Topic:"Efficiency Preferred Partner" in M03669

NMR Evaluation of 2010 EnerGuide for Existing Houses Program Page 19 3 Process Evaluation 3.1 Methodology The 2010 process evaluation of the EnerGuide Existing Houses (EEH) program drew upon in-depth interviews conducted with program staff...

AI summary The 2010 process evaluation of the EnerGuide Existing Houses (EEH) program involved in-depth interviews with program staff, contractors, and delivery agents, as well as surveys of participants. The evaluation focused on program delivery, tracking, reporting, and suggestions for improvement.

ators and freezers. The guidebook is contained as an appendix within the LIH program manual. If the age of the appliance could not be determined from the guidebook, Delivery Agents were expected to consult web- based resources in order to...

AI summary The LIH program manual provided guidance for identifying appliance ages, but initial lack of information caused challenges for Delivery Agents. Program administrators are considering separating Scope I and Scope II audits to improve cost-effectiveness, with Scope II audits focusing on homes with higher energy savings potential.

ason that they information for identifying other energy efficiency had not pursued additional energy efficiency measures. This may measures they could implement. With the expansion indicate that respondents didn‘t have the time to research...

AI summary Respondents indicated that they did not pursue additional energy efficiency measures due to lack of time and awareness. Some also cited a lack of available financing as a barrier. The DI installation teams are encouraged to provide region-specific contact information for SBLS delivery agents. A potential financing program for energy efficiency measures is suggested.