Topic:"Distribution Planning" in M12282

Matter: EfficiencyOne - New Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans Application for Approval of New Benefit Cost Analysis Test for Evaluating Demand Side Management (DSM) Plans

2 passages 2 documents

Distribution Planning across all matters →

E-1Notice of Application and Evidence 1 passage

Section 468

&(&([ÿ /-0 ÿ120 -+$)ÿ]-,'^,$)_@ÿ4+;!5 0ÿ 6 7 ÿ̀aXMHÿPLSÿPOJLBJÿLÿbLOCJBEÿGVÿSGScJSJOdEÿCZULPBHÿefXgHhÿVGOÿiGHBÿPNHBGZJOHÿBiLBÿLOJÿHJULOLBJÿ VOGZÿBiJÿJSJOdEÿHLbJRÿGOÿUOGRNPJRÿjEÿaXMHkÿILjDJÿlcmÿUOJHJSBHÿLÿHNZZLOEÿGVÿiGHBÿPNHBGZJOÿfXgHÿBiL...

AI summary The text discusses various aspects of regulatory proceedings, including fuel-cost-adjustment mechanisms, cost-recovery, and prudency reviews. It references proceedings involving Nova Scotia Power and the Affordable Bill Cap, as well as topics such as distribution planning and energy efficiency programs.

Open document →

E-7E1 (Synapse) RIR 1-24 1 passage

- 3 framework. p. p. 5

- 3 framework. 1 Request IR-05: 2 3 Refer to Table 3 on pages 10 and 11 of the Evidence of David Hill. 4 5 (a) Please describe the basis for allocating 50% of transmission and distribution capacity to 6 transmission and 50% to distribution...

AI summary The response to Request IR-05 explains that the 50/50 split between transmission and distribution costs is a simplifying assumption made by EFG, based on NS Power's data on avoided transmission and distribution costs. The response also references a table showing avoided transmission and distribution costs over time.

Open document →

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →