Topic:"Cost To Customer" in M12588

Active Submissions Total A - Technical Evaluation A-1 - Adherence to RFP requirements A-2 - Ongoing support availability and service levels A-3 - Speed and efficiency of implementation (or project) plan, availability, and delivery the indu...

AI summary The text outlines the structure of an evaluation matrix for submissions, focusing on technical evaluation criteria such as adherence to RFP requirements, ongoing support, implementation speed, and industry expertise. It also includes sections related to corporate risk, including cybersecurity, insurance, and third-party attestation.

Labour Overhead Calculation Charge Type 2023 Cost ($) 2024 Cost ($) 2025 Cost ($) 2026 Cost ($) Total ($) Regular Labour 22,393 37,306 44,092 179,859 283,650 Overtime Labour 988 2,197 2,115 (56) 5,244 Term Labour 80,333 49,040 4,446 (291)...

AI summary The document presents a detailed breakdown of labour overhead costs for various charge types over the years 2023 to 2026, including regular labour, overtime labour, and term labour, along with the associated annual overhead percentages. This data is crucial for understanding cost trends and planning for future expenses.

Date Filed: March 3, 2026 NSPI (REI) IR-13 Page 3 of 3 1 Request IR-14: D.27 Business Process & Procedure Development Team has finalized process and procedure documentation from a Role Based perspective. Business Leads have all signed off...

AI summary The document outlines several tasks related to the final stages of a project, including the completion of business process documentation, technical development, and testing. These tasks are currently at various stages of completion, with some already finalized and others not yet started.

Commercial Information Items 1-2: Partial confidentiality was applied to costs associated with materials, contracts, consulting, first nations commitments, and freight details provided in the capital work order(s). To protect value for cus...

AI summary NS Power seeks to keep certain costs and supplier terms confidential to protect customer interests and maintain competitive bidding. Full disclosure could lead to higher prices and reduced competition, which would ultimately harm customers. The request for confidentiality is justified by the need to preserve competitive advantage and ensure cost-based rates for customers.

Cost Transparency The SBA submitted Information Requests in order to identify the $581,816 variance from the estimate in the 2025 ACE plan by cost driver. However, in response, NS Power stated that it cannot provide that information due to...

AI summary The SBA requested information on a $581,816 variance in the 2025 ACE plan but was denied by NS Power due to a 2025 cyber incident and lack of detailed cost breakdowns. NS Power cited delayed commercial operations and cost mitigation efforts, but the SBA argues for better cost transparency and standardized reporting.

Cost Transparency The SBA notes that, in response to IRs seeking additional detail on project cost changes, NS Power advised that a detailed variance analysis by cost driver could not be provided due to the impacts of the 2025 cyber incide...

AI summary The SBA highlights concerns regarding NS Power's inability to provide a detailed variance analysis due to the 2025 cyber incident and the lack of detailed original ACE Plan estimates. The SBA suggests greater transparency in indirect costs and standardized reporting for schedule changes. NS Power explains that cost increases were primarily due to delayed COD and implemented mitigation measures, but acknowledges the lack of detailed original estimates. NS Power argues that existing processes already provide sufficient reporting on cost and schedule impacts.