Topic:"Demand Side Management Advisory Group" in M07544

EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16) 1 2 EfficiencyOne shared a preliminary draft report with the DSMAG on April 11, 3 2016. This draft report provided CLEAResult's detailed research methodology, 4 but did not pr...

AI summary EfficiencyOne shared a preliminary and final draft report with the DSMAG in 2016, receiving feedback that led to improvements in the methodology for setting incentives. Stakeholders requested more detailed reports to provide meaningful comments.

High Level Specifications

AI summary The document outlines a regulatory proceeding in Nova Scotia, listing acronyms and entities involved in energy efficiency, demand-side management, and utility regulation. Key organizations include Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB) and Efficiency Nova Scotia (EN), with references to programs like DSM and EEPS.

EFFICIENCYONE INCENTIVE SETTING METHODOLOGY FILING (E-ENS-R-16) 1 2 EfficiencyOne shared a preliminary draft report with the DSMAG on April 11, 3 2016. This draft report provided CLEAResult's detailed research methodology, 4 but did not pr...

AI summary EfficiencyOne shared a preliminary draft report with the DSMAG in April 2016, which included CLEAResult's research methodology but no recommendations. Limited feedback was received, and stakeholders requested a more detailed report. A complete draft was shared in late April, leading to technical feedback and improvements. A final report was shared in June 2016, with comments requested by June 15.

Implementation Timeframe The Implementation Plan filed on June 30, 2016, established timelines for the implementation of CleaResult's recommendations. As a result of the need for further consultation with Synapse and DSMAG, EfficiencyOne r...

AI summary EfficiencyOne requests Board approval to revise the implementation timeframe for CleaResult's recommendations, citing the need for further consultation with Synapse and DSMAG.

fficiencyOne received feedback from three DSMAG members as part of the final draft report review. 3 Most of the feedback was of a technical nature and resulted in improvements to the Report. A final report was shared with DSMAG members on...

AI summary EfficiencyOne received feedback from DSMAG members and other stakeholders during the development of the Report and Implementation Plan, leading to multiple revisions. The final report was filed in 2016, followed by stakeholder comment periods and revisions in 2017.

fficiencyOne received feedback from three DSMAG members as part of the final draft report review. 3 Most of the feedback was of a technical nature and resulted in improvements to the Report. A final report was shared with DSMAG members on...

AI summary EfficiencyOne received feedback from DSMAG members and other stakeholders on the final draft of the Report and Implementation Plan. The report was revised multiple times based on stakeholder comments, with a final revision filed in May 2017 after a stakeholder comment period.

Table 4: Cost Effectiveness Tests and Relationship to Incentive Setting from a Return on Investment Perspective Cost Effectiveness Test General Description and Features Implication for Incentive Setting The TRC is an evaluation of the tota...

AI summary This table outlines the Total Resource Cost (TRC) method for evaluating cost-effectiveness in programs, considering both utility and participant benefits and costs. It explains that TRC does not directly include incentives but accounts for them as a subset of participant costs, provided the incentive is less than the participant cost. Program administration costs are also considered separately.