Topic:"Cost Recovery" in M03091

33942-H555 30-Apr-10 . I - Account Original Revision I Current Revision Variance 001 - Hydro Req. Labour 3,000 8,574 5,574 001 - Reqular Labour (No AO) - 85 85 011 - Travel Expense 75 200 125. 012 - Materials 375,000 013 - Power Prod Contr...

AI summary The document presents a comparison between original and current revisions of various account items, highlighting significant variances in costs such as labour, materials, consulting, and administrative overheads, with total costs increasing substantially from 629,936 to 2,075,549.

27-Apr-10 33942 Alternative After Tax WACC PV of EVA / NPV Rank IRR Disc Pay Α Pipe replacement Vs. Do nothing 6.55% 605,634 1 9.68% 19.4 years В Band and Pipe Replacement Vs. Do nothing 6.55% -24,258 3 6.41% 0.0 years c Band/Pipe Replacem...

AI summary The document presents a comparison of alternative pipe replacement strategies with the option of doing nothing, using metrics such as After Tax WACC, PV of EVA/NPV Rank, IRR, and Discounted Payback. The alternatives include full pipe replacement, band and pipe replacement, and a band/pipe replacement program, with varying financial outcomes.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-5: 2 3 Calculation of the Net Present Value CNPV") of the most economical option for the CI # 4 28863 project was based on the assumption that the remainder of the pipeline would be 5 replaced in 2017. This re...

AI summary The document discusses the calculation of the Net Present Value (NPV) for replacing the Coon Pond Pipeline, noting that the original analysis assumed replacement in 2017, but it is now planned for 2010. The updated analysis excludes sunk costs and indicates a revised NPV of $481,421 for the most cost-effective replacement strategy.