Topic:"Cost Recovery" in M12733

Order NS Power to: - Provide all written Payment Agreements since 2017 (or confirm none exist). - Credit account for ~$300/month overcharges since 2018. - Recalculate billing from 2017 with full ledger/history. - Waive "arrears" created by...

AI summary The regulatory body orders NS Power to address billing discrepancies by providing payment agreements, crediting accounts for overcharges since 2018, recalculating billing from 2017, waiving arrears, and compensating customers if overcharging is proven.

Recovery of larger sum not precluded Recouvrement d'une somme plus élevée non interdit (6) Les paragraphes (1), (2), (3) et (5) ne privent pas une personne qui peut recouvrer un montant d'une autre personne en vertu de ces mêmes paragraphe...

AI summary The provision clarifies that paragraphs (1), (2), (3), and (5) do not prevent a person from recovering a larger sum from another if they have a right to do so, as per the Revised Statutes of Canada.

Fees recoverable Droits recouvrables (2) All prescribed fees and charges determined by virtue of any regulation that are payable pursuant to this Act shall be recoverable as a debt due to the Crown. 1980-81-82-83, c. 87, s. 27. - 28 (1) Th...

AI summary The text outlines that prescribed fees and charges under the Act are recoverable as Crown debts. It also grants the Governor in Council authority to regulate meter specifications, testing procedures, and associated fees, emphasizing compliance with measurement standards and regulatory oversight.

Demand for Immediate Relief Given the above, I respectfully demand: - An Immediate Stay of Enforcement of all disputed amounts stemming from invalid or non consented "agreements," over-billed usage, or third party arrangements. - Full Reve...

AI summary The applicant demands an immediate stay of enforcement for disputed charges, reversal of specific overbilled amounts (fraudulent arrears, disconnected hot tub, unauthorized VAC arrangement), repayment of excess charges, and confirmation that NS Power cannot enforce disputed amounts during the appeal, citing Regulation 6.5 3 and consumer protection duties.

Request IR-3: - Provide the methodology used to determine: - a) The $803/month payment arrangement and the $561/month usage estimate. - b) The $592/month payment arrangement and the $496/month usage estimate. - c) For each determination, s...

AI summary Request IR-3 seeks clarification on methodology for determining payment arrangements and usage estimates, including time periods, inclusion of estimated reads, weighting of recent consumption, and a recalculation using actual data from the last 12 months.

Clear Violations in Nova Scotia Power's Current Response - Ex Parte Service Violation: Filing formal responses with a public regulator while intentionally cutting the primary consumer out of the email transmission chain. - Breach of Regula...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power (NSP) is accused of multiple violations, including ex parte service breaches, regulatory non-compliance, and unfair billing practices. The complainant, a disabled veteran, alleges NSP used unverified estimates to charge excessive bills, failed to provide legal agreements, and retaliated by enforcing rate hikes. They demand immediate legal action, including a forensic audit and restitution, citing systemic regulatory failure.

ause they cannot produce the signatures, the alleged contracts are null and void ab initio, and the utility is legally required to pay back each and every cent taken under these unexecuted structures. I am done participating in a broken pr...

AI summary Dave Lincoln, a disabled veteran, argues that unexecuted contracts with NSP are invalid, demanding restitution and an emergency stay. He criticizes the Board for enabling NSP's actions and failing to protect consumers, emphasizing the need for regulatory oversight and compliance with legal standards.