064632010 DSM Evaluation Reports 2/28/2011
7 passages
Table 3-4: Percent Flow versus Percent Full Load Power Percent Full Load Power (%) Inlet Guide Discharge Percent Flow (%) No Control Vanes Damper VFD 100 100 109 111 105 95 100 100 109 86 90 100 93 107 73 85 100 86 106 64 80 100 82 104 57...
AI summary Table 3-4 compares the percent flow versus percent full load power for various control methods including inlet guide vanes, discharge dampers, and variable frequency drives (VFD). The data illustrates how each method affects power consumption at different flow percentages.
nstalled in Truro and Dartmouth. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A29 Table 3: Summary of Controlled Refrigeration Equipment Installed Measures Evaporator Fan Door Heater Outside Air Location Control Control Cooling Truro Y Y...
AI summary The document presents a table summarizing the installation of controlled refrigeration equipment across various locations, including Truro, Bedford, Dartmouth, and Halifax, with details on specific installed measures.
t but were not completely sure. They had no knowledge of baseline condensate heater operation. They have seen the outside air dampers open to provide free cooling but are not sure how often they work. 6.0 On-site Observations and Findings...
AI summary The on-site observations found that nameplate data matched tracking values for evaporator fans, condensing units, and door heaters. Cooler temperatures were satisfied during the site visit, and outside air supply fans and compressors were not operating. Door frames were cold, indicating anti-condensate heaters were not active, and evaporator fans were off in most locations.
6.0 On-site Observations and Findings On each of the sampled floors, there were slight discrepancies between the verified installations and the fixture quantities claimed in the tracking data. In general, these discrepancies were on the or...
AI summary The document reports slight discrepancies between verified installations and fixture quantities claimed in tracking data across various floors. Discrepancies were generally small, ranging from 1 to 2 lights, with most floors showing minimal differences between tracked and evaluated counts.
In the M&V analysis, it was assumed that circular traffic signals were green for roughly 50% of the time in any direction and left turn arrows were green for 30% of the time. In order to illustrate why this is a problem, consider the persp...
AI summary The M&V analysis overestimated the time traffic signals were green and underestimated the time they were red at intersections with protected left turns. Adjustments were made by assuming protected and permissive intersection scenarios to better reflect actual traffic signal timings and reduce potential collisions.
5% of the time; drivers traveling in the other two directions are moving the other 49.5% of the time. During the remaining 1% of a given cycle, all lights are red. Within the 49.5% of the time that drivers traveling in either direction A o...
AI summary The text describes a traffic light cycle where 50% of the time is allocated to one direction, 49.5% to the opposite direction, and 0.5% to all lights being red. During the 49.5% of the cycle, the light is divided among three combinations for traffic flow.
NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program Page A86 Table 6: Summary of evaluation analysis operating factors Protected Left Permissive Left Signal Type Operating Factor Operating Factor Green Traffic Signal 31.000% 47.500% Yellow Traffic S...
AI summary The text presents a table summarizing the evaluation analysis of operating factors for various traffic signals and pedestrian indicators. It includes percentages for different signal types under 'Protected Left' and 'Permissive Left' conditions.