Topic/Matter Intersection

Topic:"Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act" in M09096

Matter: Approval of a Supply Agreement for Electricity Efficiency and Conservation Activities between EfficiencyOne (E1) and Nova Scotia Power Inc.(NS Power), the establishment of a final agreement between the parties, and approval of a 2020-2022 Demand Side Management (DSM) Resource Plan
10 passages 5 documents

Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation Act across all matters →

E-1-1Application 1 passage
4 Cost-Effectiveness p. pp. 89-90
4 Cost-Effectiveness 5 6 To assess the cost-effectiveness of the 2020-2022 Preferred Plan, EfficiencyOne used 7 two industry standard screening tests: the TRC test and the Program Administrator Cost 8 (PAC) test. The TRC was used as the pr...

AI summary EfficiencyOne assessed the 2020-2022 Preferred Plan using the TRC and PAC tests. TRC was mandated by NSUARB to ensure a TRC of 1 or greater, while PAC provided supplementary cost-effectiveness analysis excluding voluntary contributions. Results are detailed in Table 1.

E-3E1 (NSPI) RIRs to IR-1 to IR-69 1 passage
Section 237
board heating as the dominant technology. 31 We change the way people use energy™ Date Filed: March 29, 2019 NS Power IR-15 Attachment 1 Page 48 of 206 Efficiency Nova Scotia – Policy, Performance and Programs Efficiency Nova Scotia Corpor...

AI summary Efficiency Nova Scotia Corporation (ENSC) operated from 2010 until 2015 when it was replaced by the ENS franchise, awarded to EfficiencyOne. The document outlines historical energy savings data from ENSC's operations and compares it to other jurisdictions.

E-52018 DSM Evaluation Reports 3 passages
Table 7: Comparison of EPI Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator p. p. 132
Table 7: Comparison of EPI Tracked and Evaluated Savings at the Generator Initial Gross Savings Adjusted Gross Savings NTGR Net Savings Energy Savings ENS Tracked Savings 16.093 GWh 14.468 GWh 0.93 13.480 GWh Evaluation Results 15.914 GWh...

AI summary Table 7 compares EPI tracked and evaluated savings at the generator, showing that evaluated net energy savings are 5% lower than tracked net energy savings. The differences are attributed to small decreases in installation rates and NTGR values, as well as unitary savings adjustments.

INTRODUCTION p. pp. 120-121
INTRODUCTION Hello, my name is _________, I am with Corporate Research Associates and we are performing an evaluation of energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. Our records indicate that you or your household recentl...

AI summary This text outlines an introduction to a survey conducted by Corporate Research Associates evaluating energy efficiency services provided by Efficiency Nova Scotia. The survey aims to gather feedback from participants of the Efficient Product Installation Service, which involves the installation of energy-efficient products at no cost.

READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2) AND (CI3 + CI4) SEQUENCES p. pp. 131-132
READ AND ROTATE (CI1 + CI2) AND (CI3 + CI4) SEQUENCES - CI1. Before participating in the Efficient Product Installation Service in [MONTH/YEAR], had you at any time in the past already participated in another Efficiency Nova Scotia program...

AI summary The text presents survey questions related to customer participation in the Efficient Product Installation Service, asking about prior involvement in Efficiency Nova Scotia programs and the influence of promotional materials on their decision to install energy-efficient products.

E-7Practices & Procedures Evaluatoin: Site Visit Quality Assurance 1 passage
Overarching Issues Research Questions p. p. 10
[Table 1-3](#page-10-0) provides an outline of Chapter [3](#page-15-0) and shows where, within the chapter, the research team addresses each of the study's research questions as listed i[n Table 1-2.](#page-9-1) Overarching Issues Research...

AI summary The text outlines research questions related to the efficiency and improvement of ENS's QA program, focusing on site visit planning, resource usage, and challenges faced by staff and QA inspectors. It references Table 1-3 and Table 1-2 for detailed discussion.

78612Compliance Filing 4 passages
Cost-Effectiveness p. p. 24
Cost-Effectiveness To assess the cost-effectiveness of the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan, EfficiencyOne used two industry standard screening tests: the TRC test and the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test. The TRC was used as the primary t...

AI summary EfficiencyOne assessed the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan using TRC and PAC tests. TRC was mandated by NSUARB decision [4] requiring a TRC of 1 or greater. PAC test results were shared as informational, excluding voluntary contributions. Results by sector are in Table 1. NSUARB Order M03669 from 2011 is cited regarding DSM Plan approval.

4 Table 6: DSM Resource Plan: Residential Sector Offerings p. pp. 32-33
4 Table 6: DSM Resource Plan: Residential Sector Offerings Program Program Target Delivery Enhancements Component Market Approach in 2020-2022 Segment Plan Residential Appliance Residential Turn-key New Appliance • Efficient Retirement (re...

AI summary Table 6 outlines the residential sector offerings under the DSM Resource Plan, including appliance retirement, instant savings, efficient product installation, and home energy assessments. It also details enhancements and new programs such as the Mi'kmaw Home Energy Efficiency program, which was renamed during the regulatory process for E1's 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan Application (M09096).

Performance indicators for the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program are provided in Table 7 below. p. p. 42
Performance indicators for the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program are provided in Table 7 below. 2020 24 224 700 0 0 0 (GWh) (GWh) (MW) (TRC) a (PAC) b (products) c Energy ($/kWh) d energy ($/kWh) e 2020 3.1 13.5 96.3 1.5 1.3 2....

AI summary The document presents performance indicators for the Residential Efficient Product Rebates program, including energy savings, costs, and program metrics from 2020 to 2022. The data includes energy savings in GWh, cost metrics in TRC and PAC, and the number of products distributed.

Cost-Effectiveness p. pp. 112-116
Cost-Effectiveness To assess the cost-effectiveness of the 2020-2022 Preferred PlanDSM Resource Plan, EfficiencyOne used two industry standard screening tests: the TRC test and the Program Administrator Cost (PAC) test. The TRC was used as...

AI summary EfficiencyOne assessed the 2020-2022 DSM Resource Plan using TRC and PAC tests. TRC was mandated by NSUARB decision [5] requiring a TRC of 1 or greater. PAC test results, excluding voluntary contributions, were presented as supplementary cost-effectiveness analysis. Table 1 details sector-specific cost outcomes.

Disclaimer: These summaries were generated by AI from the filings they describe. We take care to make them accurate, but errors are possible - and they aren't advice. Only the filings themselves are the record: if you're relying on something here, confirm it against the source documents or the Nova Scotia Energy Board's own record. Full disclaimer →