Topic:"Cost Effectiveness" in M03097

Assumptions: -14,010 -1,193 -14,010.2 (Discount Rate is 6.62%) - 5%DSM & Rnew Plan - TUC 6 Duct Fired - In-service Dec/2010 - Capital Cost $93M ($2010) TUC6 DF_$93M (DEC)_APR21.SAV NPV = $12,486.640 M -1,193 -273 29.5

AI summary The text includes financial and project-related data such as capital costs, discount rates, and NPV calculations for a project with a capital cost of $93M, in-service date of December 2010, and a discount rate of 6.62%. It also references a 5% DSM & Rnew Plan and TUC 6 Duct Fired.

Incremental NPV Benefit of TUC 6 Duct Fired - Operating Cost Benefits from Hatch Analysis (Base Case Plan A with NPPH Biomass Project) ase riali A Willi Nrrii Biolilass rioject ass riojecty Capital Cost = $93M Capital Cost = $78M Operating...

AI summary The document presents an analysis of the incremental net present value (NPV) benefits of the TUC 6 Duct Fired project, comparing operating cost benefits from Hatch Analysis under different scenarios, including the Base Case Plan A with the NPPH Biomass Project. The analysis spans from 2008 to 2032, showing varying capital and operating costs over time.

Cumulative NPV Benefit 2008-2032 30.46 M$ Capital Costs are the annual charges for the combination of alternatives added. Files: No TUC 6 Case NPPH-HIGH_No TUC6_JUL13.SAV Planning NPV = $12,047,370

AI summary The text presents a cumulative NPV benefit of 30.46 M$ from 2008 to 2032 and mentions capital costs as annual charges for added alternatives. It also references a file related to a case without TUC 6 and includes a planning NPV value of $12,047,370.

2 Without Duct Firing $M With Duct Firing $M Total Project NPV Benefit $M Increased Capital Cost (4.28) (0.91) (5.19) Additional Operating Costs (5.47) (1.90) (7.37) Tax Savings 3.61 0.70 4.31 Change in Net Present Value (6.14) (2.11) (8.2...

AI summary The table presents a financial analysis comparing the net present value (NPV) benefits of a project with and without duct firing, showing increased capital and operating costs, tax savings, and a negative change in NPV.