HomeCost To CustomerM12696Evidence
Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Cost To Customer" in M12696

Matter: NSP Maritime Link Inc. (NSPML) - Application to Review the Holdback Mechanism
10 passages 5 documents

Cost To Customer across all matters →

N-4NSPML (IG) RIRs 1-26 - Redacted 4 passages
NSPML Responses to Industrial Group Information Requests p. p. 20
NSPML Responses to Industrial Group Information Requests 1 Request IR-02: 24 opinion, doing so provides a more accurate representation of operating costs applicable to 25 those years to compare to benefits in those same years. 26 27 c) 28...

AI summary NSPML provided responses to Industrial Group Information Requests, including sourcing data from NS Power's Q4 2023 and Q4 2024 Maritime Link Benefits Reports to represent operating costs and benefits accurately.

3.1.1 Method 1: Emergency Work Data p. p. 118
3.1.1 Method 1: Emergency Work Data Locke's Electrical Original Estimate = $1,286,374.75 Length of Line Considered in Original Estimate = 5.93 km Estimated Emergency Factor = 1.5 Labor Cost/km = $144,691.99 The emergency work excluded mate...

AI summary The text provides detailed cost estimates for emergency work on an electrical line, including labor, material, and mobilization/demobilization costs, with inflation factors applied to adjust for current pricing.

Table 2: Midspan Structure Material Costs p. p. 118
Table 2: Midspan Structure Material Costs Material Cost Description Unit Unit Price Units Per Tower Price per Tower A1+6 Tower EA $ 8,776 1 $ 8,776 A1 Foundation EA $ 4,000 1 $ 4,000 A1 Guy Anchors EA $ 1,760 4 $ 7,040 A1 Guy Assembly EA $...

AI summary The document presents tables detailing material and installation costs for midspan structures in Southern Labrador. The material costs total $28,298 per tower, and installation costs amount to $272,066 per tower after applying an estimated inflation factor of 2, resulting in a total cost of $328,662 per tower.

Preamble p. p. 189
As submarine power cable dimensions and weight have grown considerably during the last two decades, manufacturers are less keen to provide extra heavy armoring for the beach zone. In many cases, the armoring is designed only to meet the re...

AI summary The text discusses the challenges and considerations in designing submarine power cable armoring, noting that manufacturers often prioritize cost over robustness. It highlights examples of enhanced protection, such as the Channel Island cable, and emphasizes the need to balance upfront costs with potential future repair expenses and risks from external threats.

N-8Evidence - CA 1 passage
EXPERT TESTIMONY p. p. 10
alf of the Nova Scotia Consumer Advocate. Forecasts of power imports. Impact of scheduling uncertainty for new generation. Seasonal and time-varying rates. Stakeholder engagement on updating methods. Nova Scotia UARB Matter No. M12012, dir...

AI summary The text outlines regulatory proceedings across Nova Scotia and other jurisdictions, including capital expenditure plans, renewable energy applications, just transition incentives, and rate plan extensions. Key issues involve reliability investments, cost minimization, renewable resource evaluation, and stakeholder engagement on rate design and procurement practices.

N-9BW (IG) RIR 1 to 5 2 passages
Request IR-5:
Request IR-5: - Reference: N-7, Evidence of Bates White, pp. 34-35, regarding long-term outlook of - deliveries and the potential for extended outages (e.g. 6-week bipole outage scenarios). - a. Is Bates White able to quantify the expected...

AI summary Request IR-5 seeks Bates White's analysis on quantifying the frequency of extended outages (e.g., 6-week bipole scenarios) and their financial impact on ratepayers post-termination of the holdback mechanism. The inquiry focuses on reliability risks and cost implications for consumers.

Response IR-5:
Response IR-5: (a-b) Bates White has not conducted any analysis estimating the likelihood of extended bipole outages on the LIL, or the financial impact on ratepayers if such events occur after the holdback mechanism is terminated. It is r...

AI summary Bates White has not analyzed the likelihood or financial impact of extended bipole outages on the LIL after the holdback mechanism ends. They note that such outages, particularly in winter, could impose material costs on Nova Scotia ratepayers due to the unavailability of low-cost Nova Scotia Block volumes.

101315Bates White (NSPML) IR 1 to 22 - PDF 2 passages
- i. Please provide a list and detailed explanations of all "routine maintenance" done during this outage. p. p. 8
- i. Please provide a list and detailed explanations of all "routine maintenance" done during this outage. 1 ii. Were there any additional maintenance activities that occurred during the outage, 21 please provide the results of that dilige...

AI summary The document requests detailed information on routine maintenance during an outage, additional maintenance activities, and the associated costs to Nova Scotia ratepayers. It also asks for explanations of cable switching deficiencies and corrective actions taken during the April 2024 outage.

Preamble p. p. 8
- iii. If the LIL had been able to operate at 900 MW as designed, would the timing and/or duration of this outage been different? Please explain. - iv. Please provide all materials NSPML received from NLH regarding this outage, work done d...

AI summary The text includes a series of questions regarding an outage related to the LIL (likely a power line or facility) and its potential impact on operation, costs, and diligence conducted by NSPML. The questions focus on whether the outage could have been avoided, the materials received, independent assessments, and cost implications for ratepayers.

101316Bates White (NSPML) IR 1 to 22 - Word 1 passage
Section 9
event? Please provide supporting evidence. 5. Did design flaws in the LIL contribute to this outage? Please provide supporting evidence. 6. Please provide all materials NSPML received from NLH regarding this outage, work done during the ou...

AI summary The text contains a series of questions directed at NSPML regarding an outage on the LIL, including inquiries about design flaws, maintenance activities, and cost implications for ratepayers. It also asks about the impact of the outage on the LIL's operational capacity and the timing of NSPML's request to cease the Holdback Mechanism.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →