information - 21 (1 ) The head of a public body shall refuse to disclose to an applicant information - (a) that would reveal - (i) trade secrets of a third party, or - (ii) commercial, financial, labour relations, scientific o...

AI summary The document discusses the confidentiality of information exchanged during rate negotiations, citing legal provisions that protect trade secrets and sensitive data. It emphasizes that disclosing such information could harm third parties and interfere with negotiations, and asserts that the Board should refuse disclosure as per section 21 of the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

07381Final Argument - CBRM 1 passage
Confidentiality
Confidentiality For the Cape Breton Regional Municipality the issue of confiden1tiality is very much secondary to the other issues discused heretofore. Nevertheless, the importance of the request for confidentiality made by NSPI in th i:~>...

AI summary The text discusses the issue of confidentiality in the context of a proceeding involving NSPI. It argues that confidentiality could be used to hide price discrimination and prevent customers from being aware of the terms of agreements, thereby hindering their ability to object and the Board's ability to reflect the public interest.

07385Closing Submission of Sempra Atlantic Gas 1 passage
E. The confidentiality provision needs to be weighed more towards the public interest.
E. The confidentiality provision needs to be weighed more towards the public interest. During cross-examination by Sempra Atlantic counsel (See Q. 222, pp. 97-99), NSPI agreed that it would provide the detailed information Mr. Kumar says N...

AI summary The document discusses the need for greater transparency in Load Retention (LR) Rate contracts, arguing that public disclosure of summary reports, including customer names and rates, is essential for ensuring fair competition and protecting public interest. NSPI's request for confidentiality is weighed against the need for transparency, with concerns raised about the lack of evidence supporting NSPI's position.

07386Post-Hearing Brief - Stora Enso 1 passage
Confidentiality
Confidentiality The primary motivating factor for self generation is the current reality of cost reduction facing industry competing in a world market. If industry cannot compete effectively, it will not survIve. In assessing the viability...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of confidentiality in Load Retention Rate (LRR) negotiations to encourage customers to remain with the utility rather than self-generate. It argues that disclosing such information could deter businesses from negotiating, as it would expose proprietary and sensitive data, potentially harming their competitive position.

07387NSPI Rebuttal Brief 1 passage
CONFIDENTIALITY
CONFIDENTIALITY Finally, a number ofintervenors raised again the confidentiality issue. NSPI understands this concern however, the rate will not work unless confidentiality is respected. We state again what Mr. Huskilson said at Page 3 of...

AI summary The document discusses concerns raised by intervenors regarding confidentiality in the rate proceeding. NSPI acknowledges the concern but emphasizes the need for confidentiality to ensure the rate works for all customers. It references previous statements and prevailing practices in other jurisdictions.

07391Closing Submission (Rebuttal) - Stora Enso Port Hawkesbury Limited 1 passage
D. The Question ofConfidentiality
D. The Question ofConfidentiality Section E ofthe Sempra Submission (pp. 11 - 12) states that the confidentiality provision needs to be "weighed more towards the public interest". Stora Enso agrees. But the question is, what is in the publ...

AI summary The text discusses the importance of confidentiality in the context of Load Retention Rates, arguing that public interest is best served by protecting customer privacy to encourage negotiation. It emphasizes that confidentiality is necessary to prevent discrimination and ensure fairness, with the Utility and Review Board acting as a watchdog.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →