HomeCost RecoveryM12536Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Cost Recovery" in M12536

Matter: NSPI General Complaint - Overhead Wires - Tye Laframboise
3 passages 2 documents

Cost Recovery across all matters →

L-3NSPI (NSEB) RIR-1 to RIR-6 (redacted) 1 passage
1 Request IR-2: p. p. 3
1 Request IR-2: 2 3 Please provide a cost table with itemised work details for the underground service upgrade, 4 which includes: 5 6 (a) A clear itemisation of all costs involved in upgrading the underground service to 200 7 amps. 8 9 (b)...

AI summary The request asks for a detailed cost table for an underground service upgrade to 200 amps, including cost breakdowns and responsibilities. NS Power explains that they cannot provide detailed estimates due to undefined work scope and that utility-side upgrades up to the URD box are their responsibility, while homeowner-owned infrastructure is the customer's responsibility.

100052Complainant's Formal Response to NSPI - Redacted 2 passages
B. Matter M09420 – 2020 NSUARB 44 (Port Hawkesbury Paper Demand Response Tariff) p. p. 0
B. Matter M09420 – 2020 NSUARB 44 (Port Hawkesbury Paper Demand Response Tariff) In this decision, the Board reviewed NS Power's proposed Demand Response Tariff for Port Hawkesbury Paper. The Board approved the tariff with conditions that...

AI summary The Board reviewed and approved NS Power's proposed Demand Response Tariff for Port Hawkesbury Paper with conditions to ensure added value and reduced variable costs for customers. The decision emphasizes that tariff and cost allocation structures should not unfairly burden individual customers.

7. In Summary: Request for Guidance or Re-evaluation p. p. 0
7. In Summary: Request for Guidance or Re-evaluation To support a constructive path forward, I kindly request: - 1. A consideration of whether the cost allocation for upgrading underground wiring is equitable and fair - 2. A review of whet...

AI summary Tye Laframboise requests guidance on the cost allocation for upgrading underground wiring, the feasibility of overhead services in Bareng Court, the possibility of a site-specific engineering evaluation, and practical options for upgrading to 200A service. He emphasizes collaboration with NS Power and the Board to ensure safety and feasibility.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →