Topic:"Cost Effectiveness" in M12177

Overview This strategy involves the examination of potential benefit-cost, optimization, and valuation frameworks, which can support DER investment and planning processes. These frameworks often define rules, methods, and inputs used by di...

AI summary The text discusses the need for clear and consistent benefit-cost analysis (BCA) frameworks to evaluate distributed energy resources (DERs) and ensure alignment between NS Power, E1, and IESO-NS. Stakeholders raised concerns about cost allocation, recovery, and the comprehensiveness of the PAC test in capturing DER value.

Qualitative Assessment Criteria Assessment Rationale Jurisdiction Examples The State of New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC) established a Benefit-Cost Analysis Framework (BCA Order), which requires New York Joint Utilities to use th...

AI summary The document discusses the use of Benefit-Cost Analysis (BCA) frameworks by regulatory bodies such as the New York Public Service Commission (NYPSC) and the Michigan Public Services Commission (MPSC) to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of energy projects and programs. It highlights the development of standardized tools like the Societal Cost Test (SCT) and Jurisdiction-Specific Test (JST) for assessing Distributed Energy Resources (DER) initiatives.