Topic:"Demand Side Management Purchase Agreement" in M12768

Extra Large Industrial Active Demand Control (ELIADC) Tariff 2025 Annual Report (NSEB M12768) NSPI Responses to IG Information Requests 1 Report, pending discussion with Bates White with respect to the appropriate level of detail 24 prior...

AI summary NSPI is responding to information requests regarding the 2025 ELIADC Tariff Annual Report. They mention updating tables comparing ELIADC outcomes but are still investigating how to provide more detailed quantifications of load shifting benefits and costs, citing data restoration timing for platforms like PI and PortOps.

1 Request IR-1: 22 in three bullets. Were these reasons referenced in previous years by PHP, in relation 23 to its reason for having deviated from the submitted schedule? If it has, what does 24 NS Power understand to be the specific impac...

AI summary The text outlines a request for information regarding PHP's deviations from its submitted schedule, the impact of global trade challenges in 2025, and the financial implications of Code 5 PDN deviations on ADC benefits and credit payments. It also asks whether a similar outcome is expected in 2026. NS Power responds that the ELIADC Tariff does not require PHP to adhere to its forecast load or limit forecast revisions.

Power's report included a summary of its efforts to comply with prior Fuel Adjustment Mechanism (FAM) Audit recommendations, Bates White stated that it will address that issue in its FAM Audit report. Like Bates White, the Small Business A...

AI summary The document discusses NS Power's compliance with FAM audit recommendations, the limited benefits of the ELIADC tariff, and concerns raised by the Small Business Advocate and Industrial Group regarding data restoration and tariff adequacy. It also references Matter M12661.