Topic:"Cost Deferral" in M04819

Gen. Repl. / Load Foll. 1P-RTP Wholesale Market Backup / Top-up 1 Date Filed: March 30, 2012 ENSC Avon IR-3 Page 8 of 8 2 \ Applies 2012 cost allocation forecast to estimated participation rates for 2012. This is a proxy based on available...

AI summary This document discusses the application of a 2012 cost allocation forecast to estimated participation rates for 2012, noting that these rates may not accurately reflect actual spending by customer rate class.

21 5 Source: 2012 DSM Revised Appendix B Preliminary Program Cost Allocation 1 Request IR-22: 2 3 Reference: Appendix C, Footnote 1 to Attachment 1-4, Table 2(b) (2013), Attachment 1-9, 4 Table 2(b) (2014) and Attachment 1-14, Table 2(b) (...

AI summary The document discusses a request for updated forecasts and cost allocation tables related to the 2012 DSM Revised Appendix B. ENSC confirmed they received an updated forecast for 2012 from NSPI and made adjustments to the Preliminary Cost Allocation Tables based on this information. They also made additional adjustments using 2011 actual allocated costs and estimated the allocation of Enabling Strategies by customer sectors.

21 5 Source: 2012 DSM Revised Appendix B Preliminary Program Cost Allocation Request IR-22: Reference: Appendix C, Footnote 1 to Attachment 1-4, Table 2(b) (2013), Attachment 1-9, Table 2(b) (2014) and Attachment 1-14, Table 2(b) (2015), s...

AI summary The document discusses a request for updated forecasts from MEUNSC and NSPI for 2012 and 2013-2015, as well as the use of 2011 actual allocated costs and Enabling Strategies allocation estimates in updating preliminary cost allocation tables.

Date Filed: March 30, 2012 ENSC CA IR-21 Page 1 of 1 1 Request IR-22: 2 3 Please provide as detailed and realistic as possible an example of the allocation of costs 4 between taxpayer and ratepayer components, based on the proposed budget...

AI summary The document requests detailed examples of cost allocation between taxpayer and ratepayer components based on the 2013 budget or anticipated program activity. It provides three examples, including direct program costs, administrative overhead, and general program administration.

Date Filed: March 30, 2012 ENSC CA IR-21 Page 1 of 1 1 Request IR-22: 2 3 Please provide as detailed and realistic as possible an example of the allocation of costs 4 between taxpayer and ratepayer components, based on the proposed budget...

AI summary The response to Request IR-22 provides examples of cost allocation between taxpayer and ratepayer components. It outlines how direct program costs, administrative overhead, and general program administration are allocated based on the proposed 2013 budget and anticipated program activity.

3 4 ENSC's financial statement audit is a cost that is not "caused" by the number of staff or 5 space, but by the overall business activity. In accordance with the Cost Allocation 6 Methodology, this cost is allocated to ratepayer and taxp...

AI summary ENSC's financial statement audit cost is allocated between ratepayer and taxpayer programs based on their direct program costs. In 2011, ratepayer costs were $31.7 million and taxpayer costs were $5.3 million, leading to an allocation of $19,700 to ratepayers and $3,300 to taxpayers for the $23,000 audit cost.

8. INTERFUND TRANSFERS The Corporation's management transferred $435,591 (2010 - $51,844) from the EDSM Fund and $112,593 (2010 - nil) from the Provincial Fund to the Capital Asset Fund for the purchase of furniture and fixtrures and lease...

AI summary The Corporation transferred funds from the EDSM Fund and Provincial Fund to the Capital Asset Fund for purchasing furniture, fixtures, and leasehold improvements. The transfer amounts were determined based on the Full-Time Equivalents of staff resources assigned to the programs, as per the CAM.

17. COST ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY The Corporation engages in electricity demand-side management ("EDSM Fund") and other energy efficiency and conservation programs ("Provincial Fund"). The costs in each fund include direct costs of the progr...

AI summary The Corporation manages EDSM and Provincial Fund programs, allocating costs based on FTEs and direct costs, with oversight by the UARB. This methodology includes joint and common costs, administrative overhead, and salary expenses.

1 Table 2: 2 Effect of Deferrals and Working Capital on Allocation of Generation Costs Total Demand Energy % Energy Total Generation Costa $917,571 $155,095 $762,476 83.1% FCR Deferral, DSM Amortizationb $15,591 $4,742 $10,850 69.6% c Retu...

AI summary Table 2 presents the effect of deferrals and working capital on the allocation of generation costs, including total generation costs, FCR deferral and DSM amortization, return on deferrals and working capital, and generation costs net of deferrals and working capital.