Topic:"Cost To Customer" in M12663

10 Figure 26 – Summary of IESO Nova Scotia's response to Intervenors Topic Intervenor concern IESO Nova Scotia's explanation/supporting evidence provided101 would increase the regulatory asset balance and accrue additional financing costs...

AI summary The intervenor is concerned that the proposed action would increase the regulatory asset balance and lead to higher financing costs at NS Power's WACC, which would raise customer bills. It is also argued that using the FAM does not meet legislative requirements as not all ratepayers contribute to it.

REDACTED 1 Undertaking U-9: 2 3 4 5 To file in confidence what percent of the CEO compensation cost built into the 2026/2027 revenue requirement is base and what is at risk as well as confirmation of what the quantum or maximum amount of t...

AI summary The document outlines several undertakings and responses related to CEO compensation and a transfer capability study. It includes details on the percentage of CEO compensation at risk, maximum bonus amounts, and compensation data for comparable regions and nationally. It also references a study on interregional transfer capability and provides a reference to a specific table in an attachment.

IESO NOVA SCOTIA PANEL 269 Cr-ex, (Rudderham) 1 We've also talked that the mechanics, the procedures 2 associated with the deferral account are still being 3 documented. And I think it is the actual calculation 4 of interest associated wit...

AI summary The discussion revolves around the deferral account mechanics, including how interest is calculated and when it starts accruing. The IESO acknowledges that the policy and procedures are still being developed and that definitive answers are not yet available. There is also mention of financial implications for customers based on spending decisions.