Topic:"Cost Considerations" in M12768

For the Year Ended December 31, 2025 Forecasted CBL Energy Charge ($) Actual CBL Energy Charge ($) Fuel & Purchased Variable Operating & Month Generation Cost Purchase Cost Sale Revenue Start Cost PHP Load CBL Energy Charge Power Charge Ma...

AI summary The document presents a detailed financial summary for the year ended December 31, 2025, including forecasted and actual CBL energy charges, generation costs, purchase costs, and various financial metrics related to PHP load, ADC differentials, and NSPI and PHP benefits. The data spans across 12 months, with monthly breakdowns and an annual total.

1 Request IR-1: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 … The Company has implemented additional reporting metrics and data, as requested in Recommendation XV-3, consistent with the Board's direction in the 2023 Report (M12123), and the Board's M1218...

AI summary The Company has implemented additional reporting metrics as requested by the Board. It is investigating the detailed quantification of load shifting benefits and costs, but progress is affected by the restoration timing of key data platforms. The Company plans to discuss this with the FAM Small Working Group.

Reply Submissions Port Hawkesbury Paper, in its reply submissions, requested that the 2025 ELIADC tariff report be approved as filed. Port Hawkesbury Paper noted there is no cause for concern regarding the Cause Code 5 hours since the 95 h...

AI summary Port Hawkesbury Paper requests approval of the 2025 ELIADC tariff report, noting that the low Cause Code 5 hours and issues related to load forecast revisions and interest on post-year-end balances should be addressed in the new tariff proceeding (M12661). NS Power defends the ELIADC tariff, stating that market conditions, not design flaws, caused the variance between forecast and actual results and that the tariff is an annual settlement mechanism.

(b) Please provide a copy of any FAM SWG presentation materials and 1 2 3 4 2026 M12768 NOVA SCOTIA ENERGY BOARD 11 (c) Does NSPI expect similar inter-year adjustments to persist under the 2026 12 ELIADC tariff? Please explain. 13 Request...

AI summary The document includes several requests related to financial and operational data, including FAM SWG presentations, ELIADC tariff adjustments, and methodology for calculating system costs from schedule deviations. It also asks for explanations of financial notations and whether certain costs represent harms to customers or forgone benefits.

pproximately $6 million per year, the increase in costs borne by PHP, compared to the 2019 application forecast was approximately $30 million per year over the four-year period (i.e. 2020-2023). // • The complexity of the ELIADC Tariff ope...

AI summary The document discusses the performance of the ELIADC Tariff compared to original forecasts, noting a $30 million annual cost increase over 2020-2023. It acknowledges the complexity of tariff operations and market dynamics, and addresses concerns about the adequacy of the minimum payment under the tariff.