Topic:"Demand Side Management Advisory Group" in M08604

rticipant Market Questions S1. Using a scale from 1 to 10 where 1 is “not at all satisfied” and 10 is “completely satisfied” how would you rate your satisfaction with the program overall? _ S2. [IF S1<8] What was the most important reason...

AI summary The document contains survey questions related to participant satisfaction with the Custom Incentives Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS). It explores satisfaction levels, reasons for dissatisfaction or satisfaction, challenges faced during implementation, and suggestions for improvement.

PROGRESS REPORT 1 pursue the nature and quantification of estimates associated with participant non- 2 energy benefits to improve the TRC test in future Applications.” 41 3 4 Further to this Settlement Agreement, ENS hosted a DSM Advisory...

AI summary This section discusses efforts to quantify non-energy benefits within the TRC test in Nova Scotia. ENS hosted a DSM Advisory Group symposium in 2016 and commissioned a study by VEIC to adapt non-energy benefit values for ENS’s energy-efficiency portfolio. The draft report was reviewed by the DSMAG, and further discussions are planned for 2018.

of the 2017 evaluation results for Recommendation 2017 No action required. energy savings and for demand-reduction for all programs. General-SVR-1 The Savings Verification study recommends increase in the level of effort in process Recomme...

AI summary The 2017 evaluation results for Recommendation 2017 indicate no action is required. However, the Savings Verification study recommends increasing the level of effort in the evaluation process for the next evaluation. ENS agrees with this recommendation and is developing a 2018 Evaluation Plan in collaboration with the Evaluation Consultant.

7.8 50.6 593.9 7.9 0.154 0.013 61,979 20,800 33.0 Business, Nonprofit, and Institutional Programs Custom Incentives 5.1 25.8 366.9 4.5 0.198 0.014 35,603 111 16.9 Custom 4.2 24.2 362.1 4.2 0.174 0.012 not avail. not avail. 15.8 Energy Mana...

AI summary The text presents numerical data related to various energy programs, including Custom Incentives, Energy Management Information Systems, and Direct Installation, with metrics such as participation numbers, costs, and program impacts.

avings from the proposed demand reduction 10 pilots during 2019? 11 A. No, and E1 does not include any savings for the demand reduction pilots in its 12 performance targets. 17 13 Q. Do you have any recommendations? 14 A. Given the peak lo...

AI summary The text discusses E1's exclusion of demand reduction pilot savings from performance targets and recommends developing plans for peak load growth. It also notes E1's 2019 DSM Plan estimates 850,000 tonnes of CO2e savings but lacks clarity on emission factor methodology.

ows: “E1 should increase focus on capacity savings by implementing demand reduction pilots as soon as feasible, subject to review by stakeholders and the Board.” 5 In addition to demand response, the CA also commented on the need for revis...

AI summary The text discusses E1's need to prioritize capacity savings through demand reduction pilots, the CA's recommendations for revising the RBIA and DSMAG, NS Power's supply agreement with E1 under the EPIA, and a submission by Brian Curry requesting approval of the agreement. It references Exhibit E-13 and matter M08604.

September 27, 2018 Doreen Friis Regulatory Affairs Officer/Clerk Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board 1601 Lower Water Street, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 1692, Unit “M” Halifax, NS B3J 3S3 Re: EfficiencyOne for Approval of a Supply Agreement for E...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) seeks to delay submitting revised rate and bill impact analysis (RBIA) recommendations to EfficiencyOne and the DSM Advisory Group until October 10, 2018, following a July 2018 UARB order requiring submission by September 30, 2018. The delay is agreed upon with EfficiencyOne.