Topic:"Cost Deferral" in M13007

("MPs") (similar to the ISOs in Australia and Ontario). Fourth and last, a direct fee to NSP who passes through a proportion of the fee to the other relevant MPs (similar to the EfficiencyOne model). In the immediate future, we propose to...

AI summary The document proposes introducing a Direct Charge as a fee recovery mechanism for the IESO NS, where the IESO charges relevant MPs a fixed monthly fee proportional to their annual electricity consumption. This approach aims to reduce setup and administrative costs, provide flexibility for future changes, ensure revenue stability, and align with economic principles.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 19 note there are illustrative true-up and load allocation adjustment calculations in 20 Appendix 3.

AI summary The text notes the presence of illustrative true-up and load allocation adjustment calculations in Appendix 3 of the document.

Terms of Settlement IESO Fee Recovery Settlement Terms Tr -U ue p s G I 7. Re d in t he tru d de fe l, t he F T I g ar g e- up a n rra Ju 1 6 ta t io la i f ie t ha t t he tru ne p re se n n c r s e- up fo I E S O d in Ye 1 is in te d r o...

AI summary The document outlines the terms of settlement related to the IESO fee recovery mechanism. It discusses the allocation of costs and revenues, including the proposal for annual fee recovery and the consideration of various factors such as cost deferral and revenue requirements.

Cons - NSP does not currently allocate any costs using the 12CP - Inconsistent with method NSP has allocated system operator costs

AI summary NSP is not currently allocating any costs using the 12CP method, which is inconsistent with how they have previously allocated system operator costs.