Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Cost Considerations" in M03330

Matter: CI# 38022 - P-128.10 - NSPI WO - 2010 Recloser Additions - $1,400,271ACE amount $1,400,271179K spent to date
3 passages 1 document

Cost Considerations across all matters →

N-1Redacted Work Order 6/29/2010 3 passages
Section 5 p. p. 1
Summary of Related Cl's +1- 2 years 2009 - 35642 2009 Recloser Additions $1,512,766 Cl Number : 38022 - 2010 Recloser Additions Project Number Parent Cl Number : Approved Date Cost Centre : 800 - 800-Services - Admin. Budget Version 2010 0...

AI summary The text summarizes capital expenditures related to recloser additions in 2009 and 2010, with associated project numbers, cost centers, and budget versions. It includes details such as the parent claim number, approved date, and budget category.

Why do this project this way? p. p. 1
Why do this project this way? Appropriate sectionalizing of a feeder will improve outage statistics. For instance, installing a recloser at 50% of the length of a feeder with 50% of the customer count before and after the recloser will res...

AI summary Sectionalizing feeders with reclosers improves outage metrics (SAIFI, SAIDI) by 25-50%, enhancing reliability and reducing customer interruptions. Cost-benefit analysis shows $40.22/ACI and $60.34/ACHI savings. NSPI will implement this infrastructure upgrade.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 1
NON-CONFIDENTIAL Response IR-D3: (cont'd) 1 2 b) Please refer to Attachment 1. 3 4 5 c) The actual spending up to December 31, 2009 for CI# 35642 2009 Rec10ser Additions is $1,468,464. NSPI is unable to provide the number of rec10surers or...

AI summary The response provides information on actual spending for CI# 35642 2009 Rec10ser Additions up to December 31, 2009, and notes that data for 2008 and 2007 is unavailable as the work was not tracked separately until 2009. A table is referenced for the project estimate cost breakdown.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →