HomeCost RecoveryM12593Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Cost Recovery" in M12593

Matter: Nova Scotia Power Inc. - CI C0053696 – ECC Wind Integration - $4,428,335
4 passages 4 documents

Cost Recovery across all matters →

N-2NSPI (NSEB) RIR 1 to 22 - Redacted 1 passage
CI C0053696 ECC Wind Integration Project (NSEB M10984) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests p. p. 33
CI C0053696 ECC Wind Integration Project (NSEB M10984) NSPI Responses to NSEB Information Requests 1 costs charged to the project by the appropriate overhead application rate. The charge 2 is debited to a Capital Work Order while the credi...

AI summary The document outlines NSPI's responses to NSEB information requests regarding the ECC Wind Integration Project, detailing how costs are allocated and explaining that the project focuses on operational and back-office tool development rather than efficiency improvements with quantifiable returns.

100501NSEB (NSPI) IR-1 to IR-22 - PDF 1 passage
Request IR-22:
Request IR-22: - a) Please provide a cost benefit analysis for the proposed new system and explain the operational cost savings. - b) Please quantify the expected benefits associated with this project (i.e., decreased congestion, improved...

AI summary Request IR-22 asks for a cost-benefit analysis of a proposed new system, quantification of expected benefits such as decreased congestion and improved reliability, and a time frame for realizing these cost savings.

100502NSEB (NSPI) IR-1 to IR-22 - WORD 1 passage
Section 9
8. System Asset Modelling Assessment 5. Administrative Overhead, is this an internal administrative role? b) Please explain why consulting services are required and describe the selection process. 1. Please provide a cost benefit analysis...

AI summary The text requests explanations regarding administrative roles, consulting services, and a cost-benefit analysis for a new system. It also asks for quantification of expected benefits such as decreased congestion and improved reliability, along with a time frame for cost savings.

101069Board Decision Letter 1 passage
Section 5 p. p. 1
that this project is not driven by efficiency considerations, but by the fact that the proposed technology upgrade was the only feasible option to support the expected growth in renewable generation. In response to IR-8 and IR-13, NS Power...

AI summary NS Power explains that the proposed technology upgrade is necessary to support renewable generation growth, not for efficiency. The upgrade will automate curtailment processes, improve fairness and transparency, and assist back-office functions. The Board approves the project's costs and directs NS Power to file project updates.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →