Topic:"Cost Effectiveness" in M12743

available evidence, that the project allows NS Power to adhere to industry best practices using identity as a control point and that using MSS is a reasonable way to supplement the utility's capacity. The Board can only disallow costs if t...

AI summary The Board found that NS Power's cybersecurity measures and project management were reasonable, including the use of MSS and the one-month pause following a cybersecurity incident. The Board agreed with the CA that the project had met 80% of its deliverables but will not alter the 15% contingency on the project budget. NS Power is directed to report back by November 15, 2026, on project progress and budget use.

available evidence, that the project allows NS Power to adhere to industry best practices using identity as a control point and that using MSS is a reasonable way to supplement the utility's capacity. The Board can only disallow costs if t...

AI summary The Board found that NS Power's cybersecurity measures, including the use of MSS, are reasonable and in line with industry best practices. The Board also determined that the previous PAM investment was prudent and that the one-month pause following a cybersecurity incident does not justify a reduction in AFUDC. The Board agreed with the CA's assessment of project progress and will not alter the 15% contingency on the project budget, but requires NS Power to report back on project completion by November 15, 2026.