HomeCost EffectivenessM12394Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Cost Effectiveness" in M12394

Matter: NSP Maritime Link Inc. -  2026 Assessment Application - NSPML
10 passages 8 documents

Cost Effectiveness across all matters →

N-1Application 1 passage
3 C. Central Bank Policies p. pp. 52-53
prospects – particularly in industries relying on international trade. 29 The threat of tariffs pulled trade forward, which boosted both exports and imports. CONCENTRIC ENERGY ADVISORS, INC. PAGE 19 19 Bank of Canada, Press Release issued...

AI summary The document discusses the impact of US trade policies on the Canadian economy, considering two scenarios: one with reduced uncertainty and limited tariffs, and another with a prolonged trade war. Both scenarios affect inflation and GDP growth, with the latter leading to a significant recession and higher inflation.

N-6NSPML (Dr. Cleary) RIR 1 to 13 - Redacted 3 passages
Government Reeling From US Tariff Broadside p. p. 11
Government Reeling From US Tariff Broadside On April 2, President Donald Trump announced 24% levies on Japanese products going into the US, although these were later rolled back on April 9 with a 90-day extension. Nevertheless, autos, a se...

AI summary The text discusses the impact of U.S. tariffs on Japanese exports, particularly in the automotive sector, and the resulting economic effects on Japan. It highlights concerns over GDP growth, manufacturing, and inflation, as well as the Bank of Japan's response to these challenges.

UNITED KINGDOM APRIL 2025 p. p. 15
UNITED KINGDOM APRIL 2025 Average % Change on Previous Cale Year Heteronomics 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.5 0.6 0.2 na na na na 4.2 4.3 3.6 3.2 1.1 1.2 3.8 2.5 Econ Intelligence Unit 0.8 1.4 1.3 1.5 1.8 na na na na na na 2.9 2.3 na na na na KPMG 0.8 0.8...

AI summary The table presents average percentage changes from previous calculations across various economic research entities, including Heteronomics, Econ Intelligence Unit, KPMG, and others, for different time periods and categories. The data reflects economic analysis and forecasting from multiple institutions.

Fear of US Tariffs Deepens Downturn p. p. 21
Fear of US Tariffs Deepens Downturn Over the past month, the US has implemented 25% tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminium and cars. On April 2, no further tariffs were imposed on Canada, as it was exempt under the USMCA trade agreement, but...

AI summary The US has imposed 25% tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminium, and cars, deepening economic concerns. Canada's response includes reciprocal tariffs on US cars. The threat of tariffs has led to a drop in investment forecasts and retail trade, with a notable spike in exports before tariffs took effect. Inflation has increased due to the end of a GST/HST tax break, and uncertainty remains as the US economic relationship deteriorates.

N-12Cleary (IG) RIR 1 to 8 1 passage
Response: p. p. 8
Response: - Dr. Cleary cannot comment on any differences or methodologies used by the Conference Board of Canada - (CB) in determining its estimates for real GDP growth and inflation estimates for Nova Scotia. However, - he notes that CB i...

AI summary Dr. Cleary states he cannot comment on differences in methodologies used by the Conference Board of Canada (CB) for estimating real GDP growth and inflation in Nova Scotia. However, he acknowledges CB as a respected source of economic analysis, likely using similar data and approaches as the Bank of Canada and other reputable institutions.

N-17Alberta Utilities Commission Decision 27084-D02-2023 1 passage
5.1 The need for a formulaic approach to setting ROE p. p. 15
the need for protracted, resource-intensive, and costly litigated proceedings. 60 By doing so, it not only saves significant time and resources for both customers and utilities, but also aligns with the Commission's broader goal of improvi...

AI summary The document emphasizes the importance of a formulaic approach to setting the rate of return on equity (ROE) to reduce the need for costly and time-consuming litigated proceedings. It highlights the benefits of this approach in terms of efficiency and regulatory burden reduction, while also acknowledging the need for a mechanism to review and correct outcomes if they are deemed unreasonable.

100428Interim Board Order 1 passage
The Board orders that:
The Board orders that: - 1. The 2026 cost assessment of $198.7 million shall commence on January 1, 2026, subject to the following conditions: - (a) The $4 million monthly holdback will continue in 2026. The cost assessment will be recover...

AI summary The Board has ordered the commencement of a 2026 cost assessment of $198.7 million on January 1, 2026, with a $4 million monthly holdback continuing in 2026. The cost assessment will be recovered through monthly charges until the Board's final decision, and will remain in effect until further Order. The Board reserves jurisdiction on all other issues in the application.

101936Board Decision 1 passage
12.0 CONCLUSION p. pp. 75-76
12.0 CONCLUSION [232] Taking into account all of the evidence and submissions, the Board is satisfied that NSPML's application for its 2026 revenue requirement and cost assessment is reasonable and appropriate, subject to the Board's findi...

AI summary The Board approves NSPML's 2026 revenue requirement and cost assessment, reducing the return on equity from 9.0% to 8.75%. The application to adjust equity thickness and the debt-to-equity ratio is denied. A compliance filing is required, and the $4 million monthly holdback continues into 2026. An interim order was issued on December 23, 2025, approving a $198.7 million cost assessment pending the final decision.

100428Interim Board Order 1 passage
The Board orders that:
The Board orders that: - 1. The 2026 cost assessment of $198.7 million shall commence on January 1, 2026, subject to the following conditions: - (a) The $4 million monthly holdback will continue in 2026. The cost assessment will be recover...

AI summary The Board orders the commencement of a 2026 cost assessment of $198.7 million, effective January 1, 2026, with a $4 million monthly holdback continuing until the final decision. The cost assessment will remain in effect until a further Board order adjusts the difference between interim and final assessments.

101936Board Decision 1 passage
12.0 CONCLUSION p. pp. 75-76
12.0 CONCLUSION [232] Taking into account all of the evidence and submissions, the Board is satisfied that NSPML's application for its 2026 revenue requirement and cost assessment is reasonable and appropriate, subject to the Board's findi...

AI summary The Board approves NSPML's 2026 revenue requirement and cost assessment, but reduces the return on equity from 9.0% to 8.75%. The application to adjust equity thickness and revise the debt-to-equity ratio is denied. A compliance filing is required, and the $4 million monthly holdback continues until further order. An interim order approving a $198.7 million cost assessment was issued on December 23, 2025.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →