E-22017 DSM Evaluation Reports
60 passages
.g. lighting projects). This methodology was applied to Custom and Small Business Energy Solutions, the Mail-in Rebates service of Business Energy Rebates and some measure categories under Green Heat. 2.6 Billing Analysis For Green Heat, a...
AI summary The text discusses energy efficiency programs and their evaluation methods, including billing and metering analyses for initiatives like Green Heat and Efficient Product Installation. These analyses aim to assess energy savings and ensure accurate data collection for program effectiveness.
Appliance Retirement 0.740 0.740 0.60 0.443 0.368 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Instant Savings 2.993 2.993 0.85 2.558 5.186 Home Energy Assessment 2.535 2.348 0.76 1.981 2.029 Existing Residential Green Heat 4.271 5.114 0.60 3.073...
AI summary The text presents a table with various energy efficiency programs and their associated metrics, including appliance retirement, residential and business rebates, and custom incentives. It includes numerical data such as costs, quantities, and percentages, but no explicit discussion or arguments are made.
ation of the adjustment ratios for these measures as an example. Below are the steps to calculate the margin of error for the adjustment ratio used on energy savings generated by lighting measures. Project No. 6138 13 Evaluation of 2017 DS...
AI summary The document outlines the calculation of the weighted average and weighted standard deviation of adjustment ratios for lighting measures in the 2017 DSM programs. The weighted average adjustment ratio is determined to be 0.927, with a weighted standard deviation of 0.360.
nted alongside the results in the applicable sections. Examples of calculations used to establish margins of error can be found in Appendix II of the 2017 DSM Programs Evaluation Executive Summary. Instant Savings 63 Residential Efficient...
AI summary The document discusses evaluations of the 2017 DSM Programs, including interviews with retailers and a participant survey conducted in Halifax to assess the Instant Savings program and its impact on ENERGY STAR certified LED lamps.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report For Instant Savings, the peak demand savings were calculated using the on-peak demand-to-energy ratios developed by Navigant in the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. These ratios were established for var...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the methodology used to calculate peak demand savings for the Instant Savings program, referencing the on-peak demand-to-energy ratios developed by Navigant for the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. The Evaluator validates this approach, with some exceptions based on measured data and specific product categories.
ER), DEER2014 EUL Table, http://www.deeresources.com/index.php/23-deer-versions/27-deer-2014. 110 David Rogers, PowerSmart Engineering, Smart Strip Electric Savings Usability, October 2008, p. 22. Instant Savings 107 Residential Efficient...
AI summary The text references a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, discussing revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category, including data from the DEER2014 EUL Table and a study by David Rogers from PowerSmart Engineering.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 72: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report includes Table 72, which presents revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category, likely used to assess the effectiveness of demand-side management programs.
oss Energy Savings – at the 10.640 2.042 3.229 0.505 1.454 0.441 0.150 0.013 0.001 0.192 0.032 Meter (GWh) Line Loss Factor 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 1.100 Gross Energy Savings – at the 11.704 2.246 3.552...
AI summary The document presents data on energy savings metrics, including gross energy savings, effective useful life, and peak demand savings, measured at both the meter and generator levels. It also references the 'Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program' by Efficiency Nova Scotia and the '2017 DSM Evaluation Report'.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 73: Revised Gross Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category (Continued) Efficient Efficient Clothes Smart Heavy Program- Refrigerator Washer Room Bath- Total for Clothes- Deh...
AI summary The text presents a table from the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, showing revised gross energy and peak demand savings by product category, including Smart Heavy Power Bar, Thermostat, Clothes Line, Efficient Refrigerator, Washer, Room Dehumidifier, Air Purifier, Bath Fan, and other products.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 74: Evaluated Net Energy and Peak Demand Savings by Product Category LED Non A-type Motion LED LED Energy Power LED A- Lamp LED Indoor Sensor Outdoor Energy Star Fixture Dimmer Bar Product Category type Rec...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report includes Table 74, which evaluates net energy and peak demand savings by product category, including LED lamps, motion sensors, and other energy-efficient technologies.
Energy Savings Revised Gross Energy Savings 0.005 0.300 0.585 0.221 0.033 0.013 0.168 0.113 0.064 0.106 0.006 20.312 – at the Meter (GWh) NTGR 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 - Net Energy Savings – at the 0.005 0.300...
AI summary The text presents tables detailing energy savings and peak demand savings across various categories, including revised gross energy savings, net energy savings, line loss factors, effective useful life, and net lifetime energy savings. These metrics are calculated at both the meter and generator levels, and include factors such as the Net-to-Gross Ratio (NTGR) and line loss factors.
.100 1.100 1.100 - Net Peak Demand Savings – 0.000 0.000 -0.282 0.000 0.005 0.002 0.028 0.019 0.013 0.043 0.002 2.558 at the Generator (MW) Instant Savings 114 Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM E...
AI summary This section compares energy and peak demand savings from the 2017 DSM evaluation with tracked savings, highlighting differences in net savings due to varying NTGRs across product categories. Evaluated energy savings are 19.543 GWh, while tracked savings are 26.162 GWh. Peak demand savings show a similar discrepancy, with evaluated savings at 2.558 MW compared to tracked savings of 5.186 MW.
product category. The NTGRs presented in this table correspond to the rounded averages obtained by dividing net savings by installed gross savings (with interactive effects taken into account). The evaluated net energy savings are 25 perce...
AI summary The evaluated net energy savings are 25% lower than tracked energy savings, primarily due to decreased savings from LED A-type lamps and lower market effects. Net peak demand savings are 51% lower, influenced by similar factors and lower peak demand-to-energy ratios for lighting products.
stionnaire Appendix VI - IS: Participant Survey Results Appendix VII - IS: Unitary Savings Calculations for Measures not Updated in 2017 Appendix VIII - IS: Algorithm for Free-ridership Calculation Appendix IX - IS: Internal Spillover Meth...
AI summary The document provides appendices related to the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation. It includes participant survey results, unitary savings calculations, free-ridership calculation algorithms, and internal spillover methodology.
LGORITHM FOR FREE-RIDERSHIP CALCULATION ..................................... 36 IS: INTERNAL SPILLOVER METHODOLOGY........................................................... 38 Project No. 6138 ii Residential Efficient Product Rebates Pro...
AI summary This section outlines the 2017 recommendations from the Evaluator for the Residential Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia. It notes that there were no incomplete recommendations from the 2016 evaluation.
Sections Recommendations 1 Continue to perform the metering activity to increase sample sizes. This year, the Evaluator developed a new metering protocol, which greatly improved the quality of the metering data. Although the metering appro...
AI summary The Evaluator recommends continuing metering activities in 2018 using the same protocol as in 2017 to increase sample sizes and improve data quality. Additionally, improvements to the tracking process for appliances retired through the ARet pilot are suggested, including using updated unitary savings values and clearly identifying pilot-retired appliances.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 2017 GH-R2. Conduct a survey with a larger sample of participants who installed MSHPs in non-electrically heated households. As part of the 2017 evaluation, a participant survey was conduct...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report recommends conducting a larger survey in 2018 to better understand the impact of Green Heat on participants who installed MSHPs in non-electrically heated households, as the initial sample size was too small to provide meaningful insights.
tions The process evaluation specifically targets the Retrofit service of the Custom program component. Due to the start date of the latest Strategic Energy Management (SEM) cohort, SEM did not have any participants who achieved savings in...
AI summary The document discusses the 2017 evaluation of the Existing Residential program, which includes the Home Energy Assessment (HEA), Green Heat, and Efficient Product Installation (EPI) components. It highlights that a process evaluation was added for Green Heat in 2017 due to program changes and outlines the evaluation methodology and findings.
blic Utility Commission,Technical Reference Manual, June 2016, (Section 2.2.1 –Electric HVAC) 13 Unitary savings values with electrical resistance should be divided by a COP of 2.1 rather than 2.0. Home Energy Assessment 19 Existing Reside...
AI summary The text references a technical adjustment to unitary savings values for electric HVAC systems, suggesting a COP of 2.1 instead of 2.0. It also mentions the Home Energy Assessment and the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia.
with the peak demand of the electricity system. The projected electricity demand peak period in Nova Scotia is between 5 p.m. and 7 p.m. in the months of December to February on a non-holiday weekday. For HEA, peak demand savings were calc...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of peak demand savings using on-peak demand-to-energy ratios established by Navigant in the 2016-2018 DSM Plan. These ratios are based on local data and are used to estimate savings from space heating and DHW measures. The Evaluator validates the approach used by Navigant.
on the use of the different energy sources available in these homes. The on-site visit sampling methodology and the protocol used to collect information are presented in Appendix XIII. Savings Review The Evaluator applied various methodolo...
AI summary The document discusses the methodology used to evaluate energy savings from biomass, solar thermal, and heat pump measures, as well as a price sensitivity analysis conducted with MSHP participants. It also references the number of participants and measures installed under the Green Heat program and mentions the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 8.1.2 Savings Review of Biomass Measures, Solar Measures and Hybrid Heat Pump Water Heaters The Evaluator reviewed the savings methodologies and calculation values for all biomass and solar...
AI summary The document evaluates energy savings from biomass, solar, and hybrid heat pump water heaters installed under Green Heat in 2017. Unitary savings values for wood and pellet stoves are based on HOT2000 models, calibrated to historical electrical consumption, with adjustments made for participants using ASHPs based on COP values from the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission's TRM45.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Revised Savings A literature review focused on identifying updated technical references, metering studies and/or comparable billing analyses was carried out for wood and pellet boilers and...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the maintenance of revised savings for wood and pellet boilers, solar domestic hot water systems, and solar air heaters. It notes the lack of updated studies and the continued use of RETScreen energy models for calculating savings. Peak demand savings for solar systems are zero due to solar equipment not operating during peak periods.
ublic Utility Commission (PUC), Technical Reference Manual, June 2015, Section 2.2 – HVAC. 51 Fully electrically heated households correspond to households that are 100 percent electrically heated. Green Heat 68 Existing Residential Progra...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia analyzed electrical consumption data from 292 participants before and after the installation of Mini-Split Heat Pumps (MSHPs). A regression model based on the Princeton Scorekeeping Method was used to compare energy consumption changes.
mand savings value of 3.04 kW since such parameters were not tracked in 2017. Table 42 presents the unitary savings values obtained for each category, as well as the average unitary savings value. Green Heat 83 Existing Residential Program...
AI summary The document discusses unitary savings values for air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) in non-electrically heated households, as calculated in Table 42 of the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report for Efficiency Nova Scotia.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 42: Unitary Savings Values Calculations for ASHPs in Non-electrically Heated Households Peak Demand Scenario in the Absence Energy Savings Energy Savings Peak Demand Savings Value of Green Heat Equation Val...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report includes a table calculating unitary savings values for air-source heat pumps (ASHPs) in non-electrically heated households, considering different scenarios such as purchasing a heat pump, switching to electrical resistance heating, or maintaining non-electrical systems.
051 0.010 0.000 0.000 0.001 Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.141 0.056 0.011 0.000 0.000 0.001 Green Heat 98 Existing Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM...
AI summary This excerpt from the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia presents data on energy and peak demand savings from various heat pump programs, including MSHP and ASHP. It includes metrics such as Revised Gross Energy Savings, Net Energy Savings, and Line Loss Factor.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report Figure 17: Summary of Participation in RDI89 and RP&C90 and in EPI Number of Participants Number of Products Installed 18,000 800,000 16,000 700,000 44,43147,167 14,000 600,000 6,833 59,168 12,000 500,000 10,000...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report includes a figure summarizing participation in RDI89, RP&C90, and EPI programs, along with the number of products installed. The data shows trends in participation and product installations from 2012 to 2017.
ke random sampling errors into account; they do not reflect non-sampling errors or biases such as data entry errors, inaccurate responses from respondents or the inability to contact certain people. Efficient Product Installation 111 Exist...
AI summary This section discusses the evaluation of the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report. It mentions the calculation of margins of error for survey samples and free-ridership levels, and outlines the participant survey conducted in October 2017 with 100 non-low-income participants.
this type of product through EPI. 101 The installation rate remained at 106% because the outlier’s savings were small in comparison to the total savings of all the other pipe insulation projects. Efficient Product Installation 128 Existing...
AI summary The document discusses the installation rates and peak demand savings for energy efficiency programs, specifically focusing on the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program. It notes that installation rates for pipe insulation remained high due to minimal outlier impact and that LED holiday lights had a 100% installation rate. Peak demand savings were calculated using ratios from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, except for lighting products, which used measured data from a residential study.
E12 LED lamps. 108 Adjusted peak-demand-to-energy ratio = peak-demand-to-energy ratio × (1 + interactive effects factor for peak demand savings) / (1 + interactive effects factor for energy savings) Efficient Product Installation 133 Exist...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of adjusted peak-demand-to-energy ratios, incorporating interactive effects factors for peak demand and energy savings. It also details the methodology used in the 2015 RP&C evaluation for determining energy interactive effects factors for DHW measures, noting differences between apartments and single-family homes.
DSM) results for the 2017 evaluation of the New Residential program. This program is comprised of one component: New Home Construction (NHC); the 2017 evaluation also included the Passive House pilot. Table 1 below lists the number of part...
AI summary The document presents the results of the 2017 evaluation of the New Residential program, which includes New Home Construction (NHC) and the Passive House pilot. It provides data on participation levels, gross savings, net-to-gross ratio (NTGR), and net savings for each component and the total program.
lower than the annual figures from 2012 through 2016. Nonetheless, in 2017, NHC managed to achieve the highest per-participant net energy savings result since 2011, with 7.913 MWh per participant. New Residential Program ix New Residential...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights that New Home Construction (NHC) achieved the highest per-participant net energy savings since 2011, with 7.913 MWh per participant, despite lower annual figures from 2012 through 2016.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 1.3 Participation History Figure 2 below illustrates NHC’s evolution in participation levels as well as in net energy and peak demand savings from 2011 to 2017. The 2017 figures also includ...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report highlights a decrease in participation in the New Home Construction (NHC) program compared to previous years, despite an increase in new registrations. The report notes that lower housing completions in Nova Scotia influenced participation levels. Although overall energy and peak demand savings were lower in 2017, the per-participant energy savings reached an all-time high.
3.212 0.909 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 New Home Construction 6 New Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report 2 NHC EVALUATION METHODOLOGY This section presents the meth...
AI summary This section outlines the methodology used in the 2017 New Home Construction (NHC) evaluation by Efficiency Nova Scotia. It describes the data collection activities, including a review of program documentation, a meeting with the program manager, and the preparation of data collection instruments.
n (Performance Plus) at least once. The main reasons mentioned for not participating in NHC in 2017 were that the rebate was not worth the effort and that the program component was too complicated. New Home Construction 11 New Residential...
AI summary The 2017 NHC impact evaluation aims to assess the gross and net electrical energy savings and peak demand savings from the New Home Construction (NHC) and Passive House pilot programs. The evaluation revises gross savings calculations based on modelled energy savings, overestimation ratios, and peak demand savings.
egression analysis. 4.1.4 Interactive Effects No additional interactive effects are considered in the NHC savings calculation since they were already taken into account in the HOT2000 simulations. For the Passive House pilot, the interacti...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of energy savings, including interactive effects, peak demand savings, and effective useful life (EUL) values. It references the use of simulation models, the on-peak demand-to-energy ratio from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan, and the review of EUL values based on literature and technical reference manuals.
Loss Factor 1.098 1.098 - Total Gross Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.878 0.017 0.895 New Home Construction 22 New Residential Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 10: Revised Gross Energy and Peak...
AI summary The document presents data from the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, focusing on the Passive House Pilot program. It includes metrics such as energy savings, peak demand savings, and effective useful life, providing insights into the program's performance.
Tracked Savings 0.021 MW 0.014 MW 0.93 0.013 MW Evaluation Results 0.021 MW 0.014 MW 0.39 0.006 MW The savings tracked by ENS were compared with the revised results established by the Evaluator for 2017. For NHC, the evaluated gross energy...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report compares tracked savings with evaluated results for the New Home Construction (NHC) and Passive House pilot programs. Differences in savings are attributed to changes in the NTGR value and free-ridership levels, impacting net energy and peak demand savings.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report D2. How many bedrooms are in your home? 2015 2016 2017 Number of Bedrooms in Home (%) (#) (#) Sample Size 22 19 13 1 9% - - 2 9% 1 2 3 50% 11 9 4 23% 6 2 5+ 5% 1 - Don’t know 5%...
AI summary The document presents survey data on the number of bedrooms in homes and whether homes are occupied year-round or seasonally, collected in 2015, 2016, and 2017. The sample sizes and percentages are provided for each category, with some data missing in certain years.
2017 DSM Evaluation - Appendix Report P1. Usually, who makes the decision to participate in the New Home Construction program, is it you or the future home owner? Builders’ Decision to Register – Participant Builders 2015 2016 2017 Sample...
AI summary The text discusses the decision-making process for participation in the New Home Construction program, focusing on who makes the decision and the reasons for participation. Builders are the primary decision-makers, with some collaboration from future homeowners.
d LED Products from 2015 to 2017 .................................. 67 Figure 15: Market Evolution for Commercial LED Lighting ................................................................... 71 Efficient Product Rebates Program x Effic...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2017 demand-side management results for the Efficient Product Rebates program, including the Business Energy Rebates component. It details participation levels and savings from both mail-in and instant rebate services.
ke random sampling errors into account; they do not reflect non-sampling errors or biases such as data entry errors, inaccurate responses from respondents or the inability to contact certain people. Business Energy Rebates 10 Efficient Pro...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses on-site visits conducted to validate energy efficiency measures and assess spillover effects, as well as a review of effective useful life values used in calculating energy savings. The report includes a participant survey and references technical reference manuals.
-source heat pump, an HVAC occupancy sensor, or one LED fixture type. The tracking report usually presents each measure on a separate line with a single project containing one or more unique measures. To present revised savings, the Evalua...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the evaluation of 28 HVAC projects with 45 measures, including the use of EFLH values from the Minnesota TRM and adjustments made due to transcription errors in the 2016 report.
g Tool to prevent future errors. Specifically, the Evaluator suggests using either imperial units with the additional conversion factor of 3.412, or using metric capacity values combined with the COP. Overall, adjustments were limited and...
AI summary The evaluation report discusses energy savings adjustments for commercial lighting measures in 2017, noting updates to annual HOUs, baseline wattage values, and PCF as common causes of adjustments. Thirty-four lighting projects were evaluated, with overall tracked quantities matching on-site findings.
r week, resulting in a positive adjustment to energy savings which almost doubled. The PCF was consequently revised to 1 due to the extended schedule discovered by the Evaluator during the site visit. This was the only compressed air proje...
AI summary In 2017, adjustments were made to a compressed air project and an agricultural project during the DSM evaluation. The compressed air project's energy savings were increased due to a revised PCF, while the agricultural project's savings were reduced due to an incorrect cow count declaration.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report The interactive effects for BER Instant Rebates are based on the building types and associated heating and cooling systems verified during the SBES and BER Mail-in lighting project on-site...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses the interactive effects for BER Instant Rebates, noting that the average peak demand and energy savings factors from 2016 were used in 2017 due to missing information and changes in product eligibility. The report highlights that the proportion of BER Mail-in measures not eligible for Instant Rebates has increased to 61%.
1.543 21.650 5.286 408.624 Peak Demand Savings Tracked Gross Non-peak Demand Savings (MW) 0.029 0.520 0.069 9.689 Adjustment Ratio on Demand Savings 1.000 1.000 1.000 In-service Rate 1.000 1.000 1.000 Peak Coincidence Factor 1.000 0.646 1....
AI summary The text provides data on demand savings and related metrics, including peak demand savings, non-peak demand savings, adjustment ratios, and factors such as the peak coincidence factor and interactive effects factor. It also references the Efficient Product Rebates Program by Efficiency Nova Scotia in the context of a 2017 DSM Evaluation Report.
1.066 1.066 1.066 1.066 Net Peak Demand Savings – at the Generator (MW) 0.494 0.466 0.219 0.453 1.701 1.060 Business Energy Rebates 59 Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Evaluated Net Energy...
AI summary This section presents data on net peak demand savings at the generator level and discusses the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report, focusing on evaluated net energy and peak demand savings for BER Instant Rebates.
Motors and VSDs 703,959 11.8% 9 2 4 6 Total 10,433,682 100.0% 80 51 31 82 In total, the Evaluator reviewed 82 individual projects. The actual sample deviated from the planned sample in four categories due to a limited number of projects. R...
AI summary The Evaluator reviewed 82 projects, with some deviations from the planned sample due to limited project numbers. The on-site visit protocol was slightly modified from the 2016 BER protocol to collect more detailed information on lighting use. The protocol includes general and measure-specific data sections based on the 2017 CIRx Screening Tool.
Efficient Product Rebates Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Commercial Griddles Location Product Type Manufacturer Model Number Width Installed (ft): Quantity: Explanation if quantity is different: Specify if electr...
AI summary The document outlines forms and data collection requirements for the Efficient Product Rebates Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation Report, focusing on commercial griddles, refrigeration/freezers, and ice makers. It includes fields for equipment details, usage, and ENERGY STAR certification validation.
..................................................... 46 Figure 10: Methodological Model ......................................................................................................... 47 Custom Incentives Program viii Custom Inc...
AI summary This report evaluates the 2017 performance of the Custom Incentives Program, a demand-side management initiative by Efficiency Nova Scotia, which includes Custom, Energy Management Information Systems (EMIS), and Strategic Energy Management (SEM). No savings were generated by the SEM component in 2017.
ring estimates of easily measurable variables were used. Of the entire sample, these four projects accounted for 19.4 percent of the tracked energy savings and 16.4 percent of the peak demand savings. M&V documentation has improved in over...
AI summary The text discusses improvements in M&V documentation and the need for a change management process to track project adjustments. It also mentions the use of standardized methods for calculating interactive effects in lighting projects, referencing a 1993 ASHRAE Journal article.
on of electric baseboards. The Evaluator recommends that those calculations be added to the documentation requirements for New Construction projects. Project No. 6138 3 Custom Incentives Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation –...
AI summary The document outlines a research instrument for evaluating the Custom Incentives Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2017 DSM Evaluation. It includes objectives and associated questions to assess program outreach, delivery, barriers to participation, and consultant satisfaction, among other topics.
rticipant Market Questions S1. Using a scale from 1 to 10 where 1 is “not at all satisfied” and 10 is “completely satisfied” how would you rate your satisfaction with the program overall? _ S2. [IF S1<8] What was the most important reason...
AI summary The document contains survey questions related to participant satisfaction with the Custom Incentives Program under Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS). It explores satisfaction levels, reasons for dissatisfaction or satisfaction, challenges faced during implementation, and suggestions for improvement.
to all measures found in the 2017 tracking sheet. 11 Internal tool which references and defines, for each category of measure, the standard equations to be used for the gross savings calculations Small Business Energy Solutions 19 Direct I...
AI summary The document discusses the 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia, which includes a table comparing tracked and revised Effective Useful Life (EUL) values for various measure categories. The revised EUL values are weighted averages based on revised gross savings calculations.
9% 3% 4% Refused 1% - - Project No. 6138 32 Direct Installation Program Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation – Appendix Report ON-SITE VISIT SAMPLING METHODOLOGY AND PROTOCOL Sampling Methodology for Participant Visits In 2017, a tot...
AI summary In 2017, 50 on-site visits were conducted to evaluate the installation portion of the Small Business Energy Solutions (SBES) program. A stratified sampling method was used, dividing projects into Audit and DIY paths based on tracked savings, ensuring a representative sample of project sizes and measure categories.
pant’s decision to implement these additional measures. The value established regarding this level of influence was used to determine the portion of the additional savings attributable to the program. Then, the level of internal spillover...
AI summary The text outlines a methodology to calculate internal spillover by comparing additional savings attributable to a program with total program savings. It also provides an example calculation for revising energy and peak demand savings, focusing on a lighting measure category that accounted for a significant portion of savings in the SBES program in 2017.
Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 25: Total Peak Demand Savings Associated with the Introduction of the Building Code Regulation for the Houses and Small Buildings Sectors in the Nova Scotia Market Number of Non-compl...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report by Efficiency Nova Scotia discusses the impact of building code regulations on peak demand savings in Nova Scotia, focusing on single houses and large buildings. It uses a demand-to-energy ratio to estimate savings and considers peak demand periods from December to February.
2017 DSM Evaluation Report Table 30: Energy Savings Associated with Clothes Washers’ New MEPS in the Nova Scotia Market Percentage of Nova Scotia Annual Energy Total Energy Savings Nova Scotia Market Product Class Market Affected by the Sa...
AI summary The 2017 DSM Evaluation Report discusses energy savings from new minimum energy performance standards (MEPS) for clothes washers in Nova Scotia. Table 30 shows total energy savings of 2.447 GWh annually, with peak demand savings estimated at 0.337 MW based on a demand-to-energy ratio from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan.
E-4EfficienyOne Application
46 passages
1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 3 EfficiencyOne developed the 2019 DSM Resource Plan for the supply of electricity 4 efficiency and conservation activities to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power), in accordance 5 with the Electricity Plan Implementation...
AI summary EfficiencyOne developed the 2019 DSM Resource Plan for NS Power under the Electricity Plan Implementation (2015) Act and the Public Utilities Act. The 2019 Plan is an extension of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, with similar energy and demand targets and the inclusion of demand-focused pilots. The ENS Grant of Franchise was extended to December 2025.
1 • Market conditions (e.g. program and measure saturation); 2 • Operational data; and 3 • Program impact and process evaluations, including evaluated savings results, 4 Delivery Agent input and paiticipant feedback. 5 6 The 20 I 9 DSM Res...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan outlines the programs and investment targets for demand-side management, continuing a trend of evolving programs to achieve cost-effective energy and demand savings. The plan is developed in line with the Public Utilities Act and includes components for residential, business, and non-profit customers, as well as enabling strategies.
treach, Development and Research, and Other Enabling Strategies. 24 25 1.1 2019 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment 26 27 In 2019, EfficiencyOne will invest $34.05 million (in 2019 dollars) to achieve 127.2 28 GWh and 20.2 MW of incre...
AI summary The text outlines EfficiencyOne's 2019 DSM Resource Plan, detailing a $34.05 million investment aimed at achieving 127.2 GWh and 20.2 MW of annual net energy and peak demand savings at the generator level.
20.2 0,268 '" 0.021 3 Currency 1s expressed m 2019 dollars. 4 Columns may not add correctly, due to rounding. 5 n Based on values of program Weighted Average Measure Lives, which have been derived from the 2017 Evaluation process. 6 1, Inc...
AI summary The 2019 program targets are based on the approved 2016-2018 Plan and recent evaluation results. The total budget and savings targets for 2019 are similar to the average annual targets from the previous plan, with a slight increase due to the allocation of $1 million to Enabling Strategies for research and pilots focused on demand reduction. The overall unit cost has increased to diversify the measure mix and reduce reliance on lighting savings.
7 In 2019, ENS will continue to leverage and grow the support of qualified industry 8 professionals to promote and deliver BNI initiatives. These professionals have existing 9 relationships and the required experience and expertise in thei...
AI summary In 2019, ENS plans to continue working with qualified industry professionals to promote energy efficiency initiatives, particularly through the Efficiency Trade Network (ETN). The BNI sector will have access to programs like Efficient Product Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation, which are based on the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan and will evolve with market conditions.
ation with NS Power for potential future DSM programs. The 2019 8 budget includes $1.0 million for exploring demand reduction and developing and 9 implementing pilot activities. 10 11 Although planning is in the early stages, ENS is consid...
AI summary ENS is exploring potential future DSM programs with NS Power, including two demand reduction pilots targeting residential and BNI customers. The 2019 budget allocates $1.0 million for these activities, aiming to demonstrate benefits such as decreased capacity costs and access to time-of-use rates.
ding committee for a particular end-use [e.g., HVAC]) 26 or Technical Subcommittee (struck for the development of a particular standard) levels, as 27 oppotiunities arise. DATE FILED: April 6, 2018 Page 23 of24 EFFICIENCY ONE 2019 DSM PLAN...
AI summary This section outlines the Regulatory Affairs activities of ENS in 2019, including negotiations with NS Power on the DSM Resource Plan, filing regular reports with the UARB, and hosting DSM Advisory Group meetings to engage stakeholders and manage ongoing initiatives.
nclude working with the Evaluation and Verification Consultants to facilitate their 23 effmts and pursuing commitments arising from the 2019 DSM Resource Plan regulatory 24 process. DATE FILED: April 6, 2018 Page 24 of24 EfficiencyOne IN T...
AI summary The document outlines EfficiencyOne's filing related to the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and the establishment of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities with Nova Scotia Power Inc. under the Public Utilities Act.
Page 3 of 23 EFFICIENCYONE 2019 DSM PLAN FILING EVIDENCE 1 over-recovery of funds by ENSC from 2013.7 2 3 EfficiencyOne filed its 2015 DSM Resource Plan with the UARB on May 14, 2014 and the 4 UARB approved a Settlement Agreement on Septem...
AI summary EfficiencyOne submitted multiple DSM Resource Plans to the UARB, with the 2015 plan being a continuation based on historical data and the 2016-2018 plan using full resource modelling. The UARB approved agreements and a compliance filing, with some issues deferred for resolution outside the regulatory process.
of a final agreement between the parties, and approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan (12 Aug 2015), 2015 NSUARB 204 at para 27 and Appendix C (available on CanLII). DATE FILED: April 6, 2018 Page 4 of 23 EFFICIENCYONE...
AI summary The text refers to the approval of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management Resource Plan and cites a 2015 NSUARB decision. It also mentions the filing of the EfficiencyOne 2019 DSM Plan and relates to evidence in a regulatory proceeding.
1 2. TRANSITION YEAR PLANNING 2 3 EfficiencyOne had originally planned to file an Application in 2018 seeking approval for a 4 three-year 2019-2021 DSM Resource Plan, in accordance with section 79J(2)(a) of the 5 Public Utilities Act. Howe...
AI summary EfficiencyOne planned to file a three-year DSM Resource Plan for 2019-2021 but adjusted to a one-year plan in 2019 due to the Electricity Plan Implementation (2015) Act. The plan aligns with NS Power’s Rate Stability Period and continues the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan based on the 2014 Integrated Resource Plan.
2018 approved DSM Plan and program mix, it is also based on the same 2014 23 IRP considerations. 24 25 EfficiencyOne recognizes that the 2019 DSM Resource Plan must meet the requirements 26 of the new legislation, provide sound and reasona...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan must comply with new legislation and provide sound evidence for regulatory approval, ensuring program continuity without relying on an updated IRP. This approach mirrors the one taken in 2015 under the Electricity Plan Implementation Act.
l 6, 2018 Page 7 of 23 EFFICIENCYONE 2019 DSM PLAN FILING EVIDENCE 1 legislative changes also led to the filing of a one-year continuation Plan. 2 3 2.1 Development of 2019 DSM Program Targets and Investment 4 5 In accordance with the cons...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan was developed as a continuation of the UARB-approved 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, informed by ENS's experience, market conditions, operational data, and program evaluations. Historical data from 2014-2017 and forecasts for 2018 were analyzed to set savings targets and assess cost effectiveness.
1 2.4 2019 Planned Investment by Rate Class / 2019 Cost Allocation Approach 2 3 Appendix D provides ENS’s preliminary expected investment by rate class, associated with 4 implementation of the 2019 DSM Resource Plan. This information is pr...
AI summary The document outlines ENS's 2019 DSM Resource Plan investment by rate class and cost allocation approach, as well as reporting requirements including quarterly reports and a 2019 Annual Progress Report. It also outlines the continuation of mid-course adjustment requirements and reporting timelines as per the UARB’s Revised Filing Dates letter.
Quarterly Reports, including: 29 • Quarterly and year-to-date (YTD) highlights (comparison of targets, mid-course 30 adjustments, and results by program); DATE FILED: April 6, 2018 Page 10 of 23 EFFICIENCYONE 2019 DSM PLAN FILING EVIDENCE...
AI summary The document outlines the structure of quarterly and annual reporting requirements for EfficiencyOne's 2019 DSM Plan, including YTD investment, sector highlights, and modifications to annual progress report inclusions based on the single-year DSM Resource Plan.
1 2.5.3 Mid-Course Adjustments and Flexibility 2 3 ENS often makes limited adjustments to an approved DSM Resource Plan to reflect 4 changes in market conditions and updated insights from program and organizational 5 evaluations (unknown a...
AI summary The document outlines procedures for mid-course adjustments to the DSM Resource Plan by EfficiencyOne, including thresholds for substantial changes and the need for advance notice. It also mentions the use of performance targets and indicators developed with Dunsky Energy Consulting for the 2016-2018 plan and their continuation in the 2019 plan.
the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, EfficiencyOne will retain the same definitions used in the 25 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. For clarity, these include: 26 • Performance Metric: A quantifiable measure that is used to track and assess the status...
AI summary The document outlines the definitions of performance metrics and performance indicators used in the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, retaining the same definitions from the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. These definitions are used to track and assess the status of specific achievements and monitor progress toward performance targets.
1 help it deliver on performance targets. 2 • Performance Target: A performance metric expressed as a specific quantified goal 3 that identifies the desired outcome of an activity at a specific point in time. In this 4 Application, Perform...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is proposing to carry forward the same performance targets and indicators from the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan for the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, citing that the metrics are based on readily available data and that spending is constrained by UARB approvals.
ional circumstances in which an application to the UARB must be made; and 23 • Additional indicators such as Total Resource Benefits and Pipeline of Projects 24 (present in the initial recommendations from Dunsky Energy Consulting) are not...
AI summary The document discusses the exclusion of certain indicators like Total Resource Benefits and Pipeline of Projects from the application process due to ongoing discussions about customer non-energy benefits and their role in the TRC Test. It also highlights improvements in ENS’s ability to track lifetime energy savings and report ex-post results annually.
1 savings as a performance indicator for the 2019 DSM Resource Plan. 2 3 In the context of a one-year DSM Resource Plan, incremental and cumulative values for 4 energy and peak demand savings are equivalent. As a result, one key change in...
AI summary The document discusses changes to performance indicators for the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, proposing the removal of cumulative annual energy and peak demand savings targets and the addition of annual incremental energy and peak demand savings targets. Table 2 outlines the proposed performance metrics and targets.
- Customer Satisfaction % ✓ 12 13 As in the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, ENS is proposing a 90 percent Performance 14 Threshold for both Performance Targets. Success is achieved if 90 percent or greater is 15 reached on both Performance Ta...
AI summary The document outlines ENS's proposal for a 90 percent Performance Threshold for both Performance Targets in the 2019 DSM Plan. Success is defined as achieving 90 percent or greater on both targets, with a regulatory process triggered if either target falls below this threshold.
1 3. 2019 DSM RESOURCE PLAN 2 3 3.1 Summary 4 5 The proposed 2019 DSM budget is based on the average annual budget in the UARB- 6 approved 2016-2018 DSM Plan, following the approach established in the Electricity Plan 7 Implementation (201...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan proposes a budget based on the average from the 2016-2018 plan, with similar energy and demand savings targets. It emphasizes increased demand reduction through pilots by EfficiencyOne and NS Power, aimed at addressing firm demand growth in Nova Scotia. These initiatives are foundational for future demand reduction activities.
source modelling process rather than investing 23 to repeat this work when the inputs have not materially changed; 24 - investing a reasonable amount of time to develop the 2019 DSM Resource 25 Plan; and 26 - seeking to avoid a lengthy and...
AI summary The document discusses the rationale for continuing the 2019 DSM Plan without repeating the modelling process, emphasizing the need to avoid unnecessary repetition, invest reasonable time in developing the plan, and avoid a lengthy and expensive regulatory proceeding by continuing an existing UARB-approved DSM Plan.
1 3.2 2019 Energy Savings and Investment 2 3 Table 3 summarizes the savings and investment levels for the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, 4 which can be found in Appendix A. Lifetime benefits, TRC test results, and PAC test results 5 are not provi...
AI summary Table 3 summarizes the savings and investment levels for the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, including details on residential DSM programs such as Efficient Product Rebates, Existing Residential, and New Residential, along with their respective investments, energy savings, and unit costs.
hted Average Measure Lives, which have been derived from the 2017 Evaluation process. 11 b Includes participation by low income households. 12 13 With the exception of the 2015 continuation year, EfficiencyOne’s and ENSC’s past DSM 14 Plan...
AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2019 DSM Resource Plan is a continuation of the 2016-2018 plan, developed using a data-modelled approach. The decision to not conduct new modelling for 2019 was based on the lack of material changes in inputs and the potential increase in costs.
ed reporting 26 functions. 27 28 4.1.4 Control Based External Audit Approach 29 30 In 2013, EfficiencyOne transferred accounts payable and payroll to a control-based audit DATE FILED: April 6, 2018 Page 21 of 23 EFFICIENCYONE 2019 DSM PLAN...
AI summary EfficiencyOne implemented a control-based audit approach in 2013 for accounts payable and payroll, reducing the need for substantive audit procedures. ENS completed an electronic Technical Reference Manual in 2017, which improved operational efficiency in delivering the 2019 DSM Resource Plan.
• Decreased administrative burden to implement changes in measure 18 characterizations associated with the results of the 2018 impact evaluations. DATE FILED: April 6, 2018 Page 22 of 23 EFFICIENCYONE 2019 DSM PLAN FILING EVIDENCE 1 5. CON...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan is a continuation of the approved 2016-2018 plan, focusing on providing electricity efficiency and conservation services through a Supply Agreement with NS Power. It is aligned with the Electricity Plan Implementation (2015) Act and incorporates EfficiencyOne’s experience and potential market changes.
s the UARB approve: 19 • the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, provided as Appendix A; and 20 • the Supply Agreement, provided alongside this Evidence. 18 The 2015 DSM Resource Plan was a one-year continuation of the existing 2013-2014 DSM Resource...
AI summary The document requests the UARB's approval of the 2019 DSM Resource Plan and the Supply Agreement. It references the 2015 DSM Resource Plan as a one-year continuation of the 2013-2014 plan under the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act.
1 1. INTRODUCTION 2 3 EfficiencyOne developed the 2019 DSM Resource Plan for the supply of electricity 4 efficiency and conservation activities to Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NS Power), in accordance 5 with the Electricity Plan Implementation...
AI summary EfficiencyOne developed the 2019 DSM Resource Plan for Nova Scotia Power Inc. in accordance with the Electricity Plan Implementation (2015) Act and the Public Utilities Act. The 2019 Plan continues the investment and targets from the 2016-2018 Plan and includes new demand-focused pilots.
1 • Market conditions (e.g. program and measure saturation); 2 • Operational data; and 3 • Program impact and process evaluations, including evaluated savings results, 4 Delivery Agent input and participant feedback. 5 6 The 2019 DSM Resou...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan outlines program strategies and investment targets for energy and demand savings, continuing the approach used in the 2015 plan. EfficiencyOne will invest $34.05 million to achieve 127.2 GWh and 20.2 MW of savings, while considering market conditions and customer satisfaction.
1 Table 1 - 2019 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment Incremental Incremental Annual Lifetime Net Annual Net Net Demand First Year Lifetime Investment Energy Savings 2019 Energy Savings Savings at the Unit Cost Unit Cost ($ million) at...
AI summary Table 1 presents the 2019 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment, detailing incremental energy savings, investment costs, and unit costs for various residential and business DSM programs in Nova Scotia.
Based on values of program Weighted Average Measure Lives, which have been derived from the 2017 Evaluation process. 5 b Includes participation by low income households. 6 7 Program targets for 2019 are based on a variety of considerations...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Plan includes energy and demand savings targets similar to the average annual targets in the 2016-2018 Plan, with a slight variance due to the allocation of $1.0 million to Enabling Strategies for demand reduction research and pilots. The unit cost has increased to diversify the measure mix and reduce reliance on lighting savings.
1 and/or customer demand in periods within and outside of the NS Power system coincident 2 peak period. 3 4 In addition to the 2019 demand reduction pilots, which will explore options to reduce both 5 facility peak demand (where applicable...
AI summary ENS is planning demand reduction pilots focused on residential and BNI customers to explore demand-focused activities and best practices. These pilots aim to demonstrate benefits such as reduced capacity costs and access to time-of-use rates. Potential measures include incentives for thermal storage and hot-water systems, as well as new demand-focused measures in existing programs.
D: April 6, 2018 Page 23 of 24 EFFICIENCYONE 2019 DSM PLAN FILING Appendix A 1 4.3.3 Regulatory Affairs 2 3 Regulatory Affairs activities include UARB processes, DSM Advisory Group initiatives and 4 stakeholder consultation work, industry...
AI summary This section outlines the Regulatory Affairs activities for 2019, including negotiations with NS Power on the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, stakeholder and UARB approvals, and the filing of various reports and updates with the UARB.
1 1. 2019 DSM RESOURCE PLAN SUMMARY 2 3 The 2019 DSM Resource Plan, presented in Appendix A, identifies DSM programs, 4 services, strategies, investments, and energy and demand targets. The plan is cost- effective 5 and is based upon the a...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan outlines energy savings and investment targets for residential programs, including efficient product rebates and existing residential initiatives, with details on energy savings, investment costs, and unit costs.
34.1 127.2 1638.4 20.2 0.268 0.021 15 Currency is expressed in 2019 dollars. 16 Columns may not add correctly, due to rounding. 17 a Based on values of program Weighted Average Measure Lives, which have been derived from the 2017 Evaluatio...
AI summary The document presents tables comparing actual energy and demand savings from 2008 to 2017 with planned savings for 2018-2019. It references the 2019 DSM Resource Plan and the Electricity Plan Implementation (2015) Act, which extended the DSM plan term to include 2019 and set a maximum investment of $34,050,000.
Page 2 of 17 EFFICIENCYONE 2019 DSM PLAN FILING Appendix B
AI summary This document is Appendix B of the EfficiencyOne 2019 DSM Plan Filing. It provides additional information related to the Demand Side Management (DSM) plan submitted for regulatory consideration.
il 6, 2018 Page 3 of 17 EFFICIENCYONE 2019 DSM PLAN FILING Appendix B
AI summary The document is an appendix to the EfficiencyOne 2019 DSM Plan Filing, submitted on June 6, 2018, and includes page 3 of 17. It pertains to demand-side management programs and related regulatory filings.
t buildings). The unit cost is similar to that 27 of the approved 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan for the two components that were merged 28 to create this offering (Residential Direct Install and Rental Properties and Condos), and 29 similar...
AI summary The document discusses changes to the energy savings targets and unit costs for the Residential Direct Install and Rental Properties and Condos components, which were merged into a new offering. The energy savings target has been reduced compared to the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. For the New Residential program, the energy savings target has increased to 35%, with unit costs higher than the 2016-2018 plan due to increased incentive levels.
1 achieve more significant energy savings (for both existing buildings and for new 2 construction). In addition, only a small portion of Custom savings are lighting-based, and 3 as such are less likely to be affected by the associated tran...
AI summary The text discusses energy savings targets and program performance under the Direct Installation component of the DSM Resource Plan. It notes that while targets have remained consistent with the 2016-2018 plan, actual savings have been lower in recent years. Unit costs have increased due to program restructuring and changes in incentive structures, affecting participation rates and cost efficiency.
1 4. DATA SOURCES 2 3 A variety of data sources were used to develop the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, including the 4 following: 5 • Approved 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. As the 2019 budget and overall 6 targets are based on the approved 2016-2...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan was developed using data from previous plans, recent results, independent evaluations, and market considerations. Historical findings and feedback from participants and evaluators were emphasized in setting targets and budgets.
1 energy savings, targets for programs and program components such as Home 2 Energy Assessment, Green Heat, New Home Construction, and Custom have 3 been increased in relation to the actuals from recent years and/or the approved 4 2016-201...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan increases energy savings targets for various programs and components, informed by past performance and market trends. ENS uses a full-modelling approach with Navigant’s ELRAM to assess cost-effectiveness and program budgets, continuing the methodology from the 2016-2018 DSM Plan.
rce Plan in all 23 material manners. 24 25 EfficiencyOne’s ongoing research associated with implementing the Incentive Setting 26 Methodology Report is likely to continue to affect incentive levels across the portfolio. 27 These changes wo...
AI summary The document discusses the impact of EfficiencyOne's research on the Incentive Setting Methodology Report, which may affect incentive levels in the DSM Plan. It also compares energy savings between the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan and the 2019 DSM Resource Plan.
1 to its incentive structure, with rationale for changes provided in section 2.3, above. For 2 Direct Installation, this is largely due to program restructuring and resulting incentive 3 changes, as well as updates to, inter alia, runtime...
AI summary The document discusses the cost-effectiveness of the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, noting its similarity to the 2016-2018 plan and its expected performance based on past TRC test results. It also mentions the importance of Enabling Strategies in promoting energy efficiency and market transformation.
Nova Scotia will help drive program uptake 26 and contribute to market transformation. As with the 2019 DSM program mix, the proposed 27 2019 Enabling Strategies budget was developed in relation to the approved 2016-2018 Plan 28 and spendi...
AI summary Nova Scotia plans to increase the Enabling Strategies budget to 13.2% of the overall DSM Resource Plan budget in 2019, up from previous years, with $1.0 million allocated for this purpose. The increase is attributed to efforts to drive program uptake and market transformation.
9 Municipal Average Participants Average Non-Participants 10 11 12 The general modelling approach is the same as was used for the forward-looking 2016- 13 2018 DSM Resource Plan analysis (isolation of effects arising from proposed DSM only...
AI summary The document discusses the modelling approach used for the 2019 DSM Plan, noting its alignment with previous analyses and the projected impacts on energy production and demand. The proposed plan is expected to reduce energy production and peak demand, with minimal rate impacts for non-participants.
E-9E1 (SBA) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-21
28 passages
3.6 Direct Installation 7.6 2.0 1.3 0.4 Total 80.8 57.5 13.0 12.9 4 5 Energy Savings (GWh) Demand Savings (MW) Non- Non- DSM Program (2019) Lighting Lighting Lighting Lighting Measures Measures Measures Measures Efficient Product Rebates (...
AI summary The document presents a table detailing energy and demand savings from various DSM programs in 2019, including Efficient Product Rebates, Custom Incentives, and Direct Installation. It is part of EfficiencyOne's response to the Small Business Advocate (SBA) regarding the 2019 DSM Resource Plan (M08604).
tudies in 2011 and 2016 related 19 to estimating the market penetration of lighting measures. Please refer to Attachments 20 1 and 2 of this IR response for these studies. 21 22 As part of the 2017 Evaluation of programs, the Evaluation Co...
AI summary The response references studies on LED market penetration from 2011 and 2016, as well as 2017 evaluations analyzing Instant Savings and Business Energy Rebates programs. These evaluations assess market transformation and saturation of LEDs, with free-ridership levels discussed in part c). The document pertains to EfficiencyOne's 2019 DSM Resource Plan and responses to the Small Business Advocate.
in Nova Scotia. Corporate Research Associates Inc., 2016 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-09: 2 3 For Efficient Prod...
AI summary The response to Request IR-09 provides information on the 2019 DSM Plan, noting that EfficiencyOne sets targets at the program and component level, not at the measure level. It refers to Table 11 and Table 31 of the 2017 Efficient Product Rebates DSM Evaluation Report for a breakout of claimed savings by measure.
0.48 3 4 5 c) Please refer to part b) above, and Table 2 below. 6 7 Table 2: Planned 2018 and 2019 Performance Metrics for Programs Offered to Small 8 Business Customers Planned Planned Planned First- Peak Planned First- Year Year Program...
AI summary The text references a table outlining planned performance metrics for energy programs targeting small business customers in 2018 and 2019, including energy savings, peak demand reductions, expenditures, and cost per unit. The document is part of a regulatory proceeding related to the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan.
E1 (SBA) IR-10 Page 2 of 2 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate
AI summary The document pertains to EfficiencyOne's 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan (M08604) and includes responses from EfficiencyOne to the Small Business Advocate (SBA).
This is the most recent 2018 forecast of energy 26 (Column AY) and demand savings (Column AX), as well as budget (Column BF), by 27 measure for the Direct Installation program. 28 29 c) Please refer to part b). As the 2019 DSM Resource Pla...
AI summary EfficiencyOne has not developed new measure-level forecasts or budgets for the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, as it is based on a continuation of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. The 2019 amounts are expected to be consistent with previous technical tables.
E1 (SBA) IR-13 Page 1 of 1 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to the Small Business Advocate regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan under matter M08604. It discusses EfficiencyOne's approach to demand-side management and related programs.
tomers access ENS’s small business services. 26 • Website - updated ENS’s website content to reach the small business audience effectively. 27 • Associations, events, and partnerships - hosted Small Business Week events in four 28 location...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) has taken several steps to improve access to its small business services, including updating its website, hosting Small Business Week events, and distributing printed materials with energy-saving tips and website links.
E1 (SBA) IR-14 Page 1 of 1 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-15: 2 3 Regarding the incentive levels for measures includ...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan continues the approach from 2018 without specific new incentive levels for the Direct Installation program. ENS anticipates similar measures and incentives to those in 2018, though changes may occur based on market trends and program needs.
ENS-01169-V1 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate
AI summary The document pertains to Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, specifically responding to the Small Business Advocate in the proceeding identified as M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
Business Advocate (“SBA”);1 and ii. The results of a survey that evaluated, among other things, why small businesses do or do not participate in efficiency programs. EfficiencyOne produced the first part of this Study and retained Corporat...
AI summary The document outlines the Small Business Energy Study conducted by EfficiencyOne and Corporate Research Associates (CRA) at the request of the Small Business Advocate (SBA) during the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan regulatory process. The study aimed to evaluate small business participation in efficiency programs and was developed in collaboration with the SBA under the terms of the Quantum Agreement, despite the agreement not being approved by the UARB.
the 2016-2018 DSM Plan Compliance Filing and the 2017 mid-course adjustments. 12 Table 2 provides program participation data and Table 3 provides a breakdown of unit 13 costs. 1 See M06733, The Public Utilities Act and An Application for A...
AI summary The document discusses the 2016-2018 DSM Plan Compliance Filing and 2017 mid-course adjustments, including program participation data and unit costs. It references a prior order related to a supply agreement and Demand Side Management Resource Plan.
ear-end totals. 4 1 As agreed to in the UARB-approved 2016-2018 DSM Plan Consensus Agreement, ENS is now reporting on lifetime energy savings. See M06733, NSUARB Decision, The Public Utilities Act 5 and An Application for Approval of a Sup...
AI summary The document references the UARB-approved 2016-2018 DSM Plan and discusses the methodology for estimating lifetime energy savings, which is more sophisticated than previously used. It also mentions the Efficient Product Installation (EPI) program, formed from merging two existing programs, and refers to variances in energy savings targets.
-approved net 22 incremental energy and net peak demand savings targets in ENS’s 2016-2018 DSM 23 Resource Plan and the corresponding 2016-2018 DSM Plan Consensus Agreement. 4 2 In 2017, ENS’s mid-course adjusted investment amount was $0.6...
AI summary The document discusses Efficiency Nova Scotia's 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and the corresponding Consensus Agreement, including mid-course adjustments to investment amounts and program results compared to targets.
SBA IR-17 Attachment 1, Page 46 of 92 Efficiency Nova Scotia 2017 DSM ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT 1 Regulatory Affairs 2 3 Regulatory Affairs activities enable ENS to meet its regulatory requirements and 4 provide a fair and transparent process...
AI summary This section outlines the role of Regulatory Affairs at Efficiency Nova Scotia, emphasizing its importance in meeting regulatory requirements and ensuring a fair and transparent process for stakeholder input on DSM Resource Plans, programs, and investments.
s regulatory requirements and 4 provide a fair and transparent process for stakeholders and Nova Scotians to offer input 5 into DSM Resource Plans, programs, and investments. 6
AI summary The text emphasizes the importance of regulatory requirements and the need for a fair and transparent process for stakeholders and Nova Scotians to provide input on DSM Resource Plans, programs, and investments.
ENS will also work with its Evaluation Consultant again in 2018 to establish an 21 appropriate scope for the Codes and Standards evaluation. 22 23 Regulatory Affairs 24 25 Regulatory Affairs activities will include reporting to the UARB an...
AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS) will collaborate with its Evaluation Consultant in 2018 to define the scope of the Codes and Standards evaluation. Regulatory Affairs activities include reporting to the UARB and stakeholders on various topics, including DSM Resource Plans, financial reports, and non-energy benefits quantification.
high delta EnerGuide. The Evaluator commends ENSC on this action and therefore recommends that the results of these reviews be tracked in the DSMDS. 2013 Evaluation Adapt the next tracking system (DSMDS) to the QA program: A QA program PP-...
AI summary The Evaluator commends ENSC for adapting the DSMDS tracking system to the QA program and recommends tracking results within the system. ENS agrees and plans to implement the QA program fully by 2014, with interim tracking on a spreadsheet until full integration.
building commissioning a mandatory element of Custom NC and/or including a full energy simulation review to ensure the accuracy of the model inputs. 2014 Evaluation Adapt the next tracking system (DSMDS) to the QA program: A QA program PP-...
AI summary The document discusses the need to adapt the DSMDS tracking system to a QA program, with ENSC agreeing to implement this in 2014. The Evaluator recommends tracking QA results in the DSMDS and using a temporary spreadsheet until full integration is achieved. CEAs involved in assessments should be identified to support training.
In future years, ENS should require the Evaluator to include a copy of the operative evaluation plan Recommendation Complete ENS agrees with this recommendation. In the 2017 DSM Programs Complete within the overall Executive Summary, suppl...
AI summary ENS agrees with a recommendation to improve the evaluation process by including a copy of the operative evaluation plan in the Executive Summary and explaining the rationale for changes in evaluation components. The Evaluator provided detailed descriptions of evaluation approaches in 2016 and 2017.
products were added to the 2017 Codes & Standards evaluation. Attachment 1, Table 4, 2013-2015 Verification Recommendations Efficiency Nova Scotia - 2017 DSM Annual Progress Report Date Filed: March 29, 2018 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Sid...
AI summary The document references the 2017 Codes & Standards evaluation and includes an attachment with verification recommendations from 2013-2015. It also mentions the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan (M08604) and responses from EfficiencyOne to the Small Business Advocate.
hat the determination of the Affordable Multifamily Housing Pilot’s 24 inclusion in ENS’s 2019 portfolio will be made at a later date. 25 26 c) Please refer to parts a) and b). Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (SBA) IR-18 Page 1 of 1 Efficiency...
AI summary The text indicates that the inclusion of the Affordable Multifamily Housing Pilot in ENS’s 2019 portfolio will be determined at a later date. It also references parts a) and b) for further details.
E1 (SBA) IR-18 Page 1 of 1 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to the Small Business Advocate regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18). It focuses on addressing concerns and providing information related to the DSM plan.
ans to access knowledgeable, qualified contractors. 28 29 b) EfficiencyOne does not set separate targets for audit vs. do-it-yourself options, as the 30 measures supported through both options are largely the same. Date Filed: May 30, 2018...
AI summary EfficiencyOne does not set separate targets for audit versus do-it-yourself options in its 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, as the supported measures are largely the same under both options.
E1 (SBA) IR-19 Page 1 of 2 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to the Small Business Advocate regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan under proceeding M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-20: 2 3 Regarding the proposed demand reduction pilots proposed under Enabling Strategies in 4 2019 DSM Resource Plan (EfficiencyOne 2019 DSM Plan Filing – Evidence, Page 16 of 23, 5 Line 12 – 14), please prov...
AI summary The response to Request IR-20 addresses proposed demand reduction pilots under the 2019 DSM Resource Plan. EfficiencyOne has not estimated peak load reductions or included system-coincident demand savings in its performance targets. The pilot programs aim to identify optimal delivery techniques and understand their impact on customer load shapes, rather than focus on immediate economic or load reduction metrics.
ity to use the ETS system to charge during 23 periods of high wind production, or allow the ETS unit to provide ancillary services to 24 the grid, such as frequency regulation. 25 26 None of the demand response activities, discussed by NS...
AI summary The document discusses the availability of technologies for demand reduction pilot options, including ETS systems, which are commercially mature and do not interfere with the 2019 DSM Resource Plan. EfficiencyOne confirms that all necessary technologies are available.
E1 (SBA) IR-20 Page 4 of 4 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Small Business Advocate
AI summary This document pertains to EfficiencyOne's 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, reference number M08604 (E-ENS-R-18), and includes responses from EfficiencyOne to the Small Business Advocate.
E-11E1 (Synapse) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-22
88 passages
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-03: 2 3 Page 14 rows 10 through 13 of the Evidence states, “In the context of the development of the 4 2019 DSM Resource Plan as a continuation plan, EfficiencyOne is proposing largely the same 5 performance t...
AI summary EfficiencyOne clarifies that the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan did not include total spending or ratepayer benefits as performance targets but as indicators. Savings from pilot programs (e.g., demand response) are included in 2019 targets, though lifetime GWh savings are not yet a target despite improved tracking capabilities.
19 Performance Targets. 26 27 c) EfficiencyOne’s ability to track lifetime savings continues to improve. In 2017, the 28 Evaluation Consultant performed the first independent operational review of measure 1 M06733, E-43, EfficiencyOne Appl...
AI summary The text discusses EfficiencyOne's improved ability to track lifetime savings and references a 2017 independent operational review by an Evaluation Consultant. It cites regulatory filings and proceedings related to the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and Synapse Energy Economics' involvement.
E1 (Synapse) IR-04 Page 3 of 3 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-05: 2 3 Page 18, rows 3 through 5 of the Evidence sta...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan response directs to Table 1 for cost-effectiveness test results and participation estimates, omitting lifetime benefits, TRC, and PAC data due to their inclusion in the 2016-2018 Plan. The 2019 plan assumes similar results to prior years despite measure mix shifts and higher costs.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-06: 2 3 Page 18, rows 16 through 20 of the Evidence state, “With the exception of the 2015 4 continuation year, EfficiencyOne’s and ENSC’s past DSM Plans have been based on a data- 5 modelled approach that cal...
AI summary EfficiencyOne explains that prior DSM Plans used Navigant's ELRAM model for cost-effectiveness analysis, but the 2019 plan avoided this approach to prevent increased costs and diverting funds from programs, as inputs had not changed materially. The response details the ELRAM's bottom-up methodology and mentions avoided cost inputs.
E1 (Synapse) IR-08 Page 1 of 2 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 EfficiencyOne anticipates the DSM consultant’s modelling effort...
AI summary EfficiencyOne outlines its approach to the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, emphasizing a bottom-up modelling method and a timeline for development and filing. The plan will be filed with the UARB in Q1 2019, preceding NS Power’s next IRP and a DSM Potential Study update.
2022. 20 21 c) Please refer to part a). 22 23 d) EfficiencyOne’s 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan will be filed with the UARB in Q1 24 of 2019, in advance of the next IRP. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-08 Page 2 of 2 Date Filed: May...
AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan will be filed with the UARB in Q1 2019. The document includes a Request for Proposal (RFP) dated April 26, 2018, outlining EfficiencyOne's right to reject proposals and disclaim liability for respondent costs.
LIST OF TERMS, SYMBOLS, AND ACRONYMS iii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 RFP SCHEDULE 1 3 PROJECT BACKGROUND 2 EfficiencyOne and the Efficiency Nova Scotia Franchise 2 The technical development of the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan 3 4 SCOPE OF WORK 4 Mod...
AI summary The document outlines the scope of work for a project related to the development of the 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan by EfficiencyOne and the Efficiency Nova Scotia Franchise. It includes sections on model inputs, outputs, characteristics, and project phases.
LIST OF TERMS, SYMBOLS, AND ACRONYMS Terms, Symbols, Definition Acronyms The alternative DSM Resource Plan is a specific DSM Resource Plan that was given consideration by EfficiencyOne, NS Power and other stakeholders, but was not ultimate...
AI summary The text defines key terms and acronyms related to the Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan process in Nova Scotia, including the Alternative Plan, Best Value procurement approach, and the role of EfficiencyOne as the franchise holder of Efficiency Nova Scotia.
A requirement having a significant degree of importance to the objectives of Should the RFP UARB Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board iii Date Filed: May 30, 2018 Synapse IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 6 of 47 1 INTRODUCTION EfficiencyOne (E1) i...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is seeking a DSM Consultant to develop ENS’s 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, including a Preferred Plan and an Alternative Plan. The plan must pass a Total Resource Cost test and be modelled using software that allows for inspection by EfficiencyOne, regulatory intervenors, and the UARB. The project term is from July 2018 to December 2022.
clarification checkpoint meeting for that week 1 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 Synapse IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 7 of 47 3 PROJECT BACKGROUND The following sections provide regulatory context and background on this project (the 2020-2022 DSM Res...
AI summary The document discusses the background of the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan and the transition of Efficiency Nova Scotia from a non-profit corporation to a franchise under the Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Restructuring (2014) Act.
SM Resource Plan for 2019, based on a continuation of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. This was done to create consistency in DSM funding during NS Power’s Rate Stability Plan (2017-2019).5 1 Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act, SNS 200...
AI summary The text discusses the continuation of the DSM Resource Plan for 2019, based on the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, to ensure consistency during NS Power’s Rate Stability Plan (2017-2019). EfficiencyOne is required to submit two additional three-year DSM Resource Plans to the UARB for approval.
ARB to seek resolution. For more information about EfficiencyOne and Efficiency Nova Scotia please visit: • EfficiencyOne: • Efficiency Nova Scotia: http://www.efficiencyns.ca/ THE TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE 2020-2022 DSM RESOURCE PLAN E...
AI summary The document outlines the development of the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan by Efficiency Nova Scotia (ENS), noting the use of technical quantitative modelling approaches. It explains that the 2015 and 2019 plans used a continuation approach, but the 2020-2022 plan will be fully modelled, focusing on technical development of the quantitative model.
e Plan’s impacts. This procurement focuses exclusively on the technical development of a quantitative model used to accurately describe the planned impacts of the proposed DSM Resource Plan. In past quantitative modelling efforts, Efficien...
AI summary The text discusses the technical development of a quantitative model for the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, emphasizing the need to model at least one alternative plan. It references past stakeholder agreements and the influence of negotiations and stakeholder input on the modelling effort.
nd customer preferences in Nova Scotia. In addition, a modelling approach that can offer predictive functions with respect to market behaviour and measure uptake will be considered an asset. 4 SCOPE OF WORK EfficiencyOne is seeking an expe...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is seeking a DSM consultant to develop ENS’s 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, including a Preferred Plan and an Alternative Plan, both fully modelled. The consultant must use modelling software that allows for input and output inspection by EfficiencyOne, regulatory intervenors, and the UARB. The model must support Total Resource Cost testing for ENS’s six programs.
from past DSM plans, but that model inputs are readily available from E1. The successful proponent must be prepared to defend the merits of their modelling approach in an independent manner. MODEL INPUTS The successful respondent’s modelli...
AI summary The document outlines the requirements for model inputs in the context of Demand Side Management (DSM) evaluations, emphasizing the use of data from EfficiencyOne and the responsibility of the consultant to format the data for their modeling software.
asset. 4.1.2 Desired Model Inputs In addition to those model inputs deemed mandatory by EfficiencyOne, the ability to use the following inputs is also desired: • System and rate class energy and demand consumption forecasts; • Current mark...
AI summary The document outlines desired model inputs for the DSM Resource Plan, including energy consumption forecasts, market saturation, customer rate information, historical achievements, and code velocities. Mandatory model outputs are also specified, which will be used by EfficiencyOne to communicate the impacts and merits of the proposed plan.
, and are not flexible.7 4.2.1 Mandatory Outputs Mandatory outputs from the modelling effort shall include (for both the Preferred and Alternative Plans): • Program administrator planned investment by measure, program, portfolio, year and...
AI summary The text outlines mandatory outputs required from a modelling effort for both the Preferred and Alternative Plans, including program investment, energy savings, demand savings, and cost-related metrics, all categorized by measure, program, portfolio, year, and plan term.
r and plan term; and • Energy- and demand-based unit-costs (first-year incremental and lifetime) by measure, program, portfolio, year and plan term. 4.2.2 Desired Model Outputs • Desired outputs from the modelling effort shall include (for...
AI summary The document outlines the desired outputs from a modelling effort for energy and demand-based unit-costs, including cumulative energy and demand savings, participant cost test results, and the ability to reproduce outputs based on rate classes and measure categories. The focus is on the Preferred and Alternative Plans, with data spanning multiple years and plan terms.
ded may require alteration in format and form by the successful 7 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 Synapse IR-08 Attachment 1, Page 13 of 47 respondent. It is also anticipated that regular discussion relating to the interpretation of data may be r...
AI summary The successful proponent is expected to configure and operate the model, taking direction from EfficiencyOne, and produce output data for the draft Preferred Plan. Iterative changes to initial scenarios are anticipated based on feedback from the E1 project manager before the draft models are finalized.
onclusion of this phase, the draft model will be available for EfficiencyOne’s use in, among other things, internal review, Plan negotiation, and sharing with stakeholders. 4.6.3 Phase II, part a – Model Revision Model revisions may be req...
AI summary The document outlines Phase II, part a of the model revision process, which involves revising the model based on internal review, stakeholder input, and negotiations with NS Power. The process is expected to be lengthy, from November 2018 to March 2019, and will result in the development of Alternative Plans based on stakeholder feedback. Final model outputs will be submitted to the UARB as part of the regulatory process.
tive Plans. EfficiencyOne intends to proactively submit the model outputs to the UARB, and may be directed to file the models themselves as part of the regulatory process. 4.6.4 Phase II, part b – Regulatory Process The regulatory process...
AI summary EfficiencyOne plans to submit model outputs to the UARB as part of the regulatory process for the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan. The successful proponent may be required to answer questions or provide testimony regarding the model and its development. Ongoing support may be required after the regulatory process concludes.
s (RFN) preceded the issuance of this RFP and was conducted to further inform the development of the scope of work for this RFP. Responses to questions asked during the RFN process are provided below. Question Question Answer Number 1 To w...
AI summary The document outlines the expectations for the Consultant in verifying model inputs provided by EfficiencyOne (E1). The Consultant is not expected to verify the reasonableness of model inputs, except for general knowledge of incremental measure costs, which is considered an asset. The desired model output includes cumulative energy and demand savings by measure, program, and portfolio.
0.133 8.210 0.244 0.034 0.888 0.054 Meter (GWh) Line Loss Factor 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 1.099 Total Net Energy Savings – at the 0.147 9.022 0.269 0.037 0.975 0.059 Generator (GWh) Effective Useful Life (years) 7 9 10 7 9 10 Net Life...
AI summary The text contains numerical data related to energy savings, line loss factors, and effective useful life of assets, as well as information about a request for proposals (RFP) for technical development and modeling related to Nova Scotia's 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan.
ugh understanding of the model inputs and outputs as well as core concepts in DSM planning, e.g. Cost-effectiveness testing, measure characterization. 3 SOFTWARE LEAD: The Software Lead will be responsible for tasks related to data manipul...
AI summary The text discusses the roles and responsibilities for a Software Lead in a DSM planning project, emphasizing data manipulation and model configuration. It also references tables assessing both controllable and non-controllable risks, though the content is incomplete and lacks specific details about the risks themselves.
nd its resulting submitted Proposals shall be deemed to have been made in the Province of Nova Scotia and shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Province of Nova Scotia. • EfficiencyOne has the right to exten...
AI summary The document outlines the terms and conditions of a bid submission for EfficiencyOne's 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, including provisions for contract extension, conflict of interest disclosure, and the absence of addenda for this bid.
pplicable) There have not been any addenda issued for this bid. EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary The document references the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan (M08604) and mentions that no addenda have been issued for this bid. EfficiencyOne has provided responses to Synapse Energy Economics.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-09: 2 3 Page 22, rows 7 through 9 of the Evidence state, “ENS’s electronic Technical Reference 4 Manual (eTRM) was completed in 2017, allowing for its use in the delivery of the 2019 DSM 5 Resource Plan.” 6 a)...
AI summary The response to Request IR-09 clarifies that the eTRM was not used in the development of the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, but will be used in its delivery. It also explains that the eTRM is integrated with ENS’s data management system and cannot be viewed in isolation. The response references Attachment 1 and a prior submission (M08415).
f previous DSM Resource Plans, the most 28 current evaluation results will inform savings estimates for the 2019 DSM Resource 29 Plan. The eTRM is in the process of being updated to reflect the 2017 evaluation 30 results. Please refer to t...
AI summary The document discusses updates to the eTRM, including revised deemed savings values for Appliance Retirement, new interactive effects categories for Residential Efficient Product Installation, and updated energy savings assumptions for heat pump measures based on the 2017 evaluation results.
te Filed: May 30, 2018 Synapse IR-09 Attachment 1, Page 6 of 6 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document is a response by EfficiencyOne to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604. It outlines EfficiencyOne's position on the proposed DSM plan, including potential impacts and considerations.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-10: 2 3 Please refer to Table 1 – 2019 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment on page 3 of 4 Appendix A. 5 a) Please provide a break-out of Investment, Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings 6 at the Generato...
AI summary The document outlines a request for detailed breakdowns of investment and energy savings data from the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, including specific subprograms like the First Nations pilot and Home Energy Assessment. The response indicates that the First Nations pilot is largely funded in 2018 and included in the Home Energy Assessment component, while demand reduction pilots are categorized under Enabling Strategies.
operated under Enabling Strategies, as 28 opposed to within a program component; as such, their budgets are shown under the 29 Development and Research line item in Table 1, below. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 1 of 9 Ef...
AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2019 DSM Resource Plan followed a continuation approach, and cost-effectiveness tests and lifetime benefits for program components were not completed. References are made to prior responses for detailed results.
E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 2 of 9 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines E1's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan under matter M08604. It focuses on efficiency programs and customer-related initiatives.
Development & Research 2.2 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Enabling Other Enabling Strategies 0.7 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Enabling Strategies Total 4.5 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Total 34.1 127.2 1638.4 20.2 0.268 0.021 511,83...
AI summary The document includes a table with data related to development and research, enabling strategies, and total figures expressed in 2019 dollars. It also references a Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan filed on May 30, 2018, and a response by EfficiencyOne to Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 3 of 9 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 41 b) Please refer to Tables 2 and 3, below, for the 2016 and 2017...
AI summary EfficiencyOne provides responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, noting that cost-effectiveness tests and Lifetime Benefits are not calculated after a program year has concluded and are therefore not included in the tables provided.
E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 4 of 9 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary The document presents E1's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan under matter M08604. It outlines E1's position on the DSM plan and related efficiency initiatives.
2 51 dLifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 5 of 9 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand...
AI summary The document discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits from demand-side management (DSM) program measures, expressed as the net present value of avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program.
E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 5 of 9 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines E1's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
2 58 dLifetime benefits are expressed as the net present value of the avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of the program measures. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 6 of 9 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand...
AI summary The text discusses the calculation of lifetime benefits as the net present value of avoided costs, including energy and capacity, over the life of program measures. It also notes that due to the lack of modelling for the 2018 mid-course adjustment, lifetime benefits and related test results are not available.
E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 7 of 9 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 62 Table 4: 2018 Approved Plan - by Program Component - Updated to reflect Mid-Course Adjustment Incremental Incremental Lifetime Net Annual Net Annual Net Incremental Energy Energy Demand First Year Lifetime Avoided Inves...
AI summary The text presents a table titled '2018 Approved Plan - by Program Component - Updated to reflect Mid-Course Adjustment,' which includes columns such as 'Incremental Investment,' 'Annual Net Energy Savings at the Generator,' 'Lifetime Net Energy Savings,' and 'Avoided CO2e Emissions.' The table appears to detail energy efficiency and demand-side management program components and their associated metrics.
7.8 50.6 593.9 7.9 0.154 0.013 61,979 20,800 33.0 Business, Nonprofit, and Institutional Programs Custom Incentives 5.1 25.8 366.9 4.5 0.198 0.014 35,603 111 16.9 Custom 4.2 24.2 362.1 4.2 0.174 0.012 not avail. not avail. 15.8 Energy Mana...
AI summary The text presents numerical data related to various energy programs, including Custom Incentives, Energy Management Information Systems, and Direct Installation, with metrics such as participation numbers, costs, and program impacts.
sions impacts estimated using the actual 2016 CO e emissions intensity of 653 tonnes/GWh, measured at the generator. 2 Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 8 of 9 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan...
AI summary The text provides data on the 2018 approved Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, including lifetime benefits, TRC, and PAC test results for various residential DSM programs. It references Table 5 and refers to EfficiencyOne's response to a prior matter.
ates Existing Residential 55.7 2.5 5.1 New Residential 8.4 2.8 6.5 Business, Nonprofit and Institutional Programs Efficient Product 30.3 2.5 4.9 Rebates Custom Incentives 38.1 3.4 5.6 Direct Installation 8.5 1.3 2.4 Total 148.3 2.5 4.6 76...
AI summary The document presents data on residential and business energy efficiency programs, including avoided costs and benefit/cost ratios. It references a DSM Resource Plan and mentions EfficiencyOne's response to Synapse Energy Economics, along with a filing date and reference number.
E1 (Synapse) IR-10 Page 9 of 9 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines E1's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, part of the regulatory proceeding M08604.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-11: 2 3 Please refer to Table 1 – 2019 DSM Resource Plan Savings and Investment on page 3 of 4 Appendix A. 5 a) Please provide a break-out of Investment, Incremental Annual Net Energy Savings 6 at the Generato...
AI summary Request IR-11 asks for detailed data on investment and savings from the 2019 DSM Resource Plan, including TRC and PAC test results. The response explains that end-use breakdowns were not modelled and provides data for 2016 and 2017, noting that cost-effectiveness tests depend on estimates rather than actual values.
EfficiencyOne cannot provide actual values 28 for Cost-Effectiveness Tests and Lifetime Benefits. Instead, the known actual values 29 of Program Administrator costs, energy savings and system peak demand savings allow 30 EfficiencyOne to c...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is unable to provide actual values for Cost-Effectiveness Tests and Lifetime Benefits. Instead, they use known Program Administrator costs, energy savings, and system peak demand savings to calculate the data presented in Tables 1 through 18 of the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan.
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 1 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary The document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan under matter M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Water Heating $0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Appliances $0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Lighting $0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Other $0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Total $1.4 3.9 136.4 1.1 $0.358 $0.010 2.6 Currency is expr...
AI summary The document presents a table with zero values across various categories such as Water Heating, Appliances, Lighting, and Other, with a total of $1.4, 3.9, 136.4, and 1.1 in different columns. It also mentions incremental emissions impacts estimated using the 2016 CO2e emissions intensity of 653 tonnes/GWh. The document is related to the EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) and includes responses from Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 2 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines E1's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, specifically matter M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
s may not add correctly, due to rounding. a Incremental (annual) emissions impacts estimated using the actual 2016 CO2e emissions intensity of 653 tonnes/GWh, measured at the generator. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 3 of...
AI summary The text discusses incremental annual emissions impacts based on the 2016 CO2e emissions intensity of 653 tonnes/GWh, and references the EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) and E1 responses to Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 3 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary The document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics' analysis of the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan under matter M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
s may not add correctly, due to rounding. a Incremental (annual) emissions impacts estimated using the actual 2016 CO2e emissions intensity of 653 tonnes/GWh, measured at the generator. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 4 of...
AI summary The document references a 2016 CO2e emissions intensity of 653 tonnes/GWh and discusses the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604, including responses to Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 4 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning ( $1.4 3.4 101.2 1.0 $0.407 $0.014 2.2 Lighting $0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Refrigeration $0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Process $0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Energy Management $0...
AI summary The document presents a table showing emissions impacts and costs related to various energy sectors, with data expressed in 2017 dollars. It also references a 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and a response to Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 5 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document refers to the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan (M08604) and includes responses from E1 to Synapse Energy Economics.
s may not add correctly, due to rounding. a Incremental (annual) emissions impacts estimated using the actual 2016 CO2e emissions intensity of 653 tonnes/GWh, measured at the generator. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 6 of...
AI summary The document discusses incremental annual emissions impacts based on the 2016 CO2e emissions intensity of 653 tonnes/GWh. It also references a 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan filed on May 30, 2018, and responses to Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 6 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 7 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document is a response by EfficiencyOne to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
4.0 41.3 0.7 $0.165 $0.016 2.6 Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning ( $3.6 10.2 203.9 7.3 $0.349 $0.017 6.7 Lighting $2.7 12.5 117.7 0.0 $0.216 $0.023 8.2 Refrigeration $0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0 Process $0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n/a n/a 0.0...
AI summary The text presents a table with data on energy usage and costs across various sectors, including Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning, Lighting, and Refrigeration, with figures in 2018 dollars. It also references a Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan filed in May 2018 as part of a regulatory proceeding.
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 8 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document refers to EfficiencyOne's 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, identified as M08604 (E-ENS-R-18), and includes responses from E1 to Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 9 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
20.6 0.1 $0.062 $0.006 1.4 Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning ( $3.1 15.5 297.2 2.9 $0.202 $0.011 10.1 Lighting $10.2 54.4 613.9 9.3 $0.188 $0.017 35.6 Refrigeration $0.9 4.0 57.2 0.7 $0.224 $0.016 2.6 Process $1.2 7.4 76.3 0.7 $0.1...
AI summary This document contains a table with energy-related data, including costs and emissions impacts, and references a 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan filing by EfficiencyOne (M08604). The data is expressed in 2018 dollars, and rounding may affect column totals.
E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 10 of 11 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
d) Please refer to the tables provided in parts b) and c) of this response for avoided 4 emissions data. Eligible customer and participant count by end use is not available. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-11 Page 11 of 11 Efficie...
AI summary The document refers to tables in parts b) and c) for avoided emissions data and mentions that eligible customer and participant count by end use is not available. It also outlines a request for detailed program information and provides a response reference.
e. Target customer segments and market segments 10 f. Market barriers and how the program designs address those barriers 11 g. Marketing strategies 12 13 Response IR-12: 14 15 a-c) As the 2019 DSM Resource Plan is based on the continuation...
AI summary The response to the 2019 DSM Resource Plan discusses the continuation of the 2016-2018 plan and refers to attachments for detailed information. Marketing strategies, including a new brand platform, are mentioned as part of the annual planning process.
on Advisors, are subsidized for qualifying new homes, prior All other measures: Early Replacement variety of upgrade opportunities. The primary upgrades considered typically relate to the to being constructed. The initial energy assessment...
AI summary The document describes a program where energy efficiency upgrades for new homes are subsidized by ENS based on energy performance ratings. An initial assessment is conducted using house plans, and a final assessment is done after construction to determine rebates. The 2019 DSM Resource Plan is based on the continuation of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan and is not detailed to the same level as the 2018 program.
measures. by streamlining the participation process. Measure eligibility is based on prescriptive products. Custom measures are also eligible for SBES, where identified and savings estimated by the Small Business Energy Auditor and/or iden...
AI summary The document outlines eligibility criteria for measures under the SBES program, including prescriptive and custom measures, and references the 2019 DSM Resource Plan and responses to Synapse Energy Economics.
– 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-14:
AI summary The document references the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan (M08604) and mentions responses to Synapse Energy Economics. It is marked as non-confidential and includes a request labeled IR-14.
continued load-growth within the NS electricity system; 27 • The possibility of a forthcoming Advanced Metering Infrastructure introduction 28 in NS; and 1 Demand reduction in this context refers to program strategies that seek to achieve...
AI summary The text discusses potential factors affecting load growth in Nova Scotia's electricity system, including the introduction of Advanced Metering Infrastructure, and defines demand reduction strategies in the context of the 2019 Demand Side Management Resource Plan. It also references a submission by EfficiencyOne to Synapse Energy Economics in response to the DSM Plan.
E1 (Synapse) IR-14 Page 1 of 5 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 • Better intelligence relating to demand reduction and demand re...
AI summary The text discusses trends in capacity-related avoided costs, noting a shift from zero avoided costs for capacity between 2015-2018 to approximately $200 per kW in 2019. The Net Present Value of avoided capacity costs increased significantly from $930 in 2015 to $1,710 in 2019, highlighting improved value for demand reduction activities.
E1 (Synapse) IR-14 Page 3 of 5 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 the firm contribution to system-coincident peak will grow by 6.4 per cent over the 10- 2 year period of 2017-2027. This continued growth will likely be associated with supply- 3 side capacity additions, or demand-side en...
AI summary The text discusses the expected growth in system-coincident peak contributions over a 10-year period and the potential introduction of Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) in Nova Scotia. It highlights the importance of a phased approach to demand response initiatives to minimize risks associated with future program design and operations.
E1 (Synapse) IR-14 Page 5 of 5 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-15: 2 3 Page 4, rows 4 through 8 of Appendix A state,...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is being asked to explain the additional costs expected in 2019 due to the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan Application Process, including the nature of the process, the need for additional funds, and whether a study is included in these costs.
c) Please explain why additional costs are needed for this purpose in 2019. 11 d) Do these costs include funds to conduct a potential study? If not, why not? 12 13 Response IR-15: 14 15 a) In 2019, EfficiencyOne expects to incur costs rela...
AI summary EfficiencyOne outlines expected costs for the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan filing process in 2019, including legal and consulting costs. The process is expected to follow a similar timeline and structure as the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan application, with plan drafting in Q3 2018 and a regulatory hearing anticipated after filing with the UARB.
E1 (Synapse) IR-15 Page 1 of 2 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 c) Additional costs will be incurred for the 2020-2022 hearing p...
AI summary EfficiencyOne anticipates higher costs for the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan process due to the need for full DSM Plan modelling, alternate scenarios, and increased UARB and legal costs. These costs are consistent with those incurred for the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. A DSM potential study was conducted in 2019.
the costs incurred for the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan application 18 process. 19 20 d) Yes, EfficiencyOne has included the costs to conduct a DSM potential study in 2019. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-15 Page 2 of 2 EfficiencyO...
AI summary EfficiencyOne has included the costs of conducting a DSM potential study in 2019 as part of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan application process. This is in response to questions raised by Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-15 Page 2 of 2 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18). It provides insights into the DSM plan and related efficiency initiatives.
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-16: 2 3 Page 7, rows 4 through 12 of Appendix A state, “ENS anticipates an increase in 2019 net 4 incremental energy and peak demand savings when compared to the approved 2016-2018 5 DSM Resource Plan. This ou...
AI summary ENS anticipates an increase in 2019 net incremental energy and peak demand savings despite lower Instant Savings, citing diversification of energy-efficient technologies and higher targets in the 2019 DSM Resource Plan compared to the 2016-2018 plan.
n (Annual Average) 2019 DSM Resource Plan 14.9 1.5 23 24 Within EPR, the Instant Savings component greatly exceeded its planned energy and demand 25 savings amounts in 2016 and 2017. As a result, the Residential EPR program also exceeded i...
AI summary The 2019 DSM Resource Plan shows that the Instant Savings component exceeded its planned energy and demand savings in 2016 and 2017. The Residential EPR program's 2019 savings targets are higher than the annual averages in the approved 2016-2018 Plan but lower than recent actual savings.
E1 (Synapse) IR-16 Page 2 of 2 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, identified by the matter number M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
ulation, basement slab insulation, drain water heat recovery, and heat recovery 26 ventilation). The heat pump, wood/pellet burning equipment, and solar heating equipment 27 measures listed above are also offered to mobile/mini homes throu...
AI summary The text outlines energy efficiency measures such as insulation and heat recovery systems, and mentions that these are available to mobile homes through the Green Heat program. It also references a 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and responses to Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-17 Page 1 of 2 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18). It provides feedback on the DSM plan and related energy efficiency initiatives.
18 completed in Q2 2018. 19 20 Additional incentive level research will also be initiated in 2018, related to incentives for new 21 homes. This research is scheduled to be completed in 2018. Date Filed: May 30, 2018 E1 (Synapse) IR-18 Page...
AI summary The document outlines the completion of incentive level research for new homes in Q2 2018 and mentions the initiation of additional research in 2018. It also references the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan and responses to Synapse Energy Economics.
E1 (Synapse) IR-18 Page 1 of 1 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines E1's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604. The plan is part of a regulatory proceeding involving Energy Nova Scotia (ENS).
E1 (Synapse) IR-19 Page 1 of 2 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 not to include it in the pilot options at this point: three-elem...
AI summary EfficiencyOne outlines its 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, noting that no demand reduction targets beyond system-coincident peak demand savings are planned. The plan includes pilot options that do not require utility signals or ITC infrastructure and does not anticipate reliance on AMI technology for these pilots.
8 E1 (Synapse) IR-20 Page 3 of 3 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-21: 2 3 Please provide an update regarding the timi...
AI summary EfficiencyOne is evaluating the performance of the Affordable Multifamily Housing Pilot from 2018 before deciding whether to continue it in 2019. The pilot aims to support low-income Nova Scotians with energy efficiency initiatives.
E1 (Synapse) IR-21 Page 1 of 1 EfficiencyOne – 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18) E1 Responses to Synapse Energy Economics
AI summary This document outlines EfficiencyOne's responses to Synapse Energy Economics regarding the 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan M08604 (E-ENS-R-18).
the necessarily higher unit costs to attain non-lighting savings. 26 27 For the 2017 RBIA, which showed historical results for 2011-2016 and estimates for 2017 and 28 2018, the estimated number of participants in 2017 and 2018 were held eq...
AI summary The 2017 RBIA used historical participation data from 2016 to estimate 2017 and 2018 participant numbers, excluding Energy Saving Actions. The savings and costs per participant for 2017 and 2018 were generally higher than in 2016.