Topic:"Efficiency Preferred Partner" in M03452

Program Performance and Savings Finding Recommendation NH-F11. NH-R11. Only one of the four builders reported being satisfied with the The program should work to improve the scheduling and scheduling and timing of the audit. timing of the...

AI summary The findings highlight issues with the scheduling of energy audits, double counting of prescriptive measures in HOT2000, inconsistent modeling of CFLs, and the inability to model water heater pipe wrap insulation. Recommendations include improving audit scheduling, ensuring proper modeling practices, and addressing gaps in HOT2000.

or the on-site sample, including interactive effects. A one-to-one reference line is the plotted line on the diagonal, which would represent the line on which all points would fall if the tracking system savings estimates were exactly corr...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program found discrepancies between on-site savings and tracking system estimates. At several sites, fewer lights were installed or operating hours were lower than expected, leading to a 77.8% installation rate across all sites.

used is 1.0926 NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 16 3.4 Spillover Spillover is additional energy-efficient equipment installed by participants due to program influences and in the absence of dir...

AI summary The 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program led to spillover effects, with 19% of participants installing additional CFLs and 3% installing additional LEDs. The program influenced over 78% of respondents who made additional lighting upgrades, though spillover rates for LEDs were higher compared to previous years.

5 1 51 to 60 4 1 4 1 3 1 4 <1 6 3 <1 61 to 70 6 1 2 1 4 1 3 <1 8 1 <1 71 to 80 1 0 2 0 4 1 3 <1 4 1 2 <1 81 to 90 3 0 2 0 3 2 <1 3 1 91 to 100 0 0 2 0 1 2 <1 1 1 100 or more 10 1 11 0 31 1 17 <1 21 6 Average installed 40 8 41 7 299 9 62 3...

AI summary The text discusses the sampling error for the 2008, 2009, and 2010 telephone surveys conducted as part of the evaluation of the 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program. It notes that the sampling error was less than 10% at the 90% confidence interval for each survey.

names and over-stated the NMR Evaluation of 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program Page 26 number of measures they installed was removed from the program. In addition, the implementation vendors sought to determine the sco...

AI summary The 2010 Efficient Lighting Products Direct Install Program faced issues with overstated savings due to inaccuracies in tracking. An audit and site visits revealed overstatements of 2,294 MWh. To prevent future errors, the implementation vendor introduced new checks. The program's awareness sources included phone calls, email, and word of mouth.

cipate in the NSPI rebate programs? [Probe: Save energy, rebates offered, reduce maintenance costs, protect environment, recommended by utility, concerns with carbon, etc.] 12. Were there any challenges or barriers that you faced in making...

AI summary The text outlines a series of questions aimed at understanding the experiences and challenges of participants in NSPI rebate programs, including barriers to participation, issues encountered, and satisfaction levels with various programs and interactions with NSPI staff.

ed those listed in the application. The quantities, however, were slightly different. Table 2 below compares the fixtures found on-site with the fixtures specified in the tracking savings analysis. NMR Evaluation of 2010 C&I Custom Program...

AI summary The text compares the number of fixtures found on-site with those specified in the tracking savings analysis for the 2010 C&I Custom Program. There are slight discrepancies in the counts for certain areas, such as the basement and renovation area.

ccount for the fact that 24% of project savings had already been claimed during the 2009 program year. Total project energy and demand savings were multiplied by .76 to arrive at 2010 project savings. 5.0 On-Site Methodology During the sit...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 C&I Custom Program involved adjusting total project savings by 24% to account for savings already claimed in 2009. A site visit verified the installation of 753 out of 781 new lighting fixtures, and operating hours were assessed with the assistance of the site contact.

ce from another DSM program. NMR Evaluation of 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions Program Page 10 participating in the SBLS program, and only four of these respondents said the equipment was of the same efficiency or higher than had be...

AI summary The evaluation of the 2010 Small Business Lighting Solutions (SBLS) program found a very low spillover rate (<1%), with some participants reporting non-like spillover. The spillover rate was calculated based on additional lighting installed and estimated savings from program records. However, without follow-up inspections, the actual efficiency and savings from spillover could not be determined.