Topic:"Cost To Customer" in M04819

Developing Integrated Resource Planning Policies in the European Community , Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, Energy and Environment Issue, Vol. 1, Issue 2. 1992. Testimony of Tim Woolf Energy Inflation 1.0%...

AI summary The testimony outlines energy inflation, EE program costs, and impacts, including cost in rates, annual and lifetime energy savings, demand savings, and participant savings. It includes calculations and references to various attachments and evidence.

A NSPI says that the avoided energy cost is $74.96/MWh. (The avoided capacity cost is8 zero.) But, the units that are backed off because of DSM all have running costs much9 less than $74.96/MWh (shown in bold).10

AI summary NSPI claims the avoided energy cost is $74.96/MWh, but units backed off due to DSM have running costs much lower than this figure, as indicated in bold.

Financial - 6. (Reduce energy/electricity costs) - 7. (Rebate/incentive) - 8. (Cost too much to have it picked up) - 9. (Did not want to pay disposal fee at dump/recycling center) - 10. (Reduce maintenance costs/appliance needed repairs)

AI summary The text outlines several reasons related to financial considerations, including reducing energy and electricity costs, receiving rebates or incentives, concerns about high costs, and avoiding disposal fees at recycling centers, as well as reducing maintenance and repair costs for appliances.