Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Depreciation Amortization" in M07544

Matter: E-ENS-R-16 - EfficiencyOne - Incentive Setting Methodology Review and RecommendationsGroup with M06733
2 passages 1 document

Depreciation Amortization across all matters →

E-3-(i)REVISED Incentive Setting Methodology: CLEAResult Report & Efficinecy One Implementation Report - Redline Version 2 passages
Scenario General Description p. pp. 33-37
Table 2: Incremental Equipment Cost Scenarios Scenario General Description This approach to the calculation where a combination of two base cases is used is called the Remaining Useful Life Discounted Incremental Equipment Cost method (RUL...

AI summary The document presents two scenarios for calculating incremental equipment costs: the Remaining Useful Life Discounted Incremental Equipment Cost method (RULDICM) and the Replacement After Assumed Failure/Burnout scenario. RULDICM discounts the costs of existing equipment over its remaining useful life before comparing them to the costs of efficient equipment. The second scenario considers replacement after equipment failure, treating it similarly to early replacement.

Cost Effectiveness Test General Description and Features p. p. 39
Table 4: Cost Effectiveness Tests and Relationship to Incentive Setting from a Return on Investment Perspective Cost Effectiveness Test General Description and Features Implication for Incentive Setting typically quantified as the avoided...

AI summary The text discusses cost-effectiveness tests related to incentive setting, focusing on program administration costs (PAC), incentive costs, and the evaluation of utility conservation benefits using Net Present Value (NPV) over the lifetime of assumed savings persistence.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →