Topic:"Demand Side Management Advisory Group" in M08929

representative of commonly deployed and emerging DR programs in the industry and are listed in Figure ES-2. Figure ES-2. Summary of Demand Response Options Considered in Study

AI summary The text references a figure summarizing demand response (DR) options considered in a study, highlighting commonly deployed and emerging DR programs in the industry.

nd represented as a delivery cost in terms of $/kW-yr. Figure ES-14. DR Annual Program Costs by Option for Cost-Effective DR Options ($) Source: Navigant Analysis ©2019 Navigant Consulting, Ltd. Page 14 Nova Scotia Energy Efficiency and De...

AI summary The document discusses scenario analysis for demand response (DR) programs in Nova Scotia, comparing low, base, and high participation scenarios. It highlights how different participation levels, incentive amounts, and marketing spending affect DR achievable potential and program costs. The high scenario assumes a default opt-out model for CPP, which impacts the cost-effectiveness of other DR programs.

BNI Curtailment- Water Heating Control Water Heating BNI Curtailment- Industrial Total Facility BTM Battery Control BTM Battery Control Batteries EV Charging Control EV Charging Control EV CPP with enabling technology Critical Peak Pricing...

AI summary The text discusses various demand-side management (DSM) options for curtailing energy use, including Direct Load Control (DLC) for residential and small BNI customers, BNI Curtailment for large BNI customers, and BTM battery control for all customer classes. It also mentions EV charging control and Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) with and without enabling technology.

The range of costs estimated for Scenario Bs in the Initial Portfolio Study Results (page 51) of the NS Power 2020 IRP modeling Results Release – June 26, 2020 are based on the Behind the Meter solar cost assumptions (High and Low Capacity...

AI summary The text discusses cost estimates for Scenario Bs in the NS Power 2020 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) modeling results, based on Behind the Meter solar cost assumptions. It also outlines how the Resolve model evaluates economics over 5-year increments and mentions ongoing consultations about T&D Avoided Cost methodology through the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG).

(DSMAG). NS Power will advise the IRP stakeholders on the outcomes of the methodology discussions. E1-1 Modeling Provide further updates on scenario modelling with NS Power provided a detailed results release on June 26, results draft resu...

AI summary NS Power will provide updates on scenario modeling results to IRP stakeholders, with detailed results released in June 2020 and additional results provided in September 2020 ahead of stakeholder workshops.

Nova Scotia Power IRP Final Report Appendix I Page 42 of 44 NS Power Interim Modeling Results Stakeholder Feedback (May 2020) No. Topic Comment NS Power Response E1-2 Modeling Subsequent to submitting these written comments, E1 Provide sta...

AI summary Nova Scotia Power responded to stakeholder feedback on its IRP modelling results, agreeing to provide a tutorial on the Plexos LT model and engaging with the DSMAG on the T&D Avoided Cost methodology development process.

M costs based on methods developed in the DSM advisory group. RII also concurs with EfficiencyOne that the DSMAG is a logical venue for completing the determination of avoided costs for DSM planning. John D. Wilson and Paul Chernick • Reso...

AI summary The text discusses the need for an aggressive near-term resource procurement strategy, including a potential 700 MW wind procurement by 2025, conditioned on price and performance thresholds. It criticizes the current approach for being too limited and not fully leveraging potential cost savings opportunities.

enefits of DSM in report Potential risk reduction benefits of DSM are beyond the Item 13 scope of the IRP. Efficiency One NS Power agrees that the DSMAG is an appropriate place The DSMAG is a logical venue for completing the to review the...

AI summary The text discusses the role of the Demand Side Management Advisory Group (DSMAG) in reviewing the development of avoided costs of generation as part of the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP). It notes that the DSMAG is a logical venue for this process and that a discussion is scheduled for early 2021 to determine methodology and timing.

9. EVERGREEN PROCESS As part of its IRP Action Plan, NS Power is proposing an "Evergreen IRP Process". E1 understands the concept of an evergreen process – one rooted in the continuous updating of IRP assumptions and outputs – and is gener...

AI summary NS Power proposes an 'Evergreen IRP Process' for continuous IRP updates due to risks and uncertainties, including carbon pricing and smart grid technologies. E1 supports the concept but emphasizes defining parameters like update frequency and stakeholder roles. The process aims to address volatility in utility sectors and decarbonization trends.

Demand Response 5. The inclusion of cost-effective demand response in E1's mandate necessitates that E1 has a role in the development of any Demand Response strategy. Further, E1 considersthe DSMAG to be the appropriate forum for future di...

AI summary The text emphasizes that E1's mandate requires involvement in developing a cost-effective demand response strategy. It also states that E1 views the DSMAG as the appropriate forum for future discussions on establishing such a strategy in Nova Scotia.

DSM advisory group. RII also concurs with EfficiencyOne that the DSMAG is a logical venue for completing the determination of avoided costs for DSM planning and that the DSM Rate and Bill Im

AI summary The text discusses the role of the DSM advisory group in determining avoided costs for DSM planning, with RII agreeing with EfficiencyOne that the DSMAG is a logical venue for this determination.