HomeCost RecoveryM12779Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Cost Recovery" in M12779

Matter: NSP Maritime Link (NSPML) - Audited Financial Statements - December 31, 2025 and 2025 Cost Containment Report
16 passages 6 documents

Cost Recovery across all matters →

N-12025 Financial Statement 5 passages
Regulatory Matters p. p. 2
Regulatory Matters Regulatory accounting applies where rates are established by, or subject to approval by, an independent third-party regulator. The rates are designed to recover prudently incurred costs of providing the regulated product...

AI summary Regulatory accounting ensures rates recover prudently incurred costs, with regulatory assets deferred if recovery is probable. Management asserts existing assets are recoverable based on regulatory precedent, and notes refer to additional details.

Cash and Restricted Cash p. p. 2
Cash and Restricted Cash Pursuant to the amended Federal Loan Guarantee ("FLG"), restricted cash is held in accounts administered by the collateral agent for the purpose of funding construction and operating costs and servicing debt paymen...

AI summary Restricted cash under the amended Federal Loan Guarantee (FLG) is managed by a collateral agent for the Maritime Link Project, funding construction, operating costs, and debt servicing. NSPML draws funds periodically per the Maritime Link Credit Agreement for near-term use.

Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities p. p. 2
Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10, Government Grants (Topic 832) – Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities. The ASU adds guidance to ASC 832...

AI summary The FASB issued ASU 2025-10 in December 2025, updating ASC 832 to govern accounting for government grants. Effective December 15, 2028, the standard allows modified prospective, modified retrospective, or full retrospective adoption. The Company is assessing its impact on financial statements.

Regulatory Matters p. p. 2
Regulatory Matters On November 29, 2024, NSPML received NSEB approval to collect up to $197.2 million (2024 - $163.5 million) from NSPI for the recovery of costs associated with the Maritime Link in 2025, subject to a monthly holdback of $...

AI summary NSPML received NSEB approvals to collect funds from NSPI for Maritime Link costs, with a FLG agreement involving Canada and Nova Scotia. NSPML issued debt, transferred proceeds, and applied to terminate a holdback mechanism. Applications and regulatory actions span 2024-2026.

Regulatory Risk p. p. 2
Regulatory Risk The Company faces risk with respect to the recovery of costs in a timely manner. As a regulated cost-ofservice utility, NSPML must obtain regulatory approval to set an assessment against NSPI to recover the costs of the Mar...

AI summary NSPML faces regulatory risk in recovering costs for the Maritime Link, requiring NSEB approval. The NSEB sets assessments based on evidence from hearings. NSPML mitigates risk through transparency, stakeholder consultation, and collaborative approaches like negotiated settlements.

N-22025 Regulated Financial Statements 1 passage
NSP Maritime Link Inc. Regulated Operating, Maintenance and General Year Ended December 31
NSP Maritime Link Inc. Regulated Operating, Maintenance and General Year Ended December 31 millions of Canadian dollars Actual 2025 Approved 2025 Assessment Maintenance and inspections (note 1) $ 5.2 $ 6.8 Labour and administration 9.1 8.6...

AI summary The document provides a summary of NSP Maritime Link Inc.'s regulated operating, maintenance, and general expenses for the year ended December 31, 2025, highlighting variances between actual and approved figures, including unspent maintenance costs returned to customers and deferred activities.

N-42025 Cost Containment Report 4 passages
NSP Maritime Link Inc. 2025 Cost Containment Report p. p. 2
NSP Maritime Link Inc. 2025 Cost Containment Report March 31, 2026

AI summary The document is the 2025 Cost Containment Report for NSP Maritime Link Inc., dated March 31, 2026. It outlines the company's cost containment measures and compliance with regulatory requirements. Specific details about cost management strategies or financial data are not provided in the excerpt.

Preamble p. p. 2
As outlined within this report, NSP Maritime Link Inc. (NSPML) continues to review and implement cost containment opportunities in all aspects of its business to ensure value and benefits are maximized for customers and Good Utility Practi...

AI summary NSP Maritime Link Inc. (NSPML) is implementing cost containment measures across its operations to maximize customer value and ensure Good Utility Practice. It proposes reporting these measures within its Assessment applications to the Nova Scotia Energy Board rather than in a separate report, aiming to streamline the regulatory process. In 2025, cost containment strategies resulted in O&M savings of approximately $844,000.

NSPML 2025 Cost Containment Report p. pp. 6-9
NSPML 2025 Cost Containment Report 1 company policies and standards, operating budgets and financial metrics, and legal 2 requirements. 3 4 To ensure the efficient execution of field work and representation of our business, NSPML 5 designa...

AI summary NSPML outlines cost containment strategies, including designating site representatives to monitor projects, optimizing work plans, and leveraging procurement practices. The report emphasizes minimizing cost and schedule impacts while ensuring safety, with detailed savings examples in sections 5.1–5.3.

5.1 Transmission Inspections p. pp. 6-8
5.1 Transmission Inspections As outlined in NSPML's 2025 Cost Containment Report, NSPML used drones for inspection of the transmission lines for the first time in 2024, replacing physical inspections of transmission lines by individuals. T...

AI summary NSPML used drones for transmission inspections in 2024, replacing physical inspections and achieving efficiency and risk reduction. 2025 saw no drone use due to 100% inspection coverage in 2024, though $500,000 was spent addressing findings. Year-over-year costs fell by $800,000, but maintenance costs may fluctuate based on inspection and maintenance needs.

N-5NSPML (NSEB) RIR 1 to 19 - Redacted 2 passages
- and supply strategies. p. p. 125
- and supply strategies. 1 Request IR-17: 27 be understated. They are a visible representative of the Company, supporting the 28 expectations for work to be conducted safely and prudently. Their presence comes at 29 a cost, yet aids in cos...

AI summary The text discusses the role of On-Site Representatives (OSRs) in mitigating risks and avoiding costs for NSPML through their involvement in contractor activities, including confirming work milestones, verifying labor and materials, and optimizing work execution based on on-site conditions.

- 19 a) Please see table below: p. p. 125
- 19 a) Please see table below: NSPML 2025 OMG Breakdown Total 2025 % of Total OMG Comments Operating Costs: Cost of maintaining the asset in accordance with good utility practice, costs associated with NSEB regulatory filings, and Federal...

AI summary The table outlines the breakdown of NSPML's 2025 operating and maintenance costs, including categories like contracts, legal fees, insurance, and benefits. It provides percentages of total costs and comments on the nature of each expense, such as compliance with regulatory filings and unrecoverable costs.

101833NSEB (NSPML) IR 1 to IR 19 3 passages
Request IR-16:
Request IR-16: - Page 7 of 11 of the 2025 Cost Containment Report: NSPML states: "In completing its Contracting - Strategies, NSPML accounts for lessons learned from similar work scopes completed in prior - years, aiming to reduce the cost...

AI summary Request IR-16 asks NSPML to describe formal 'lessons learned' incorporated into its 2025 Contracting Strategies, aiming to reduce costs from uncertainties and risk premiums by refining scope definitions and expectations.

Request IR-17:
Request IR-17: - Page 8 of 11 of the 2025 Cost Containment Report: NSPML states: "To ensure the efficient execution of field work and representation of our business, NSPML designates a site representative to monitor progress, identify emer...

AI summary NSPML's approach to project management through site representatives to address challenges and ensure safety, with questions about implemented solutions and cost savings in 2025.

Request IR-18:
Request IR-18: - Page 8 of 11 of the 2025 Cost Containment Report: NSPML states: "While NSPML's procurement practices complement and support ongoing cost containment focus, NSPML is additionally focused on optimizing the work plan and real...

AI summary NSPML asserts its 2025 work plan adjustments, aligned with budgeting cycles, enabled cost reductions through efficiency optimizations. The request seeks specifics on implemented adjustments and quantified savings.

102768Board letter re: Accepted as filed 1 passage
M12779 – NSP Maritime Link Inc. (NSPML) - 2025 Financial Statements and Cost Containment Report p. pp. 0-1
M12779 – NSP Maritime Link Inc. (NSPML) - 2025 Financial Statements and Cost Containment Report Nova Scotia Power Maritime Link filed its 2025 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements on March 31, 2026. NSPML also filed its 2025 Regulated...

AI summary NSP Maritime Link Inc. (NSPML) submitted its 2025 financial statements and cost containment report. The Board reviewed the filings and accepted confidentiality requests for certain responses to information requests. The Board confirmed the offsetting of future income tax regulatory assets and deferred income taxes, noted NSPML's regulated return on equity, and acknowledged a minor variance in equity thickness. The Board also accepted NSPML's proposal to integrate cost containment reporting into future assessment applications.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →