Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Demand Side Management Resource Plan" in M08888

Matter: E-ENS-G-18 - EfficiencyOne - Evaluation of DSM Programs - Application to allow inclusion of Non-Energy BenefitsEfficiencyOne - Application for approval of the use of Non-Energy Benefits within Cost-Effectiveness Testing
11 passages 6 documents

Demand Side Management Resource Plan across all matters →

E-1Application 3 passages
2. SUMMARY OF VEIC METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS As requested in EfficiencyOne's initial Scope of Work, VEIC's general approach in recommending NEB values at a measure-level was to look to other jurisdictions who had heavily invested in primary research relating to the study of NEBs. While many jurisdictions, in an effort to account for NEBs in CE testing, have examined NEBs to the degree of assigning an "adder" or multiplier to overall portfolio benefits 4 , far fewer jurisdictions have undertaken substantive primary research. The three candidate jurisdictions were identified as Massachusetts, Maryland, and Rhode Island. After examining resources available from Massachusetts, Maryland, and Rhode Island, VEIC selected Massachusetts as the source jurisdiction, on the basis on its research being the most comprehensive and rigorous, as compared to the other two jurisdictions analysed. In addition, both Maryland and Rhode Island relied, to a degree, on Massachusetts research when developing their own NEB values. VEIC subsequently mapped measure and end-use-level values from the Massachusetts research base and TRM to the measures modelled as part of the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan modelling process, as these measures still largely form EfficiencyOne's current portfolio, and also form the last fully modelled CE analysis used in the DSM planning process. In addition to mapping between Massachusetts and NS measures, VEIC performed adjustments to the NEB values on the basis of several factors: p. pp. 6-9
2. SUMMARY OF VEIC METHODOLOGY AND RESULTS As requested in EfficiencyOne's initial Scope of Work, VEIC's general approach in recommending NEB values at a measure-level was to look to other jurisdictions who had heavily invested in primary...

AI summary VEIC selected Massachusetts as the source jurisdiction for NEB values due to its comprehensive research, mapping measures to NS's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan, and adjusting values based on factors. Maryland and Rhode Island also relied on Massachusetts research. EfficiencyOne's portfolio still uses these measures.

1 To allow the work performed to remain relevant to NS, both EfficiencyOne and p. pp. 14-15
1 To allow the work performed to remain relevant to NS, both EfficiencyOne and 2 VEIC recommend that the values described in the VEIC Report (specifically 3 Appendix C) form a "living document". 4 5 Specifically, EfficiencyOne plans to und...

AI summary EfficiencyOne seeks the UARB's approval to use specific values from the VEIC Report for future CE testing and to implement annual NEB values on a per-first-year kWh basis for the BNI sector. They also request approval for an ongoing management and update strategy and to base future Low Income NEB estimates on a 2016 Massachusetts study.

Summary of ENS's Position Cont. p. pp. 67-68
Summary of ENS's Position Cont. - ENS, as part of its regulatory submission regarding NEBs, will request approval to leverage the Mass. Low-Income NEI's Report2, excluding health-care system benefits (socialized in Canada), in future cost-...

AI summary ENS seeks approval to use the Mass. Low-Income NEI's Report2 (excluding Canadian healthcare benefits) in future cost-effectiveness testing for low-income programs, pending UARB acceptance. This approach will be applied during the next DSM Resource Plan evaluation.

E-5E1 (Multeese) RIR-1 to RIR-17 1 passage
Preamble p. p. 20
Request IR-13: - EfficiencyOne's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan included two participant-based resource benefits - Water Savings and Wood Savings. E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (Multeese) Information Requests

AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan included participant-based resource benefits such as Water Savings and Wood Savings. The responses to information requests from the Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (Multeese) are being analyzed.

E-6E1 (NSPI) RIR-1 to RIR-43 2 passages
NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. p. 50
NON-CONFIDENTIAL Request IR-10: Ref: Attachment 4, page 13 of 64, last paragraph. Please list all "local insights" provided by the project subcontractor and used in the study. Response IR-10: The following response has been provided by Ver...

AI summary VEIC's subcontractor, Ramzi Kawar, provided local insights on Nova Scotia's energy use, costs, health, and poverty, focusing on NEBs within the 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan. Input on low-income and health benefits was limited. Filed November 14, 2018, as part of E1 responses to NSPI.

NON-CONFIDENTIAL p. pp. 83-100
NON-CONFIDENTIAL 1 Request IR-32: 2 3 Ref: Application, page 8, lines 5-6. 4 5 E1 states that: 6 7 "Water savings values were adjusted by using Halifax Water and Wastewater 8 rates, as opposed to those found in Massachusetts." 9 10 (a) Why...

AI summary The document discusses a request (IR-32) questioning why VEIC used Halifax water rates instead of average Nova Scotia rates and how it accounted for households with private water supplies. E1 responds by stating that Halifax Water rates were used, consistent with previous DSM Resource Plans, for establishing monetary savings.

E-9E1 (Synapse) RIR-1 to RIR-9 1 passage
E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (Synapse) Information Requests p. p. 18
E1 Responses to Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (Synapse) Information Requests 1 Request IR-05: 2 3 Were there any measures that were previously excluded from EfficiencyOne's portfolio 4 because they were not cost-effective before the...

AI summary EfficiencyOne's response indicates that no previously excluded measures have been reinstated into its 2019 portfolio due to the inclusion of non-energy benefits (NEBs). For the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, no specific measures have been identified for inclusion based on NEB considerations, as the portfolio development process is ongoing and subject to stakeholder input.

E-10-(i)Book of Authorities 3 passages
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. p. 3
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION for Approval of a Supply Agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Incorporated, the estab...

AI summary The document outlines an application by EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) for approval of a supply agreement for electricity efficiency and conservation activities, and the establishment of a 2016-2018 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan, before the Nova Scotia Utility & Review Board (NSUARB).

3) EFFICIENCY ONE PERFORMANCE TARGETS p. p. 106
3) EFFICIENCY ONE PERFORMANCE TARGETS a) EfficiencyOne's cumulative energy and demand savings targets shall be 405.9 GWh and 62.5 MW respectively, as set out in EfficiencyOne's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan filing.

AI summary EfficiencyOne's 2016-2018 DSM Resource Plan sets cumulative energy and demand savings targets of 405.9 GWh and 62.5 MW, respectively. These targets are central to the proceeding's discussion of performance metrics for energy efficiency programs.

IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT p. p. 368
IN THE MATTER OF THE PUBLIC UTILITIES ACT - and - IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION by EFFICIENCYONE for Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne and Nova Scotia Power Inc. a...

AI summary EfficiencyOne (E1) seeks approval for a supply agreement with Nova Scotia Power Inc. (NSPI) and its 2019 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan. The Nova Scotia Utility and Review Board (UARB) conducted a paper hearing, with intervenors including the Consumer Advocate, SBA, and Ecology Action Centre. Submissions and evidence were filed in June 2018.

75686IG (E1) IR-1 to IR14 1 passage
Preamble
- With respect to the Specific Requests for Approval in s.3.3 (p.13-14) - (a) Is E1 proposing to include the per measure values in Table 10 in its application for approval of a Plan and Budget for 2020-2022? - (b) Will any approved per mea...

AI summary The text outlines specific requests for approval related to per measure values in Table 10 and the inclusion of these values in future Plans and Budgets. It also inquires about the intention behind the modifier 'subject to discussion on implementation at the DSMAG' concerning Low-Income NEBs.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →