N-3Transcript of Technical Conference held October 15, 2026
4 passages
. - So the FAM balance as of September - 30th, 2026 would be consistent with the approved - INTERNATIONAL REPORTING INC. CERTIFIED COURT REPORTERS methodology in the plan of administration for cost - allocation throughout for each customer...
AI summary The discussion centers on the allocation of costs, specifically the FAM balance, and the timing of market entry for financing. It clarifies that the 60-day requirement is a legal requirement, not an expectation, and highlights the need to act quickly due to bond market volatility.
in the LP. - So the LP's got back income no offsetting deduction, if - that makes sense. - MS. McNAMARA: So would the tax - expense in the LP be offset by a deduction in Nova Scotia - Power? - MR. FERGUSON: That's right. Like not - perfect...
AI summary The discussion revolves around the tax implications of transferring assets to a limited partnership (LP) and how this affects Nova Scotia Power's credit metrics. The transfer removes the equity component of financing, reducing taxable income and allowing Nova Scotia Power to reduce debt and equity in line with its capital structure.
riods lower than 30 - years checked or calculated or is that something that - could be done? - MR. FLEMMING: There was certainly not - one included in the application. I'm not sure if we would - be able to issue that tenor of bond for -– t...
AI summary The discussion revolves around bond tenors, discount rates used in net present value calculations, and the impact of shorter-term considerations on revenue requirements. Nova Scotia Power's approved weighted average cost of capital is noted as 6.59 percent, and thermal assets are highlighted as the largest contributor to net present value benefits.
ost benefit from an - NPV and revenue requirements perspective and, as you can - see there, every one of these components, including them, - provides a reduced revenue requirement to customers on a - net present value basis with the inclus...
AI summary The discussion outlines a structure where Nova Scotia Power forms a limited partnership to securitize regulatory assets, issuing bonds and loaning proceeds to Nova Scotia Power. This approach is designed to defer taxes and avoid adverse consequences for customers. Revenue requirements and NPV are considered, with the FAM cost reducing revenue requirements by over $20 million.
104048IG (NSPI) IR 1 to 34
4 passages
- 8 (b) Please provide a version of Appendix D with this alternative securitization 9 scenario. - 10 (c) Please explain and quantify any financial or capital-market implications of 11 issuing approximately $750 million rather than $1 billi...
AI summary The text requests detailed financial and market analysis regarding the issuance of securitized bonds, including implications of varying issuance sizes, investor demand, credit ratings, interest rates, and cost comparisons between different scenarios.
2 Reference: Matter M12661, ELID Application - 3 (a) Please confirm whether any of the matters in dispute in the ELID 4 application affect, or are expected to affect, the amount of the PHP Deferral 5 balance, the $12.2 million forecast bal...
AI summary The document contains questions related to the ELID application, specifically concerning the impact of disputed matters on deferred balances, the calculation of securitization balances, the basis for recovery of deferred costs, and a request for NPV analysis of different recovery timelines.
7 Request IR-30: - 8 Reference: N-1, Application, page 14, lines 21-25 (PHP Deferral); page 15, lines 17-21 - 9 (IESO-NS Deferral); page 20, lines 15-21 (Upfront Financing Costs); page 26, lines 3-6 - 10 (Financing Costs allocation); page...
AI summary The document discusses the allocation methodologies for various deferrals and financing costs, including PHP Deferral, IESO-NS Deferral, and Upfront Financing Costs, and their application to the FAM prepayment. It requests confirmation that the described allocation methods are accurate.
1 FUTURE RECONCILIATION PROPOSAL - 2 Request IR-32: - 3 Reference: N-1, Application, Section 9.0, page 33. Preamble: NSPI proposes a Formula-based True-up Mechanism and notes it will annually calculate the required Securitized Surcharge re...
AI summary NSPI proposes a Formula-based True-up Mechanism to annually calculate the required Securitized Surcharge revenue based on forecast financing costs, reserve account activity, and earnings. The mechanism includes provisions for reviewing adjustments and addressing scenarios where fuel costs are lower than forecast, as well as handling potential reductions in IESO Deferral balance costs.